Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SPE 1556
651
W
Wettabilitty and Oil Recove
ery by Low
w Salinity
y Injectio
on
B
Behruz Shake
er Shiran and Arne Skaugee,
U
Uni CIPR and
d Univ. of Berg
gen, Norway
C
Copyright 2012, Society
y of Petroleum Enginee
ers
T
This paper was prepare
ed for presentation at the SPE EOR Conferen
nce at Oil and Gas We
est Asia held in Muscatt, Oman, 16–18 April 2
2012.
T
This paper was selected for presentation by an a SPE program comm mittee following review of information containned in an abstract submmitted by the author(s)). Contents of the papeer have not been
re
eviewed by the Society y of Petroleum Engine eers and are subject to o correction by the autthor(s). The material ddoes not necessarily reeflect any position of the Society of Petroleu
um Engineers, its
officers, or members. Electronic
E reproductionn, distribution, or stora
age of any part of thiss paper without the wrritten consent of the S Society of Petroleum E Engineers is prohibite
ed. Permission to
re
eproduce in print is res
stricted to an abstract of
o not more than 300 words;
w illustrations mayy not be copied. The abbstract must contain co
onspicuous acknowled dgment of SPE copyrig ght.
AAbstract
LLow salinity haas been studied d extensively, but still the mechanisms for improved oil recovery by loowering brine ssalinity are
uunsolved. The target of this paper
p was to address
a oblem and makke systematic studies that caan give insight to the key
this pro
mmechanisms. Given
G the varietty of condition
ns under which h increased reccovery by low salinity brine iinjection may oor may not
bbe observed, itt is likely that more than onee mechanism is contributing to the observeed oil recoveryy. The mechannisms most
cclaimed to bee the reason for improved d oil recovery y are shift inn wettability, multi-componnent ion exchhange, and
ddissolution/finees migration.
Introduction
DDuring the lastt decade, low salinity
s brine in
njection or smart waterfloodiing has been ggiven a great atttention as a nnew tertiary
ooil recovery method.
m The prrimary reported d observationss of low saliniity brine effectt on oil recovvery goes backk to Martin
((1957) and Berrnard (1967), where
w they attriibuted the increeased oil recovvery to improveed microscopicc sweep efficieency due to
mmobilization off clay fines and
d consequent plugging
p of porre throats and iincrease in diffferential pressuure. Three decaades later a
nnew phase of reesearch activitiies initiated to optimize the composition off injected waterr during waterfflooding and thhe its effect
oon oil recovey improvement. The literaturee on low salin nity waterfloodding has increaasingly becom me rich in last few years,
MMorrow and Buckley
B (2011), Jadhunandan n, et al. (1995)), Tang et al. ((1997 , 1999 aand 2002), Yilldiz and Morroow (1996),
MMorrow et al. (1998), Sharm ma and Filico (1998), Roberrtson et al. (20003), Webb ett al. (2004 andd 2005), Mc G Guire et al.
((2005), Zhang and Morrow (2006),
( Lager et al. (2006 anda 2007), Jeraauld et al. (2006), Alotaibi eet al. (2009), A Alagic and
SSkauge (2010),, Ashraf et al. (2010), Austaad et al. (2010)), Yousef, et aal. (2011) and Gamage and T Thyne (2011) are among
nnumerous repo orted studies during
d last 10--15 years. In these studies different posssible mechanissms behind loow salinity
wwaterflooding process
p have been reported bu ut not well undderstood yet.
Wettability alteration of clay minerals as a result of multi-ion exchange, double layer expansion, pH increase and its effect on
reduction of interfacial tension and fine migration, has been reported as main contributor to increased oil recovery in low
salinity waterflooding (Ashraf, 2010 and Yousef, 2011).
The reported potential for improved oil recovery with low salinity waterflooding ranging from 2-42% depending on crude oil,
brine and rock type and compositions (Gamage and Thyne, 2011). Lager et al. (2006) reported up to 18% tertiary mode
increase in recovery over high salinity flood during low salinity flooding for 18 reservoir sandstones. Yousef, et al. (2011)
performed a sequential injection of various diluted sea water in carbonate reservoir core plugs. They reported additional oil
recovery of 7-8.5% with twice diluted sea water (~ 29000 ppm) and another additional recovery of 9-10% with 10 times
diluted sea water (~6000 ppm). Some reported results of low salinity waterflooding from field trials are also promising
(Webb et al., 2004 and Mc Guire et al., 2005).
Literature also reports some low salinity waterfloodings with no increased oil recovery. Studies by Gamage and Thyne
(2011) showed 3-4% increased oil recovery in tertiary mode low salinity injection for Berea cores while the incremental
recovery for Minnelusa reservoir core plugs was zero.
The objective of this work was to study the effect of low salinity brine on oil recovery of sandstone core plugs with different
wettability states. Experiments were performed on Berea and Bentheimer outcrop core plugs at room temperature. Although
the literature of low salinity waterflooding contains numerous experimental results on Berea sandstones, but to our
knowledge, it lacks data on low salinity waterflooding in Bentheimer sandstones and hopefully this work will add such a data
to the low salinity injection literature.
Fluid Properties
Synthetic sea water (SSW) used primarily for saturation and establishing connate water purposes in core plugs as well as to
displace oil in wettability and flow experiments. SSW prepared from dissolving of different salts in distilled water such that
the total dissolved solids was about 36000 ppm. Table 1 lists the composition of synthetic sea water used in this study.
Synthetic sea water also was diluted by factor of 10 to prepare low salinity water (Lsal) which was used as a tertiary recovery
fluid after secondary SSW waterflooding.
The initial water saturation (Swi) of core plugs was attained by injection of high viscosity mineral oil called Marcol 152.
After establishing of Swi in all core plugs, Marcol 152 was replaced by another mineral oil, n-decane. This mineral oil was
also used to measure oil permeability of core plugs at initial water saturation.
The North Sea stock tank oil (filtered) used as a crude oil for aging of core plugs and as the oil phase in flow experiments.
The viscosity of this crude oil is in the range of 50-55 cP. Compared to sea water which has a viscosity of only 1 cP, the
mobility ratio is highly unfavorable. In order to achieve a more effective displacement situation both in wettability tests and
flow experiments, the crude oil was diluted by addition of Xylene to reach a favorable viscosity. Table 2 illustrates some
properties of the injection fluids used in this experimental work at 22 °C.
S
SPE 151515 3
T
Table 2. Properrties of fluids used
u in experim
mental work.
CCore Plugs
TTwo different rock materialss were selected d in this studyy to perform w wettability and flow experim ments. Outcrop Berea and
BBentheimer corre plugs (6cm in length and 3.75 cm in diaameter) were ccut from wholee cores and plaaced in oven att 70 °C for
aabout 48 hours. The dried corres were then mounted
m indiv
vidually in an EExxon type corre holder, and overburden prressure was
sset to be 20 barrs. Vacuum pum mp was used to evacuate air from core sam mples. When a reasonable vaccuum pressure (<0.5 torr)
eestablished, corre plugs were saturated with h synthetic sea water (SSW) using Quizix pump’s constaant rate deliverry mode at
vvery low flow rate,
r until the pore
p pressure reached
r 5 bars,, then pump’s m mode changedd to constant prressure deliveryy mode for
22-3 hours to en nsure 100% saaturation of co ore with brine. Porosity of thhe cores was ddetermined froom the pump rreading for
innjected brine volume
v into the core plugs ass well as the weight
w differennce of the saturrated and driedd cores. The tw
wo porosity
eestimations werre quite similarr.
AAfter porosity measurement, sea water waas injected into o the cores at 5 different floow rates and ddifferential preessure was
rrecorded acrosss the cores usiing data acquissition system. Core saturatioon and all flow
w experiments were performeed at room
temperature (~ ~ 22 °C). The schematic illu ustration of exxperimental seet up used forr permeabilityy measurementt and flow
eexperiments is shown in Figuure 1.
F
Figure 1. Schem
matic of the expe
erimental setup
T
Table 3. Physiccal properties of
o core plugs ussed in experim
mental work.
Ko@swi (md) Ko@swi (m
md)
Rock type Core ID Length (cm) Diameter
D (cm) PV
V(ml) Φ (%PV) K(md) Swi(frac. PV)
before aging after aginng
B1-unaged 5.98 3.69 155.88 24.43 2691.87 0..13 2556.887 -
B2-2-weeks aged 6.04 3.70 166.70 25.72 2247.38 0..10 1876.999 1576.122
B3-unaged 5.97 3.70 166.44 25.68 2378.88 0..13 2157.113 -
Bentheimer
B4-2-weeks aged 5.84 3.70 166.02 25.48 2279.71 0..12 1943.880 1566.900
B8-1-week aged 5.89 3.76 155.85 24.24 2135.60 0..12 1813.443 1553.322
B9-1-week aged 5.87 3.75 155.40 23.75 1878.96 0..09 1743.441 1425.744
B14-B15-unaged 11.75 3.75 300.63 23.63 2252.12 0..10 2108.007 -
S
Sol-4-2-weeks agedd 9.95 3.78 266.79 24.00 1275.43 0..13 965.79 -
2A-S0-unaged 5.82 3.78 122.69 19.55 98.98 0..19 - -
S1-4-weeks aged 6.00 3.70 122.35 19.14 103.86 0..25 128.922 78.69
S2-4-weeks aged 6.23 3.76 133.28 19.19 90.23 0..23 110.86 78.68
Berea
S3-4-weeks aged 6.17 3.73 133.18 19.55 109.17 0..20 133.022 83.68
S4-4-weeks aged 6.17 3.73 122.63 18.73 90.96 0..21 118.43 70.72
S5-1-week aged 6.13 3.71 122.50 18.77 96.96 0..22 111.93 88.12
S8-1-week aged 6.03 3.75 122.10 18.17 75.31 0..21 78.100 65.37
F
Figure 2. The co
ores B2 and B4 placed
p in the he
eat cabinet at 11
10 °C for 2-week
ks aging period
d.
WWettability Stuudy
WWettability of aged and unag ged cores was measured usin ng combined A Amott-Harvey//USBM 4-stepp method. In sttep 1, aged
aand unaged corres at initial waater saturation were placed in
ndividually in Amott imbibittion cell filledd with syntheticc sea water
S
SPE 151515 5
(a) (b)
F
Figure 3. An exa
ample image of spontaneous water
w imbibition in aged (a) and
d unaged (b) corres.
I AH = I W − I O (1)
ΔSwspw
IW = (2)
ΔSwspw
s + ΔSw fw
ΔSwspd
IO = (3)
ΔSwsppd + ΔSw fd
wwhere I W and d I O are Amo ott water and oil indices, respectively.
r ΔSwspw is thhe change in water saturatiion due to
n, ΔSw fw is ch
sspontaneous waater imbibition hange in water saturation afteer forced water imbibition, ΔSwspd is changge in water
ssaturation due to a finally ΔSw fd is changee in water saturration after forcced oil drainagge.
t spontaneouss oil drainage and
T
The USBM weettability index
x ( I USBM ) requ
uires capillary pressure data from forced w
water imbibitionn and forced ooil drainage
ssteps and is calculated using the
t following formula:
f
A1
I USBM = Lo
og ( ) (4)
A2
NNMR experimeents were perfformed to stud dy wettability. For each coree plug, NMR scan was perfformed at connnate water
ssaturation and at residual oil saturation. All
A the NMR testst were runn on 12 MHz Maran DRX rock-core anaalyzer from
RResonance Insttruments, withh a gradient probe giving acccess to gradiennt strengths off up to 225 G//cm. The instruument was
6 SPE 155651
running at 35°C and ambient pressure. To avoid any evaporation, all the samples were preheated in dominating saturating
fluid at 35°C prior any test.
The similar effect was observed for Bentheimer sandstones (Figures 5 and 7). Unaged Bentheimer cores, B1 and B3, showed
Amott index of 0.98 and 0.94, respectively, which is the indication of strongly water wet condition. Aging the cores at
elevated temperature resulted in lowering of wettability indices for 1-week aged Cores B8 and B9 to 0.60 and 0.69,
respectively.
The wettability change for 2-weeks aged Bentheimer cores B2 and B4 was quite considerable and the wettability condition
for these cores changed to oil wet state. The USBM indices were also consistant with Amott indices and confirmed
wettability change as a result of aging for both sandstones (Figure 8). The USBM index was higher than the Amott-Harvey
index and such results indicate a mixed wet large type of wettability, Skauge et al, 2007.
As it is presented by Figure 7 for Bentheimer cores, as water wet condition in core plugs alterd towards more oil wet
condition (e.g. core B2), residual oil saturation decreased after forced water imbibition (Sor for well aged Bentheimer cores
B2 and B4 after forced water imbibition reach 0.08) while the trapped or irreducible water saturation during secondary
drainage process increased (for cores B2 and B3 the irreducible water saturation increased to 0.25). Therefore the secondary
drainage curve did not make a closed loop.The similar effect was reported by Masalmeh (2001). This effect may be attributed
to snap-off events exist in more oil wet systems where oil flows in films and snap-off event occurs in pore throats and
therefore results in trapping of water droplets in pore bulk area. In all aged Berea cores so called closed loop was observed at
neutral wettability condition (Figure 6).
The wetting properties were cross-checked by NMR, but no shift in T2 was observed. The results of NMR measurements did
not indicate any alteration in wettability as a function of aging.
S
SPE 151515 7
T
Table 4. Water saturation chaange and wettab
bility indices during
d wettabiliity experimentts.
B33-unaged 0
0.13 0.50 0.03 0.000 0.51 0.94 1.68
B4-2--weeks aged 0
0.12 0.01 0.79 0.224 0.37 -0.39 0.09
B8-1-week aged 0
0.12 0.35 0.24 0.000 0.62 0.60 1.47
B9-1-week aged 0
0.09 0.42 0.19 0.000 0.61 0.69 1.49
2A-SS0-unaged 0
0.97 0.39 0.03 0.000 0.38 0.91 1.05
S1-4--weeks aged 0
0.25 0.05 0.58 0.006 0.58 -0.02 0.26
S2-4--weeks aged 0
0.23 0.06 0.50 0.002 0.54 0.06 0.78
B e re a
S3-4--weeks aged 0
0.20 0.06 0.52 0.005 0.52 0.01 0.12
S4-4--weeks aged 0
0.21 0.11 0.46 0.004 0.53 0.13 0.21
S5-1-week aged 0
0.22 0.10 - - - - -
S8-1-week aged 0
0.21 0.14 - - - - -
F
Figure 4. Oil recovery by spontaneous water im
mbibition in age
ed and unaged B
Berea cores.
8 S
SPE 155651
F
Figure 5. Oil recovery by spontaneous water im
mbibition in age
ed and unaged B
Bentheimer corres.
F
Figure 6. Capilla
ary pressure currves for aged an
nd unaged Bere
ea cores.
S
SPE 151515 9
F
Figure 7. Capilla
ary pressure currves for aged an
nd unaged Benttheimer cores.
T
Table 5. Summ
mary of flow experiments.
F
Figure 9. Oil pro
oduction profile during synthetic sea and low salinity
s brine in
njection in comp
psite cores of different wettabillity states.
S
SPE 151515 11
F
Figure 10. Oil recovery, differen
ntial pressure and injection rate
e variation duri ng synthetic se
ea and low salin
nity water injection into
u
unaged compos site Bentheimer core B14-B15.
TThe second floow experiment was performed with compossite Bentheimeer core B8-B9 (Figure 11). T The average Amott index
w 0.65 which showed somee shift from strrongly water w
ffor this core was wet condition. The tail produuction after rouughly early
bbreakthrough (ccompared to un
naged B14-B15) was observeed and the recoovery factor reeached to 51.7%% of OOIP afteer about 22
innjected pore volumes.
v The recovery facto or did not chaange during loow salinity injeection which llasted for abouut 16 pore
vvolumes. The presuure
p drop across
a the core was constant and
a roughly low wer than presssure drop in SS
SW injection peeriod.
F
Figure 11. Oil recovery, differen
ntial pressure and injection rate
e variation duri ng synthetic se
ea and low salin
nity water injection into
1
1-week aged com mposite Benthe eimer core B8-BB9.
12 S
SPE 155651
F
Figure 12. Oil recovery, differen
ntial pressure and injection rate
e variation duri ng synthetic se
ea and low salin
nity water injection into 2-
w
weeks aged com mposite Bentheiimer core B2-B4 4.
F
Figure 13. Oil recovery, differen
ntial pressure and injection rate
e variation duri ng synthetic se
ea and low salin
nity water injection into 2-
w
weeks aged Ben ntheimer core Sol-4.
C
Conclusions
L
Low salinity waterflooding ex
xperiments sho
owed no increaased oil recoverry in strongly w
water wet Benttheimer cores.
TThe Berea corees have much higher clay co ontent compared to Bentheim mer, but Bereaa is less oil wet than Bentheeimer. It is
hat the clay content in Berea cores favors ooil recovery byy low salinity, hhowever the m
eexpected from the literature th more oil wet
ccharacter of thee Bentheimer seems more imp portant for imp
proved oil recoovery by low saalinity waterfloood.
14 SPE 155651
Nomenclature
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from the Norwegian Research Council. Master student, Solveig
Riisøen, is also acknowledged for her contribution in this work.
References
Amott, E., (1959), “Observations Relating to the Wettability of Porous Rock,” SPE 1167-G. Trans. AIME. 216: p. 156 - 162.
Alagic, E., and Skauge, A., (2010), “Combined Low Salinity Brine Injection and Surfactant Flooding in Mixed-Wet
Sandstone Cores”, Energy & Fuels 24 (6): 3551–3559.
Alotaibi, M.B., and Nasr-El-Din, H.A., (2009), “Chemistry of Injection Water and its Impact on Oil Recovery in Carbonate
and Clastic Formations”, Paper SPE 121565, the Woodlands, Texas, USA, April 20–22, 2009.
Ashraf, A., Hadia, N.J., Torsæter, O., and Tweheyo, M.T., (2010), “Laboratory investigation of low salinity waterflooding as
secondary recovery process: effect of wettability,” Paper SPE 129012, Mumbai, India, Jan. 20–22, 2010.
SPE 151515 15
Bernard, G.G., (1967), “Effect of Floodwater Salinity on Recovery of Oil from Cores Containing Clays,” Paper SPE 1725,
Los Angeles, California, Oct. 26-27, 1967.
Donaldson, E.C., Thomas, R.D., and Lorenz, P.B., (1969), “Wettability Determination and Its Effect on Recovery
Efficiency,” SPE 2338-PA. SPE Journal. 9(1): p. 13 - 20.
Jadhunandan, P., and Morrow, N.R., (1991), “Spontaneous Imbibition of Water by Crude Oil/Brine/Rock Systems,” In Situ,
vol 15, pp 4319-4345.
Jadhunandan, P., and Morrow, N.R., (1995), “Effect of Wettability on Waterflood recovery for Crude Oil/Brine/Rock
Systems,” SPE Reservoir Engineering (February), pp 40
Jerauld, G.R., Lin, C.Y., Webb, K.J., Secombe, J.C., (2006), “Modeling Low-Salinity Waterflooding,” paper SPE 102239
presented at the 2006 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 24-27 September 2006.
Lager, A., Webb, K.J., Black, C.J.J., Singleton, M., and Sorbie, K.S., (2006), “ Low Salinity Oil Recovery – An
Experimental Investigation,” paper presented at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Trondheim,
Norway, 12-16 September 2006.
Martin, J. C., (1957), “The Effects of Clay on the Displacement of Heavy Oil by Water,” SPE 1411-G, Caracas, Venezuela,
Oct. 14-16, 1957.
Masalmeh, S., (2001),“Experimental Measurements of Capillary Pressure and Relative Permeability Hysteresis,”SCA 2001-
23 presented during the 2001 International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Edinburgh, Scotland (Sept. 17-19).
McGuire, P.L., Chatham, J.R., Paskvan, F.K., Sommer, D.M., and Carini, F.H., (2005), “Low Salinity Oil Recovery: An
Exciting New EOR Opportunity for Alaska’s North Slope,” paper SPE 93903 presented at the 2005 SPE Western Regional
Meeting, Irvine, Ca, 30 March-1 April 2005.
Morrow, N.R., and Buckley, J., (2011), “Improved Oil Recovery by Low-Salinity Waterflooding,” Distinguished Author
Series, JPT, May 2011, 106-110.
Morrow, N.R., Tang, G.Q., Valat, M., Xie, X., (1998), “Prospects of Improved Oil Recovery related to Wettability and Brine
Composition,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., vol 20, pp 267-276.
Sharma, M.M., and Filico, P.R., (1998), “Effect of Brine Salinity and Crude-Oil Properties on Oil Recovery and Residual
Saturations,” paper SPE 65402 presented at the 1998 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, 27-30
September 1998.
Skauge, A., Spildo, K., Høiland, L., and Vik B., “Theoretical and experimental evidence of different wettability classes,”
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 57 (2007) 321–333
Tang, G.Q., and Morrow, N.R., (1997), “Salinity, Temperature, Oil Composition and Oil Recovery by Waterflooding,” SPE
Reservoir Eng., November, pp 269-276.
Tang, G.Q., and Morrow, N.R, (1999), “Influence of brine composition and fines migration on crude oil/brine/rock
interactions and oil recovery,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., vol 24, pp 99-111
Webb, K.J., Black, C.J.J., and Al-Ajeel, H., (2004), “Low Salinity Oil Recovery – Log-Inject- Log,” paper SPE 89379
presented at the 2004 SPE/DOE Fourteenth Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, OK, 17-21 April 2004.
Webb, K.J., Black, C.J.J., and Edmonds, I.J., (2005a), "Low Salinity Oil Recovery - The Role of Reservoir Condition
Corefloods," paper presented at the 13th European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Budapest, Hungary, 25-27 April
2005.
Webb, K.J., Black, C.J.J., and Tjetland, G., (2005b), “A Laboratory Study Investigating Methods for Improving Oil Recovery
in Carbonates,” paper IPTC 10506 presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha, Qatar, 21-23
November 2005.
Yildiz, H.O., and Morrow, N.R., (1996), “Effect of Brine Composition on Recovery of Moutray Crude Oil by
Waterflooding,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., vol 14, pp 159-168
Zhang, Y., and Morrow, N.R., (2006), "Comparison of Secondary and Tertiary Recovery with Change in Brine Composition
for Crude Oil/Sandstone Combinations," paper SPE 99757 presented at the 2006 SPE/DOE Symposium on Increased Oil
Recovery, Tulsa, OK, 22-26 April 2006.