10 30 A 11 30 Concreto Lanzado Como Sistema de Soporte Inicial PDF

r-s
Training Course on
ne
tiv nd
ow
Principles in Tunnel Design
ec rl a
e
sp e
Centro Asturiano, Mexico, D.F. 02 – 04 May 2013, 10:30 – 11:30 am
re itz
ir w
he - S
Sprayed Concrete Support System
ft n
O tio
© a
n nd
Harald Wagner, PhD.,PE
tio ou
ra F
st T
llu E
Consulting Engineer
lI C
Al ITA
ITA EXCO EXPERT

©
Bangkok Thailand / Graz Austria
www.drharaldwagner.com
Sprayed Concrete (Concreto
r-s
Lanzado) has to be
ne
tiv nd
ow
economically viable.
ec rl a
e
sp e
re itz
It shall meet the challenges
ir w
he - S
of the future of underground
ft n
space use through
O tio
© a
Technological Innovations n nd
tio ou
ra F
st T
llu E
Where appropriate, it shall

lI C
Al ITA
make use of Sprayed

©
Concrete .
Unsupported inclined access shaft in stable ground
r-s
Future Sprayed Concrete Developments
ne
tiv nd
ow
ec rl a
e
• Conventional Tunnelling with Sprayed Concrete
sp e
re itz
• Foreign Assistance in Design and Construction
ir w
he - S
• Risk Preparedness for New Technologies
ft n
O tio
• Trained Engineers and Miners
© a
• n nd
3 Main Components System Method Process
tio ou
ra F
• Sprayed Concrete in TBM Tunnelling

st T
llu E
• Steel Fibers in more widely Use

lI C
Al ITA
©
r-s
Geotechnical Conditions in
ne
mountainous conditions are
tiv nd
ow
ec rl a
characterized by
e
sp e
re itz
ir w
residual stresses,
he - S
numerous fault zones,
ft n
O tio
complex folding, and by
© a
thrust zones. n nd
tio ou
ra F
st T
Conventional Tunneling with

llu E
lI C
Sprayed Concrete
Al ITA
Is such challenged.
©
Multiple drifting in conventional tunnelling of urban vehicular tunnel
r-s
CTM Tunnel support
ne
tiv nd
elements, e.g. shotcrete,
ow
ec rl a
has been used since more
e
sp e
re itz
than 50 years in good rock.
ir w
he - S
ft n
However, successful
O tio
applications were related to
© a
Foreign Assistance in n nd
tio ou
ra F
Design and Construction.

st T
llu E
lI C
Al ITA
©
Sprayed Concrete Lining preparation for installation of membrane
r-s
ne
tiv nd
ow
ec rl a
e
sp e
New Construction Methods are faced with
re itz
ir w
resistance as they are considered to be risky and
he - S
ft n
such unwanted by decision makers.
O tio
© a
New Technologies are therefore imported until its
n nd
tio ou
success provides a safe base for decisions.
ra F
st T
llu E
lI C
Al ITA
©
r-s
ne
tiv nd
ow
The future of Sprayed Concrete in both
ec rl a
e
sp e
mountainous and urban conditions depend on
re itz
ir w
experienced teams in design and construction.
he - S
ft n
O tio
Trained Engineers and Miners need to be
© a
n nd
recruited locally and international together with
tio ou
ra F
sufficient education and training.

st T
llu E
lI C
Al ITA
©
r-s
Sprayed Concrete
ne
tiv nd
ow
of today offers for
ec rl a
e
sp e
the future a huge
re itz
ir w
potential of
he - S
Innovation,
ft n
O tio
consisting of 3 main
© a
components. n nd
tio ou
ra F
st T
llu E
lI C
Al ITA
©
Sprayed Concrete face wall and break through from adverse tunnel site.
r-s
ne
In full excavation, partial
tiv nd
ow
and full mechanized
ec rl a
e
tunnel systems have a
sp e
re itz
potential for future
ir w
he - S
development.
ft n
O tio
© a
Sprayed Concrete
n nd
tio ou
Application Systems will
ra F
be permanently installed
st T
llu E
on Tunnel Boring
lI C
Al ITA
Machines.
©
Portal wall with center drift excavation between side wall galleries.
r-s
ne
tiv nd
ow
Future developments in Sprayed Concrete
ec rl a
e
sp e
Technology include
re itz
ir w
he - S
Wet Processed Shotcrete and the use of
ft n
O tio
Steel Fibers for Reinforcement
© a
n nd
tio ou
ra F
in combination with conventional reinforcing steel

st T
llu E
lI C
bars.
Al ITA
©
©
Al ITA
lI C
llu E
st T
ra F
tio ou
n nd
© a
O tio
ft n
he - S
ir w
re itz
HRT Heading Status

sp e
ec rl a
tiv nd
e
ow
ne
r-s
Case History RAMPUR HEP/HRT (Himalaya/India)
r-s
ne
tiv nd
ow
GE-1
PACKA
ec rl a
e
sp e
re itz
43.2 M LONG CUT & COVER
ir w
CRITICA
E- L RE
5899 M ACH
ST
he - S
21
KA
AT
M
3107
85
NJHPS 1500 MW
IO
C
N
M
PA
10.5 M Ø 15.08 KM LONG HRT
12
ft n
KAJO ADIT
90
795 M LONG
O tio
KUNNI ADIT
0
OW
M
593.89 M LONG
FL RAMPUR INTAKE AT
© a
SURGE SHAFT TRT OUTFALL OF NJHPS
M
n nd
81
11 RAMPUR INTAKE TUNNEL 10.50 M Ø 484 M
4M 5M LONG
tio ou
1 72 290
CONSTRUCTION ADIT CUM
TRT
ra F
SPILL TUNNEL
2M 10.15 M HORSE SHOE SHAPE 335 M LONG
46
st T
GOSHAI ADIT
1089.60 M LONG
llu E
POWER HOUSE
lI C
COMPLEX
BAEL ADIT
Al ITA
578 M LONG
©
ER
SATLUJ RIV
BEST AVERAGE RATE OF PROGRESS ACHIEVED
r-s
ne
tiv nd
ow
ec rl a
AVERAGE RATE OF EXCAVATION 80 M /MONTH
e
sp e
re itz
IN HEADING
ir w
he - S
ft n
O tio
© a
IN BENCHING
n nd
tio ou
ra F
st T
AVERAGE RATE FOR CONCRETE 220 M /MONTH

llu E
lI C
LINING (OVERT)
Al ITA
©
AVERAGE RATE FOR CONCRETE 500 M/MONTH

LINING (INVERT)
OVERALL AVERAGE RATE OF PROGRESS ACHIEVED
r-s
ne
tiv nd
ow
ec rl a
e
sp e
IN HEADING
re itz
ir w
he - S
ft n
O tio
IN BENCHING
© a
n nd
tio ou
ra F
AVERAGE RATE FOR CONCRETE 200 M

st T
llu E
LINING (OVERT) /MONTH

lI C
Al ITA
©
AVERAGE RATE FOR CONCRETE 325 M/MONTH

LINING (INVERT)
r-s
ANTICIPATED AVERAGE RATE OF PROGRESS
ne
WITH IMPROVED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
tiv nd
ow
ec rl a
e
sp e
re itz
ir w
IN HEADING
he - S
ft n
O tio
AVERAGE RATE OF EXCAVATION 200M /MONTH
© a
IN BENCHING n nd
tio ou
ra F
AVERAGE RATE FOR CONCRETE 250 M /MONTH

st T
llu E
lI C
LINING (OVERT)
Al ITA
©
AVERAGE RATE FOR CONCRETE 500M /MONTH

LINING (INVERT)
r-s
ne
tiv nd
ow
Current Status
ec rl a
e
sp e
re itz
925
ir w
4546 9638
he - S
ft n
O tio
2898 3239 2846 3106 2418 277
© a
n nd
tio ou
BAYAL GOSHAI KASHOLI KUNNI KAJO SPILL
ra F
st T
Total Heading Completed : 14184 m , 93.45 %

llu E
lI C
Asking rate in critical reach :- 60.20 m/month/face

Al ITA
©
©
Al ITA
lI C
llu E
st T
ra F
tio ou
n nd
© a
O tio
ft n
he - S
ir w
re itz
sp e
ec rl a
tiv nd
e
ow
ne
r-s
Head Race Tunnel (HRT) Benching Condition
©
Al ITA
lI C
llu E
st T
ra F
tio ou
n nd
© a
O tio
ft n
he - S
ir w
re itz
sp e
ec rl a
tiv nd
e
HRT – Final Lining Condition
ow
ne
r-s
Kasholi D/s Heavy Water Seepage @ 22 litres/sec.
r-s
ne
tiv nd
ow
ec rl a
e
sp e
re itz
ir w
he - S
ft n
O tio
© a
n nd
tio ou
ra F
st T
llu E
lI C
Al ITA
©
Excavation & Installation of Support in conditions of strong water infiltration.
Goshai U/s Cavity. ( RD 1243m)
r-s
ne
tiv nd
ow
ec rl a
e
sp e
re itz
ir w
he - S
ft n
O tio
© a
n nd
tio ou
ra F
st T
llu E
lI C
Al ITA
©
Mud flow causing cave in due to weak shotcrete primary lining

Pipe roofing in Goshai HRT U/s
r-s
ne
tiv nd
ow
ec rl a
e
sp e
re itz
ir w
he - S
ft n
O tio
© a
n nd
tio ou
ra F
st T
llu E
lI C
Al ITA
©
Lining support consisting of shotcrete and pipe roofing
DEFORMATION IN MM
-20.000
0.000
20.000
40.000
60.000
80.000
100.000
120.000
140.000
08.09.09
© 11.09.09
16.09.09
19.09.09
Al ITA
lI C 20.09.09
llu E 23.09.09
24.09.09
04.10.09
st T
06.10.09
ra F
08.10.09
tio ou
12.10.09
15.10.09
n nd
© a
21.10.09
23.10.09
O tio
30.10.09
ft n
02.11.09
he - S
06.11.09 ir w
DATE 09.11.09
13.11.09
re itz
16.11.09
sp e
24.11.09
AFTER HEADING
26.11.09
ec rl a
30.11.09
tiv nd
03.12.09
e
07.12.09
10.12.09
ow
14.12.09
ne
01.01.10
AT GOSHAI HRT UPSTREAM RD:229.5M
06.01.10
r-s
18.01.10
30.01.10
02.04.10
DEFORMATION CURVE MEASURED BY PAPER TARGET
AB
AC
BC
r-s
DEFORMATION CURVE MEASURED BY SPBX AT GOSHAI HRT
ne
tiv nd
UPSTREAM RD:230M
ow
ec rl a
AFTER BENCHING
e
sp e
160.00
re itz
DEFORMATION IN MM
140.00
ir w
he - S
120.00
100.00
ft n
O tio
80.00
© a
LEFT SIDE AT SPL
n nd
60.00
LEFT CROWN
tio ou
40.00
CENTER CROWN
ra F
20.00 RIGHT CROWN

st T
0.00 RIGHT SIDE AT SPL

llu E
lI C
-20.00
Al ITA
11.06.2011
15.06.2010
20.06.2011
24.06.2011
02.07.2011
08.07.2011
16.07.2011
23.07.2011
30.07.2011
01.08.2011
06.08.2011
10.08.2011
13.08.2011
19.08.2011
24.08.2011
28.08.2011
01.09.2011
05.09.2011
09.09.2011
16.09.2011
24.09.2011
©
DATE
Primary Lining Support Efforts with insufficient effect.
r-s
ne
tiv nd
ow
ec rl a
e
sp e
re itz
ir w
he - S
ft n
O tio
© a
n nd
tio ou
ra F
st T
llu E
lI C
Al ITA
©
Vertical support provided RD 1370m-1400m U/S HRT Bayal.
Primary Lining of shotcrete and steel arches
r-s
ne
tiv nd
ow
ec rl a
e
sp e
re itz
ir w
he - S
ft n
O tio
© a
n nd
tio ou
ra F
st T
llu E
lI C
Al ITA
©
Squeezing rock conditions encountered at Kunni D/s
Installation of support with Ribs & Lagging
r-s
ne
tiv nd
ow
ec rl a
e
sp e
re itz
ir w
he - S
ft n
O tio
© a
n nd
tio ou
ra F
st T
llu E
lI C
Al ITA
©
Rock desintegration and loosening due to slow lining installation (Kunni D/s)
©
Al ITA
lI C
llu E
st T
ra F
tio ou
n nd
© a
O tio
ft n
he - S
ir w
re itz
sp e
ec rl a
tiv nd
e
ow
ne
r-s
Tunnelling with Backhoe and Shotcrete Support
©
Al ITA
lI C
llu E
st T
ra F
tio ou
n nd
© a
O tio
ft n
he - S
ir w
re itz
sp e
ec rl a
tiv nd
e
ow
ne
r-s
Top Heading / Bench Excavation
©
Al ITA
lI C
llu E
st T
ra F
tio ou
n nd
© a
O tio
ft n
he - S
ir w
re itz
sp e
ec rl a
tiv nd
e
ow
ne
Shotcreting primary lining and face protection
r-s
©
Al ITA
lI C
llu E
st T
ra F
tio ou
n nd
© a
O tio
ft n
he - S
ir w
re itz
sp e
ec rl a
tiv nd
e
ow
ne
r-s
Invert excavation stages and construction of closed ring
©
Al ITA
lI C
llu E
st T
ra F
tio ou
n nd
© a
O tio
ft n
he - S
ir w
re itz
sp e
ec rl a
tiv nd
e
ow
ne
r-s
©
Al ITA
lI C
llu E
st T
ra F
tio ou
n nd
© a
O tio
ft n
he - S
ir w
re itz
sp e
ec rl a
tiv nd
e
ow
ne
r-s
©
Al ITA
lI C
llu E
st T
ra F
tio ou
n nd
© a
O tio
ft n
he - S
ir w
re itz
sp e
ec rl a
tiv nd
e
ow
ne
r-s
r-s
ne
tiv nd
ow
ec rl a
Ground is viewed as integrated element of support
e
sp e
re itz
Ground reactions narrow measured to check stability
ir w
he - S
ft n
Shotcrete essential to keep the ground undisturbed
O tio
© a
n nd
Support Design between RAPID RIGID & SLIM DEFORMABLE
tio ou
ra F
Type of support to allow most economical design

st T
llu E
lI C
Support installation on ground classification system

Al ITA
©
Contractor & Engineer need to agree on support installation
r-s
ne
Principles in Tunneling Design
tiv nd
ow
ec rl a
e
Mexico, D.F. 02 – 04 May 2013
sp e
re itz
ir w
he - S
Disclaimer
ft n
O tio
© a
a) The speakers are presenting their own personal views and are not expressing the view
of the Foundation. n nd
tio ou
ra F
b) Papers and documents displayed or handed out during the Event are copyrighted. The participants
st T
llu E
must observe and comply with all applicable law regulations concerning the copyright.
lI C
Al ITA
©

10 30 A 11 30 Concreto Lanzado Como Sistema de Soporte Inicial PDF

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

10 30 A 11 30 Concreto Lanzado Como Sistema de Soporte Inicial PDF

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

r-s

ITA EXCO EXPERT

Bangkok Thailand / Graz Austria

Where appropriate, it shall

make use of Sprayed

• Sprayed Concrete in TBM Tunnelling

• Steel Fibers in more widely Use

Conventional Tunneling with

Multiple drifting in conventional tunnelling of urban vehicular tunnel

Design and Construction.

Sprayed Concrete Lining preparation for installation of membrane

sufficient education and training.

in combination with conventional reinforcing steel

HRT Heading Status

AVERAGE RATE FOR CONCRETE 220 M /MONTH

AVERAGE RATE FOR CONCRETE 500 M/MONTH

AVERAGE RATE FOR CONCRETE 200 M

LINING (OVERT) /MONTH

AVERAGE RATE FOR CONCRETE 325 M/MONTH

AVERAGE RATE FOR CONCRETE 250 M /MONTH

AVERAGE RATE FOR CONCRETE 500M /MONTH

Total Heading Completed : 14184 m , 93.45 %

Asking rate in critical reach :- 60.20 m/month/face

Excavation & Installation of Support in conditions of strong water infiltration.

Mud flow causing cave in due to weak shotcrete primary lining

Lining support consisting of shotcrete and pipe roofing

20.00 RIGHT CROWN

0.00 RIGHT SIDE AT SPL

Vertical support provided RD 1370m-1400m U/S HRT Bayal.

Squeezing rock conditions encountered at Kunni D/s

Type of support to allow most economical design

Support installation on ground classification system

Contractor & Engineer need to agree on support installation

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen