0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
95 Ansichten1 Seite
1) A foreclosure action was brought by the plaintiff (Grimalt) against the defendant (Velazquez) regarding a mortgage on property. The property was sold at auction to the highest bidder (Sy Quio).
2) The court affirmed the sale without notifying the mortgagor. The mortgagor then paid the full amount due and asked to set aside the sale affirmation, which the court granted. However, the court required the mortgagor to pay interest to the bidder for the time between the bid being paid and returned.
3) The mortgagor appealed the interest requirement, arguing the bidder is not entitled to interest because the mortgagor
1) A foreclosure action was brought by the plaintiff (Grimalt) against the defendant (Velazquez) regarding a mortgage on property. The property was sold at auction to the highest bidder (Sy Quio).
2) The court affirmed the sale without notifying the mortgagor. The mortgagor then paid the full amount due and asked to set aside the sale affirmation, which the court granted. However, the court required the mortgagor to pay interest to the bidder for the time between the bid being paid and returned.
3) The mortgagor appealed the interest requirement, arguing the bidder is not entitled to interest because the mortgagor
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
1) A foreclosure action was brought by the plaintiff (Grimalt) against the defendant (Velazquez) regarding a mortgage on property. The property was sold at auction to the highest bidder (Sy Quio).
2) The court affirmed the sale without notifying the mortgagor. The mortgagor then paid the full amount due and asked to set aside the sale affirmation, which the court granted. However, the court required the mortgagor to pay interest to the bidder for the time between the bid being paid and returned.
3) The mortgagor appealed the interest requirement, arguing the bidder is not entitled to interest because the mortgagor
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Verfügbare Formate
Als DOC, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
G.R. No. L-11721 April 3, 1918 are assumed to know that the mere fact of being the highest bidder does not vest such ANDRES GRIMALT, plaintiff-appellee, bidder with the ownership of the property. vs. The action by which the ownership of the MACARIA V. VELAZQUEZ, and SY property is conveyed is the approval of the QUIO, defendants-appellants. sale by the court. If the debtor discharges the obligation at any time before a valid order is FACTS entered, confirming the sale, the right of the bidder is limited to the return of the money paid by him to cover his bid. The debtor, in The plaintiff, Grimalt, brought an action to paying the creditor the amount of the foreclose a mortgage upon defendant's judgment for the purpose of discharging his property. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff property from the lien of the mortgage of and, not having paid within the time limited, discharging his property from the lien of the the mortgaged property was offered for sale. mortgage, infringes no right whatever of the The highest bidder at the sale was Sy Quio, bidder. the appellant, who paid the Sheriff the full amount of his bid. The court, without notice WON the mortgagor is to pay the bidder to the mortgagor, affirmed the sale upon the interest upon sum deposited by him motion of the purchaser. Shortly after the mortgagor moved to set aside the order of Negative. Interest is payable by virtue of a affirmance upon the ground that it was void contractual undertaking, or as a result of the for lack of notice, and at the same time breach of an obligation after the obligor has deposited the full amount due under the been put in default. With respect to one who judgment of foreclosure, with interest and becomes a bidder at a foreclosure sale, the costs. The court granted the motion to set owner of the mortgaged property is in no aside the affirmance of the foreclosure sale, sense a debtor of any person who voluntarily but imposed upon the mortgagor the takes part in the bidding. condition of paying Sy Quio interest at the rate of 10 per cent per annum upon the amount of his bid from the time it was paid to the sheriff until its return to the bidder. ruizsharmine From that part of the decision decreeing the payment of interest the judgment debtor appealed, as did the bidder. Sy Quio, from that part of the decree by which the affirmance of the sale to him was set aside. The appeal of Sy Quio was disposed of by a decision dated October 2, 1917. The present decision relates only to the appeal of the mortgagor.