Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Average Corrosion
I Solution
Temperature
“C
Duration of
Test (Days) 702
RaWTpy)
705
32% HCI 30 91 0.03 0.03
10% HCI + 100 ppm FeCI, 30 91 0.9 0.7
32% HCI + 5 ppm FeCI, 30 91
32% HCI + 50 ppm FeCI, 30 91
32% HCI + 100 ppm FeCI, 30 91
6
Applications Of Current applications of zirconium made of zirconium are used by
equipment in hydrochloric acid in- chemical companies in the produc-
b Zirconium In clude pumps, valves, piping, con- tion of polymers. Other hydrochloric
applications where zirconium has
Hydrochloric Acid
densers, and evaporators. Zirconium
heat exchangers, pumps, and been used are phthalic-hydrochloric
agitators have been used for over 20 acid and wet hydrogen chloride-
years in an azo dye coupling reaction. chlorine atmospheres. A very impor-
Besides being very corrosion resis- tant application for zirconium is in
tant in this environment, zirconium processes that cycle between
does not plate out undesirable salts hydrochloric or sulfuric acid and
which would change the color and alkaline solutions.
stability of the dyes. Heat exchangers
temperatures well above boiling and the welds and heat-affected zones
at acid concentrations up to 70%. (HAZ) were found to be much more
Figure 2 shows the isocorrosion susceptible to corrosion attack than
curves of zirconium in H,SO, soiu- the base metal. This corrosion attack
tions. Upon exposure to sulfuric acid, in the welds and HAZ in Zircadyne
a film is formed on the zirconium sur- 702 and Zircadyne 704 occurs in the
face which is resistant to further alpha phase grain boundaries except
attack by the acid. in the area of the prior beta grain
Tests conducted in our corrosion boundaries which are not attacked.
laboratory have shown that welded Heat-treating the weldments at the
and non-welded coupons of Zir- stress-relieving temperatures of
cadyne alloys are about equally cor- 500 “C to 600 “C does not significantly
rosion resistant in lower concentra- improve their corrosion resistance.
tions. These corrosion data, collected However, heat treatment of
for three grades of Zircadyne zir- weldments in the temperature range
conium (702, 704 and 705) are of 630°C to 788°C does improve the
illustrated in the isocorrosion corrosion resistance. The optimum
diagrams shown in Figures 3-5. The heat treatment for improving Zir-
diagrams are separated into areas of cadyne 702’s corrosion resistance
acid temperature and concentration was determined by experimentation
with the expected corrosion rates to be % to 1 hour at 730-788°C
shown within each area outlined by a (1400 f 50°F). Lower-temperature
solid line. The dashed lines separate heat treatments down to 630°C can
the graph into two regions, where at be used to balance the improvements
lower concentrations the weld would in corrosion resistance, strength, and
be expected to behave similarly to the fabricability.
non-welded metal, and where at In welded coupons of Zircadyne
higher concentrations the welds 705, intragranular attack of both the
would be preferentially attacked. weld and HAZ was observed in 65%
Comparing Figures 3-5, the Zir- sulfuric acid. Annealing the
cadyne 702 and Zircadyne 704 are zirconium-welded coupons between
approximately equivalent in their 550°C and 1000°C greatly improves
resistance to sulfuric acid, and both the corrosion resistance of the weld
are more resistant to sulfuric acid in 65% H&O,. For the lower end of
than Zircadyne 705. It is important to this temperature range, a heating
note that the data are representative time of two hours is recommended.
of a pure acid system, and the Half an hour is sufficient at 1000°C.
presence of oxidizing halide con- Lower temperatures are normally used
taminants can accelerate the rate of (550-600 “C) to minimize dimensional
attack. changes caused by oxide film growth.
At temperatures above 200°C and For details, call TWCA.
‘continued on page 8.
Sulfuric Acid*
I
500
450
50 -
260
60
1
220
6(
2(
a
Effect of Impurities From studies on oxidizing
imourities in H.SO,. it was found that
with 1% additions of cupric or ferric
ions. Chloride ions were found to
feiric, cupric, 2nd nitrate ion have no effect on the corrosion-
impurities in H,SO, affect the corro- resistant properties of zirconium in
sion resistance properties of zir- sulfuric acid.
conium and its alloys at concentra- Zirconium can tolerate only very
tions above 65% H&O,. This is small amounts of fluoride ions in
shown by the isocorrosion curves in H,SO, even at low-acid concentra-
Figures 6 and 7. For example, 200 tions. At concentrations greater than
ppm cupric ions reduce the 0.125 50% H&30,, the corrosion rate will be
mm/y (5 mpy) isocorrosion curve by high even with 1 ppm fluoride ions.
less than 5 weight percent acid. In Figures 8 and 9 show the effect of the
less than 65% H,SO,, 200 ppm fluoride ion in sulfuric acid.
impurity levels of these ions for Therefore, fluoride ions have to be
Zircadyne grades 702 and 704, and complexed, using inhibitors such as
60% H,SO, for grade 705, have no zirconium sponge and phosphorous
effect on their corrosion resistance. pent-oxide, when zirconium equip-
In fact below 65%, grade 702 did not ment is used to handle fluoride ion-
experience accelerated attack even contaminated H,SO, solutions.
FIGURE 8. Effect of
fluoride ions in boiling
HA04 on the corrosion
rate of Zircadyne 702.
FIGURE 9. Effect of
fluoride ions in boiling
H&i04 on the 0.125 mm/y
and 1.25 mm/y corrosion
lines for Zircadyne 702.
Figure 8 Figure 9
Applications Of Zirconium is used extensively
40-70 weight percent sulfuric acid at
in carbon disulfide. Zirconium has been
used in these applications for over
Zirconium In elevated temperatures. Zirconium ten years without corrosion problems. 4
26OC -I
10
Nitric Acid pitting in zirconium.
showed that zirconium
Test results
did not cor-
amounts of Fe3 +, Cr3+ and Cr6+. Non-
welded and welded coupons were
v (Continued from Page 10)
rode or pit in boiling 30% to 70% tested in 30%, 50% and 70% HNO,
HNO, with up to 1% Fe&. Similarly, with 1% Fe or 1.45% stainless steel
the presence of up to 1% seawater or at boiling temperatures, and in 65%
1 % NaCl did not degrade zirconium’s HNO, with 1% Fe or 1.45% stainless
corrosion resistance to aqueous steel at 204°C. Test results indicated
HNO,. However, welded specimens that the presence of heavy-metal ions
could exhibit minor pitting in HNO, had little effect on the corrosion
vapors if a sufficient amount of resistance of zirconium.
chloride (e.g., 1% NaCl but not 1% The presence of fluoride ions in
seawater) was present in solutions. acidic solutions can significantly
This corrosion problem can be increase the corrosion rate of zir-
attributed to the chlorine gas conium. In mixtures of HNO, and HF,
generated upon the addition of NaCl the corrosion rate of zirconium is
into HNO,. It is suggested that areas directly proportional to the HF con-
that can accumulate chlorine gas be centration. In one-day tests, the cor-
avoided for zirconium equipment rosion rates of zirconium in 30%,
when chlorides are present in HNO,. 50% and 70% containing 10 ppm F-
Iron-or stainless-steel (Type 304)- (as HF) at 80°C were determined to
containing HNO, solutions were be 0.20, 0.31 and 0.62 mm/y, respec-
prepared, first, by dissolving iron or tively. Again, the corrosion of zir-
stainless steel in 70% HNO, at 204 “C conium in HNO, - F- solutions can be
using an autoclave. Under these con- controlled by adding an inhibitor to
ditions, corrosion rates of iron and convert fluoride ions into noncor-
stainless steel were estimated to be rosive complex ions. Zirconium
greater than 25.4 mm/y. Thirty per- sponge, zirconium powder, zirconium
cent to 70% HNO, solutions with 1% compounds (such as zirconium
Fe or 1.45% stainless steel were nitrate), and phosphorous pentoxide
prepared from the master solution. can be used as inhibitors.
These solutions contained varying
11
Natural And Zirconium has excellent corrosion
resistance to seawater, fresh water,
heat exchangers, condensers, and
other equipment used in these media.
Polluted Waters polluted water, and brackish water,
which makes it a natural choice for
Zircadyne alloys are replacing Ti-
Pd alloys in this type of service.
_I
12
Types Of Corrosion
Table 1
Galvanic Series In Seawater
Cathodic
(Most Noble) Platinum
Gold
Graphite
Titanium
Silver
Zirconium
Type 316, 317 Stainless Steel (passive)
Type 304 Stainless Steel (passive)
Type 410 Stainless Steel (passive)
Nickel (passive)
Silver Solder
Cupro Nickels (70-30)
Bronzes
Copper
Brasses
Nickel (active)
Naval Brass
Tin
Lead
Type 316, 317 Stainless Steels (active)
Type 304 Stainless Steel (active)
Cast Iron
Steel or Iron
Aluminum 2024
Cadmium
Aluminum (commercially pure)
Anodic Zinc
(Active) Magnesium and Magnesium Alloys
13
Pitting Corrosion Zirconium is quite resistant
pitting corrosion in chloride, bromide,
to becomes
potential,
greater than the pitting
pits will be initiated. Zir-
and iodide solutions. Electrochemical conium will also pit in perchlorate &
measurements, however, can reveal solutions if oxidizing impurities are
zirconium’s pitting tendency in these present. Nitrate and sulfate ions will
halide solutions. The reason zir- inhibit pitting of zirconium in certain
conium does not pit in most halide concentrations. TWCA laboratory per-
environments is that the corrosion sonnel will continue to generate new
potential is lower than the pitting data on the pitting corrosion of zir-
potential. The presence of oxidizing conium. For more detailed informa-
ions (such as Fe3+ or Cu’+) in halide tion on zirconium’s pitting behavior,
solutions will increase the corrosion contact TWCA’s Technical Services
potential and when the potential Department at (503) 926-4211.
14
Corrosion By High Zirconium’s resistance to air, hot
water, and steam makes it a logical
increased
temperature
resistance to high
water and steam. In
LL Temperature Water choice for power generation applica- comparison, the Zircadyne 705 alloy
tions. The metal can be exposed for with 2.5% columbium addition
And Steam prolonged periods in steam without possesses higher R.T. and elevated
pronounced attack below 425 “C. tensile strengths than Zircadyne 704
Zircadyne 704, a zirconium alloy and also exhibits good resistance in
containing 1.5% tin with small addi- steam applications.
tions of iron and chromium, shows an
15
Zirconium For In process heat transfer, the rate of
exchange of heat between the source
the tubing diameter, yielding higher
and constant film coefficients. Since
Heat Transfer and the receiver is critical. The zirconium is corrosion resistant, a
Applications
driving force is the temperature dif- corrosion allowance is seldom re- --y
ference across an impedance. This quired thus minimizing the actual wall
impedance consists of source and thickness and resistance to heat
receiver film coefficients, the transfer.
resistance due to a metal barrier and These factors all contribute to a
any scale which may have formed on stable, dependable heat transfer
this metal barrier. surface which allows equipment to
The actual design of a shell and operate for extended periods of time
tube heat exchanger, following in numerous media. Fouling problems
preliminary sizing, entails selections are often eliminated with a change to
of a suitable material of construction zirconium tubes.
and determination of the minimum Zirconium tubing is also available
allowable tubing wall thickness. The with a finned surface for increased
ideal corrosion-resistant material will heat transfer rates. Finned tube ex-
allow continuous operation without changers are typically much smaller
scale formation and accompanying than smooth tubed exchangers for
degradation of film coefficients. In- the same total heat transfer require-
creased flow rates are possible due ment.
to the dimensional stability present in
References
Zircadyne” 702
3
ti;
100 1 2120
0
$C
50 . , 1220 n> 50 mpy (.050” per yr.)
E
I- 25, . 77O
0 25 50 75 100 V Weight gain
Percent Concentration
4
ALCOHOL(ETHYL) ALCOHOL(METHYL) ALUM ALUMINUM
CHLORIDE CHLORATE
iiilsa
ALUMINUM ALUMINUM ALUMINUM AMMONIUM
FLUORIDE HYDROXIDE SULFATE BROMIDE
Elzi
DICHLOROACETIC DIMETHYL ETHER DIOXANE ETHYL ACETATE ETHYLENE
DICHLORIDE
3
Stress cracks
~
d
FERRIC CHLORIDE FERRIC SULFATE FERROUS CHLORIDE FERROUS SULFATE FLUOSILICICACID
HYDROCHLORIC +
SULFURIC ACID
lilzli
HYDROFLUORIC
ACID
YDROGEN PEROXIDE IODINE
(As KI)
i_ACilC/klD
~
SiLVER NITRATE SODIUM SODIUM BICARBONATE SODIUM CHLORIDE SODIUM FLUORIDE
5
Zirconium Corrosion Data
CONCENTRATION TEMPERATURE
CORROSIVE MEDIA REMARKS
Acetic Acid + 2% HI .
+ 200 ppm Cl-(Fe Cl,) 80 100 <l - <l
Acetic Acid + 2% HI
+ 1% CH, OH + 500 ppm 80 150 (1 (1
HCOOH
6
CORROSION RATE, mpy
CONCENTRATION TEMPERATURE
:ORROSIVE MEDIA % “C Zr 702 Zr 704 Zr 705 REMARKS
Acetic Acid + 2% HI
+ 200 ppm Cl- (NaCI) 80 100 <l - cl
7
CORROSION RATE, mpy
CONCENTRATION TEMPERATURE
CORROSIVE MEDIA O/O “C Zr 702 Zr 704 Zr 705 REMARKS
8
CORROSION RATE, mpy
CONCENTRATION TEMPERATURE
CORROSIVE MEDIA % “C Zr 702 Zr 704 Zr 705 REMARKS
10% HCI + 100 ppm FeCI, - 30 < 1 <2 < 1 SCC observed
9
CORROSION RATE, mpy
CONCENTRATION TEMPERATURE
CORROSIVE MEDIA % “C Zr 702 Zr 704 Zr 705 REMARKS
Hydroxyacetic Acid - 40 (5
10
CORROSION RATE, mpy
CONCENTRATION TEMPERATURE
CORROSIVE MEDIA % “C Zr 702 Zr 704 Zr 705 REMARKS
11
CORROSION RATE, mpy
CONCENTRATION TEMPERATURE
CORROSIVE MEDIA O/O “C Zr 702 Zr 704 Zr 705 REMARKS
Sodium Chloride Mixture 215 nil nil nil 25% NaCl + 0.5% Acetic
Acid + 1O/O
S + saturated
HS
I
12
CORROSION RATE, mpy
CONCENTRATION TEMPERATURE
CORROSIVE MEDIA O/O “C Zr 702 Zr 704 Zr 705 REMARKS
Sulfuric Acid
+ 1000 ppm Fe3- 60 Boiling (1 - B.P. = 138-142°C
+ 10,000 ppm Fe3- 60 Boiling <5 - Added as Fe,(SO,),
Sulfuric Acid
+ 200-l 000 ppm Fe3- 65 Boiling <5 - B.P. = 152-l 55°C
+ 10,000 ppm Fez- 65 Boiling 5-10 - Added as Fe,(SOJ,
Sulfuric Acid
+14ppm-141 ppmFe3- 70 Boiling 5-10 - - B.P. = 167-l 71 “C
+ 200 ppm 70 Boiling 10-20 - - Added as Fe,(S04),
+ 1410 ppm-10,000 ppm Fez- 70 Boiling >50
Sulfuric Acid
+ 1000 ppm FeCI, 60 Boiling (5 15 ~20 B.P. = 138-l 42°C
+ 10,000 ppm FeCI, 60 Boiling c.5 (20 20-50
+ 20,000 ppm FeCI, 60 Boiling 20-50 20-50 >50
13
CORROSION RATE, mpy
CONCENTRATION TEMPERATURE
CORROSIVE MEDIA O/O “C Zr 702 Zr 704 Zr 705 REMARKS
Sulfuric Acid
+ 200 ppm FeCI, 65 Boiling (5 <5 (20 B.P. = 152-l 55°C
+ 1000 ppm FeCI, 65 Boiling (5 <5 (20
+ 10,000 ppm FeCI, 65 Boiling (5 <5 <20
Sulfuric Acid
+ 10 ppm FeCI, 70 Boiling <20 <20 >50 3.P. = 167-l 71 “C
+ 100 ppm FeCI, 70 Boiling (20 <20 >50
+ 200 ppm FeCI, 70 Boiling (20 (20 >50
+ 1000 ppm FeCI, 70 Boiling <20 <20 >50
+ 10,000 ppm FeCI, 70 Boiling 20-50 >50 >50
Sulfuric Acid
+ 200 ppm cU*’ 60 Boiling <5 - Added as CuSO,
+ 1000-l 0,000 ppm Cu*+ 60 Boiling < 1
Sulfuric Acid
+ 200-l 0,000 ppm Cu2+ 65 Boiling <5 Added as CuS04
Sulfuric Acid
+ 3 ppm ClJ”’ 70 Boiling 5-10 Added as CuS04
+ 27-226 ppm Cu’+ 70 Boiling >50
Sulfuric Acid
+ 1000-l 0,000 ppm N03- 60 Boiling <5 Added as NaNOa
+ 50,000 ppm N03- 60 Boiling >50
Sulfuric Acid
+ 200-l 000 ppm NO,- 65 Boiling <5 Added as NaNO,
+ 10,000 ppm N03- 65 Boiling 1O-20
+ 50,000 ppm NOa- 65 Boiling >50 -
Sulfuric Acid
+ 200 ppm N03- 70 Boiling 5-10 Added as NaNO,
+ 6000 ppm NO,- 70 Boiling 20-50 -
Sulfuric Acid
+ 1000 ppm NO,- 60 Boiling <5 Added as HN03
+ 10,000 ppm N03- 60 Boiling 1O-20
+ 50,000 ppm N03- 60 Boiling >50
Sulfuric Acid
+ 1000 ppm NO,- 65 Boiling <5 Added as HN03
+ 1O,OOO-50,000 ppm NO,- 65 Boiling >50
14
CORROSION RATE, mpy
CONCENTRATION TEMPERATlJRE
CORROSIVE MEDIA O/O “C Zr 702 Zr 704 Zr 705 REMARKS
Sulfuric Acid (Cont.) Mixture Boiling-l 35 1 O-20 1 O-20 ~50 68% H,SO,, 1O/oHN03
Mixture Room >50 >50 ~50 75% HS04, 25% HN03
Mixture Boiling < 1 - - 7.5% HzSOzj, 19% HCI
Mixture Boiling < 1 - 34% H,SO,, 17% HCI
Mixture Boiling < 1 - - 40% H,SO,, 14% HCI
Mixture Boiling l-5 - 56% H,SO,, 10% HCI
Mixture Boiling < 1 - - 60% HS04, 1.5% HCI
Mixture Boiling <5 - - 69% H$SOd, 1.5% HCI
Mixture Boiling 10-20 - - 69% H,SO,, 4% HCI
Mixture Boiling (20 - - 72% HzS04, 1.5% HCI
Mixture Boiling >50 - >50 20% H2S04, 7% HCI with
50 ppm F impurities