1 views

Uploaded by V B Shiva Prasad

© All Rights Reserved

- Mechanics of Materials Solutions Chapter09 Probs1 10
- Lateral Buckling in Steel I Section Bridge Girder by U Frame
- COMMENTARY AND WORKED EXAMPLES EN 1993-1-5.pdf
- Strength Analysis of Hull Structures in Tankers
- ch13
- Lateral Torsional Buckling of Channels
- Basic Steel Design (1)
- Paper-Self Supported Cone Roof
- Corroded Beam MDOT Steel Beam End Deterioration Report
- Composite Deck Bridges
- Design-procedure-for-crane-runway-girders_bk105.pdf
- Strength of Columns Under Combined Bending and Thrust. 1951
- Chapter five, plate girders.doc
- A-1081
- Narayan_Pokharel_Thesis.pdf
- Design of Beams
- Ultimate strength design of longitudinally stiffened plate panels.pdf
- Design of Steel W in Biaxial Flexure.pdf
- MAterial- Ch45
- Postbuckling and Vibration of Linearly Elastic and Softening Columns under Self-weight.pdf

You are on page 1of 3

Design of

Cruciform Sections

using BS 5950-1:2000

Many engineers will be relatively unfamiliar with torsional modes of buckling, but they are

explicitly covered in the Eurocodes. Steel Construction Institute Senior Manager Charles King

explains what designers of bi-symmetric cruciform sections need to know about buckling.

TORSIONAL BUCKLING A good question is, “If I’ve never heard of these

modes, can they be important?” The answer is that

1.1 Who’s heard of torsional modes of buckling? these buckling modes are not the critical modes in

There are several modes of buckling that affect the most commonly used compression members

structures. Most structural engineers are familiar with the most common restraint arrangements.

with: Structural hollow sections have such high

torsional stiffness that torsional modes cannot be

1. Flexural buckling, commonly referred to as the critical modes in normal sections. Torsional

strut buckling, column buckling, compression modes will not be critical in bi-symmetric I-sections

Fig1. Plain Cruciform buckling or Euler buckling to distinguish it (eg UCs) with both flanges restrained at the same

from the buckling of a beam due to a bending points along a member. However, where the flanges

moment. are not equally restrained, torsional modes may be

2. Lateral torsional buckling, commonly referred the critical modes.

to as beam buckling For all other sections, torsional modes are

3. Plate buckling, which one might expect in likely to be the critical modes. In the case of angles,

slender components of box girders channels and tees, this is effectively allowed for

4. Shear buckling, which is a type of plate in BS 5950-1 by the slenderness calculations to

buckling 4.7.10 and Table 25. For other mono-symmetric

5. Local buckling, which is a common term for or asymmetric sections, most codes give no

plate buckling modes that might occur in assistance. With the evolution of steel structures

members. towards more exotic structural forms, designers

need to be aware of these other modes. It is

Many structural engineers working with hot-rolled especially worth noting that in an I-section with

members or fabricated plate members are less different flanges, torsional-flexural buckling is

familiar with, or are even unaware of, torsional commonly the lowest mode.

modes of buckling. Design codes for orthodox

structures commonly do not explicitly mention 1.3 What do these modes look like?

these modes. However, codes do cover such Torsional modes of buckling are commonly divided

modes; for example the checks in Annex G of BS into two categories:

5950 1:2000 are for buckling modes that are close

relatives of the torsional and torsional-flexural 1. Torsional buckling

buckling modes described in this article. Torsional 2. Torsional-flexural buckling

modes of buckling are explicitly covered in the

Eurocodes. Cruciform sections and similar sections all have

Torsional buckling modes are better known to a torsional buckling mode, as shown in Figures

engineers designing cold-formed members, where 3 and 4.

these modes are often critical, and are addressed by Asymmetric sections are all prone to torsional-

design codes. flexural buckling, as shown in Figure 5. Indeed, it

This article is written to assist in the design of is common for torsional-flexural buckling to be the

bi-symmetric cruciform sections, as shown in Figure critical mode of buckling, more onerous than pure

1 and Figure 2. Such sections are prone to torsional minor axis buckling (Figure 5)

buckling, but not to torsional-flexural buckling Sections in which the shear centre does NOT

Fig 2. Flanged Cruciform because the centroid of the section coincides with coincide with the centroid will be prone to torsional-

the shear centre. flexural buckling and this should be expected to be

Technical

Fig 3. Plain Cruciform deforming in the torsional mode Fig 4. Asymmetric section Fig 5. Plain cruciform

the critical mode of buckling for a given effective section C.1. The procedure in Annex C can be

length. Sections in which the shear centre DOES adapted to check other modes of buckling by using

coincide with the centroid will NOT be prone to the elastic critical stress of the mode of buckling

torsional-flexural buckling. considered in place of the elastic critical stress from

This article is intended for the design of bi- the usual flexural mode.

symmetric cruciform sections. In these sections, the To avoid having to use Annex C to calculate

shear centre coincides with the centroid so they are pc from pE, it is more convenient to calculate the

NOT prone to torsional-flexural buckling. equivalent slenderness, λ, from the equation in

Annex C and then find pc directly from tables in the

1.4 What should a designer do? Standard.

Designers would be wise to avoid the problem Annex C gives pE = p2E/λ2. Therefore, λ can be

wherever possible by using appropriate sections

and restraint arrangements. It is simplest to resist found from λ = π 2E

pE

compression either by UCs with both flanges .

equally restrained or by hollow sections. This allows the designer to use Table 24 of

If you cannot avoid the problem, calculate the BS 5950-1:2000 to find pc easily.

compressive strengths for the torsional modes and

compare these with the compressive strength for 2.2 Torsional buckling

flexural buckling. Then calculate the compression The elastic critical load for torsional buckling can

resistance of the member using the lowest be found in classic references such as Timoshenko,

compressive strength and continue with the normal Strength of Materials, Part 2 or Timoshenko and

codified design procedures. Gere, Theory of Elastic Stability. The elastic critical

buckling stress is simply [elastic critical load]/area.

2. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH Using symbols in BS 5950-1,

The “elastic critical buckling stress” is the stress at

pE =

1

I0 ( GJ +

n2π2

L2

EH

)

which the member would buckle if it had an infinite- where

ly high yield stress and no imperfections. Engineers I0 is the polar moment of area with respect

learn about Euler buckling during their studies and to the shear centre of the section. For

learn that the Euler buckling load of a strut is bi-symmetric cruciform sections, I0 = Ix + Iy .

π2EI G is the torsional modulus

PE =

L2

E E E

The Euler buckling stress is the elastic critical pE = = =

buckling stress of the strut for flexural buckling. In 2(1+v) 2(1+ 0.3) 2.6

the case of Euler buckling, this can be written using

BS 5950 1 symbols as J is the torsional constant.

pE =

PE

=

( )

π2EI

L2

=

π2E ( ) A

I

=

( )

π2E r 2

=

π 2E

For flanged cruciforms comprising two rolled

sections, J is the sum of the J values of the

component rolled sections.

(L/r )

2

A A L2 L2

n is the number of half-sine waves along

Codes use the elastic critical buckling stress to the outstands of the member. For members

find the compressive strength of a member. In restrained at both ends, this should be taken

BS 5950-1:2000, this can be seen in Annex C, as 1.0 unless you are sure you can prove it is

Technical

greater. For cantilever columns this should not 3.2 Plain cruciform sections

be taken as greater than 0.5. It is recommended that the derivation of the

L is the length of the member slenderness for plain cruciform sections, as shown

E is Young’s modulus in Figure 1, is calculated assuming that the section is

and Class 3 and that designers proceed as follows:

H is the warping constant. For bi-symmetric cru-

ciform sections such as in Figures 1 and 2, this 1. Calculate the elastic critical stress for lateral

is the sum of the warping constants, H, for the torsional buckling for members with no warping

two component sections. H for a plain cruciform stiffness (such as a plain cruciform), which is:

( )

is very small, so it is recommended that H is π

taken as zero. L EIyGJ

Mcr

pE = =

Zx Zx

The formula for members with no warping stiffness

(such as a plain cruciform) reduces to: 2. Calculate the slenderness, λLT, from the equation

in Annex B relating pE to slenderness, λLT, which can

1

pE = GJ be re-arranged as

I0 π 2E

λLT = pE

.

2.3 Selection of the buckling curve 3. Use Table 17 of BS 5950-1:2000 to find pb.

Where there is a torsional component to the buck-

ling, the buckling involves flexure of the flanges

similar to minor axis buckling of the component 4. DETAILING CRUCIFORM SECTIONS

parts of the member. Therefore the buckling curve

should be selected from Table 23 of BS 5950-1:2000 Where the failure mode is by flexural buckling about

for the components as shown in Figure 6. one of the rectangular axes of the cruciform, the

For example, a flanged cruciform made from UB I-section that is on the axis of flexure relies on the

sections designed to other I-section for stability. If the web of the I-section

BS 5950-1:2000 would that is on the axis of flexure is neither stiff enough

use curves (b) or (c) nor strong enough to make the flanges on the axis

depending on the of flexure deflect in the same shape as expected for

thickness of the flange the whole, then these flanges will deflect more and

being less than or will unload, reducing the resistance of the cruciform.

Fig 6. Similarity between torsional buckling and flexural greater than 40mm. A The simple way to avoid this problem is to

buckling about the minor axis of the component parts plain cruciform section add gussets between the webs and flanges (so that

would also use curves all the elements are connected) at centres such

(b) or (c) depending on the thickness of the flange that the slenderness about the minor axis of the I-

being less than or greater than 40mm. sections (taking an effective length factor of 1.0) is

not greater than the slenderness of the full length

cruciform. A possible arrangement is shown in

3. BENDING STRENGTH OF Figures 7 and 8.

CRUCIFORM SECTIONS

bending moment, both axial and bending resistance

are required. The axial resistance should be checked

as above. The bending resistance can be calculated

using the advice in the following sections. Note that

the following advice is limited to bi-symmetric sec-

tions (torsional-flexural buckling is not critical). A

subsequent article will show how torsional flexural

Fig 7.

buckling can be calculated for other sections

The bending strength of flanged cruciform sections

is most conveniently found by calculating the slen-

derness, λLT, using the method in BS 5950-1:2000. It

is recommended that when using Annex B, section

B.2.3, the value of gamma, g, is taken as 1.0 because

the value given in Annex B was derived for single

I-sections. It is also recommended that values of “u”

and “x” are calculated using the formula given for

channels with equal flanges to avoid assumptions

made for single I-sections. Tables 16 or 17 can then

be used as for lateral torsional buckling of single I- Fig 8.

sections.

- Mechanics of Materials Solutions Chapter09 Probs1 10Uploaded byArishChoy
- Lateral Buckling in Steel I Section Bridge Girder by U FrameUploaded bycleyber navarro
- COMMENTARY AND WORKED EXAMPLES EN 1993-1-5.pdfUploaded bytoliveira80
- Strength Analysis of Hull Structures in TankersUploaded byMahdi
- ch13Uploaded byPriyanka Cholleti
- Lateral Torsional Buckling of ChannelsUploaded bylee
- Basic Steel Design (1)Uploaded byShalini Mustala
- Paper-Self Supported Cone RoofUploaded byAnonymous wWOWz9UnW
- Corroded Beam MDOT Steel Beam End Deterioration ReportUploaded bysebastian9033
- Composite Deck BridgesUploaded bykarpagajothimurugan
- Design-procedure-for-crane-runway-girders_bk105.pdfUploaded byFWICIP
- Strength of Columns Under Combined Bending and Thrust. 1951Uploaded byfefahim
- Chapter five, plate girders.docUploaded byZeleke Taemu
- A-1081Uploaded byOscar Eustáchio
- Narayan_Pokharel_Thesis.pdfUploaded byDip Roshan Chaudhary
- Design of BeamsUploaded byPraveen Cyssan
- Ultimate strength design of longitudinally stiffened plate panels.pdfUploaded bytboy3644
- Design of Steel W in Biaxial Flexure.pdfUploaded byCésar Cristóbal Pino Guzmán
- MAterial- Ch45Uploaded byhemant_durgawale
- Postbuckling and Vibration of Linearly Elastic and Softening Columns under Self-weight.pdfUploaded bystormstone
- jawad1980.pdfUploaded byJoão Paulo Vissotto
- Compression Member edited.pptxUploaded byAbdul Aziz
- Beams FlexureUploaded bytakderakhty
- Miller_Thesis.pdfUploaded bymartin
- bdp_6Uploaded byJohn Jennings
- 40 Steel Foam Tube MoradiUploaded byGishella Hilmiansyah
- question Bank.pdfUploaded bysandip kumar
- IJEIT1412201212_61.pdfUploaded bySheikh Aziz
- 110CE0060 DESIGN TOOLSUploaded byviraj pardeshi
- Structures Report FinalUploaded byGhassan Mousa

- Turkey-India Relations in the 21st CenturyUploaded byozkan82
- 2974_4Uploaded byV B Shiva Prasad
- DECKING DATA2Uploaded byV B Shiva Prasad
- DECKING DATAUploaded byV B Shiva Prasad
- UB as ColumnsUploaded bysuvra
- Comparison of Design Procedures for Pre Engineering Buildings PEB a Case StudyUploaded byMohit Natu
- An Overview of Banking Sector in IndiaUploaded byHjhjj Nbvbnvb Kuiiuiu
- 2016 17 Chilakamarthi Panchangam (1)Uploaded byV B Shiva Prasad
- form35Uploaded byRohit Jain
- ErectionUploaded byV B Shiva Prasad
- Delivery NoteUploaded bynature75
- EC4 COMPOSITE STRUCTURESUploaded byV B Shiva Prasad
- CorbelUploaded byV B Shiva Prasad
- 12118-46438-1-PB (1)Uploaded byV B Shiva Prasad
- All ProductsUploaded byV B Shiva Prasad
- DG 2 EnglishUploaded byÁlló László
- Declaration FormUploaded byrajesh98765
- Banking Terminology - Guide4BankExamsUploaded bysampath
- Masonry Reinforcement and WindpostsUploaded byJessi Johnson
- Understanding Dynamic Analysis v8Uploaded byM Refaat Fath
- SpecsUploaded byV B Shiva Prasad
- DesignUploaded byV B Shiva Prasad
- Royal Enfield Himalayan OdysseyUploaded byV B Shiva Prasad
- 37023454 Tower FoundationUploaded bykurtcobain12
- Who Gains From WarUploaded byapi-3738026

- Machine Design14Uploaded byJm Beja
- Flux Enhancement by Shear Free Surfaces in a Turbulent ConvectionUploaded byIJSTR Research Publication
- NUS PC1431 Lecture 0 Introduction (new).pptUploaded bySre Vinod
- Large Fog Collectors New Strategies for Collection Efficiency and Structural Response to Wind Pressure 2015 Atmospheric ResearchUploaded byChristian
- Enhancement of Heat Transfer in Tube-In-tube Heat Exchangers Using Twisted InsertsUploaded byijrdt
- Ch 27Uploaded byMark Reyes
- Attitude Filtering on SO3Uploaded byalvaroroman92
- Frame Saw Manual 1902Uploaded bywolf143
- 2.2.a.lecture Gianluca AntonelliUploaded byЋирка Фејзбуџарка
- Lab ReportUploaded byMacky Novera
- 9654_ch_09Uploaded byAnonymous LFgO4WbID
- 184_Kurt.pdfUploaded byRafael Borelli
- Slab Base DesignUploaded bySurja Gain
- LAB 1 FORMAL MEASUREMNET.docxUploaded byRedza Rabani Rosli
- Quick Revision of Bio Phy Che 9 HoursUploaded bycbsegirlsaipmt
- M1 Kinematics of a Particle Moving in a Straight LineUploaded bySolar Warden
- Nondimensionalization of Ns EquationUploaded byMajid Sedighi
- Wind Loads UK Portal Frame WEUploaded bymandregomes
- Hydraulics for MechatronicsUploaded byDaramola Ayotope
- Investigation into the Physics of Ship Capsizing by combined captive and free-running model tests.pdfUploaded byHosein Nowruzi
- AIEEE 2012 Information BrochureUploaded bysd11123
- Vibration MeasurementUploaded byAngielo U. Comia
- Thermodynamic Property Predictions With the Trebble-Bishnoi EOSUploaded byGeorge Missak
- 1stLE Lecture 07 - R3 Projectile MotionUploaded byGreen NigNugget
- Gate 2012 Model question Papers for Mechanical engineering ( www.studentscrunch.cmo )Uploaded byStu Dents
- 75183504-Hydraulic-Bench-and-Accessories.docUploaded byAngeline Paguirigan Dionicio
- 8 Turbdesign MultistageUploaded byAneeq Raheem
- Chapter 9 Center of Gravity, Center of Mass AndUploaded byAnonymous uVgybS8
- Human Motor & Boussingault# J AmarUploaded byAlberto Navas
- Deo et al. 2007 Experimental Investigations of the Effect of Reynolds Number on a Plane JetUploaded byDr Ravinesh C Deo