Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Cynthia J. Clark
AMU
09/5/2017
CLARK CASE STUDY’S 2
When searching for articles for the case studies, two articles gain my attention. Article 1:
The emotional dimensions of metaphors of change, and Using metaphors to teach organizations
theory. The purpose I had chosen these two articles was because all business uses some type of
Morgan’s metaphor. Education is one of the organizations that teach their students in the
metaphors and other details in the world. We will go over the details and the results of these
businesses by analyzing the emotions and how they are taught in organizational theory.
The cases study with the dimensions of metaphors of change, its purpose was to use
different metaphors to have insight on how the emotional outlook would be in the organizational
change and how easy would it be caught in the conventional language. With this study, they tried
to analyze the emotional feel of different organizations including education to see how it could
be implemented in the organizations. The problems are how to bridge the gap in the metaphors
with the staff in different settings. Example: Morgan (2006) refers to “organization as flux and
transformation.” Bartunek and Mock, 1987 uses first, second and third order change is an
overarching metaphor.
According to Tabor, metaphors are used teach systems thinking and to clarify concepts of
feelings and express them, especially with their own ideas. With this study, they had students do
various exercises with metaphors to have an understanding of them. The outcome of this exercise
was that the metaphors were not all that effective to every student. According to the findings
Proposed solutions
Through the emotional dimensions of the metaphors of change, the proposed solutions
would be to explore more of the emotional feeling that is embedded in the metaphors. This is
not just by actors or students. This would be a great lesson for the managers to help create
effective messages and to help their staff understand the responses and the changes.
Through the metaphors to teach organization theory, determines that if the metaphors are
to be effective they should help create images and vivid, concise and easy to understand. The
companies that use the metaphors sure suggest a resemblance to the new context in which they
are applied. This could evoke a strong, familiar, visual image. (Tabr,2007)
After reading through these studies, the recommendation for the is for the companies not
to pressure change on the managers to perform closely related to emotion. Managers are the key
to communicating not matter what company they work at. According to Smollan, “There was
just so much detail in managing the process we knew we couldn’t drop the call.” Another
similarly “It was the pressure, we had so many balls in the air and were juggling the priorities
and switching instantly from on to the next.” The company needs to help communicate how
specific they want their missions completed. Tabor had replied that the communication via
metaphors is accurate to the extent that the received message is appropriate and functional. If the
Takeaways/Benefits
My take away is that no matter who uses the Morgan metaphors is in our everyone
environment. If the managers’ staff has an open mind the metaphor views an organization as a
CLARK CASE STUDY’S 4
goal -oriented entity of differentiated components. The benefits are we can communicate for
Conclusion
It is understood that I needed to analyze one company, but in my eyes, all companies go
through rough times when it comes to metaphors. Education and organizational theory in
teaching are one of these organizations that use these metaphors. When emotion comes into play
then it controversy adds miscommunication and struggles. The benefits of the metaphors are to
be able to communicate with the staff more stable. Of If companies do exercises like the studies,
References