Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1. PURPOSE
Wireless communication system, typical structure shown in Fig.1-1, consists of
two major parts: Terminal1 (T1)and Terminal2 (T2) in a link.
Propagation
loss
Antenna Noise
gain
Antenna
Transmitter gain
Receiver
Transmit Feeder Feeder Received
power loss loss power
1
2. LINK BUDGET PARAMETERS
In order to perform the final link budget calculation, this section presents all
parameters, seen from the user point of view or looked by the designer that should
be taken into account.
2
Unit LINK
FEA Tx Power (dBm) 43.01 (20W)
These values might be changed when performing the link budget calculation.
3
In some literature, Directivity (D) of an antenna can be written in terms of the
beam solid angle, which is expressed in steradians, or square radians, it is given by:
4𝜋
𝐷= (Equation 2-2)
Ω𝐴
Where:
2𝜋 𝜋
Ω𝐴 = ∫0 ∫0 |𝐹(𝜃, 𝜙)|2 sin 𝜃 𝑑𝜃𝑑𝜙 (Equation 2-3)
Where 𝜃 and 𝜙 are represented in Fig. 2-1.
The power pattern |𝐹(𝜃, 𝜙)|2, must be normalized to unity to achieve the
correct result.
Z
Y
Ф
X
Siso W/m2
Gt=Giso=1
Save W/m2
Gt>>Giso
4
(b)Directive Antenna.
Fig.2-2 Isotropic and Directive Antenna Gain.
NB:
5
Since horizontal polarization is more vulnerable to earth interference, vertical
polarization presents a better choice.
6
encoder, BERtool of MATLAB software is used. Results are illustrated in
Fig. 2-3.
7
Fig. 2-3 shows the BER plots as a function of energy per bit to noise power
ratio Eb/N0 (introduced in section 2.10). The three plots are BERs for the uncoded
BPSK and coded system using convolutional encoder and block encoder versus E b/N0.
It can be seen that the convolutional encoder gives better performance; according to
this practical communication system, the improvement is set to be 5 dB for BER≤ 10
-5.
2.7 BANDWIDTH
The bandwidth is the resource required to transfer a certain amount of
information in a given time segment. In image and TV transmission, compression
techniques have to be applied to the signal from the camera to reduce the bandwidth
consumption.
Bandwidths efficiency (Beff) for various digital modulation methods used are
given in Table 2-4.
Table 2-4Bandwidths Efficiency for Various Digital Modulation Methods.
Modulation Bandwidth Efficiency
Method (null-to-null)
QPSK 1.0X Bit Rate
BPSK 2.0x Bit Rate
BFSK 2.5x Bit Rate
NB.
8
RF bandwidth is not only determined by data rate and bandwidth efficiency of
modulation techniques, but it is necessary to consider constraints about filters design
at the receiver side.
Fig. 2-4 represents the data rate transformation through all communication
blocks as for the transmitting side. At the receiver side, the transformation will
beperformed in the reverse way.
Channel M-ary
Source Base Band
Coding
SpSp
Modulator
UpConverter PA
9
Fig.2-5Data Rate for The Link.
per bit to noise power ratio in decibels, and R is the data rate in bits per second.
Anyone who has studied analog communications is familiar with figure of merit,
average signal power to average noise power ratio (S/N or SNR). In digital
𝐸𝑏
communication, we more often use , a normalized version of SNR, as a figure of
𝑁0
𝐸𝑏
merit. The relation between SNR and is given by:
𝑁0
𝐸𝑏 𝑆 𝑊
= ( ) (Equation 2-9)
𝑁0 𝑁 𝑅
10
Where S is the signal power, 𝐸𝑏 is bit energy, 𝑁0 is noise power spectral
density, and can be described as noise power Ndivided by bandwidth W and R is the
bit rate.
The 𝑆𝑁𝑅 or𝐸𝑏 ⁄𝑁0 required represents the minimum quantity that must be
available at the receiver in order to achieve a certain level of performance, this
quantity is given from practical experiments and is different from theoretical values.
Performance of any wireless communication system is measured by its error
performance represented by Bit Error Rate (BER).
The minimum required SNR versus the data rate for all links, is presented in
Table 2-5.
Table 2-5 Required SNR versus Data Rate.
Link
Modulation BPSK
Channel Coding Viterbi 1/2
Data Rate After Coding 25.6kbps
Min Required SNR 13
11
LINK
NF (dB) 6
NB.
The NFBFSK>NFPSK because the FSK equipment (Tx, PA, filter…) are more noisy.
12
𝑃𝑀𝐿 = −10 ∙ 𝑙𝑜𝑔10 (𝑝) (Equation 2-13)
NB.
Pointing and polarization loss are given by the antenna constructor, their values
can be found in Table 4-3.
13
the receiver. The objective of this chapter is to present a detailed calculation method
of the link budget.
Prad
Transmitter Z0 (Ltc) Zant Zant Z0 (Lrc) Receiver
R
Prefl Prerad
14
will be reflected, 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑙 , the difference between 𝑃𝑡 and 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑙 is the power delivered to
the antenna, 𝑃𝑎𝑛𝑡 .
𝑃𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 𝑃𝑡 (1 − |Γ𝑡 |2 ) (Equation 3-3)
Where:
|Γ𝑡 |2: represent the power reflection coefficient at the transmit side.
The individual factor on the transmit end is given by:
𝑞𝑡 = 1 − |Γ𝑡 |2 (Equation 3-4)
An antenna will not radiate all power delivered to it, that is, 𝑃𝑟𝑎𝑑 will be less
than 𝑃𝑎𝑛𝑡 , because of dissipative losses resulting from the presence of non-ideal
conductors and dielectrics, these can be included in equipment loss. Radiation
efficiency accounts for this loss and is given by:
𝑃𝑟𝑎𝑑
𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑 = , 0 ≤ 𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑 ≤ 1 (Equation 3-5)
𝑃𝑎𝑛𝑡
Consider a transmit antenna that radiates equally in all directions (directional)
and operates in free space. It is convenient to assume that the radiation efficiency is
one (1), so that 𝑃𝑟𝑎𝑑 = 𝑃𝑎𝑛𝑡 .
The radial power density, or average pointing vector, 𝑆 𝑖𝑠𝑜 , in the outward
̅̅̅̅̅
15
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑆𝑎𝑣𝑒 (𝑅) ∙ 𝐴𝑒𝑟 𝑟̂ (Equation 3-10)
Receive
antenna
Plane Ap
^
r Aer
Wave
Transmit z E
Antenna Save
H
location
θt
y
φt
x
16
Where:
|Γ𝑟 |2: represents the power reflection coefficient at the receive side.
The individual factor on the receive end is given by:
𝑞𝑟 = 1 − |Γ𝑟 |2 (Equation 3-18)
Dissipation in the receive cable is accounted for by its loss factor, 𝐿𝑟𝑐 , given as:
𝑃𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒
𝐿𝑟𝑐 = (Equation 3-19)
𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑐
The attenuation, 𝐴𝑟𝑐 in dB, in terms of the receive cable loss factor given by:
𝐴𝑟𝑐 = 10𝑙𝑜𝑔10 (𝐿𝑟𝑐 ) (Equation 3-20)
Hence, the power at the terminals of the receiver is determined as:
𝑃𝑠 ∙𝑞𝑡 𝐺𝑡 ∙𝐺𝑟 𝑞𝑟
𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑐 (𝑅) = (Equation 3-21)
𝐿𝑡𝑐 𝐿𝑓𝑠 𝐿𝑟𝑐
To quantify the reduction in the received power due to mismatch impedance
mismatch on both ends of the system, the total loss factor, 𝑞𝑡𝑜𝑡 , is defined:
𝑞𝑡𝑜𝑡 = 𝑞𝑡 ∙ 𝑞𝑟 (Equation 3-22)
The mismatch loss is often stated in decibels, it is defined as:
𝑀𝑀𝐿𝑡𝑜𝑡 = −10 ∙ 𝑙𝑜𝑔10 (𝑞𝑡𝑜𝑡 ) (Equation 3-23)
Substituting Equation 5-22 in Equation 5-21, we get:
𝑃𝑠 ∙𝐺𝑡 ∙𝐺𝑟 1
𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑐 (𝑅) = ∙ ∙ 𝑞𝑡𝑜𝑡 (Equation 3-24)
𝐿𝑡𝑐 ∙𝐿𝑟𝑐 𝐿𝑠𝑓
17
As mentioned before, only the rain absorption is considered, in link budget
calculation, the term 𝐿𝑎𝑡𝑚 can normally be assumed to be unity, however, at highest
frequencies this term must be considered.
Rewriting Equation 5-25 in more compact form:
𝑃𝑠 ∙𝐺𝑡 ∙𝐺𝑟 1
𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑐 (𝑅) = ∙ ∙ 𝑝 ∙ 𝑝𝑙 𝑞𝑡𝑜𝑡 (Equation 3-28)
𝐿𝑡𝑐 ∙𝐿𝑟𝑐 𝐿𝑝𝑎𝑡ℎ
Converting Equation 5-28 from linear form to decibels, we get:
𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑐 (𝑑𝐵𝑚) = 𝑃𝑠 (𝑑𝐵𝑚) + 𝐺𝑡 (𝑑𝐵𝑖) + 𝐺𝑟 (𝑑𝐵𝑖) − 𝐴𝑡𝑐 (𝑑𝐵) − 𝐴𝑟𝑐 (𝑑𝐵) − 𝐴𝑝𝑎𝑡ℎ − 𝑃𝑀𝐿(𝑑𝐵) −
𝑃𝐿(𝑑𝐵) − 𝑀𝑀𝐿𝑡𝑜𝑡 (𝑑𝐵) (Equation 3-29)
Other losses have to be included in Equation 5-29 such as, transmit hardware
loss, 𝐿𝑡ℎ , receive hardware loss,𝐿𝑟ℎ , and SpSp implementation loss,𝐿𝑆𝑝𝑆𝑝 , due to
direct sequence spread spectrum technique (DSSS). The gain of DSSS,𝐺𝑠𝑝𝑠𝑝 , has to
be included as well.
Hence, the effective carrier power (C) is given by:
𝐶(𝑑𝐵𝑚) = 𝑃𝑠 (𝑑𝐵𝑚) + 𝐺𝑡 (𝑑𝐵𝑖) + 𝐺𝑟 (𝑑𝐵𝑖) + 𝐺𝑆𝑝𝑆𝑝 (𝑑𝐵) − 𝐴𝑆𝑝𝑆𝑝 − 𝐴𝑡𝑐 (𝑑𝐵) − 𝐴𝑡ℎ (𝑑𝐵) −
𝐴𝑟𝑐 (𝑑𝐵) − 𝐴𝑟ℎ (𝑑𝐵) − 𝐴𝑝𝑎𝑡ℎ − 𝑃𝑀𝐿(𝑑𝐵) − 𝑃𝐿(𝑑𝐵) − 𝑀𝑀𝐿𝑡𝑜𝑡 (𝑑𝐵) (Equation 3-30)
Where:
𝐴𝑡ℎ = 10 ∙ 𝑙𝑜𝑔10 (𝐿𝑡ℎ );
𝐴𝑟ℎ = 10 ∙ 𝑙𝑜𝑔10 (𝐿𝑟ℎ );
𝐴𝑆𝑝𝑆𝑝 = 10 ∙ 𝑙𝑜𝑔10 (𝐿𝑆𝑝𝑆𝑝 ).
18
3.1.5 CARRIER TO NOISE CALCULATION
To quantify the system performance, the carrier to noise, 𝐶 ⁄𝑃𝑛 , should be
computed. This ensures that there is an adequate signal to achieve a specified level
of data quality. This is known as the received 𝑆𝑁𝑅𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 , which represents the
available 𝑆𝑁𝑅 in the system. This value is computed using the followingequation:
[𝑆𝑁𝑅𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 ]𝑑𝑏 = [𝐶]𝑑𝐵𝑚 − [𝑃𝑛 ]𝑑𝐵𝑚 (Equation 3-35)
4. CALCULATION RESULTS
This section presents all calculations results after using the approach explained
in link budget overview and components (section 5).
19
4.2 RECEIVER NOISE BANDWIDTH
The Receiver Noise Bandwidth calculation (Equation 5-32) results are presented
in Table 4-2.
Table 4-2 Receive Noise Bandwidth (dB).
BW (MHz) RNB (dB)
Link 0.0512 -12.9
20
Table 4-3Link Budget Calculation.
21
From the calculation above, the FM calculation is summarized in Table 4-4.
Table 4-4 Fade Margin Values.
LINK
Frequency ‘F’ (MHz) 9560
Free space loss ‘Lfs’(dB) 112.28
Fade Margin ‘FM’ (dB) 32.93
NB:
The effective noise power is calculated for different values. If we just consider
the data rate before spreading, Equation 6-1 or Equation 6-2, has to be used
otherwise; bandwidth after spreading should be considered without considering the
SpSp implementation neither the SpSp gain.
22
5. RESULTS ANALYSIS
The link budget for the case under study has shown the following observations:
a) It is observed that the received power can be increased when:
1) The power at the transmitter is increased, this might be possible in T1.
2) Minimizing the cable and hardware losses using the appropriate
technology;
3) Transmit and/or receive antenna gain is greater. Since the gain is
closely related to the antenna type, these parameters are limited by
the antenna mass, size and position.
b) The receiver power must be larger enough to provide a good quality signal
but should be limited such that it does not overload the receiver;
c) As for frequency allocation:
1) In term of dimension specification, as the frequency increases, the size
and weight of the equipment decreases,however, it leads to more
complex technology;
2) Increasing the frequency to reduce the equipment size is not always a
good alternative. Total propagation loss increases as the frequency
increases, when maintaining the same distance;
3) If the effective carrier power and the distance are kept constant,
increasing the frequency will lead to increase the transmit power;
4) Frequency band has to be chosen, based on the antenna size and
transmitter power, which allow to satisfy the link budget under
jamming conditions. Frequency range choices is limited by the
concerned authority.
d) Losses such as atmospheric loss and multipath loss have not been taken
into account when performing the final link budget calculation. The FM
includes all these losses;
e) All calculated FM meets the requirement of being in the range of [12-18 dB]
to ensure the optimal availabilityoverthecommunication range.
23
6. GENERAL CONCLUSION
The link budget calculation is a process of repeated calculations and
adjustments of the main communication equipment in order to complete data link
system design in respect of given requirements such as the operation frequency and
the range.In this study case, requirements have been considered for the link.
By examining the link budget, one can learn many things about overall system
design and performance. From the link margin, one can learns whether the system
will meet many of its requirements comfortably.
The link budget may reveal if there are any hardware constraints, and whether
such a constraints can be compensated in other parts of the link.
The link budget is often used as a “score sheet” in considering system trade-
offs and configuration changes, and in understanding subsystem nuances and inter-
dependencies. From a quick examination of the link budget and its supporting
documentation, one can judge whether the analysis was done precisely or if it
represents a rough estimation.
The link budget can predict equipment weight, size, prime power requirement,
technical risk and cost. The choice of the different equipment such as the
transmitter, the antenna, the receiver and the power amplifiers along with all the
required parameters is made much easier. It can be considered as the basis of the
manufacturing of this equipment.
The detail link budget analysis and calculation is one of the system manager’s
most useful documents; as it represents the “bottom-line” tally in the research for
optimum system performance.
24