Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
'Following are quotes issued by courts within the United States of America -- which attest to All Notes
the fact that a court's jurisdiction over parties appearing before the court, may be challenged
by any party, and at any time. A court, upon such challenge, is compelled to answer the
Embed Post
challenge, and prove to the challenger's reasonable doubt that it, the court, possesses
Report
jurisdiction for a particular action before the court.
Typically, challenges to a court's jurisdiction pertain to criminal proceedings and prosecutions People You May Know See All
-- whereby an accused, or a defendant, may challenge a court's jurisdiction to adjudicate a
Kinzo Beachem
criminal case. The maxim of law therefore, substantiated by numerous case cites, is that 2 mutual friends
once challenged, a court's jurisdiction must be proven. Add Friend
"Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that Alan Petty Jr
37 mutual friends
the court lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but, rather,
Add Friend
should dismiss the action." Melo v. US, 505 F2d 1026.
Jay Holloway (Jason
"Court must prove on the record, all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction Holloway)
asserted." Add Friend
Latana v. Hopper, 102 F. 2d 188; Chicago v. New York, 37 F Supp. 150.
"The law provides that once State and Federal Jurisdiction has been challenged, it
Friend Requests See All
must be proven."
Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502 (1980). Linda Camero
4 mutual friends
Confirm Friend
"Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time." and "Jurisdiction, once challenged,
cannot be assumed and must be decided." Emily Garcia
Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co., 495 F 2d 906, 910. 25 mutual friends
Confirm Friend
"Defense of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter may be raised at any time, even Ricardo N Miriam Stallings
on appeal." Jr.
Hill Top Developers v. Holiday Pines Service Corp., 478 So. 2d. 368 (Fla 2nd DCA 1985) 31 mutual friends
Confirm Friend
"The burden shifts to the court to prove jurisdiction." Rosemond v. Lambert, 469 F2d
416.
"A universal principle as old as the law is that a proceedings of a court without
jurisdiction are a nullity and its judgment therein without effect either on person or
property." Norwood v. Renfield, 34 C 329; Ex parte Giambonini, 49 P. 732.
"Jurisdiction is fundamental and a judgment rendered by a court that does not have
jurisdiction to hear is void, ab initio."
In Re Application of Wyatt, 300 P. 132; Re Cavitt, 118 P2d 846.
"Thus, where a judicial tribunal has no jurisdiction of the subject matter on which it
assumes to act, its proceedings are absolutely void in the fullest sense of the term."
Dillon v. Dillon, 187 P 27.
Chat (1)
"Where a court failed to observe safeguards, it amounts to denial of due process of
law, court is deprived of juris."
Merritt v. Hunter, C.A. Kansas 170 F2d 739.
"An action by Department of Motor Vehicles, whether directly or through a court sitting
administratively as the hearing officer, must be clearly defined in the statute before it
has subject matter jurisdiction, without such jurisdiction of the licensee, all acts of the
agency, by its employees, agents, hearing officers, are null and void."
Doolan v. Carr, 125 US 618; City v. Pearson, 181 Cal. 640.
"When acting to enforce a statute and its subsequent amendments to the present date,
the judge of the municipal court is acting as an administrative officer and not in a
judicial capacity; courts in administering or enforcing statutes do not act judicially, but
merely ministerially".
Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 583.
"A judge ceases to sit as a judicial officer because the governing principle of
administrative law provides that courts are prohibited from substituting their evidence,
testimony, record, arguments, and rationale for that of the agency. Additionally, courts
are prohibited from substituting their judgment for that of the agency. Courts in
administrative issues are prohibited from even listening to or hearing arguments,
presentation, or rational."
ASIS v. US, 568 F2d 284.
"Ministerial officers are incompetent to receive grants of judicial power from the
legislature, their acts in attempting to exercise such powers are necessarily nullities."
Burns v. Sup. Ct., SF, 140 Cal. 1.
"The elementary doctrine that the constitutionality of a legislative act is open to attack
only by persons whose rights are affected thereby, applies to statute relating to
administrative agencies, the validity of which may not be called into question in the
absence of a showing of substantial harm, actual or impending, to a legally protected
interest directly resulting from the enforcement of the statute."
Board of Trade v. Olson, 262 US 1; 29 ALR 2d 105.
# # #
Joseph O'Leary can you add me Robyn? Fascistbook has censored yet another
patriot...
1
5y · Like
Michael W. Flaherty I agree that one must challenge jurisdiction of a court. I also
Chat (1)
suggest learning the law and challenging jurisdiction. However most of the case
citations listed above do not exist. Of the citations above I could only find six in
reliable locations. All... See More
5
5y · Like
Carly Lebrun I just left the Maricopa County Superior Court. I challenged them on
subject matter jurisdiction, as they failed miserably to follow due process on a
criminal case. They claimed that only federal courts are courts of subject matter
jurisdiction, and state courts are of general jurisdiction. Does anyone know how to
rebut this?
6
4y · Like
Robyna Choleton Carly, it's amazing how these magistrates attempt to obfuscate
the most basic of things. 1. There is in-personam jurisdiction, i.e. jurisdiction over
the "person" (a "person" being a corporate name only -- rendered in all capital
letters).
2. Subjec... See More
21
4y · Like
Robyna Choleton Here's another extremely good reason why patriotic Americans
need to distance themselves from having anything to do with the corrupt private
court system -- which masquerades itself as legitimate. Conspiracy theories,
anyone? Enjoy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxCIJZI74Oo
YOUTUBE.COM
5
4y · Like
Michael Montgomery ~22~ this is the exact way to everyone's freedom > all are
welcome to file this in any court if you have the nerve to be a patriot. do not use
caps to identify yourself as this diminishes your status.
https://www.facebook.com/notes/michael-montgomery/notice-to-all-courts-i-
challenge-your-jurisdiction/730823053606508
6
4y · Like
There are three stages of loosing a persons personality namely:... See More
7
4y · Like
David Johansen ""The burden shifts to the court to prove jurisdiction." Rosemond
v. Lambert, 469 F2d 416."
shifts from the plaintiff?, the plaintiff must prove jurisdiction exists, the plantiff must
bring the complaint to the DEFANDANTS jurisdiction.
5
3y · Like
John Smith All these case sites are great but...For the average people, How many
jurisdictions are there, How do I challenge jurisdiction..(STEP-by-step), How do I
know when they dont have it, and what do i do/say when they dont have it? Please
Help...Trying to understand but I have to do step 1 before step 10...I'm an Engineer.
6
3y · Like
Robyna Choleton John, I appreciate your concerns regarding this important topic
of jurisdiction of a court.
Currently, no patriotically minded American should EVER enter any one of "their"
Chat (1)
courts. Why not? It's because they are ALL part of the Lawyers Guild in the
C... See More
13
3y · Like
Ward Kenny How do you go about it motion or orally would like to challange
housing court as well as dmv e-mail me kjpw7@hotmail.com
1
2y · Like
LaDarius Doron Amadi Meir This can even be applied to child support.
3
2y · Like
Wendie Derrick Why can't I find any of these court cases on the internet? The only
place I find them are in the articles mentioning the cases.
1
1y · Like
Robyna Choleton Wendie, I too have never been able to locate case cites on the
internet, with few exceptions. What I've done to look them up is to physically go to a
law library, and a librarian can help direct you to the case cite, that shows the
complete text of th... See More
1
1y · Like
Steve Brandt Sr i challenged jurisdiction with cases sited and even moved to
disqualify the judge and the answer i got was ..we dont have to prove anything.
6
1y · Like
Alana Ray Tobin Steve, Carly and others did you challenge jurisdiction in writing?
And did you appear in court? If you appeared in their court you contracted under
their jurisdiction simply by showing up. If jailed for not appearing, you must say, "I
am here by specia... See More
Colin McCabe
May 20, 2017
The following challenge letter can be used in any state of this Union:
https://cdn.fbsbx.com/…/Square-Challenge-and-Denial-of-Subj…
Steve Curry Folks, the "Court" is NOT the judge! It's not the so-called "judge!" It's
not the Pro-Se-Cutor! It's not even the jury!! It is the record of PAPER(s) you
present, or the Counter Affidavit/Complaint to the PAPER(s) filed against a fictional
corporat... See More
2
33w · Like
Brian Wade It's not as simple as just citing the supreme court opinions above.
there are several things you need to be aware of or your going to be cited for
contempt or put into a rule 11 competency situation if your'e going to attempt
challenging jurisdiction f... See More Chat (1)
1
1
27w · Edited · Like
Tao Lauw Just a suggestion, but it is NOT a good idea to use the Corpus Juris
Secundem's (CJS) SUMMARY SUPPOSITION as the actual cite for the case. You
NEVER should post a case citation that is NOT verified as appearing in the actual
opinion as written by the C... See More
Write a comment...
About Create Ad Create Page Developers Careers Privacy Cookies Ad Choices Terms Help
Facebook © 2018
English (US) Español Français (France) 中文(简体) اﻟﻌرﺑﯾﺔPortuguês (Brasil) Italiano 한국어 Deutsch िह ी 日本語
Chat (1)