Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Assessment 1
1
Table of Contents
Lesson Plan 1.……………………………………………………………..3
Lesson Plan 2……………………………………………………………...12
Lesson Plan 3.……………………………………………………………..21
Academic Justification …………………………………………………... 29
2
Lesson Plan
Cross Curriculum themes & General capabilities Explicit subject specific concepts and skills
Moving
Decision Making
3
Intellectual Quality 1.1 Deep knowledge 1.4 Higher-order thinking
This refers to pedagogy focused on producing deep understanding of important, 1.2 Deep understanding 1.5 Metalanguage
substantive concepts, skills and ideas. Such pedagogy treats knowledge as something 1.3 Problematic 1.6 Substantive
that requires active construction and requires students to engage in higher-order knowledge communication
thinking and to communicate substantively about what they are learning.
Quality Learning Environment 2.1 Explicit quality criteria 2.4 Social Support
This refers to pedagogy that creates classrooms where students and teachers work 2.2 Engagement 2.5 Students’ self regulation
productively in an environment clearly focused on learning. Such pedagogy sets high and 2.3 High Expectations 2.6 Student direction
explicit expectations and develops positive relationships between teacher and students
and among students.
Significance 3.1 Background 3.4 Inclusivity
This refers to pedagogy that helps make learning more meaningful and important to knowledge 3.5 Connectedness
students. Such pedagogy draws clear connections with students’ prior knowledge and 3.2 Cultural knowledge 3.6 Narrative
identities, with contexts outside of the classroom, and with multiple ways of knowing all 3.3 Knowledge
cultural perspective. integration
How the quality teaching elements you have identified are achieved within the lesson.
4
Time Teaching and learning actions Organisation Centred
T/S
5 Introduce the topic Movement skill and
Performance.
Student:
Begin the activity by asking students to pick a
partner. Resources:
Once students have picked a partner, they then line
up on either end of the netball court opposite each
other.
5
Modifications
Debrief Questions
15 Survivor
6
they then move to the last zone, which is
inside the opposing 3pt zone.
Modifications
Debrief Questions
Teacher:
10 Pass-Catch-Pass
Student:
Modifications
7
Debrief Questions
Modifications
8
Debrief Questions
9
Reflection
What have I learned about the teaching and learning process when preparing this
lesson?
Upon reflection, it was important to observe how the students are participating the
game to make any modifications if needed. It was also important to ask any debrief
questions to initiate to student tactical awareness. It was also important to consider
students safety, as it was a practical lesson on the basketball courts.
Other considerations
Complete the table blow by inserting the AISTL graduate standards that you are
demonstrating and indicates the evidence from this lesson that should comply with
the standard.
The lesson plans are sequenced and scaffolded so that students are
2.2 Content selection always progressing through different skills needed to play
and organisation basketball.
10
WHS
What are the key risk issues that may appear for and need to be reduced/eliminated
in this lesson? Using your syllabus and support documents as well as other WHS
policy- Outline the key WHS considerations that are to be applied in this lesson?
Make sure students are playing by the rules and there are minimal behaviour
problems. Make sure all equipment is safe to use. Ensure that there is a safe playing
environment.
11
Lesson Plan
Cross Curriculum themes & General capabilities Explicit subject specific concepts and skills
12
Intellectual Quality 1.1 Deep knowledge 1.4 Higher-order thinking
This refers to pedagogy focused on producing deep understanding of important, 1.2 Deep understanding 1.5 Metalanguage
substantive concepts, skills and ideas. Such pedagogy treats knowledge as something 1.3 Problematic 1.6 Substantive
that requires active construction and requires students to engage in higher-order knowledge communication
thinking and to communicate substantively about what they are learning.
Quality Learning Environment 2.1 Explicit quality criteria 2.4 Social Support
This refers to pedagogy that creates classrooms where students and teachers work 2.2 Engagement 2.5 Students’ self regulation
productively in an environment clearly focused on learning. Such pedagogy sets high and 2.3 High Expectations 2.6 Student direction
explicit expectations and develops positive relationships between teacher and students
and among students.
Significance 3.1 Background 3.4 Inclusivity
This refers to pedagogy that helps make learning more meaningful and important to knowledge 3.5 Connectedness
students. Such pedagogy draws clear connections with students’ prior knowledge and 3.2 Cultural knowledge 3.6 Narrative
identities, with contexts outside of the classroom, and with multiple ways of knowing all 3.3 Knowledge
cultural perspective. integration
How the quality teaching elements you have identified are achieved within the
lesson.
13
Time Teaching and learning actions Organisation Centred
T/S
15 Possession Target Game Teacher:
The team with the most points will win the game.
Modifications
14
Use a different ball
Debrief Questions
Student:
Resources:
Once the first activity is complete ask students to
line up in their teams starting positions on either
the base line or half way line.
15
If the ball goes out of bounds, the team
who did not strike the ball out of bounds
will maintain possession but the pass count
will restart.
Modifications
Debrief Questions
Teacher:
Endzone Student:
Resurces:
15 Ask students to line up in their teams starting
positions on either the halfway line of the
basketball court or on the baseline.
16
Teams need to make a minimum of 5
consecutive passes before they catch the
ball of the end zone line for a point.
Student:
Number game
Resources:
Ask students to stand on the baseline of the
basketball court and prepare for the next game.
17
to not be the last group to sit down, or be left out
as an odd number.
18
Reflection
What have I learned about the teaching and learning process when preparing this
lesson?
Upon reflection, it was important to observe how the students are participating the
game to make any modifications if needed. It was also important to ask any debrief
questions to initiate to student tactical awareness. It was also important to consider
students safety, as it was a practical lesson on the basketball courts. Sequential
learning was also important to progress student’s skill level.
Other considerations
Complete the table blow by inserting the AISTL graduate standards that you are
demonstrating and indicates the evidence from this lesson that should comply with
the standard.
WHS
What are the key risk issues that may appear for and need to be reduced/eliminated
in this lesson? Using your syllabus and support documents as well as other WHS
policy- Outline the key WHS considerations that are to be applied in this lesson?
Make sure students are playing by the rules and there are minimal behaviour
problems. Make sure all equipment is safe to use. Ensure that there is a safe playing
environment.
19
20
Lesson Plan
Cross Curriculum themes & General capabilities Explicit subject specific concepts and skills
Decision Making
21
Intellectual Quality 1.1 Deep knowledge 1.4 Higher-order thinking
This refers to pedagogy focused on producing deep understanding of important, 1.2 Deep understanding 1.5 Metalanguage
substantive concepts, skills and ideas. Such pedagogy treats knowledge as something 1.3 Problematic 1.6 Substantive
that requires active construction and requires students to engage in higher-order knowledge communication
thinking and to communicate substantively about what they are learning.
Quality Learning Environment 2.1 Explicit quality criteria 2.4 Social Support
This refers to pedagogy that creates classrooms where students and teachers work 2.2 Engagement 2.5 Students’ self regulation
productively in an environment clearly focused on learning. Such pedagogy sets high and 2.3 High Expectations 2.6 Student direction
explicit expectations and develops positive relationships between teacher and students
and among students.
Significance 3.1 Background 3.4 Inclusivity
This refers to pedagogy that helps make learning more meaningful and important to knowledge 3.5 Connectedness
students. Such pedagogy draws clear connections with students’ prior knowledge and 3.2 Cultural knowledge 3.6 Narrative
identities, with contexts outside of the classroom, and with multiple ways of knowing all 3.3 Knowledge
cultural perspective. integration
How the quality teaching elements you have identified are achieved within the
lesson.
3.4 Inclusivity Each student has a specific role through out the lesson even if they are not involved in a
game.
22
Time Teaching and learning actions Organisation Centred
T/S
15 Warm up Teacher:
Game 1
Group 1 vs Group 4
Group 2 vs Group 3
Game 2
Group 2 vs Group 5
Group 3 vs Group 4
Game 3
Group 1 vs Group 3
Group 4 vs Group 5
Group 2 – 2 scorekeepers, 2 referees and
Teacher helper
Game 4
Group 1 vs Group 5
Group 2 vs Group 4
Game 5
Group 1 vs Group 2
23
Group 3 vs Group 5
Finals
Team 1 vs Team 2
Team 3 vs Team 4
Game Rules
7 Game 1 Teacher:
Student:
Group 1 vs Group 4
Group 2 vs Group 3 Resources:
Student:
24
Group 2 vs Group 5
Resources:
Group 3 vs Group 4
7 Game 3 Teacher:
Student:
Group 1 vs Group 3 Resurces:
Group 4 vs Group 5
Group 2 – 2 scorekeepers, 2 referees and
Teacher helper
Student:
Group 1 vs Group 5
Group 2 vs Group 4 Resources:
7 Game 5 Teacher:
Student:
Group 1 vs Group 2
Group 3 vs Group 5 Resources:
7 Finals Teacher:
Student:
Team 1 vs Team 2
Resources:
25
Team 3 vs Team 4
26
Reflection
What have I learned about the teaching and learning process when preparing this
lesson?
Upon reflection, there is sufficient time needed to plan this lesson. The better the
preparation the smoother the lesson will run.
Other considerations
Complete the table blow by inserting the AISTL graduate standards that you are
demonstrating and indicates the evidence from this lesson that should comply with
the standard.
The games within the lesson support the inclusion of all students by
4.1 Support providing every student with a specific role.
student
participation
WHS
What are the key risk issues that may appear for and need to be reduced/eliminated
in this lesson? Using your syllabus and support documents as well as other WHS
policy- Outline the key WHS considerations that are to be applied in this lesson?
Make sure students are playing by the rules and there are minimal behaviour
problems. Make sure all equipment is safe to use. Ensure that there is a safe playing
27
environment.
28
Academic Justification
The three lesson plans were designed for the stage four unit of movement and skill,
specifically based on target games – catching and throwing. The aim of the three
lesson plans was to sequence learning and incorporate a game sense approach to
teaching, so students learn fundamental skills by tactical awareness and game
appreciation rather then skill execution drills. The three lesson plans also included
specific pedagogical practices to adhere to the NSW Quality Teaching Model.
All three lesson plans are strategically sequenced so that students can gradually build
on fundamental skills needed for basketball, which include catching, passing,
dribbling, shooting, special awareness and anticipation. The purpose of sequencing
the three lesson plans was to create a smooth transition between activities in order to
meet the outcomes of the lesson. Combs (2004) states that well sequenced lessons
provide a smoother functioning classroom with minimal disruptions. Furthermore,
Zhang and Quintana (2012) states that sequencing activities as well as lessons can
significantly reduce the stress of teachers, which can also help create an optimal
learning environment. The purpose of the sequential lessons was to initiate a game
sense approach to teaching, aimed to increase student’s skill, movement and tactical
awareness in preparation for the third lesson, which involves a whole class basketball
world cup lesson. In addition, Combs (2004) states that scaffolding sequenced lesson
plans allow teachers to anticipate any difficulties or problem areas within the lesson
and provide support where it’s needed. This is highly evident within the three lesson
plans where the activities are scaffolded so they increase in difficulty as the lesson
progresses. This was strategically implanted throughout out the first two lessons, so
the teacher could observe students skill level and modify the game by increasing or
decreasing the level of difficulty.
In addition to scaffolding, the three lesson plans include a high number of game sense
activities, so that the student focus is heavily on technique rather then skill-based
drills. By applying a game sense approach to the activities, this provides the
opportunity for students to develop a more substantive understanding about learning
the critical elements of game play (Pearson,Webb and Mckeen, 2006). The main
target was to develop students understanding of catching and throwing techniques
while still focusing on particular targets. By participating in game sense activities,
29
students are able to apply cognitive skills such as tactics, decision-making and
problem solving, which correlate to 1.3 and 1.4 of the NSW Quality Teacher Model
(Olosová and Zapletalová, 2015). The first lesson plan includes games, such as
dribbling survivor and catch-pass-catch so students can appreciate the basic concepts
of basketball without having prior knowledge to the game. The focus of the second
lesson plan was to ensure that students appreciate the concept of passing to open
teammates while maintaining possession and throwing to a particular target to score
points. This approach is very similar to basketball where players are trying to move
the ball up the court maintaining possession and shooting for a basket. The activities
in the second lesson plan vary with different targets so students a given the
opportunity to consider different tactics and create a more engaging approach. The
aim of creating engaging games is to increase student interest and also challenge
students to build success, which is relates to standard 2.2 of the NSW Quality
Teaching Model.
However, what sets the game sense approach apart compared to the traditional forms
of games and skill-based drills is the use of questioning and debrief questions.
Questioning can be a powerful method to enable players to analyse their actions and
generate tactical awareness, complying with the lesson outcomes. Pearson,Webb and
Mckeen (2006) states that questioning can be a powerful method that encourages
players to analyse their performance both and as an individual and as a team. This is
evident within the first two lesson plans where the teacher asks debrief questions after
the activity or when the games are being modified such as “How can the difficulty be
increased”, “why is it hard to tag the attacking team?” and “what can we do
differently to increase the chance of tagging the attacking team?”. The use of open-
ended questions is a great technique used to help guide players if they are struggling
with a specific activity. However, age, experience and ability level should be
considered to determine the complexity of the questions (Pearson,Webb and Mckeen,
2006). Furthermore, Light (2016) also states that debrief questions also help
encourage players to be tactically aware and make better decisions whilst developing
skills within a realistic concept of a game. In this case, this will help students have a
deeper understanding of basketball, which also correlates to standard 1.2 of the NSW
Quality Teaching Model.
30
Lastly other modifications were strategically imbedded in the lesson plans used as
differentiation techniques to help those students that may be physically or
intellectually impaired. These modifications are evident in the survivor activity where
students had the option to roll the basketball from hand to hand instead of dribbling in
the survivor game, as well as using different equipment such as the bell soccer ball to
assist with the catch-pass-catch game. The aim of including these modifications in the
lesson plans is to help assist these students with life skills deprived from the syllabus
such as LS.9, LS.21, LS.23, LS.25 and LS.26. Including these modifications also help
the inclusivity of physically or intellectually impaired students as well as giving the
opportunity to provide social support, addressing the standards 2.4 and 3.4 of the
NSW Quality Teaching Model.
31
References
Combs, D. (2004). A Framework for Scaffolding Content Area Reading Strategies. Middle School
Journal, 36(2)
Light, R. (2016). Implementing a game sense approach in youth sport coaching: Challenges, change
and resistance. Waikato Journal Of Education, 10(1)
Olosová, G., & Zapletalová, L. (2015). Immediate And Retention Effects Of Teaching Games For
Understanding Approach On Basketball Knowledge. Acta Facultatis Physical Education, 55(1).
Pearson, P., Webb, P., & Mckeen, K. (2006). Linking teaching games for understandingand quality
teaching in NSW seconday schools. The Hong Kong Institute Of Education, 34-46.
Zhang, M., & Quintana, C. (2012). Scaffolding strategies for supporting middle school students’ online
inquiry processes. Computers & Education, 58(1)
32