Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Change In A/S:
JAN FEB NAS APS NAY JUN
YEAS 1 YEAS 1 YEAR 1 YEAR 1 YEAR 1 YEAR 1
Beginning A/S SO
so so so S55,290 $192,060
Add sales (debits) 0 174,600 174,600 < — Assuies net of bad debts.
0 0 58,200
Subtotal 0 0 0 58,200 229,890 366,660
Collections: Collections based on the following percentages:
This aonth'e sales 0 0 0 2,910 8,730 8,730 < - 5«
1 lonth ago 0 0 0 29,100 87,300 <-- 50>;
2 lonths ago 0 0 0 17,460 < - 30X
0 0 0 5
3 lonths ago
0 0 0 2,910 37,830 113,490 Representative collection figures assuied for
Total collections years 4 and 5.
0 0 0 55,290 192,060 253,170
Ending A/S
$0 $0 $0 $55,290 $136,770 $61,110
Change in A/S ======== ======== ======== ======== ======= =======
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Number of units 0 100 100 100 300 300 300 200 100 200 200 200
manufactured
Cumulative units 0 100 200 300 600 900 1,200 1,400 1,500 1,700 1,900 2,100
manufactured
Less cumulative 0 0 0 100 400 700 1,000 1,200 1,250 1,350 1,500 1,700
units sold
Finished-goods 0 100 200 200 200 200 200 200 250 350 400 400
Inventory
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Raw material $198 $100 $154 $150 $140 $132 $120 $110 $132 $120 $110 $330
Work in process 25 25 25 75 75 75 50 25 50 50 50 125
Finished goods 0 32 63 95 158 158 158 126 95 142 173 189
Estimated $223 $157 $242 $320 $373 $365 $328 $261 $277 $312 $333 $644
Actual $208 $219 $283 $378 $310 $375 $300 $248 $383 $370 $341 $652
It's true that if you start out • from the income statement. Next Even tbe sequence can be different. Use
using a receivables-based credit line, comes minus a positive change in ac- wbatever sequence fits your business.
you will need less venture capital to crued taxes, plus a positive change in If you're planning to buy
start the business. But tbis type of inventory and prepaid expenses, and equipment and bave tbe manufacturer
financing may make it impossible to - ^ accounts payable. Subtract tbis sec- or otber tbird party finance a portion of
obtain extra financing later because ond item, total operating casb out- the price, you would, looking at Ex-
tbe company will bave no collateral flows, from tbe first, net operating cash hibit IX, record the transaction as fol-
left to offer. It's best instead to leave inflows, and the result is net operating lows: you would show the total price of
receivables-based financing as a con- cash flow. NOCF pinpoints how much tbe equipment in the "start" column
tingency financing source in case it's cash was generated from the basie op- for capital expenditures, the amount of
really needed. erations of tbe company. Tbis is casb the note in the start column as a debt
Even worse would be factor- witb wbicb to grow the company. instrument in the finaneial flows sec-
ing, wbicb is tbe sale of tbe receivable. The first use of NOCF is to tion, and periodic payments in their re-
I first formed this opinion in the course pay the priority outflows, which con- spective time period columns as prior-
of assisting witb the start-up of an opb- sist of interest expense and debt repay- ity outflow-interest expense and debt
tbalmic laboratory. Tbe entrepreneur's ment. Here you would also include a repayment.
lawyer did his best to convince us tbat large lease payment-say for the prem- In the initial financial cash
we should sell the receivables to the ises the eompany occupies-in lieu of a flow forecast for the new venture, I
company for which he was counsel. We mortgage payment. (Small lease pay- suggest that no entry be made in the fi-
resisted, and well we did, for when the ments go under cost of goods sold, nancial flows section except the bring-
venture got into trouble, it was able to G&A expense, or selling expense.) along financing I referred to previously.
use tbe receivables as anotber source of The next section, discretion- The punch line of the cash
capital. ary outflows, includes a ranking of four flow statement is part seven, net
Tbe second part of the cash discretionary expenditures. For exam- change in cash and marketable securi-
flow statement, total operating cash ple, in certain businesses-toys, for ex- ties. This is defined as part three
outflows, includes cost of goods sold ample-advertising expenses migbt be (NOCF) minus part four (total priority
(excluding depreciation), G&A ex- as mucb as or more tban R&D or eapi-
penses, selling expenses, and taxes tal expenditures in other businesses. [Continued on page 136)
136 Harvard Business Review May-June 1986
cash depreciation
outflows
+ General and administrative
expenses
(/t
JAN FEB HAR APR HAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT
YEAR 1 YEAR 1 YEAR 1 YEAR 1 YEAR 1 YEAR 1 YEAR 1 YEAR 1 YEAR 1 YEAR 1
OPERATIKC CASH IKFLOtfS:
4 Net salee SO SO SO 000 SISO,000 S180 ,000 S180 ,000 $120,000 S30, 000 S60, 000
- Change in A/R 0 0 0 ^ ; 290 136,770 61 ,110 17 ,460 (55,290) (109, 125) (20,370)
(1) NET OPERATING CASH 0 .0 0 4,710 43, 230 118,890 162,540 175,290 139, 125 80, 370
PRIORITY OUTFLOWS:
+ Interest expenses 2,333 2,286 2,237 2,187 2,137 2,086 2,034 1,961 1,928 1,873
'•' Current debt repayable 2,870 2,917 2,966 3,015 3,066 3,117 3,169 3,222 3,275 3,330
(4) TOTAL PRIORTY OUTFLOWS 5,203 5,203 5,203 5,202 5,203 5,203 5,203 5,203 5,203 5,203
DISCRETIONARY OUTFLOWS:
* Capital expenditures 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(5) TOTAL DISCRETIONARY OUTFLOWS 200,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FINANCIAL
-I- Debt instrunents (borrowings) 140,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(6) TOTAL FINANCIAL FLOWS 140,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Projected ending cash balance (S273,633) (S331,466) (5385,459) (S624,141) (5650,304) (S603,987) (S634,310) (6510,453) (5432,131) (S541,324)
While these forecasts are not If you take the larger differ- plus a contingency amount of
shown here, we (iid them for the Mc- ence between the maximum negative $200,000, or a total of $ 1,050,000.
DonaW Company and noted the largest cash balance for the most likely scenar- What if the entrepreneurs
decrease in the cash balance for each io and either the most optimistic or the perceive that their track record will
scenario. For the most optimistic sce- most pessimistic situation, you get an not support a request for the amount
nario, the maximum negative cash bal- estimate of our contingency factor. In needed to finance the venture? They
ance was $1,052,289 (occurring in April this case, the most pessimistic is only can go back to the income statement
of year 2). For the most pessimistic sce- $ 13,693 more than the most likely sce- and balance sheet and make adjust-
nario, the comparable number for the nario number, but the difference for the ments that might save money. Perhaps
first two years was $859,756 (occurring most optimistic projection is $194,846. scaling back the sales forecast even
in April of year 2). It's not really sur- Surely, if you listed the capi- more than the most pessimistic esti-
prising that the most optimistic scenar- ,tal required as $846,063 plus a contin- mate might help. A company could
io required more cash than the most gency reserve of $ 194,846, your figures save on working capital or buy used
pessimistic, as generating more sales would have specious accuracy, which machinery instead of new or could sub-
meant heightening working capital re- would not speak well for the forecaster. contract production until the business
quirements, especially accounts receiv- So round off the numbers and state that was healthy. Whatever the alternatives,
able and inventory. the business needs capital of $850,000 , you can use the same model.
Harvard Business Review May-June 1986 139
Harvard Business Review and Harvard Business Publishing Newsletter content on EBSCOhost is licensed for
the private individual use of authorized EBSCOhost users. It is not intended for use as assigned course material
in academic institutions nor as corporate learning or training materials in businesses. Academic licensees may
not use this content in electronic reserves, electronic course packs, persistent linking from syllabi or by any
other means of incorporating the content into course resources. Business licensees may not host this content on
learning management systems or use persistent linking or other means to incorporate the content into learning
management systems. Harvard Business Publishing will be pleased to grant permission to make this content
available through such means. For rates and permission, contact permissions@harvardbusiness.org.