HIDDEN DANGERS OF

YOUR MORNING SHOWER

You wouldn't knowingly bathe in toxins every morning - - or set out to
ravage your lungs and sinuses, irritate your allergies, aggravate your skin,
or...perhaps most horrifying of all...willingly increase your risk of
cancer...would you? Of course not. But the fact is, the chlorine in your shower
water is a powerful toxin - - deadly to bacteria and fungi, and poison for your
body. You absorb 6 to 100 times more chlorine in a shower than you do by
drinking the same water!!! 2/3 of chlorine consumption comes from the shower.
When you take a 5 minute shower its equal to drinking chlorinated water for 30
days. That is how quickly the body absorbs chlorine into the body. When we're
under that hot water, our pores open up and soak up the chlorine. With the
shower system, you not only don't have to worry about the chlorine, but it also
runs the water through a magnet so you get energized water that goes directly
into the body. A warm shower opens up your pores, causing your skin to act
like a sponge. As a result, you not only inhale the clarion vapors, you also
absorb them through your skin, directly into your bloodstream - - at a rate that's
more than 6 times higher than drinking. In terms of cumulative damage to your
health, showering in chlorinated water is one of the most dangerous risks you
take every day. In
the short-term, chlorinated shower water irritates your eyes, your sinuses, your
throat, your skin, and your lungs. Long-term risks include excessive free radical
formation (which makes you age faster), higher vulnerability to genetic
mutation and cancer development, difficulty metabolizing cholesterol and
hardened arteries. Showering in chlorine-treated water is a serious risk - - but it
is also one of the very few risks you can immediately erase. And it is up to you
to protect yourself.
For almost 100 years, chlorine has been added to disinfect our municipal
water supply. The level of chlorine in your area depends on the
quality of your water supply, but even if there's no noticeable taste or smell, the
chlorine is present, as are the byproducts of chlorination,which include some of
the most potent carcinogens known.
Research conducted jointly at Harvard University and the Medical College of
Wisconsin found that chlorinated water was the direct cause of 9% of all
bladder cancers and 15% of all rectal cancers in the U.S.There is also evidence
that chlorine destroys protein in your body. As I am sure you are already aware,
this disinfectant bleach dries your skin, causes damaged and brittle hair and
burns your eyes. But what you may not be aware of is that if you suffer from
any of the following chlorinated water makes your condition worse: Asthma—
sinus conditions--Allergies--Skin rashes--Emphysema and that's just for
starters. The evidence is clear. The risks are tremendous. The advice is simple:
Stop chlorinating your body. You no longer have to gamble with your health on
contaminated shower water. Not only can you effectively remove the
chlorinebyproducts from your shower water - - you can also significantly
reduce lead, hydrogen sulfide (rotten egg smell), iron oxides and sediments.
Simply replace your existing showerhead with the Nikken Shower System.
Nikken now adds Magnetic Water Technology to its Advanced Chlorine
Filtration to create the ultimate shower system. This is the only product on the
market to combine these two water technologies. The Nikken Shower System
offers you maximum protection from both crystallization and chlorine. Nikken's
Magnetic Water Technology improves water simply and naturally, to help
reduce the crystallization, which occurs through normal water usage. This
prevents scaling inside pipes and fixtures and can lessen the deposit left on hair
and skin.
Nikken's Advanced Chlorine Filtration uses the only non-carbon shower
filtration to remove both free-radical chlorine and most types of combined
chlorine. And with a choice of two settings on the deluxe showerhead, you can
alternate between a regular spray and pulsating jets for an invigorating shower
massage.
Nikken’s PiMag Water Filtration System creates water virtually free of
organic matter – chlorine, heavy metal contaminations, etc.
Nikken’s Shower system has a filter that takes out the chlorine and other
sediments. It also helps remove lead, "rotten egg smell", iron oxides and
sediments.
1
Water You Drink
Can Make or Break Your Health
If someone were to ask, “Is water important to your health?” we would most
likely answer, “Of course” and add, “I know we’re supposed to drink about 8
glasses a day.” Some people may even follow these recommendations, but far
more are satisfied with just parroting back this basic knowledge. We typically
minimize the real importance of water. Maybe water is not flashy enough yet
water deserves top billing where health is concerned. The practitioners and
organizations, which emphasize the importance of water, deserve our applause.
If our consciousness and consumption of water can be raised we will have taken
a gigantic step in preventative care.
According to Rudolph Ballantine, M.D., author of Radical Healing (1999), “It
is a significant advancement in biological science that we are beginning to see
water as not merely an inert medicine in which compounds float but as
something alive with complex molecules, changing and charged with
information. The more we learn about water, the more obvious it will become
that a good quantity and quality of water is a cornerstone of sound health.”
Exactly How Important is Water Really?
CONSIDER THIS:
- We are composed of 70% water (some sources say up to 80%) Think about
that…. we are mostly water
- Brain cells are 75-85% water. The right kind of water improves the mind and
brain. Doesn’t it stand to reason that there has to be something hugely special
about this substance as it relates to our system? Our adaptive mechanism keeps
the brain hydrated first, sacrificing other areas if necessary. The brain uses
electrical energy that is generated by hydrolysis as the preferred source over the
energy provided by blood sugar (glucose).
- The water volume that is stored in the disc cores (especially the 5th lumbar
disc) supports -75% of the weight of our upper body
- 50% of cartilage in joints and discs is made of water
- Blood is composed of about 50% water. Every 90 days we build a brand new
bloodstream.
- OUR TOTAL BODY WATER IS REPLACED ABOUT EVERY 15 DAYS.
THINK ABOUT THAT. IN ABOUT 2 WEEKS YOU COULD REPLACE
70% OF YOURSELF WITH SOMETHING HEALTHY AND PURE.
- Water is more important than food! The complete role of water in our system
is only partially understood. So far we know: Water supplies the body’s tissues
with oxygen and nutrients. Water is a solvent not just a transport mechanism. It
holds nutritive factors in solution while it delivers necessary components
throughout the body.
a. Water carries away excess wastes and flushes out toxins.
b. Water is a natural diuretic.
c. Water metabolizes stored fat and reduces fatty deposits.
d. Water controls our body temperature.
e. Water is Mother Nature’s greatest beauty tonic.
f. Water protects our body’s cells from attacks from diseases, viruses, etc. If
cells become water starved they become shriveled up, parched and dry, making
it easier for foreign invaders to enter the cells.
g. Water is necessary for the chemical reactions in our body to occur through a
process of hydrolysis.
h. Water flows through our cell membranes generating hydroelectric energy
(voltage) that is converted and stored in our
cells as energy (ATP and GTP).
i. Water holds our cell contents in their proper structural place, allowing for
optimal functioning.
What we are just beginning to learn about water (again, 70-80% of who we are)
is very exciting! It concerns the energetic properties of water. ‘Dead water’
has lost the subtle energetic quality that nourishes us on a non-physical level.
Since the function of the physical components has been the exclusive focus of
biochemists, nutritionists, etc. how we might be taking up the energy of water
has been largely overlooked. In Western society we are only beginning to
develop technology that allows us to tap into this level of what’s going on.
Perhaps the study of the energetics of food, water, etc. will be the science of the
new millennium. Pi-water is at the forefront of this endeavor.
Water Deficiency Syndromes
By understanding the proportion of water occupying our cells, tissues and
organs and the known functions of water, we can already begin to appreciate
what might happen if our bodies lack water. But beyond using our
imaginations, here are some specifics concerning water deficiency.
- 75% of Americans are chronically dehydrated.
- In 37% of Americans, the thirst mechanism is so weak that it is often mistaken
for hunger.
- Even MILD dehydration will slow down one's metabolism as much as 3%.
- One glass of water shut down midnight hunger pangs for almost 100% of the
dieters studied in a U-Washington study.
- Lack of water, the #1 trigger of daytime fatigue.
2
- Preliminary research indicates that 8-10 glasses of water a day could
significantly ease back and joint pain for up to 80% of sufferers.
- A mere 2% drop in body water can trigger fuzzy short-term memory, trouble
with basic math, and difficulty focusing on the computer screen or on a printed
page. Drinking 5 glasses of water daily decreases the risk of colon cancer by
45%, plus it can slash the risk of breast cancer by 79%, and one is 50% less
likely to develop bladder cancer. Dehydration is the number one stressor of the
human body – or of any living matter. We can be deficient in water just like a
vitamin deficiency with specific symptoms resulting from this. And just as the
simple treatment for vitamin and mineral deficiencies is to get them into our
system, the way to treat water deficiency is by drinking water.
Chronic dehydration is a disease producer. When our body is dehydrated the
bi-layer membranes that surround cells contract in thickness. It forms a barrier
that prevents further dehydration – but which also obstructs the free movement
of molecules so that metabolism, exchange of chemicals and elimination of
toxins are limited. While usually we consider thirst, dry mouth and skin as signs
of dehydration we are now beginning to realize a whole other spectrum of
symptoms which signal dehydration, i.e.;
- Sinus problems, allergies and breathing difficulties
- Joint discomforts, neck pain, etc.
- Obesity and digestive problems
- Headaches
- Heart problems, high blood pressure, high cholesterol
- Stress
- Sleep disorders
- Impotence
- Depression and brain dysfunction
If we go through the exercise of tracing how water deficiency contributes to
these symptoms we will increase our consciousness regarding the absolute need
to drink sufficient amounts of healthy water. (We have people like Dr.
Batmanhelijid, author of Your Body’s Many Cries for Water to thank for these
types of analyses and for stressing the simple medicine of things like proper
sleep, proper hydration, etc.)
Pain as a symptom of water deficiency
Histamine production increases when dehydration is present. Histamines are
active in water management and delivery. Prostaglandin’s, kinins, and PAF are
also water intake and distribution managers. The higher the production of these
items (in part as a protective response to dehydration) the higher the chances for
pain. These chemicals often cause irritation when making contact with the
painsensing nerves in the body. Histamine also causes bronchial constriction as
the body attempts to conserve the evaporation of water from the lungs.
Dyspeptic pain, rheumatoid arthritic pain, anginal pain, migraines, colitis and
allergic and asthmatic reactions are all, in part, connected to overproduction of
histamines, prostaglandin’s, etc.
Asthma and Allergies as symptoms of water deficiency
In addition to the histamine release, if the body is dehydrated, a protective
response is to produce more mucous in the lungs to protect the tissues from
drying out further and from loosing more body water through evaporation from
the lungs.
Neurological symptoms of water deficiency
Chronic dehydration causes brain cells to shrink. At 85% water, these cells
depend upon water to deliver and help with the formation of neurotransmitters.
If this is not occurring, degenerative changes can occur. The more stressed a
system becomes due to dehydration the more stress hormones it releases such as
endorphins, cortisone release factor, vasopressin, prolactin, renin-angiotensin,
etc. While we won’t go into all the effects of these chemicals, we should know
that their release creates further stress if not flushed out of the system.
Without water, it is easy to get into a cycle of stress, which eventually manifests
as things like chronic fatigue, depression, etc. Additionally we see increased
problems with information processing, memory loss, confusion, etc. Without
adequate water the brain is also depleted of the energy created through
hydrolysis. And finally, (from our limited knowledge base thus far) we also
know that dehydration causes depletion of tryptophan, which is a necessary
component to the formation of major neurotransmitters like serotonin,
tryptamine, melatonin, etc. Tryptophan is also central to sound sleeping
patterns.
Cardiac symptoms, High Cholesterol & High Blood Pressure - symptoms of
water deficiency
Again, as an adaptive process to conserving water, when the fluid volume in
vessels decreases, the vessels tighten up to keep blood moving. Eventually
capillary beds shut down. Cholesterol is one agent, which regulates
permeability of the cell membrane to water. Increased cholesterol is produced
as the body seeks to keep cells lubricated. Also, if we have inadequate water
intake prior to eating - as the food enters our intestines it must pull fluid from
within the system in order to digest the food. As a result, our overall blood
supply becomes more concentrated and less viscous. The first place oxygenated
blood travels, is to the heart and lungs. These areas are the most vulnerable and
would be the first to come in contact with deposits left from the ‘concentrated’
blood.
3
Colitis as a symptom of water deficiency
A hormone/neurotransmitter “motilin” is produced as we drink water. The
effect of motilin on the intestinal tract is to produce rhythmic contractions of the
intestines. Without this peristalsis we increase the risk of colitis and hiatal
hernia.
Arthritis as a symptom of water deficiency
Water functions as a lubricant allowing two opposing forces to freely glide over
one another during joint movement. In dehydrated cartilage the rate of abrasive
damage is increased. Swelling of joints may also occur as the dehydrated
system attempts to compensate by expanding vessels around the joint in order
to get water into the bone marrow for red blood cell production.
By now, you must be wondering, “Am I dehydrated?” Actually most people are.
It has been estimated that 80% of our elderly population is water deficient. Our
younger people especially need early education and role modeling of water
consumption so that lifetime health habits can be established. We would be
doing a wonderful service to our future generations and to greatly curbing the
exorbitant amount of funds poured into “illness” care.
Is There Any One Water That’s Better Than Others?
YES! Surface tension seems to be of primary importance in water quality.
Scientists are looking towards water treatments that lower the surface tension of
the water molecule. Fluids with lower surface tension move freely through the
intestinal lining, the capillaries and move freely through extra and intra-cellular
spaces, entering the cells and washing away molecular debris. Hard water has a
high surface tension while soft water has a low surface tension.
Minimally, we need water that is clean and contains the necessary minerals. If
you look at pictures of water droplets in various kinds of water - the differences
between pure and polluted water are quite striking. We need the best quality
water to maintain the best health. Pure water is a health tonic. Actually, the
secret of health lies in internal cleanliness. It means being 100% free of
unnecessary deposits.
Before we look at what perfect water might be let’s look at what it’s not.
Our Current Public Water System
- 30% of Americans drink water that violates federal health standards.
- A recent ABC news expose revealed over 700 chemicals found in drinking
water. 129 of these chemicals posed health threats according to the EPA. Our
water may contain radioactive particles, heavy metals, radon, gas solvents,
disinfectant by-products and solid particulate such as asbestos. Inorganic
minerals, toxins and chemicals can pollute, clog up and turn tissue into ‘stony’
formations throughout the body - generating pain, illness and premature aging.
- The EPA has also said that the tap water of 30 million Americans contains
dangerous levels of lead. More than 90% of water companies don’t use the
available technology to remove chemicals and toxins from drinking water. In
fact chlorine, fluoride, calcium carbonate, magnesium carbonate and potassium
carbonate are often put in the water to ‘purify’ it. These substances are very
unhealthy for us.
Fluoride
- Serious health problems may be caused or worsened with fluorinated water.
Cancer, digestive problems, urinary disorders, circulatory diseases, mental and
neural impairments, blood dyscrasias, immune system suppression, eye
diseases, endocrine disorders, skin, nail and hair problems, bone and joint
conditions, teeth and gum disease and birth defects have all been negatively
impacted by fluoride use.
- 11 associations have stopped endorsing water fluoridation in 1996, including
the AMA, the Amer. Cancer Assoc., the Amer. Diabetes Assoc., and the Amer.
Psychological Assoc.
- The Journal of the AMA in a study of 3,578 seniors living in fluorinated areas
found a 41% increase in hip fractures.
- The National Library of Medicine has revealed that bone density decreased
45% with fluoride. It is suspected that fluorides leach calcium from skeletal
structures. www.johnleemd.net/breaking_news/fluoridation_02.html
- The National Academy of Sciences has found that fluorine slows down DNA
repair activity.
Chlorine
- Since 1900, beginning with large-scale chlorination, the occurrence of heart
disease has increased almost 400%. Dr. Price, author if
“Coronaries/Cholesterol/Chlorine”, firmly believes free chlorine to be a major
contributor to heart disease causing fats in the blood to form deposits.
- Highly chlorinated water has resulted in a shift from beneficial HDL to
harmful LDL.
- 75% of our water is chlorinated. 66 new carcinogenic compounds have been
isolated from chlorinated water. Known carcinogens such as chloroform and
other trihalomethanes are formed when chlorine reacts with organic compounds
in the water. These chlorines accumulate in fatty tissue, such as breast tissue.
New evidence suggests that chlorinated water increases the risk of cancer for
the roughly 200 million Americans who drink it.
Calcium carbonate (lime)
- This ingredient is not only used in water purification but in making concrete.
Think of our blood vessels. The hardening is most detrimental in the small
arteries and vessels of the brain. Not all forms of calcium are beneficial.
4
Lead
- It has been estimated that lead may be contaminating more than 40 million
Americans.
- A recent study of 5,000 women in the state of California revealed that women
who drank tap water had twice as many miscarriages and children with birth
defects as those who drank bottled or filtered water. Five other studies reached
the same conclusion.
TYPES OF WATER WHICH CARRY MAXIMUM BENEFIT
Effects of Magnetizing Water
Research has shown the following can be observed after water has been
magnetized:
1. A decrease in water weight. (An article in the Washington Post reported on a
man in Tlacote, Mexico who ‘discovered’ water on his property that was lighter
than tap water. This water was effective in the treatment of AIDS, cancer,
obesity and high cholesterol. It was dubbed ‘miracle water’.
2. No changes in mineral concentrations.
3. A decrease in the quantity of nitrogen dissolved. (In fish tanks nitrogen
accumulates in stagnant water and uses up oxygen needed by fish. Magnets can
be used to fight the microorganism invasion or algae overabundance.
4. An increase in the number of crystallization centers. Magnetic fields break up
clusters, which lowers the surface tension of water molecules allowing for
easier absorption. This is a key feature. In recent years people have been
focusing on ways to produce water with lowered surface tension. Essentially,
the water is not as ‘sticky’. Calcium carbonate is electrically neutralized and
remains in suspension. The magnetized water dissolves deposits while flowing
through pipes, this pertains to industrial pipes as well as to our own ‘internal
piping’, gallbladders, urinary tracts and calcium and cholesterol clogged areas.
5. Altered binding forces between water molecules and various proteins, salts
and minerals appear to endow the water with the ability to dissolve buildups of
various types of salts and minerals. This increased mineral solubility also
improves the distribution of nutrients throughout the system.
6. An increased ability to establish a balanced ph. All enzyme activity and
fermentation processes are only possible within a certain pH environment,
which magnetic fields help to create. They specifically help with resolving
acidic conditions oftentimes seen with chronic diseases.
7. An increased enzyme reaction time. Every function of the body is dependent
upon enzyme activity. Enzyme activity occurs more efficiently in solutions of
lower viscosity.
8. An increase in hydrogen ion activity. This softens water without using salt.
In accordance with the properties described of magnetized water many
experiments and therapeutic results have been reported. For example:
- Reduced cholesterol due to decreased build up and hardening of arteries (in as
short as three weeks).
- Improved digestive functions, decreased gastric acid
- Tissue regeneration (a study in Puerto Rico of bed sores washed with
magnetized water were healed within 4 to 14 days with no further recurrence).
- Improved waste and toxin elimination
- Strengthened immune system
- Decreased fever
- Increased vitality
- Re-established metabolic balance
- Decreased constipation and cleaner intestinal tract
- Kidney and bladder stone reduction & decreased bladder rigidity. Ingestion of
50 ml magnetized water every 10 minutes for 8 to
10 times has been effective for the treatment of urinary retention.
- Reduced severity of menstrual problems
- Reduced dental calculus and gingival inflammation. (A peer reviewed double
blind, placebo controlled study in 1998 at the Med. Univ. of S. Carolina showed
64% less calculus, and a 27% lower rate for gingival inflammation. Johnson,
Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 25 (1998).
- Effective in the treatment of intestinal parasitic disease in children
- Increased vegetable growth. Texas A and M University found that squash
plants grown with magnetized water produced heavier vegetables.
- Increased productivity of livestock. Experiments with 85 cows revealed extra
liter of milk produced daily, easier conception, & increased muscle tone for
those cows given magnetized water as part of their diet. Sheep produced more
wool and chickens produced more eggs over a longer duration.
As a side note, the healing waters of Lourdes and Sedona are said to
possess a high magnetic field.
5
Far-infrared Effects on Water
Photons stimulate the endocrine system, metabolic processes, enzyme reactions
and brain activity. Photons are a component of light.
Without photons (energy from the sun’s rays) there is a lowering of cellular
energy, glandular insufficiency reduced ability to burn fats and toxins and a
reduced ability to absorb oxygen. Far-infrared can be infused into water giving
it this same ‘light’ energy and giving it additional vitality. This process occurs
with use of a material, which emits waves of 4-14 microns similar to the sun’s
far-infrared rays. Just like magnetic deficiency syndrome and water deficiency
syndrome, one can also have malillumination syndrome resulting in partial
absorption of nutrients, fatigue, depression, suppressed immune function, hair
loss, skin damage and other maladies. The greatest amount of the sun’s energy
output is in the far-infrared spectrum. This band is not visible to the human eye.
They are the safest and most beneficial for the body. It is perhaps not
coincidental that photons, at the 4-14 microns wavelength are the closest match
to the human cell, which measures 4-14 microns width.
All humans send and receive FIR (far-infrared) waves and ours are similar to
the resonance of a water molecule. This makes sense since we are 70-80%
water that we would be emitting largely the qualities of water. We also know
that substances of similar resonance can transfer and absorb energy easily from
one another. In some respects, we fortify one another energetically. Perhaps this
is one reason that newborns who are held more exhibit healthier growth and
development and also why married couples live longer; maybe we will find it is
not just the social benefits of companionship but the energetic benefits as well.
FIR waves have been strongly correlated with:
- Increased blood flow (due in part to the heat and removal of deposits and
toxins)
- Reduced muscle spasms
- Removal of toxins
- Improved lymph flow
- Suppressed growth of some cancers
- Reduced soreness
- Improved enzyme activity
- Improved osmosis across the cell wall membrane
- Reduced acidity especially where lactic acid is concerned
- Lower acidity also improves the ability of Ca++ to enter the cell which
improves intra and extra-cellular communication which has a positive effect on
the entire system
- Assistance with eradication of anaerobic organisms
- Attraction of calcium ions to cell membranes.
The vibration of the far-infrared light waves vibrates the water molecules,
which allows gases and other toxic materials to be released. When toxins come
into contact with the clusters of water they are encapsulated. If they are then
vibrated they are released and available to be flushed from the system instead of
remaining attached to the water molecule. Although, far infrared is not yet well
known in the U.S. for it’s healing capabilities, in Japan there is an Infrared
Society composed of MD’s & physical therapists to further the intense research
and support of this particular technology.

PI-WATER
What is it?
It is energy water. It is something alive. Essentially, it is a vibrational remedy,
imprinted with subtle energy patterns. Pi-water was discovered through the
study of botanical physiology. It was originally thought that a hormone was
responsible for causing plants to bud. Dr. Yamashita was conducting research,
attempting to isolate this hormone, when he discovered that what was causing
the flower to bud was not a hormone at all but a very minute amount of ferric
ferrous salt. In 1964, Dr. Yamashita, an agricultural scholar furthered his
research and found that this substance had other highly beneficial qualities.
Inducing this ferric ferrous salt into a high-energy state and infusing it through a
ceramic filter process creates -water. A particle is a quantum particle smaller
than an electron, neutron and proton. The meson causes the protons and
neutrons to exchange energy states with one another, which create energy and
electrical charges of it’s own. The amount of ferric ferrous (bivalent and
trivalent ferrite) is minute, a quantum particle – essentially such a trace amount
that it is only the energetic signature of the substance, which remains. (2x 10-12
mol.) Homeopathy also utilizes the trace signature of the substance. It is
theorized that these quantum particles are conductors and are responsible for
carrying information and cellular “memories” (previously encoded information)
such as natural bio-energetic and healing processes. At an International
Symposium on Preventative Oncology held in France in 1998, the participants
were very excited about the extraordinary benefits of -water. The following was
reported:
- It is the closest water to human body water
- It possesses high anti-oxidation properties because of it’s ability to eliminate
free radicals
6
- It provides bio-energy, for example there was an experiment where goldfish
were able to live for up to 216 days in a sealed container living off the energy in
the water. Under normal circumstances a goldfish would die after about 3 to 5
days in a container sealed in regular water.
- It increases the body’s amount of natural killer cells
- It enhances anti-body activities
- It improves the self-healing activity of body cells – waking up cellular
“memories” of health
- It carries more oxygen throughout the body, creating an oxygen rich
environment which destroys anaerobic organisms (cancer is anaerobic)
- It creates minute water clusters which improves the functions of cells and the
detoxifying effects of water
- It improves cellular adaptation to stress and stressful environments
- It neutralizes the pH of water, bringing it to just above 7 which is very close to
the pH of the body (few filtration systems manage water pH, as well as
magnetic forces , far-infrared wave and infusion)
- It enhances the transmission of information throughout the body
Given the qualities of Pi-water, one can begin to appreciate its many uses. At
this point most of the literature on -water comes from Asian sources. There they
have had over 30 years of experience.
Agriculturally, Pi-water has been used for cultivating crops without chemicals
and for producing larger vegetables. Experiments were done with spinach
plants, which are difficult to re-cultivate. With Pi-water, 25 consecutive
cultivations were achieved. Comparisons can be made between two identical
seedlings/bulbs. The one watered with Pi-water as opposed to regular water
demonstrates improved health, lowered disease and higher growth rates.
Livestock and Animals, have responded with improved meat quality, a
decreased level of anaerobic fermentation, an increase in egg production, an
improved taste, and lethargic animals became more active, playful and
interested in their surroundings.
Industrial use has shown that oxidation or rusting was greatly reduced. Dr.
Takafumi Tsurumi has collected a series of clinical anecdotes and studies with
some astounding results:
- Stomach cancer eradication, decrease of brain tumor, improvement in
leukemia
- Dermatitis improvement, improvement with alopecia
- Improvement in diabetes
- Improved liver function after hepatitis
- Lowered blood pressure and improvement in cardiac output
- Rapid recovery from stroke
- Relief of headaches, stiff joints, constipation
- Improved overall health
- Improved immunity (intake of Pi-water should be increased in the early stages
of a cold, flu or virus
- AIDS virus reportedly does not seem to multiply in this high-energy
environment.
Pi-water has been used to store tissue samples instead of placing them in a
hormone solution. The structure of the tissues remained intact for over 30 years
using this process. In addition to the various medical uses, Pi-water has been
used in;
Cooking
- Soaking meats increases tenderness
- Fewer spices were needed as the tastes of foods were intensified.
- Cleaning fruits and vegetables with Pi-water removes toxins and prolongs
their freshness (many Japanese restaurants use Piwater filtration systems
- Un-ripened bananas can be soaked for 30 minutes to sweeten their taste.
Gardening
- Spraying plants with Pi-water improves their colors
- watering with Pi-water increases root growth and foliage. .
Pets
- Pets exhibit a higher energy level when drinking Pi-water
- It is also beneficial as an odor remover when simply sprayed by a spray bottle
or if the pet consumes the water. Spraying areas with Pi-water will remove odor
possibly making other unnecessary.
- Spraying their coat with the water will enhance shinier and cleaner fur.
Cleaning
- Improved hair cleanliness, as well as skin (Pi-water filtration systems are
popularly found in many Japanese hair salons).
- Laundry doesn’t yellow as easily.
SOLUTION: Pi-Mag Water Filtration System / Energy Water
Everyone should at least be drinking filtered water, preferably also water which
is infused with magnetic energy from the earth, farinfrared light waves from the
sun and energy from ‘space’. Water should also have organic minerals, such as
coral calcium.
7
• Systems with water softeners, which use sodium, may be troublesome as the
increased sodium may be contributing to hypertension. Typically two parts
sodium extracts one part magnesium from the water.
• Roughly 2 million water filtration systems are purchased annually. Most of
these have a form of carbon filter which does not address the lead deposits
found in water.
• 85% of Americans are deficient in calcium. We need approximately 1000
mg. Per day. Calcium is important to cellular communication, nerve
functioning, heart function, bone stability and development and blood clotting
ability. A system, which removes everything in the water without restoring
natural substances, is shortchanging you.
• Water filtration systems should have at least a 0.4-micron pore filter size to
adequately remove microorganisms.
• We currently know of no other filtration system, which has magnetic fields,
far-infrared waves, maximum filtration, energy and the reinstatement of
necessary minerals.
• Once you have this technology you should drink 64 oz. per day, at least.
Drink at least one glass at room temperature in the morning ½ hr before eating,
1 ½ hrs after eating and at bedtime. This helps to clear the colon, promotes
regularity, strengthens the heart, oxygenates the brain, removes lipids and
instills tranquility. If you are bottling water the magnetic charge will last for
approx. 3 days providing you don’t rest it against a metallic surface. It can be
refrigerated. This water can be used internally as well as externally for things
like cleaning eyes, bathing wounds, healing burns, preventing blistering,
healing various areas, rinsing hair for maximum cleanliness and therefore
growth enhancing, etc.
• Not all fluids count for water intake; in fact some actually have a strong
diuretic effect. Sodas, coffee, alcohol, and teas have stimulants and dehydrate
the system. The CNS stimulants liberate necessary energy from the ATP
storage pool. People with Alzheimer’s and children with learning disabilities
should avoid caffeine. Orange juice has high potassium which promotes
histamine production. It should be monitored for people with asthma, allergies,
congestion, etc.
• If dyspepsia is present in water, it can restore the mucosal structure;
sometimes it can take as little as 10 minutes of sipping water to prevent a
dyspeptic episode. Using antacids with aluminum may be contraindicated as it
has been strongly implicated as a precipitating factor in Alzheimer’s,
(aluminum sulfate is at times used in water purification for city water).
• If you are suffering with any of the symptoms associated with water
deficiency, properly hydrate yourself. In about 3 weeks you may notice a huge
difference. Medications sometimes mask the symptoms of dehydration so be
aware of this as well.
• To assist with sleeping difficulties drink a glass of water and put a pinch of
salt on the tongue, letting it dissolve naturally.
• As stated earlier, practitioners who place an emphasis on this primary
component of healing and preventative care should be applauded! They are
instrumental in supporting the paradigm shift, which focuses on simple
solutions to deal with some major health care issues. Remember that in order to
be 100% healthy you must be 100% clean on an internal level.
What About Drinking Coca-Cola?
1. In many states (in the USA) the highway patrol carries two gallons of Coke
in the truck to remove blood from the highway after a car accident.
2. You can put a T-bone steak in a bowl of coke and it will be gone in two days.
3. To clean a toilet: Pour a can of Coca-Cola into the toilet bowl and .......Let
the "real thing" sit for one hour, then flush clean. The citric acid in Coke
removes stains from vitreous china.
4. To remove rust spots from chrome car bumpers: Rub the bumper with a
crumpled-up piece of Reynolds Wrap aluminum foil dipped in Coca-Cola.
5. To clean corrosion from car battery terminals: Pour a can of Coca-Cola over
the terminals to bubble away the corrosion.
6. To loosen a rusted bolt: Applying a cloth soaked in Coca-Cola to the rusted
bolt for several minutes.
7. To remove grease from clothes: Empty a can of coke into a load of greasy
clothes, add detergent, and run through a regular cycle. The Coca-Cola will help
loosen grease stains.
8. The active ingredient in Coke is phosphoric acid. Its Ph is 2.8. It will dissolve
a nail in about 4 days.
9. To carry Coca-Cola syrup (the concentrate) the commercial truck must use
the Hazardous material place cards reserved for highly corrosive materials.
10. The distributors of coke have been using it to clean the engines of their
trucks for about 20 years!
Water Resources and References
The following are a vast array of excerpts from reputable
magazine, books, pamphlets and governmental publications
date as far back as 1980 to 1997 representing the concerns of
drinking water pollution and its direct affect on health. As will
be immediately apparent, the seriousness of our polluted water
challenges have not improved but have, in fact, increased
dramatically.
. Trouble On Tap (Brochure) Natural Resources Defense
Council & US Public Interest Research Group, October
1995
“Radioactive drinking water contaminated with radon flows
from the taps and shower heads of over 19 million people at
levels in excess of EPA’s proposed standard...Radioactive
drinking water contaminated with radon kills…nearly 200
people a year…’Radon has long been known to cause lung
cancer in humans’ according to the Nation al Academy of
Sciences…EPA has found that radon and its decay products
pose significant cancer risks due to ingestion”
. Consumers Digest (magazine) Special Report: “How
Safe Is Your Water?” May/June 1995 Pages 65-69
“Thousands of communities nationwide are facing the same
problem; contamination of drinking water that isn’t fully
disclosed…Some 30 million Americans were served by water
systems that violated one of more public health standards in
1994, according to Carol Browner, Chief of the EPA, water
regulators simply can’t keep up with an assault on all fronts.
“Cryptosporidium ‘Crypto’ is naturally present in up to 87% of
surface water supplies. For most healthy people, crypto is quite
unpleasant, attacking the lower intestinal tract with persistent
diarrhea. For the ‘Immune-compromised’ this one-celled
creature can be devastating; it took an estimated 104 lives in
Milwaukee and sickened 400,000. The best method of killing
‘crypto’ is filtration but 20 of the largest water systems don’t
use filtration. Crypto and its larger most prevalent cousin
Giardia can survive chlorination. The EPA had cited Giardia as
the leading cause of waterborne illness.”
. Popular SCIENCE (magazine) “How Safe Is Your
Water?” October 1996, Pages 63-68
“Director of the Waterborne Disease Center at the University of
Connecticut Health Center says the main risk is a protozoan,
Cryptosporidium parvum, which forms cysts that can cause
severe intestinal problems. The EPA does not require that
engineers check for Cryptosporidium, citing the cost and
technical difficulty of identifying the parasite.” “Richard Mass,
Director of the Environmental Quality Institute at the University
of North Carolina in Asheville, heads a team that has analyzed
water samples from 100,000 American homes. ‘You have a one
in six chance that you are being exposed to
neurologically damaging levels of lead in your tap water’.”
. SELF (magazine) “Is your drinking water safe?” August
1997, pages 156-157
“Approximately 50 million Americans, roughly one in five, are
exposed to potentially harmful levels of hazardous materials
whenever they open their faucet...a study of tap water samples
revealed that 45,000 infants were drinking reconstituted infant
formula made with contaminated water. Half of those babies
were swallowing four to nine chemicals in every bottle. The
most recent EPA estimate is that more than 43 million
Americans drink water with high lead levels.”
. STATE OF THE WORLD (book) – a World Watch Institute
Report on Progress Toward a Sustainable Society,
Lester Brown, 1995
“In developing countries, 25 million people die every year from
pathogens and pollution in contaminated drinking water, and
diarrhea, which causes severe dehydration and malnutrition,
kills nearly 3 million children under age 5 every year and
accounts for one fourth of the deaths in this age group.
Humans pathogens that thrive in “aquatic” environments can
cause Hepatitis A, salmonella and various diarrheal diseases
that are linked to E. Coli, cholera, typhoid, and dysentery.”
. MADEMOISELLE (magazine) “What’s in your water?”
September 1990, page 121
“No matter where you live, you can’t assume the drinking
water is safe, says Brian Cohen of the Environmental Working
Group. Ironically, chlorine, normally a water safety here
because it kills bacteria, produces cancer-causing by-products
including trihalomethanes (THMs). According to Kenneth
Cantor, Ph.D., an epidemiologist with the National Cancer
Institute, consuming even low levels of THMs and other chlorine
by-products may, over a period of years, lead to bladder, colon,
or rectal cancer. Other potential carcinogens in water include
pesticides and fertilizer residues, such as nitrate and atrazine.
Then there is lead: exposure to even low levels can cause
elevated blood pressure and kidney damage.”
. PARENTS (Magazine) “Troubled Waters” March 1996,
pages 50-54
“All told, 30 million Americans – roughly one in eight – are
exposed to potentially harmful microbes, pesticides, lead, or
radioactive radon whenever they drink a glass of tap water or
take a shower, according to the EPA.”
. TOXICS A TO Z (book) - A Guide to everyday Pollution
Hazards, John Harle, 1991, page 57
“ The most important of these are a class of organic molecules
called trihalomethanes (THMs) of which the most studied is
chloroform. THMs are produced when chlorine reacts both with
naturally occurring organic matter, and with industrial organic
pollutants. Surface water contains more of these materials than
ground water. Approximately 80% of the population receives
chlorinated water; 50% receives chlorinated surface water.
Chloroform causes cancer in rats and mice.”
. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING (Magazine) – “Lead in Your
Drinking Water?” March 1987, Page 199
“According to the EPA, as many as 40 million unsuspecting
Americans may be consuming dangerously high levels of lead
(heavy metal) a toxic substance – when they drink water from
their faucets. Lead is thought to have the most serious effects
on small children, infants, and developing fetuses. Tiny
amounts are believed to alter brain development, increasing
the risk of behavioral problems and learning disabilities.”
. TOXICS A TO Z (Book) – A Guide to Everyday Pollution
Hazards, John Harle, 1991, page 58
“Lead poisoning is associated with learning impairment,
reduced IQ’s and hyperactivity in children; high blood pressure
in adults, and underweight and premature newborns. An
estimated 10 million children receive significant amounts of
lead in their drinking water.” (Page 105) “Lead cadmium,
chromium, selenium, nickel, and arsenic have produced
mutations in laboratory tests of human and other cells.
Exposure to methyl mercury or lead at this time can cause
gross deformities in development, including incorrect
placement of brain structure, severe cerebral palsy, blindness,
and poor or nonexistent language development. Lead exposure
in children has been linked to low IQ’s.”
. TIME (Magazine) Cover Story “ The Poisoning of
America – Those Toxic Chemical Wastes” September 22,
1980, Page 58
“ At last count, nearly 50,000 chemicals were on the market…
There is a price to pay for an industrial society that has come
to rely so heavily on chemicals; almost 35,000 of those used in
the US are classified by the EPA as being either definitely or
potentially hazardous to human health. The EPA estimates that
the US is generating more than 77 billion lbs. Of hazardous
chemical wastes a year and that only 10% are being handled in
a safe manner.”
. TIME (Magazine) Cover Story “The Poisoning of
America ’85 – Toxic Wastes” October 1985 (Same cover
as 1980 issue)
A letter from the publisher; “The decision to reprise the earlier
cover, an unprecedented step for the magazine, was prompted
by the heightened sense of urgency about the problem”. A
Problem That Cannot Be Buried – The poisoning of America
continues. “An environmental emergency” declared the
Surgeon General in 1980. ‘A ticking time bomb primed to go
off’, warned the
EPA…Meanwhile fears about toxic wastes continue to grow.
Each day more and more communities discover that they are
living near dumps or atop ground that has been contaminated
by chemicals whose once strange names and initial, dioxin,
vinyl chlorine, PBB and PCB as well as such familiar toxins as
lead, mercury and arsenic. THE PROBLEM IS WORSE THAN IT
WAS
FIVE YEARS AGO.”
. AMERICA THE POISONED (Book) How Deadly Chemicals
are Destroying our Environment, Our Wildlife, Ourselves
and HOW WE CAN SURVIVE! Lewis Regenstein, 1982,
Pages 168-169
Contaminating the Water – Our Nation’s Most Grievous Error –
“Our ground waters are threatened by ruinous contamination.
This will become the environment horror story of the 80’s…the
most grievous error in judgement that we as a Nation has ever
made” Eckhardt Beck, Assistant Administrator EPA, July 1980
“Repeated warnings by environmentalists for over a decade
have recently been confirmed by various government studies
and
reports, documenting the contamination of America’s water
supplies and systems with cancer causing, health destroying
chemicals.”
. WOMEN’S DAY (Magazine) Special Report, “Lead and
Water Don’t Mix” winter 1995
“The US EPA informed Americans in May 1993 that 30 million
people face a potential problem with lead in their drinking
water. Standard monitoring required by the Safe Drinking
Water Act (SDWA) indicated that 819 medium to large public
water utilities were out of compliance with the required
maximum lead ‘action level’…the dangers posed by the lead
levels were high
enough to pose a long-term risk to the mental development of
young children.”
. IS YOUR WATER SAFE TO DRINK? (Brochure) All the
information you need to secure a safe, reliable supply of
drinking water for you and your family – Consumer
Reports Book Series 1988, Page 50 “In a national survey,
lead was found to be more than 5ppb in 906 out of 1200
groundwater samples…Children are sensitive to much lower
lead level. Studies have shown that infants and young children
are particularly susceptible to lead poisoning,
which can lead to permanent brain damage and mental
retardation.”
. THE SIERRA CLUB GUIDE TO SAFE DRINKING WATER
(Book) Scott Alan Lewis, 1996, Page 9 “A variety of toxic
chemicals, minerals and metals can contaminate drinking
water supplies either as the result of natural processes of the
environment or, more commonly, as the result of human
activity. Among the metals and inorganic chemical
contaminants that threaten drinking water supplies lead,
arsenic, mercury, and cadmium are the most important. Lead is
commonly used in pipes, faucets, and the solder used to join
components of plumbing systems in homes and other
buildings.”
. USA TODAY (Newspaper) Headline “Lead Taints Blood
of 77% of USA’s Population” November 14-16, 1986,
Page 1 “77% of the USA’s population – including 66% of all
children under 5 years old – have unsafe lead levels in their
blood” states Environmental Defense Fund scientist Ellen
Silbergeld.
. CONSUMER REPORTS (Magazine) “Should You Use A
Water Filter?” July 1997, Page 27 “Organic Chemicals in
industrial and agricultural areas, herbicides and other organic
compounds sometimes wind up in drinking waters. Some
organic pollutants are, ironically, by-products of water
chlorination systems; Chlorine combines with decaying plant
matter to make chloroform and related compounds.”
. ASSOCIATED PRESS (News Release) “Chemicals in
drinking water disclosed” February 11, 1988 Washington
– The EPA is set to unveil requirements that FOR THE FIRST
TIME will provide people with details on what chemicals are
found in their drinking water.
. CONSUMERS DIGEST (magazine) “Special Report: How
Safe is Your Water?” June 1996 Pages 63-68
“Trichloroethylene or TCE is one of the most frequently
dumped industrial solvents. TCE is believed to be a carcinogen
and
poses a number of other risks to humans. Various studies peg
the presence of TCE in up to 34% of US water supply sources.
Some ailments believed linked to TCE exposure are leukemia,
bladder cancer, speech/hearing impairment, anemia,
kidney/liver disorders, tumors and various diseases of the
nervous system.”
“Chemicals from the Tap: What’s Your Risk?”
. Chlorine by-products in the water supplies of up to 100 million
people are linked to an estimated 10,000 bladder cancers per
year . Arsenic, a known human carcinogen is found in
significant levels in the tap water of more than 50 million
Americans
. The radioactive gas radon, which dissolves in water, can be
found in the tap water of about 80 million Americans
. About 14 million people drink water contaminated with five
major toxic herbicides
. USA TODAY (Newspaper) Headline: “120 Million may
get unsafe drinking water” September 27, 1993 Page 1
“In one of the most comprehensive drinking water studies ever,
the Natural Resources Defense Council analyzed EPA records
and found ‘In 1991-92, 43% of all water supplies violated
federal health standards. There were 250,000 violations
affecting more than 120 million people.’ ‘More than 900,000
people each year become ill – and as many as 900 die – from
water borne disease.’ ‘State and Federal regulations acted on
just 3,900 of the 250,000 violations.’ ‘Non-community water
systems (hospitals, hotels and schools) had an added 40,000
violations affecting 1.1 million people.’
. WATER FIT TO DRINK (Book) A Guide to the hidden
hazards of drinking water and what you can do to
ensure a safe, good tasting supply for the home, by
Carol Keough, 1980, page 22 “A research team from the
Columbia University School of Public Health began looking into
the deaths of housewives in seven New York State counties…
The team, headed by Dr. Michael Alavanja, examined each
female death from cancer of the gastrointestinal or urinary
organs in the years 1968 to 1970…The prime suspect in these
cancer deaths was chlorine…The scientists found that women
in this study who drank chlorinated water ran a 44% greater
risk of dying from cancer of the gastrointestinal or urinary tract
than those who drank non-chlorinated water.”
. SAVE YOUR LIFE (Book) What the Medical
Establishment Won’t Tell You, by Michael L. Culbert,
1983, Pages 106-107 “Except for cigarette smoking, we
haven’t identified anything else that accounts for potentially as
much cancer as drinking water and chlorination’ according to
Dr. Robert Harris, Associate Director of the toxic chemical
program for the Environmental Defense Fund, a non-profit
consumer group. One study funded by the federal EPA found
that the death rate from cancer among those who drink
chlorinated water was 44% HIGHER than among those
who did not drink chlorinated water. A second study
indicated an elevated cancer rate in areas where chloroform is
higher. ‘Most of the dramatic decline in male potency is due to
the exposure of Americans to hazardous substances. 30%
appears to be due to manmade chlorinated chemicals found to
contaminate the human sperm.’ Evidence from the Medical
College of Georgia and the University of Arkansas
suggest that between 67% and 83% of all birth defects in the
nation are now caused by men. Too, research suggests that low
sperm counts are highly correlated with cancer.”
. THINK BEFORE YOU DRINK (Brochure) “The Failure of
the Nation’s Drinking Water System to Protect Public
Health”, Natural Resources Defense Council, September
1983, Page 1. “ We must think before we drink. Few members
of the public are aware that according to the most recent
published review of studies of actual cancer cases in the US, a
single glass of drinking water contaminants is associated with
10,700 or more bladder and rectal cancers per year – about 30
cancers per day…a recent study by the Federal Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention estimating that 940,000 people
become ill each year from consuming contaminated water and
that 900 of those people die each year.”
. US NEWS AND WORLD REPORT (Magazine) “Just How
Safe is Our Drinking Water?” January 19, 1981, Page
65.0 “The Council on Environmental Quality cited new studies
linking chlorine, used to treat water consumed by about 75% of
the population, with an increased cancer risk. The studies
found the risk to drinkers of chlorinated water total higher by
13-93%
for rectal cancer, and about 53% for colon and bladder
cancer…Chlorine itself is not the culprit but rather is the
organic compounds such as chloroform that result when
chlorine combines with organic matter in raw water.”
. US NEWS AND WORLD REPORT (Magazine “Warning:
Your Drinking Water May be Dangerous” January 16,
1984, Page 51
“ Chemicals, gasoline, wastes – they’re all contaminating the
nation’s water supplies far worse than anyone expected. Unless
action is taken quickly to stop the encroachment of these
contaminants, authorities warn, the nation will face an
enormous health emergency.”
. GOOD HOUSEKEEPING (Magazine) “The New Fears and
Facts about the Water You Drink.” February 1981, Page
201 “ A clear and present danger – some 40 to 60 million tons
of dangerous chemical wastes are produced each year…
careless and illegal dumping of poisonous chemical wastes has
been widespread…wastes leach into streams that supply
community water. Chlorination can cause pollution in itself;
chlorine can react with organic matter in the water to form
trihalomethanes (THMs), organic compounds such as
chloroform – which if taken in excess or over a long period of
time – can be harmful. THMs have been shown to cause
cancer…thousands of human deaths indicate that over a
lifetime chlorinated water may increase the risk of
gastrointestinal cancer by up to 50-100%.”
Water versus Coke
WATER
1. 75% of Americans are chronically dehydrated.
2. In 37% of Americans, the thirst mechanism is so weak that it is often
mistaken for hunger.
3. Even MILD dehydration will slow down one's metabolism as much as 3%.
4. One glass of water will shut down midnight hunger pangs for almost 100% of
the dieters studied in a U-Washington study.
5. Lack of water, the #1 trigger of daytime fatigue.
6. Preliminary research indicates that 8-10 glasses of water a day could
significantly ease back and joint pain for up to 80% of
sufferers.
7. A mere 2% drop in body water can trigger fuzzy short-term memory, trouble
with basic math, and difficulty focusing on the computer screen or on a printed
page.
8. Drinking 5 glasses of water daily decreases the risk of colon cancer by 45%,
plus it can slash the risk of breast cancer by 79%, and one is 50% less likely to
develop bladder cancer. Are you drinking the amount of water you should every
day?
COKE
1. In many states (in the USA) the highway patrol carries two gallons of Coke
in the truck to remove blood from the highway after a car accident.
2. You can put a T-bone steak in a bowl of coke and it will be gone in two days.
3. To clean a toilet: Pour a can of Coca-Cola into the toilet bowl and let the
"real thing" sit for one hour, then flush clean. The citric acid in Coke removes
stains.
4. To remove rust spots from chrome car bumpers: Rub the bumper with a
rumpled-up piece of Reynolds Wrap aluminum foil dipped in Coca-Cola.
5. To clean corrosion from car battery terminals: Pour a can of Coca-Cola over
the terminals to bubble away the corrosion.
6. To loosen a rusted bolt: Applying a cloth soaked in Coca-Cola to the rusted
bolt for several minutes.
7. To bake a moist ham: Empty a can of Coca-Cola into the baking pan, wrap
the ham in aluminum foil, and bake. Thirty minutes before the ham is finished,
remove the foil, allowing the drippings to mix with the Coke for a scrumptious
brown gravy.
8. To remove grease from clothes: Empty a can of coke into a load of greasy
clothes, add detergent, and run through a regular cycle.
The Coca-Cola will help loosen grease stains. It will also clean road haze from
your windshield.
For Your Info
1. The active ingredient in Coke is phosphoric acid. Its pH is 2.8 (very acidic -
cancer can only thrive in an acidic environment in the body). It will dissolve a
nail in about 4 days. Phosphoric acid also leaches calcium from bones and is a
major contributor to the rising increase in osteoporosis.
2. To carry Coca-Cola syrup (the concentrate) the commercial truck must use
the hazardous material place cards reserved for highly corrosive materials.
3. The distributors of coke have been using it to clean the engines of their trucks
for about 20 years!
Now the question is, would you like a glass of water or coke?
ADD Research Study
http://www.cogreslab.demon.co.uk/Magnetsmed.htm
From: cogreslab@aol.com
Dr. Bernard Margolis of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, reported at the North
American Academy of Magnetic Therapy in 1998 that he had treated 30
children with ADD aged 5 to 18, of whom all but two were male. 19 reported
significant improvements in the first week, as judged subjectively by their best
judges, the parents, one of whom said "It was like night and day with him. He
was lovable with magnets and without, he was up for adoption". I carried out a
study some years on a small group of hyperactive children. I discovered that
these children displayed increasing severity of hyperactivity with increasing
nocturnal 50Hz. electric field exposure. One might begin to formulate the
hypothesis from these observations that moving electric fields are stressors, as
suggested also by Martin Blank of Columbia University, NY, (Blank 1992) and
that static magnetic fields are calmant. After all, what has changed on the planet
with the advent of our new and convenient technologies is the A.C. electric
field. The static magnetic field has always, in the guise of the gentle
geomagnetic field of Mother Earth, been with us during our entire evolution.
Roger Coghill

ATTENTION/BEHAVIOR ISSUES AND THE USE OF MAGNETIC

PRODUCTS
From: Dr. Barney Margolis' phone number: 717-233-4211 E-mail:
docbarney@earthlink.net
The following 14 testimonials were collected by Dr. Margolis, a pediatrician for
36 years from Harrisburg, PA, who conducted an informal trial of magnetic
products with a number of his patients with attention and behavior issues. The
products used were Nikken’s (1) a magnetic mattress pad, (2) a magnetic
pillow, and (3) a 4” round magnet, worn over the upper chest. Each patient used
the products for a one week trial. The testimonials were provided by the
parents. What he did was offer his patients with ATTENTION PROBLEMS the
option of trying magnetics to see if they would help symptoms. They
specifically did this during vacation times so it would not interfere with school
work. They had the children’s parents fill out questionaires rating physical
behaviors, emotional and attention/memory before using the magnets, while on
them and then when taken off of them. 28 children completed the study. The
time restraint of one week was basically due to a lack of enough products. Other
children were waiting to use them.
Of the 28 children who completed this study 19 showed a significant
improvement in scores with using magnets. These children all used one or more
magnetic products. Of the children who did not respond Dr. Margolis noted that
they only used one magnetic product. The question remains as to whether they
would have responded if they had used them for longer than a week or used
additional products. (1) “With using the magnet, Christopher’s (age 10) mood
and behavior was more even throughout the day, instead of the highs and lows
on medication. It was new to have him happy and not fighting with us first
thing in the morning. His grandmother said that he seemed happier with the
magnet. Christopher’s appetite was so much better with the magnet - he ate
almost all the time!” (2) “Ian (age 11) used all three magnets: mattress pad,
pillow, and disk. During use of magnets Ian appeared to be more calm, rested,
and focused. They had almost an immediate effect. For example, on Saturday,
Aug. 3rd, after having not used the mattress pad or pillow for one night, Ian
displayed rowdy, impulsive behavior and was “out of control.” We placed the
disk magnet on his shirt at lunch
time and it calmed him almost immediately. Usually when we go to a
restaurant, Ian is unable to sit still and plays with anything and everything
within his reach. During the trial period of using the magnets, we went out to
dinner on two occasions, and he sat quietly and actually engaged in adult level
conversations with us. Although he had previously been “written up” three
times for poor behavior this summer by his day camp counselors, during this
trial week there were no reports of misbehavior. He received another written
warning last week after the trial. We are convinced that the magnets may have a
positive effect on Ian’s behavior and are interested in purchasing them to
continue the “experiment.” We would appreciate if you would call us with
information about how we can purchase the magnets. Thanks for the
opportunity to participate in the trial.
(3) “Ryan (age 11) was off treatment and medicine one day post-testing
(magnetic products trial), and was moving back to pre-testing behavior. Ryan
was more cooperative, calm, pleasant to talk to, not argumentative, during
testing. He went to bed much easier. (He recognized his own tiredness). Ryan
was not a perfect child during testing. He was more typical of his age, but
showed more ability to be worked with, reasoned with. He was quite willing to
wear the magnet. Our trouble was with
tape irritation and sweating. When Ryan is on medication, he seems suppressed,
extremely calm. That is nice to have, but I don’t think that’s really our Ryan.
During testing he was not suppressed. He could wind up but we could call him
on it and he knew and worked with himself more to settle down. During testing
Ryan seemed more like a “normal” little boy without the attention issue that
needs direction and encouragement to better his behavior.”
(4) “It was like night and day with him. He was lovable with magnets, and
without he was up for adoption!” (age 13)
(5) “Shaun (age 9) said he didn’t feel as angry after he wore the magnets for 2
days. He told me the same thing after he was on medication for 2 days.”
(6) “We started Vincent (age 5) on the mattress pad on Saturday, and by
Wednesday he started to improve substantially. His concentration and manner
improved, and he did not appear to be as belligerent. He was even asking for
some paper to draw on a couple of times, which he rarely enjoys doing. He was
able to sit for longer periods of time and work on a project, which again, rarely
happens. His attitude and demeanor improved. Sometimes he gets “mouthy,”
which, again, did not happen from Wednesday until about Saturday. On Sunday
I took the mattress pad off. Almost immediately he was back to his “normal”
self the following week.”
(7) “After using the mattress pad we viewed a positive change. We feel this will
be beneficial to Shannon.”
(8) “Sean (age 11) used the mattress and the pillow. He was pretty much the
same, but possibly a little
calmer. When we were exasperated, I sent him to his room to rest on his bed.
He seemed calmer after a rest on the magnets. I’m not sure if this is a result of
the time on the magnets or the time away from stimulation. Sean would take his
magnetic pillow downstairs at times to lay on it while he watched TV. There
was a big increase in appetite in the beginning ... that continued through the
trial.
While on medication, Sean had a little trouble falling asleep at night, but not
more than lots of other kids. While on the mattress, he fell asleep quickly, and
did sleep in every morning.”
(9) “Mike (age 7) showed no visible signs of improvement with the magnets.
Please keep us informed of ANY other non-prescriptive alternative. We
appreciate your concern and research.”
(10) “Paul (age 39, father of Mike) ... the magnet worked very well. It allowed
me to sleep soundly at
night and I was significantly more at ease during the day. The magnet reduces
irritability and reduces a tendency toward impulsivity. I noticed the changes
after wearing the magnet for about 4-6 hours!”
(11) “Jen (age 18) went off medication for 4 days before the trial. By the 4th
day I was deciding this is it. Back to medication. I didn’t even want to try the
magnet. OBNOXIOUS and BELLIGERENT, her behavior was horrible. Still
eating, but very restless and moody. We persevered until Wed. 7/10.
When she woke up, she took a shower and we placed the magnet on her chest
and hoped for the best. By Wed. evening, things were moving slowly back to
normal (whatever that may be). On Thursday she was better than the day
before. Did a complete resume (wrote, typed and edited by herself, not with the
usual 100 questions that needed to be asked) for a job. Totally impressed
friends who have been a part of her growing up years. Thought she was a
different child. Judy, my best friend and mother of 3 was amazed how much
better she was in tune, focused on herself, and proud of what she had done. On
Friday we went for her permit. Very proud of her, how well she was focused.”
I think we are headed in the right direction. Jen seemed pleased with herself.
Hoping she gets the job at the daycare. First time in a long time she has been
happy about herself or anything. Jen continued wearing the magnet until 7/19.
A few evenings she chose not to sleep with it on. When she woke up it was
quite obvious. It took her longer to get organized and settled. Once showered
and the magnet back in place, things improved. On July 20, Jen decided no
more medication; she would like to use the magnet.”
(12) “To summarize my feelings about the change: previously he was highly
agitated. That word best described his outlook and behavior. The mattress
calmed him down considerably, enabling him to deal with matters with much
more consideration. Our relationship improved substantially. By the way, I
never told him about the qualities of this mattress. He only knows that I bought
a new one because the old one was no longer comfortable ... the bed was
expensive and I felt that buying it was a bit crazy, but it has turned out to be a
great purchase. Hope it continues to provide John with the calm he needs to be
more effective in life.”
(13) 14 year old Thom was an angry, argumentative, impulsive boy, who was
also a bed-wetter. He needed to be told many times to do his chores before they
got done and homework time was very unpleasant, with lots of yelling and poor
study skills. His younger siblings (ages 6 and 8) were constantly on his nerves,
and the battles raged constantly. “Immediately after starting to use the ...
products, and getting off of medication, the amazing changes began. In 12 days
he wet his bed only twice; his mood was mostly happy. His appetite, which had
been suppressed on the medication, came back wonderfully. He has become a
warm, friendly child who is no longer angry at the world, and has become
complimentary to his mother, and cares about her feelings. His chores are
getting done willingly with no hassles; helps sometimes with the cooking and
cleaning without being asked. The behavior of his siblings doesn’t bother him
anymore, and he is now setting better examples for them. His maturity level has
leaped forward, making it possible to have a decent conversation with him. He
actually referred to his science homework as “fun” ... his mother couldn’t
believe her ears!” Due to the marvelous way he has responded to the magnets
and the happiness he is experiencing, the atmosphere in the home has changed
tremendously. His mother, who works full time in the family business, used to
dread the time she had to go home because of the stress and tension that Thom’s
behavior always caused. Now she looks forward to going home, and is
marveling at her “new” son, and enjoying him tremendously.”
(14) “Our 11 year old daughter had attention and impulsivity problems, and
used to be on medication for those problems, and used to visit her pediatrician
every 2-3 months for various reasons. In July she went off the medication and
began using (magnetic) products. She has not had to return to the doctor’s
office for one year for a routine physical, and has grown 4 inches, gained 15
pounds, and is doing very well in school.”
Alzheimer's Research Studies
PEER-REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#1
This article reports on two Alzheimer's patients who experienced significant
improvement in visual memory and drawing performance following the
external application of electromagnetic fields ranging from 5 to 8 Hz.
Improvements were also seen in other cognitive functions, including spatial
orientation, mood, shortterm memory, and social interactions.
1 Noting that the disorganization of circadian rhythm (the daily biological
clock) may be causally related to memory deterioration in old age and possibly
to Alzheimer's disease, this article argues that the use of magnetic fields could
lead to memory improvement among the elderly by means of resynchronization,
or resetting, of the circadian rhythms.2
Ankle Sprain Research Study
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
Results of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study indicated that treatment
with two 30-minute sessions of noninvasive pulsed radiofrequency therapy is
effective in significantly decreasing the time required for edema reduction in
patients suffering from lateral ankle sprains.4

References
4. A.A. Pilla & L. Kloth, "Effect of Pulsed Radio Frequency Therapy on Edema
in Ankle Sprains: A Multisite Double-Blind Clinical Study," Second World
Congress for Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine, 8-13 June
1997, Bologna, Italy, p. 300.
Arthritis Research Studies
http://www.micronauts.com/magnetic.htm
A formal study was reported at a Madras conference. Patients with arthritis,
spondylosis, and malunion of fractures were treated with pulsed magnetic fields
from .01 to 1 Hz.. The polarity and strength was not specified. Near 80% to
85% of the patients recovered and recurrence occurred in only two patients after
a two year period.
Other Arthritis Research Studies
PEER-REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC STUDY
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This study found that 3 hours of exposure to a 50-Hz magnetic field
significantly inhibited experimentally induced inflammation and suppressed
arthritis in rats.5 A noteworthy American double-blind, placebo-controlled
study on the effects of static magnets on the treatment of arthritis was recently
published in the ®MDBR¯Journal of Rheumatology®MDNM¯ (November
1997, p. 1200). The study confirms the effectiveness of magnets in relieving the
pain of arthritis. Another scientific study of similar rigor is being carried out by
Dr. Zimmerman, and is looking at the effects of fixed magnets on low back
pain. There is good reason to expect confirmation of what users have been
claiming for years--that magnets are an excellent aid to pain relief. This double-
blind, placebo-controlled study examined the effects of pulsed electrical fields
administered over a period of 4 weeks in the treatment of arthritis of the hand.
Results showed significant clinical improvement in patients receiving the
therapy relative to controls.7
In this general review article on the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis
with magnetic fields, the authors state that an alternating low-frequency
magnetic field (30-40 mT) from such generators as "Polius-1" and "Polius-
101" improves the clinical state of afflicted joints. Such treatments are normally
carried out for 30 minutes per day over a period of 15 to 20 days.8
This study examined the effects of magnetolaser therapy either itself or in
combination with conventional drugs in patients suffering from rheumatoid
arthritis. Magnetolaser therapy involved the use of an AMLT-01 device and
consisted of 6-minute exposures daily over a total of 14 days. Results showed a
marked improvement following the first 3 days of magnetolaser therapy, with
the strongest positive effects experienced by patients characterized as suffering
from mild to moderate levels of the disease. At the end of the magnetolaser
therapy course, 90 percent of patients showed improvement.9 This study
examined the effects of low-frequency magnetic fields (from a "Polius-1"
device) in patients 7 to 14 years old suffering from juvenile rheumatoid
arthritis. Treatment consisted of 10 daily exposures of 10 to 12 minutes each.
Results showed beneficial effects in 58, 76, and 37 percent of patients in each
of three experimental groups.10 This study examined the effects of low-
frequency and constant magnetic fields in patients suffering from rheumatoid
arthritis and osteoarthrosis. Low-frequency magnetic fields were shown to
produce beneficial effects in patients with both stage I and II rheumatoid
arthritis and with osteoarthrosis deformans, especially with respect to the wrists,
knees, and ankles.11
REFERENCES
5. Y. Mizushima, et al., "Effects of Magnetic Field on Inflammation,"
Experientia, 31(12), December 15, 1975, p. 1411-1412.
7. T. Zizic, et al., "The Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Hand with
Pulsed Electrical Fields," Second World Congress for Electricity and
Magnetism in Biology and Medicine, 8-13 June 1997, Bologna, Italy.
8. V.D. Grigor'eva, et al., "Therapeutic Use of Physical Factors in Complex
Therapy of Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis," Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz
Kult, (6), 1995, p. 48-51.
9. B.Y. Drozdovski, et al., "Use of Magnetolaser Therapy with an AMLT-01
Apparatus in Complex Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis," Fiz Med, 4(1-2),
1994, p. 101-102.
10. E.A. Shlyapok, et al., "Use of Alternating Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields
in Combination with Radon Baths for Treatment of Juvenile Rheumatoid
Arthritis," Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult, 4, 1992, p. 13-17.
11. V.D. Grigor'eva, et al., "Therapeutic Application of Low-Frequency and
Constant Magnetic Fields in Patients with Osteoarthritis Deformans and
Rheumatoid Arthritis," Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult, 4, 1980, p. 29-35.
Low Back Pain and Other Forms of Chronic Pain
From: http://www.tnp.com/encyclopedia/therapy/1/5/
A double-blind, placebo controlled crossover trial of 54 individuals with knee
or back pain compared an alternating polarity static magnet against a sham
magnet.38 Participants used either the real or sham device for 24 hours; then,
after a 7 day rest period, used the opposite therapy for another 24 hours.
Evaluations showed that use of the real magnet was associated with greater
improvements than the sham treatment. A double-blind placebo-controlled
crossover study used alternating-pole magnets (defined in section on How to
Use Magnet Therapy)
on 20 individuals who had chronic low back pain for at least 6 months duration;
the average length of time the participants had suffered with back pain was 19
years.6 The study found no improvement relative to the placebo group.
Pelvic Pain A double-blind placebo-controlled study of 14 women with chronic
pelvic pain found no significant benefit when magnets were applied to
abdominal trigger points for 2 weeks.7 However, statistical analysis showed
that a larger study would have been necessary to show whether magnet therapy
was effective.
Benefits of FIR on Injuries
http://www.doctorshealthsupply.com/infrared/health_facts.htm
I have found several studies that suggest the benefits of using far infrared light
on injuries: The American Journal of Geriatrics has published a study in which
elderly patients experienced an improvement of pain and disability from
degenerative osteoarthritis of the knee. A fully randomized, partially double-
blind trial resulted in a pain reduction of more than 50% within the group using
the therapy, whereas there was no significant improvement in the placebo
group. Studies done with Magnetic Resonance Imaging suggest a more rapid
recovery from muscle fatigue, as you can see in the images.
Fig. 1. After 30 minutes exercise; dark parts indicate muscle
fatigue (due to build-up of lactic acid)
Fig. 2. Instead of the usual 2-3 hours, the FAR Infrared products help muscles
recover within 20 minutes only Based on my colleague's recommendation, and
my curiosity, I have tried some of the products personally, and have found
benefits on physical ailments, as well as emotional and athletic benefits. At this
point, I had decided to look further into the explanation behind the miracle
benefits.
Staying healthy and youthful - beyond exercise and nutrition
Dr. Zane Kime, M.D., in his book "Sunlight"6 holds up the findings that
sunlight exposure is similar to physical exercise in its effects on the body, as it
improves the balance of blood pressure, blood sugar, and an increase in oxygen
in the cells, muscle strength, vitality and mental stability. Natural spectrums of
light found in sunlight, for example, are essential for bone growth as well as
preventing osteoporosis, regulating hormonal functions as well as immune
functions. It has occurred to me that light may be a great help to patients who
cannot exercise, because of health reasons, age, or lifestyle inhibitions.
The Anti-Aging Factor
As we age, we all experience a shift in our hormones, and researchers now feel
this change is responsible for many of the maladies we associate with aging,
such as menopause, sleeplessness, fatigue, arteriosclerosis, and others. In his
research in Pennsylvania at the Thomas Jefferson Medical School, Dr. George
Brainard has stated that light affects the hormonal balance of the body, in levels
of melatonin, prolactin, cortisone, testosterone, TS4, LH, FSH, T3, and thyroid
hormones. John Ott, a modern pioneer in this subject, attributes these affects to
a process similar to the photosynthesis process in plants. In this process, light is
converted by the body into electrochemical impulses that are sent to the pineal
and pituitary glands, which send the hormones through the body's central
nervous system to all the cells of the body. The hormones affected through this
process and the functioning of these glands are the growth hormone, thyroid
hormone(TSH), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), prolactin, oxytoxin,
melanocyte stimulating hormone (MSH), and anti-diuretic hormone. Therefore,
light is essential to the functioning of our entire endocrine system.7 As hormone
replacement has mixed results at times, it is possible that in the future, doctors
will prescribe light for therapy, in forms such as the FAR Infrared wraps.
Common problems associated with lifestyle and aging, such as hypertension
and osteoporosis, headaches and digestive problems, are attributed by some
scientists to be the result of excess acidity in our system.
The American Medical Journal found that in patients with bone loss, alkalizing
their system caused a decrease in bone loss. Their conclusion was that our
typical American diet is acid-producing.8 The acids deposited in our blood are
often stored by the body in forms of cholesterol, fatty acid, uric acid, and other
villains that cause havoc in our system.9 Sang Whang, the author of "Reverse
Aging" claims that these excess acids can be eliminated with the use of far
infrared products, along with consuming certain alkaline minerals and foods.10
The far infrared resonance heats up the internal temperature of the body,
increasing circulation, thus enabling the blood to melt out the acidic toxins that
have been deposited for years in one's arteries. A study done on carotid artery
buildup showed an increase in blood flow within the artery after two nights of
the subject sleeping on the FAR Infrared mattress, for an average of 10 hours a
night.11 As a doctor, I cannot recommend the wraps, as they are not FDA
approved in this country as therapies for these particular maladies. However, if
I were personally a sufferer of hypertension, or chronic arthritis, or any
systemic problem, I would use the FAR Infrared mattress or wraps for my own
health.
Negative Ions
The other element contained within the FAR Infrared technology that I
investigated was the negative ions that were claimed to increase with the use of
it. Nature's "life enhancing particles", negative ions, are molecules with an extra
electron, discovered in 1899 by two scientists named Elster and Geitel. Mice
live longer in certain cases when exposed to negative ions. They have been
linked to killing germs, and preventing infections. Dr. Igho Hart Kornblueh, a
physician, found that patients recovered 57% faster from surgery when exposed
to large doses of negative ions. It has also been found that negative ions seem to
help with allergies, migraines, and sinus problems.12 Although negative ions
are plentiful in nature (occurring at almost twice the amount near the ocean or
waterfalls as normal), our environment is sadly lacking these energetic boosters.
Dr. William Rea, Chief of surgery at Brookhaven Medical Center in Texas,
states that "Most houses don't breathe like they used to". Steel and concrete
absorb most of the available negative ions in the atmosphere, and plastics have
a positive static charge, so that the amount of negative ions that we receive is
extremely minimal. Emotional problems? Blame it on the ions, or the lack of
them. The opposite of negative ions, positive ions, are particles with a missing
electron. In certain courts, the issue of winds that bring in positive ions has been
used as an excuse for erratic and criminal behavior. On the contrary, negative
ions promote alpha brain waves, creating a calming effect. Dr. Albert P.
Krueger, an American scientist well respected for his extensive work with ions,
discovered that negative ions affect the rate at which serotonin is oxidized in the
bloodstream. Serotonin is secreted by the pineal glands and intestines, and
affects sleep, mood, nerveimpulses, blood-clotting, and contraction of smooth
muscles. It is most popularly associated with feelings of security, peace, and
satisfaction. Negative ions have been shown to reduce neurosis and anxiety.13
This may explain why so many people sing in the shower, or why one can't
seem to fully wake up without one. When the water falls in the shower, it
creates negative ions. Negative ions are also found plentifully around waterfalls
and oceans. Vasil'yev, a Russian ion pioneer, showed in the 1970's that ions act
on the endings of pulmonary afferent nerve fibers, and alter the functional state
of the central nervous system, and through it, the peripheral organs
The FAR Infrared material that I research also was shown to increase the rate of
negative ions. This should be a relief for all of us who don't live or work at
waterfalls or on the ocean shore. The people that I interviewed seemed to notice
the calming effect of wearing the wraps, although they weren't told of this effect
prior to wearing them.
As I approach my upper years, I am elated to use technology such as this to
enhance my daily life, and increase my chances of living healthy long past my
90th birthday. I hope that you have the same opportunity.
Bone Fracture Research Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This study examined the effects of bone grafting and pulsed electromagnetic
fields on a group of 83 adults with ununited fractures. Results showed a
successful healing rate of 87 percent in the 38 patients originally treated with
bone grafts and PEMF for ununited fractures with wide gaps, synovial
pseudarthrosis, and malalignment. A healing rate of 93 percent was shown
among the 45 patients who had initially been unsuccessfully treated with PEMF
alone and had bone-grafting and were re-treated with pulsing electromagnetic
fields.
14 This study examined the effects of pulsing electromagnetic fields on 125
patients suffering from ununited fractures of the tibial diaphysis. Results
showed a healing rate of 87 percent.
15 Results of this study showed treatment with pulsed electromagnetic fields
resulted in an overall success rate of at least 75 percent in
patients suffering from tibial lesions.
16 This review article makes the following observations with respect to the use
of pulsed electromagnetic fields in treating ununited fractures, failed
arthrodeses, and congenital pseudarthroses. The treatment has been shown to be
more than 90 percent effective in adult patients. In cases where union does not
occur with PEMFs alone after approximately four months, PEMF treatment
coupled with fresh bone grafts ensures a maximum failure rate of only 1 to 1.5
percent. For those with delayed union three to four months following fracture,
PEMFs appear to be more successful than in patients treated with other
conservative methods. For more serious conditions, including infected
nonunions, multiple surgical failures, long-standing atrophic lesions, failed knee
arthrodeses after removal of infected prostheses, and congenital pseudarthroses,
PEMF treatment has exhibited success in most patients.
17 Results of this study found that 35 of 44 nonunited scaphoid fractures 6
months or older healed in a mean time of 4.3 months during pulsed
electromagnetic field treatment using external coils and a thumb spica cast. 18
This double-blind, placebo-controlled study examined the effects of pulsed
electromagnetic fields in femoral neck fracture patients undergoing
conventional therapy. PEMF treatment was started within two weeks of
fracture, and patients were instructed to make use of the electromagnetic device
for 8 hours per day over a 90-day period. Results showed beneficial effects
relative to controls after 18 months of follow-up.
19 This review article on pulsing electromagnetic fields in the treatment of bone
fracture observes that the surgically noninvasive outpatient method approved by
the FDA in 1979 produced confirmed end results in 1007 ununited fractures and
71 failed arthrodeses, with an overall success rate at Columbia-Presbyterian
Medical Center of 81 percent; an international success rate of 79 percent, and a
success rate with other patients in the U.S. of 76 percent.
22 Results of this double-blind study showed significant healing effects of low-
frequency pulsing electromagnetic fields in patients treated with femoral
intertrochanteric osteotomy for hip degenerative arthritis.
25 In this study, 147 patients with fractures of the tibia, femur, and humerus
who had failed to benefit from surgery received treatment with external skeletal
fixation in situ and pulsed electromagnetic fields. Results indicated an overall
success rate of 73 percent. Femur union was seen in 81 percent and tibia union
in 75 percent\
26 This study examined the effects of extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic
fields (1-1000 Hz, 4 gauss) on new bone fractures of female patients. Results
led the authors to suggest that EMF treatment accelerates the early stages of
fracture healing.
27 This study examined the preventive effects of low-frequency pulsing
electromagnetic fields against delayed union in rat fibular osteotomies and
diaphyseal tibia fractures in humans. Results indicated such treatment
modulated and accelerated fracture union in both groups
29 This article discusses the cases of two children with bone malunion
following lengthening of congenitally shortened lower legs. Pulsed sinusoidal
magnetic field treatment was beneficial for both patients.
30 Results of this study showed that 13 of 15 cases of long-bone nonunion
treated with pulsed electromagnetic fields in combination with Denham external
fixator united within several months.
31 Results of this study found electromagnetic field stimulation to be an
effective treatment for nonunion among a group of 37 French patients.
32 Results of this study found treatment induced pulsing to be beneficial in
patients suffering from nonunions unresponsive to surgery.
33 In this interview with Dr. C. Andrew L. Bassett, a physician researching the
use of pulsed electromagnetic fields for the past 30 years at Columbia
University's Orthopedic Research Lab, Dr. Bassett notes that approximately
10,000 of the 12,000-plus orthopedic surgeons in the U.S. have used pulsed
electromagnetic fields on at least one patient. Many such surgeons have
incorporated the therapy on a more regular basis. He estimates that a total of at
least 65,000 patients nationwide have received the treatment, with a probable
success rate of between 80 and 90 percent. Use of the treatment has been
primarily in patients suffering from nonunited fractures, fusion failures, and
pseudoarthrosis
34 Results of this study showed pulsed electromagnetic fields to have beneficial
healing effects in patients suffering from difficult to treat and surgically
resistant bone nonunions.
35 This review article notes that the use of pulsed electromagnetic fields began
in 1974, and that 250,000 nonunion patients have received the treatment since.
The author argues that success rates are comparable to those of bone grafting,
and that PEMF treatment is more cost-effective and free of side effects. The
FDA approved PEMF use in 1982, although it remains widely unused due to
physician misunderstanding and lack of knowledge concerning the treatment
36 This 7-year study examined data on more than 11,000 cases of nonunions
treated with pulsed electromagnetic fields for up to 10 to 12
hours per day. Results indicated an overall success rate of 75 percent.
37 This study examined the effects of low-frequency electromagnetic fields (1-
1000 Hz) on middle-aged female patients suffering from fresh radius fractures.
Results showed significant increases in scintimetric activity surrounding the
fracture area after two weeks of EMF treatment relative to controls
.38 This study examined the effects of constant magnetic fields in patients
suffering from fractures. Results showed that magnetic exposure reduced pain
and the onset of edema shortly after trauma. Where edema was already present,
the treatment exhibited marked anti-inflammatory effects. The strongest
beneficial effects occurred in patients suffering from fractures of the ankle
joints.
39 Results of this study found that 10 hours per day of electromagnetic
stimulation (1.0-1.5 mV) produced complete union in 23of 26 patients receiving
the treatment for nonjoined fractures.
40 This review article looks at the history of pulsed electromagnetic fields as a
means of bone repair. The author argues that success rates have been either
superior or equivalent to those of surgery, with PEMF free of side effects and
risk.
41
References
14. C.A. Bassett, et al., "Treatment of Therapeutically Resistant Non-unions
with Bone Grafts and Pulsing Electromagnetic Fields," Journal of Bone Joint
Surg, 64(8), October 1982, p. 1214-1220.
15. C.A. Bassett, et al., "Treatment of Ununited Tibial Diaphyseal Fractures
with Pulsing Electromagnetic Fields," Journal of Bone Joint Surg, 63(4), April
1981, p. 511-523.
16. M.W. Meskens, et al., "Treatment of Delayed Union and Nonunion of the
Tibia Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields. A Retrospective Follow-up," Bull Hosp Jt
Dis Orthop Inst, 48(2), Fall 1988, p. 170-175.
17. C.A. Bassett, "The Development and Application of Pulsed Electromagnetic
Fields (PEMFs) for Ununited Fractures and Arthrodeses," Clin Plast Surg,
12(2), April 1985, p. 259-277.
18. G.K. Frykman, et al., "Treatment of Nonunited Scaphoid Fractures Pulsed
Electromagnetic Field and Cast," Journal of Hand Surg, 11(3), May 1986, p.
344-349.
19. E. Betti, et al., "Effect of Electromagnetic Field Stimulation on Fractures of
the Femoral Neck. A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study," Second
World Congress for Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine, 8-13
June 1997, Bologna, Italy.
22. C.A. Bassett, et al., "Pulsing Electromagnetic Field Treatment in Ununited
Fractures and Failed Arthrodeses," JAMA, 247(5), February 5, 1982, p. 623-
628.
25. G. Borsalino, et al., "Electrical Stimulation of Human Femoral
Intertrochanteric Osteotomies. Double-Blind Study," Clin Orthop, (237),
December 1988, p. 256-263.
26. M. Marcer, et al., "Results of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMFs) in
Ununited Fractures after External Skeletal Fixation," Clin Orthop, (190),
November 1984, p. 260-265.
27. O. Wahlstrom, "Stimulation of Fracture Healing with Electromagnetic
Fields of Extremely Low Frequency (EMF of ELF)," Clin Orthop, (186), June
1984, p. 293-301.
29. G. Fontanesi, et al., "Slow Healing Fractures: Can They be Prevented?
(Results of Electrical Stimulation in Fibular Osteotomies in Rats and in
Diaphyseal Fractures of the Tibia in Humans)," Italian Journal of Orthop
Traumatol, 12(3), September 1986, p. 371-385.
30. F. Rajewski & W. Marciniak, "Use of Magnetotherapy for Treatment of
Bone Malunion in Limb Lengthening. Preliminary Report," Chir Narzadow
Ruchu Ortop Pol, 57(1-3), 1992, p. 247-249.
31. R.B. Simonis, et al., "The Treatment of Non-union Pulsed Electromagnetic
Fields Combined with a Denham External Fixator," Injury, 15(4), January 1984,
p. 255-260.
32. L. Sedel, et al., "Acceleration of Repair of Non-unions Electromagnetic
Fields," Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot, 67(1), 1981, p. 11-23.
33. J.C. Mulier & F. Spaas, "Out-patient Treatment of Surgically Resistant
Non-unions Induced Pulsing Current - Clinical Results," Arch Orthop Trauma
Surg, 97(4), 1980, p. 293-297.
34. C.A. Bassett, "Conversations with C. Andrew L. Bassett, M.D. Pulsed
Electromagnetic Fields. A Noninvasive Therapeutic Modality for Fracture
Nonunion (Interview)," Orthop. Review, 15(12), 1986, p. 781-795.
35. B.T. O'Connor, "Treatment of Surgically Resistant Non-unions with Pulsed
Electromagnetifc Fields," Reconstr Surg Traumatology, 19, 1985, p. 123-132.
36. A. Bassett, "Therapeutic Uses of Electric and Magnetic Fields in
Orthopedics," in D.O. Carpenter & S. Ayrapetyan, (eds.), Biological Effects of
Electric and Magnetic Fields. Volume II: Beneficial and Harmful Effects, San
Diego: Academic Press, 1994, p. 13-48.
37. A.A. Goldberg, "Computer Analysis of Data on More than 11,000 Cases of
Ununited Fracture Submitted for Treatment with Pulsing Electromagnetic
Fields," Bioelectrical Repair and Growth Society, Second Annual Meeting, 20-
22 September 1982, Oxford, UK, p. 61.
38. O. Wahlstrom, "Electromagnetic Fields Used in the Treatment of Fresh
Fractures of the Radius," Bioelectrical Repair and Growth Society, Second
Annual Meeting, 20-22 September 1982, Oxford, UK, p. 26.
39. G.B. Gromak & G.A. Lacis, "Evaluations of the Efficacy of Using a
Constant Magnetic Field in Treatment of Patients with Traumas," in I. Detlav,
(ed.), Electromagnetic Therapy of Injuries and Diseases of the Support-Motor
Apparatus. International Collection of Papers, Riga, Latvia: Riga Medical
Institute, 1987, p. 88-95.
40. A.F. Lynch & P. MacAuley, "Treatment of Bone Non-Union
Electromagnetic Therapy," Ir Journal of Med Sci, 154(4), 1985, p. 153-155.
41. C.A.L. Bassett, "Historical Overview of PEM-Assisted Bone and Tissue
Healing," Bioelectromagnetics Society, 10th Annual Meeting, 19-24 June 1988,
Stamford, CT, p. 19.
Brain Injuries Research Studies
http://www.micronauts.com/magnetic.htm
At a Madras conference reported were 100 cases who were divided into two
groups: one received pulsed magnetic field treatments and the others didn't. The
first group showed improvement by clinical assessments and CT scans. The
treatments appeared to show an increase in sodium ion flow, reduction in
swelling, and a speed-up of tissue repair (compared to normal).
Bronchitis Research Study
http://www.cogreslab.demon.co.uk/Magnetsmed.htm
With bronchitis static magnets can play a much greater role than is currently the
case in conventional medical practice. 24 children aged 5-6 years suffering
from chronic bronchitis were exposed to static magnets of 100-300 gauss for 3
hours and for 30 sessions. These were compared with a 16-child control group.
In the exposed group cough and dyspnoea decreased and there was a
comparable improvement as measured by pneumotachography compared with
controls (Yashchenko et al., 1988). Other paediatric studies on patients with
Perthes disease using static magnets of 200-400 gauss for up to 24 hours and
over periods from 40 days to 6 months reported improvement in hip mobility,
analgesic effects, and in the post exposure periods these improvements
continued (Degen et al., 1977; Dolganova, Dolganov et al., 1985).
Cancer Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
Results of this study found that prolonged exposure to a 7-tesla uniform static
magnetic field for a period of 64 hours inhibited growth of three human tumor
cell lines in vitro.43 This study examined the effects of a rotational magnetic
field on a group of 51 breast cancer patients. Results showed a significant
positive response in 27 of them.44
Results of this study indicated that exposure to a rotational magnetic field
inhibited Walker's carcinoma tumor growth as much as 90 percent in some
cases
.45 Results of this study indicated that pulsed magnetic field stimulation
increased the incorporation of antitumor agents into cells, and thus increased
antitumor activity shifting the cell cycle to a proliferative from a
nonproliferative phase
46 Results of this study found that 20-30 sessions of magnetotherapy
administered preoperatively exhibited antitumor effects in patients
suffering from lung cancer.
47This study examined the effects of microwave resonance therapy (MRT) in
patients suffering from various forms of cancer. Results showed that MRT
treatment prior to surgery reduced the spread of cancer-associated conditions
and reduced the risk associated with surgery in 87 percent of patients. MRT
applied postoperatively had beneficial effects in 68 percent
.50 Results of this study proved that the combination of weak pulsed
electromagnetic fields with antioxidant supplementation is beneficial
in the treatment of patients suffering from tongue cancer, improving speech,
pain control, and tolerance to chemotherapy
51 Results of this controlled study indicated that treatment with a constant
magnetic field significantly improved long-term (3-year) survival time in
patients undergoing radiation therapy for cancer of the throat. Constant
magnetic field therapy consisted of the application of 300 mT for 30 minutes to
tumor and metastasizing regions immediately prior to each irradiation.52
Results of this Russian study indicated that the use of whole body eddy
magnetic fields, coupled with more conventional cancer therapies (including
magnetotherapy) is effective in the treatment of patients suffering from a
variety of different malignancies.53 This article reports on the case of a 48-
year-old-woman with breast cancer who was treated successfully with
magnetotherapy. Infiltration showed a marked decrease following 30 whole
body exposures to an eddy magnetic field for 60 minutes. One metastatic node
disappeared while the size of others was reduced following 60 such exposures.
A total regression of tumor and metastases was seen following the completion
of a course of 110 exposures.54 This study examined the effects of whole body
magnetic fields (16.5-35 G, 50-165 Hz) on patients suffering from different
forms of
cancer. Treatment consisted of 15 cycles, each 1-20 minutes in duration, and
was coupled with more traditional cancer therapies. Results showed that the
magnetotherapy had overall beneficial effects, particularly with respect to
improved immune status and postoperative recovery.55

References
43. R.R. Raylman, et al., "Exposure to Strong Static Magnetic Field Slows the
Growth of Human Cancer Cells in Vitro," Bioelectromagnetics, 17(5), 1996, p.
358-3 3.
44. N.G. Bakhmutskii, et al., "The Assessment of the Efficacy of the Effect of a
Rotational Magnetic Field on the Course of the Tumor Process in Patients with
Generalized Breast Cancer," Sov Med, (7), 1991, p. 25-27.
45. N.G. Bakhmutskii, et al., "The Growth Dynamics of Walker
Carcinosarcoma During Exposure to a Magnetic Eddy Field," Vopr Onkol,
37(6), 1991, p. 705-708.
46. Y. Omote, "An Experimental Attempt to Potentiate Therapeutic Effects of
Combined Use of Pulsing Magnetic Fields and Antitumor Agents," Nippon
Geka Gakkai Zasshi, 89(8), August 1988, p. 1155-1166.
47. L.S. Ogorodnikova, et al., "Morphological Criteria of Lung Cancer
Regression Under the Effect of Magnetotherapy," Vopr Onkol, 26(1), 1980, p.
28-34.
50. D.V. Miasoedov, et al., "Experience with the Use of Microwave Resonance
Therapy as a Modifying Factor in Oncological Therapy," Abstracts of the First
All-Union Symposium with International Participation, May 10 13, 1989, Kiev,
Ukraine, p. 313-315.
51. U. Randoll & R.M. Pangan, "The Role of Complex Biophysical-Chemical
Therapies for Cancer," Bioelectrochem Bioenerg, 27(3), 1992, p. 341-346.
52. V.G. Andreev, et al., "Radiomodifying Effect of a Constant Magnetic Field
in Radiation Therapy of Patients with Cancer of the Throat," Fizicheskaia
Meditzina, 4(1-2), 1994, p. 92.
53. V. Smirnova, "Anti-Tumorigenic Action of an Eddy Magnetic Field,"
Vrach, 2, 1994, p. 25-26.
54. N.G. Bakhmutskii, et al., "A Case of Successful Treatment of a Patient with
Breast Cancer Using a Rotating Electromagnetic Field," Soviet Medicine, 8,
1991, p. 86-87.
55. V.A. Lubennikov, et al., "First Experience in Using a Whole-Body
Magnetic Field Exposure in Treating Cancer Patients," Vopr Onkol, 41(2),
1995, p. 140-141.
Magnets, Acupressure Studied to Ease Cancer Therapy 'Hot Flashes'
http://www.mc.vanderbilt.edu/reporter/index.html?ID=859
Hot flashes, a well-known symptom of menopause, can be a very bothersome
side effect of treatment for many breast cancer survivors
- and one with few good options for relief.
Now, a Vanderbilt University School of Nursing researcher in the Vanderbilt-
Ingram Cancer Center is taking a cue from Chinese medicine in an effort to
develop a safe, effective strategy to ease cancer therapy-induced hot flashes.
Janet S. Carpenter, Ph.D., assistant professor of Nursing, is investigating
magnetic devices placed on strategic acupressure points to gauge their potential
ability to relieve hot flashes - periods of overheating, sweating and flushing
triggered by fluctuations in hormone levels.
"Almost two-thirds of women who have been treated for breast cancer have hot
flashes," said Carpenter, who published a paper in the journal Cancer last year
documenting the prevalence and severity of hot flashes among breast cancer
survivors. "In our study, 65 percent said they'd experienced hot flashes in the
previous two weeks. In addition, 59 percent said they were extremely severe
and 44 percent said they were extremely bothered by them."
Using a 24-hour monitoring device, Carpenter and her colleagues at the
University of Kentucky also found that women experienced hot flashes
throughout the night. Some breast cancer survivors experienced seven to eight
hot flashes each night.
"Even if these women do not wake up, their sleep is probably being disturbed,"
said Carpenter, who joined Vanderbilt's School of Nursing and Cancer Center
last August. "Fatigue can be a significant side effect of cancer treatment. Hot
flashes, and the sleep disruption that results, could contribute to that fatigue as
well as lead to feelings of depression." Menopausal symptoms including hot
flashes but night sweats, vaginal dryness, sleep disturbances and mood
alteration are also a significant problem for patients, said Dr. Brenda P.
Nicholson, assistant professor of Medicine and breast cancer specialist in the
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center. Carpenter's research, which is also aimed at
learning more about intensity, initiation and duration of hot flashes among
breast cancer survivors, will be very helpful in better defining the extent of the
extent of the problem, Nicholson said. In menopause, hot flashes are triggered
by natural hormonal fluctuations that occur as the ovaries stop producing the
female hormone estrogen. For pre-menopausal breast cancer survivors, hot
flashes may be the result of early artificial menopause triggered by
chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. In addition, many women with breast
cancer also take the estrogen-like drug tamoxifen for five years after completion
of their initial treatment in an effort to prevent cancer recurrence. Tamoxifen
commonly causes hot flashes. For healthy women, menopausal symptoms are
often alleviated with hormone replacement therapy. However, hormone
replacement is not generally recommended for women with a history of breast
cancer because of concern that it will increase the risk of recurrence.
"Alternatives to hormone replacement, such as plant estrogens, are not well-
researched for their safety in any women, but particularly in this group,"
Carpenter said. Other researchers at Vanderbilt Medical Center have
demonstrated effectiveness of magnetic therapy in the treatment of chronic pain
and nausea, Carpenter said, adding that in those cases, placement of the
magnets has correlated with acupressure points for those symptoms.
"There are also acupressure points for hot flashes," she said. "Magnetic therapy
has not been studied in the treatment of hot flashes before, but magnetic devices
really have no negative side effects in comparison to medications. We also
suspect, based on the pain research, that they will act quickly, in a matter of
hours. Some medications for hot flashes take three or four weeks to take effect."
The Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center is funding the pilot study, which will
compare the experiences of 20 women using two different magnetic devices.
VUMC's Institutional Review Board, which must authorize any research
involving patients, has approved the study. To be eligible, women must have
completed or be completing first-time treatment for breast cancer and
experiencing hot flashes. After a 24-hour monitoring period, participants will
wear six of one type of magnetic devices on acupressure points on their ankles,
lower abdomen and lower back for three days, followe by a post-treatment
measurement. After a 10-day resting period, they will switch to the other device
and follow the same routine. Carpenter is also conducting a survey of 70 breast
cancer survivors to learn more about the initiation, duration and intensity of hot
flashes. She is recruiting healthy women, ages 50-80, to complete the survey as
a comparison group. Women will each receive $5 to complete the survey and
return it by mail. The survey takes about 30 minutes to complete, and any of
the healthy women who are experiencing hot flashes will be asked to keep a
two-day diary of their symptoms. To learn more about the intervention study or
to participate in the survey, contact Janet Carpenter at 322-0282 or the
Vanderbilt- Ingram Cancer Center Information Program at 1-800-811-8480.
Cardiovascular/Coronary Heart Disease
PEER-REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC STUDY
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
Results of this study found that the addition of magnetotherapy to the treatment
of patients suffering from ischemic heart disease and osteochondrosis led to
clinical improvements.57 Results of this study involving 23 parasystolic
children found that low-frequency magnetic field exposure improved humoral
and cellular processes involved in the regulation of cardiac rhythm.58 The
authors of this study report on their development of a polymagnetic system
called Avrora-MK-01 used to administer impulse magnetic fields to diseases of
the leg vessels. Results indicated positive effects on peripheral capillaries in 75-
82 percent of patients receiving the treatment at a pre-gangrene stage.59 Results
of this study showed exposure to low-frequency alternating magnetic fields had
beneficial effects in children with primary arterial hypertension, as seen in the
attenuation of sympathetic and vagotonic symptoms.60 this study demonstrated
that traveling pulsed magnetic field and magnetic laser treatment produced
beneficial effects in patients uffering from the initial stages of essential
hypertension.61 n this article, the authors propose a new approach to treating
atherosclerosis through the alteration of biophysical properties both
ntracellularly and extracellularly. Citing their own preliminary data, they
suggest atherosclerotic lesions might be selectively resolved ithout harming
normal blood vessels allowing the lesions to take up the magnetically excitable
submicron particles and then pplying an external alternating electromagnetic
field.62 his study examined the effects of constant MKM2-1 magnets on
essential hypertension patients. Results indicated the treatment ecreased arterial
pressure in stage II patients, with magnetotherapy being shown to produce
beneficial effects on the central emodynamics and microcirculation.63 esults
from several recent studies conducted the author are reviewed. Conclusions are
that pulsed electromagnetic fields exhibit rotective effects against necrosis from
acute ischemia in rats, cerebral infarcts in rabbits, and myocardium infarcts in
rats.64 his study examined the effects of extremely high frequency
electromagnetic radiation (EHF EMR) in 93 patients suffering ischemic eart
disease. EHF treatment consisted of 10 to 15 exposures of the lower end of the
sternum from a 'Yav'-1-7,1 device. Treatment as performed five times weekly
for a total of 30 minutes per day, with drug therapy being maintained during
this period. Positive esults tended to occur after 5 to 6 treatment sessions, with a
good or satisfactory response being reported in 82 of 93 patients, and asting as
long as 11 months after hospital release.65 his review article concerning the
clinical application of electromagnetic fields notes that microwave therapy has
been shown to mprove local circulation and vascular tone, increase the volume
of functional capillaries, lower hypertension, stimulate protein and arbohydrate
metabolism, stimulate the pituitary-adrenal system, produce anti-inflammatory
effects, and improve digestive organ unction. Studies have shown decimeter
wave therapy capable of stimulating the secretory function of the stomach, as
well as blood irculation, respiratory function, and the immune system. Side
effects have been reported in both human and animal studies.67 n this study, 30
myocardial infarction patients received millimeter-wave (MW) therapy in the
form of 10 exposures of 30 minutes per ay, with a 2-day interruption after the
fifth exposure. Patients continued conventional drug treatment during the MW
therapy period. etter results were seen in those patients exposed to the MW
therapy relative to an equal number of patients receiving conventional reatment
only.68 his study examined the effects of millimeter wave therapy in
approximately 450 patients suffering from a variety of diseases, ncluding those
of the musculoskeletal, digestive, pulmonary, and nervous systems. Treatment
consisted of 25-30 minutes per day sing the "Porog-1" apparatus and generally
lasted for a period of up to 10 days. Results showed positive effects in over 87
percent of he patients.69 esults of this study found that the use of magnetophore
therapy (constant magnets applied to adrenal regions 10 hours per day for 15
days) significantly improved symptoms associated with hypertension in about
35 percent of patients studied, with mild improvement een in 30 percent, and no
improvement in 35 percent. Patients receiving decimeter-band waves (460
MHz, field intensity of 35-45 W, or 10-15 minutes per day for a total of 15
days) experienced similar results.70 esults of this placebo-controlled study
demonstrated a 76-percent effectiveness rate for running impulse magnetic field
therapy in a roup of arterial hypertensive patients. Treatment consisted of two
25-minute exposures per day over a period of 10-20 total xposures, at
frequencies of 10 or 100 Hz and magnetic field intensity of 3 or 10 mT.71 this
study examined the efficacy of the reinfusion of autologous blood following
magnetic field exposure in hypertensive patients. Positive effects were found in
92 percent of patients receiving the treatment.73 This double-blind, placebo-
controlled study examined the effects of magnetotherapy in patients suffering
from first- or second-stage hypertension. A magnetic field of 50 Hz, 15-25 mT
was applied to acupuncture points He-Gu and Shen'-Men for 15-20 seconds per
day for a total of 9-10 days. Results: The treatment improved headaches in 88
percent of patients, dizziness in 89 percent, and irritability in 88 percent. In
general, 95 percent of hypertensive patients experienced beneficial effects from
the treatment, and the morbidity rate decreased twofold following one course
extended over a period of 5-6 months.74 This placebo-controlled study
examined the effects of constant and of running magnetic fields in patients
suffering from stage II hypertension. Results found that constant magnetic
fields exhibited benefits in 68 percent of patients treated, and running magnetic
fields were helpful in 78 percent. Only 30 percent of controls showed
improvement. Constant magnetic field treatment consisted of constant magnets
applied to the inner side of the wrist on each hand for 35-40 minutes daily over
a period of 7-10 days. Running magnetic field treatment involved the use of a
"Alimp-1" apparatus for 20 minutes per day for a total of 12-15 days.76 This
double-blind, placebo-controlled study found that magnetotherapy was effective
in the treatment of symptoms associated with stage II hypertension, such as
headache, dizziness, and cardiodynia. The therapy consisted of permanent
circular magnets (16 mT) applied to the inner forearm for 30-45 minutes per
day over a period of 10 sessions.77 This controlled study examined the effects
of magnetotherapy in patients suffering from neurocirculatory hypotension (low
blood pressure) or hypertension (high blood pressure). Treatment consisted of a
running pulsed magnetic field generated an "ALIMP" device (0.5 mT, 300 Hz)
administered for 20 minutes per day over a course of 10 days. Patients suffering
from hypotension did not benefit significantly from the magnetotherapy.
Hypertension patients, however, showed a marked improvement with respect to
symptoms including headache, chest pain, extremity numbness, abnormal
systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and work capacity.80 This double-blind,
placebo-controlled study found that low-frequency, low-intensity electrostatic
fields (40-62 Hz) administered for 12-14 minutes per day helped normalize
blood pressure in patients suffering from hypertension.81 This study examined
the effects of low-frequency alternating magnetic fields in patients suffering
from arteriosclerosis or osteoarthrosis deformans. Treatment involved 10-15
minute daily leg exposures over a total of 15 days. Results showed the
treatment to be effective in 80 percent of arteriosclerosis patients and 70 percent
of those with osteoarthrosis deformans.82 This study examined the effects of
low-frequency magnetic fields (25 mT) in patients suffering atherosclerotic
encephalopathy. Treatment involved 10-15 minute daily exposures over a total
of 10-15 applications. Results showed clinical improvements with respect to
chest pain, vertigo, headache, and other symptoms.83 References 57. M.A.
Dudchenko, et al., "The Effect of Combined Treatment with the Use of
Magnetotherapy on the Systemic Hemodynamics of Patients with Ischemic
Heart Disease and Spinal Osteochondrosis," Lik Sprava, (5), May 1992, p. 40-
43. 58. E.M. Vasil'eva, et al., "The Effect of a Low-frequency Magnetic Field
on Erythrocyte Membrane Function and on the Prostanoid Level in the Blood
Plasma of Children with Parasystolic Arrhythmia," Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech
Fiz Kult, (2), March-April 1994, p. 18-20. 59. Y.B. Kirillov, et al.,
"Magnetotherapy in Obliterating Vascular Diseases of the Lower Extremities,"
Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult, (3), May-June 1992, p. 14-17.
60. O.M. Konova & M.A. Khan, "The Effect of a Low-frequency Alternating
Magnetic Field on the Autonomic Nervous System in Children with Primary
Arterial Hypertension," Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult, (2), March-April,
1996, p. 8-10.
61. V.S. Zadionchenko, et al., "Prognostic Criteria of the Efficacy of Magnetic
and Magnetic-laser Therapy in Patients with the Initial Stages of Hypertension,"
Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult, (1), January-February 1997, p. 8-11.
62. R.T. Gordon & D. Gordon, "Selective Resolution of Plaques and Treatment
of Atherosclerosis Biophysical Alteration of "Cellular" and "Intracellular"
Properties," Medical Hypotheses, 7(2), February 1981, p. 217-229.
63. S.G. Ivanov, et al., "The Magnetotherapy of Hypertension Patients," Ter
Arkh, 62(9), 1990, p. 71-74.
64. R. Cadossi, "Protective Effect of Electromagnetic Field Exposure on Acute
Soft Tissue Ischaemic Injury," Second World Congress for Electricity and
Magnetism in Biology and Medicine, 8-13 June 1997, Bologna, Italy.
65. I.E. Ganelina, et al., "Electromagnetic Radiation of Extremely High
Frequencies in Complex Therapy for Severe Stenocardia," Millimetrovie Volni
v Biologii I Meditcine, (4), 1994, p. 17-21.
67. V.V. Orzeshkovskii, et al., "Clinical Application of Electromagnetic
Fields," in I.G. Akoevs & V.V. Tiazhelov, (eds.), Topics of Experimental and
Applied Bioelectromagnetics. A Collection of Research Papers, Puschcino,
USSR, USSR Academy of Sciences, Biological Sciences Research Center,
1983, p. 139-147.
68. N.N. Naumcheva, "Effect of Millimeter Waves on Ischemic Heart Disease
Patients," Millimetrovie Volni v Biologii I Meditcine, (3), 1994, p. 62-67.
69. A.P. Dovganiuk & A.A. Minenkov, "The Use of Physical Factors in
Treating Chronic Arterial Insufficiency of the Lower Limbs," Vopr Kurortol
Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult, (5), 1996, p. 7-9.
70. V.V. Orzheshovski, et al., "Efficacy of Decimeter-Band Waves and
Magnetophore Therapy in Patients with Hypertension," Vrach Delo, (1), 1982,
p. 65-67.
71. L.L. Orlov, et al., "Indications for Using a New Magnetotherapeutic Method
in Arterial Hypertension," Soviet Medicine, (8), 1991, p. 23-24.
73. I.G. Alizade, et al., "Magnetic Treatment of Autologous Blood in the
Combined Therapy of Hypertensive Patients," Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz
Kult, (1), 1994, p. 32-33.
74. E.V. Rolovlev, "Treatment of Essential Hypertension Patients an
Alternating Magnetic Field Puncture," All-Union Symposium: Laser and
Magnetic Therapy in Experimental and Clinical Studies, June 16-18, 1993,
Obninsk, Kaluga Region, Russia, p. 221-223.
76. S.G. Ivanov, et al., "Use of Magnetic Fields in the Treatment of
Hypertensive Disease," Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult, (3), 1993
77. S.G. Ivanov, "The Comparative Efficacy of Nondrug and Drug Methods of
Treating Hypertension," Ter Arkh, 65(1), 1993, p. 44-49.
80. L.L. Orlov, et al., "Effect of a Running Pulse Magnetic Field on Some
Humoral Indices and Physical Capacity in Patients with Neurocirculatory
Hypo- and Hypertension," Biofizika, 41(4), 1996, p. 944-948.
81. T.A. Kniazeva, "The Efficacy of Low-Intensity Exposures in
Hypertension," Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult, 1, 1994, p. 8-9.
82. A.G. Kakulia, "The Use of Sonic Band Magnetic Fields in Various
Diseases," Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult, 3, 1982, p. 18-21.
83. S.S. Gabrielian, et al., "Use of Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields in the
Treatment of Patients with Atherosclerotic Encephalopathy," Vopr Kurortol
Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult, 3, 1987, p. 36-39.
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
http://iospress.metapress.com/app/home/contribution.asp?
wasp=h83ak04tvqcqxk34gt7r&referrer=parent&backto=searcharticlesresult
s,1,1;
Issue: Volume 15, Numbers 2-3/2000 - Pages: 77 - 81 - Michael I. Weintraub
A1, Steven P. Cole A2 Neuromagnetic treatment of pain in refractory carpal
tunnel syndrome: An electrophysiological and placebo analysis (Carpal Tunnel
and Elastomag products) A1 New York Medical College, Departments of
Neurology and Medicine, 325 S. Highland Avenue, Briarcliff, NY 10510, USA
- A2 Research Designs, Inc., Yorktown Heights, NY, USA Abstract:{\it
Objective:} To evaluate the neurobiological effect of constant, subthreshold
magnetic field exposure on symptomatic median nerve compression symptoms,
neurophysiology and assess the role of placebo. {\it Background:} Conservative
treatment of moderate and severe CTS has been variable and often results in
surgical decompression at the wrist. {\it Design/methods:} Eight moderately
symptomatic and intractable CTS hands constantly wore identical Elastomag
wrist support wraps (unmagnetized vs. Magnetized 350 gauss) for one month
intervals. Identical wraps were then switched at the second month. Baseline
assessments included the neurological exam, VAS scores for burning,
numbness and tingling twice a day on a 10 point ordinal scale. CMAP/SNAP
was determined at baseline and monthly intervals. Clinical follow-up at end of
fourth and eighth weeks was compared to baseline. {\it Results:} The mean
pain scores improved in four patients (57%) which also correlated with clinical
benefit. Improvement in Tinel and Phalen sign as well as sensory changes was
similarly noted. Placebo effect was detected in one patient (13%).
Electrophysiological improvement in distal latencies in 5/8 hands using
magnetic treatment was noted compared to no change or worsening in all
placebo cases. {\it Conclusions:} Percutaneous magnetic stimulation induced
palliative pain relief, presumably via modulation of the unmyelinated C-fibers.
Prior studies have suggested an influence on K+ inward rectification
excitability. These observations suggest that wearing magnetized wrist wraps
appears to be a novel therapeutic agent. However, the underlying
neuropathology tends to be progressive.
References:
1. K.A. Cseuz, J.E. Thomas, E.H. Lambert, J.G. Love and P.R. Lipscomb,
Long-term Results of Operations for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Mayo Clin Proc
41 (1966), 232-241.
2. G. Omer, Median Nerve Compression at the Wrist, Hand Clin 8 (1992), 317-
324.
3. K. Nakagawa, Study on Clinical Effects of the Magnetic Necklace, in: TBK
Magneto Medical Publication Series I, Beverly Hills (Cal), 1975, pp. 1-12.
4. C.Z. Hong, J.C. Lin, L.P. Bender, J.N. Schaeffer, R.J. Mettzer and P. Causin,
Magnetic Necklace: Its Therapeutic Effectiveness on Neck and Shoulder Pain,
Arch Phys Med Rehab 63 (1982), 462-466.
5. C. Vallbona, C.F. Hazelwood and G. Jurida, Response of Pain to Static
Magnetic Fields in Postpolio Patients: A Double- Blind Pilot Study, Arch Phys
Med Rehabil 78 (1997), 1200-1203.
6. D.N. Dawson, Entrapment Neuropathies of the Upper Extremities, N Eng J
Med 329 (1993), 2013-2018.
7. A.V. Cavopol, M.J. McLean and R.R. Holcomb, An Explanatory Mechanism
for Blockade of Action Potentials in Neural
Cells by External Magnetic Fields. Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the
Bioelectromagnetics Society. Abstract A-1-6, 1993.
8. D.O. Carpenter and S. Ayrapetyan, eds, Biological Effects of Electric and
Magnetic Fields, Academic Press, San Diego,
1994.
9. M.J. McLean, R.R. Holcomb, A.W. Wamil, J.D. Pickett and A.V. Cavopol,
Blockade of Sensory Neuron Action Potentials
by a Static Magnetic Field in the 10 mT Rage, Bioelectromag-netics 16 (1995),
20-32.
10. M.I. Weintraub, Chronic Submaximal Magnetic Stimulation in Peripheral
Neuropathy: Is there a Beneficial Therapeutic
Relationship? Amer J Pain Management 8 (1998), 12-16.
11. M.I. Weintraub, Magnetic Bio-Stimulation in Painful Diabetic Peripheral
Neuropathy: A Novel Intervention. A Randomized,
Double-Placebo Crossover Study, Amer J Pain Management 9 (1999), 8-17.
12. E.A. Collacott, J.T. Zimmerman, D.W. White and J.P. Rindone, Bipolar
Permanent Magnets for the Treatment of Chronic
Low Back Pain, JAMA 283 (2000), 1322-1325.
13. M. McLean, S. Engstrom and R. Holcomb, Static Magnetic Fields for the
Treatment of Pain, Epilepsy and Behavior 2 (2001),
S74-S80.
Dental Research Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This placebo-controlled study examined the effects of micromagnets in the
treatment of periodontal disease. Micromagnets
were attached to the skin over areas of inflammation for a period ranging from
1 to 8 days, with the number of magnets used at
once varying from 1 to 6. The course of treatment lasted as long as 4 weeks.
Results indicated that patients receiving the
micromagnet therapy experienced earlier and more trouble-free recoveries
following oral surgery, as well as less pain relative
to controls.99
This controlled study examined the effects of adjunctive Diapulse
electromagnetic therapy on oral surgery recovery. Patients
received the therapy once per day beginning between 3 to 5 days prior to oral
surgery. Therapy was maintained until the point
of hospital release. Results found the therapy produced significant healing
relative to controls, who received conventional treatment only.100
This study found that patients suffering from various oral diseases experienced
more rapid healing when treated with both conventional therapies and 30
minutes per day of pulsed electromagnetic fields (5 mT, 30 Hz), as opposed to
conventional therapies alone.101
References
99. V.E. Kriokshina, et al., "Use of Micromagnets in Stomatology,"
Magnitologiia, (1), 1991, p. 17-20.
100. L.C. Rhodes, "The Adjunctive Utilization of Diapulse Therapy (Pulsed
High Peak Power Electromagnetic Energy) in Accelerating Tissue Healing in
Oral Surgery," Q National Dental Association, 40(1), 1981, p. 4-11.
101. V. Hillier-Kolarov & N. Pekaric-Nadj, "PEMF Therapy as an Additional
Therapy for Oral Diseases," European Bioelectromagnetics Association, 1st
Congress, 23-25 January 1992, Brussels, Belgium.
Depression Research Studies
Double-Blind, Magnet Therapy Eases Severe Depression
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/04/990415064738.htm
The effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a
refinement of TMS, was tested on 67 patients in a doubleblind study -- in which
neither the patients nor the researchers are told who is receiving the treatment
and who is receiving the sham.
At the end of two weeks, half the patients in the rTMS group showed a 50
percent improvement in their depression ratings. Only onequarter of those in the
sham-treated group showed the same improvement. Moreover, half the patients
receiving the treatment had no need for further treatment with ECT, while all
those receiving the sham treatment required it. "Our findings are very exciting,
since term," explained Dr. Ehud Klein of the Faculty of Medicine at the
Technion and head of the Department of Psychiatry at Rambam Medical Center
in Haifa. "The treatment holds the promise of eliminating the need for ECT
therapy in many cases." "It's a landmark work," said Dr. Mark George,
Professor of Psychiatry at Medical University of South Carolina, about the
Technion research. His view was seconded by Dr. Robert Berman, Assistant
Professor of Psychiatry at Yale School of Medicine, who noted that "Dr. Klein's
group, which has been at the forefront of developing TMS, now corroborates
earlier reports on the effectiveness of TMS with the first largescale
investigation."
Other Depression Research Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
CIENTIFIC STUDIES
Following are descriptions of 6 recent studies, many of which are double blind
studies, published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, on the impact of
treatment with magnetic fields on a variety of conditions: This review article
examined the literature concerning the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation
in the treatment of depression. Results showed the high-frequency, repetitive
transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment to be an effective, side-effect free
therapy for depression that may hold promise for treating related psychiatric
disorders as well.103 Noting that there is good reason to believe the pineal
gland is a magnetosensitive system and that application of magnetic fields in
experimental animals has a similar effect to that of acute exposure to light with
respect to melatonin secretion, the authors propose that magnetic treatment
could be a beneficial new therapy for winter depression in humans.104 This
review article notes that transcranial magnetic stimulation has been shown to
elicit antidepressant effects, electrically stimulating deep regions of the
brain.105 In this theoretical paper, the author argues that deep, low-rate
transcranial magnetic stimulation can produce therapeutic effects equivalent to
those of electroconvulsive therapy but without the dangerous side effects
106 This study examined the effects of millimeter wave (MW) therapy as a
supplemental treatment in patients suffering from various types of depression.
MW therapy involved the use of a "Yav'-1" apparatus (5.6 mm wavelength, 53
GHz), and consisted of up to 60 minutes of exposure per day, 2 to 3 times per
week, for a total of as many as 15 exposures. Results showed that combined
MW/conventional treatment produced a complete recovery in over 50 percent
of cases studied a significant improvement in 41 percent, and some
improvement in 8 percent. Recovery rates among controls (conventional
treatment only) were 4, 48, and 41 percent, respectively.108 Results of this
study led researchers to conclude that patients suffering from major depression
experienced a significant reduction of depressive symptoms following treatment
with transcranial magnetic stimulation coupled with standard medication
relative to patients taking the medicine. This was true after just three TMS
treatments.109
103. M.T. Kirkcaldie, et al., Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as Therapy for
Depression and Other Disorders," Aust N Z J Psychiatry, 31(2), April 1997, p.
264-272.
104. R. Sandyk, et al., "Magnetic Fields and Seasonality of Affective Illness:
Implications for Therapy," International Journal of Neurosci, 58(3-4), June
1991, p. 261-267.
105. C. Haag, et al., "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. A Diagnostic Means
from Neurology as Therapy in Psychiatry?" Nervenarzt, 68(3), March 1997, p.
274-278.
106. T. Zyss, "Will Electroconvulsive Therapy Induce Seizures: Magnetic Brain
Stimulation as Hypothesis of a New Psychiatric Therapy," Psychiatry Pol,
26(6), November-December 1992, p. 531-541.
107. G.V. Morozov, et al., "Extremely-High Frequency Electromagnetic
Radiation in the Treatment of Neurotic Depression in Women," Millimeter
Waves in Medicine & Biology. Digest of Papers of the 10th Russian
Symposium with International Participation, April 24-26, 1995, Moscow,
Russia, p. 49-51.
108. G.V. Morozov, et al., "Treatment of Neurotic Depression with a Help of
Extremely High Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation," Zh Nevropatol
Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova, 96(6), 1996, p. 28-31.
109. A. Conca, et al., "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Novel Anti-
depressive Strategy?" Neuropsychobiology, 34(4), 1996, p. 204-207.
Diabetes Research Studies
PEER-REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
In this study, 320 diabetics received impulsed magnetic field treatment while
100 diabetics (controls) received conservative therapy alone. Results showed
beneficial effects with respect to vascular complications in 74 percent of the
patients receiving magnetotherapy combined with conservative methods,
compared to a 28-percent effectiveness rate among controls.111 This study
involving 72 diabetics with purulent wounds found that magnetic fields aided
healing significantly.113
References
111. I.B. Kirillovm, et al., "Magentotherapy in the Comprehensive Treatment of
Vascular Complications of Diabetes Mellitus," Klin Med, 74(5), 1996, p. 39-41.
113. R.A. Kuliev & R.F. Babaev, "A Magnetic Field in the Combined
Treatment of Suppurative Wounds in Diabetes Mellitus," Vestn Khir Im I I
Grek, 148(1), January 1992, p. 33-36.
Ear Research Study (Otitis Externa)
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This study examined the effects synchronizing pulse waves in the impaired area
when treating patients suffering from acute diffuse otitis externa with low-level
magnetic fields in combination with conventional therapies. Patients were
divided into three groups. The first received ultrahigh-frequency or very-high-
frequency electromagnetic waves. The second received 15-minute daily
exposures to 50-Hz alternating or pulsating 20-mT magnetic fields. The third
group of patients were treated switching on the same magnetic fields only
during propagation of the pulse wave through the ear vessels. Results showed a
100 percent recovery rate in patients across all three groups, with recovery
taking the least amount of time among those in group 3.239
References
239. V.V. Sunstov, "Treatment of Acute Diffuse Otitis Externa Low-Frequency
Magnetic Fields," Vestn Otorinolaringol, 6, 1991, p. 35-38.
Effects of Nikken Magnetic Insoles on Diabetic Neuropathy
Third Phase of the Weintraub STUDY Summary:
http://health.discovery.com/centers/althealth/diabetic.html
Radio interview with Dr. Michael Weintraub is on audio tape. Through Team
Tools: 1-800-667-0198
• The Longitudinal Study was carried out with 264 patients with Diabetic
Neuropathy took part in a 4 month study in 48 centers in 27 states according to
strict randomized double-blind / placebo design
• The lead researcher was internationally known Michael Weintraub, M.D.,
FACP
• The results of this study [which have been tabulated and reviewed by NIH],
will be reported as the Keynote Address for the annual meeting of the American
College of Neurology as well as will appear shortly in the upcoming issues of
JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association).
RESULTS:
- 90% OF THE PATIENTS REPORTED A POSITIVE OUTCOME, I.E.
REDUCTION IN DIABETIC NEUROPATHY SYMPTOMS (numbness,
tingling, burning)
- REPORTED INCREASE IN MICROCIRCULATION (foot warmth)
- REPORTED INCREASE IN BALANCE and COORDINATION
CONCLUSIONS:
All Magnetic Insoles are NOT created equal
Nikken's design was THE ONLY insole that provided consistent results
Use of these insoles will slow the progression of Diabetic Neuropathy and
conditions related to compromised Microcirculation (Diabetic Ulcers,
Gangrene)
Reduction in foot amputations (approximately 54,000 annually)
Endometriosis Research Study
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This study found that a combined treatment consisting of magnetic-infrared-
laser therapy (10-15 min/day ever other day over a period of 10-14 exposures,
then repeated in 2-3 months) and conventional drug therapy proved highly
effective in women suffering from endometriosis.119
References 119. M. Damirov, et al., "Magnetic-Infared-Laser Therapeutic
Apparatus (MILTA) in Treatment of Patients with Endometriosis,"
Vrach, 12, 1994, p. 17-19.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
Dr. William Pawluk, M.D., MSC. President of Advanced Magnetic Research
Institute. Assistant Professor at John Hopkins University. Co-author of
Magnetic Therapy in Eastern Europe said 45% of women have endometriosis
which is one of the leading causes of infertility. Magnets around the pelvic area
makes a difference in 25- 35% fertility rate for women who have not conceived
for years.
Epilepsy Research Studies
http://www.pslgroup.com/dg/16596e.htm
BOCA RATON, FL -- February 17, 2000 -- Jacobson Resonance Enterprises,
Inc. reported the results of a double blind, pilot clinical study in epilepsy
conducted at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center by principal
investigator Kalarickal Oommen, M.D., director of epilepsy research and
nationally recognized authority in the treatment and research of epilepsy
seizures. The data indicated that treatment with the Jacobson Resonator,
utilizing low-intensity and low-frequency magnetic fields, decreased seizure
frequency in some patients with intractable partial complex epilepsy
significantly and that this modality may be a useful adjunctive treatment in
these patients and others. Intractable partial complex epilepsy patients were
enrolled in a pilot medical study in a non-randomized and double blind fashion.
In the first phase of seven weeks, each patient received either magnetic
treatment or no treatment for 40 minutes per treatment per week.
In the second phase of seven weeks, the order was reversed for patients
receiving no treatment or magnetic field treatment. It was found that 66 percent
of the patients had a mean decrease in seizure frequency of 33 percent plus
during the study.
Dr. Kalarickal Oommen stated, "The results are very encouraging when you
compare it to the way anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) are approved by the FDA.
The percentages for some of the recently marketed AEDs and the Vagus Nerve
Stimulator were in the 17-25 percent range or under. I believe this is great
news, particularly when you consider that patients were only treated once a
week and non-invasively."
Dr. Jerry Jacobson, Chairman and CEO, stated, "The follow-up study will be
double blinded and contain a greater population of patients who will be treated
three times per week instead of only once a week. We are hopeful that the
seizure reduction level will thus rise to 50 percent. We are moving quickly with
I.R.B. approval for our next phase of the clinical trial and hope to request to the
FDA 'expedited review' for approval next year.
Epilepsy Research Study http://infoventures.com/emf/currlit/bu11781.html
The effects of DC magnetic fields on brains of epilepsy patients were
investigated. Application of 1- to 2-mT magnetic fields induced significantly
higher levels of epileptiform activity in 6 of 8 patients with drug resistant meso-
temporal lobe epilepsy. Removal of the fields appeared to cause epileptiform
discharges in some instances, suggesting that the change in field may be more
important than application of a magnetic field. The reason for enhanced
sensitivity of epilepsy patients to magnetic fields is not known. The authors
speculate that it could be related to the existence of biomineralized
ferrimagnetic magnetite, which has been found in brain tissues of epileptic and
nonepileptic subjects, or it could reflect a direct effect of the field on some
aspect of central nervous system activity.
Epilepsy Research Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This article reports on the cases of three patients with partial seizures who
received treatment with external artificial magnetic fields of low intensity. Such
treatment led to a significant attenuation of seizure frequency over a 10-14-
month period.121 Experimental results indicated that the administration of
modulated electromagnetic fields of 2-30 Hz suppressed epilepsy in rats.122
This review article cites one study in particular in which results showed that
pretreatment with 30 minutes of exposure to a 75-mT pole strength, DC-
powered magnetic field significantly prevented experimentally induced seizures
in mice.123 This double-blind, placebo-controlled study examined the effects of
2-hour exposure to weak magnetic fields (0.2-0.7 G, irregularly oscillating
0.026-0.067 Hz) produced 3 pairs of orthogonal Helmholtz coils on pain
perception in healthy subjects. Results showed that magnetic treatment
significantly reduced the perception of pain.124 This article reports on the case
of a severe epileptic who experienced a significant lessening of behavior
disturbances and seizure frequency following treatment with low-frequency,
external artificial magnetic fields.125 Low-frequency, external artificial
magnetic field treatment was shown to significantly reduce seizures in four
adult epileptic cases.126
References
121. P.A. Anninos, et al., "Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Partial
Seizures," International Journal of Neurosci, 60(3-4), October 1991, p. 141-171.
122. G.D. Antimonii & R.A. Salamov, "Action of a Modulated Electromagnetic
Field on Experimentally Induced Epileptiform Brain Activity in Rats," Biull
Eksp Biol Med, 89(2), February 1980, p. 145-148.
123. 123. M.J. McLean, et al., "Therapeutic Efficacy of a Static Magnetic
Device in Three Animal Seizure Models: Summary of Experience," Second
World Congress for Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine, 8-13
June 1997, Bologna, Italy.
124. 124. F. Sartucci, et al., "Human Exposure to Oscillating Magnetic Fields
Produces Changes in Pain Perception and Pain- Related Somatosensory Evoked
Potentials," Second World Congress for Electricity and Magnetism in Biology
and Medicine, 8- 13 June 1997, Bologna, Italy.
125. 125. R. Sandyk & P.A. Anninos, "Attenuation of Epilepsy with
Application of External Magnetic Fields: A Case Report," International Journal
of Neurosci, 66(1-2), September 1992, p. 75-85.
126. 126. R. Sandyk & P.A. Anninos, "Magnetic Fields Alter the Circadian
Periodicity of Seizures," International Journal of Neurosci, 63(3-4), April 1992,
p. 265-274.
Eyelid Infection Research Study
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
Results of this study indicated that the use of an alternating magnetic field in
conjunction with a magnetic ointment containing reduced iron powder had
beneficial effects in patients with chronic blepharitis.12
References
12. V.A. Machekhin, et al., "A New Method for Treating Chronic Blepharitis
Using Magnetic Compounds and an Alternating Magnetic Field," Vestn
Oftalmol, 109(4), July-September 1993, p. 16-18.
Glaucoma Research Study
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
In this study, patients with primary open-angle glaucoma with compensated
intraocular pressure were administered magnetotherapy using an ATOS device
with 33-mT magnetic field induction. The procedure was administered to a
patient in a sitting posture with a magnetic inductor held before the eye.
Sessions lasted 10 minutes and each course included 10 sessions. Following 4-5
months of therapy, results showed improved vision acuity 0.16 diopters, on an
average of 29 out of 30 eyes with vision acuity below 1.0. 149
References
149. Bisvas, et al., "Possibilities of Magnetotherapy in Stabilization of Visual
Function in Patients with Glaucoma," Vestn Oftalmol, 112(1), Jauary-March
1996, p. 6-8.
Magnet Therapy & Fibromyalgia Pain:
New Research from the University Of Virginia
Magnet Therapy Shows Some Potential For Pain Relief - March, 2001
Results are inconclusive, but a study of magnet therapy found the controversial
treatment reduced fibromyalgia pain intensity enough in one group of study
participants to be "clinically meaningful," the researchers said.
University of Virginia (UVa) researchers published the results of one of the first
clinical research studies conducted on magnet therapy for pain in the February
23, 2001, issue of the Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine.
Three measures of pain were used: functional status reported by study
participants on a standardized fibromyalgia questionnaire used across the U.S.,
number of tender points on the body, and pain intensity ratings. Data were
compiled for 94 fibromyalgia patients randomly divided into four groups. One
control group received sham pads containing magnets that had been
demagnetized through heat processing. The second control group received only
their usual treatment for fibromyalgia. Two other groups received active
magnetic pads: one group used Pad A, which provided whole-body exposure to
a low, uniformly static magnetic field of negative polarity. The other used Pad
B, which exposed subjects to a low static magnetic field that varied spatially
and in polarity. The subjects were treated and tracked for six months.
"When we compared the groups, we did not find significant statistical
differences in most of the outcome measures," said Ann Gill Taylor, RN, EdD,
co-investigator for the study, professor of nursing, and director and principal
investigator of the Center for Study of Complementary and Alternative
Therapies at the University of Virginia. "However, we did find a statistically
significant difference in pain intensity reduction for one of the active magnet
pad groups. The two groups that slept on pads with active magnets generally
showed the greatest improvements in outcome scores of pain intensity level,
number of tender points on the body and functional status after six months."
Pad A group exhibited a consistent improvement across all four outcome
measures at three and six months. Pad B group showed an improvement in all
outcomes at three months, and these improved scores were maintained at six
months. The sham pad group and the group receiving only usual care did not
exhibit the same improvements. The magnetic fields of the mattresses were
tested thoroughly to quantify how much exposure, or dosage, study participants
were receiving, the researchers said.
"Finding any positive results in the groups using the magnets was surprising,
given how little we know about how magnets work to reduce pain," said the
study's principal investigator Dr. Alan P. Alfano, assistant professor of physical
medicine and rehabilitation and medical director of the UVa HealthSouth
Rehabilitation Hospital. "The results tell us maybe this therapy works, and that
maybe more research is justified. You can't draw final conclusions from only
one study."
"To our knowledge, no other studies on magnet therapy have been done in as
rigorous a clinical setting as UVa, and this study was the largest conducted so
far," Taylor said. "Nevertheless, larger studies are needed to find clear answers
about magnets' safety and efficacy in treating pain."
"Fibromyalgia is a common rheumatological condition for which there is no
generally effective treatment," Alfano explained. "People who have
fibromyalgia try everything and magnetic mattress pads are one of the most
popular complementary products they try. We did this study because we hoped
to provide some useful information for them.
"In the past decade, people in this country have been using magnets for
everything from tennis elbow to carpal tunnel syndrome. They want to do
something for their pain that doesn't involve medication or injections, and
magnets seem relatively benign. But people don't know how to evaluate
magnetic products when considering what to buy," Alfano continued. "There
are no standards for magnets yet. So researchers need to find out what dosage,
field strength, and period of exposure is proper, what side effects may occur and
what conditions benefit most."
Two other basic science laboratory studies currently underway at Uva are
investigating the effects of pulsed and static magnetic fields on neural processes
and functions and the effects of magnetic fields on microvascular capillary
blood flow.
The study was conducted with partial support from a grant from the U.S.
National Institutes of Health Center for Complementary and Alternative
Medicine.
To see more of the NewsRx.com, or to subscribe, go to http://www.newsrx.com
Magnetic Mattress Pad Use in Patients with Fibromyalgia:
A Randomized Double-blind Pilot Study.
Agatha P. Colbert, M.D. Clinical Assistant Professor of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111
Marko S Markov, Ph.D.
Department of Orthopedics
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York
Mandira Banerji, M.A.
Research Assistant, Litterst & Associates, Newton, MA
Arthur A Pilla, Ph.D.
Department of Orthopedics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York
Acknowledgements:
Partial support for the project was provided by Magnetherapy, Inc. and by the
Horace W. Goldsmith Foundation.
The authors wish to honor the late Bill Roper whose encouragement and
support made this project possible
Please request reprints from the corresponding author:
Agatha P.Colbert, M.D.
25 Grant Street, Suite 4,
Waltham, MA 02453.
E-mail: apcolbert@mediaone.net
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 13(1999) 19-31
ISSN 1053-8127/$8.00 Copyright 1999, IOS Press. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Magnetic Mattress Pad Use in Patients with Fibromyalgia: a Randomized
Double-blind Pilot Study.
Objective: To determine if the chronic pain and sleep disturbances experienced
by patients with fibromyalgia can be improved by sleeping on a magnetic
mattress pad.
Design: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Patients’ homes and the private practice office of the principal
investigator.
Patients: Thirty-five female subjects diagnosed with fibromyalgia syndrome
were recruited. Thirty met inclusion/exclusion criteria and entered the study.
Twenty-five completed it. One was lost to follow-up. Three were withdrawn for
protocol violations and one because of an intercurrent hospitalization.
Intervention: Sleeping on an experimental (magnetized at a magnet surface
field strength of 1100 ± 50 Gauss and delivering 200-600 Gauss to the skin
surface or a sham (non-magnetized) mattress pad over a 16 week
period.
Main Outcome Measures: Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for global wellbeing,
pain, sleep, fatigue and tiredness on awakening; Total Myalgic Score; Pain
Distribution Drawings; and a modified Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire.
Results: Subjects sleeping on the experimental mattress pad experienced a
significant decrease in pain (p <.05), fatigue (p<.006), total myalgic score (p
<.03), and pain distribution drawing (p < .02). Additionally, these subjects
showed significant improvement in reported sleep (p <.01) and physical
functioning as evidenced from the modified Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
(p < .04). Subjects sleeping on the sham mattress pad experienced no significant
change in these same outcome measures. Subjects in both the control and
experimental groups showed improvement in tiredness on wakening,
demonstrating a placebo effect in this parameter. Neither group showed any
effect on global wellbeing.
Conclusions: Sleeping on a magnetic mattress pad, with a magnet surface field
strength of 1100+-50 Gauss, delivering 200-600 Gauss at the skin surface
provides statistically significant and clinically relevant pain relief and sleep
improvement in subjects with fibromyalgia. No adverse reactions were noted
during the16-week trial period.
Introduction
Fibromyalgia (FM), characterized by chronic, widespread, musculoskeletal pain
and stiffness, disturbed sleep and fatigue, is a common, well-recognized clinical
syndrome. Prevalence rates for women are estimated at 3.4%, and for the
general population, 2% 1 with an even higher rate among military personnel,
ranking second in the list of most frequently self-reported symptoms among
Gulf War veterans (19.2 %) 2. The etiology and pathophysiology of this
disorder remains uncertain. Current management strategies, both
pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical, provide limited symptomatic relief.
Medications such as the tricyclic antidepressants, benzodiazepines, anti-
inflammatory agents, and other CNS active medications have produced
meaningful improvement 30% to 50 % of patients3, with unwanted side effects
experienced by up to 98%4. Non-medicinal treatments including: aerobic
exercise and stress management5, electroacupuncture6, hypnotherapy7,
electromyography-biofeedback8, and cognitive behavioral therapy9 provide
significant benefit, and have minimal adverse effects, compared with
medications, but require active compliance on the part of the patients for lasting
relief.
Low frequency pulsing electromagnetic fields (EMF), first approved by the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1979, are commonly used to treat
recalcitrant bone fractures and soft tissue injuries10,11. Therapeutic permanent
magnets are gaining worldwide popularity for self-administered pain control.
The standard physical unit of measure for magnetic field strength is Tesla (T).
One Tesla is equal to 10,000 Gauss (G). For comparison, the earth’s magnetic
field is approximately 0.5 G, while a standard MRI instrument utilizes magnetic
fields in the range of 1.5 -2.5 T (15,000 - 25,000 G). Gauss will be used to
characterize the magnetic field level employed in this study. Therapeutic
devices utilizing permanent magnets are not yet regulated in the United States.
A Medline search of the relevant literature in English revealed only three
reports of controlled trials in which the therapeutic efficacy of permanent
magnets was assessed. A 1982 study of a magnetic necklace for neck and
shoulder pain found no difference in therapeutic benefit between groups
wearing the sham or the magnetized necklaces12. A more recent double-blind
pilot study documented approximately 70% pain reduction in patients with
post-polio syndrome, after permanent magnet (surface field strength of 300-500
G) application to painful trigger points for a 45-minute period13. Neuropathic
pain from diabetic neuropathy is also reportedly diminished as a result of
wearing magnetic insoles14.
A double-blind study at San-Ikukai Hospital in Japan15 demonstrated effective
pain control in over 70% of 375 individuals who used static magnetic mattress
pads for a variety of musculoskeletal pain complaints. The permanent magnets
embedded in the mattress pads had a surface field strength of 750-950 G. In
Japan, these devices are regulated for therapeutic efficacy at a minimum surface
field strength of 500 G. No adverse effects related to the use of static magnets
were reported in any of these studies.
In general, permanent magnets used for therapeutic purposes are of two
structural types: flexible (made of plastilloy) or hard (ceramic or metal based).
Manufacturers characterize their magnetic products by the term "gauss rating",
which describes the magnetization energy at the core of the magnet. This
designation however, does not specify the therapeutic importance or dosimetry
of a magnet as it gives no information about the magnetic field at the magnet’s
surface or the amount of magnetic energy delivered to the target tissue. The
magnetic field strength (flux density) of a permanent magnet is measured with a
magnetometer or Gauss meter, usually with a Hall effect probe. The flux
density decreases exponentially with distance from the magnet’s surface. The
actual dosage of magnetic energy delivered to the target tissue(s) depends upon
the relative size of the magnet and target and the distance the area to be treated
is from the magnet. Since the magnetic field penetrates all tissues in exactly the
same manner as in air dosimetry can be estimated, based on magnetic field
measurements in air. The magnetic field strength of mattress pads containing
magnets is a function of the magnetization energy, the size, the volume and the
shape of a particular magnet, as well as the configuration in which the magnets
are placed in a given mattress pad. In addition, when an individual is lying on a
foam mattress pad in which ceramic magnets are embedded, other factors, such
as the individual’s weight, the compressibility of the mattress foam, or whether
the patient is in a side-lying, prone or supine position influence the magnetic
dosage delivered to specific areas of the body. All layers of human tissue are
equally penetrated by a magnetic field. The only factors that affect the actual
magnetic field "seen" by the tissue are its distance from the surface of the
magnet and its orientation with respect to that surface.
Although, to date, the clinical literature on therapy using permanent magnets is
sparse, there is compelling evidence that both electromagnetic and static
magnetic fields have physiologically relevant biological effects on the human
organism16-25.
In light of this background information on therapeutic magnets, and the fact that
pharmaceutical management strategies for treating patients with fibromyalgia
have limited success and a high incidence of associated adverse effects, this
study was designed to investigate the potential benefits of a magnetic mattress
pad for reducing pain and improving sleep in this patient population.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Subjects
Thirty-five female subjects with fibromyalgia were recruited from three
sources: the principal investigator’s clinical practice, a referring physical
therapy group and a local fibromyalgia support group. Thirty subjects met
the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were accepted for participation in the study.
Five subjects did not complete the study: one withdrew on her own, one was
withdrawn because of an intercurrent psychiatric hospitalization, three others
were withdrawn because of protocol violations. (See the Results section for
more detail). The average age of the 25 subjects who completed the study was
49.7 years, ranging from 25 to 78 years. The average weight was 166 lbs.,
ranging from 115 to 216 lbs. Chronic diffuse pain symptoms were present for a
minimum of two years in all subjects. Ten subjects were married; 5 were single;
7 divorced; and 3 were unmarried, but living with a partner. Sixteen were
employed outside the home. Four were receiving medical disability benefits.
See Table 1.
Inclusion/exclusion criteria
Subjects were enrolled in the study if they met the American College of
Rheumatology’s diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia syndrome26. Patients had
to have a history of pain for greater than three months, present on both the right
and left sides of the body, and above and below the waist. Subjects had to agree
to start no new pain medications, or additional pain management modalities
during the 16-week trial period. Study participants were allowed to continue
taking current medications or maintain therapies such as physical therapy,
acupuncture, chiropractic or myofascial release, if they had been taking the
medications or engaged in the specific therapeutic modality for a minimum of
four previous weeks. The medications and therapeutic modalities being used by
both patient groups are given in Tables 2 and 3 respectively. There was no
significant difference in the number of subjects in both groups who maintained
other therapies (p = .40) or continued to use prescribed medications (p=.087)
during this study. It was anticipated that, if the magnetic mattress pad was to be
effective, a significant improvement above and beyond that derived from a
maintenance pain control program would be evident. Two of the recruited
candidates excluded themselves from the study because they had previously
experienced a temporary worsening of symptoms while wearing 800 G
neodymium magnets on acupuncture points. The other three recruits were
excluded because they anticipated prolonged travel or the possibility of starting
a new pain medication within the time period of the therapeutic trial. The study
was approved by the Tufts University School of Medicine Investigational
Review Board through the Department of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation. All subjects gave written informed consent.
Research design
This was a randomized double-blind pilot study, performed at the patient’s
home and at the principal investigator’s private practice office. Subjects were
randomly assigned to either the experimental or control group. The mattress
pads were shipped directly to the subject’s home. The code was kept by the
manufacturer until all data was entered into the computer system, at which time
it was sent to the biostatistician who had no contact with the subjects. Neither
the principal investigator nor her research assistant saw any of the mattress
pads, and both remained blinded observers throughout the clinical assessments
and data analysis phases. There was no contact between the code-keeper
(manufacturer), the patient, anyone who had contact with the patient or the
biostatistician, during the course of this study.
At baseline all subjects underwent an initial clinical examination by the
principal investigator to confirm the diagnosis of fibromyalgia according to the
criteria of the American College of Rheumatology26. Subjects were also seen
for two follow-up visits: after two weeks of mattress use and again for a final
evaluation at the end of the trial period. All evaluations were performed by the
principal investigator to avoid problems with interrater reliability. Each subject
mailed in completed weekly visual analog scales for global wellbeing, pain,
sleep disturbance, fatigue and tiredness on wakening. Subjects were seen for a
final visit after 16 weeks of sleeping on the mattress pad. The research assistant
and principal investigator were available by telephone at all times during the
study period and the majority of subjects were in weekly communication.
Subjects were advised not to discuss issues related to the study if they happened
to meet another participant in the study.
Therapeutic Intervention
Subjects were asked to sleep nightly on either a magnetized mattress pad
(experimental) or on a non-magnetized pad (sham) for a 16 week period.
Subjects were told to use the mattress pad at night only and not to rest on it
during the day. There were no visible or textural differences between the
experimental and the sham mattress pads. Both the experimental and sham
mattress pads were provided by Magnetherapy, Inc*. Each pad (experimental
and sham) contained 270 domino shaped ceramic pieces, measuring 2.0 x 4.5 x
1 cm. The ceramic pieces were placed 4 cm apart and arranged in a pattern of
15 rows across and 18 rows down. All ceramic pieces were encased in the
bottom layer of two layers of hospital grade foam, which were glued together.
The entire pad was covered by a quilted cotton case. The total thickness of the
mattress pad was 4 cm. The ceramic pieces in the mattress pads of the
experimental group were magnetized with a surface field strength of 1100 ± 50
G. With this surface field strength and the positioning of magnets in the pad, it
is estimated that between 200- 600 G is delivered to the skin surface at various
anatomical sites. This magnetic field level is well within that reported to
achieve clinically meaningful therapeutic effects13-15. Magnets were placed
such that the field direction facing the body repelled a north seeking compass
needle. The sham ceramic pieces were identical in every way to those in the
experimental magnets, but were not magnetized. All mattress pads were
shipped directly by the manufacturer to each subject’s home. Subjects were
asked not to try to determine whether they had the experimental or sham pad.
They were instructed to place the pad on their bed according to our directions,
as soon as it was delivered. When placed in its proper position, the thickest
foam layer of the pad faced upwards, making it difficult to detect magnetization
with lightweight items such as paperclips.
Outcome measures.
The primary outcome measures were related to pain and sleep. Eight variables
were studied: five Visual Analog Scales (VAS) i.e., global well-being, pain,
sleep disturbance, fatigue and tiredness on wakening; Total Myalgic Score; a
Body Pain Distribution Drawing; and a physical functioning score derived from
the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) 27.
Visual Analog Scales (VAS)
Subjects were requested to complete five VAS for global well-being, pain,
sleep, fatigue and tiredness on wakening, on a weekly basis, during the 16-week
study period. Visual Analog Scales are frequently used to assess these
parameters in clinical trials of patients who have fibromyalgia 4,7,9,28,29. Each
VAS consisted of a 10 cm. horizontal line anchored at both ends with "0" = no
symptoms and "10" = worst possible symptoms. Subjects were asked to place a
mark at the point on the scale, which represented their symptom level that day.
In an attempt to adjust for the wide fluctuation in day to day symptoms
experienced by patients with fibromyalgia, subjects were instructed to complete
the VAS on Wednsedays at approximately 10 a.m.. They were specifically
requested not to complete the VAS on the weekend. The completed VAS was
mailed weekly, in a self-addressed stamped envelope, to the principal
investigator’s office.
Total Myalgic Score.
The American College of Rheumatology requires that pain be reported by the
patient in at least 11 of 18 tender points, when the examiner uses 4 kg. of digital
pressure (the point at which the thumbnail begins to blanch)26 for a confirmed
diagnosis of fibromyalgia. A baseline tender point evaluation, by palpation, was
performed on the 18 predesignated anatomic regions by the principal
investigator. This examination was done in accordance with the general
procedures recommended for the standardized Manual Tender Point Survey 30
and scored on a three point scale. The intensity of tender point pain was scored
as "2" for intense pain, "1" for moderate pain and "0" for no pain at these
points. The total possible myalgic score was 36 if all the tested tender points
were described as "intensely painful". Total myalgic scores were obtained by
the principal investigator at the beginning and end of the trial period.
Body Pain Drawing.
On a body drawing with anterior, posterior and lateral views, subjects were
instructed to color, with either red (severe pain) or green (moderate pain), all
painful areas. No coloring meant no pain. These drawings were quantified by
superimposing a template of 316 contiguous circles, and counting the number
of colored circles for a total score. The template was developed by the research
assistant and principal investigator. Red circles were scored as "2" and green
circles as "1". The baseline drawing score was compared to the endpoint
drawing score. The worst possible score, i.e., if every circle has red coloration,
is 632. To establish interrater reliability, subsets of data were scored
independently by the principal investigator and research assistant. Interrater
reliability was computed at r =.72.
Physical Functioning.
The FIQ27 was developed and validated to assess current health status of
women with FM. Item 1, a 10 part question, was used in this study to assess
physical functioning in tasks of daily living. The best possible score for this
item is 0, meaning that subjects are always able to do the 10 specified tasks of
daily living. The worst possible score is 30, meaning they are never able to
perform any of the tasks. Subjects were asked to complete the modified FIQ at
the beginning and end of the trial period.
Daily Diary
In addition to completing their weekly VAS, subjects were requested to keep a
daily diary in which to document any unusual or adverse reactions. Exact
number of hours of sleep or hours spent on the mattress pad was not
documented.
Statistical analysis
All primary outcome measures were compared at the start of the study and at
end of the 16th week for all subjects in the treated and sham groups. All
outcome data were analyzed using a paired Student’s t test. The analysis of
variance F test confirmed there was no significant difference in the variances
for all comparisons. The Kolgomorov-Smirnov test confirmed all data sets were
normally distributed. Significance was accepted for P= 0.05.
RESULTS
Thirty female subjects met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were enrolled in
the study, which began in March 1997 and was completed in December 1997.
Five subjects did not complete the study. One from the sham group was lost to
follow-up; a second also from the control group had an interim psychiatric
hospitalization. Three others were withdrawn because of protocol violations.
One subject from the experimental group added a new medication for pain
control; another from the experimental group was discovered to have.0 been
taking morphine from the onset; one subject from the control group was found
to be enrolled in an active pain management program. The final number of test
subjects who completed the protocol and slept on the mattress pad for 16 weeks
was 25; 13 in the experimental and 12 in the control group. Table 1 shows the
demographics of the study participants. There was no significant difference in
age, sex, employment, marital status, or months since onset of symptoms,
between the experimental and control groups. The only significant variable was
weight; the sham subjects were heavier than the real treatment subjects
(p=.005). As will be seen, this had no effect on the outcome since the magnetic
field level would have been within the 200-600 G range for the sham group had
they been treated with active magnets.
The means of all outcome data for the control and experimental groups were
compared at the start (baseline) and end of treatment at week 16 (endpoint)
using the paired Student’s t test. The baseline and endpoint means and standard
errors of these data are summarized in Table 4 and presented in Figures 1-4 for
all VAS measures except for global wellbeing since there was no significant
difference in this clinical outcome for either group at any time point (see Table
4). With the exception of wellbeing in which there was a significant difference
between the two groups at the start of the study, there was no significant
difference between the mean values at baseline for the experimental and control
groups. In order to assess the time course of response to treatment with static
magnets, outcome data for pain, sleep, tiredness and fatigue were compared at
monthly intervals by averaging the weekly means for the experimental and
sham groups for each four-week period in the study. These comparisons are
shown in figures 5-8. As shown in figure 5, by the 4th week subjects in the
experimental group demonstrated a significant reduction in pain (p<.05) and
this continued to decrease through week 12, with no significant further
improvement by week 16. In contrast, there was no significant change in pain
for the control group over the entire 16-week period. Figure 6 indicates a
significant sleep improvement (p <.03) in the experimental group by week 12,
with still further improvement at week 16 (p <.01). No significant sleep
improvement was observed throughout the 16-week study period in the control
group. Figure 7 shows a significant improvement in fatigue in the experimental
group by week 8, with no further improvement by week 16. The control group
showed no significant improvement in fatigue throughout the study period.
Tiredness upon awakening improved significantly in both control and
experimental groups by week 12, demonstrating a placebo effect of the
magnetic field on this outcome parameter. Tiredness in the experimental group
further improved by week 16, whereas there was no further improvement in the
control group (figure 8). In addition to the five VAS measures taken weekly,
three dependent variables were scored at baseline and endpoint only: Total
Myalgic Score, modified FIQ, and Body Pain Drawings. These data were
analyzed for significance using the Student’s paired t test and are summarized
in Table 4. The Total Myalgic Score in the control group showed no significant
change over the 16-week period while the subjects in the experimental group
improved significantly from a mean = 30.3 ± 0.99 to a mean = 26.8 ± 1.5
(p<.05). The measure of daily functioning (FIQ) also remained constant for the
control subjects across the 16 weeks, while the experimental group improved
significantly from mean =7.6 ± 1.8 to a mean =5.3 ± 1.7 (p<.05). The results for
the Pain Drawing data were similar to the FIQ. Although Body Pain Drawing
Scores for the control subjects dropped somewhat over time, from mean =134 ±
26 to mean =109 ± 23, this was not significant (p=.19). The experimental group
improved significantly over time (p<.05) and by endpoint had less reported pain
than the sham treatment subjects. As with several of the VAS variables, there
was a tendency for subjects in the experimental group to have better scores at
the time of group assignment on both the FIQ and Pain Drawing. However,
neither difference approached significance (p=.21 and .57 respectively). The
correlations of these variables with patient weight were also not significant
(r=.32, p=.11;r=.13, p=.52),. Review of the daily diaries and discussion with the
subjects revealed that there had been no adverse effects related to the use of the
magnetic mattress pad during the trial period. Three of the experimental
subjects reported an intensification of their usual FM symptoms, i.e., aches,
pains and fatigue, which subsided after the first 7 to 10 days of mattress pad
use. One of the sham users noted increased anxiety during the first 2 weeks of
use.
DISCUSSION
This pilot study was undertaken to determine whether any clinical
improvements could be documented in patients with FM as a result of sleeping
on a magnetic mattress pad. The results demonstrate that subjects with FM who
slept on mattress pads containing permanent magnets delivering 200-600 G to
the skin surface, for a 16-week period, when compared to sham controls,
experienced statistically significant and clinically relevant pain reduction and
sleep improvement. This was evidenced by the self reported improved VAS for
pain, sleep, and fatigue, a reduction in the total myalgic score and the subject’s
own assessment of her body pain distribution. The diminished pain and
enhanced sleep also correlated with improvement in the subject’s functional
abilities for performing tasks of daily living as measured by the modified FIQ.
These results are especially salient when compared with drug trials in patients
with FM. Major clinical improvement in pain and/or sleep occurs in only 25%
of subjects taking tricyclic medications and certain other central nervous system
active medications4,28. The efficacy of these medications lessens with time and
the incidence of adverse effects is up to 98%3. The placebo effect seen in this
study has been reported in other clinical trials of patients with FM29,31,32. Of
interest here was the apparent beneficial effect of the firm mattress pad itself.
Subjects in both groups reported continued comfort with the hardness of the
mattress pad over the first half of the study period correlating with
improvement in fatigue on the VAS in both groups. However, this placebo
effect leveled off by week 8 in the control subjects, while the experimental
group continued to improve over the entire 16- week trial (see Figure 6). Seven
of eight outcome measures showed statistically significant improvement in the
experimental group, whereas only one of these eight measures improved
significantly in the sham subjects. The only difference between the two groups
was the addition of a static magnetic field, suggesting this therapeutic modality
was effective for the experimental subjects in this study There is no longer any
doubt that weak electromagnetic and static magnetic fields can modulate
biochemical processes in biological tissue in a physiologically meaningful
manner. Electromagnetic fields in current orthopedic clinical practice have been
employed to treat delayed and non-union fractures19,33-36, rotator cuff
tendinitis37, spinal fusions38 and avascular necrosis39 and were originally
employed for the treatment of infections in the pre-antibiotic era40. Successful
double blind clinical studies using non-thermal pulsed radio frequency signals
have been reported for chronic wound repair41, acute ankle sprains42, and
acute whiplash injuries 43,44. These signals were also shown to increase skin
microcirculation in diabetic patients45. There are numerous studies suggesting
the mechanism of action of EMF involves ion/ligand binding at regulatory
molecules and the increased release of cytokines and even neurotransmitters46-
49. At the clinical level EMF are known to reduce edema42 and increase
peripheral blood flow45, both of which might be factors in the pain reduction
from permanent magnets reported here. However, the exact mechanisms of
interaction which result in the pain reduction and sleep improvement observed
in this study are still unknown16-25,46,47. The particular magnets used in this
study have a surface field strength of approximately 1100 ± 50 G with a dose of
about 200-600 G being delivered to the subject23-25. This dosage is within the
range of reported bioeffects and takes into account the individual’s weight, how
much of the body surface contacted the mattress pad and whether the individual
was prone, side-lying or supine. The duration of magnetic exposure for any
given pain site can not be controlled in such a study. However, it is commonly
accepted that magnetic therapy acts as a trigger for a physiologically relevant
biochemical pathway, e.g., peripheral blood circulation and cytokine, release
since the magnetic field delivered to tissue is too weak to supply the energy for
such processes. Three experimental subjects documented an intensification of
their FM symptoms during the first 1 to 2 weeks of mattress pad use. This type
of "therapeutic exacerbation", a phenomenon observed by osteopathic
physicians, chiropractors, physical therapists and other body workers, is
characterized by a temporary worsening of symptoms during the initial weeks
of treatment. We are postulating that the small perturbations in the body’s
bioelectromagnetic field caused by magnet placement may be evoking the same
type of self limited "therapeutic exacerbation". The two recruits who initially
excluded themselves from the study had previously experienced an
exacerbation of symptoms while using permanent magnets on certain
acupuncture points. They reported increased pain, nausea and dizziness while
wearing the magnets, but obtained almost immediate relief of the symptoms
when the magnets were removed. There are other reports of certain individuals
who are particularly sensitive to electromagnetic fields50. This appears to be a
subset of the population who should be identified and studied further. The
limitations in this exploratory study suggest recommendations for future
studies. Stricter selection criteria should be implemented to exclude: subjects
who are on morphine-like drugs; subjects who are involved in significant life
changes such as marriage or divorce; anyone in the process of settling a medical
disability claim; and subjects in whom a psychiatric disorder is a dominant
feature. A certain range of weight should also be a selection criterion in order to
assure minimal baseline differences between the groups. Subjects should have
baseline VAS scores of at least 4 so as to eliminate a floor effect, i.e., when
patient entry scores show low levels of impairment or discomfort, there is little
room for measurable improvement. In addition, a lead-in assessment time for
the two-week period prior to actually using the mattress pads would provide a
more reliable baseline.
Actual duration of time spent on the mattress pads and usual sleeping position
should be more precisely documented.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study demonstrate that sleeping for
an average of 8 hours per night (prone, supine, or side-lying) on a mattress pad
(containing 270 domino shaped ceramic magnets, measuring 2.0 x 4.5 x 1 cm, 4
cm apart and arranged in a pattern of 15 rows across and 18 rows down) which
delivers a 200- 600 G static magnetic field, for 16 weeks, provides significant
pain relief and sleep improvement in women with FM. Because pharmaceutical
agents are associated with a high rate of adverse effects and offer only
minimum relief for the majority of patients, we recommend a trial of magnet
therapy, as a non-invasive, painless, low risk adjunct to standard medical and
physiatric interventions. Further controlled investigation of devices which
incorporate permanent magnets for the treatment of chronic and acute
musculoskeletal pain is definitely warranted. A minimum study period of 2
years is recommended to document long-term efficacy, assess the possibility for
habituation, and determine optimal dosimetry, including strength of magnetic
fields, exposure time and pole orientation. In this manner the efficacy of this
promising simple, non-invasive treatment for FM may be properly established.
*Magnetherapy, Inc. 950 Congress Avenue, Riviera Beach, FL 33404-6400
(800) 625-9736. Material in this manuscript was presented at the 4th annual
meeting of the North American Academy of Magnetic Therapy on January 24,
1998 in Los Angeles, CA and at the 20th annual meeting of the
Bioelectromagnetics Society on June 11, 1998 in St. Pete’s Beach, FL.
References
1. Wolfe F, Ross K, Anderson J, Russell I, Hebert L. The prevalence and
characteristics of fibromyalgia in the general population. Arthritis Rheum 1995;
38:19-27.
2. The Iowa Persian Gulf Study Group. Self-reported illness and health status
among Gulf War veterans. A population-based study. JAMA 1997; 15: 238-
245.
3. Goldenberg D. Fibromyalgia syndrome a decade later. What have we
learned? Arch Intern Med 1999;159:777-85.
4. Carette J, Bell MJ, Reynolds WJ, Haraoui B, McCain GA, Bykerk VP et al.
Comparison of amitrypline, cyclobenzaprine, and placebo in the treatment of
fibromyalgia. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum 1994;
37:32-40.
5. Wigers SH, Stiles TC, Vogel PA. Effects of aerobic exercise versus stress
management treatment in fibromyalgia. Scand J Rheumatol 1996; 25: 77-86
6. Deluze C, Bosia L, Zirbs A, Chantraine A, Vischer TL. Electroacupuncture
in fibromyalgia: results of a controlled trial. BMJ 1992; 305:1249-52
7. Haanen HCM, Hoenderdos HTW,van Romunde LKJ, Hop WCJ, Mallee C,
Terwiel JP, et al. Controlled trial of hypnotherapy in the treatment of refractory
fibromyalgia. J Rheumatol 1991;18: 72-5.
8. Ferraccioli G, Ghirelli L, Scita F, Nolli M, Mozzani M, Fontana, et al. EMG-
biofeedback training in fibromyalgia syndrome. J Rheumatol 1987;14: 820-5.
9. Goldenberg DL, Kaplan KH, Nadeau MG, Brodeur C, Smith S, Schmid CH.
A controlled study of a stress-reduction, cognitive-behavioral treatment
program in fibromyalgia. J Musculoskel Pain 1994; 2: 53-66.
10. Bassett CAL. Treatment of therapeutically resistant non-union with bone
grafts and pulsating electromagnetic fields. Bone Joint Surg 1982;64(8)1214-
1220.
11. Sisken BF, Walker J. Therapeutic aspects of electromagnetic fields for soft
tissue healing. In: Blank M, editor. Electromagnetic Fields. Biological
Interactions and Mechanisms. Washington DC: American Chemical Society,
1995.p.277-87.
12. Hong CZ, Lin JC, Bender LF, Schaeffer JN, Meltzer RJ, Causin P.
Magnetic necklace: its therapeutic effectiveness on neck and shoulder pain.
Arch Phy Med Rehabil 1982;63:462-6.
13. Valbona C, Hazlewood CF, Jurida G. Response of pain to static magnetic
fields in post-polio patients:a double-blind pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil
1997;78:1200- 3.
14. Weintraub MI. Magnetic bio-stimulation in painful diabetic peripheral
neuropathy: a novel intervention – a randomized, double-placebo crossover
study. Am J Pain Manag 1999;9:8-17.
15. Kazuo Shimodaira, San-Ikukai. Summary of a 12 month, double-blind,
clinical test of magnetic mattress pads, Tokyo Communication Hospital,
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo, Japan 1990.
16. Blank, M, editor. Electromagnetic Fields: Biological Interactions and
Mechanisms. Washington DC: American Chemical Society, 1995.
17. Markov MS, Pilla AA. Electromagnetic field stimulation of soft tissues.
Wounds 1995;7:143-151.
18. Bassett CAL. Fundamental and practical aspects of therapeutical uses of
pulsed electro- magnetic fields
(PEMFs). Critical Review of Biomedical Engineering. 1989:17:451-529.
19. Pilla AA. State of the art in electromagnetic therapeutics. In Electricity and
Magnetism in Biology and Medicine. M Blank, ed. San Francisco Press 1993.
20. Cohen D, Yoram P, Cuffin BN, Schmid SJ, editors. Magnetic Fields
Produced by Steady Currents in the Body. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Science USA. 1970;77 (3) pp 1447-1451.
21. Brighton, C, Pollack, S, editors. Electromagnet in Medicine and Biology.
San Francisco: San Fransisco Press, 1991.
22. Polk, C, Postow E, editors. Handbook of Biological Effects of
Electromagnetic Fields. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1996.
23. Todorov N. Magnetotherapy. Sofia: Medeitzina Physcultura Press, 1982.
24. Markov MS, Todorov N. Electromagnetic field stimulation of some
physiological processes. Studia
Biophysica 1984; 99: 151-56.
25. Markov MS. Biophysical Aspects of the application of electromagnetic
fields in orthopedics and traumatology. In Electromagnetic Therapy in Trauma
and Diseases of the Support-motor Apparatus. Detlavs, I, ed. Rija : Zinatie
Press 1984.
26. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, et al. The American College of
Rheumatology 1990 criteria for classification of fibromyalgia: report of the
Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 1990;
33:160-172.
27. Burckhardt CS, Clark SR, Bennett RM. The Fibromyalgia Impact
Questionnaire-development and validation. J Rheumatol 1991; 18: 728-33.18.
28. Goldenberg DL, Felson DT, Dinerman H: A randomized, controlled trial of
amitriptyline and naproxen in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia.
Arthritis Rheum. 1986;29:1371-1377
29. Moldofsky H, Liu FA, Mously C, Roth-Schechter B, Reynolds WJ The
effect of Zolpidem in patient with fibromyalgia: a double-blind, placebo
controlled, modified crossover study. J Rheumatol 1996;23:529-33.
30. Okifuji A, Turk DC, Sinclair JD, Starz TW, Marcus DA: A standardized
manual tender point survey.I.Development and determination of a threshold
point for identification of positive tender points in fibromyalgia syndrome. J
Rheumatol 1997;24:377-83.
31. Carette S, McCain GA, Bell DA, Fam AG. Evaluation of amitriptyline in
primary fibrositis: doubleblind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum
1986;29:655-659.
32. Russell IJ, Fletcher EM, Michalek JE, McBroom PC, Hester GC. Treatment
of primary fibrositis/fibromyalgia syndrome with Ibuprofen and alprazolam: a
double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum 1989;34:552-560.
33. Bassett CAL, Pilla AA, Pawluk RJ, A non-surgical salvage of surgically-
resistant pseudoarthroses and non-unions by pulsing electromagnetic fields.
Clin Orthop 1977;124:117-128.
34. Sharrard WJW. A double-blind trial of pulsed electromagnetic fields for
delayed union of tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 1990; 72B:347-352.
35. Brighton CT. The treatment of non-unions with electricity. J Bone Joint
Surg 1981; 63A:847-851.
36. Gossling HR, Bernstein RA, Abbott J. Treatment of ununited tibial
fractures: A comparison of surgery and pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF).
Orthopaedics 1992;15:711-719.
37. Binder A, Parr G, Hazleman B, Fitton-Jackson S. Pulsed electromagnetic
field therapy of persistent rotator cuff tendinitis. Lancet 1984; 8379:695-698.
38. Mooney V. A randomized double-blind prospective study of the efficacy of
pulsed electromagnetic fields for interbody lumbar fusions. Spine 1990;15:708-
711.
39. Aaron RK, Lennox D, Bunce GE, Ebert T. The conservative treatment of
osteonecrosis of the femoral head. A comparison of core decompression and
pulsing electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop 1989;249:209-216.
40. Ginsberg AJ, Ultrashort radiowaves as a therapeutic agent. Med Record
1934;140:651-653.
41. Salzberg CA, Cooper SA, Perez P, Viehbeck MG, Byrne DW. The effects
of non-thermal pulsed electromagnetic energy on wound healing of pressure
ulcers in spinal cord-injured patients: a
randomized, double-blind study. Ostomy Wound Management 1995;41:42-51.
42. Pilla AA, Martin DE, Schuett AM, et al., Effect of pulsed radiofrequency
therapy on edema from grades I and II ankle sprains: a placebo controlled,
randomized, multi-site, double-blind clinical study. J Athl Train 1996; S31:53.
43. Foley-Nolan D, Barry C, Coughlan RJ, O’Connor P, Roden D. Pulsed high
frequency (27MHz) electromagnetic therapy for persistent neck pain: a double
blind placebo-controlled study of 20 patients. Orthopedics 1990;13:445-451.
44. Foley-Nolan D, Moore K, Codd M, et al. Low energy high frequency pulsed
electromagnetic therapy for acute whiplash injuries: a double blind randomized
controlled study. Scan J Rehab Med 1992;24:51-59.
45. Mayrovitz H, Larsen P. A preliminary study to evaluate the effect of pulsed
radio frequency field treatment on lower extremity peri-ulcer skin
microcirculation of diabetic patients. Wounds 1995; 7:90- 93.
46. Pilla AA, Muehsam DJ, Markov MS, Sisken BF. EMF signals and
ion/ligand binding kinetics: prediction of bioeffective waveform parameters.
Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics 1999;48:27-34.
47. Muehsam DJ, Pilla AA. The sensitivity of cells and tissues to exogenous
fields: effects of target system initial state. Bioelectrochemistry and
Bioenergetics 1999;48:35-42.
48. Bull AW, Cherng, Jenrow SKA, Liboff AR, Weak magnetostatic fields alter
calmodulin-dependent cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase activity. In
Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine, M. Blank (ed.), San
Francisco Press, 1993, p. 319.
49. Nossol B, Buse G, Silny J. Influence of weak static and 50 Hz magnetic
fields on the redox activity of cytochrome-c oxidase, Bioelectromagnetics
1993;14:36.
50. Starlanyl D, Copeland ME. Fibromyalgia and Chronic Myofascial Pain
Syndrome. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications, 1996. p.75. TABLE 1.
Baseline demographic characteristics by treatment group.
Experimental Control
Age (yrs) 51.15 ± 13.50 48.17 ± 11.09
Weight (lbs)* 152.69 ± 37.19 178.33 ± 38.00
Months since 34.62 ± 30.81 40.00 ± 12.00
diagnosis
Marital status
Single 2 3
Married 3 4
Other 3 0
Employment status
Working 10 6
Not working 3 6
On Medical Disability 1 3
*Weight was the only significant variable (p=.005)
TABLE 2. Number of subjects in each group using FM related prescribed
medications.
Medication Experimental Control
Antidepressant 5 7
Anti-inflammatory 5 5
Anti-psychotic 0 1
Anxiolytic 1 6
Bladder 0 1
Gastrointestinal 2 5
Migraine 1 0
Muscle relaxant 1 3
Narcotic (mild) 0 4
Sleep aid 2 2
OTHER
Guafenesin 0 1
TABLE 3. Number of subjects in each group using other therapeutic
interventions.
Therapy Experimental Control
Acupuncture 5 6
Alexander technique 1 0
Chiropractic 3 3
Craniosacral 4 0
Exercise (home program) 4 3
Massage 1 2
Myofascial release 2 1
Myotherapy 2 0
Osteopathy 0 1
Psychotherapy 1 1
Ultrasound 1 0
TABLE 4. Overall results from five Visual Analog Scales, Total Myalgic
Score, Body Pain Distribution
Drawing, and Modified Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire by treatment group.
Values reported are means ±
SEM.
Experimental Control
n=13 n=12
Start Week 16 P
value
Start Week 16 P value
Pain 5.0 ± 0.45 3.4 ± 0.69 .04 5.7 ± 0.79 5.3 ± 0.85 .62
Sleep 5.9 ± 0.65 3.5 ± 0.52 .01 6.2 ± 0.80 4.5 ± 0.80 .149
Fatigue 6.4 ± 0.60 3.7 ± 0.58 .006 6.9 ± 0.52 5.8 ± 0.71 .176
Wellbeing 3.3 ± 0.68 2.6 ± 0.53 .438 5.4 ± 0.73 4.8 ± 0.88 .640
Tiredness 6.7 ± 0.80 4.1 ± 0.83 .019 7.3 ± 0.39 5.8 ± 0.75 .043
Myalgic Score 30.3 ± 0.99 26.8 ± 1.5 .025 30.6 ± 1.1 30.8 ± 0.61 .821
Pain Drawing 116 ± 20 62 ± 12 .015 134 ± 26 109 ± 23 .193
FIQ 1 7.6 ± 1.8 5.3 ± 1.7 .033 11.3 ± 2.2 11.6 ± 1.9 .845
Figure Legends
Figure 1: Effect on pain of sleeping nightly on a mattress pad delivering 200-
600
G static magnetic field to female patients with fibromyalgia. Use of a visual
analog scale (VAS) showed mean overall pain decreased significantly by 32%
for patients in the experimental group. The mean pain decrease of 7% for the
sham treated patients was not significant.
Figure 2: Effect on sleep of sleeping nightly on a mattress pad delivering 200-
600 G static magnetic field to female patients with fibromyalgia. Use of a visual
analog scale (VAS) showed sleep was significantly improved by 40% for
patients in the experimental group. The 27% change for the sham treated
patients was not significant.
Figure 3: Effect on fatigue of sleeping nightly on a mattress pad delivering
200- 600 G static magnetic field to female patients with fibromyalgia. Use of a
visual analog scale (VAS) showed fatigue was significantly decreased by 42%
for patients in the experimental group. The 16% change for the sham treated
patients was not significant.
Figure 4: Effect on tiredness upon awakening of sleeping nightly on a mattress
pad delivering 200-600 G static magnetic field to female patients with
fibromyalgia. Use of a visual analog scale (VAS) showed tiredness upon
awakening decreased by 39% for patients in the experimental group and by
21% for the sham treated patients. These changes were significant in both
groups, demonstrating a placebo effect of the magnetic field in this outcome
measure , possibly reflecting the added comfort of the mattress pad.
Figure 5: Time course of effect of static magnetic field therapy (200-600 G)
from mattress pads on pain in fibromyalgia. Each time point represents the
mean value for this outcome measure averaged over the prior four-week period.
Pain decreased significantly by week 8, with further decreases by week 16 in
the experimental group. In contrast there was no significant decrease in pain
throughout the 16-week trial period in the control group. Figure 6: Time course
of effect of static magnetic field therapy (200-600 G) from mattress pads on
sleep in fibromyalgia. Each time point represents the mean value for this
outcome measure averaged over the prior four-week period. Sleep improved
significantly by week 16 in the experimental group compared to no change in
this outcome measure in the control group throughout the 16-week trial period.
Figure 7: Time course of effect of static magnetic field therapy (200-600 G)
from mattress pads on fatigue in fibromyalgia. Each time point represents the
mean value for this outcome measure averaged over the prior four-week period.
Fatigue was significantly less in the experimental group by week 8 and was
maintained through week 16. In contrast there was no change in this outcome
measure in the control group throughout the 16-week trial period.
Figure 8: Time course of effect of static magnetic field therapy (200-600 G)
from mattress pads on tiredness upon awakening in fibromyalgia. Each time
point represents the mean value for this outcome measure averaged over the
prior fourweek period. This measure significantly decreased in both control and
experimental groups by week 8. In addition, both groups continued to decrease
significantly, at different rates, through week 16. A placebo effect of magnetic
field treatment was demonstrated for this outcome measure.
16
Tiredness (VAS, max=10)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Start
Week 16
Control
n=12
Experimental
n=13
* p < .04
*
*
Time (weeks)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Average Monthly Pain (VAS, max=10)
2
3
4
5
6
7 Control
Experimental
*
**
* p < .05
Time (weeks)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Mean Monthly Fatigue (VAS, max=10)
3
4
5
6
7
8
Control
Experimental
**
*
* p < .05
Time (weeks)
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Mean Monthly Tiredness (VAS, max=10)
3
4
5
6
7
8
Control
Experimental
*
*
* p < .05
Glaucoma Research Study
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
In this study, patients with primary open-angle glaucoma with compensated
intraocular pressure were administered magnetotherapy
using an ATOS device with 33-mT magnetic field induction. The procedure
was administered to a patient in a sitting posture with a magnetic inductor held
before the eye. Sessions lasted 10 minutes and each course included 10
sessions. Following 4-5 months of therapy, results showed improved vision
acuity 0.16 diopters, on an average of 29 out of 30 eyes with vision acuity
below 1.0. 149
References
149. Bisvas, et al., "Possibilities of Magnetotherapy in Stabilization of Visual
Function in Patients with Glaucoma," Vestn Oftalmol, 112(1), Jauary-March
1996, p. 6-8.
Hair Loss Rearch Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
CIENTIFIC STUDIES
This double-blind, placebo-controlled study examined the effects of pulsed
electromagnetic fields on hair loss in men suffering from male pattern baldness.
PEMF exposures were administered to the head for 12 minutes and were given
weekly or twice weekly over a period of 36 weeks. Results found the PEMF
treatment both prevented hair loss and promoted regrowth without side
effects.151
References
151. W.S. Maddin, et al., "The Biological Effects of a Pulsed Electrostatic with
Specific Reference to Hair: Electrotrichogenesis," International Journal of
Dermatology, 29(6), 1990, p. 446-450.
Headache Research Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
Results of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study demonstrated that the
administration of a pulsed magnetic field for less than one hour to headache
patients produced significant beneficial effects, as shown subjective patient
reports, as well as EEG activity.152 This article reports on the case of an acute
migraine patient who was successfully treated with external magnetic fields.153
This article examined the effects of millimeter wave therapy in the treatment of
107 patients suffering from headaches of varying causes. Treatment consisted
of the Nao-Hu, Bai-Huei, and Hua-Chai acupuncture points being exposed to
5.6- and 4.9-mm wavelengths via the use of "Yav'-1-5.6" or "Electronka-
KVCh" devices, respectively. Exposure lasted up to 60 minutes per day over a
course of 10 days. All patients experienced positive results following 3-5
exposures. After one year, 48 percent of patients remained free of headaches,
with a significant decrease in another 41 percent.154 This study examined the
effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields (20 minutes per day for 15 days) in the
treatment of patients suffering from chronic headaches. Results indicated the
treatment to be most effective in patients suffering from tension headaches,
with 88 percent of such patients reporting positive results. Beneficial results
were also experienced patients suffering from migraines (60 percent), cervical
migraines (68 percent), and psychogenic headaches (60 percent).155 In this
study, 90 headache patients were treated with pulsating electromagnetic fields
via large coils to the body for 20 minutes per day for a total of 15 days. Results
found the treatment to be either excellent or good for those patients suffering
from migraine, tension, and/or cervical headaches. Patients experiencing post-
traumatic or cluster headaches did not experience such benefits.156 Results of
this study indicated that pulsating electromagnetic fields (12 Hz and 5 mT)
were an effective prophylactic treatment for patients suffering from cervical and
migraine headaches.157 This placebo-controlled, double-blind study examined
the effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields (2-5 Hz and flux densities of 3-4
mT) on patients suffering from migraine headaches. PEMFs were administered
to the head for 10-15 minutes per day over a period of 30 days. Results showed
a mean improvement level of 66 percent in patients receiving the treatment,
compared to just 23 percent among controls.158
References
152. O. Grunner, et al., "Cerebral Use of a Pulsating Magnetic Field in
Neuropsychiatry Patients with Long-term Headache," EEG EMG Z
Elektroenzephalogr Verwandte Geb, 16(4), December 1985, p. 227-230.
153. R. Sandyk, "The Influence of the Pineal Gland on Migraine and Cluster
Headaches and Effects of Treatment with picoTesla Magnetic Fields,"
International Journal of Neurosci, 67(1-4), November-December 1992, p. 145-
171.
154. B.M. Popov & T.A. Al'shanskaya, "Use of Traditional and Non-traditional
Methods in the Treatment of Headache," Millimeter Waves in Medicine and
Biology. Digest of Papers of the 11th Russian Symposium with International
Participation, April 21-24, 1997, Zvenigorod, Moscow Region, Russia, p.68-71.
155. A. Prusinski, et al., "Pulsating Electromagnetic Field in the Therapy of
Headache," Hungarian Symposium on Magnetotherapy, 2nd Symposium, May
16-17, 1987, Szekesfehervar, Hungary, p. 163-166.
156. A. Prusinksi, et al., "Pulsating Electromagnetic Field in the Therapy of
Headache," Journal of Bioelectr., 7(1), 1988, p. 127-128.
 157. J. Giczi & A. Guseo, "Treatment of Headache Pulsating Electromagnetic
Field a Preliminary Report," Hungarian Symposium on Magnetotherapy, 2nd
Symposium, May 16-17, 1987, Szekesfehervar, Hungary, p. 74-76.
158. L. Lazar & A. Farago, "Experiences of Patients Suffering from Migraine-
Type Headache Treated with Magnetotherapy," Hungarian Symposium on
Magnetotherapy, 2nd Symposium, May 16-17, 1987, Szekesfehervar, Hungary, p.
137-140.
New Finding:
Water Can Help Your Heart!
Almost every day, new information comes to light on the relationship between
water and health. Now, study results published in the American Journal of
Epidemiology offer more evidence. The Loma Linda University study followed
20,000 participants over six years, who drank at least 40 ounces of water a day.
The results indicate that drinking more water may reduce the risk of heart attach
by 45 percent in women and 60 percent for men. The researchers believe that
drinking plenty of water could help to prevent life-threatening clots in the
bloodstream. Nikken Family Magazine – September/October 2002
Hemophilia Research Study
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
In this study, hemophiliacs suffering from joint hemorrhage received millimeter
wave (MW) therapy at biologically active points beginning on the first day of
hospital release. Adults were treated with an "Electronica-KVCh" device (61
GHz, 5 mW maximum power) and children were treated with a "Porog" device,
which generates low-intensity wide-band MMW noise. Exposures in both
groups lasted for 20-25 minutes per day and were extended over a period of 10
days. Results indicated the treatment to be more effective than conventional
therapy with respect to alleviation of pain, need for medication, and other
parameters.159
References
159. V.V. Aleschenko & I.O. Pisanko, "EHF-Therapy for Hemophylic
Arthropathy and Hemarthroses of the Knee Joint," Millimeter Waves in
Medicine and Biology. Digest of Papers of the 10th Russian Symposium with
International Participation, April 24-26, Moscow, Russia, 1995, p. 61-63.
Hepatitis Research Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This double-blind, placebo-controlled study examined the effects of millimeter
wave therapy combined with conventional methods in the treatment of viral
hepatitis in children. Making use of a "Yav'-1-5,6" or "Yav'-1-7,7" device, MW
therapy involved 14-15 exposures of, on average, 30 minutes per day at
wavelengths of either 5.6 or 7.1 mm. Results indicated the combined treatment
to be more effective than conventional treatment only, leading to a more rapid
restoration of liver function.160 Results of this study showed that the use of
magnetic fields was effective in treating patients suffering from viral hepatitis
who had previously not benefited from conventional drug therapies.161
This study examined the effects of magnetotherapy in children suffering from
various forms of viral hepatitis. Magnetotherapy consisted of alternating
magnetic fields applied to the liver area daily over a total of 10-15 days. Results
indicated magnetotherapy led to more rapid and trouble-free recovery.162
References
160. A.A. Shul'diakov, et al., "Electromagnetic Radiation of Millimeter Range
in Treatment of Children with Acute Viral Hepatitis," Millimeter Waves in
Medicine and Biology, 10th Russian Symposium with International
Participation, April 24-26, 1995, Moscow, Russia, p. 21-23.
161. I.A. Il'inskii, et al., "Experience with the Use of Glucocorticosteroids and
Magnetic Fields in the Intensive Therapy of Severe Forms of Viral Hepatitis,"
Soviet Medicine, 9, 1978, p. 72-74.
162. V.V. Krasnov & A.I. Shilenok, "Magnetotherapy of Hepatitis A and B in
Children," Pediatriia, 10, 1991, p. 54-57.
Herniated Disk Research Study
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This double-blind, placebo-controlled study examined the effects of
magnetotherapy in patients following herniated disk surgery. Results showed
that 52 percent of patients receiving the treatment compared to 30 percent of
controls reported being free of symptoms at the time of hospital release.163
References
163. K. Perjes, et al., "Effect of Magnetotherapy on Recovery After Herniated
Disk Surgery," Hungarian Symposium on Magnetotherapy, 2nd Symposium,
May 16-17, 1987, Szekesfehervar, Hungary, p. 159-162.
Hip Problems Research Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This double-blind study examined the effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields
on loosened hip prostheses. Results showed an increase of bone density in all
patients receiving PEMF treatment compared to only 60 percent of controls.
The authors argue such findings suggest PEMF elicits early bone
reconstruction, which enhances early weight bearing.164 This study examined
the effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields (50 Hz, 50 G) in treating aseptic
loosening of total hip prostheses. PEMF therapy consisted of 20 minutes per
day for 6 days per week over a total of 20 such sessions and was begun, on
average, a year and a half following the start of loosening. Results showed
PEMF to have some beneficial effects with respect to loosened hip
arthroplasties, although it was not effective in patients suffering severe pain due
to extreme loosening.165
References
164. G. Gualtieri, et al., "The Effect Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulation
on Patients Treated of Hip Revesions with Trans- Femoral Approach," Second
World Congress for Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine, 8-13
June 1997, Bologna, Italy.
165. K. Konrad, "Therapy with Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields in Aseptic
Loosening of Total Hip Protheses: A Prospective Study," Clinical
Rheumatology, 15(4), 1996, p. 325-328.
Incontinence Research Study
http://www.thirdage.com/news/archive/ALT02991227-03.html?hnav
A new study found 61 percent of women treated had a 50 percent better
reduction in incontinence episodes. The research was presented at the
International Bladder Symposium in Washington, D.C. Test subjects were
treated with Extracorporeal Magnetic Innervation therapy, a painless, non-
invasive 20-minute treatment twice a week for a number of weeks. The study
says a third of the women reported absolutely no leakage following the therapy,
known as NeoControl by brand. Dr. Peter Sand of Evanston Northwestern
Healthcare in Illinois says such a long-term response without continued
treatment is not seen after other therapies.
Gangrene on Diabetic Non-healing Wound on Sole &
Results from Using Infrared Led Light Therapy
Before Before After Before After
Results from using infrared led light therapy – Nikken’s new KenkoWave
20th World Congress of Dermatology, Paris, July 2002 Non-healing Diabetic
Ulcer treated using 660nm Red Phototherapy
Dr. Bipin Deshpande,
M.B.B.S, D.V.D., Consulting Dermatologist, Pune
Purpose of study
To assess the efficacy of 660nm Red Light LED Phototherapy for treating Non-
healing Diabetic Ulcer.
Methods
A 75-year male diabetic patient who had medicine controlled congestive
cardiac failure (CCF) & peripheral neuropathy developed a non-healing ulcer
over left sole following trauma. Examination & investigations revealed normal
blood sugar & signs of peripheral neuropathy of both legs without
vasculopathy. Patient had already taken all routine treatments for non-healing
wound in form of antibiotics, dressings, wound care management for 6 months,
which had failed. Initially, he was given a course of Cefadroxil 500mg BD for
one week to clear wound sepsis. Insulin was used to control Diabetes.
Wound size was 4cmx7cm at the start of the Phototherapy. 660nm narrow
band low energy red light was used for treatment of the wound on
alternate days (16 min. at a time). This therapy was given for 5 weeks,
which led to complete wound healing. Proper photography & follow-up
was done for one year.
Summary of results
Rapid & excellent wound healing was seen. Wound healed totally in 15
phototherapy sessions spread over 5 weeks.
New epithelium was thin, having good texture & without fibrosis. There was no
recurrence till today.
Conclusion
660nm Red Light Phototherapy was found to be very effective for healing of
this Non-healing Diabetic Ulcer where routine treatment failed.
Insomnia Research Studies
http://www.mediconsult.com/mc/mcsite.nsf/condition/sleep~journal+articles~
MCOR-47WMUS
Electromagnetic field works better than sleeping pills without side effects. To
test that hypothesis, researchers recruited 106 volunteers with insomnia through
the Scripps Clinic in La Jolla, California, and the University of Colorado Health
Sciences Center in Denver. Slightly over half of the subjects were women, and
their average age was 40. Their sleeping patterns were assessed using
polysomnography, a complete sleep evaluation that monitors breathing,
heartbeat, eye movement, muscle movement and a range of other factors.
Comparisons of the two groups showed that the group receiving
electromagnetic signals had slightly worse insomnia by standard measures
going into the test period. At the end of the four-week period, researchers
compared the somnographic records of both groups, and found that while a
placebo effect had increased total sleep time in the dummy-device patients by
about 13 minutes, the group using electromagnetic signals had gained an
average of over an hour-and-a-quarter in extra sleep, a 26% gain. They were
also far ahead in two other basic parameters of sleep: sleep latency (the number
of minutes spent in bed before dropping off) and sleep efficiency (the total
amount of time asleep as a proportion of the total amount of time spent in bed
trying to sleep). Again a placebo effect had reduced latency in the dummy
group by about six minutes to an average of about 28 minutes, but the
electromagnetic group's average latency had fallen by almost 22 minutes to just
over 18 -- a reduction of over half to a level that's considered normal for human
sleep. Sleep efficiency in the dummy group increased by 5.5% to 73.7%, while
in the electromagnetic group it climbed 16% to 78.6% (it had been worse to
start with). In the volunteers with the worst insomnia, who fell in the bottom
50% on all sleep parameters, total sleep time with the electromagnetic signals
increased by an average one hour 42 minutes. The patterns of sleep appeared to
have changed, too. There was a three times greater increase in rapid-eye
movement (REM) sleep in the electromagnetic group than in the placebo group.
That change has important implications in terms of sleep quality and restorative
value. The electromagnetic group was going through a more natural sleep
progression, with 30% more cycles -- a different result from that normally
obtained with sleeping pills, which tend to suppress certain natural sleep stages.
There was also less time spent awake after first falling asleep -- 55 minutes less
-- in the electromagnetic group, as opposed to only about 31 minutes less in the
dummydevice group. Finally, unless one includes increased awareness of
dreaming as a side effect, there were no negative changes associated with the
use of the electromagnetic signals. It appears to produce a more natural sleep
than pharmacological remedies, but without memory loss, mood changes,
daytime drowsiness or hangover. Most of those patients who did dream more
considered it a positive change, and most sleep specialists would agree that it is
likely to indicate physiologically more valuable sleep. Electromagnetic signals
therapy also did not appear to be weakened by rebound insomnia, as are many
drugs. Indeed, subjective data analysis from other studies suggests that while
benzodiazepines give their best results in the first week of use and then become
less effective, electromagnetic signals doesn't really begin working until the
seventh or eighth treatment (about 18 days). We have the first therapy ever to
increase the number of sleep cycles, and that's what many sleep authorities such
as Dr. Thomas Roth or Dr. Christian Guilleminault have told us -- that they've
never seen any sleeping pill that could increase the number of sleep cycles.
Restoring sleep cycles is the key to reproducing real physiological sleep,
because that means that the patient is reaching the stage of deepest sleep. Sleep
stages are separated by the REM stage of rapid-eye movement, when you move,
dream, roll your eyes, and have an erection if you're a man. Hence, the number
of REM periods tells us the number of sleep stages achieved. We found that
patients using the electromagnetic signals averaged significantly more periods
of REM each night than the placebo group. When we analyzed them, these
sleep cycles had normal duration and structure. We've looked at more than
1,000 patients, and followed them up for several years. The only side effect that
we noticed was increased dreaming. It seems, therefore, to be safe and well-
tolerated. We went to the FDA and got a green light to file. We haven't yet filed
for pre-market approval, but we hope to do so next year.
Joint Disease Research Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
Results of this 11-year study involving 3014 patients found pulsed magnetic
field treatment at low frequencies and intensities to be a highly effective, side-
effect-free therapy for joint disease.168
References
168. E. Riva Sanseverino, et al., "Therapeutic Effects of Pulsed Magnetic Fields
on Joint Diseases," Panminerva Med, 34(4), October-December 1992, p.187-
196.
Bio-Directed Joint Research Study
A recent research study was done on Nikken’s Bio-Directed Joint formula by
independent research groups outside of Nikken. It showed that the joint product
is effective on over 96% of the people who take it. We now have clinical
proof...
CLINIAL TRIAL SUMMARY:
A randomized double blind Phase III placebo study was done on 93 sufferers
of osteo-arthritis, who have been diagnosed with OA for an average of 6 years.
52 men and 41 women, aged 37-77 over a period of 60 day treatment period w/
Cetyl Meristoliate (CMC) which s the major active in Nikken's joint product.
Half of the population got the CM complex (6 CMC capsules per day) Half got
the placebo (6 vegetable oil capsules per day) (the capsules were
indistinguishable) Total of 153 affected joints in this population. 139 had
painful swelling. 100 had stiffness associated with degrees of deformity.
25 included some soft tissue involvement. Clinical assessments were conducted
in 3 visits over the 60 day period - Day 0, Day 30, and Day 60 Three major
areas of investigation:
Pain Range of motion
Physical activity indicators
Range of motion (physician assessment):
Participants lay face down and flex leg to determine maximum angle of flexion
using gorionimeters (sp?) Also questionnaires: completed at each visit -
Lequesne Indices baseline)
Range of Motion Results:
Day 0:
CMC - 86 degrees
Placebo - 82 degrees
Day 30:
CMC - 93 degrees
Placebo - 84 degrees
Day 60:
CMC - 96 degrees
Placebo - 83 degrees
Walking Capabilities:
Maximum distance you can walk in 15 minutes.
Day 0:
CMC - 700 feet
Placebo - 700 feet
Day 60:
CMC - 2300 feet
Placebo - 700 feet
Walking Up and Down Stairs:
Walking Upstairs -
CMC - 35% improvement
Placebo - 12% improvement
Walking Downstars -
CMC - 43% improvement
Placebo - 11% improvement
Knee Bending:
More than 2-fold improvement
Day 30 -
CMC - 17% improvement
Placebo - 7% improvement
Day 60 -
CMC - 23% improvement
Placebo - 12% improvement
Kidney Research Study
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This review article notes that placebo-controlled studies have shown positive
results concerning the use of pulsed magnetic field therapy in the treatment of
secondary chronic pyelonephritis.171
References
171. V.A. Kiyatkin, "Pulsed Magnetic Field in Therapy of Patients with
Secondary Chronic Pyelonephritis," Second World Congress for Electricity and
Magnetism in Biology and Medicine, 8-13 June 1997, Bologna, Italy.
Liver Research
In a double-blind study of sixty people with alcohol-related diseases (damaged
livers), 70% had normalized their liver enzymes after only 30 days’ usage of
our Liver Formula in therapeutic doses (3 capsules twice each day). The Bio-
Directed Liver is very important for every one to take. The liver is a critical
organ with primary responsibility for detoxification. To learn more about liver
function, visit this informative site:
http://www.liverdoctor.com/
Some important points about Nikken’s Bio-Directed Nutritionals:
- Bio-directed means the ingredients target specific tissues in the body. Every
product has everything you need for that particular area. Like the digestion has
the herbs, enzymes, etc. that you need. The womens has all that you need for
hormonal health and bone health.
- The formulas are customized to compliment Nikken’s other technologies.
Everything works synergistically together.
- The formulas are proprietary, produced only for Nikken under the highest
pharmaceutical standards – USP (U.S. Pharmacopeia).
- Design allows all to be taken – without concern over too much of anything.
You can take all of the nutritionals without worrying about taking too much of
anything.
- They are all whole foods with all the good left in tack.
Lou Gehrig's Disease Research Study
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This study reports on three patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who
experienced beneficial effects following treatment consisting of three sessions
per week of pulsed magnetic fields administered via a Magnobiopulse
apparatus. Patients received upwards of 75 total sessions prior to achieving
maximum recovery.3
References
3. A. Bellosi & R. Berget, "Pulsed Magnetic Fields: A Glimmer of Hope for
Patients Suffering from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis," Second World
Congress for Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine, 8-13 June
1997, Bologna, Italy.
Lung Disease Research Study
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This study examined the effects of low-frequency magnetic fields coupled with
conventional therapies in rats suffering from inflammatory lung disease. Results
showed that rats receiving the magnetic fields experienced significant
reductions in lung abscesses and associated symptoms, and similar beneficial
effects were seen among a group of 165 human patients receiving comparable
treatment.177
References
177. L.V. Iashchenko, "Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields in the Combined
Therapy of Inflammatory Lung Diseases," Probl Tuberk, 3, 1988, p. 53-56.
Lupus Erythematosus Research Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This review article examined the data concerning impulsed magnetic fields in
the treatment of lupus erythematosus. Studies indicate that the treatment can be
beneficial due to its anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects, its positive action
on microcirculation, and immunological reactivity.178 This double-blind,
placebo-controlled study examined the effects of UHF and microwave therapy
in treating patients suffering from systemic lupus. Twenty-six patients were
given 30-35 W of microwave irradiation administered to the adrenal region.
Twenty-five patients were given 30-35 W UHF administered bilaterally to the
temporal region. The treatment regimen for both groups included 18-
20 daily sessions. A group of 11 patients were used as controls. Results showed
both treatments to be effective, with 27 percent of microwave patients and 66
percent of UHF patients reporting total elimination of polyarthralgia, myalgia,
and painful contractures.179 Results of this study indicated that the bitemporal
application of ultrahigh-frequency electromagnetic fields to the
hypothalamohypophyseal area daily over a period of 18-20 days had beneficial
effects in patients suffering from systemic lupus erythematosus.180
References
178. I.V. Khamaganova, et al., "The Use of a Pulsed Magnetic Field in the
Treatment of Lupus Erythematosus," Ter Arkh, 67(10), 1995, p. 84-87.
179. V.D. Sidorov & S.B. Pershin, "Immunomodulating Effect of Microwaves
and Ultrahigh Frequency Electric Field in Patients with Systemic Lupus
Erythmatosus," Bioelectrochem Bioenerg, 30, 1993, p. 327-330.
180. V.D. Sidorov, et al., "The Immunomodulating Effect of Microwaves and
of an Ultrahigh-Frequency Electrical Field in Patients with Systemic Lupus
Erythematosus," Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult, (4), 1991, p. 36-40.
Magnetic Insoles Study
Date: 6/26/2001
The following is a brief report on how magnetic insoles help reduce balance
problems. Effect of magnetic insoles on postural sway measures in men and
women during a static balance test. Suomi R, Koceja DM. School of Health,
Exercise Science and Athletics, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point 54481,
USA. rsuomi@uwsp.edu - states that numerous anecdotal reports have
suggested a growing public enthusiasm for magnetic devices for treatment of
pain and various motor and sensory dysfunction's. In this study the
effectiveness of magnetic insoles on postural sway measures during a single
application were investigated. Twenty-eight adults were assessed on postural
sway measures while performing a static twolegged stance test on a Kistler
force platform under two treatment conditions (magnetic insoles, non-magnetic
insoles). Significant reductions in total sway area and lateral sway scores were
obtained by the older adults while standing on the magnetic insoles. These
preliminary results indicate that treatment of postural instability using magnetic
insoles are a viable alternative for older adults.
Magnetic Mattress Pads Research Study
Summary of a 12-month, double-blind, clinical test of magnetic mattress
pads carried out by San-ikukai Hospital, Tokyo Communications Hospital
and Kouseikai Suzuki Hospital, by Dr. Kazuo Shimodaira.
The mattress pads used in this study were typical full-size pads containing 124
permanent ferrite magnets with magnetic field strengths of 750-950 gauss each.
The pads themselves were made oil two sheets of felt with the magnets
sandwiched between them. The felt sheets were then wrapped in a cloth cover.
'The total number of subjects of this double-blind clinical experiment was 43 l
(216 male, 215 female). 375 subjects were given the magnetic pads, 56 were
given non-magnetic pads. None of the 431 subjects knew which pad they were
sleeping on. Subjects selected for the experiment were those with chief
complaints related to:
Neck and shoulder pain
Back and lower back pain
Back pain (general)
Lower limb pain
Insomnia
Fatigue
To determine the presence of any side effects, blood pressure, hemoglobin,
number of erythrocytes, and number of leucocytes were examined before and
after the use of the mattress pads. Besides blood sedimentation, and TP, COL,
ALP, GOT, GPT, Na, and K were also examined, as were functions of the
kidneys, liver, pancreas, and the entire circulatory system.
Results
Positive No#
Symptom Cases Results % Results %
Neck and 66 47 71.2 19 28.8
shoulder pain
Back and lower 76 61 80.3 15 19.7
back pain
Back pain 31 25 80.7 6 19.3
(general)
Lower limb pain 68 54 79.4 14 20.6
Insomnia 70 61 87.1 9 12.9
Fatigue 64 53 82.8 11 17.2
Out of 375 total subjects with symptoms, 301 (80.27%) reported positive
results. 74 cases (19.73%) reported no results.
Time of Response
The percentage of subjects who realized the effect of the magnetic mattress pad
within 3 days:
Neck and shoulder pain 46.9%
Back and lower back pain 50.0%
Back pain 38.7%
Lower limb pain 54.4%
Insomnia 64.3%
Fatigue 57.8%
Out of 375 total subjects who slept on the magnetic mattress pads, 200 (53.3%)
realized the effects within 3 days. Over 70% realized
the effects within 5 days.
Conclusion:
Dr. Shimodaira's conclusion of this year-long study conducted in 3 of Japan's
foremost hospitals: "The magnetized health mattress pad is proved to be
effective on neck and shoulder pain, back and lower back pain, back pain,
lower limb pain, insomnia, and fatigue, and to have no side effects."
Magnetic Research & Library Information
From Nikkens website
http://www.5pillars.com/Content/Mind/Index.cfm?url=MagneticResearch4-
2001.html
Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
From: http://www.tnp.com/encyclopedia/therapy/1/5/
Multiple Sclerosis A 2-month double-blind placebo-controlled study of 30
individuals with multiple sclerosis was conducted using a PEMF device.13
Participants were instructed to tape the device to one of three different
acupuncture points on the shoulder, back, or hip. The study found statistically
significant improvements in the treatment group, most notably in bladder
control, hand function, and spasticity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: http://www.micronauts.com/magnetic.htm
A study published in the 1989 journal of Psyschoenergetics reported an 80%
improvement in multiple sclerosis patients. This was a double blind study using
almost 100 patients.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Study reported in the book “The Pain Relief Break Through” by Julian
Whitaker:
Dr. Reuven Sandyk, now associated with Tuoro College in Dix Hills, New
York, conducted a case study, on the effect of an extremely low
electromagnetic field on a 55 year old woman with MS. When the patient came
to Sandyk, she was in bad shape. Her legs ere numb. She could not stand
without a cane, and she could hardly walk at all. She was incontinent and her
speech was garbled and hoarse. She felt exhausted, had memory lapses, and
found it difficult to do simple arithmetic. Her vision had faded to the point
where she could only barely read a newspaper. She was hardly able to draw
even a very simple picture of a house. The woman was exposed to
electromagnetic treatments. The first treatment, which lasted 20 minutes, was a
sham; the magnet device was simply not turned on. The second treatment,
lasting the same length of time, exposed her to an electromagnetic force of 7.5
picotesla with a frequency of 5 Hz.
The results, even as couched in Dr. Sandyk’s conservative, muted words, were
spectacular: “While placebo magnetic treatment produced no change in the
patient’s motor disability or drawing performance, treatment with MF resulted
in an almost immediate clinical response, with the patient reporting
improvement of vision with images appearing clearer and brighter.” She rose
from her chair faster, was less unsteady, and even walked for several minutes
without the support of a walker. She reported that she had immediately
experienced a feeling of relaxation and mood elevation, and it was noted that
she smiled spontaneously several times. The woman was asked to repeat the
drawing of a house and showed improved performance, adding further details
that suggested enhancement of “visuoconstructive abilities.” A week after the
electromagnetic treatment, the woman reported that she had felt more energetic
and more optimistic during the preceding week. She said her head felt “clearer,”
and her concentration had improved. Sleep had also improved, in part due to
“stabilization of her bladder functions.” Her legs felt stronger, the numbness in
the lower extremities was less, and her balance was better. She was able to walk
in her apartment with greater stability, sometimes using only a cane. Best of all,
she reported no side-effects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
Following are descriptions of recent studies, published in peer-reviewed
scientific journals, on the impact of treatment with magnetic fields on
Multiple Sclerosis:
1. This article on Multiple Sclerosis reports on the case of a 55-year-old female
chronic progressive multiple sclerosis patient who received a single external
application of low magnetic fields (7.5- picotesla; 5-Hz frequency) which lasted
20 minutes. The treatment quickly led to improvements in a variety of areas,
including fatigue, sleep, vision, bladder function, movement and speech
problems, and mood.182
2. This study reports on four cases of multiple sclerosis who experienced
improvements in visuospatial and visuomotor functions following treatment
with external application of low magnetic fields.183
3. This article reports on the case of a 50-year-old female chronic progressive
multiple sclerosis patient who received a single external application of low
magnetic fields who experienced significant improvements following the
treatment.184
4. This article reports on the cases of three patients suffering from long-time
symptoms of multiple sclerosis who received treatment with extracerebral
pulsed electromagnetic fields over a period of between 6 and 18 months.
Results showed all three patients experienced significant improvements in
cognitive functions.185
5. This is a report on the cases of two chronic multiple sclerosis patients
exhibiting severe speech problems. Symptoms were completely resolved
following 3-4 weeks of treatment with pulsed electromagnetic fields.186
6. This article reports on the cases of three multiple sclerosis patients suffering
from alexia (lack of understanding of written words) who experienced a
reversal of the alexia following the start of picotesla-range electromagnetic field
treatment.187
7. This article reports on the case of a middle-aged disabled female patient with
a 19-year history of chronic relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Within one
day of receiving experimental treatment with picotesla electromagnetic fields,
the patient exhibited improvements in her condition. The patient continued with
1-2 treatments per week over a period of 32 months. During this time,
significant improvements were seen with respect to a range of physical
symptoms, as well as cognitive functions.188 8. The cases of three female
multiple sclerosis patients exhibiting suicidal behavior are discussed in this
article. Treatment with pulsed picotesla-level electromagnetic fields resolved
the suicidal behavior in all three patients, an improvement that was maintained
over a follow-up period of 3.5 years.189 9. This article reports on the case of a
36-year-old man severely disabled with partial paralysis and lack of
coordination. Three treatment sessions per week with pulsed electromagnetic
fields over a period of one year led to a range of improvements, including
improvements in gait, balance, bowel and bladder functions, vision, mood, and
sleep. No progression of symptoms associated with multiple sclerosis was seen
throughout the course of EMF treatment.190 10. This article reports on the
cases of two multiple sclerosis patients suffering from chronic ataxia who
performed poorly on human figure drawing tests administered to measure body
image perception. Treatment with extracerebral applications of picotesla flux
electromagnetic fields led to improvements in gait and balance as well as a
normalization in body image perception as seen on a repeat of the same test
each patient.191
11. This article reports on the case of a 51-year-old female patient with
remitting-progressive multiple sclerosis who experienced a successful reduction
in carbohydrate craving believed to be associated with the exacerbation of her
condition following treatment with a series of extracranial AC pulsed
applications of picotesla flux intensity electromagnetic fields.192 12. This
article reports on the cases of three multiple sclerosis patients suffering from a
chronic progressive course of the disease who experienced a reduction in
tremors following treatment with brief external applications of pulsed EMFs of
7.5-pT intensity.195
13. This article reports on the cases of three female chronic multiple sclerosis
patients who experienced a reversal of cognitive deficits following treatment
with brief external applications of alternating pulsed electromagnetic fields in
the picotesla range of intensity.196
14. This article reports on the cases of three female multiple sclerosis patients
with poor word fluency who experienced a 100-percent increase in word output
following 4-5 sessions of treatment with external applications of extremely
weak electromagnetic fields in the picotesla range of intensity.197
15. This article reports on the case of a 58-year-old male multiple sclerosis
patient with a 37-year history of the disease. Treatment with external
application of magnetic fields in the picotesla range led to a speedy
improvement of neurological symptoms in the areas of walking, balance,
sensory symptoms, and bladder function. Improvements in numerous cognitive
functions were seen within 24 hours of treatment as well.198
16. This article reports on the case of a 36-year-old multiple sclerosis patient
who experienced immediate improvements in visuoperceptive functions
following treatment with external application of picotesla-range magnetic
fields.199
17. This article reports on the cases of three multiple sclerosis patients suffering
from falls due to rapid deterioration in balance and triggered distracting external
auditory stimuli. Treatment with a series of extracranially applied, low-
frequency picotesla-range intensity electromagnetic fields quickly resolved such
symptoms associated with a loss of balance.200
18. This article reports on the cases of three multiple sclerosis patients
experiencing continuous and debilitating daily fatigue over the course of several
years. Treatment with extracranially applied picotesla flux electromagnetic
fields dramatically improved symptoms of fatigue in all three patients.201
19. This article reports on the cases of two female patients with chronic
progressive-stage multiple sclerosis who suffered from regular worsening of
their symptoms starting approximately a week prior to menstruation and abating
at menstruation onset. Such symptoms were resolved in both patients two
months following the start of treatment with the extracranial application of
weak electromagnetic fields.205
20. This article reports on the case of a 64-year-old female patient with a 22-
year history of chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. Two 30-minute
treatments with low-level electromagnetic fields produced a marked
improvement in a variety of symptoms.207
21. Results of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study found that pulsed
electromagnetic fields administered daily over a period of
15 days proved to be an effective treatment in reducing spasticity and
incontinence associated with multiple sclerosis.209
22. Results of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study indicated that pulsed
electromagnetic fields administered daily over a period of 15 days is a generally
effective treatment in reducing symptoms associated with multiple sclerosis,
with the most positive improvements involving the alleviation of spasticity and
pain.210
23. Results of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study indicated that
exposure to magnetic fields produced beneficial clinical effects in patients
suffering from cerebral paralysis and in patients with multiple sclerosis.211
References
182. R. Sandyk, "Rapid Normalization of Visual Evoked Potentials picoTesla
Range Magnetic Fields in Chronic Progressive Multiple Sclerosis,"
International Journal of Neurosci, 77(3-4), August 1994, p. 243-259.
183. R. Sandyk, "Further Observations on the Effects of External picoTesla
Range Magnetic Fields on Visual Memory and Visuospatial Functions in
Multiple Sclerosis," International Journal of Neurosc, 77(3-4), August 1994,
203-27
184. R. Sandyk, "Successful Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis with Magnetic
Fields," International Journal Neurosci, 66(3-4), October 1992, p. 237-250.
185. R. Sandyk, "Progressive Cognitive Improvement in Multiple Sclerosis
from Treatment with Electromagnetic Fields," International Journal of
Neurosci, 89(1-2), January 1997, p. 39-51.
186. R. Sandyk, "Resolution of Dysarthria in Multiple Sclerosis Treatment with
Weak Electromagnetic Fields," International Journal of Neurosci, 83(1-2),
November 1995, p. 81-92.
187. R. Sandyk, "Reversal of Alexia in Multiple Sclerosis Weak
Electromagnetic Fields," International Journal of Neurosci, 83(1-2), November
1995, p. 69-79.
188. R. Sandyk, "Long Term Beneficial Effects of Weak Electromagnetic
Fields in Multiple Sclerosis," International Journal of Neurosci, 83(1-2),
November 1995, p. 45-57.
189. R. Sandyk, "Suicidal Behavior is Attenuated in Patients with Multiple
Sclerosis Treatment with Electromagnetic Fields," International Journal of
Neurosci, 87(1-2) October 1996, p. 5-15.
190. R. Sandyk, "Treatment with Electromagnetic Field Alters the Clinical
Course of Chronic Progressive Multiple Sclerosis--A Case Report,"
International Journal of Neurosci, 88(1-2), November 1996, p. 75-82.
191. R. Sandyk, "Effect of Weak Electromagnetic Fields on Body Image
Perception in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis," International Journal of
Neurosci, 86(1-2), July 1996, p. 79-85.
192. R. Sandyk, "Treatment with Weak Electromagnetic Fields Attenuates
Carbohydrate Craving in a Patients with Multiple
Sclerosis," International Journal of Neurosci, 86(1-2), July 1996, p. 67-77.
193. R. Sandyk, "Reversal of an Acute Parkinsonian Syndrome Associated with
Multiple Sclerosis Application of Weak Electromagnetic Fields," International
Journal of Neurosci, 86(1-2), July 1996, p. 33-45.
194. R. Sandyk & L.C. Dann, "Resolution of Lhermitte's Sign in Multiple
Sclerosis Treatment with Weak Electromagnetic Fields," International Journal
of Neurosci, 81(3-4), April 1995, p. 215-224.
195. R. Sandyk & L.C. Dann, "Weak Electromagnetic Fields Attenuate Tremor
in Multiple Sclerosis," International Journal of Neurosci, 79(3-4), December
1994, p. 199-212.
196. R. Sandyk, "Reversal of Visuospatial Hemi-inattention in Patients with
Chronic Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Treatment with Weak Electromagnetic
Fields," International Journal of Neurosci, 79(3-4), December 1994, p. 169-184.
197. R. Sandyk, "Improvement in Word-fluency Performance in Patients with
Multiple Sclerosis Electromagnetic Fields," International Journal Neurosci,
79(1-2), November 1994, p. 75-90.
198. R. Sandyk & R.P. Iacono, "Improvement PicoTesla Range Magnetic
Fields of Perceptual-motor Performance and Visual Memory in a Patient with
Chronic Progressive Multiple Sclerosis," International Journal of Neurosci,
78(1-2), September 1994, p. 53- 66.
199. R. Sandyk & R.P. Iacono, "Multiple Sclerosis: Improvement of
Visuoperceptive Functions PicoTesla Range Magnetic Fields," International
Journal of Neurosci, 74(1-4), January-February 1994, p. 177-189.
200. R. Sandyk, "Application of Weak Electromagnetic Fields Facilitates
Sensory-motor Integration in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis," International
Journal of Neurosci, 85(1-2), March 1996, p. 101-110.
201. R. Sandyk, "Treatment with Weak Electromagnetic Fields Improves
Fatigue Associated with Multiple Sclerosis," International Journal of Neurosci,
84(1-4), February 1996, p. 177-186.
202. R. Sandyk, "Resolution of Partial Cataplexy in Multiple Sclerosis
Treatment with Weak Electromagnetic Fields," International Journal of
Neurosci, 84(1-4), February 1996, p. 157-164.
203. R. Sandyk, "Weak Electromagnetic Fields Restore Dream Recall in
Patients with Multiple Sclerosis," International Journal of Neurosci, 82(1-2),
May 1995, p. 113-125.
204. R. Sandyk, "Weak Electromagnetic Fields Improve Body Image
Perception in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis," International Journal of
Neurosci, 82(3-4), June 1995, p. 285-302.
205. R. Sandyk, "Premenstrual Exacerbation of Symptoms in Multiple Sclerosis
is Attenuated Treatment with Weak Electromagnetic Fields," International
Journal of Neurosci, 83(3-4), December 1995, p. 187-198.
206. R. Sandyk & K. Derpapas, "Successful Treatment of an Acute
Exacerbation of Multiple Sclerosis External Magnetic Fields," International
Journal of Neurosci, 70(1-2), May 1993, p. 97-105.
207. R. Sandyk & R.P. Iacono, "Resolution of Longstanding Symptoms of
Multiple Sclerosis Application of PicoTesla Range Magnetic Fields,"
International Journal of Neurosci, 70(3-4), June 1993, p. 255-269.
208. R. Sandyk & K. Derpapas, "Magnetic Fields Normalize Visual Evoked
Potentials and Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis,"
International Journal of Neurosci, 68(3-4), February 1993, p. 241-253.
209. A. Guseo, "Double-Blind Treatments with Pulsating Electromagnetic Field
in Multiple Sclerosis," Hungarian Symposium on Magnetotherapy, 2nd
Symposium, May 16-17, 198 , Szekesfehervar, Hungary, p. 85-89.
210. A. Guseo, "Pulsing Electromagnetic Field Therapy of Multiple Sclerosis
the Gyuling-Bordacs Device: Double-Blind, Cross-Over and Open Studies,"
Journal of Bioelectr., 6(1), 1987, p. 23-35.
211. A. Sieron, et al., "The Variable Magnetic Fields in the Complex Treatment
of Neurological Diseases," European Bioelectromagnetics Association, 3rd
International Congress, 29 February - 3 March 1996, Nancy, France.
Muscle Injury Research Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
CIENTIFIC STUDIES
This study examined the effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on recovery
following muscle injury in rats. Results showed that both pulsed and constant
magnetic fields were equally effective, with the constant field being more
intense.212 This study examined the effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields
(Gyuling-Bordacs device) in patients suffering from peripheral muscle
paralysis. Treatment consisted of 20-minute exposures (2-50 Hz, 70 G). Results
showed 50-Hz pulsed electromagnetic fields to be the most effective level of
treatment and that such therapy enhanced muscle irritability in peripheral
paralysis patients as well as in healthy controls.213
References
212. I.E. Detlav, "The Influence of Constant and Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields
on Oxidation Processes in Muscle," in I.E. Detlav, (ed.), Electromagnetic
Therapy of Injuries and Diseases of the Support-Motor Apparatus. International
Collection of Papers, Riga, Latvia: Riga Medical Institute, 1987, p. 12-16.
213. L. Mecseki, et al., "The Study of the Efficacy of Magnetotherapy in
Peripheral Paralysis," Hungarian Symposium on Magnetotherapy, 2nd
Symposium, 16-17 May 1987, Szekesfehervar, Hungary, p. 149-158.

Neck Pain Research Study

http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This double-blind, placebo-controlled study examined the effects of low-energy
pulsed electromagnetic fields administered via soft collars on patients suffering
from persistent neck pain. Results indicated significantly beneficial effects
following three weeks of treatment.214
References
214. D. Foley-Nolan, et al., "Low Energy High Frequency (27.12 MHZ)
Therapy for Persistent Neck Pain. Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial,"
Bioelectromagnetics Society, 12th Annual, June 10-14, 1990, San Antonia, TX,
p. 73.
Bactericidal Effects of Negative Air Ions on Airborne and
Surface
Salmonella Enteritidis
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?
cmd=Retrieve&db=Pub
Med&list_uids=11198431&dopt=Abstract
Seo KH, Mitchell BW, Holt PS, Gast RK.
USDA/ARS Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, Athens, Georgia 30605,
USA. The bactericidal effect of high levels of negative ions was studied using a
custom-built electrostatic space charge device. To investigate whether the ion-
enriched air exerted a bactericidal effect, an aerosol containing Salmonella
Enteritidis (SE) was pumped into a sealed plastic chamber. Plates of XLT4 agar
were attached to the walls, top, and bottom of the chamber and exposed to the
aerosol for 3 h with and without the ionizer treatment. The plates were then
removed from the chamber, incubated at 37 degrees C for 24 h, and colonies
were counted. An average of greater than 10(3) CFU/plate were observed on
plates exposed to the aerosol without the ionizer treatment (control) compared
with an average of less than 53 CFU/plate on the ionizertreated plates. In
another series of experiments, the SE aerosol was pumped for 3 h into an empty
chamber containing only the ionizer and allowed to collect on the internal
surfaces. The inside surfaces of the chamber were then rinsed with 100 ml
phosphate-buffered saline that was then plated onto XLT4 plates. While the
rinse from the control chamber contained colony counts greater than 400
CFU/ml of wash, no colonies were found in the rinse from the ionizer-treatment
chamber. These results indicate that high levels of negative air ions can have a
significant impact on the airborne microbial load, and that most of this effect is
through direct killing of the organisms. This technology, which also causes
significant reduction in airborne dust, has already been successfully applied for
poultry hatching cabinets and caged layer rooms. Other potential applications
include any enclosed space such as food processing areas, medical institutions,
the workplace, and the home, where reduction of airborne and surface
pathogens is desired. PMID: 11198431 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Nerve Damage Research Studies
PEER-REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC STUDY
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This controlled study found that exposure to pulsed electromagnetic fields
enhanced the speed and degree of peripheral nerve regeneration twofold in rats
with experimentally severed sciatic nerves.215 Results of this controlled study
demonstrated that treatment with 15 minutes per day of pulsed electromagnetic
fields enhanced recovery time of experimentally-injured nerves in rats
.216 Results of this study indicated that the use of pulsed electromagnetic fields
on experimentally divided and sutured nerves in rats sped up regeneration of
damaged nerves and the time it took for limb use to be recovered.
219 This study examined the effects of a Soviet Polyus-1 low-frequency
magnetotherapy device used to administer approximately 10 mT for
approximately 10 minutes in patients with optic nerve atrophy. Patients
underwent 10- 15 sessions per course. Results showed that vision acuity in
patients with low acuity values (below 0.04 diopters) improved in 50 percent of
cases. It was also found that the treatment improved ocular blood flow in cases
of optic nerve atrophy. Optimal benefits were experienced after 10 therapy
sessions.220
REFERENCES
215. H. Ito & C.A. Bassett, "Effect of Weak, Pulsing Electromagnetic Fields on
Neural Regeneration in the Rat," Clin Orthop, (181), December 1983, p. 283-
290.
216. A.R. Raji & R.E. Bowden, "Effects of High-peak Pulsed Electromagnetic
Field on the Degeneration and Regeneration of the Common Peroneal Nerve in
Rats," Journal of Bone Joint Surg, 65(4), August 1983, p. 478-492.
219. A.M. Raji, "An Experimental Study of the Effects of Pulsed
Electromagnetic Field (Diapulse) on Nerve Repair," Journal of Hand Surg, 9(2),
June 1984, p. 105-112.
220. L.V. Zobina, et al., "Effectiveness of Magnetotherapy in Optic Nerve
Atrophy. A Preliminary Study," Vestn Oftalmol, 106(5), September-October
1990, p. 54-57.

Neurological Disorders Research Studies

PEER-REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC STUDY
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This article summarizes clinical results obtained the authors in using pulsed
electromagnetic fields (Gyuling- Bordacs device) in the treatment of
neurological and locomotor disorders among a group of 148 patients in a
hospital setting over a period of 3 years. The authors claim that 58-80 percent of
such patients experienced benefits of some kind over the course of
magnetotherapy.221 This study examined the effects of magnetotherapy on
patients suffering from nervous system diseases. Treatment consisted of 10-12
6-minute exposures (10-20 kG, 0.1-0.6 Hz). Results indicated beneficial effects
in 25 of the 27 patients receiving the treatment.222 Results of this study found
that the use of magnetic fields (30-35 mT, 10 and 100 Hz) produced beneficial
effects in 93 percent of patients suffering from nerve problems.223
REFERENCES
221. G. Terlaki, "Clinical Experiences Magnetotherapy," Hungarian
Symposium on Magnetotherapy, 2n Symposium, 16-17 May 1987,
Szekesfehervar, Hungary, p. 175-179.
222. A.A. Skorometz, et al., "Magnetic Impulse Therapy of Patients with
Spondylogenic Diseases of the Nervous System," Fizicheskaia Meditzina, 3(1-
2), 1993, p. 41-43.
223. A.G. Shiman, et al., "Use of Combined Methods of Magnetoelectrotherapy
in the Treatment for Polineuropathies," Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult,
(5), 1993, p, 38-41.
Osteoarthritis Research Studies
From: http://www.tnp.com/encyclopedia/therapy/1/5/
Three double-blind placebo-controlled studies enrolling a total about 350
individuals suggest that pulsed electromagnetic field therapy can improve
symptoms of osteoarthritis. In one of these studies, 27 individuals with
osteoarthritis (mostly of the knee) found that pulsed electromagnetic field
therapy could improve pain and mobility.11 Participants received 18 half-hour
sessions of PEMF over the course of a month, from a specially designed
noncontact air-coil device. The control group received treatment with a sham
device. According to several criteria, treated participants experienced
statistically significant improvement as compared to the placebo group, had less
pain, and showed improved functional performance of the affected areas. No
side effects were observed. Another study conducted by the same team the
following year found similar results in 86 individuals with osteoarthritis of the
knee and 81 with osteoarthritis of the cervical spine.12 Receiving the same 18
half-hour sessions with either the PEMF or sham device, the treated participants
with OA of the knee averaged a 29 to 36% improvement in pain and mobility
by the end of treatment, while the placebo group averaged 11 to 19%
improvement. In the group suffering from OA of the spine, improvement in the
treatment group averaged 30 to 35% at the end of treatment, again superior to
placebo. For both OA conditions, benefits lasted for at least a month after
treatment was stopped. A more recent double-blind trial evaluated low power,
extremely low frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields for the treatment of
knee osteoarthritis.39 A total of 176 individuals received 8 sessions of either
sham or real treatment over a period of 2 weeks. The results showed
significantly greater pain reduction in the treated group.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES (PEER-REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC STUDIES)
Results of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study indicated that exposure to
pulsed electromagnetic fields had beneficial effects in the treatment of patients
suffering from painful osteoarthritis of the knee or cervical spine. PEMF
therapy consisted of 18 exposures lasting 30 minutes and administered 3-5
times per week. 224 This double-blind, placebo-controlled study indicated that
treatment with pulsed electromagnetic fields produced significant favorable
effects in patients suffering from osteoarthritis.226 This double-blind, placebo-
controlled study showed that treatment with pulsed electromagnetic fields
yielded significant benefits in patients suffering from osteoarthritis of the knee
or cervical spine. PEMF therapy (25 G, 5-24 Hz) consisted of 18 30-minute
exposures over a period of 3-4 weeks.227 This controlled study examined the
effects of changeable magnetic fields (Polus-101 device) coupled with more
conventional therapies in the treatment of patients suffering from osteoarthrosis.
Magnetic therapy consisted of daily 20 minute exposures for a total of 12
sessions. Results showed more rapid improvements of immunological indices
and alleviation of symptoms associated with the disease among patients
receiving the combination therapy compared to those treated only
conventionally.228
REFERENCES
224. D.H. Trock, et al., "The Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields in the
Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Cervical Spine. Report of
Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Trials," Journal of
Rheumatology, 21(10), 1994, p. 1903-1911.
226. D.H. Trock, et al., "Treatment of Osteoarthritis with Pulsed
Electromagnetic Fields," Bioelectric Repair and Growth Society, Vol.
XIII, 13th Annual Meeting, 10-13 October 1993, Dana Point, CA, p. 14.
227. A.J. Bollet, et al., "Treatment of Osteoarthritis with Pulsed
Electromagnetic Fields," European Bioelectromagnetics Association, 2nd
Congress, 9-11 December 1993, Bled Slovenia, p. 46.
228. L. Yurkiv, et al., "The Use of Changeable Magnetic Field in Treatment of
Osteoarthrosis," European Bioelectromagnetics Association, 3rd International
Congress, 29 February-3 March 1996, Nancy France.
The Journal of Rheumatology
http://www.jrheum.com/abstracts/abstracts02/1708.html
Cetylated Fatty Acids Improve Knee Function in Patients with Osteoarthritis
ROBERT HESSLINK Jr, DAVID ARMSTRONG III, M.V. NAGENDRAN,
SRINAN SREEVATSAN, and RAJ BARATHUR ABSTRACT.
Objective. To determine the benefit of cetylated fatty acids (CFA) on knee
range of motion and function in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Methods.
Sixty-four patients with chronic knee OA were evaluated at baseline and at 30
and 68 days after consuming either placebo (vegetable oil; n = 31) or CFA
(CeladrinTM; n = 33). Evaluations included physician assessment, knee range
of motion with goniometry, and the Lequesne Algofunc tional Index (LAI).
Results. After 68 days, patients treated with CFA exhibited significant (p <
0.001) increase in knee flexion (10.1°) compared to patients given placebo
(1.1°). Neither group reported improvement in knee extension. Patient
responses to the LAI indicated a significant (p < 0.001) shift towards functional
improvement for the CFA group (-5.4 points) after 68 days compared to a
modest improvement in the placebo group (-2.1 points). Conclusion. Compared
to placebo, CFA provides an improvement in knee range of motion and overall
function in patients with OA of the knee. CFA may be an alternative to the use
of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs for the treatment of OA. (J Rheumatol
2002;29:1708-12)
Key Indexing Terms:
FATTY ACIDS
FISH OILS
OSTEOARTHRITIS
CETYL MYRISTOLEATE
5-LIPOXYGENASE
From Hesslink Ventures and ClinCyte, San Diego, California, USA, and the
Medical Center, Manipal, India. Supported in part by a research contract
awarded to ClinCyte by Imagenetix, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA. R. Hesslink Jr,
ScD; D. Armstrong III, PhD, Hesslink Ventures; M.V. Nagendran, MD,
Medical Center, Manipal; S. Sreevatsan, PhD; R. Barathur, PhD, ClinCyte.
Address reprint requests to Dr. R. Hesslink Jr, PO Box 501691, San Diego, CA
92150.
Submitted July 27, 2001; revision accepted February 14, 2002.
Osteoporosis Research Studies
PEER-REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This study examined the effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields on
postmenopausal osteoporosis in 10-monthold female rats. Results showed that
EMF treatment for one hour per day for 4 months with a 30-gauss maximum
pulse reduced bone mass loss to within 10 percent, while a 70-gauss maximum
pulse reduced bone mass loss entirely.232 This study examined the effects of
long-term pulsing electromagnetic fields in the form of repetitive pulse burst
waves over a period of 6 months in osteoporotic rats. Results showed increased
bone volume and formation activity.234 This study examined the effects of a
72-Hz pulsating electromagnetic field administered for 10 hours per day over a
period of 12 weeks on bone density in women prone to osteoporosis. Results
found significant increases in bone mineral density in the area of EMF
exposure.235 In this study, osteoporosis patients received treatment with pulsed
electromagnetic fields (50 G, 50-100 Hz) for 30 minutes per session over a
period of two years involving 20 sessions. These subjects were compared to
similar patients treated with calcitonin. Results indicated PEMF to be effective
in reducing pain, and to be even more so when combined with the conventional
drug treatment.236 This controlled study examined the effects of pulsed
electromagnetic fields in women suffering from postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Treatment consisted of daily 30-minute exposures for 20 days every six months.
Results showed that PEMF treatment combined with 100 IU per day of nasal
spray synthetic salmon calcitonin arrested bone decrease and significantly
increased bone mass relative to patients receiving drug therapy alone.237
Results of this study found the use of total-body low-frequency magnetic fields
(60 G, 50-100 Hz) to be effective in the treatment of patients suffering from
osteoporosis-related symptoms. Treatment consisted of a total of 15 exposures
of 30 minutes each.238
232. A. Zati, et al., "Effects of Pulsed Magnetic Fields in the Therapy of
Osteoporosis Induced Ovariectomy in the Rat," Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper, 69(7-8),
July-August 1993, p. 469-475.
233. C.T. Rubin, et al., "Prevention of Osteoporosis Pulsed Electromagnetic
Fields," Journal of Bone Joint Surg, 71(3), March 1989, p. 411-417.
234. S. Mishima, "The Effect of Long-term Pulsing Electromagnetic Field
Stimulation on Experimental Osteoporosis of Rats," Sangyo Ika Daigaku
Zasshi, 10(1), March 1, 1988, p. 31-45.
235. F. Tabrah, et al., "Bone Density Changes in Osteoporosis-prone Women
Exposed to Pulsed
Electromagnetic Fields (PEMFs)," Journal of Bone Miner Res, 5(5), May 1990,
p. 437-442.
236. T.W. Bilotta, et al., "The Use of Low-Frequency Low Magnitude PEMFs
in Treatment of Osteoporosis," Journal of Bioelectr, 8(2), 1989, p. 316.
237. T.W. Bilotta, et al., "Influence of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Post-
Menopausal Osteoporosis," First World Congress for Electricity and
Magnetism in Biology and Medicine, 14-19 June 1992, Lake Buena Vista, FL,
p. 78.
238. G. Saveriano & S. Ricci, "Treatment of Senile Osteoporosis Caused
Rachialgia with Low-Frequency PEMFs," Journal of Bioelectr, 8(2), 1989,
p.21.
Pancreatitis Research Study
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This study found that sinusoidal and continuous low-frequency alternating
magnetic field generated a Polius-1 apparatus exhibited beneficial effects in
patients suffering from chronic pancreatitis.241 This controlled study examined
the effects of combining pulsed electric stimulation and laser light with
conventional treatment in patients suffering from acute pancreatitis. Results
showed the combined therapy to have the most significant effects in patients
with severe forms of the disease.242
References
241. A.A. Fedorov, et al., "The Use of a Low-frequency Magnetic Field in the
Combined Therapy of Chronic Pancreatitis," Vopr
Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult, (5), September-October 1990, p. 28-30.
242. O.G. Savina, et al., "A Low-Frequency Pulsed Current and a Low-
Intensity Laser Radiation in the Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis," Vopr
Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult, (2), 1995, p. 39-40.
Parkinson’s Research Studies
http://www.cogreslab.demon.co.uk/Magnetsmed.htm
Sandyk of the University of Thrace, Greece, has presented numerous papers in
a peer-reviewed journal (Intl. J. Neuroscience) reporting individual cases of
successful Parkinson’s and MS treatment by means of picoTesla alternating
fields (Sandyk, 1993; 1994). He suggests that these fields influence the pineal
gland and inhibit the secretion of melatonin, thereby reducing hyperglycaemia..
Admittedly these are not static, but their flux density is much lower than the
earth’s half a gauss geomagnetic field, which continually oscillates around a 20
nanoTesla variation. One might even argue that such minute oscillations are
indispensable for cellular processes in living creatures, though their mechanism
of interaction is not understood: it is said that astronauts are now routinely
supplied with an artificial earth’s field during space flights following severe
mental problems arising in its absence. Surprisingly little research has followed
up Sandyk’s remarkable findings, though the present NASA space program is
investigating performance in aged subjects, which completes the connection
with Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s, both being diseases of age.
Other Parkinson’s Research Studies
PEER-REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC STUDY
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This article reports on the case of a 73-year-old male Parkinson's patients
suffering from disabling resting and postural tremors in the right hand, as well
as other symptoms. Two successive 20-minute treatments with AC pulsed
electromagnetic fields of 7.5-picotesla intensity and 5-Hz frequency sinusoidal
wave led to improvements in visuospatial performance and a legible signature.
Significant improvements in Parkinsonian motor symptoms were also seen
following additional treatments.243 This article reports on the case of a
medicated 61-year-old Parkinson's patient who experienced rapid reversal of
symptoms following a single external application of picotesla-range magnetic
fields.244 This article reports on four Parkinson's patients who experienced
significant improvement in symptoms following treatment with picotesla-range
magnetic fields. Two additional patients suffering from Parkinson's-related
dementia experienced significant improvements in visuospatial impairment.245
Noting that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a new and noninvasive
method of direct cortical neuron stimulation, this review article discusses recent
studies showing that TMS has led to improvements in symptoms associated
with Parkinson's disease and depression.246 Results of this study showed that
the application of ELF magnetic fields via a plastic helmet device housing a set
of coils (generating fields of 8 Hz and 7.5 pT) produced beneficial clinical
effects after 30 minutes in patients suffering Parkinson's disease and multiple
sclerosis.247 This article reports on the cases of two Parkinson's patients who
experienced improvements in motor symptoms following treatment with
external application of weak electromagnetic fields in the picotesla range.248
This article reports on the cases of three Parkinson's patients on full medication
who exhibited an improvement in right hemispheric functions following a series
of treatments with external application of electromagnetic fields in the picotesla
range.249 This article reports on the case of a nonmedicated 49-year-old male
Parkinson's patient who experienced a dramatic improvement in motor,
depressive, and cognitive symptoms following treatment with brief extracranial
applications of picotesla-range electromagnetic fields.251 This article reports
on the case of a 61-year-old Parkinson's patient who experienced improvements
in the severity of motor problems 30 minutes after treatment with external
application of weak electromagnetic fields in the picotesla range. Sham
treatment had no such effects in the same patient.252 This article reports on the
cases of five Parkinsonian patients on full medication who experienced a
marked improvement in performance on Thurstone's Word-Fluency Test
following treatment with a series of extremely-low-intensity electromagnetic
fields in the picotesla range and of 5-8 Hz frequency.253 This article reports on
the case of a 69-year-old Parkinsonian patient who was able to discontinue most
medication for two weeks following two treatment sessions with extracranial
picotesla-range magnetic fields. Symptoms recurred after three weeks and the
patient received four more magnetic field sessions on consecutive days after
four weeks. The patient was then able to discontinue medications
completely.254 This article reports on the cases of five medicated Parkinsonian
patients who experienced improvements in motor, behavioral, and autonomic
functions, and in visuoconstructional tasks following treatment with
extracranial application of magnetic fields in the picotesla range.255 This
article reports on the cases of three medicated Parkinsonian patients who
experienced relief from disabling periods of freezing gait following treatment
with extracerebral applications of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the picotesla
range.256 The cases of four nondemented Parkinsonian patients under full
medication are discussed in this article. These patients performed poorly on
human figure drawing tests administered to measure body image perception.
Treatment with extracerebral applications of picoteslarange intensity
electromagnetic fields led to marked improvements in body image perception as
seen on a repeat of the same test each patient.257
This article reports on the cases of four medicated Parkinsonian patients who
experienced reversal of visuospatial impairments as measured the Clock
Drawing Test following treatment with externally applied weak electromagnetic
fields of picotesla-range intensity.258
This article reports on the case of a 68-year-old male patient suffering from
Parkinson's disease over a period of 7 years. The patient had experienced little
relief from traditional medical therapy. Treatment with external application of
picotesla-range magnetic fields led to quick improvements with respect to
tremor and foot dystonia, gait, postural reflexes, mood, anxiety, and cognitive
and autonomic functions.259 This article reports on the cases of four
Parkinsonian patients who exhibited significant improvements in motor
symptoms following treatment with externally applied magnetic fields of
picotesla-range intensity.260 This article reports on two cases of fully
medicated Parkinson's patients who experienced enhanced visuoperceptive
functions as measured numerous drawing tests following extracranial treatment
with picotesla-range magnetic fields.261 This article reports on the case of a 69-
year-old Parkinsonian patient on full medication who experienced a marked
improvement on several different drawing tests following 30 minutes of
treatment with picotesla-range magnetic fields.262 This article reports on the
case of a Parkinson's patient suffering from severe movement problems who
received treatment with external artificial weak magnetic fields with a
frequency of 2 Hz and intensity of 7.5 picotesla over a period of 6 minutes.
Results showed a significant attenuation in disability and near total reversal of
the symptoms lasting approximately 72 hours. The patient then applied
equivalent magnetic fields on a daily basis at home. Sustained improvement
was seen throughout an observation of one month.263 This article reports on
the case of a 67-year-old male patient suffering from Parkinson's disease and
levodopa-related motor fluctuations. Treatment with the application of external
weak magnetic fields led to improvements in general Parkinsonian symptoms
along with the amelioration of "on-off" symptoms.264
REFERENCES
243. R. Sandyk, "Brief Communication: Electromagnetic Fields Improve
Visuospatial Performance and Reverse Agraphia in a Parkinsonian Patient,"
International Journal of Neurosci, 87(3-4), November 1996, p. 209-217.
244. R. Sandyk & R.P. Iacono, "Reversal of Visual Neglect in Parkinson's
Disease Treatment with picoTesla Range Magnetic Fields," International
Journal of Neurosci, 73(1-2), November 1993, p. 93-107.
245. R. Sandyk, "Magnetic Fields in the Therapy of Parkinsonism,"
International Journal of Neurosci, 66(3-4), October 1992, p. 209-235.
246. M.S. George, et al., "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A
Neuropsychiatric Tool for the 21st Century," Journal of Neuropsychiatry Clin
Neurosci, 8(4), Fall 1996, p. 373-382.
247. J. Bardasano, et al., "Extracranial Device for Noninvasive Neurological
Treatments with Pulsating ELF Magnetic Fields," Second World Congress for
Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine, 8-13 June 1997, Bologna,
Italy.
248. R. Sandyk, "Parkinsonian Micrographia Reversed Treatment with Weak
Electromagnetic Fields," International Journal of Neurosci, 81(1-2), March
1995, p. 83-93.
249. R. Sandyk, "Improvement in Short-term Visual Memory Weak
Electromagnetic Fields in Parkinson's Disease," International Journal
of Neurosci, 81(1-2), March 1995, p. 67-82.
250. R. Sandyk, "Weak Electromagnetic Fields Reverse Visuospatial Hemi-
inattention in Parkinson's Disease," International Journal of Neurosci, 81(1-2),
March 1995, p. 47-65.
251. R. Sandyk, "A Drug Naive Parkinsonian Patient Successfully Treated with
Weak Electromagnetic Fields," International Journal of Neurosci, 79(1-2),
November 1994, p. 99-110.
252. R. Sandyk & R.P. Iacono, "Reversal of Micrographia in Parkinson's
Disease Application of picoTesla Range Magnetic Fields," International Journal
of Neurosci 77(1-2), July 1994, p. 77-84.
253. R. Sandyk, "Improvement in Word-fluency Performance in Parkinson's
Disease Administration of Electromagnetic Fields," International Journal of
Neurosci, 77(1-2), July 1994, p. 23-46.
254. R. Sandyk, "Treatment of Parkinson's Disease with Magnetic Fields
Reduces the Requirement for Antiparkinsonian Medications,
International Journal of Neurosci, 74(1-4), January-February 1994, p. 191-201.
255. R. Sandyk, "Reversal of a Visuoconstructional Deficit in Parkinson's
Disease Application of External Magnetic Fields: A Report of Five Cases,"
International Journal of Neurosci, 75(3-4), April 1994, p. 213-228.
256. R. Sandyk, "Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease is Improved
Treatment with Weak Electromagnetic Fields," International Journal of
Neurosci, 85(1-2), March 1996, p. 111-124.
257. R. Sandyk, "Improvement of Body Image Perception in Parkinson's
Disease Treatment with Weak Electromagnetic Fields," International Journal of
Neurosci, 82(3-4), June 1995, p. 269-283.
258. R. Sandyk, "Reversal of Visuospatial Deficit on the Clock Drawing Test in
Parkinson's Disease Treatment with Weak Electromagnetic Fields,"
International Journal of Neurosci, 82(3-4), June 1995, p. 255-268.
259. R. Sandyk & K. Derpapas, "The Effects of External picoTesla Range
Magnetic Fields on the EEG in Parkinson's Disease," International Journal of
Neurosci, 70(1-2), May 1993, p. 85-96.
260. R. Sandyk & K. Derpapas, "Further Observations on the Unique Efficacy
of PicoTesla Range Magnetic Fields in Parkinson's Disease," International
Journal of Neurosci, 69(1-4), March-April 1993, p. 67-83.
261. R. Sandyk & R.P. Iacono, "Rapid Improvement of Visuoperceptive
Functions picoTesla Range Magnetic Fields in Patients with Parkinson's
Disease," International Journal of Neurosci, 70(3-4), June 1993, p. 233-254.
262. R. Sandyk, "The Effects of PicoTesla Range Magnetic Fields on
Perceptual Organization and Visual Memory in Parkinsonism," International
Journal of Neurosci, 73(3-4), December 1993, p. 207-219.
263. R. Sandyk, et al., "Magnetic Fields in the Treatment of Parkinson's
Disease," International Journal of Neurosci, 63(1-2), March 1992, p. 141-150.
264. R. Sandyk, "Weak Magnetic Fields in the Treatment of Parkinson's
Disease with the "On-off" Phenomenon," International Journal o Neurosci,
66(1-2), September 1992, p. 97-106.

Pneumonia Research Studies

http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
Results of this study showed that magnetic laser therapy decreased the severity
of acute respiratory insufficiency and treatment course, and prevented
destructive complications in children with infiltrative acute destructive
pneumonia between the ages of 1 and 12 years.266
References
266. E.A. Gaidashev, et al., "An Evaluation of the Effect of Magnetic-laser
Therapy on External Respiratory Function in Complicated Forms of Acute
Pneumonia in Children," Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult, (3), May-June
1995, p. 12-14.
Post Polio
From: http://www.tnp.com/encyclopedia/therapy/1/5/
A double-blind placebo-controlled study of 50 individuals with post-polio
syndrome found evidence that magnets are effective for relieving pain.2 The
magnets were placed on previously determined trigger points (one per person)
for 45 minutes. (Trigger points are sore areas within muscle that, when pressed,
cause relief in other areas of the muscle, and conversely, when inflamed, cause
pain in other parts of the muscle.) In the treatment group, 76% of the
participants reported improvement, compared to 19% in the placebo group.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: http://www.archives-pmr.org/abs78_11/v78n11p1200.html
A 1997 study published in the Archives of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation looked at 50 patients with post-polio pain. The research by Dr.
Carlos Vallbona, a professor at Baylor University College of Medicine in
Texas, found that of 29 patients who wore magnets, 76 percent reported a
decrease in pain after 45 minutes. Those who got placebos reported only slight
improvement. Another study was performed examining the effect of bipolar
magnets on post-polio syndrome, a condition characterized by muscle
tenderness and pain in patients who have had polio. The condition occurs years
after the original damage from the polio virus. Application of magnets to these
tender, painful spots was shown to alleviate pain in this double-blind placebo-
controlled study, the results of which were published in the November 1997
issue of the "Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation".
Psychiatric Disorders Research Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
Noting the well-established dangers associated with electroconvulsive therapy,
the author, in this theoretical article, argues that transcranial magnetic
stimulation should be looked at as an alternative psychiatric treatment. The
author asserts that TMS has several advantages over ECT in that it is painless,
noninvasive, and more effective on deep structures of the brain.277
References
277. T. Zyss, "Deep Magnetic Brain Stimulation - The End of Psychiatric
Electroshock Therapy?" Medical Hypotheses, 43(2), 1994, p. 69-74.
Schizophrenics Research Study
http://www.foxnews.com:80/health/032400/brain.sml
In a research letter published in the Lancet Medical Journal in March of 2000,
scientists at Yale University in Connecticut, said Schizophrenic sufferers they
had studied reported fewer hallucinations after brain stimulation. 12
schizophrenics who had daily hallucinations were divided into two groups. In
all but one case, hallucination severity was lower after the active stimulation
sequence. Schizophrenia is the most common form of severe mental illness
Reconstructive Surgery
http://www.charlotte.com/observer/0207magnetstudy.htm
By JANE E. ALLEN
Los Angeles Times
Research published in the December issue of the Journal of Plastic and
Reconstructive Surgery studied 20 patients recuperating from liposuction of
excess body fat, or "love handles." In the research by Dr. Daniel Man, a board-
certified plastic surgeon in Boca Raton, Fla., 10 patients wore magnetic pads on
their wounds; 10 others had sham magnets in the pads Those who got the
magnetic pads had less pain in the first week, less swelling in the first four days
and less black-and-blue discoloration in the first three days than did the control
group.
Respiratory Problems Research Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
Results of this study showed that the use of low-frequency magnetic fields
helped to prevent and treat critically ill patients suffering from
pyoinflammatory bronchopulmonary complications, and to prevent such
complications as well.278 This article reports on the case of a schizophrenic
patient suffering from respiratory difficulties associated with neuroleptic
withdrawal. Treatment using external application of picotesla-range magnetic
fields quickly attenuated the severity of such problems.279
References
278. G.A. Mozhaev & IIu Tikhonovskii, "The Prevention and Treatment of
Suppurative-inflammatory Complications in the Bronchopulmonary System
During Prolonged Artificial Ventilation," Anesteziol Reanimatol, (4), July-
August 1002, p. 47-51. 279. R. Sandyk & K. Derpapas, "Successful Treatment
of Respiratory Dyskinesia with picoTesla Range Magnetic Fields,"
International Journal of Neurosci, 75(1-2), March 1994, p. 91-102.
Rheumatism Research Studies
A double-blind controlled trial of 64 individuals with rheumatoid arthritis of the
knee compared the effects of strong alternating polarity magnets (See How to
Use Magnet Therapy for definition) with a deliberately weak unipolar
magnet.36 Researchers used the weakened magnet as a control group so that
participants wouldn’t find it easy to break the blind by testing the magnetism of
their treatment. Patients were assessed daily for one week. After one week of
therapy, 68% of the participants using the strong magnets (the "treatment
group") reported relief, as compared to 27% in the control group, and this
difference was statistically significant. Four other measurements of symptom
severity showed greater benefits in the treatment group than in the control
group, but in only two of these were the differences statistically significant.
Treatment did not alter results of blood tests for inflammation severity, nor did
it change physician’s assessment of joint tenderness, swelling or range of
motion. This study suggests that magnet therapy may reduce the pain of
rheumatoid arthritis without altering actual inflammation. However, the mixture
of statistically significant and insignificant results indicates that a larger trial is
necessary to factor out "statistical noise."
From: http://www.tnp.com/encyclopedia/therapy/1/5/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: http://www.cogreslab.demon.co.uk/Magnetsmed.htm
The disease is believed to be caused by an infection that prompts the immune
system to form damaging aggregates of antigen and antibody. Treatment is
confined to control of inflammation and the relief of pain by bedrest, splintage,
physiotherapy, and antiinflammatory or pain killing drugs. Several studies on
this disorder report beneficial effects with pulsed magnetic fields in
combination with conventional management (Kocian et al., 1985a, 1985b;
Jezek, 1990). In a large study of cervical osteochondritis Detlavs (1987) applied
static magnetic fields (100-400 gauss, 15-20 minutes duration, 10-20
treatments) to 425 patients, of whom 138 were male. The results were a
significant improvement in arterial tonus and venous tonation as measured by
rheography, in some patients after 3-6 exposures and in all by the end of
treatment. An earlier study on patients with rheumatoid arthritis (Aryshenskaya,
1977) used a static magnetic field (150-350 gauss, 10 minutes, 10-20
exposures) reported that patients in stages 1 and 2 responded well, not only
clinically, but also as measured by laboratory parameters such as % albumin,
gamma globulin and fibrinogen (gm/l). In gamma globulins a decrease of 24%
was observed.

Schizophrenia
http://www.foxnews.com:80/health/032400/brain.sml
In a research letter published in the Lancet Medical Journal in March of 2000,
scientists at Yale University in Connecticut, said Schizophrenic sufferers they
had studied reported fewer hallucinations after brain stimulation. 12
schizophrenics who had daily hallucinations were divided into two groups. In
all but one case, hallucination severity was lower after the active stimulation
sequence. Schizophrenia is the most common form of severe mental illness
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Magnet Therapy Helps Schizophrenics:
http://www.mercola.com/2000/mar/26/magnet_schizophrenia.htm
Using magnets to stimulate a particular area of the brain appears to help
auditory hallucinations experienced by patients with schizophrenia. About 50%
to 70% of patients with schizophrenia report having auditory hallucinations,
often in the form of imaginary voices. Drugs offer little help, and these
hallucinations can cause distress, disability, and leave patients unable to control
their behavior. The investigators applied a lowfrequency magnetic field to the
left temporoparietal cortex of each patient for 4 minutes the first day, which
increased by 4 minutes each day to 16 minutes on day 4. For comparison
purposes, each patient also went through a "sham" stimulation, where patients
had similar treatment but did not receive a magnetic field. The treatment was
well tolerated, and there was significant improvement in the hallucination
severity after 12 and 16 minutes of active stimulation. The severity of
hallucinations was reduced in all but one patient. However, in the 8 patients
classified as responders, the hallucinations returned after a period ranging from
4 days to 2 months after the treatment.
The Lancet March 25, 2000;355:1073-1075.
COMMENT: Energy medicine is clearly the medicine of the future. It is great
to see that some of these novel techniques are being validated in respectable
good journals.
Seizure Research Studies
http://www.pslgroup.com/dg/16596e.htm
BOCA RATON, FL -- February 17, 2000 -- Jacobson Resonance Enterprises,
Inc. reported the results of a double blind, pilot clinical study in epilepsy
conducted at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center by principal
investigator Kalarickal Oommen, M.D., director of epilepsy research and
nationally recognized authority in the treatment and research of epilepsy
seizures. The data indicated that treatment with the Jacobson Resonator,
utilizing low-intensity and low-frequency magnetic fields, decreased seizure
frequency in some patients with intractable partial complex epilepsy
significantly and that this modality may be a useful adjunctive treatment in
these patients and others. Intractable partial complex epilepsy patients were
enrolled in a pilot medical study in a non-randomized and double blind fashion.
In the first phase of seven weeks, each patient received either magnetic
treatment or no treatment for 40 minutes per treatment per week. In the second
phase of seven weeks, the order was reversed for patients receiving no
treatment or magnetic field treatment. It was found that 66 percent of the
patients had a mean decrease in seizure frequency of 33 percent plus during the
study.
Dr. Kalarickal Oommen stated, "The results are very encouraging when you
compare it to the way anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) are approved by the FDA.
The percentages for some of the recently marketed AEDs and the Vagus Nerve
Stimulator were in the 17-25 percent range or under. I believe this is great
news, particularly when you consider that patients were only treated once a
week and noninvasively." Dr. Jerry Jacobson, Chairman and CEO, stated, "The
follow-up study will be double blinded and contain a greater population of
patients who will be treated three times per week instead of only once a week.
We are hopeful that the seizure reduction level will thus rise to 50 percent. We
are moving quickly with I.R.B. approval for our next phase of the clinical trial
and hope to request to the FDA 'expedited review' for approval next year.
Other Research Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#121
This article reports on the cases of three patients with partial seizures who
received treatment with external artificial magnetic fields of low intensity. Such
treatment led to a significant attenuation of seizure frequency over a 10-14-
month period.121 Experimental results indicated that the administration of
modulated electromagnetic fields of 2-30 Hz suppressed epilepsy in rats.122
This review article cites one study in particular in which results showed that
pretreatment with 30 minutes of exposure to a 75-mT pole strength, DC-
powered magnetic field significantly prevented experimentally induced seizures
in mice.123 This double-blind, placebo-controlled study examined the effects of
2-hour exposure to weak magnetic fields (0.2-0.7 G, irregularly oscillating
0.026-0.067 Hz) produced 3 pairs of orthogonal Helmholtz coils on pain
perception in healthy subjects. Results showed that magnetic treatment
significantly reduced the perception of pain.124 This article reports on the case
of a severe epileptic who experienced a significant lessening of behavior
disturbances and seizure frequency following treatment with low-frequency,
external artificial magnetic fields.125 Low-frequency, external artificial
magnetic field treatment was shown to significantly reduce seizures in four
adult epileptic cases.126
References
121. P.A. Anninos, et al., "Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Partial
Seizures," International Journal of Neurosci, 60(3-4), October 1991, p. 141-171.
122. G.D. Antimonii & R.A. Salamov, "Action of a Modulated Electromagnetic
Field on Experimentally Induced Epileptiform Brain Activity in Rats," Biull
Eksp Biol Med, 89(2), February 1980, p. 145-148.
123. M.J. McLean, et al., "Therapeutic Efficacy of a Static Magnetic Device in
Three Animal Seizure Models: Summary of Experience," Second World
Congress for Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine, 8-13 June
1997, Bologna, Italy.
124. F. Sartucci, et al., "Human Exposure to Oscillating Magnetic Fields
Produces Changes in Pain Perception and Pain-Related Somatosensory Evoked
Potentials," Second World Congress for Electricity and Magnetism in Biology
and Medicine, 8-13 June 1997, Bologna, Italy.
125. R. Sandyk & P.A. Anninos, "Attenuation of Epilepsy with Application of
External Magnetic Fields: A Case Report," International Journal of Neurosci,
66(1-2), September 1992, p. 75-85.
126. R. Sandyk & P.A. Anninos, "Magnetic Fields Alter the Circadian
Periodicity of Seizures," International Journal of Neurosci, 63(3-4), April 1992,
p. 265-274.
Sexual Disorders Research Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
Results of this placebo-controlled study showed that magnetotherapy exhibited
beneficial effects with respect to cavernous blood flow in male patients
suffering from sexual problems.280 This study examined the effects of a
combination pulsing magnetic field (PMF)/vacuum therapy in the treatment of
impotence. Vacuum therapy consisted of the penis being placed into a hermetic
cylinder with a negative pressure of 180-260 mmHg for 10-12 minutes per
exposure for a total of 12-15 exposures. PMF therapy consisted of the same
length and number of exposures, with 6 Hz, 30 mT being applied to the penile
area at the same time as vacuum therapy. Results showed that, following the
combination therapy, sexual function was restored in about 71 percent of
patients, was improved in 17 percent, and did not change in 17 percent. For
those patients receiving vacuum therapy only, the numbers were 51, 24, and 24
percent, respectively.281 This double-blind, placebo-controlled study examined
the effects of weak magnetic fields in men suffering from various sexual
disorders, including decreased erection and premature ejaculation. The three
different magnetic stimulators used included the "Biopotenzor," "Eros," and
"Bioskan-1" devices. All patients wore one of the three devices for a 3-week
period. Results showed full restoration of sexual function in 38 percent of
patients in the Biopotenzor group, 31 percent in the Eros group, 36 percent in
the Bioskan-1 group, and in just 15 percent of the controls. Improvements in
sexual function were seen among 42 percent, 39 percent, 47 percent, and 18
percent, respectively.282
References
280. I.I. Gorpinchenko, "The Use of Magnetic Devices in Treating Sexual
Disorders in Men," Lik Sprava, (3-4), March-April 1995, p 95-97.
281. I.V. Karpukhin & V.A. Bogomol'nii, "Local Vacuum-Magnetotherapy of
Impotency Patients," Vopr Kurortol Lech Fiz Kult, (2) 1996, p. 38-40.
282. I.I. Gorpinchenko, "The Use of Magnetic Devices in Treating Sexual
Disorders in Men," Lik Sprava, (3-4), 1995, p. 95-97.
Skin Research Studies
http://www.cogreslab.demon.co.uk/Magnetsmed.htm
Some of our most common ailments today include skin diseases such as
psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, eczema, and pruritis. These all have their origin in
immune dysfunction, and fall therefore under immediate suspicion as being
"modern" disorders of environmental origin. Among the more remarkable
magnetic field studies 50Hz magnetic fields for 28 days achieved complete
freedom from symptoms in 30 of 50 sufferers and 15 marked improvements
(Tretyakova, 1985). In a study of 16 microbial eczemas, 6 neurodermatitis
cases, and 15 crural ulcers, Zaerko in 1988 reported improvement in 13 of the
eczema cases following 10 hours exposure to 350 gauss static magnetic fields
over 10-20 sessions. 13 of the crural ulcers also improved. Granulation of tissue
was also reported and epithelialisation, as well as decreased oedema in 5 of 7
patients with crural ulcers in a study by Sieron (1989).
Sleep Disorders Research Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
Results of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study indicated that low-
energy-emission therapy significantly improved sleeping patterns among
patients suffering from chronic psychophysiological insomnia. Therapy was
administered 3 times per week, always in late afternoon and for 20 minutes,
over a period of 4 weeks.284 This double-blind, placebo-controlled study
examined the effects of low-energy emission therapy (27 MHz amplitude-
modulated electromagnetic fields) in patients suffering from insomnia.
Treatment consisted of 3 exposures per week over a 4-week period. Results
showed significant increases in total sleep time among patients in the treatment
group relative to controls.285 This review article notes that studies have found
low-energy emission therapy to be effective in the treatment of chronic
insomnia, and suggests that it may also be of value for patients suffering from
generalized anxiety disorders.286
References
283. T.U. Gorgiladze & B.M. Kogan, "A New Method of Treatment of a Dry
Kerato-Conjunctivitis in Sjogren's Syndrome," Oftalmol Zh, (1), 1996, p.38-40.
284. R. Hajdukovic, et al., "Effects of Low Energy Emission Therapy (LEET)
on Sleep Structure," First World Congress for Electricity and Magnetism in
Biology and Medicine, 14-19 June 1992, Lake Buena Vista, FL, p. 92. 285. M.
Erman, et al., "Low-Energy Emission Therapy (LEET) Treatment for
Insomnia," Bioelectromagnetics Society, 13th Annual Meeting, 23-27 June
1991, Salt Lake City, UT, p. 69. 286. C. Guilleminault & B. Pasche, "Clinical
Effects of Low Energy Emission Therapy," Bioelectromagnetics Society, 15th
Annual Meeting, 13-17 June 1993, Los Angeles, CA, p. 84.
Spinal Cord Injury Research Studies
http://www.cogreslab.demon.co.uk/Magnetsmed.htm
In a study of 104 patients with spinal cord injuries Tchach, Abileva et al., in
1989 applied 400-700 gauss static magnets for an hour 1 to 3 times daily, and
reported marked functional improvement (bedridden: 83.5%; those in chairs
22% compared with only 4% among controls). There was not only a clinical
improvement, but the electromyogram (EMG) also improved with magnetic
treatment. Another early trial of 11 children with polyradiculoneuritis achieved
complete healing in 7 of them using 28-gauss magnets applied in
10 sessions of 10-15 minutes (Deyanova, 1976).
--------------------------------------------------------
Magnetic Treatment and Spinal Cord Injuries
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/?newsid=8155 - 11 May 2004 A
preliminary study has shown for the first time that it may be possible to help
people who have suffered partial damage to their spinal cord by applying a
magnetic therapy to their brain. Writing in this month's Spinal Cord, a team of
UK doctors describe how patients with incomplete spinal cord injuries received
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), leading to improvements in
their ability to move muscles and limbs, and ability to feel sensations. rTMS
uses an electromagnet placed on the scalp to generate brief magnetic pulses,
about the strength of an MRI scan, which stimulate the part of the brain called
the cerebral cortex. Incomplete spinal cord injuries are a type of spinal injury
where the spinal cord has not been entirely severed, but the patient has still lost
the ability to move or feel properly below the injury point. Dr Nick Davey from
Imperial College London and Charing Cross Hospital, and one of the study's
authors, says: "Through rTMS we may be able to help people who have
suffered partial injuries to the spinal cord recover some of their movement and
feeling. We think it works by strengthening the information leaving the brain
through the undamaged neurons in the spinal cord. It may work like
physiotherapy but instead of repeating a physical task, the machine activates the
surviving nerves to strengthen their connections." The researchers from
Imperial College London, the National Spinal Injuries Centre, Stoke Mandeville
Hospital, UK, and Charing Cross Hospital, UK, tested rTMS on four patients
with incomplete spinal injuries. The patients had all sustained their injuries at
least 18 months previously and had already received conventional rehabilitation
including physiotherapy. They were all considered stable in that they were no
longer undergoing natural improvement. The patients received both real and
sham rTMS treatment over a three-week period. The rTMS treatment involved
five consecutive days of magnetic stimulation for one hour per day. They
noticed no difference between the baseline and the sham treatment, but found
that the rTMS treatment resulted in a 37.5 (+/– 8) percent drop in intracortical
inhibition, compared with normal physiotherapy. Weaker intracortical
inhibition makes it easier for messages from the brain to pass down the spinal
cord to the rest of the body. This reduction in intracortical inhibition was
accompanied by improvement in both motor and sensory function, which lasted
for at least three weeks after the treatment. Reduced intracortical inhibition also
occurs naturally and can facilitate functional recovery, and this is reflected in
improvements to the patients' ability to move and feel. rTMS was a treatment
designed to treat psychiatric disorders, and has been used in treating some of
the symptoms of schizophrenia. Dr Davey adds: "Despite this, we still need to
be extremely careful in interpreting these results as we only sampled a small
number of patients. Further studies on larger groups of patients will need to be
carried out before we will know if this treatment is fully effective. Similarly we
have no idea how long the treatment benefits will last over a longer period."
This work was supported by the International Spinal Research Trust, and Dr
Davey and his team have recently received a further grant, again from the
International Spinal Research Trust, to carry out further, larger trials.
Notes to editors:
1. Magnetic brain stimulation can improve clinical outcome in incomplete
spinal cord injured patients. Spinal Cord, May 2004. 2. Consistently rated in the
top three UK university institutions, Imperial College London is a world
leading science-based university whose reputation for excellence in teaching
and research attracts students (10,000) and staff (5,000) of the highest
international quality. Innovative research at the College explores the interface
between science, medicine, engineering and management and delivers practical
solutions that enhance the quality of life and the environment - underpinned by
a dynamic enterprise culture. Website: www.imperial.ac.uk.
Contact: Tony Stephenson
at.stephenson@imperial.ac.uk
44-207-594-6712
Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine
Stroke Research Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
Results of this study demonstrated that treatment with sinusoidal modulated
currents coupled with transcerebral magnetic fields proved more effective than
either therapy on its own in the treatment of stroke patients during the period of
early rehabilitation.290 This study found that exposure to pulsed
electromagnetic fields following focal cerebral ischemia provided significant
protection against neuronal damage, in rabbits.291 Results of this study pointed
to the efficacy of magnetic field therapy in the treatment of patients suffering
from a variety of conditions associated with different brain vascular
diseases.292
References
290. F.E. Gorbunov, et al., "The Effect of Combined Transcerebral Magnetic
and Electric Impulse Therapy on the Cerebral and Central Hemodynamic Status
of Stroke Patients in the Early Rehabilitation Period," Vopr Kurortol Fizioter
Lech Fiz Kult, (3), May-June 1996, p. 21-24.
291. G. Grant, et al., "Protection Against Focal Cerebral Ischemia Following
Exposure to a Pulsed Electromagnetic Field," Bioelectromagnetics, 15(3), 1994,
p. 205-216.
292. N.Y. Gilinskaia, "Magnetic Fields in Treatment of Vascular Diseases of
the Brain," Magnitologiia, 1, 1991, p. 13-17.
Surgery Research Studies
Double-blind study published in the December issue of the Journal of Plastic
and Reconstructive Surgery studied 20 patients recuperating from liposuction of
excess body fat, or "love handles." In the research by Dr. Daniel Man, a board-
certified plastic surgeon in Boca Raton, Fla., 10 patients wore magnetic pads on
their wounds; 10 others had sham magnets in the pads. Those who got the
magnetic pads had less pain in the first week, less first three days than did the
control group.
Tendonitis Research Studies
PEER-REVIEWED SCIENTIFIC STUDY
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
Results of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study indicated that pulsed
electromagnetic field therapy exhibited significant beneficial effects in the
treatment of patients suffering from persistent rotator cuff tendonitis.294 This
double-blind, placebo-controlled study examined the effects of a magnetic
treatment device taped over the carpal tunnel against wrist pain sustained at
work among a group of turkey plant employees. Results showed that the device
was effective in alleviating such pain and that it was free of side effects.323
REFERENCES
294. A. Binder, et al., "Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy of Persistent
Rotator Cuff Tendinitis. A Doubleblind Controlled Assessment," Lancet,
1(8379), March 31, 1984, p. 695-698.
323. M.J. McLean, et al., "Treatment of Wrist Pain in the Work Place with a
Static Magnetic Device – Interim Report of a Clinical Trial," Second World
Congress for Electricity and Magnetism in Biology and Medicine, June 8-13,
Bologna, Italy.
Tourette's SyndromeResearch Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This article reports on the case of a 6-year-old boy suffering from Tourette's
syndrome who experienced improvements in visuoconstructional and
visuomotor skills, along with more general symptomatic improvements,
following the extracranial application of electromagnetic fields in the picotesla
range of intensity.295
References
295. R. Sandyk, "Improvement of Right Hemispheric Functions in a Child with
Gilles de la Tourette's Syndrome Weak Electromagnetic Fields," International
Journal of Neurosci, 81(3-4), April 1995, p. 199-213.
Tuberculosis Research Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This study examined the efficacy of millimeter waves combined with
conventional drug treatment in patients suffering from tuberculosis. MW
therapy consisted of 10 exposures of the thymus area for 60 minutes per day
using a "Yavor" apparatus (6.4 or 7.1 mm wavelength). Controls received drug
treatment only. Results indicated that while MW/drug therapy had no effect on
the clearance of the tuberculosis bacteria, it did facilitate clinical recovery faster
than drug therapy alone.296 This study examined the effects of extremely-high-
frequency therapy as administered via a "Yav'-1-7,1" apparatus (7.1 mm
wavelength) on tuberculosis patients. Results showed a 25-percent
improvement in patients receiving the therapy as a pathogenic treatment. A 72-
percent improvement rate was seen among patients who received the therapy as
treatment for concurrent diseases.297 This controlled study examined the
effects of constant elastic electromagnetic fields (40mT) in patients suffering
from pulmonary tuberculosis. Therapy consisted of 30-45 minute daily
application of either a single magnet or a pair of magnets placed on the chest at
an area high in skin temperature over a 1-3 month period. When coupled with
conventional treatments, one third of patients receiving the constant
electromagnetic fields experienced healing of tubercular cavities. contrast, only
one fifth of patients receiving conventional treatment alone experienced such
effects. One month into combination treatment, there was no evidence of
mycobacterium tuberculosis in the sputum in half the patients relative to only
one third of controls.298
References
296. A. Khomenko, et al., "Use of Millimeter-Range Electromagnetic Radiation
in Complex Therapy for Pulmonary Tuberculosis," Millimetrovie Volni v
Biologii I Meditcine, (3), 1994, p. 53-61.
297. T.V. Kalinina & V.D. Churaev, "Expense with the Use of the EHF-
Therapy at Ryasan' Regional Clinical TB Dispensary," Millimetrovie Volni v
Biologii i Meditcine, (4), 1994, p. 52-53.
298. A.S. Solov'ena, et al., "Use of Constant Magnetic Field for Increasing the
Effectiveness of Chemotherapy in Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis,"
Probl Tuberk, 8, 1987, p. 53-56.
Ulcers Research Studies (Gastric and Duodenal)
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
Results of this study showed that the administration of millimetric
electromagnetic waves helped to normalize blood properties, subsequently
improving the effectiveness of more conventional gastric and duodenal ulcer
treatment.303
This study examined the effects of millimeter wave (MW) therapy in 317
patients suffering from duodenal and gastric ulcers. MW therapy consisted of
30 minutes per day exposure of the epigastric area ("Yav'-1" apparatus, 10
mW/cm2, 5.6-mm wavelength) until complete ulcer cicatrization was achieved.
Results showed a 95-percent rate of ulcer cicatrization in patients receiving the
treatment compared to a 78-percent rate in controls. One year follow up showed
a 54-percent ulcer recurrence rate in MW-treated patients, which was markedly
less than the rate for controls.306 This controlled study found extremely-high-
frequency therapy to be an effective treatment in patients suffering from
duodenal ulcers. Treatment consisted of 5-10 exposures, lasting 20-30 minutes,
and making use of the G4-142 apparatus (53.5-70.0 GHz frequency range).308
This study compared the effects of traditional drug treatment (TDT) to those of
microwave resonance therapy (MRT) in patients suffering from duodenal
ulcers. Results indicated the mean hospital stay for patients in the TDT group
was approximately 22 days. Throughout this period, ulcers healed in 38 percent
of patients, were reduced in 17 percent, showed no change in 43 percent, and
increased in 2 percent. No pain relief was seen in 32 percent. contrast, mean
discharge time for patients in the MRT group was approximately 12 days. Pain
was generally stopped in 3-6 days. Complete healing occurred in 81 percent, a
decrease was seen in 16 percent, and ulcer size did not change in just 3 percent.
Remission occurred in 98 percent of such patients.310 In this study, microwave
resonance therapy (MRT) was administered to 2642 patients suffering from
duodenal ulcers and to 78 with gastric ulcers. Treatment involved the use of a
G4-142 device (53.6-78.3 GHz, less than 2 mW/cm2 incident power) as well as
"Electronika-KVCh" and "Porog-1" devices. Patients received 6-12 daily
exposures of between 20 and 25 minutes. Results showed a total ulcer
cicatrization in 80 percent of patients, and arrested pain syndrome in almost 100
percent.311
References
303. M.V. Poslavskii, et al., "Treatment of Peptic Ulcer Electromagnetic
Irradiation of the Millimetric Range," Sov Med, (1), 1989, p. 29-31. 306. M.V.
Poslavsky, et al., "Experience with Application of Millimeter-Range Radiation
for Treatment and Prophylaxis of Stomach and Duodenal Ulcer," Vopr Kurortol
Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult, (4), 1989, p. 31-36.
308. M.V. Teppone, et al., "Extremely-High Frequency Therapy of Duodenal
Ulcer," Klin Med, 69(10), 1991, p. 74-77.
310. S.S. Dudka, et al., "A Comparative Assessment of the Efficacy of Drug
Therapy and Microwave Resonance Therapy for Ulcerative Disease of the
Duodenum," Fundamental and Applied Aspects of the Use of Millimeter
Electromagnetic Radiation in Medicine. Abstracts of the 1st All-Union
Symposium with International Participation, May 10-13, 1989, Kiev, Ukraine,
p. 195-197.
311. V.A. Kutzenok, "Microwave Resonance Therapy of Stomach and
Duodenal Ulcers," Fundamental and Applied Aspects of the Use of Millimeter
Electromagnetic Radiation in Medicine. Abstracts of the 1st All-Union
Symposium with International Participation, May 10-13, 1989, Kiev, Ukraine,
p. 192-193.
Ulcers Research Studies (Trophic)
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
This study examined the use of magnetotherapy coupled with galvanization and
intratissue electrophoresis in 86 patients suffering from trophic ulcers. A
"Potok-1" apparatus with a density of current equal to 0.05-0.1 mA/cm2 was
used to create an electrical field. The "MAG-30" apparatus for low-frequency
magnetotherapy with induction of 30 mT and area of exposure of 20 cm2 was
applied to a trophic ulcer site at the same time. Results led the authors to
conclude that magnetogalvanotherapy is the recommended treatment for trophic
ulcers of the lower extremities.299 This review article discusses the theoretical
and clinical applications of magnetic field therapy in the treatment of trophic
ulcers of the lower limbs.300 This study looked at the effects of conventional
trophic ulcer treatment alone and in combination with alternating magnetic field
(AMF) or constant magnetic field (CMF) exposures in a group of patients
suffering from various types of trophic ulcers of the lower limbs. Results
showed an average hospital stay of 31 days in the CMF group and 27 days in
the AMF group, compared to 40 days among controls. Based on these and
related findings, the authors suggest combination AMF therapy to be most
effective.304 This placebo-controlled study examined the effects of pulsed
electromagnetic fields in the treatment of decubitus ulcers in hospitalized
elderly patients with stage II and III pressure ulcers. Patients received daily
PEMF stimulation in conjunction with conventional treatment for a period of up
to 5 weeks. The findings were that combined PEMF/conventional treatment was
superior to conventional treatment and to the placebo received controls.305
Results of this study found that the daily use of electromagnetolaser therapy
decreased mean healing time in patients suffering from lower extremity trophic
ulcers to approximately 18 days, compared with approximately 26 days in
patients receiving laser therapy alone.307 This double-blind, placebo-controlled
study found that treatment with nonthermal pulsed electromagnetic energy
(PEMET) accelerated would healing in spinal cord injury patients suffering
from stage II and III pressure ulcers. PEMET treatment consisted of pulsed
27.12-MHz energy produced via a Diapulse device. Energy was delivered the
use of a treatment head placed in wound dressings, in 30-minute periods twice a
day for 12 weeks or until sores healed.312 This double-blind, placebo-
controlled study examined the effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields (75 Hz,
2.7 mT) applied 4 hours per day for a maximum of 3 months coupled with
conventional therapies in patients suffering from trophic lesions. Results
showed the treatment to have positive effects, but only on small lesions.314
References
299. A.V. Alekseenko, et al., "Use of Magnetic Therapy Combined with
Galvanization and Tissue Electrophoresis in the Treatment of Trophic Ulcers,"
Klin Khir, (7-8), 1993, p. 31-34.
300. A. Sieron, et al., "Use of Magnetic Field in Treatment of Trophic Leg
Ulcers," Pol Tyg Lek, 46(37-39), September 1991, p. 717- 719.
304. I.G. Sukhotnik, "Comparative Effectiveness of Using Constant and
Alternating Magnetic Fields in the Treatment of Trophic Ulcers," Vest Khir,
144(6), 1990, p. 123-124.
305. S. Comorosan, et al., "The Effect of Diapulse Therapy on the Healing of
Decubitus Ulcer," Romanian Journal of Physiol, 30(1- 2), 1993, p. 41-45.
307. F.V. Galimzianov, "Laser and Electromagnetolaser Therapy for Trophic
Ulcers of the Lower Extremities in Chronic Venous
Insufficiency," Vestn Khir Im I I Grek, 152(5-6), 1994, p. 70-72.
312. C.A. Salzberg, et al., "The Effects of Non-Thermal Pulsed Electromagnetic
Energy on Wound Healing of Pressure Ulcers in Spinal Cord-Injured Patients:
A Randomized, Double-Blind Study," Wounds: A Compendium of Clinical
Research and Practice, 7(1), 1995, p. 11-16.
314. M. Jeran, et al., "PEMF Stimulation of Skin Ulcers of Venous Origin in
Humans: Preliminary Report of a Double Blind Study," Journal of Bioelectr,
6(2), 1987, p. 181-188.
Urinary Problems Research Studies
http://www.garynull.com/Documents/magnets.htm#PEER-REVIEWED
SCIENTIFIC STUDIES
In this article, the authors report on their successful use of magnetic-laser
therapy in inflammations of the urinary system in a urological clinic setting.316
Results of this study showed magnetolaser therapy to be effective in the
treatment of patients suffering from urolithiasis (stone formation). Magnetolaser
therapy involved the use of a Milita device with a 35-mT magnetic field.317
References
316. O.B. Loran, et al., "Magnetic-laser Therapy in Inflammatory and
Posttraumatic Lesions of the Urinary System," Urol Nefrol (Mosk), (5),
September-October 1996, p. 10-14.
317. V.P. Avdoshin, et al., "Assessment of Magnetolaser Therapy in
Comparison with Other Methods of Treatment of Patients with Urolithiasis,"
Fiz Med, 4(1-2), 1994, p. 102-103.
Static Magnetic Field Therapy for Symptomatic Diabetic
Neuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind,
Placebo-Controlled Trial
Michael I. Weintraub, MD, FACP, FAAN, Gil I. Wolfe, MD, Richard A.
Barohn, MD, Steven P. Cole, PhD,
Gareth J. Parry, MD, Ghazala Hayat, MD, Jeffrey A. Cohen, MD, Jeffrey C.
Page, DPM,
Mark B. Bromberg, MD, Sherwyn L. Schwartz, MD, and the Magnetic
Research Group
ABSTRACT. Weintraub MI, Wolfe GI, Barohn RA, Cole SP, Parry GJ, Hayat
G, Cohen JA, Page JC, Bromberg MB, Schwartz SL, and the Magnetic
Research Group. Static magnetic field therapy for symptomatic diabetic
neuropathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Phys
Med Rehabil 2003;84:736-46.
Objective: To determine if constant wearing of multipolar, static magnetic
450G) shoe insoles can reduce neuropathic pain and quality of life (QOL)
scores in symptomatic diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).
Design: Randomized, placebo-control, parallel study.
Setting: Forty-eight centers in 27 states.
Participants: Three hundred seventy-five subjects with DPN stage II or III
were randomly assigned to wear constantly magnetized insoles for 4 months;
the placebo group wore similar, unmagnetized device.
Intervention: Nerve conduction and/or quantified sensory testing were
performed serially.
Main Outcome Measures: Daily visual analog scale scores for numbness or
tingling and burning and QOL issues were tabulated over 4 months. Secondary
measures included nerve conduction changes, role of placebo, and safety issues.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA), analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), and chi-
square analysis were performed. Results: There were statistically significant
reductions during the third and fourth months in burning (mean change for
magnet treatment, _12%; for sham, _3%; P_.05, ANCOVA), numbness and
tingling (magnet, _10%; sham, _1%; P_.05, ANCOVA), and exercise-induced
foot pain (magnet, _12%; sham, _4%; P_.05, ANCOVA). For a subset of
patients with baseline severe pain, statistically significant reductions occurred
from baseline through the fourth month in numbness and tingling (magnet,
_32%; sham, _14%; P_.01, ANOVA) and foot pain (magnet, _41%; sham,
_21%; P_.01, ANOVA).
Conclusions: Static magnetic fields can penetrate up to 20mm and appear to
target the ectopic firing nociceptors in the epidermis and dermis. Analgesic
benefits were achieved over time.
Key Words: Diabetic neuropathies; Magnetics; Rehabilitation.
© 2003 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the
American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
DIABETIC PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY (DPN) is a common and often
disabling complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). Depending on criteria, DPN
is estimated to occur in 50% to 90% of individuals with diabetes for more than
10 years.1-4 As many as half of the 16 million diabetics in the United States
will experience neuropathic pain at some point in their lives.5-9 DPN begins
insidiously, presenting as a symmetrical sensory polyneuropathy that follows a
stocking-glove pattern. Selective involvement of unmyelinated C fibers and
small myelinated A delta fibers produces pain of the burning dysesthetic type
and is often accompanied by hyperalgesia and allodynia in the feet.7,10-12
Neuropathic pain symptoms fluctuate and can be described as superficial, deep,
aching, lancinating, constant, or episodic. Complaints are often worse at night.
Although initial symptoms and the course of DPN vary, once neuropathic pain
is established, it is almost always progressive, leading to increased discomfort
and disability.6,13-15 Furthermore, individuals with DPN are at augmented risk
for foot trauma and infections that may necessitate amputative procedures. 2,16
From a pathophysiologic standpoint, these symptoms are believed to be
secondary to ectopic firing of nociceptive afferent axons that are undergoing
degeneration.7,9-12 This ectopic depolarization appears to be related to
dysregulated expression of sodium and calcium channels17-19 and a deficit in
the potassium- internal rectifying channel.20-22 Neurons at the level of the
dorsal root ganglion (DRG) also become hyperexcitable after peripheral nerve
injury, presumably because of loss of peripheral inhibitory influences.23
Currently, there are no treatments that reverse or arrest progressive diabetic
polyneuropathy.24 A variety of standard oral therapies used for symptomatic
Neuropathic pain include tricyclic antidepressants,25 antiepileptic
medications,26 and narcotic analgesics.27,28 Additionally, topical products
such as capsaicin29,30 have been applied and have produced incomplete pain
relief and significant side effects. Overall, the results have been disappointing
and associated with significant side effects.15,31,32 The search for reliable,
safe, and effective mainstream treatments for the neuropathic pain of DPN
remains a major challenge,13,15,25-27,31-34 and, not surprisingly, patients
have explored a variety of alternative approaches, including homeopathy,
acupuncture, and magnetic From the Department of Neurology, New York
Medical College, Valhalla, NY (Weintraub); University of Texas, Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, TX (Wolfe, Barohn); Research Design Inc, Yorktown
Heights, NY (Cole); University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN (Parry); St.
Louis University, St. Louis, MO (Hayat); Kaiser- Permanente Medical Group,
Denver, CO (Cohen); California College of Podiatric Medicine, San Francisco,
CA (Page); University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (Bromberg); and Diabetes
and Glandular Disease Clinic, San Antonio, TX (Schwartz). Supported by Nu-
Magnetics Inc and Nikken Inc. Presented in part at the Joint Conference of the
American Congress of Rehabilitation
Medicine and the American Society of Neurorehabilitation, October 5, 2002,
Philadelphia, PA.
No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the
research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or
upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.
Reprint requests to Michael I. Weintraub, MD, Dept of Neurology and
Medicine, New York Medical College, 325 S Highland Ave, Briarcliff Manor,
NY 10510,
e-mail: miwneuro@pol.net.
0003-9993/03/8405-7836$30.00/0
doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00106-0
Arch Phys Med Rehabil Vol 84, May 2003