Sie sind auf Seite 1von 12

LIST OF FILES TO BE PREPARED

1.CONTENTS BEYOND SYLLABUS TAUGHT TO STUDENTS FOR THREE CONSECUTIVE


YEAR FROM CURRENT YEAR
(EACH YEAR SEPERATE TABLE TO BE PREPARED)
Example table is below for 2018 ,same table to be prepared for 2017 and 2016
Date- Resource
SN Action % of
Gap Bridging Month- Person with
o Taken students
Year designation
Dr.C.B.
Imagine, Inspire and
VijayaVittal
Innovate -innovations in Guest
a,
engineering how to apply the Lecture 100%
27/02/20 Professor &
1. basic concepts from Third year
18 Head
theory.CAD/CAE/CAM students
(R& D),
simulation used in design the
HMSIT,
Applications
Tumkur.
100%
To enhance the knowledge (All
of faculty in usage of tools Faculty
Faculty nd
other than specified in the 22 to Members)
Develop
2. Curriculum. 25th June Table:2.1.2a 40
ment
How Engineers are 2018 percipients
Program
Sustainable in Product from the
Design and Manufacturing all over
Tamilnadu
3. In energy engineering how Dr. M C.
Guest
the Biodiesel development Math, 100%
Lecture 01/10/20
and characterization concept VTU, PG Third year
18
used and get practical Centre, students
knowledge to students. Mysuru
1.1 faculty development program/ industrial visit photos to be collected

2.Academic Calendar ,
2.1.Details of encouragement given to bright students
2.2. Details of assistance given to weak students
2.3. Quality of student projects (Example table is given below)
Evaluation scheme for Final year Project
Phase - 1
Sl. No. Performance Indicator Marks
(a) Literature Survey / Phase 1 Report. 10
(b) Presentation. 10
(c) Questioner. 05
Phase-2
Sl. No. Performance Indicator Marks
(a) Methodology Phase 2 Reports. 10
(b) Presentation. 10
(c) Questioner. 05
Phase-3

Sl. No. Performance Indicator Marks


(a) Final Report 25
(b) Demo with Presentation 15
(c) Questioner 10
2.4. Lecture method and Interactive learning(descriptive text about 3-5 lines include photos of
class room teaching if any)

2.5. Project-based learning (descriptive text about 3-5 lines include photos of class room teaching
if any)

2.6. Computer-assisted learning (descriptive text about 3-5 lines include photos of class room
teaching if any)

2.7. SMART class Room (descriptive text about 3-5 lines include photos of class room teaching if
any)

2.8. Methodologies to support weak students and encourage bright students

(Example table given below )


MENTORING SYSTEM

Identification Criteria Actions taken

Students scoring less than 60% of marks in 1. Student counselor follows their
Internal Assessment. progress regularly advising students
about attending classes, making up
classes missed, and getting additional
help.
2. Intimating parents to counsel their
wards.
3. Conduction of remedial classes
Diploma students who entered with less basics Conduction of remedial classes.
of mathematics
Students who fail in semester exams Conduction of extra classes to those who failed
in previous semester subjects.

Guidelines to identify Bright students

Identification Criteria Actions taken

FCD functions are conducted to felicitate those


students and Mementos are also distributed to
Students awarded with First Class with motivate them to continue their Excellency in
Distinction (FCD) in their Semester exams. academics. to take up mini projects&
encourage to participate in inter college
national/international fest, motivate to take
civil exams
Top three students of each class. Awarded with mementos

Students securing ranks at University level. Distribution of Gold medals

2.9.Process for Encouraging Bright Students and Assisting Weak Students( Flow Chart)

2.9.Quality of classroom teaching(descriptive text about 3-5 lines include photos of class room
teaching if any)

2.10. Conduct of Experiments(descriptive text about 3-5 lines include photos of class room
teaching if any)

2.11 Continuous Assessment in laboratory

2.12. Student feedback of teaching learning process and actions taken

2.13. Best three Projects for 2018,2017,2016 to be prepared seperately.(example table is given below)
SL Guide
Project Title Name
No. Name
Analysis Of Scale Mr.Akash
1 effects in peer-to-peer Dalmia Mr. Mahantesh
Networks Mr.Rakesh J

Path reconstruction in
Mr.Rajat Kuma
2 WSN using compressive
Mr.Saurabh R .
Mrs.Usha
sensing
Secure data aggregation
Ms.Apeksha
techniques for WSN in Mrs.Kavitha
3 the presence of collusion Ms.Bhargavi
attack

2.14. Evidences of Papers Published/Awards received by projects if Any.(example table is given


below)
Sl no Event Student name Title
1 National Apeksha kulkarni Secure data aggregation technique for wireless
Conference sensor networks in the presence of collusion
SPCN-16 Bhargavi G attack
2 National Akash Dalmia Novel Method for data aggregation in WSN
Conference
SPCN-16 Rakesh Jangid

2.15. MOU’s with Industries .(example table is given below)

Sl.no Company Name Date


1. Eduwizw Private Limited 16/03/2016

(company logo)
2. CMS IT Services Private Limited 05/11/2015

(company logo)

S.NO Name Year Internship Topic Company

1 Afshan Hussain
SMS GATEWAY
2 Gousia Nisba
2017-18 INTEGRATION INTO ERP
3 Jaya Apoorva
4 Sharmilaa S
Eduwize
5 Assif Imran
SMS GATEWAY
6 Prashanth Shan 2017-18
7 Rakesh Kumar INTEGRATION INTO ERP
3. STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE.(example table is given below)
CAY CAYm1 CAYm2
Item
(2015- (2014- (2013-
(Information to be provided cumulatively for all the shifts with
19) 18) 17)
explicit headings, wherever applicable)

60 60 60
Sanctioned intake of the program (N)
56 37 41
Total number of students admitted in first year minus number of
students migrated to other programs/institutions plus no. of
students migrated to this program (N1)
NA 02 00
Number of students admitted in 2nd year in the same batch via
lateral entry (N2)
3 3 3
Separate division students, if applicable (N3)
59 42 44
Total number of students admitted in the Program (N1 + N2 + N3)

3.1.

Number of students who have successfully


graduated without backlogs in any
semester/year of study
N1 + N2 + N3 (Without Backlog means no compartment or
Year of failures in any semester/year of study)
entry (As defined
above) I Year II Year III Year IV Year
56+0+3=59 - - - -
CAY(2015-19)

CAYm1(2014-18)
37+2+3=42 6

CAYm2(2013-17)
41+0+3=44 19 15 14 -
28+1+1=30 09 07 04 04
CAYm3
(LYG)(2012-16)

CAYm4
21+1+0=22 09 05 04 04
(LYGm1)(2011-15)

CAYm5
41+0+0=41 17 09 09 09
(LYGm2)(2010-14)

CAYm6(LYG
13 04 04 04

Number of students who have successfully


N1 + N2 + graduated
Year of entry
N3
I Year II Year III Year IV Year
(As defined
above)
CAY(2015-19)
56+0+3=59 - - - -

CAYm1(2014-18)
37+2+3=42 20 - - -

CAYm2(2013-17)
41+0+3=44 38 31 31
28+1+1=30 25 21 22 22
CAYm3 (LYG)(2012-16)

CAYm4 (LYGm1)(2011-15)
21+1+0=22 19 19 23 25

CAYm5 (LYGm2)(2010-14)
41+0+0=41 38 33 37 38

24 20 18 18
CAYm6(LYGm3)(2009
-10)

Enrolment Ratio
Ratio Marks
Year of entry
56/60=93.3% 20
CAY (2015-16)
38/60=63.3% 14
CAYm1(2014-15)
41/60=68.3% 14
CAYm2(2013-2014)
21/60=35% 0
CAYm3 (LYG) (2012-13)

CAYm4 (LYGm1)(2011- 21/60=35% 0


12)
14
CAYm5(LYGm2) (2010- 41/60=68.3%
11)
CAYm6(LYGm3)(2009- 25/60=41.6% 0
10)

3.2. Success rate without backlogs in any semester/year of study

SI= (Number of students who have graduated from the program without backlog)/
(Number of students admitted in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd year via
lateral entry an d separate division, if applicable)

Average SI = Mean of Success Index (SI) for past three batch Success rate without backlogs in
any year of study
= 25 × Average SI

Latest Year of Latest Year of Latest Year of


Item Graduation, Graduation minus Graduation minus
LYG 1, LYGm1 2, LYGm2
Number of students admitted in the 68 52 78
(CAYm3) (CAYm4) (CAYm5)
corresponding First Year + admitted in
2nd year via lateral entry and
separate division, if applicable
Number of students who have 00 07 14+02
graduated without backlogs in the
stipulated period
00 0.1346 0.2051
Success Index (SI)
0.1132 Success Rate= 25*.1131= 2.83
Average SI

3.3.Success rate Success Rate with Backlogs in stipulated period

SI= (Number of students who graduated from the program in the stipulated period of
course duration)/ (Number of students admitted in the first year of that batch and
admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable)

Average SI = mean of Success Index (SI) for past three batches Success rate =
15 × Average SI

Item LYG (CAYm3) LYGm1(CAYm4) LYGm2(CAY


Number of students admitted in the 68 52 m5) 78
corresponding First Year + admitted in
2nd year via lateral entry and separate
division, if applicable
Success Rate with Backlogs 57 46 54
Success Index (SI) 0.8382 0.8846 0.6923
Average Success Index 0.8050 Success Rate= 15*.8050= 12.0755
3.4. Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship.(example table is given below)

Item CAY CAYm1 CAYm2


59 57 55
Total No. of Final Year Students (N)
30 40 32
No. of students placed in companies or Government Sector (x)
04 02 03
No. of students admitted to higher studies with valid qualifying
scores
(GATE or equivalent -------- --------- ----------
No. of students turnedState or National
entrepreneur Level Tests, GRE, GMAT
in engineering/technology (z)
etc.) (y)
34 42 35
x+y+z=
0.57 0.74 0.64
Placement Index : (x + y + z )/N
0.65
Average
4. Professional placement= (P1table
Activities.(example + P2is+given
P3)/3below)

Sl No Professional Societies Event


1 Solar society of India – Guest Talk by T Kiran
Student Chapter CEO Medidart, Bangalore.

4.1. Professional Societies Memberships

Sl No Professional Societies Member

1 Solar Society of India Dr Eswarmoorthy


2 Indian Society of Technical Education Dr Eswarmoorthy
3 Institute of Engineers India Dr Eswarmoorthy
4 Institute of Engineers India Dr Suresh P M
5 Indian Society of Technical Education Prof Siddesh

4.2.Publication of technical magazines, newsletters(photos,soft & hard copies of relevant


documents)

4.3. Participation in inter institute events by students of the program of study(photos,soft & hard
copies of relevant documents)

4.4 INTER COLLEGE ACHIEVEMENT LIST.(example table is given below)


Sl. EVENT TITLE COLLEGE DATE PRIZE
No.
1 THEME BASED DON BOSCO INSTITUTE OF 29,30 APRIL, 2ND PLACE
PAINTING TECHNOLOGY, BENGALURU 2014 CASH AWARD
2 CAD 3D CHRIST 20 FEBRUARY 1ST PLACE
MODELLING UNIVERRSITY,BENGALURU 2015 CASH AAWARD
5. STUDENT-FACULTY RATIO

S: F ratio =N/F: N = No. of Students = 3X Where X is (Approved intake + 20% lateral entry intake
+separate division, if any)
F= No. of faculty = (a + b - c) for every assessment year.
a: Total number of full time regular Faculty serving fully to 2nd,3rd ,4th year of the this program.
b: Total number of full time equivalent regular faculty (considering fractional load) serving this
program from other program(s).
c: Total number of full time equivalent regular faculty (considering fractional load) of this
program serving other program(s).

Year X N F SFR= N/F

2016-2017 3x72 216 12 18

CAY(2015-2016) 3x72 216 12 18

CAYm1(2014-2015) 3x72 216 12 18

CAYm2(2013-2014) 3x72 216 12 18

Average SFR for three assessment years 18

5.1.INNOVATIONS BY THE FACULTY IN TEACHING AND LEARNING (example is shown)

 Smart Class room facilities


 Using animation

5.2.FACULTY AS PARTICIPANTS IN FACULTY DEVELOPMENT / TRAINING


ACTIVITES / STTPs.(example table is given below)
 A Faculty scores maximum five points for participation
 Participation on 2 to 5 days Faculty development program: 3 points
 Participation > 5 days faculty development program: 5points
Name of the Faculty Max. 5 per faculty
CAY CAYm1 CAYm2
Dr. Eshwara moorthy 5 5 ---
Mr. Siddhesha.H.S 5 5 5
Dr. R.Sivasubramaniyam 5 3 3
Mr. Babu Gowda C.M 5 5 5
Mr. Kumar B.M 5 5 3
Mr. Sandeep.G.R 5 3 3
Mr. Sunil Raj.B.A 5 3 3
Mr. Srinidhi Aacharya.S 5 3 3
Mr.Jogi adharsh 3 --- ---
Mr. Chandrashekhar B 5 5 ---
Ms. Chandrakala K 3 --- ---
Mr. Sivasankar.P 3 ---- ---
Sum 54 37 25
RF=Number of faculty required to
comply with 15:1 Student-faculty 12 12 12
ratio as per 5.1
Assessment = 3x(Sum/ 0.5RF) 27 18.5 12.5
Average assessment over three years 19.33

6.1. FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT.(example table is given below)


Sl. Lab Name of Number Name of the Weekly Technical man power support
No No the of important utilization Name of the Designation Qualification
technical staff
Laboratory students equipment status
per (All the
setup courses
(batch for which
size) the lab is
utilized)

SS&OS Lab Computer


(Odd sem) Systems with
1 Lab1 20 required 9 hours Chandana Instructor B.E
Softwares ,
Project Lab with
(Even Sem) additional 10
Systems

NW/ Computer
M.TechI Systems with
2 Lab2 Sem Lab 20 required 12 hours Shivukumar Instructor B.E
(Odd Sem) Softwares ,
with
additional 10
Systems

6.1.Additional facilities created for improving the quality of learning experience


in laboratories.(example table is given below)

Sl. Facility Details Reasons for Utilizations Areas in which


no Name creating facility students are
expected to
have enhanced
learning

1 Computer Using Scrap To provide 5 hours per Real time


Peripheral /Unused complete picture of week experience
Assembly computers hardware devices for of
Lab better understanding dissembling,
of the subjects locating the
devices,
assembling
the system
2 Smart class Fully equipped To enhancing Per Better
facility shared Smart Class Teaching Semester understanding
room with LCD Learning 15 hours
projector and
software's with the
seating capacity of
80. Comfortable
desks, chairs and
teaching aids. Glass
board,
Fan, Tube light,
chalk board
3 E-journal IEEE, For research Complete Research
Facility IGate, and project activities. semester is activity,
Springer, To know about recent opened to Recent trends
trends in science and utilize in
technology engineering,
Project
activity

4 Common Ethernet/WiFi Facility to staff Complete More knowledge


Internet and students for semester is apart
Facility enhancing Teaching opened to from
Learning , utilize curriculu
m,
24×7 access to
learning
5 MAT Lab Control system , In addition to the VTU Complete Itresorces
is helpful for
Facility Simulink curriculum, students semester is the analysis of
can verify theoretical opened to problems
concepts in a practical utilize
environment.

6 Library Having collection To meet the needs of Complete Students and staff
Dept. ofText Books, the students, semester is can refer text
Reference Books , To provide reference opened to book and have a
Journals,Project / facilities, To refer utilize better
seminar report. advanced understanding ,
information for seminar, preparing notes,
laboratory, projects,
To know about
the past research
activities undertaken by
the students

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen