Tel. Nos: 346-6666 loc.

217

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
FOR PRACTIUMERS/ON-THE-JOB-TRAINEES
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ACCOUNTANCY

Name: Marie Bernadette M. Aranas Date: April 25, 2018_______________

Name of Company: R.P. MORA CO. ACCOUNTING AND LAW OFFICE__________________________________
Period Covered of Evaluation: From April 4, 2018_________________ To April 25, 2018__________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________

Performance Evaluation is the appraisal of the accomplishment of each trainee. This will provide the occasion to
point out how well the trainee is doing his/her job and how he/she can improve it. This will also provide the
trainee the opportunity to set the job objectives in managing assigned tasks and assess achievement of
objectives.

Please rate the trainee using the following scale:

5 = Outstanding
4 = Highly Satisfactory
3 = Satisfactory
2 = Needs Improvement
1 = Unsatisfactory

I. PERFORMANCE FACTORS

1. CUSTOMER PARTNERSHIP/TEAMWORK
Works cooperatively with others; Willingness to offer
assistance; Responds positively and sensitively to the needs of 5 4 3 2 1
internal and external customers.
2. JOB KNOWLEDGE/TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE
The extent the trainee knows and understands the details and 5 4 3 2 1
the nature of his/her assigned job and related duties.
3. QUALITY OF WORK
The extent of accuracy, completeness, orderliness and ability to 5 4 3 2 1
finish assigned tasks within schedule.
4. QUANTITY OF WORK
The volume of acceptable work accomplished the ability to 5 4 3 2 1
finish assigned tasks within time schedule.
5. DEPENDABILITY
The extent to which trainee can be dependent upon to carry
out instructions, be in the job, fulfill responsibilities and ability 5 4 3 2 1
to work with minimum supervision.
6. JUDGMENT
The extent to which his/her actions are based on facts, sound 5 4 3 2 1
reasoning and good common sense.
7. ORGANIZATION
The ability to plan and organize work effectively. 5 4 3 2 1

8. INITIATIVE
The extent to which the trainee is a self-starter and is 5 4 3 2 1
continuously motivated in accomplishing his/her job.
9. INDUSTRY
The extent to which the trainee may be described as a
5 4 3 2 1
committed worker and the amount of concentration and effort
extended in the performance of his/her job.
II. PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS

10. SELF-DEVELOPMENT
Desire and initiative to improve performance and to strengthen 5 4 3 2 1
both personal and job skills.
11. DEPENDABILITY
Following instructions, procedures, policies; being on the job 5 4 3 2 1
when needed; sets a good example to co-trainees.
12. INTEGRITY
Consistency of behavior with standards of performance and 5 4 3 2 1
work ethics.
13. COOPERATION
The trainee’s working relationship with supervisor/officers/co- 5 4 3 2 1
trainee in accomplishing the tasks.
14. PERSONALITY
The trainee’s effect on others as a result of the totality of
his/her personal and social traits such as disposition, tact, 5 4 3 2 1
enthusiasm, appearance, conduct, etc.
15. GENERAL APPEARANCE AND BEARING
The trainee’s manner of carrying himself/herself,
5 4 3 2 1
appropriateness of attire and physical appearance. (neatness)

III. POTENTIAL
(Please answer the following based on your assessment of items I and II)

1. OVER-ALL QUALIFICATIONS
STRONG POINTS: _____________________________________________________________
WEAK POINTS: _______________________________________________________________
Consider such factors as self-confidence, maturity, and stability under pressure, adaptability,
flexibility, professionalism and general potential.

2. OVER-ALL POTENTIAL
a) Describe the trainee’s potential for development, considering for development, considering
his/her mental ability, leadership qualities, human relations, judgment, planning and organizing
abilities.
_____________________________________________________________________________
b) What improvement would increase his/her potential for growth?
_____________________________________________________________________________
3. OVER-ALL APPRAISAL
After considering all of the factors and weighing heavily those that have greatest bearing on the
requirements of the trainee, indicate the rating which most accurately characterizes the trainee’s
performance.

( ) POOR ( ) BELOW AVERAGE ( ) SATISFACTORY ( ) VERY GOOD ( ) EXCELLENT

__________________________________________________________________________________________
IV. Considering the over-all appraisal of our Practicumer, would you still consider accepting trainees from
the University of Cebu Lapu-Lapu and Mandaue, College of Business and Accountancy?
__________________________________________________________________________________________

REMARKS:
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________

Evaluated by: ___________________________________ Date:__________________________

Position: _______________________________________