THE EFFECTS OF GLOBALIZATION ON PROCUREMENT:

A CASE OF NAKUMATT HOLDINGS KENYA LTD

BY

VICTORIA MUMASSABBA

A Research Project Report Submitted to the Chandaria School of

Business in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of
Master of Business Administration (MBA)

UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY-AFRICA

SUMMER 2015
 STUDENT’S DECLARATION

I, the undersigned, declare that this is my original work and has not been submitted to any
other college, institution or university other than the United States International
University in Nairobi for academic credit.

Signed: ________________________ Date: _________________________

Victoria Mumassabba (ID: 638118)

This research project proposal has been presented for examination with my approval as
the appointed supervisor.

Signed: ________________________ Date: _________________________

Dr. Michael Kirubi, Ph.D.

Signed: _______________________ Date: _________________________

Dean, Chandaria School of Business

ii
 COPYRIGHT
All rights reserved; no part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system
or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,
recording or otherwise without the express written authorization from the writer.

Victoria Mumassabba © 2015

iii
 ABSTRACT
The purpose of the study was to determine the effects of globalization on procurement.
The study was guided by the following research questions. What are the drivers of global
procurement at Nakumatt Holdings Limited? What are the global factors that affect the
adoption of global procurement at Nakumatt Holdings Limited? What are the global
procurement strategies at Nakumatt Holdings Limited? The study adopted a case study
research design approach. The scope of the study was limited to the procurement
department at Nakumatt headquarters in Nairobi. Since the study focused only on the
procurement department, census of the 35 procurement staff was carried out. The analysis
was both descriptive and inferential in nature. The descriptive analysis involved
calculation of percentages, means and frequencies. Analysis of variance was employed to
determine the relationship between the demographic groups and the dependent variables.
Statistical significance level in form of p values was used to infer findings to the entire
population. Findings were presented using tables and figures.

The study established that at Nakumatt, out of the four drivers studied, competition is the
major driver of global procurement followed by Technology; Government factors and
Cost factors. The competitive drivers arise in the sense that global procurement acts a
source of competitive innovation; provide opportunity for attracting the best talents for
competitive advantage; provide opportunity to procure products of high quality; and
ensures constant supply of goods for competitive advantage. Technology drivers are
through the integration of procurement systems that facilitate global procurement;
availability of online payment platforms; availability of the internet; and availability of
the mobile telephony system. Government drivers are through market liberalization;
favorable government policies; bilateral trade agreements between Kenya and other
countries; and adoption of International quality standards by the Kenya Bureau of
Standards for ease of global procurement. The cost drivers are economies of scale at the
global market; availability of a huge pool of quality product and qualified suppliers in the
global market which offer the buyer bargaining power; and the fact that global
procurement accelerate diffusion of technological innovation.

Secondly the study showed that out of the four challenges studied, currency fluctuations
presents the major challenge followed by complicated logistics, tariffs and non-tariff
barriers and culture and language barriers. The study indicated that the challenge of
currency fluctuations is caused by high currency exchange rates; loss of purchasing power

iv
of the local currency and instability of the local currency. The challenge of complicated
logistics is caused by high cost of logistics; longer inventory management process and
poor handling of return goods and containers. The challenge of tariffs and non-tariff
barriers is caused by bureaucratic delays at the custom; Road blocks and barriers; High
tariffs levied on imports.

The study also showed that out of the four strategies studied, low labor and quality of
standards is the main procurement strategies used at Nakumatt followed by good transport
systems and good human rights records and the rule of law. The study indicated that the
firm sources its goods from countries with lowest production labor cost; least cost on
forwarding services, low agency cost and from countries with reputation for quality
products. Secondly, the firm looks at the transport cost; access to spots-checks of
supplier’s facilities and access to the market on the ground to learn of any competitive
threats or supplier knock-offs. However majority were neutral as to whether the firm
considers transport networks. Third, majority indicated that the firm prefers sourcing
goods form countries managed democratically; the firm considers how the employees
who make the products are treated, the firm considers human rights records, considers the
level of state corruption and records on the rule of law.

The study concludes that competition is the major driver of global procurement at
Nakumatt followed by technology drivers; and Government drivers. The study further
concludes that currency fluctuations are the major challenges followed by complicated
logistics; and tariffs and non-tariff barriers. Finally, the study concludes that low labor
and quality of standards is the main procurement strategy employed at Nakumatt. The
company also considers availability of good infrastructure and transport systems good
human rights records.

The study recommends training of key staff members on global procurement agenda;
hedging to address the challenge of currency fluctuations; outsourcing of procurement
service to firms with the greatest capabilities in global procurement; constant monitoring
and controlling of global procurement activities; constantly forecasting demand against
lead times and costs; and investing in good relation with its service providers since these
relationships may in the long run adversely affect the organization’s global procurement
performance. Finally, further research on the other supermarket chains in Kenya is
welcome to draw sector wide conclusion.

v
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

This Research proposal could not have taken its present shape without the help and

ceaseless encouragements and suggestions from my Supervisor Dr. Michael Kirubi Ph.D.

and Business Research Lecturer, Dr. Peter Kiriri.

I remain profoundly grateful to them. They always believed in me and never wavered in

their input to the development of this work.

Further, I wish to acknowledge the support from my Statistics research tutor Miss

Jackline Sagwe who gave me valuable tuition on SPSS.

Finally, I wish to salute my family Mr. and Mrs. Mumassabba, my Son Troy Mukui,

Siblings, friends’ nephews and nieces for their friendship, love and affection beyond what

Maslow could envisage in his hierarchy of human needs.

vi
 DEDICATION

This work is dedicated to my dear family, the entire Mumassabba especially my beloved

Son Troy Mukui, Dad Mathias and Mum Grace who gave me strength to keep on fighting.

vii
 TABLE OF CONTENTS
STUDENT’S DECLARATION .................................................................................... ii
COPYRIGHT ............................................................................................................... iii
ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................. iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT............................................................................................ vi
DEDICATION ............................................................................................................. vii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................... x
LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................................ xi
LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................... xii
CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................ 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background of the Problem .................................................................................... 1
1.2 Statement of the Problem ....................................................................................... 3
1.3 Purpose of the Study .............................................................................................. 5
1.4 Research Questions ................................................................................................ 5
1.5 Importance of the Study ......................................................................................... 5
1.6 Scope of the Study ................................................................................................. 6
1.7 Definition of Terms ................................................................................................ 6
1.8 Chapter Summary .................................................................................................. 6
CHAPTER TWO ........................................................................................................... 8
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................................ 8
2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 8
2.2 Drivers of Global Procurement ............................................................................... 8
2.3 Factors Affecting Adoption of Global Procurement .............................................. 12
2.4 Global Procurement Strategies ............................................................................. 17
2.5 Chapter Summary ................................................................................................ 22
CHAPTER THREE..................................................................................................... 23
3.0 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .......................................................................... 23
3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 23
3.2 Research Design................................................................................................... 23
3.3 Population and Sampling Design .......................................................................... 24
3.4 Data Collection Method ....................................................................................... 25
3.5 Research Procedure .............................................................................................. 26

viii
 3.6 Data Analysis Method .......................................................................................... 26
3.7 Chapter Summary ................................................................................................ 27
CHAPTER FOUR ....................................................................................................... 28
4.0 RESULTS AND FINDINGS ................................................................................. 28
4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 28
4.2 Demographic Characteristics of the Respondents ................................................. 28
4.3 Drivers of Global Procurement ............................................................................. 31
4.4 Global Factors That Affect Adoption of Global Procurement ............................... 36
4.5 Global Procurement Strategies ............................................................................. 40
4.6 Chapter Summary ................................................................................................ 44
CHAPTER FIVE ......................................................................................................... 45
5.0 DISCUSSIONS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ..................... 45
5.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 45
5.2 Summary.............................................................................................................. 45
5.3 Discussions .......................................................................................................... 47
5.4 Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 52
5.5 Recommendations ................................................................................................ 54
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................ 55
APPENDICES ............................................................................................................. 70
Appendix A: Cover Letter .......................................................................................... 69
Appendix B: Questionnaire ........................................................................................ 70

ix
 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

FDI : Foreign Direct Investment

ICT : Information Communication Technology

IT : Information Technology

SPSS : Statistical Package for Social Sciences

WTO : World Trade Organization

x
 LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1: Study Population…………………………………………………….…..……24
Table 4.1: Highest Education Level…………………………………………….………..30
Table 4.2: Cronbach’s Alpha Analysis for Drivers of Global Procurement……………..32
Table 4.3: Cost Drivers…………………………………………………………………..33
Table 4.4: Competitive Drivers…………………………………………………………..33
Table 4.5: Government Drivers…………………………………………………………..34
Table 4.6: Technological Drivers………………………………………………………...34
Table 4.7: Ranking of Drivers of Global Procurement…………………………………..35
Table 4.8: One way Analysis of Variance for Drivers for Global Procurement…………35
Table 4.9: Cronbach’s Alpha Analysis Factors affecting Global Procurement………….36
Table 4.10: Currency Fluctuations……………………………………………………….37
Table 4.11: Complicated Logistics……………………………………………………….37
Table 4.12: Tariff and Non-Tariff Barriers…..…………………………………………..38
Table 4.13: Culture and Language Barriers……………………………………………...38
Table 4.14: Ranking of Factors that Affect Global Procurement……………………......39
Table 4.15: One way Analysis of Variance for Factors Affecting Global
Procurement………………………………………………………………………………39
Table 4.16: Cronbach’s Alpha Analysis for Global Procurement Strategies…………….40
Table 4.17: Low Labor and Quality Standards…………………………………………..41
Table 4.18: Good Transport System……………………………………………………...41
Table 4.19: Good Human Rights Records and Rule of Law……………………………..42
Table 4.20: Same Language and Culture………………………………………………...43
Table 4.21: Ranking of Strategies of Global Procurement………………………………43
Table 4.22: One way Analysis of Variance for Strategies for Global Procurement……..44

xi
 LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 4.1: Response Rate………………………………………………………………..28

Figure 4.2: Gender of the Respondents………………………….……………………….29

Figure 4.3: Age Group……………………………………………………………………29

Figure 4.4: Length of Service at Nakumatt………………………………………………30

Figure 4.5: Management Position………………………………………………….…….31

xii
 CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Problem

Today different nations of the world have become closer than ever witnessed in the human
history. This has created a platform where all manner of goods ranging from food stuff to
electronics to other manufactured goods are being traded across country borders (Geiersbach,
2010). In fact the speed at which the volume of goods, services and investments are being
transferred across national borders has increased rapidly over the past few decades.
According to Muhammad, Faheem, Dost and Abdullah (2011) approximately $1.5 billion
foreign exchange transactions are taking place daily while approximately $8.9 trillion of
goods are transacted across borders and $2.10 trillion of services are provided across the
borders.

Geiersbach (2010) call this globalization and attributes the rapid movement of goods and
services across national borders to a number of factors. He cites the revolutionary changes in
technologies which have provided the mechanisms that propel the growth of international
business. Secondly, there is the intensification of competition at both domestic and
international levels which has driven firms to look beyond their domestic markets for new
opportunities. Geiersbach (2010) continue that there has been the progressive removal of
barriers to trade and capital movements which has stimulated greater flows of exports,
imports and foreign direct investment (FDI).

Nyanchoka and Namusonge (2014) contend that those who cannot adapt to the global forces
sooner or later lose their relevance and struggle to survive but those who adjust and change
as the globalization proceeds convert global opportunities into strategies that strengthens and
makes them continuously relevant dealing with the threats from the environment more
effectively. According to Mikusova (2010), globalization can be understood in two ways.
First as a vision that would be called “inside -out.” She contends that from this perspective
globalization offers opportunities for further growth. Secondly there is the ‘outside – inside’
a perspective, which presents much more prominent limitations, implications and risks. This
has created new complex business environments and therefore companies must take

1
advantage of the opportunities presented and also learn to survive in the new complex
situation which comes with globalization (Mikusova, 2010). It must also be understood that
despite globalization being a universal trend, the process touches every nerve of the
organization. The effects are felt from human resource management to logistics to
procurement to operations to sales and marketing among others.

To understand the impact of globalization, we need to clearly understand the concept of

globalization. Earlier Frank (1988) saw globalization as either conceptualized modern
phenomena involving the breakdown of borders, the emergence of new technologies and a
mix of different cultures or phenomena with a long history which dates back to the first
known connections between countries and people in the world. This definition raises the
question as whether the world has changed so fundamentally to a point where the original
function of the country borders has been over taken by time (Herrmann, 2012). Later
Friedman (1999) defined globalization as the inexorable integration of markets, nation states,
and technologies to a degree never witnessed before- in a way that is enabling individuals,
corporations and nation-states to reach around the world further, faster, deeper and cheaper
than before, the spread of free-market capitalism to virtually every country in the world.

Palmer (2002) saw the concept as the diminution or elimination of state-enforced restrictions
on exchanges across borders and the increasingly integrated and complex global system of
production and exchange that has emerged as a result. Hamilton and Webster (2009) defined
globalization as political, economic, social and technological links in different countries.
According to Steger (2009) it is the shrinkage of time and space. The current study will adopt
the definition by Muhammad, et. al. (2011) which saw globalization as the process of
integrating different world economies. The scope encampases the integration among the
people, government and companies of different countries. The primary objective of this study
is to determine the effects of globalization on procurement activities within a multinational
organization.

According to Musanzikwa (2013) procurement is the process of identifying and obtaining

goods and services. He contends that this process includes sourcing, purchasing and covers
all activities from identifying potential suppliers through to delivery from supplier to the

2
users or beneficiary. Mangan, Lalwani and Butcher (2008) assert that it is favourable that the
goods/services are appropriate and that they are procured at the best possible cost to meet the
needs of the purchaser in terms of quality and quantity, time, and location.

The theoretical framework for the current study draws from environmental organization
literature since the study attempts to establish the link between the external environment
(globalization effects) and procurement. The study focuses on the opportunities/threats which
are sub dimensions of the environmental dimension. According to Thoumrungroje and
Tansuhaj (2007), amid globalization, firms are affected by the changes in both market
opportunities and threats. They posit that these opportunities and threats presents the
dimensions of the macro environment and can be regarded as forces which affect
organizational outputs.

The general assumption is that developments in information technology, removal of trade

and investment barriers, privatization, and deregulation of trade and investment policies
which are salient features of globalization creates business environments which enable firms
not only to access new markets, lower operational costs but also to exploit cheap resources
around the world i.e firms can source resources at lower costs from around the world. On the
other hand, globalization also increases competition;customer awareness which faciliate
switching; and resource scarcity (Thoumrungroje & Tansuhaj, 2007).The study therefore
hypothesis that procurement outputs are influenced by globalization.

Nakumatt Holdings Limited is a wholly Kenyan, privately held company established in 1987
with an annual turnover of $450 million. In 2014, the company had over 40 branches spread
across East Africa serving more than 200,000 customers per day and offer a range of over
75,000 products (Nakumatt, 2015). The company is built on the principle of providing a
variety of affordable quality brands. This has seen the company import a number of products
to meet the varying customer demands in its store chains in the region.

1.2 Statement of the Problem

In the midst of changes in the global scene, the global procurement scene has experienced
rapid changes over the last one or two decades (Hussein & Shale, 2014). As markets become
more and more globalized through regional and international trade agreements and treaties,

3
procurement practitioners face greater challenges and opportunities (Thai, 2007). The
challenges range from compliance cross border laws and regulations, communication
barriers, currency exchange rates and payment, customs regulations, lead-time,
transportation, foreign government regulations, trade agreements, and transportation there are
also opportunities such as access new markets, lower operational costs but also to exploit
cheap resources around the world i.e firms can source resources at lower costs from around
the world (Thoumrungroje & Tansuhaj, 2007). Therefore it is imperative to create an
understanding on the impacts of globalization on procurement functions for those firms
which operate across their country borders. A number of studies have been carried out on the
subject of globalization and its impact on business performance but none has focused on the
impacts of globalization on procurement at Nakumatt Holdings Limited.

A study by Hussein and Shale (2014) looked at the effects of sustatinable procurement
practices within the context of the global environment. The study only focused on Unilever
Kenya Limited which is a manufacturing firm. Further, a study by Nyanchoka and
Namusonge (2014) looked on the effects of globalization on Sourcing of materials at Kenya
Tea Development Agency. The study indicated that it takes time to effectively implement a
global sourcing initiative, and even longer to do it correctly to positively impact on the
supply chain performance of an organization. The study was also significant in highlighting
that reduced cost and competitive advantages as some of the positive impacts the Agency
derived from globalization. Even though this research is instrumental in indicating the
impacts of globalization on procurement, the findings were based only on the manufacturing
sector. It did not have empirical evidence from the retail sector where Nakumatt operates.

In the retail industry, Magenda & Iravo (2014) studied the factors affecting the adoption of
global sourcing at Tuskys Supermarkets Kenya. The study found out that the adoption of
global sourcing was not effective in the organization due to varying factors, including and
not limited to complicated logistics, currency fluctuations, and the tariff and non-tariff
barriers in varying degrees. The study concluded that there is no universal compass to pursue
global sourcing and the companies that succeed will be the ones that have learned how to
leverage and coordinate their activities on a worldwide basis.These findings suggests that

4
success or failure of procurement in a global stage is firm specific and depends on the
circumstances under which the firm operates.

The fact that no study had been carried out at Nakumatt holdings to empirically ascetain the
impact of globalization on procurement at Nakumatt presents a knowledge gap. It would be
important to have a case study based on the company due to the significant role the company
has played in development of the Kenyan towns. The company also presents a unique
context.

1.3 Purpose of the Study

The purpose of the study was to determine the effects of globalization on procurement.

1.4 Research Questions

1.4.1 What are the drivers of global procurement at Nakumatt Holdings Limited?

1.4.2 What are the global factors that affect the adoption of global procurement at Nakumatt
Holdings Limited?

1.4.3 What are the global procurement strategies at Nakumatt Holdings Limited?

1.5 Importance of the Study

The findings of the study will be of significance to the following stakeholders;

1.5.1 Nakumatt Holdings Kenya Limited and Related Industry

The study sought to identify the drivers and effects of global procurement. This information
will be important to Nakumatt holdings and the retail industry as it gives empirical evidence
which the organizations can use to design more effective strategies.

1.5.2 Policy Makers

The information will offer insightful information to the Kenya Government. The information
will be helpfully in developing favorable policies and regulations for local companies which
intend to procure materials internationally.

5
1.5.3 Academicians
The findings of the study will act as source of empirical data and reference point for other
scholars interested in the field, particularly those who will be interested in furthering
knowledge on the key factors that affect global procurement within the retail industry.

1.6 Scope of the Study

The scope of the study was limited to the procurement department at the Nakumatt holdings
headquarters in Nairobi. The Study sought opinion of staff in the procurement department.
The study was also limited in time. Data collection was carried out in the month of June
2015. Since the data collected was linked to organizational information, it was expected that
some respondents could not be willing to disclose full information. The respondents were
assured of confidentiality of the information given to enhance response rate and truthfulness.

1.7 Definition of Terms

1.7.1 Globalization
Globalization is the process of integrating different world economies. The scope encampases
the integration among the people, government and companies of different countries
(Muhammad, Faheem, Dost, & Abdullah, 2011)

1.7.2 Procurement
Procurement is the process of identifying and obtaining goods and services (Musanzikwa,
2013).

1.7.3 Global Procurement

A procurement strategy in which a business seeks to find the most cost efficient location for
sourcing goods and services, even if the location is in a foreign country (Nyanchoka &
Namusonge, 2014).

1.8 Chapter Summary

Chapter one discussed the significance of the concept of the study [globalization]. It also
highlighted the significance of the concept on the context [globalization on procurement].
The study then identified the theory upon which the study will be based. The chapter has also
given the problem statement, research objectives, significance of the study and terminologies
to be used in the study. Chapter two presents the literature review of the study. Chapter three

6
covers the methodology, Chapter four presents the study findings while Chapter five presents
the study summary, discussions, conclusions and recommendations.

7
 CHAPTER TWO

2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Introduction
Chapter two reviews literature on the subject of global procurement. The chapter has four
sections. Section 2.2 discusses the drivers of global procurement which include cost drivers,
competitive drivers, government drivers and technology drivers. Section 2.3 discusses the
global factors that affect adoption of global procurement including currency fluctuations,
complicated logistics, tariff and non-tariff barriers and culture/language. Section 2.4
discusses the global procurement strategies which include deliberate decisions to procure
from low labour cost countries, countries with good infrastructure, good records of human
rights and countries of same languages. Section 2.5 offers the chapter summary.

2.2 Drivers of Global Procurement

2.2.1 Cost Drivers
According to Hultman, Hertz, Johnsen and Johnsen (2012), affordability through low cost is
at the core of any company’s business idea. Hemmatfar, Salehi and Bayat (2010) posit that
any organization seeks a competitive advantage in their industries. They contend that
companies achieve competitive advantages by delivering products or services at a lower cost
i.e. a cost related to the quality of the product or service that will be both attractive in the
market place and will yield sufficient return on investment. Thus, cost of production is quite
instrumental for organizations to produce competitive products and services. This concept is
related to Porter's generic strategies of low-cost competitive strategy.

Cost as a driver of global procurement has been linked to comparative cost advantage theory.
The theory proposes that a country must specialize in those products that it can produce
relatively more efficiently than other countries (Smit, 2010). Comparative advantage thus
also leads to specialization which bring more, better and cheaper goods to consumers (higher
efficiency) (Kattel & Lember, 2010). Heckscher-Ohlin model, assumes that the source of
comparative cost advantages is the effect of different endowments of factors of production.
Hence, each nation has a comparative advantage “in the production of commodities into

8
which enter considerable amounts of factors abundant and cheap” in this nation and will
specialize accordingly (Schumacher, 2013).

Therefore, under increasing pressures to reduce costs, companies have shifted, and continue
to shift, sourcing from local suppliers to low cost country-based suppliers (Hultman, Hertz,
Johnsen, & Johnsen, 2012). In a study to determine the drivers of global procurement at
Kenya Tea Development Agency, Nyanchoka and Namusonge (2014) indicated that even
though there is a continuing push for economies of scale, it is evident that in Kenya,
suppliers have not yet been able to produce machinery and other agricultural inputs at
economical costs which increases the cost of product development relative to market life
hence the drive to source internationally where there is a huge pool of qualified suppliers.

The study therefore hypothesis that if the total sum of the cost of a product and the cost of
procurement is sufficiently lower than the cost of the same product manufactured in another
country, then the country with price disadvantage will tend to import or procure goods and
services from the country with lower prices.

2.2.2 Competitive Drivers

Literature leaves no doubt that globalization is creating increasingly competitive markets,
which in turn create the need for reduced lead times in innovation and production, both of
which require global companies to manage their resources more proactively on a global
basis (Yeniyurt, Henke-Jr., & Cavusgil, 2012). According to Geiersbach (2010),
intensification of competition at both domestic and international levels has driven firms to
look beyond their domestic markets for new opportunities.

Such opportunities like higher quality and greater material availability are well aligned to
achieving competitive advantage as proposed in the Porter’s competitive strategies. Jiang
and Tian (2010) contend that global sourcing has been considered by more and more
enterprises as positive strategic activity under the pressures from global competition. One of
the specific drivers of global procurement is the product quality based competition (Mwangi,
2013).

A study by Jiang and Tian (2010) to detrmine the problems and challenges of global
sourcing in Chinese manufacturing enterprises indicated that the higher demand for technical

9
quality of manufactured products is one of the factors driving more Chinese manufacturers to
adopt a global sourcing strategy in order to improve their competitive advantage by helping
the firms to optimize the use of global resources.

Therefore, global competition can be used to wither competion since global procurement can
be used to acquire high quality products where locally produced goods do not achieve and
maintain the required quality and efficiency to meet the required targets (Nyanchoka &
Namusonge, 2014). Jiang and Tian (2010) gives an example of unsatisfactory quality of
domestic products. They posit that the quality of products obtained from the domestic market
may not meet the requirements of buyers or they may not be sufficient for the manufacturers
to sell their products to international markets where higher standards may apply. Similarly,
domestic supplier may not be able to provide satisfactory warranties or after-sales services to
the manufacturers. Global procurement in this sense enable the firms to source for superior
goods that meet customer demands, thus gains a competitive edge over ther competitors.

2.2.3 Government Drivers

The role of government in facilitating or creating barriers for international trade cannot be
under estimated. In acknowledgement of the positive significance of free trade, World Trade
Organization has been at the fore front in fronting agreements that create a framework that
aims at establishing global economic development via liberalizing global trade (Anderson &
Kovacic, 2009). Kattel and Lember (2010) posit that Government procurement, which
constitutes more than10% of national economy in most countries, has for a long time been
used for supporting national interests and is perceived by many as one of the main barriers to
free trade. They argue that in accordance to the comparative advantage theory, the so called
discriminatory government procurement makes states worseoff in the long run because it
leads to inefficient allocation of resources and limits the benefits stemming from free trade.
Instigators of these policies fail to realise the benefits from liberalized procurement such as
access to other markets, support for liberalizing countries’own markets, increased
competition that leads to increased (international) competitiveness, job creation and
budgetary savings (Kattel & Lember, 2010).

According to Chou (2006), Government support for global trade arises where the country
abides by a set of rules for liberalizing the economy and relaxing state controlover foreign

10
trade and investment. He posits that noticing the gain through granting preferential policies to
foreign investors and lowering transaction costs, bureaucratic units and localities in highly
regulated context seek for liberalizing their economic activities and integrating themselves
with the world economy.

According to Cottier and Oesch (2011), trade liberalization occurs where there is non-
discrimination of products or service regardless of their source. They explain that it is
essentially a ban on distinctions based upon the origin of products and the nationality of
persons. Trade libereralization laws eliminate granting of privileges and un due protection to
domestic products and nationals. The liberalization can be achieved through tariffs and taxes
which are the classical field addressing non-discrimination in international economic law as
import and export tariffs are inherently discriminatory as they privilege domestically
produced and sold goods (Cottier & Oesch, 2011). Deliberately lowering inhibitory tariffs to
cross border movement of goods can act as a facilitator for global procurement of goods and
services. Economically, tariff reductions should reduce the price of imported goods which
makes them more competitive.

The liberalization can also be achieved by loweing non tariff barriers. According to Mohan,
Khorana and Choudhury (2012), non tariff barriers include quantitative restrictions, subsidies,
anti dumping and counter vailing duties, customs valuations, product standards and technical
regulations. They posit that these are measures, different from ordinary customs tariffs, that
distort trade and reduce economic welfare and often such barriers are attributed to state
activities and policy measures that typically have the potential to reduce quantity of imports,
increase the price of imports, change elasticity of demand for imports, and increase
uncertainty in the implementation of tariff preferences. The study therefore hypothesis that
market liberalization enables efficient management of global procurement.

2.2.4 Technology
In the words of Mose, Njihia and Magutu (2013), the use of Information Communication
Technologies (ICTs) has dramatically changed services, business models and people’s
expectations of the quality and efficiency of information sharing and service delivery. They
contend that development in information and communication technology, especially the
Internet helps organizations to become more effective through the integration of firm’s
11
information technology (IT) infrastructure. It also helps firms to manage instant
communication and interactions with other people across the globe.

Technology provides the capability to generate innovations and deliver new goods and
services to the market. The ability of international organization to exploit technology to
enhance global operations is a depiction of the capacity of the international organizations to
co-ordinate and operates efficiently across international boundaries (Geiersbach, 2010).
McIntosh and Sloan (2001) earlier alluded that technology especially the internet assist in
opening a company up to a global market. They indicate that this technology makes it easy
for organizations to search for overseas suppliers capable of satisfying their needs. This
provides several sources of information about potential suppliers. These searches may be
inform of online professional contacts, trade journals, directories, social networks and other
online based platform. This makes use of the efficient use of world-wide human connection
to achieve efficient procurement.

Otieno, Muthoni and Simon (2013) conclude that in procurement, technology aims at
creating efficiencies i.e. to make the traditional purchasing procedures more efficient and
cost effective. For example internet has allowed firms to float online tenders which can be
accessed anywhere globally and has greatly improved the accessibility of tenders.

2.3 Factors Affecting Adoption of Global Procurement

2.3.1 Currency Fluctuations

According to Kurihara (2013), since the introduction of the floating exchange rate system
during the 1970s, many studies have been presented to show the relationship between
exchange rate fluctuations and international trade. He posits that most studies have provided
evidence that the increase of exchange rate volatility dampens international trade as expected.
For example, a study by Kandil, Berument and Dincer (2007) indicated that a depreciation
(or devaluation) of the domestic currency may stimulate economic activity within the country
through the initial increase in the price of foreign goods relative to home goods. This means
that exchange rate depreciation diverts spending from foreign goods to domestic goods. A
fact which directly affects procuring of goods from outside the country.

12
Kandil, et. al. (2007) further alludes that the success of currency depreciation in promoting
trade balance largely depends on switching demand in the proper direction and amount, as
well as on the capacity of the home economy to meet the additional demand by supplying
more goods. To put it into perspective, currency depreciation lower export prices while
raising import prices. The converse is true where currency appreciation gives the domestic
currency more economic power to buy more foreign goods. In summary, currency
depreciation increases net exports and increases the cost of production while currency
appreciation decreases net exports and the cost of production. Thus, the cyclic movement
between depreciation and appreciation directly affects global procurement.

In a study to establish the effects of exchange rate varaibility on international trade, Coric
and Pugh (2010) linked the increased exchange rate fluctuations to negative effects on
international trade. Another empirical study to try and determine the effects of exchange rate
volatility on export flows for South American countries by (Serenis, 2013) showed an
adverse relationship between exports and exchange volatility.

Further, Jiranyakul (2013) in an attempt to determine the relationship between exchange rate
uncertainty and import demand of Thailand indicated a negative impact of exchange rate
uncertainty on Thailand’s imports. Similarly, Verheyen (2012) studied the role of exchange
rate volatilty on bilateral exports from Euro Zone Countries to the US. The study confirmed
that exchange rate volatility causes a negative influence on international trade between the
United States and the Euro zone.

An evaluation by Nicita (2013) to determine the extent to which the exchange rate affects
international trade and trade policy indicated that exchange rate misalignments do affect
international tradeflows in a substantial manner. The study found out that currency under
valuation is found to promote exports and restrict imports, while the converse holds in the
case of over valuation. He posits that in magnitude, misalignments across currencies result in
trade diversion quantifiable in about 1 per cent of world trade.

Nicita (2013) further indicated that with regard to volatility, exchange rate volatility is
probably not a major policy concern. He notes that from the perspective of enhancing trade,
the effects of lower volatility are indirect and originate from long-term exchange rate

13
commitments such as currency unions and pegged exchange rates rather than short-term
exchange rate fluctuation. Thus, the limited importance of exchange rate volatility is possibly
related to the increasing availability of financial instruments to hedge against exchange rate
risks (e.g. forward contract and currency options) (Kurihara, 2013) and to the increasing
share of intra-industry trade (Nicita, 2013).

Magenda and Iravo (2014) conclude that stability of currency enables the international trade
to be easier while instability makes it more complex and introduces risk. They assert that if
trade amounts to tens of millions of dollars, a 0.5% deviation of exchange rate could affect
the effectiveness of global sourcing strategy and profitability of the whole supply chain.
Moreover, 4% deviation could result in a disastrous end.

2.3.2 Complicated Logistics

Zeng and Rossetti (2003) contend that logistics processes form the critical loops of supply
chains and oversee the flows of materials, information and cash, which are the essential
elements of fulfilling customers’ orders. They continue that as greater distances, currencies
and cultures separate markets, suppliers and manufacturers, logistics plays a more critical
role in the success of the supply chains. Therefore the role played by transportation and
logistics excellence in achieving a world-class supply chain cannot be ignored.

According to Magenda and Iravo (2014) logistics involves integration of information,

transportation, inventory, warehousing, material handling and packaging. Thus, they contend
that logistical management includes the design and administration of systems to control the
flow of materials, work in process and finished inventory to support business unit strategy
with the overall goal being to achieve a targeted level of customer service at the lowest
possible total cost. Musanzikwa (2013) posits that procurement must be seamlessly
integrated with the other aspects of logistics and functions within the organisation, such as
Warehousing, Distribution, Finance, and human resources. According to Shaw (2010) a
logistic system with clear communicationlines, timely flow of documentation and constant
feedback facilitates the procurement process. A study on international supply chain
practices in Tanzania by Msimangira and Tesha (2009) identified logistics challenges of
coping with long supply chains as one of the problems affecting global procurement systems.

14
Msimangira and Tesha (2014) assert that different countries employ different existing
transportation and logistics structural methods which creates complexity in global logistics.
A fact supported by Jiang and Tian (2010) who indicated that logistics in global sourcing is
prone to transportation delays, border-crossing procedures and longer inventory management.
Therefore, international trade, sourcing, and global transportation need knowledge of
countries’ supply chain networks in order to establish seamless and efficient transportation,
and logistics performance (Msimangira & Tesha, 2014). In reference to developing countries,
Jiang and Tian (2010) add that lack of holistic logistics knowledge in low-cost developing
countries may trouble procurement executives when implementing global sourcing since
less-developed country suppliers may be short of experience with the most advanced
approaches and are usually unfamiliar with high-standard requirements, such as sequence
deliveries combined with Just-In-Time; electronic data interchange communications and
vendor-managed inventory solutions which are important capabilities of supply chain
management in determining how much benefits a company can derive from global sourcing.
Furthermore low-grade infrastructure of logistics in developing countries may influence the
efficiency of global sourcing (Jiang & Tian, 2010).

2.3.3 Tariff and Non-Tariff Barriers

Goods and services do not flow completely freely among countries. In fact countries put
deliberate barriers to free flow of trade due to a number of reasons. Tariffs and taxes have
been touted as the classical methods for establishing discrimination in international imports
and exports.Tariffs are inherently discriminatory as they privilege domestically produced and
sold goods (Cottier & Oesch, 2011). Okumu and Nyankori (2010) posit that globally, tariffs
have been declining as a result of multilateral, regional and bilateral trade liberalization.
Despite this, many countries have instituted alternative protectionist mechanisms, non trade
barriers, which are ever changing and are threatening international free flow of goods and
services (Nathan Associates, 2013).

According to Love and Lattimore (2009), the alternative protectionist mechanisms may be to
protect domestic companies from foreign competition; protect consumers from dangerous
and undesired products; safeguard national security; safeguard revenue loss; safeguard lives
and property; or the barriers may even be un-intended due to complicated custom procedures.

15
This may also include precautionary principle, or foresight planning has recently been
proposed as a justification for government restrictions on trade in the context of
environmental and health concerns (Okumu & Nyankori, 2010). Non-tariff barriers encompass
a variety of government actions affecting trade. These may include quotas, health and
environmental regulations, licensing requirements, and mandatory product inspections
(Nathan Associates, 2013).

Rickard and Kono (2013) give an example of discrimination in public procurement as one
particularly contentious issue behind-the-border barrier to trade. They posit that
Governments that discriminate in procurement systematically favour domestic producers
over foreign ones when buying otherwise similar goods and services e.g. ‘Buy America bill’
of 2009 required that all stimulus-funded projects use only American-made iron and steel.
Similarly, Doanh and Heo (2007) cite the case of Thailand, where while procurement
regulations stipulate non-discriminatory treatment and open competition to all bidders and
suppliers, preference is given to Thai products, contractors, and consultants. Further,
preferential treatment is provided to domestic suppliers, which receive an automatic 15-
percent price advantage over foreign bidders in initial bid round evaluations. Kenyan
Government on the other hand sets aside 30 percent of procurement services to youths and
women.

The study therefore hypothesis that, tariff and non-tariff based barriers instituted by
governments directly influences the amounts of goods and services that is imported or
exported from a country, hence the more stringent the barriers, the less the quantity of goods
and service that a business enterprise can import into the country from the international arena.

2.3.4 Culture and Language Differences

Kivrak, Ross, Arslan and Tuncan (2009) presents three definitions of the term culture as, ‘the
collective programming of the mind which distinguishes one group from another’; or ‘what
we are and what we do as a society’ or ‘varieties of common knowledge’. From these
definitions, it can be pointed out that different societies have different ways of conducting
themselves or simply different societies have different ways of doing things.

16
Jiang and Tian (2010) explain that because the suppliers under the international purchasing
come from different parts of the world, they hold various models, standards, and cultures.
Hence, it is very significant for businesses to develop systematic and standardized criteria
and conditions in order to select a dependable supplier. This is further acknowledge by
Hultman, Hertz, Johnsen and Johnsen (2012) who indicated that using the knowledge from
markets with similar features in terms of, for example, language and culture facilitated
expansion of sourcing markets.

Culture may not only exist at the supplier level but also at the government level. For example,
Hasan and Alim (2010) cite the case of bureaucracy as a typical culture in Bangladesh. They
posit that bureaucracy takes place in government, semi government and private organization
where excessive bureaucracy is a custom and different organizations waste huge time that
affect lead time for customer orders. They conclude that in such cases, suppliers run from
one office to another to maintain a lot of complicated procedure in order to get different
permission. A process which takes a long time to generate a shipment and acts as an obstacle,
thus, bureaucracy affects the flow of supply chain process.

2.4 Global Procurement Strategies

According to Carter, Maltz, Yan and Maltz (2008) effective sourcing of goods and services
requires good processes to evaluate the many factors related to where to source from. This
involves finding the supplier locations globally that align best with the organizational plans.
They indicate that such processes will often include screening steps with respect to
geography, infrastructure, market attractiveness, risks and cost levels which are
characteristics of regions or countries rather than specific suppliers. The current study
explores the global procurement strategies which include procuring goods and services from
countries with low cost labour and quality products; from countries with good infrastructure;
from countries with good human rights records; and from countries speaking the same
language.

2.4.1 Procuring from Countries with Low Labor Cost and Quality Standards

Öztürk (2012) asserts that in today’s competitive global markets, consumers look for the
highest quality products at the lowest prices, regardless of where they are produced. He

17
continues that this trend is continuously increasing the significance of global markets and
forcing enterprises to analyze the available alternatives as they seek to remain competitive
e.g. by managing their costs to gain competitive advantages. Further, Lanza, Weiler and Vogt
(2009) observes that with the growing competition both in the domestic and global markets,
competitive prices are the precondition for gaining market shares in the domestic market as
well as abroad. Hence, this fierce cost competition is forcing companies to focus on their
core competencies and to pay particular attention to their purchasing decisions. Lanza,
Weiler and Vogt (2009) posit that in procurement, low-cost country sourcing which is linked
to low labor costs plays a special role as considerable cost savings can be realized in this area.

Öztürk (2012) adds that while firms establish and execute global sourcing plans in an effort
to match competitors’ attempts at sourcing; improve non-competitive cost structures; focus
on core competencies; reduce capital investment and overall fixed costs; achieve cost-
competitive growth within their supply base for goods, services and technologies in the value
chain; they also aim to establish future procurement footprints in low-cost countries.

The challenge with low cost country sourcing as eluded by (Lanza, et. al., 2009) is that low-
cost suppliers often do not meet the higher quality standards which are required by
multinational companies. They contend that when promising suppliers were chosen,
measures to promote development such as technical support and continuous process control
at the supplier’s production site are necessary in order to guarantee a reliable product quality
as well as on-time delivery.

On the other hand, some companies tend to focus on procuring products based on quality
rather than cost. A study to determine factors affecting the selection of optimal suppliers in
procurement management, Mwikali and Kavale (2012) identified quality of the product as a
major creterion in selection of suppliers. The study was aligned to value chain quality
management and measured quality in terms of management commitment, product
development of suppliers, process improvement of suppliers, quality planning and quality
assurance in supply chain, quality assessment in production, inspection and experimentation,
quality staff of supplier and quality of the final product. From the review, a company may
therefore make a deliberate effort to target countries with low labour cost or high quality
standard products depending on the customer demands and economic power.

18
2.4.2 Procuring from Countries with Good Transport Infrastructure
Without a doubt, transport is an indispensable part of international trade. It provides vital
distribution for production, as well as essential personal mobility, directly interconnecting
businesses to worldwide markets. In fact the global procurement would be meaningless
without the ability to move goods and people around the planet (Ślusarczyk, 2010). Looking
at the definition of supply logistics, it helps in understanding the significance of
infrastructure in the procurement process. Council of Logistics Management (1991) defined
logistics as ‘part of the supply chain process that plans, implements, and controls the efficient,
effective forward and reverse flow and storage of goods, services, and related information
between the point of origin and the point of consumption in order to meet customers’
requirements’. This means that proper efficient infrastructure is required to successfully
achieve the objectives of all the indicators of effective procurement logistics.

The fundamental impact of infrastructure on international movement of goods lies on the cost
factor. The nature of infrastructure directly affects the cost of moving goods across borders.
While giving an example of transport, the World Trade Report of 2013 indicated that some of
the factors that influence transport cost include geographical features of countries, the
quantity and quality of the physical infrastructure that support transportation services, the
procedures and formalities used to control the movement of goods from one country to
another, the extent of competition in the transportation sector, the pace of technological
innovation in the sector and the cost of fuel (World Trade Organization, 2013). These factors
directly influences whether a market is accessible or not for international procurement of
goods and services.

The 2013 World Trade report further indicates that the cost of transporting goods from
producers to users affects the volume, direction and pattern of trade. It determines where the
line between tradable and non-tradable goods is drawn and shapes which firms are able to
participate in trade and how they organize their production internationally (World Trade
Organization, 2013). This example shows how infrastructure be it in transport,
communication, management or control of procurement process is critical as it will directly
influence the cost of procurement. The study therefore assumed that a company may

19
deliberately focus on countries with good infrastructure when conducting global procurement
of goods and services.

2.4.3 Procuring from Countries with Good Human Rights Records and Rule of Law
Questions have arisen in the international trade with regard to promotion of human rights.
Rights such as freedom of association, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of
movement, freedom from political repression, freedom from torture, freedom from slavery,
freedom from exploitation among others may appear obvious in some countries but they
cannot be assumed to be universal. Multinational companies and state agents have
participated in human rights violations such as forced labour, child labour or even over
exploitation of workforce among other human rights violations (Byrne, 2014).

Good human right records and rule of law for international business stems from the concept
of corporate social responsibility or ethical dimensions in conducting a business. According
to Velentzas and Broni (2010), business ethics consists of a set of moral principles and values
that govern the behavior of the organization with respect to what is right and what is wrong.
Therefore the manner in which some businesses conduct themselves brings up the question
of ethical behavior.

Velentzas and Broni (2010) contend that business ethics should eliminate exploitation, from
the sweat shop children who are making sneakers to the coffee serving staff who are being
ripped off in wages beside the fact that business ethics can be applied to everything from the
trees cut down to make thepaper that a business sells to the ramifications of importing coffee
from certain countries. This therefore means that business enterprises should respect human
rights and should avoid infringing on the human rights of others and should address adverse
human rights impacts with which they are involved (Lindsay, McCorquodale, Blecher,
Bonnitcha, Crockett, & Sheppard, 2013).

In a nut shell, international businesses have the opportunity to control perpetuation of what
could be termed as unethical behaviors. Even though international firms cannot be forced in
some jurisdictions to comply with ethical behaviors, it is their moral duty to uphold and
promote human rights by avoiding participation in the unethical habits and discouraging
others from engaging in such habits. Hence, companies that are conscious of the significance

20
of upholding human rights can choose not to buy or sell goods to certain regions depending
on the region’s human rights record as a strategy of promoting human rights.

2.4.4 Procuring from Countries with Same Language

The other strategy that can be adopted for global procurement is targeting of countries
speaking the same language to facilitate faster processes. A study by Otten (2014) showed
that the impact of language and cultural differences is likely to be important in transactions
where individuals have to coordinate with each other. The study indicates that language
boundaries, as is often the case in international factor movements, reduces the level of trust
between economic agents and makes obtaining information more costly by raising hurdles in
communication. According to Otten (2014), both economic theory and empirical evidence
suggest that sharing an official or speaking a common language provide an important
stimulus in international economic exchange and having a common language has been
attributed to an increase in trade flows by about 40%.

A study by Nyanchoka and Namusonge (2014) illustrated how crucial communication is

when dealing with global supply sources. The study pointed out that Kenya Tea
Development Agency, doesn’t take chances especially when doing business in foreign
countries where language could be a barrier. It shows that the agency not only have invested
in training its staff foreign languages, but have successfully managed to employ a pool
proficient in foreign languages or expatriates to enhance communication.

Therefore it reduces the level of mistrust between economic agents and the cost of
communication, certain organizations may opt to trade with countries speaking the same
language or alternatively trade staff on the suppliers preferred language to enhance
communication and efficient coordination. This is particularly important in global
procurement where information sourcing and negotiations requires proper understanding of
the economic players involved in the process.

21
2.5 Chapter Summary

Chapter two discussed the literature review in line with the research objectives. It discussed
the drivers of global procurement, challenges of global procurement and possible global
procurement strategies. Chapter three will discuss the study methodology to be adopted for
the foregoing study.

22
 CHAPTER THREE

3.0 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1 Introduction

This chapter discusses the research methodology adopted for this study. It gives a systematic
procedure followed to achieve the objectives of the study. It covers the research design,
population and sampling plan, data collection method, research procedure and data analysis
method.

3.2 Research Design

Research design is a basic set of beliefs that guide action and deals with principles, ‘ultimates’
or the researcher’s worldviews (Groenewald, 2004). It represents the researcher’s logical
view on how study objectives can be realized. The current study adopted a case study
research approach. According to Hyett, Kenny and Dickson-Swift (2014), a case study
research is an investigation and analysis of a single or collective case, intended to capture the
complexity of the object of study. The study used Nakumatt Holdings Limited as case study.

The approach was descriptive and quantitative in nature. According to (Salaria, 2012),
descriptive research is devoted to gathering of information about prevailing conditions or
situations for the purpose of sketch and interpretation. He posits that this type of research
method is not simply amassing and tabulating facts but includes proper analysis,
interpretation, comparisons, identification of trends and relationships.

Harwell (2011) notes that quantitative design attempts to maximize objectivity, replicability,
and generalizability of findings, and are typically interested in prediction. This approach was
appropriate for the study since the study sought to identify empirically the prevailing effects
of globalization on procurement at Nakumatt Holdings Limited to act as a predictor of the
situation in the retail industry in Kenya. The dependent variable of study is global
procurement while the independent variables in this study are cost factors; competition;
government policies; technology; currency fluctuations; complicated logistics; tariffs; culture
and language globalization.

23
3.3 Population and Sampling Design
3.3.1 Population
Salaria (2012) defines population as all the members of any well defined class of people,
events or objects. Thus it represents individuals who have one or more characteristics in
common that are of interest to the researcher. The population may be all the individuals of a
particular type or a more restricted part of that group (Salaria, 2012). The population of the
study was all the 35 procurement staff members at Nakumatt Holdings headquarters
(Nakumatt, 2015). The population was classified into senior management, middle
management and non management staff.

Table 3.1: Study Population

Management Level Sample Frame Total Percentage

Senior level management 4 11%

Middle level management 11 31%
Non-management staff 20 57%
Total 35 100%
Source: Nakumatt (2015)
3.3.2 Sampling Design
Cooper and Schindler (2008) defines sampling design as the systematic procedure by which a
particular sample is drawn from a population. It explains the how of arriving at the sample
size.
3.3.2.1 Sampling Frame
Gallardo, Lachlan and Davis (2012) defined sampling frame as that part of the population
that can be accessed during a study i.e. it can be thought of as the realistic version of the
population—the ones which can be identified and accessed. In the study, the sample frame
was 35 procurement staff at Nakumatt headquarters. The sample frame was identified by the
staff details kept by the company’s human resources department.

24
3.3.2.2 Sampling Technique
This is the process of taking any portion of a population or universe to serve as a
representative of that population or universe. It may also simply mean the process of drawing
a sample from the population (Salaria, 2012). A census was conducted on the procurement
department, consisting of the senior procurement managers, middle level procurement
managers and the non-management procurement staff. Considering that the procurement
department consists of 35 employees, it was considered best to conduct a census.

3.3.2.3 Sample Size

According to Garson (2012), a sample size is a subset (sampling units that does not comprise
the complete set of sampling units that has been defined as the population) of a sampling
units from a population. In other words, Salaria (2012) defines sample size as a group chosen
from a larger population with the aim of yielding information about this population as a
whole. He contends that a good sample not only needs to be representative, it needs also to
be adequate or of sufficient size to allow confidence in the stability of its characteristics. For
this study, no samples were drawn but the entire population of 35 procurement staff was
involved in the survey.

3.4 Data Collection Method

The study used a questionnaire to collect primary data from the respondents. According to
Harris and Brown (2010), a questinnaire come in handy when gathering standardized
information ove a short period of time in a short time frame.

The questionnaire was arranged according to the research objectives. It had four sections of
which the first section sought to identify demographic characteristics of the population. This
information was useful in comparing responses between various groups. The second section
sought to identify the drivers of global procurement. The third section explored the
challenges affecting the implementation of global procurement. The fourth section sought to
identify the global procurement strategies used at Nakumatt Holdings Limited.

The questions had two formats. There was a set of five point Likert scale. The scale was
ranked [1] is strongly disagree; [2] disagree; [3] neutral; [4] agree; and [5] strongly agree.
The Likert scale offered the respondents an opportunity to rank their responses depending on

25
strength of their opinion on the test items. The study also had open ended questions which
gave the respondents an opportunity to give their opinions without restriction.

3.5 Research Procedure

Before the actual study, a pilot test was carried out on 5 respondents. These respondents were
excluded from the finally study to eliminate introduction of bias from having had prior
information about the study. The pilot assisted in the identification of mistakes and ambiguity
of the test items. The pilot was also useful in determining validity and reliability of the test
items. Cronbach’s alpha analysis was carried out to determine the level of reliability and
validity of then test items. Furthermore expert opinions were sought from the supervisor to
check for reliability.

Hard copy questionnaires were distributed to the respondents during the official working
hours. The study adopted a drop and pick strategy to collect the data. This meant that the
questionnaires were distributed to the respondents for filling and later picked after two days.
The services of a trained research assistant were used to collect data to ensure reliable data is
collected. The respondents were assured of confidentiality of the information provided in the
questionnaires through a written introductory letter to ensure high response rate.

3.6 Data Analysis Method

The tool for data analysis was the Statistical Package for Social Sciences [SPSS]. The data
collected was first coded before entering into the tool. The analysis was both descriptive and
inferential in nature. The descriptive analysis involved calculation of percentages, means and
frequencies.

Calculation of one way analysis of variance was employed to determine the relationship
between the demographic groups and the responses on various variables. Statistical
significance level in form of p values was used to infer findings to the entire population.
Findings were presented using tables and figures.

26
3.7 Chapter Summary

Chapter three discussed the research methodology followed in the study. It discussed the
research design, population and sampling plan, data collection method, research procedure
and data analysis method. Chapter four presents the study findings.

27
 CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 RESULTS AND FINDINGS

4.1 Introduction
Chapter four presents the study findings. Part one of the chapter presents the demographic
characteristics of the population. Part two presents findings on the drivers of global
procurement. Part three presents findings on the global factors affecting the adoption of
global procurement. Part four presents findings on the global procurement strategies adopted
by Nakumatt chain of supermarkets. The last part is a summary of the chapter.

4.2 Demographic Characteristics of the Respondents

4.2.1 Response Rate

Out of the 35 questionnaires which were distributed, 31 of them were duly filled and returned.
This presents 89% response rate as shown in Figure 4.1.

Questionnaires
not returned
11%

Questionnaires
duly filled and
returned
89%

Figure 4.1: Response Rate

4.2.2 Gender
The respondents were asked to indicate their gender. Figure 4.2 shows that majority of the
respondents indicated that they were males [65%] while 35% indicated that they were
females. This shows that the department was dominated by males.

28
 Female
35%
Male
65%

Figure 4.2: Gender of the Respondents

4.2.3 Age Bracket

The respondents were asked to indicate their ages. Figure 4.3 shows that majority of the
respondents were below 30 years of age [63%]. Thirty five percent were aged between 31
and 40 years while those aged above 50 years were only 2%. This shows a predominantly
young workforce.

Above 50 years
2%

31-40 years
35% Below 30
years
63%

Figure 4.3: Age Group

4.2.4 Length of Service at Nakumatt

The respondents were then asked to indicate how long they had worked for Nakumatt
holdings Limited. Figure 4.4 shows 55% of the respondents had served in the organization
for 1 to 5 years, 29% for 6 to 10 years, 10% for more than 10 years and only 6% for less than
1 year. This shows that majority had served in the organization long enough to better
understand the on goings in the organization.

29
 More than 10 Below 1 year
years 6%
10%
6-10
years
29% 1-5 years
55%

Figure 4.4: Length of Service at Nakumatt

4.3.5 Highest Education Level

The study sought to find out the education level of the respondents. Table 4.1 illustrates that
majority of the respondents were Bachelor’s degree holders at 42%, followed by diploma
degree holders at 39%, master’s degree holders at 10% and secondary certificate holders at
10%. Since education opens ones world view, the fact that majority (90.3%) of the
respondents had post-secondary education, would mean that the respondents were more
likely to have better understanding on factors surrounding procurement.

Table 4.1: Highest Education Level

Level Percentage [%]
Secondary 9.7
Diploma 38.7
Bachelor’s degree 41.9
Masters 9.7
Total 100

4.2.6 Management Position

The study then sought to highlight the respondents’ management position. Figure 4.5 shows
45% of the respondents were non-management staff while 42% were in the middle
management category and 13% in the senior management category. The distribution shows a
pyramid organization structure. This was expected since managers tend to be fewer than
those they manage.

30
 Senior
managers
13%

Non
management
45%
Middle level
managers
42%

Figure 4.5: Management Position

4.3 Drivers of Global Procurement

The study analyzed four drivers of global procurement. Cost drivers, Competitive drivers,
Government drivers and Technological drivers. Before the actual analysis, the test item under
each variable was tested for reliability. Reliability co-efficient (Cronbach alpha) was used to
determine reliability of the instrument i.e. was used to determine whether the instrument
consistently measured what it was intended to measure. Cronbach alpha of 0.6 and above was
considered to indicate reliability.

Table 4.2 shows that the Cronbach alpha ranging from 0.662 to 0.876 which registered
acceptability of the instrument. Furthermore the Item-Total Correlation ranges from 0.358 to
0.855 with deletion of any question under each variable [cost, competitive, government,
technology] resulting in a lower Cronbach's alpha. Hence, all the questions improve the
reliability of each core construct and were accepted for analysis.

31
Table 4.2: Cronbach’s Alpha Analysis for Drivers of Global Procurement
Corrected Cronbach's Cronbach's
Alpha
Item-Total Alpha if
Correlation Item
Deleted
Cost Drivers
Economies of scale .407 .620
A huge pool of quality products and qualified .457 .585
suppliers for higher bargaining power 0.662
Low international prices .358 .655
Acceleration of technological innovation .571 .586
Competitive Drivers
Source of competitive innovation .804 .812
Attract the best talents for competitive .646 .873
advantage
0.876
Products of the highest quality .800 .813
Constant supply of goods for competitive .689 .858
advantage
Government Drivers
Market liberalization .585 .813
Favorable government policies .598 .809
Bilateral trade agreements .855 .878 0.826
International quality standards for ease of .614 .806
global procurement
Technology
Product of integrated procurement systems .503 .721
Availability of online payment platforms .390 .780
0.753
Availability of the Internet .667 .630
Mobile technology .667 .623

The analysis then involved describing the findings and calculations of multiple correlations
on the core constructs to draw inferences. In this case each variable was analyzed
individually.

4.3.1 Cost Drivers

Table 4.3 shows that majority agreed [35% agreed; 22% strongly agreed] that global
procurement is driven by cost factors. This is because global procurement provides room for
the buyer to benefit from economies of scale [45% agreed; 19% strongly agreed]; availability
of a huge pool of quality product and qualified suppliers in the global market which offer the

32
buyer bargaining power [37% agreed; 37% strongly agreed]; and the fact that global
procurement accelerate diffusion of technological innovation [39% agreed; 22% strongly
agreed]. Majority disagreed that the global prices are necessarily cheap [29% agreed; 13%
strongly agreed]

Table 4.3: Cost Drivers

Variables Percentages [%] Mean
SDA D N A S
A A
Economies of scale 7 16 13 45 19 3.55
A huge pool of quality products and qualified 3 10 13 37 37 3.93
suppliers
Low international prices 13 29 29 19 10 2.84
Acceleration of technological innovation 0 19 19 39 22 3.65
Summated Scale 6 19 19 35 22 3.49

4.3.2 Competitive drives

Findings in Table 4.4 shows that majority agreed [41% agreed; 36% strongly agreed] that
global procurement is driven by competitive factors. This is because global procurement acts
a source of competitive innovation [36% agreed; 45% strongly agreed]; provide opportunity
for attracting the best talents for competitive advantage [52% agreed; 19% strongly agreed];
provide opportunity to procure products of high quality [32% agreed; 42% strongly agreed];
and ensures constant supply of goods for competitive advantage [42% agreed; 39% strongly
agreed].

Table 4.4: Competitive Drivers

Variables Percentages [%] Mean
SDA DA N A S
A
Source of competitive innovation 0 9 9 36 45 4.16
Attract the best talents 0 9 19 52 19 3.81
Products of the highest quality 0 9 16 32 42 4.06
Constant supply of goods 0 6 13 42 39 4.13
Summated Scale 0 8 14 41 36 4.04

33
4.3.3 Government Drivers

Findings in Table 4.5 shows that majority agreed [38% agreed; 23% strongly agreed] that
global procurement is driven by government factors. This has been promoted by market
liberalization [48% agreed; 23% strongly agreed]; favorable government policies [48%
agreed; 13% strongly agreed]; bilateral trade agreements between countries [32% agreed;
29% strongly agreed]; and adoption of International quality standards by the Kenya for ease
of global procurement [25% agreed; 26% strongly agreed].

Table 4.5: Government Drivers

Variables Percentages [%] Mean
SDA DA N A S
A
Market liberalization 0 16 13 48 23 3.77
Favorable government policies 0 16 22 48 13 3.58
Bilateral trade agreements 3 19 16 32 29 3.65
International quality standards for 3 22 13 25 26 3.58
ease of global procurement
Summated Scale 1 18 16 38 23 3.65

4.3.4 Technology Drivers

The other driver of global procurement is the technological factors as shown in Table 4.6.
Technology has led to integration of procurement systems that facilitate global procurement
[37% agreed; 28% strongly agreed]; availability of online payment platforms [33% agreed;
27% strongly agreed]; availability of the internet [40% agreed; 37% strongly agreed]; and
availability of the mobile telephony system [38% agreed; 26% strongly agreed].

Table 4.6: Technological Drivers

Variables Percentages [%] Mean
SDA DA N A SA
Product of integrated procurement systems 3 13 23 37 23 3.63
Availability of online payment platforms 0 20 20 33 27 3.67
Availability of the Internet 3 7 13 40 37 4.00
Mobile technology 9 3 27 38 26 3.68
Summated Scale 4 11 21 37 28 3.75

34
4.3.5 Ranking of the Drivers of Global Procurement

Out of the variable studied, Table 4.7 shows that competition is the major diver of global
procurement [Mean=4.04] followed by Technology [Mean=3.75]; Government factors
[Mean=3.65] and Cost factors [Mean=3.49].

Table 4.7: Ranking of Drivers of Global Procurement

Core Construct Mean

Competitive Drivers 4.04

Technology Drivers 3.75
Government Drivers 3.65
Cost Drivers 3.49

4.3.6 One Way Analysis of Variance for Drivers of Global Procurement

The study then sought to find out if the findings were in any way influenced by the
management position of an individual or they reflected the general opinion of the entire
population. To identify this, one way analysis of variance was done with the management
level as the constant factor on all the four core constructs. Table 4.8 shows lack statistically
significant [p>0.05] difference in opinion across the different management levels. Therefore
since the study was a census of procurement staff at Nakumatt, the findings were generalised
to the entire population.

Table 4.8: One way Analysis of Variance for Drivers for Global Procurement
Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
Cost drivers Between Groups .943 2 .471 .578 .568
Within Groups 22.024 27 .816
Total 22.967 29
Competitive Between Groups .148 2 .074 .080 .923
drivers Within Groups 25.852 28 .923
Total 26.000 30
Government Between Groups .758 2 .379 .425 .658
drivers Within Groups 24.984 28 .892
Total 25.742 30
Technology Between Groups .043 2 .021 .022 .978
drivers Within Groups 24.064 25 .963
Total 24.107 27

35
Therefore the study established that at Nakumatt, out of the four variables studied,
competition is the major diver of global procurement [Mean=4.04] followed by Technology
[Mean=3.75]; Government factors [Mean=3.65] and Cost factors [Mean=3.49].

4.4 Global Factors That Affect Adoption of Global Procurement

Table 4.9 shows that the Cronbach alpha ranging from 0.651 to 0.866 which registered
acceptability of the instrument. Furthermore the Item-Total Correlation ranges from 0.245 to
0.794 with deletion of any question under each variable except for 0.544 [adverse logical
issues in port clearance] resulting in a lower Cronbach's alpha. Since the reliability of the
core construct was reduced when the question on adverse logistical issues in port clearance
was deleted, it was eliminated from further analysis. All the other 15 questions improved the
reliability of each core construct and were accepted for analysis.

Table 4.9: Cronbach’s Alpha Analysis Factors affecting Global Procurement

Corrected Cronbach's Cronbach's
Item-Total Alpha if Item Alpha
Correlation Deleted
Currency Fluctuations
High currency exchange rates .526 .523
Changes in exchange rates .245 .706
0.651
Loss of purchasing power of the local currency .457 .565
Instability of the local currency .525 .574
Complicated Logistics
Adverse logistical issues in port clearance .794 .544*
High cost of logistics .383 .785
0.755
Longer inventory management process .447 .751
Poor handling of return goods and containers .616 .663
Tariffs and non-Tariff Barriers
Unreasonable demand on standards and quality
.595 .855
of imported goods from state agents
Bureaucratic delays at the custom .730 .798 0.852
Road blocks and barriers .794 .797
High tariffs levied on imports .665 .824
Culture and Language Differences
Instability of the relationship between my
.679 .843
organization and import suppliers
Language barriers and business transactions .763 .810 0.866
Miscommunication .776 .803
Different cultures and procurement processes .654 .852

36
4.4.1 Currency Fluctuations
Table 4.10 shows that majority agreed [31% agreed; 20% strongly agreed] that currency
fluctuation is a one of the factors that affect global procurement at Nakumatt. The challenge
is caused by high currency exchange rates [39% agreed; 19% strongly agreed]; loss of
purchasing power of the local currency [27% agreed; 30% strongly agreed] and instability of
the local currency [33% agreed; 17% strongly agreed]. However close to a third of the
respondents were neutral as to the effect of changes in the exchange rate [27%]

Table 4.10: Currency Fluctuations

Variables Percentages [%] Mean
SDA DA N A SA
High currency exchange rates 3 16 22 39 19 3.55
Changes in exchange rates 10 27 27 23 13 3.03
Loss of purchasing power of the local 7 13 23 27 30 3.60
currency
Instability of the local currency 7 27 17 33 17 3.27
Summated Scale 7 21 22 31 20 3.36

4.4.2 Complicated Logistics

Table 4.11 shows that majority agreed [42% agreed; 11% strongly agreed] that complicated
logistics offers a challenge to global procurement at Nakumatt. The challenge is caused by
high cost of logistics [50% agreed]; longer inventory management process [40% agreed; 20%
strongly agreed] and poor handling of return goods and containers [37% agreed; 13%
strongly agreed].

Table 4.11: Complicated Logistics

Variables Percentages [%] Mean
SDA DA N A S
A
High cost of logistics 13 20 17 50 0 3.03
Longer inventory management process 0 23 17 40 20 3.57
Poor handling of return goods and 7 17 27 37 13 3.33
containers
Summated Scale 7 20 20 42 11 3.31

37
4.4.3 Tariff and Non-Tariff Barriers

Table 4.12 shows that majority agreed [33% agreed; 17% strongly agreed] that tariffs and
non-tariff barriers offers a challenge to global procurement at Nakumatt. The challenge is
caused by bureaucratic delays at the custom [30% agreed; 17% strongly agreed]; Road
blocks and barriers [37% agreed; 17% strongly agreed]; High tariffs levied on imports [40%
agreed; 17% strongly agreed]. Majority were neutral as to the effect of unreasonable demand
on standards and quality of imported goods from state agents [40% agreed; 40% disagreed]

Table 4.12: Tariff and Non-Tariff Barriers

Variables Percentages [%] Mean
SDA DA N A SA
Unreasonable demand on standards and 13 27 20 23 17 3.03
quality of imported goods from state
agents
Bureaucratic delays at the custom 7 23 23 30 17 3.27
Road blocks and barriers 10 27 10 37 17 3.23
High tariffs levied on imports 10 13 20 40 17 3.40
Summated Scale 8 23 18 33 17 3.23

4.4.4 Culture and Language Differences

Table 4.13 shows that 40% disagreed that culture and language difference presents a
challenge to global procurement at Nakumatt. On the other side 42% agreed that the same
offers a challenge. With 19% scoring neutral, the situation presents lack of clear position held
by the respondents on the effects of different culture and languages to global procurement at
Nakumatt. This is further asserted by an average mean of 3.065.

Table 4.13: Culture and Language Barriers

Variables Percentages [%] Mean
SDA DA N A SA
Instability of the relationship between my 10 30 17 33 10 3.03
organization and import suppliers
Language barriers and business transactions 17 27 17 23 17 2.97
Miscommunication 10 30 20 27 13 3.03
Different cultures and processes 0 37 20 27 17 3.23
Summated Scale 9 31 19 28 14 3.065
4.4.5 Ranking of Factors that Affect Global Procurement

38
Out of the variable studied, Table 4.14 shows that currency fluctuations [Mean=3.36]
presents the major challenge followed by complicated logistics [Mean=3.31], tariffs and non-
tariff barriers [Mean=3.23] and culture and language barriers [Mean=3.07].

Table 4.14 Ranking of Factors that Affect Global Procurement

Core Construct Mean

Currency Fluctuations 3.36

Complicated Logistics 3.31
Tariffs and non-tariffs barrier 3.23
Culture and Language Differences 3.07

4.4.6 One Way Analysis of Variance for Factors Affecting Global Procurement
The study then sought to find out if the findings were in any way influenced by the
management position of an individual or they reflected the general opinion of the entire
population. Table 4.15 shows lack statistically significant [p>0.05] difference in opinion
across the different management levels. Therefore since the study was a census of
procurement staff at Nakumatt, the findings were generalised to the entire population.

Table 4.15: One way Analysis of Variance for Factors Affecting Global Procurement
Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
Currency Between Groups 3.771 2 1.886 2.358 .114
fluctuations Within Groups 21.595 27 .800
Total 25.367 29
Complicated Between Groups 2.705 2 1.352 3.149 .059
Logistics Within Groups 11.595 27 .429
Total 14.300 29
Tariffs and non Between Groups 3.250 2 1.625 1.333 .281
tariffs Within Groups 32.917 27 1.219
Total 36.167 29
Culture and Between Groups .038 2 .019 .014 .986
language Within Groups 36.929 27 1.368
differences Total 36.967 29

Therefore the study showed that out of the four variables studied, currency fluctuations
[Mean=3.36] presents the major challenge followed by complicated logistics [Mean=3.31],
tariffs and non-tariff barriers [Mean=3.23] and culture and language barriers [Mean=3.07].

39
4.5 Global Procurement Strategies

Table 4.16 shows that the Cronbach alpha ranging from 0.826 to 0.907 which registered
acceptability of the instrument. Furthermore the Item-Total Correlation ranges from 0.380 to
0.878 with deletion of any question under each variable except for [Access to several means
of transport and Similar systems] resulting in a lower Cronbach's alpha. Since the reliability
of the core construct was reduced by two questions, they were eliminated from further
analysis. All the other 16 questions improved the reliability of each core construct and were
accepted for analysis.

Table 4.16: Cronbach’s Alpha Analysis for Global Procurement Strategies

Corrected Cronbach's Cronbach's
Item-Total Alpha if Alpha
Correlation Item Deleted
Low Labor Cost and Quality Standards
Lowest production labor cost .695 .762
Least cost on forwarding services .635 .788
0.826
Low Agency cost .586 .810
Reputation for quality products .704 .755
Good Transport System
Transport cost .380 .864
Transport networks .566 .815
Access to several means of transport .803 .749* 0.831
Access for spot-checks of the supplier’s facility .681 .782
Access the market on the ground
.764 .765
Good Human Rights Records and Rule of
Law
Full of democracies .693 .902
How employees who make the products are
.819 .874
treated 0.907
Human rights records .670 .907
Level of state corruption .845 .872
Records on the rule of law .824 .874
Same Language and culture
Same culture .751 .776
Language .756 .774 0.847
Similar systems .878 .720*
Training of employees on foreign languages .394 .917

40
4.5.1 Low Labor Cost and Quality Standards

Table 4.10 shows that majority agreed [28% agreed; 27% strongly agreed] that Nakumatt has
adopted low cost and quality standards a global procuring strategies. The firm sources its
goods from countries with lowest production labor cost [27% agreed; 33% strongly agreed];
least cost on forwarding services [23% agreed; 20% strongly agreed], low agency cost [33%
agreed; 23% strongly agreed] and from countries with reputation for quality products [27%
agreed; 30% strongly agreed].

Table 4.17: Low Labor and Quality Standards

Variables Percentages [%] Mean
SDA DA N A SA
Lowest production labor cost 10 13 17 27 33 3.60
Least cost on forwarding services 3 23 30 23 20 3.33
Low Agency cost 0 17 27 33 23 3.63
Reputation for quality products 3 20 20 27 30 3.60
Summated Scale 4 18 24 28 27 3.54

4.5.2 Good Transport Systems

Further, Table 4.18 in comparison to those who disagreed, majority agreed [23% agreed;
23% strongly agreed] Nakumatt consider availability of good transport system when sourcing
goods from foreign countries. The firm looks at the transport cost [23% agreed; 30% strongly
agreed]; access to spots-checks of supplier’s facilities [17% agreed; 31% strongly agreed]
and access to the market on the ground to learn of any competitive threats or supplier knock-
offs [24% agreed; 24% strongly agreed]. However majority were neutral as to whether the
firms considers transport networks [43%]

Table 4.18: Good Transport System

Variables Percentages [%] Mean
SDA DA N A S
A
Transport cost 7 17 23 23 30 3.53
Transport networks 10 13 43 27 7 3.07
Access to supplier’s facility 10 24 17 17 31 3.34
Access the market on the ground 10 24 17 24 24 3.28
Summated Scale 9 20 25 23 23 3.30

41
4.5.3 Good Human Rights Records and Rule of Law

Table 4.19 shows that comparing those who agreed versus those who disagreed, majority
agreed [26% agreed; 16% strongly agreed] Nakumatt considers good human rights records
and the rule of law while sourcing goods from foreign countries. The firm prefers sourcing
goods from countries managed democratically [20% agreed; 20% strongly agreed]; the firm
considers how the employees who make the products are treated [24% agreed; 14% strongly
agreed], the firm considers human rights records [27% agreed; 13% strongly agreed],
considers the level of state corruption [30% agreed; 20% strongly agreed] and records on the
rule of law [27% agreed; 13% strongly agreed].

Table 4.19: Good Human Rights Records and Rule of Law

Variables Percentages [%] Mean
SDA DA N A SA
Full of democracies 10 17 33 20 20 3.23
How employees who make the 17 14 31 24 14 3.03
products are treated
Human rights records 13 20 27 27 13 3.07
Level of state corruption 3 13 33 30 20 3.50
Records on the rule of law 7 23 30 27 13 3.17
Summated Scale 7 17 31 26 16 3.2

4.5.4 Same Language and Culture

On the contrary, the study showed that the respondents disagreed that Nakumatt only focuses
on sourcing goods from countries with same language and culture [32% disagreed; 18%
strongly disagreed] as indicated in Table 4.20. They disagreed that Nakumatt only focuses on
countries with same culture [27% disagreed; 23% strongly disagreed]; same language [37%
disagreed; 17% strongly disagreed]; and that they training of employees on foreign languages
[33% disagreed; 13% strongly disagreed].

42
Table 4.20: Same Language and Culture
Variables Percentages [%] Mean
SDA DA N A SA
Same culture 23 27 13 20 17 2.80
Language 17 37 10 23 13 2.80
Training of employees on foreign languages 13 33 23 13 17 2.87
Summated Scale 18 32 15 19 17 2.82

4.5.5 Ranking of Strategies of Global Procurement

Out of the four variables tested, Table 4.21 shows low labor and quality of standards is the
main procurement strategies used at Nakumatt [Mean=3.54] followed by good transport
systems [Mean=3.30] and good human rights records and the rule of law [Mean=3.20] while
same culture and language is not used as global procurement strategy at Nakumatt
[Mean=2.82].

Table 4.21: Ranking of Strategies of Global Procurement

Core Construct Mean

Low labor and quality standards 3.54

Good transport system 3.30
Good human rights records and rule of law 3.20
Same language and culture 2.82

4.5.6 One Way Analysis of Variance for Strategies for Global Procurement

The study then sought to find out if the findings were in any way influenced by the
management position of an individual or they reflected the general opinion of the entire
population. Table 4.22 shows lack statistically significant [p>0.05] difference in opinion
across the different management levels. Therefore since the study was a census of
procurement staff at Nakumatt, the findings were generalised to the entire population.

43
Table 4.22: One way Analysis of Variance for Strategies for Global Procurement
Sum of df Mean F Sig.
Squares Square
Low Between 3.193 2 1.596 1.336 .280
labour Groups
cost
Within Groups 32.274 27 1.195
Total 35.467 29
Good Between .015 2 .008 .007 .993
transport Groups
system
Within Groups 28.744 26 1.106
Total 28.759 28
Human Between .102 2 .051 .046 .955
rights Groups
records
Within Groups 28.588 26 1.100
Total 28.690 28
Same Between 2.702 2 1.351 .924 .409
Languag Groups
e and
culture Within Groups 39.464 27 1.462
Total 42.167 29

4.6 Chapter Summary

The chapter presented the findings of the study. Section one of the study was the
introduction. Section two covered the demographic characteristics, sections three; four and
five gave the findings of the three independent variables. Chapter five covers the study
summary, discussions, conclusions and recommendations in line with the research questions.

44
 CHAPTER FIVE

5.0 DISCUSSIONS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Introduction
The purpose of the study was to determine the effects of globalization on procurement at
Nakumatt chain of supermarkets. Chapter five presents the study summary, discussions,
conclusions and recommendations.

5.2 Summary
The purpose of the study was to determine the effects of globalization on procurement. The
study adopted as case study research design approach. The study was guided by the
following research questions. What are the drivers of global procurement at Nakumatt
Holdings Limited? What are the global factors that affect the adoption of global procurement
at Nakumatt Holdings Limited? What are the global procurement strategies at Nakumatt
Holdings Limited? The study was descriptive and quantitative in nature. The scope of the
study was limited to the procurement department at Nakumatt headquarters in Nairobi. The
primary data collection was carried out in the month of June 2015. Since the study focused
only on the procurement department, census of the 35 procurement staff at Nakumatt
headquarters in Nairobi was carried out. The analysis was both descriptive and inferential in
nature. The descriptive analysis involved calculation of percentages, means and frequencies.
Analysis of variance was employed to determine the relationship between the demographic
groups and the dependent variables. Statistical significance level in form of p values was
used to infer findings to the entire population. Findings were presented using tables and
figures.

The first study objective sought to identify the drivers of global procurement at Nakumatt.
The study established that at Nakumatt, out of the four variables studied, competition is the
major diver of global procurement [Mean=4.04] followed by Technology [Mean=3.75];
Government factors [Mean=3.65] and Cost factors [Mean=3.49]. The competitive drivers
arise in the sense that global procurement acts a source of competitive innovation [81%
agreed]; provide opportunity for attracting the best talents for competitive advantage [71%
agreed]; provide opportunity to procure products of high quality [74% agreed]; and ensures
45
constant supply of goods for competitive advantage [81% agreed]. Technology drivers are
through the integration of procurement systems that facilitate global procurement [65%
agreed]; availability of online payment platforms [60% agreed]; availability of the internet
[77% agreed]; and availability of the mobile telephony system [64% agreed]. Government
drivers are through market liberalization [71% agreed]; favorable government policies [61%
agreed]; bilateral trade agreements between Kenya and other countries [61% agreed]; and
adoption of International quality standards by the Kenya for ease of global procurement
[51% agreed].The cost drivers are economies of scale at the global market [64% agreed];
availability of a huge pool of quality product and qualified suppliers in the global market
which offer the buyer bargaining power [74% agreed]; and the fact that global procurement
accelerate diffusion of technological innovation [61% agreed].

The second study objective sought to identify the factors that influence the global
procurement. The study showed that out of the four variables studied, currency fluctuations
[Mean=3.36] presents the major challenge followed by complicated logistics [Mean=3.31],
tariffs and non-tariff barriers [Mean=3.23] and culture and language barriers [Mean=3.07].
Majority indicated that the challenge of currency fluctuations is caused by high currency
exchange rates [58% agreed]; loss of purchasing power of the local currency [57% agreed]
and instability of the local currency [50% agreed]. The challenge of complicated logistics is
caused by high cost of logistics [50% agreed]; longer inventory management process [60%
agreed] and poor handling of return goods and containers [50% agreed]. The challenge of
tariffs and non-tariff barriers is caused by bureaucratic delays at the custom [47% agreed];
Road blocks and barriers [54% agreed]; High tariffs levied on imports [57% agreed]. For
culture and different languages, 40% disagreed, 42% agreed and 19% scored neutral that
culture and language difference presents a challenge to global procurement at Nakumatt. This
presents lack of clear position held by the respondents.

Finally the third research question sought to identify global procurement strategies employed
at Nakumatt. The study showed that out of the four variables tested, low labor and quality of
standards is the main procurement strategies used at Nakumatt [Mean=3.54] followed by
good transport systems [Mean=3.30] and good human rights records and the rule of law
[Mean=3.20]. Majority indicated that the firm sources its goods from countries with lowest

46
production labor cost [60% agreed]; least cost on forwarding services [43% agreed], low
agency cost [56% agreed] and from countries with reputation for quality products [57%
agreed].Secondly, the firm looks at the transport cost [53% agreed]; access to spots-checks of
supplier’s facilities [48% agreed] and access to the market on the ground to learn of any
competitive threats or supplier knock-offs [48% agreed]. However majority were neutral as
to whether the firm considers transport networks [43%]. Third, majority indicated that the
firm prefers sourcing goods from countries managed democratically [60% agreed]; the firm
considers how the employees who make the products are treated [38% agreed], the firm
considers human rights records [40% agreed, considers the level of state corruption [50%
agreed] and records on the rule of law [40% agreed].

5.3 Discussions
5.3.1 Drivers of Global Procurement

The first study objective sought to identify the drivers of global procurement at Nakumatt.
The study established that at Nakumatt, out of the four variables studied, competition is the
major driver of global procurement. The competitive drivers arise in the sense that global
procurement acts a source of competitive innovation; provide opportunity for attracting the
best talents for competitive advantage; provide opportunity to procure products of high
quality; and ensures constant supply of goods for competitive advantage. These findings are
in line with arguments by Geiersbach (2010), that intensification of competition at both
domestic and international levels has driven firms to look beyond their domestic markets for
new opportunities. The position is further supported by Jiang and Tian (2010) who indicated
that global sourcing has been considered by more and more enterprises as positive strategic
activity under the pressures from global competition. Mwangi (2013) further asserts that
one of the specific drivers of global procurement is the product quality based competition

The second are the technology drivers. Technology drivers are through the integration of
procurement systems that facilitate global procurement; availability of online payment
platforms; availability of the internet; and availability of the mobile telephony system. The
finding supports earlier arguments by McIntosh and Sloan (2001) that technology especially
the internet assist in opening a company up to a global market. They indicate that this
technology makes it easy for organizations to search for overseas suppliers capable of

47
satisfying their needs. Thus, technology helps an organization achieve efficient use of world-
wide human connection to achieve efficient procurement. This further supports assertion by
Otieno, Muthoni and Simon (2013) that in procurement, technology aims at creating
efficiencies i.e. to make the traditional purchasing procedures more efficient and cost
effective.

The third are the Government drivers. Government drivers are through market liberalization;
favorable government policies; bilateral trade agreements between Kenya and other countries;
and adoption of International quality standards by the Kenya for ease of global procurement.
This is in line with the sentiment by Anderson and Kovacic (2009) that the role of
government in facilitating or creating barriers for international trade cannot be under
estimated. They indicated that the government role is critical in the positively influencing
free trade through agreements that create a framework that aims at establishing global
economic development via liberalizing global trade. Further, the findings support arguments
that the discriminatory government procurement makes states worse of in the long run
because it leads to inefficient allocation of resources and limits the benefits stemming from
free trade. Instigators of these policies fail to realise the benefits from liberalized
procurement such as access to other markets, support for liberalizing countries’ own markets,
increased competition that leads to increased (international) competitiveness, job creation
and budgetary savings (Kattel & Lember, 2010). Chou (2006), noted that Government
support for global trade arises where the country abides by a set of rules for liberalizing the
economy and relaxing state control over foreign trade and investment. He adds lowering of
transaction costs and reduced bureaucratic units.

Fourth are the Cost drivers. The cost drivers are availability of economies of scale at the
global market; availability of a huge pool of quality product and qualified suppliers in the
global market which offer the buyer bargaining power; and the fact that global procurement
accelerate diffusion of technological innovation. The element of cost is linked to the
arguments by Hultman, Hertz, Johnsen and Johnsen (2012) that affordability through low
cost is at the core of any company’s business idea. They assert that under increasing
pressures to reduce costs, companies have shifted, and continue to shift, sourcing from local
suppliers to low cost country-based suppliers (Hultman, Hertz, Johnsen, & Johnsen, 2012).

48
The findings also support earlier findings by Nyanchoka and Namusonge (2014) who
indicated that even though there is a continuing push for economies of scale, it is evident that
in Kenya, suppliers have not yet been able to produce machinery and other agricultural inputs
at economical costs which increases the cost of product development relative to market life
hence the drive to source internationally where there is a huge pool of qualified suppliers.

5.3.2 Factors Affecting Global Procurement

The second study objective sought to identify the factors that influence the global
procurement. The study showed that out of the four variables studied, currency fluctuation is
the major challenge. Majority indicated that the challenge of currency fluctuations is caused
by high currency exchange rates; loss of purchasing power of the local currency and
instability of the local currency. The findings support works by Kandil, Berument and Dincer
(2007) who indicated that a depreciation (or devaluation) of the domestic currency may
stimulate economic activity within the country through the initial increase in the price of
foreign goods relative to home goods. This means that exchange rate depreciation diverts
spending from foreign goods to domestic goods. A fact which directly affects procuring of
goods from outside the country and the reverse is true. Further the findings are in line with
Coric and Pugh (2010) who linked the increased exchange rate fluctuations to negative
effects on international trade. Another empirical study to try and determine the effects of
exchange rate volatility on export flows for South American countries by (Serenis, 2013)
showed an adverse relationship between exports and exchange volatility.

Second is the complicated logistics. The challenge of complicated logistics is caused by high
cost of logistics; longer inventory management process and poor handling of return goods
and containers. This is in line with Zeng and Rossetti (2003) assertion that llogistics
processes form the critical loops of supply chains and oversee the flows of materials,
information and cash, which are the essential elements of fulfilling customers’ orders. They
continue that as greater distances, currencies and cultures separate markets, suppliers and
manufacturers, logistics plays a more critical role in the success of the supply chains.
Therefore the role played by transportation and logistics excellence in achieving a world-
class supply chain cannot be ignored. The finding also supports a study by Msimangira and
Tesha (2009) which identified logistics challenges of coping with long supply chains as one

49
of the problems affecting global procurement systems. They assert that different countries
employ different existing transportation and logistics structural methods which creates
complexity in global logistics. A fact supported by Jiang and Tian (2010) who indicated that
logistics in global sourcing is prone to transportation delays, border-crossing procedures and
longer inventory management.

Third are the tariffs and non-tariff barriers. The challenge of tariffs and non-tariff barriers is
caused by bureaucratic delays at the custom; Road blocks and barriers; and high tariffs levied
on imports. This is in line with Okumu and Nyankori (2010) who posited that globally, tariffs
have been declining as a result of multilateral, regional and bilateral trade liberalization but
despite this, many countries have instituted alternative protectionist mechanisms, non trade
barriers, which are ever changing and are threatening international free flow of goods and
services (Nathan Associates, 2013). The findings are also in line with Cottier and Oesch
(2011) assertion that tariffs and taxes have been touted as the classical methods for
establishing discrimination in international imports and exports.Tariffs are inherently
discriminatory as they privilege domestically produced and sold goods.

Fourth, the study showed that the respondents were neutral as to the effect of culture and
language barriers on global procurement at Nakumatt. This finding fails to approve or
disapprove the notion by Jiang and Tian (2010) that because the suppliers under the
international purchasing come from different parts of the world, they hold various models,
standards, and cultures. They assumed that this scenerio would present a problem to these
firms which source good globally. They proposed standardized criteria and conditions in
order to select dependable suppliers. This is further acknowledge by Hultman, Hertz, Johnsen
and Johnsen (2012) who indicated that using the knowledge from markets with similar
features in terms of, for example, language and culture facilitated expansion of sourcing
markets.

5.3.3 Strategies for Global Procurement

Finally the third research question sought to identify global procurement strategies employed
at Nakumatt. The study showed that out of the four variables tested, low labor and quality of
standards is the main procurement strategies used at Nakumatt. Majority indicated that the

50
firm sources its goods from countries with lowest production labor cost; least cost on
forwarding services, low agency cost and from countries with reputation for quality products.
This supports arguments by Öztürk (2012) that today’s competitive global markets,
consumers look for the highest quality products at the lowest prices, regardless of where they
are produced. He continues that this trend is continuously increasing the significance of
global markets and forcing enterprises to analyze the available alternatives as they seek to
remain competitive e.g. by managing their costs to gain competitive advantages. The study is
further in line with , Lanza, Weiler and Vogt (2009) observation that, with the growing
competition both in the domestic and global markets, competitive prices are the precondition
for gaining market shares in the domestic market as well as abroad. The findings also support
a study by Mwikali and Kavale (2012) which sought to determine factors affecting the
selection of optimal suppliers in procurement management. The study identified quality of
the product as a major creterion in selection of global and local suppliers.

Secondly Nakumatt also considers availability of good infrastructure and transport systems.
The firm looks at the transport cost; access to spots-checks of supplier’s facilities and access
to the market on the ground to learn of any competitive threats or supplier knock-offs. The
finding support assertion by Ślusarczyk (2010) that without a doubt transport is an
indispensable part of international trade. He notes that it provides vital distribution for
production, as well as essential personal mobility, directly interconnecting businesses to
worldwide markets and the global procurement would be meaningless without the ability to
move goods and people around the planet. This is further support by a World Trade
Organization (2013) report which indicated how factors related to transport directly
influences whether a market is accessible or not for international procurement of goods and
services. The report identified geographical features of countries, the quantity and quality of
the physical infrastructure that support transportation services, the procedures and formalities
used to control the movement of goods from one country to another, the extent of
competition in the transportation sector, the pace of technological innovation in the sector
and the cost of fuel as the major factors that influence transportation system and cost of
transport.

51
Third good human rights records and the rule of law determines whether Nakumatt sources
from a country or not. Majority indicated that the firm prefers sourcing goods from countries
managed democratically; the firm considers how the employees who make the products are
treated; the firm considers human rights records, the level of state corruption and records on
the rule of law. If these elements are unfavorable, then Nakumatt won’t source goods from
that particular country. The finding shows that Nakumatt appreciates the need for respecting
human rights. This is in line with Lindsay, McCorquodale, Blecher, Bonnitcha, Crockett and
Sheppard (2013) who indicated that business enterprises should respect human rights and
should avoid infringing on the human rights of others and should address adverse human
rights impacts with which they are involved.

5.4 Conclusions
5.4.1 Drivers of Global Procurement

The first study objective sought to identify the drivers of global procurement at Nakumatt.
The study established that at Nakumatt, out of the four variables studied, competition is the
major diver of global procurement. The competitive drivers arise in the sense that global
procurement acts a source of competitive innovation; provide opportunity for attracting the
best talents for competitive advantage; provide opportunity to procure products of high
quality; and ensures constant supply of goods for competitive advantage.

The second are the technology drivers. Technology drivers are through the integration of
procurement systems that facilitate global procurement; availability of online payment
platforms; availability of the internet; and availability of the mobile telephony system. The
third are the Government drivers. Government drivers are through market liberalization;
favorable government policies; bilateral trade agreements between Kenya and other countries;
and adoption of International quality standards by the Kenya for ease of global procurement.
Fourth are the Cost drivers. The cost drivers are as a result of the availability of economies of
scale at the global market; availability of a huge pool of quality product and qualified
suppliers in the global market which offer the buyer bargaining power; and the fact that
global procurement accelerate diffusion of technological innovation.

52
5.4.2 Factors Affecting Global Procurement

The second study objective sought to identify the factors that influence the global
procurement. The study showed that out of the four variables studied, currency fluctuations
are the major challenge. Majority indicated that the challenge of currency fluctuations is
caused by high currency exchange rates; loss of purchasing power of the local currency and
instability of the local currency. Second is the complicated logistics. The challenge of
complicated logistics is caused by high cost of logistics; longer inventory management
process and poor handling of return goods and containers.

Third are the tariffs and non-tariff barriers. The challenge of tariffs and non-tariff barriers is
caused by bureaucratic delays at the custom; Road blocks and barriers; and high tariffs levied
on imports. Fourth, the study showed that the respondents were neutral as to the effect of
culture and language barriers on global procurement at Nakumatt.

5.4.3 Strategies for Global Procurement

Finally the third research question sought to identify global procurement strategies employed
at Nakumatt. The study showed that out of the four variables tested, low labor and quality of
standards is the main procurement strategies used at Nakumatt. Majority indicated that the
firm sources its goods from countries with lowest production labor cost; least cost on
forwarding services, low agency cost and from countries with reputation for quality products.
Secondly Nakumatt also considers availability of good infrastructure and transport systems.
The firm looks at the transport cost; access to spots-checks of supplier’s facilities and access
to the market on the ground to learn of any competitive threats or supplier knock-offs.

Third good human rights records and the rule of law determines whether Nakumatt sources
from a country or not. Majority indicated that the firm prefers sourcing goods from countries
managed democratically; the firm considers how the employees who make the products are
treated; the firm considers human rights records, the level of state corruption and records on
the rule of law. If these elements are unfavorable, then Nakumatt won’t source goods from
that particular country.

53
5.5 Recommendations
5.5.1 Recommendations for Improvement

5.5.1.1 Drivers of Global Procurement

It is in no doubt human resource plays a critical role in global procurement. As a strategic

measure, the organization should ensure that in the event of global procurement, the key staff
members need constant training and exposure to other global markets to expand their ability.
The training should position the procurement staff to execute their roles efficiently and be the
pillar to drive the organization’s global procurement agenda.

5.5.1.2 Factors Affecting Global Procurement

Currency fluctuation has been identified as the major factor that affects global procurement
at Nakumatt. This challenge can be addressed by putting in measures such hedging to safe
guard against the fluctuation. Furthermore the issue of complicated logistics can be addressed
by outsourcing of procurement service to firms with the greatest capabilities in global
procurement.

5.5.1.3 Strategies for Global Procurement

Nakumatt should ensure that it is constantly monitoring and controlling its global
procurement activities; constantly forecasting demand against lead times and costs; and
investing in good relation with its service providers since these relationships may in the long
run adversely affect the organization’s global procurement performance.

5.5.2 Recommendations for Further Studies

This study was done in relation to the effect of globalization on procurement at Nakumatt
holdings limited. Therefore, there is need for further research on the other supermarket
chains in Kenya to draw sector wise conclusion.

54
 REFERENCES
Ahmer, Z. (2013). Adoption of Human Resource Information Systems Innovation in
Pakistani Organizations . Journal of Quality and Technology Management , 9 (2), 25-
50.

Alam, S. S., Ali, M. Y., & Jani, M. F. (2011). An empirical study of factors affecting
electronic commerce adoption among SMEs in Malaysia. Journal of Business
Economics and Management , 12 (2), 375–399.

Al-Jabri, I. M., & Sohail, M. S. (2012). Mobile Banking Adoption: Application of

Diffusion of Innovation Theory. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research , 13 (4),
379-391.

Anderson, R. D., & Kovacic, W. E. (2009). Competition Policy and International Trade
Liberalisation: Essential Complements to Ensure Good Performance in Public
Procurement Markets. Thomson Reuters (Legal) Limited and Contributors , 2, 67-101.

Barba-Sánchez, Pilar, M. d., & Jiménez-Zarco, I. (2007). Drivers, Benefits and Challenges
of ICT Adoption by Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs): A Literature Review .
Problems and Perspectives in Management , 5 (1), 103-114.

Bazurli, R., Cucciniello, M., Mele, V., & Nasi, G. (2014). Determinants and Barriers of
Adoption, Diffusion and Upscaling of ICT-driven Social Innovation in the Public
Sector. EGPA Conference September 10-12 , 2014, (pp. 1-55). Speyer, Germany.

Blanche, T., Durrheim, K., & Painter, D. (Eds.). (2006). Research in practice. Cape Town,
SA: UCT Press.

Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of

information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the
literature. International Journal of Education and Development using Information
and Communication Technology , 8 (1), 136-155.

Byrne, E. F. (2014). Towards Enforceable Bans on Illicit Businesses: From Moral

Relativism to Human Rights. Journal of Business Ethics , 119–130.

55
Carter, J. R., Maltz, A., Yan, T., & Maltz, E. (2008). How procurement managers view low
cost countries and geographies-A perceptual mapping approach. International Journal of
Physical Distribution & Logistics Management , 33 (3), 224-243.

Chapman, C. S., & Kihn, L. A. (2009). Information system integration, enabling control and
performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society , 34 (2), 151-169.

Chigona, W., & Licker, P. (2008). Using Diffusion of Innovations Framework to Explain
Communal Computing Facilities Adoption Among the Urban Poor. Information
Technologies and International Development , 4 (3), 57–73.

Chou, B. K. (2006). China’s Economic Integration into Global Regulatory Frameworks: A

Study of Government Procurement. Communist and Post-Communist Studies , 39 (4),
431-445.

Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, G. J. (2008). Business Research Methods (9th ed.). New
York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Coric, B., & Pugh, G. (2010). The Effect of Exchange Rate Variability on International
Trade: A Meta-Regression Analysis. Applied Economics , 42 (20), 2631- 2644.

Cottier, T., & Oesch, M. (2011). Direct and Indirect Discrimination in WTO Law and EU
Law. Working Paper No 2011/16 . Swiss National Centre on Competence Research.

Council of Logistics Management. (1991). Definition of Logistics. Retrieved March 30,

2015, from http://www.cscmp.org/

Di Pietro, L., Di Virgilio, F., & Pantano, E. (2012). Social network for the choice of
tourist destination:Attitude and behavioural intention. Journal of Hospitality and
Tourism Technology , 3 (1).

Doanh, N. K., & Heo, Y. (2007). A Comparative Study of the Trade Barriers in Vietnam and
Thailand. International Area Review , 10 (1), 239-266.

Dzogbenuku, R. K. (2013). Banking Innovation in Ghana: Insight of Students’ Adoption and

Doffusion. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce , 18 (3), 1-20.

56
Fishbein, H., & Ajzen, A. (2005). Information and Communication Technology Policy in
Rwanda. Case Study. Kigali, Rwanda.

Frank, A. G. (1988). ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley, CA: University
of Califonia Press.

Gakure, R., & Ngumi, P. (2013). Do bank innovations influence profitability of

commercial banks in Kenya? Prime Journal of Social Science , 2 (3), 237-248.

Gallardo, H. L., Lachlan, K. L., & Davis, C. S. (2012). Straight Talk about
Communication Research Methods. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall Hunt Publishing.

Garson, C. (2012). Sampling. Raleigh, NC: Satatistical Associates Publishing.

Geiersbach, N. (2010). The Impact of International Business on the Global Economy.

Business Intelligence Journal , 3 (2), 119-129.

Groenewald, T. (2004). A Phenomenological Research Design Illustrated. International

Journal of Qualitative Methods , 3 (1), 1-26.

Hamilton, L., & Webster, P. (2009). The International Business Enviroment. New York:
Oxford Univeristy Press.

Harris, L., & Brown, G. (2010). Mixing Interview and Questionnaire Methods: Practical
Problem in Aligning Data. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation , 15 (1),
1-19.

Harris, L., & Brown, G. (2010). Mixing Interview and Questionnaire Methods: Practical
Problem in Aligning Data. Practical Assessment. Research and Evaluation , 15 (1),
1-19.

Harwell, M. (2011). Research design in qualitative/quantitative/mixed methods. In C.

Conrad, & R. Serlin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook for research in education:
Pursuing ideas as the keystone of exemplary inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 147-165).
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

57
Hasan, R., & Alim, M. A. (2010). Factors Affecting Supply Chain Management Efficiency
in Cross Border Outsourcing: A case study of H&M and its Outsourcing Operations
in Bangladesh. Masters Thesis, School of Business, Economic and Law. University of
Gothenburg . University of Gothenburg.

Herrmann, A. (2012). Globalization and its Effect on International Business. Global

Awareness Society International 21st Annual Conference - New York City, May
2012.

Hill, S. R., & Troshani, I. (2010). Factors Influencing Adoption of Personalisation Mobile
Services: Evidence from Young Australians. International Journal of Mobile
Communications , 8 (2), 150-168.

Hirunyawipada, T., & Paswan, A. (2006). ConsumerInnovativeness and Perceived Risk:

Implications for High Technology Product Adoption. Journal of Consumer
Marketing , 23, 182-198.

Huang, L.-Y., Hsieh, Y.-J., & Chang, S. E. (2011). The Effects of Consumer
Innovativeness on Adoption of Location Based Services. Review of Global
Management and Service Science , 1, 17-31.

Hultman, J., Hertz, S., Johnsen, R., & Johnsen, T. (2012). Global Sourcing Development at
IKEA – a Case Study. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management , 18 (1), 9-21.

Hung, S.-Y., Chen, C. C., Hung, H.-M., & Ho, W.-W. (2013). Critical Factors Predicting
The Acceptance of Digital Museums: User and System Perspectives. Journal of
Electronic Commerce Research , 4 (3), 231-243.

Hussein, I. M., & Shale, I. .. (2014). Effects of Sustainable Procurement Practices on

Organizational Performance In Manufacturing Sector In Kenya: A Case of
Unilever Kenya Limited. European Journal of Business Management , 1 (11),
417-438.

58
Hyett, N., Kenny, A., & Dickson-Swift, V. (2014). Methodology or method? A critical
review of qualitative case study reports. International Journal of Qualitative
Studies on Health and Well-being , 9, 1-12.

Imaita, I. G. (2014). Marketing skills as a factor influencing adoption of innovations

along the mango supply chain in Meru County, Kenya. International Journal of
Current Business and Social Sciences , 1 (1), 64-76.

IST-Africa. (2015). Current ICT Initiatives and projects - Republic of Kenya. Nairobi:
IST-Africa.

Jiang, C., & Tian, Y. (2010). Problems and Challenges of Global Sourcing. A Study of
Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises. Jonkoping, China: Master thesis within
Business Administration. Jonkoping International Business School, Jonkoping
University.

Jianlin, W., & Qi, D. (2010). Moderating Effect of Personal Innovativeness in the Model for
E-store Loyalty. International Conference on E-Business and E-Government , 2065-2068.

Jiranyakul, K. (2013). Exchange Rate Uncertainty and Import Demand of Thailand. Asian
Economic and Financial Review , 3 (10), 1269-1280.

Kandil, M., Berument, H., & Dincer, N. N. (2007). The effects of exchange rate
fluctuations on economic activity in Turkey. Journal of Asian Economics , 18,
466–489.

Kattel, R., & Lember, V. (2010). Public Procurement as an Industrial Policy Tool: An
Option for Developing Countries? Journal of Public Procurement NT , 10 (3),
368-404.

Kenneth, W., Rebecca, N., & Eunice, M. A. (2012). Factors Affecting Adoption of
Electronic Commerceamong Small Medium Enterprises in Kenya: Survey of Tour
and Travel Firms in Nairobi. InternationalJournal of Business, Humanities and
Technology , 2 (1).

59
Kirui, O. K., Okello, J. J., & Nyikal, R. A. (2012). Impact of mobile phone-based money
transfer services in agriculture: evidence from Kenya. International Association of
Agricultural Economists (IAAE) Triennial Conference, Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil, 18- 24
August, 2012, (pp. 1-22).

Kisang, J. K., & Rotich, G. (2014). Challenges facing the use of e-procurement
applications in public organizations in Kenya: A case of Kenya Revenue Authority.
International Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship , 1 (12), 486-507.

Kivrak, S., Ross, A., Arslan, G., & Tuncan, M. (2009). Impacte of Cultural Difference on
Project Success in Construction. Dainty, A.R.J. (Ed) Procs 25th Annual ARCOM
Conference, 7-9 September 2009 (pp. 53-61). Nottingham, UK : Association of
Researchers in Construction Management.

Kothari, C. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods & Techniques (2nd ed.). New Delhi,
India: New age International Publishers.

Kundu, A., & Roy, D. D. (2010). A People – Centric approach in adoption of Innovation:
A review and directions for future research. Asian Journal of Management
Research , 49-58.

Kurihara, Y. (2013). Effects of Exchange Rate Fluctuations and Financial Development on

International Trade: Recent Experience. International Journal of
Bussiness,Management and Economic Research , 4 (5), 793-801.

Lanza, G., Weiler, S., & Vogt, S. (2009). Design for Low-Cost Country Sourcing:
Motivation, Basic Principles and Design Guidlines. Proceedings of the 19th CIRP
Design Conference – Competitive Design, Cranfield University, 30-31 March
2009 (p. 229 ). Cranfield University.

Lee, Y.-H., Hsieh, Y.-C., & Hsu, C.-N. (2011). Adding Innovation Diffusion Theory to the
Technology Acceptance Model:Supporting Employees’ Intentions to use E-
Learning Systems. Educational Technology & Society , 14 (4), 124–137.

60
Lekhanya, L. M. (2013). Cultural Influence On The Diffusion And Adoption Of Social
Media Technologies By Entrepreneurs In Rural South Africa. International
Business & Economics Research Journal , 12 (12), 1563-1574.

Letangule, S. L., & Letting, N. K. (2012). Technological Innovation and Corporate

Performance. International Journal of Management & Business Studies , 2 (3), 66-
72.

Lindsay, R., McCorquodale, R., Blecher, L., Bonnitcha, J., Crockett, A., & Sheppard, A.
(2013). Human rights responsibilities in the oil and gas sector: applying the UN
Guiding Principles. Journal of World Energy Law and Business , 6 (1), 2-66.

Lo, H.-Y. (2014). Quick Response Codes Around Us: Personality Traits, Attitudes
Toward Innovation and Acceptance. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research , 15
(1), 25-39.

Love, P., & Lattimore, R. (2009). Protectionism? Tariffs and Other Barriers to Trade in
International Trade-Free, Fair and Open? OECD Publishing .

Machogu, A. M. (2012). The Perception of Bank Employees towards Cost of

Adoption,Risk of Innovation, and Staff Training’s Influence on The Adoption of
Information and Communication Technology in The Rwandan Commercial Banks.
Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce , 17 (2), 1-15.

MacVaugh, J., & Schiavone, F. (2010). Limits to the diffusion of innovation:A literature
review and integrative model. European Journal of Innovation Management , 13 (2),
197-221.

Magenda, P. N., & Iravo, M. A. (2014). Factors Affecting the Adoption of Global Sourcing:
A Case Study of Tuskys Supermarkets, Kenya. Journal of Business and
Management , 16 (4), 72-76.

Mangan, J., Lalwani, C., & Butcher, T. (2008). Global Logistics and Supply Chain
Management. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.

61
Marez, L. D., Evens, T., & Stragier, J. (2011). Diffusion theory vs. today’s ICT
environment. Observatorio Journal , 5 (3), 175-202.

Martin, S., Beimborn, D., Parikh, M., & Weitzel, T. (2008). Organizational readiness for
business process outsourcing: a model of determinants and impact on outsourcing
success . Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on System
Sciences (pp. 374-383). Hawaii: IEEE.

Mazman, S. G., Usluel, Y. K., & Çevik, V. (2009). Social Influence in the Adoption
Process and Usage of Innovation: Gender Differences. International Journal of
Behavioral, Cognitive, Educational and Psychological Sciences , 1 (4), 229-232.

McIntosh, G., & Sloan, B. (2001). The Potential Imoact of Electronic Procurement and
Global Sourcing within the UK Construction Industry. Association of Researchers
in Construction Management , 1, 231-40.

Mikusova, M. (2010). Challenges of Globalization. Perspectives of Innovations, Economics

& Business , 6 (3), 7-11.

Mndzebele, N. (2013). The Effects of Relative Advantage, Compatibility and Complexity

in the Adoption of EC in the Hotel Industry. International Journal of Computer and
Communication Engineering , 2 (4), 473-476.

Moghavvemi, S., Hakimian, F., & Feissal, T. M. (2012). Competitive Advantages

Through IT Innovation Adoption by SMES. Social Technologies , 2 (1), 24-39.

Mohan, S., Khorana, S., & Choudhury, H. (2012). Barriers to prosperity– developing
countries and the need for trade. IEA Discussion Paper No. 44 . London: The
Institute of Economic Affairs.

Mose, J. M., Njihia, J. M., & Magutu, P. O. (2013). The Critical Success Factors and
Challenges in E-procurement Adoption Among Large Scale Manufacturing Firms
in Nairobi, Kenya. European Scientific Journal , 9 (13), 375-401.

62
Msimangira, K. A., & Tesha, C. P. (2014). Global Supply Chain Practices and Problems
Facing Developing Countries: A Study in Tanzania. Operations and Supply
Managment , 7 (3), 130 - 138.

Msimangira, K., & Tesha, C. (2009). International supply chain practices in developing
countries: A study in Tanzania. Production and Operations Management Society
(POMS), 20th Annual Conference. Orlando, Fl.

Muhammad, A. C., Faheem, M. A., Dost, M. K., & Abdullah, I. (2011). Globalization and
its Impacts on the World Economic Development. International Journal of
Business and Social Science , 2 (23), 291-297.

Musanzikwa, M. (2013). Public procurement system challenges in developing countries: the

case of Zimbabwe. International Journal of Economics, Finance and
Management Sciences , 1 (2), 119-127.

Mwangi, W. N. (2013). Factors hindering adoption of e-procurement in

telecommunication industry in Kenya: case of Safaricom limited. International
Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship , 1 (3), 138-148.

Mwikali, R., & Kavale, S. (2012). Factors Affecting the Selection of Optimal Suppliers in
Procurement Management. International Journal of Humanities and Social
Science , 2 (14), 189-193.

Nakumatt. (2015, March 24). About Use. Nairobi.

Nathan Associates. (2013). Non Tariff Barriers to Trade-Regional Agricultural Trade

Environment (RATE) Summary. USAID.

Ndungu, C. G., & Njeru, A. (2014). Assessment of Factors Influencing Adoption of

Agency Banking in Kenya: The Case of Kajiado North Sub County. International
Journal of Business and Commerce , 3 (8), 91-111.

Ngugi, K., & Karina, B. (2013). Effect of Innovation Strategy on performance of

Commercial Banks in Kenya. International Journal of Social Sciences and
Entrepreneurship , 1 (3), 158-170.

63
Nicita, A. (2013). Exhange Rate, International Trade and Trade Policies. Policy Issues in
International Trade and Commodities Study Series No. 56 . Geneva: UNCTAD.

Nyanchoka, E. M., & Namusonge, G. (2014). International Journal of Social Sciences

Management and Entrepreneurship. The Effects of Globalization on Sourcing: A
Case Study of Kenya Tea Development Agency , 1 (3), 76-91.

Obae, E. P. (2009). Study of the Turnaround Strategy Adopted by Kenya Revenue Authority.
A Master of Business Administration Thesis, University of Nairobi. Nairobi:
School of Business, UoN.

Okiro, K., & Ndungu, J. (2013). The Impact of Mobile and Internet Banking on
Performance of Financial institutions in Kenya. European Scientific Journal , 9
(13), 146-161.

Okumu, L., & Nyankori, J. C. (2010). Non-Tariff Barriers in EAC Customs Union:
Implication for Trade Between Uganda and Other EAC Countries. Economic
Policy Research Centre, Reserach Series No. 75 .

Ong, J. W., Poong, Y.-S., & Ng, T. H. (2008). 3G Services Adoption among University
Students: Diffusion of Innovation Theory. Communications of the IBIMA , 3, 114-121.

Ongong’a, J., & Ochieng, A. (2013). Innovation in the Tea Industry: The Case of Kericho
Tea, Kenya. Global Journal of Management and Business Research , 13 (1), 1-16.

Otieno, O. F., Muthoni, N. N., & Simon, M. (2013). Factors Affecting Use of E-
Procurement: A Survey in Selected Firms in Kisii Town, Kenya. Interdisciplinary
Journal of Contemporary Research in Business , 5 (4), 589-621.

Otten, S. (2014). Language and Cultural Barriers in International Factor Movements.

International Economic Association, 17th World Congress, 6 - 10 Jun 2014. Dead
Sea, Jordan .

Öztürk, A. A. (2012). The Fundamentals of Global Outsourcing for Manufacturers. In F. A.

Aziz (Ed.), Manufacturing System (pp. 27-50). In Tech.

64
Palmer, T. G. (2002). Globalization is Great ! Washington: Cato's Letter.

Panuwatwanich, K., & Stewart, R. A. (2012). Evaluating Innovation Diffusion Readiness

among Architectural and Engineering Design Firms: Empirical Evidence from
Australia. Automation in construction , 27, 50-59.

Peralta, H., & Costa, F. (2007). Teachers’ competence and confidence regarding the use of
ICT. Educational Sciences Journal , 3, 75-84.

Ramazani, M., & Allahyari, A. (2013). Compatibility and Flexibility of Accounting

Information Systems. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information
Sciences , 4 (3), 290-295.

Rickard, S. J., & Kono, D. Y. (2013). Think globally, buy locally: International
agreements and government procurement. Business Media . New York: Springer
Science.

Robinson, L. (2012). Changeology: How to Enable Groups, Communities and Societies to

Do Things They've Never Done Before. Cambridge, UK: UIT Cambridge Ltd.

Rouibah, K., & Abbas, H. (2010). Effect of Personal Innovativeness, Attachment Motivation
and Social Norms on the Acceptance of Camera Mobile Phones: An Empirical Study
in an Arab Country. International Journal of Handheld Computing Research , 1 (4),
41-62.

Ruikar, K., Anumba, C., & Carrillo, P. (2006). VERDICT - An e-readiness assessment
application for construction companies. Automation in Construction , 15 (1), 98- 110.

Sahin, I. (2006). Detailed Review of Rogers' Diffusion of Innovation Theory and

Educational Technology-Related Stufies Based on Rogers' Theory. The Turkish
Online Journal of Educational Technology , 5 (2), 14-23.

Salaria, N. (2012). Meaning of the Term Descriptive Survey Research Method.

International Journal of Transformations in Business Management , 1 (6), 1-7.

65
Schumacher, R. (2013). Deconstructing the Theory of Comparative Advantage. World
Economic Review , 2, 83-105.

Serenis, D. (2013). Does Exchange Rate Volatility Hinder Export Flows for South
American countries? Applied Economics , 20 (5), 436-439.

Shaw, F. (2010). The Power to Procure: A Look inside the City of Austin Procurement
Program. Applied Research Projects, Texas State University .

Shen, J. (2012). Social Comparison,Social Presence and Enjoyment in the Acceptance of

Social Shopping Websites. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research , 13 (3),
198-212.

Ślusarczyk, B. (2010). Transport Importance in the Global Trade. Advanced Logistic

Systems , 4, 186-192.

Smit, A. (2010). The competitive advantage of nations: is Porter’s Diamond Framework a

new theory that explains the international competitiveness of countries? Southern
African Business Review , 14, 105-130.

Steger, M. B. (2009). Globalization: A Very Short Introduction. Hampshire: Oxford

Univeristy Press.

Sumiyu, F. B. (2013). Effects of innovation strategies on performance of commercial

banks in Kenya. International Journal of Social Sciences and Entrepreneurship , 1
(3), 198-207.

Talukder, M. (2012). Factors affecting the adoption of technological innovation by

individual employees: An Australian study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences , 40, 52 – 57.

Talukder, M., Harris, H., & Mapunda, G. (2008). Adoption of Innovations by Individuals
within Organizations: An Australian Study. Asia Pacific Management Review , 13
(2), 463-480.

66
Thai, K. V. (2007). Challenges facing public procurement. In L. Knight, C. Harland, J.
Telgen, K. V. Thai, G. Callender, & K. McKen, Public procurement:
international cases and commentary (pp. 351-358). Abingdon (UK): Routledge.

Thoumrungroje, A., & Tansuhaj, P. (2007). Globalization (Analysis). Journal of

International Business Research Publisher , 6 (2).

Tolba, A., & Mourad, M. (2011). Individual and cultural factors affecting diffusion of
innovation. Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies , 5 (3), 203- 218.

Velentzas, J., & Broni, G. (2010). Ethical Dimensions in the Conduct of Business:
Business Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law. The "Ethics in
Business" As a Sense of Business Ethics. International Conference On Applied
Economics – ICOAE 2010, (pp. 795-819).

Verheyen, F. (2012). Bilateral Exports from Euro Zone Countries to the US: Does
Exchange Rate Variability Play a Role? International Review of Economics and
Finance , 24 (1), 97-106.

Wanyoike, D. M., & Mukulu, E. (2012). International Journal of Arts and Commerce , 1 (7),
48-60.

Wen, L., Zailani, S., & Fernando, Y. (2009). Determinants of RFID Adoption in Supply
Chain among Manufacturing Companies in China: A Discriminant Analysis.
Journal of Technology, Management and Innovation , 4 (1), 22-32.

Weng, M.-H., & Lin, C.-Y. (2011). Determinants of green innovation adoption for small and
medium-size enterprises (SMES). African Journal of Business Management , 5
(22), 9154-9163.

Weru, J. M., Kamaara, M. W., & Weru, A. N. (2013). Impact of strategic change:
Introduction of electronic tax register for enhancement of tax collection at Kenya
Revenue Authority. International Journal of Social Sciences and Enterpreneurship ,
1 (5), 257-270.

67
World Trade Organization. (2013). World Trade Report 2013: Factors shaping the future
of world trade. Geneva: World Trade Organization.

Xu, H., & Gupta, S. (2009). The effects of privacy concerns and personal innovativeness on
potential and experienced customers’ adoption of location-based services. Electron
Markets , 19, 137–149.

Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY:
Harper and Row.

Yeniyurt, S., Henke-Jr., W., & Cavusgil, E. (2012). Integrating

globalandlocalprocurementforsuperiorsupplierworking relations. International
BusinessReview , http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.06.004.

Yusof, N., Abu-Jarad, I. Y., & Badree, M. H. (2012). The effectiveness of Government
Incentives to facilitate an Innovative Housing Development Delivery. Theoretical and
Empirical Researches in Urban Management , 7 (1), 55-68.

Zailani, S., Iranmanesh, M., Nikbin, D., & Jumadi, H. B. (2014). Determinants and
environmental outcome of green technology innovation adoption in the
transportation industry in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation , 22 (2),
286-301.

Zeng, A. Z., & Rossetti, C. (2003). Developing a framework for evaluating the logistics
costs in global sourcing processes-An implementation and insights. International
Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management , 33 (9), 785-803.

68
 APPENDICES
Appendix A: Cover Letter

CELL: 0713603124 P.O. Box 14634, 00800

EMAIL: vicgrac@yahoo.com NAIROBI

DATE:
Date: .

Respondent,

Dear Sir/Madam,

RESEARCH QUESTIONNAIRE

I am a graduate student at United States International University-Africa pursuing a Master’s

degree in Business Administration. As partial fulfillment of the course, I am conducting a
research to identify the effects of globalization on procurement. The study uses Nakumatt
Holdings Limited as a case study.

The results from the study will be significant to the organization as the information will help
in setting strategic directions. The study will also be insightful to the government in
developing policies that regard international trade.

This is an academic research and confidentiality is strictly emphasized, your name will not
appear anywhere in the report. Kindly spare 20 minutes to complete the questionnaire
attached.

Thank you in advance,

Yours Faithfully,

Victoria Mumassabba

69
 Appendix B: Questionnaire

The purpose of this questionnaire is to effects of globalization on procurement. Please

respond by either selecting the response among choices given that best represents your views
or by filling the spaces provided.

Part A: General Information

1. What is you gender?

Female [ ] Male [ ]

2. What is your Age in years?

Below 30 [ ] 31-40 [ ] 41-50 [ ] Above 50 [ ]

3. How long have you worked in your present organization?

Below 1 year [ ] 1-5 years [ ] 5-10 years [ ] More than 10 years [ ]

4. What is your highest education level?

Secondary Certificate [ ] Diploma level [ ]

Bachelor’s Degree Level [ ] Masters Level [ ]

Doctorate level [ ] Other (specify)………………………

5. What is your management position in the organization?

Senior level management [ ]

Middle level management [ ]

Non-management staff [ ]

70
Part B: Drivers of Global Procurement

6. What is your level of agreement to the following statements relating drives of global
procurement in your organization? (5- Strongly agree, 4- Agree, 3-Neutral, 2-Disagree, 1-
Strongly Disagree)
1 2 3 4 5

Cost Drivers

My organization prefers sourcing goods and services from other [] [] [] [] []

countries so as to gain economies of scale
A huge pool of quality products and qualified suppliers at the [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
global stage gives Nakumatt a higher bargaining power
Nakumatt sources from other countries due to low international [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
prices
Nakumatt holdings consider global sourcing since it accelerates [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
technological innovation
Competitive Drivers

At Nakumatt, global procurement is viewed as a source of [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

competitive innovation
Global procurement of services is used at Nakumatt to attract the [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
best talents for competitive advantage
Nakumatt uses global procurement to get products of the highest [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
quality
Global procurement is used at Nakumatt to ensure constant supply [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
of goods for competitive advantage
Government Drivers

Global procurement at Nakumatt was triggered by market [] [] [] [] []

liberalization
Favorable government policies have ensured efficient procurement [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
at Nakumatt

71
 Bilateral trade agreements between Kenya and other countries have [] [] [] [] []
enhanced ease of global procurement by Nakumatt
Kenya has adopted international quality standards that make it ease [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
for global procurement at Nakumatt
Technology

Global procurement at Nakumatt is a product of integrated [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

procurement systems at the organization
Payments for global purchases at Nakumatt is mainly online based [] [] [] [] []

Internet has made global procurement at Nakumatt much easier [] [] [] [] []

Mobile technology plays a significant role in global procurement at [] [] [] [] []

Nakumatt

7. What other factors in your opinion drive global procurement at Nakumatt holdings?
………………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………

Part C: Global Factors Affecting the Adoption of Global Procurement

8. What is your level of agreement to the following statements relating to the adoption of
global procurement in your organization? (5- Strongly agree, 4- Agree, 3-Neutral, 2-
Disagree, 1- Strongly Disagree)
1 2 3 4 5

Currency Fluctuations

High currency exchange rates discourage importation of goods by [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

Nakumatt
At some points my organization replaces a preferred suppliers [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
because of changes in exchange rates
The loss of purchasing power of the local currency against the hard [] [] [] [] []
currencies leads to high prices on imports

72
Instability of the local currency prohibits my organization from [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
sourcing goods from other countries
Complicated Logistics

My organization often suffer adverse logistical issues in port [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

clearance and delays
Quite often, my organization fails to procure goods outside the [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
country due to high cost of logistics
Procurement from outside Kenya has longer inventory management [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
process
My organization often face poor handling of return goods and [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
containers
Tariffs and non-Tariff Barriers

My organization faces a problem of unreasonable demand on [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

standards and quality of imported goods from state agents
We face bureaucratic delays at the custom whenever goods are [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
imported from outside the country
Global sourcing of goods at my organization have been hampered [] [] [] [] []
by road blocks and barriers
Imported goods are less competitive in the domestic market due to [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
tariffs levied on imports
Culture and Language Differences

Cultural differences lead to instability of the relationship between [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

my organization and import suppliers
Cultural and language differences between Nakumatt employees [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
and the import suppliers affect business transactions
Miscommunication with a foreign suppliers lead to conflict or [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
supply of wrong products
Different cultures and languages between different countries from [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
where we source imports have effect on the procurement processes

73
9. What other factors affect global procurement at Nakumatt?

………………………………………………………………………………………………

……………………………………………………………………………………

Part D: Global Procurement Strategies

10. What is your level of agreement to the following statements relating to global
procurement strategies in your organization? (5- Strongly agree, 4- Agree, 3-Neutral, 2-
Disagree, 1- Strongly Disagree)
1 2 3 4 5

Low Labor Cost and Quality Standards

Nakumatt often procure from countries with the lowest production [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

labor cost
We only order goods from countries were the company spends the [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
least on forwarding services
Agency cost is a major deciding factor when Nakumatt sources [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
goods outside the country
Nakumatt sources goods only from countries with a reputation for [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
quality products
Good Transport System

Transport cost is a major deciding factor when Nakumatt sources [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

goods outside the country
Nakumatt sources products only from countries with the best [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
transport networks
Access to several means of transport determines whether Nakumatt [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
sources from a country
Nakumatt prefers to source from countries where her staff can
easily access for spot-checks of the supplier’s facility to ensure [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
they are complying with local laws and regulations

74
 Nakumatt prefers to source from countries where her staff can
easily access the market on the ground to learn of any competitive [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
threats or supplier knock-offs that might be in the works
Good Human Rights Records and Rule of Law

Nakumatt only imports from countries with full democracies [] [] [] [] []

As a precondition, Nakumatt considers how employees who make [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

the products they import from a foreign country are treated
Nakumatt don’t import products from countries with poor human [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
rights records
Nakumatt don’t procure goods from countries considered to be [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
having corrupt systems
Nakumatt shies away from purchasing goods from countries with [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
poor records of the rule of law
Same Language and culture

Nakumatt prefers sourcing of goods from countries of the same [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]

culture
At Nakumatt, language is a major consideration in selecting a [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
country to import goods
Nakumatt only sources goods mainly from those countries with [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
similar systems
Nakumatt trains her employees on foreign languages to ease global [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
procurement

10. What other global procurement strategies are being used by Nakumatt?

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………………

Thank You

75
76