Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PREPARED BY
FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Table of Contents
i FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
ii FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
List of Tables
List of Figures
Figure 3.1 Location Map of Project Site ...................................................... 10
Figure 3.2 Satellite Image of the Project Site .............................................. 11
Figure 3.3 Master Layout........................................................................... 12
Figure 3.4 Existing Water Balance ............................................................. 72
Figure 3.5 Proposed Water Balance ........................................................... 73
Figure 4.1 Site Connectivity ....................................................................... 77
List of Annexures
Annexure – I: Land cum sale deed
Annexure – II: Raw Material Requirement
Annexure – III: Water Supply Letter from SIPCOT
Annexure – IV: Design details of Sewage Treatment Plant
Annexure –V: Design details of Effluent Treatment Plant
Annexure – VI: Green Belt Development
Annexure – VII: Consent for Establishment
Annexure VIII: Compliance to Consent
Annexure IX: Disclosure of Consultant
iv FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
2. INTRODUCTION
2.1 Identification of the Project & Project Proponent
2.1.1 Project
2 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
The unit currently manufactures one product and the proponent has
planned to increase the production capacity based on market demand. The
proposed change of product in A.P.I. production will fall under Schedule 5
(f) of the EIA Notification 2006. The existing facility is located within a
notified industrial area/estate i.e. Ranipet Industrial Area, Vellore which
comes under CEPI moratorium as per CPCB hence attracts general
conditions of EIA notification 2006 & treated as Category ‘A’ project,
requires prior Environmental Clearance from the Ministry of
Environment, Forests & Climate Change (MoEFCC).
2.3 Need of the project and its importance for the country
Bulk drugs have become a part of our life for sustaining many of our
day-to-day activities, preventing and controlling diseases. Bulk drugs
manufacturing sector in India is well established and has recorded a steady
growth in the overall Indian industrial scenario. The bulk drugs and allied
industries have been amongst the fastest growing segments of the Indian
industry.
3 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
The Indian API industry is moving at a sizzling pace and we are fast
gearing up to cash in on the bright export market prospects in next two
years. In terms of global ranking, India is now the third largest API
producers of the world just after China and Italy, and by end 2015, it is
expected to be the second largest producer after China. However, in Drug
Master File (DMF) filings India is currently ahead of China.
The API industry is poised for a bigger league in the global landscape
by 2015 due to the global drug off patent cliff. Indian API manufacturers
are likely to benefit as market dynamics undergo a major change in the
Asian subcontinent. India, Japan and China are expected to receive a
windfall of about $55-60 billion in the next two years, which is
unprecedented. As per estimates, Indian companies are expected to grab a
substantial share of the pie from the regulated markets, such as the US
and EU, which are saddled with mounting pricing pressures from low cost
providers in developing markets and backward and forward integration by
some generic companies.
Today, the API landscape in India is quite promising due to the robust
research-based processes, low cost operations and availability of skilled
manpower. The global economic slowdown further amplified the growth
prospects of the API sectors in India, Japan and China, which on the other
hand restricted the growth in developed economies such as the US and
Europe and helped to fuel the growth in the Asian markets.
4 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
5 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
2.4 Import
The import value of pharmaceuticals was Rs. 6,680 crore in past few
years. The imports are mainly raw materials, which account for around
70% of the imports. Imports have been growing at a CAGR of 18.4%. The
key exporting countries to India are China, Switzerland, US and Germany.
China is the largest exporter to India and accounted for 40% of the import
value in 2007-08.
(Source: Report of the Task Force, Ministry of Commerce & Industry)
6 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
drugs and pharmaceuticals have registered strong growth during the last
few years. Exports have increased at a 5-year CAGR of 18% to around Rs.
29,100 crore in 2007-2008. India’s pharmaceutical exports are primarily to
US, Germany, Russia, UK, and Nigeria.US is the largest export market
accounting for 19% of the exports in 2007-08. India exports full basket of
pharmaceutical products comprising intermediates, APIs, Finished Dosage
Combinations (FDCs), biopharmaceuticals, vaccines, clinical services, etc.,
to various parts of the world.
7 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed activity will be carried out within the existing production
facility at Plot no. 7B & 7C, SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Ranipet – 632 403,
Vellore district, Tamil Nadu. The Environmental setting of the project site is
presented in the Table 3.1.The location map of the project area is
represented in Figure 3.1. The satellite imagery showing the project site is
given in Figure 3.2 & site layout in Figure 3.3.
8 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
9 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
10 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
11 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
12 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
The proposed change of products will take place within the existing
facility owned & operated by M/s Malladi Drugs & Pharmaceuticals. This
site has the following advantages:
13 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Existing Proposed
Sr. Qty Qty
Product
No
Mt / M Mt / M
1 Pseudo Ephedrine Hcl 12 40
2 Alprazolam 0.12 0.1
3 Propranolol Hcl 24 0
4 Atenolol 48 0
5 Albendazole 0.18 0
6 Theophylline 3 0
7 Dapsone 1.8 0
8 Phenylepherine 0 10
9 Triprolidine 0 0.5
10 Cyclene 0 5
11 Bosentan 0 0.5
12 Methylphenidate 0 0.08
13 Eta ephedrine 0 0.05
14 DL - Ritalinic acid 0 3
15 D-Ritalinic Acid 0 0.5
16 L - Oxa 0 10
17 Dl - Oxa 0 10
18 Lorazepam 0 0.05
19 Amlodipine 0 1
20 Tranaxemic acid 0 5
21 Seligiline 0 0.05
Total 89.1 85.83
14 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Manufacturing process
A. Process Description:
Stage: 1
L-Ephedrine hydrochloride is basified with caustic solution to obtain l-
ephedrine base which is extracted with toluene to separate aqueous layer
and finally partially distilled off solvent to obtain l- ephedrine in solvent.
Stage-2
L-Ephedrine base in solvent obtained in stage-1 is added to acetic anhydride
and subsequently treated with sulphuric acid. Then toluene and acetic acid
mixture is distilled out to obtain acetyl ephedrine.
Stage-3
Acetyl ephedrine obtained in the previous stage is mixed with water, heated
to boil, basified with caustic solution in toluene medium. Then the aqueous
layer is taken for further extraction and aqueous layer is discarded. The
base in toluene medium is washed with de - mineralized water and toluene
is recovered cooled and centrifuged to obtain pseudo ephedrine base as
solid.
Stage- 4
Pseudoephedrine base is acidified with hydrochloric acid, bleached with
activated carbon and filtered to obtain filtered pseudoephedrine
hydrochloride in solution. This solution is concentrated and crystallized by
distilling off excess water, centrifuged, dried and get Pseudoephedrine
Hydrochloride.
15 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Material Balance
S.N Qty. Qty.(
Stage Name Inputs Outputs
o (kg/d) kg/d)
Water + Sodium
chloride179 Kg +
DM water 900 1129
25 Kg Sodium
l - Eph Base hydroxide
Preparation Caustic Soda Distilled Toluene
144 280
1. 20A Flakes recycle
l-Eph.base in
l - Eph.salt 600 680
Toluene
Toluene vapour
Toluene 473 29
loss
2117 2117
2. Acetylation l - Eph.Base in 680 Rec.acetic acid 840
16 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
17 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
3.5.2 Alprazolam
Manufacturing process
A. Process Description:
Alprazolam is anxiolytic, a short-acting drug of the benzodiazepine class
used to treat moderate to severe anxiety disorders, panic attacks, and as an
adjunctive treatment for anxiety associated with clinical depression. The
stage wise preparation details are listed below.
Stage- 1
2 Amino 5 chloro benzophenone, chloro acetyl chloride and acetic acid are
charged into a glass lined reactor to get chloroacetamide 5 chloro
benzophenone.
Stage- 2
The isolated chloroacetamide compound is charged into a stainless steel
reactor along with hexamine, ammonium carbonate and methanol refluxed
for sufficient time to get dimethyl diazepem.
Stage- 3
This is taken into a stainless steel reactor and polysulphide i.e.
phosphorous pentasulphide, sodium bicarbonate and acetonitrile are
charged. On completion of the reaction sulphadiazepam is obtained.
Stage- 4
18 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
This sulpha diazepam, Acetyhydrazide compound and iso propyl alcohol are
charged into a stainless steel reactor and refluxed to get alprazolam
intermediate.
Stage- 5
The alprazolam intermediate is refluxed with xylene to get alprazolam crude.
This crude is dissolved with methanol, bleached with carbon, filtered
through hyflow bed, concentrated, cooled and centrifuged to get alprazolam.
19 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
20 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
50.50Kg
Ammonium 11.5 11. Recovered
0 Reactant 133.6
04 carbonate 0 5 Methanol
50.0 Recovered
DM water 0 50 Reactant 18.7
05 0 Toluene
20.0
Toluene 0 20 Solvent Toluene Loss 1.3
06 0
Stage 3: Thione Preparation
21 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
5 t
Hydrazine Reactan
02 18.00 0 18 IPA 130.8
Hydrate t
Isopropyl 141.0 14
03 0 Solvent IPA Loss 10.2
alcohol 0 1
water100Kg+Hy
04 Toluene 39.00 0 39 Solvent drogen 119.5
sulphide19.5Kg
DM 100.0 10 Reactan
05 0 Toluene 36.5
Water 0 0 t
Ethyl
06 52.00 0 52 Solvent Toluene Loss 2.5
Acetate
07 Acetone 10.00 0 10 Solvent Ethylacetate 52
Acetone 9
Acetone Loss 1
Stage 5: Crude Alprazolam Preparation
Input Material (kg/d) Output Materials (kg/d)
Raw materials (Chemicals) Reacta Effluent to ETP Recover By
S.No Name of the Produc Residu Los
Nam Fresh Recycle Tota nt / Qt Organi Inorgan y/ Produc
. Output ts e s
e Input d Input l Solvent y c Imp. ic Imp. Recycle ts
15.0 Reactan Crude
01 Inter 15.00 0 12.5
0 t Alprazolam
Xylen 127.5 127.
02 0 Solvent Xylene 125
e 0 5
Xylene Loss 2.5
Crude ML 2.5
Stage 6: Purification
Input Material (kg/d) Output Materials (kg/d)
Raw materials (Chemicals) Effluent to ETP Recove
Fres Reactan Name of By
S.N Recyc Orga Inorga ry/ Produ Resid
h Tot t/ the Q Produ Loss
o. Name led nic nic Recycl cts ue
Inpu al Solvent Output ty cts
Input Imp. Imp. e
t
22 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
23 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
3.5.3 Phenylepherine
Manufacturing process
Process Description
l- Phenylephrine hydrochloride is a mydriatic and a decongestant.
Phenylephrine is a α-adrenergic receptor agonist used as an agent to dilate
the pupil and to increase blood pressure. Phenylephrine has recently been
marketed as a substitute for pseudoephedrine. The following lists the
various stages in the synthesis of l- Phenylephrine hydrochloride.
Stage 1:
The alpha-methyl-m-hydroxyacteophenone sulphate undergoes
hydrogenation in the presence of palladium on carbon catalyst to produce
dl-phenylephrine base.
Stage 2:
The dl-phenylephrine base further undergoes resolution by using tartaric
acid to obtain d-phenylephrine bitartrate as a solid and l-phenylephrine
bitartrate as liquid.
Stage 3:
L-phenylephrinebitartrate further basified with ammonia solution and
centrifuged to get l-phenylephrine base.
Stage 4:
D-phenylephrinebitartrate further basified with ammonia solution and
centrifuged to get d-phenylephrine base.
Stage 5:
D-phenylephrine base undergoes inversion by adding acetic anhydride and
H2SO4 to produce l-phenylephrine base.
Stage 6:
The l-phenylephrine base obtained is treated with hydrochloric acid to
produce l- phenylephrine hydrochloride.
24 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Material Balance
Stage - I Hydrogenation- 9A
Qty in
Qty in
S.NO Input Output Kg/Bat
Kg/Batch
ch
01 MAAP sulphate 320 dl-Phenylephrine Base 215
Palladium
02 DM Water 760 12
catalyst(Recycle)
dl-Phenylephrine Base
03 Palladium catalyst 9 1070
ML(Recycle)
04 Hydrogen in m3 0 Activated carbon 4
05 Activated carbon 2
06 Liquor ammonia 210 0 0
25 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Stage II-9B
Qty in Qty in
S.NO Input Output
Kg/day Kg/day
dl-Phenylephrine d-Phenylephrine
500 437.5
Base bitartarate
l-Phenylephrine
01 Tartaric acid 500 1750
bitartarate ML(Recycle)
02 Iso Propyl alcohol 938.125
03 DM Water 250
Total 2188.125 Total 2187.5
Stage II no ETP Load.
Stage – III-9C
Qty in Qty in
S.NO Input Output
kg/day kg/day
l-Phenylephrine
01 1750 l-Phenylephrine base 225
bitartarate ML
l-Phenylephrine base
02 DM Water 725 1625
ML(Recycle)
03 Activated carbon 3 Distilled IPA 967.5
04 Liquor ammonia 368.75 IPA Distillation loss 29
Total 2846.75 Total 2846.5
9CM
l-Phenylephrine dl-Phenylephrine
01 1625 81.25
base ML(Recycle) Base
dl-Phenylephrine
02 DM Water 62.5 1756.25
Base ML(Recycle)
03 Liquor ammonia 150
9AM 1837.5 1837.5
26 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
dl-Phenylephrine dl-Phenylephrine
01 1756 38
Base ML(Recycle) Base
dl-Phenylephrine
02 DM Water 231 500
Base ML(Recycle)
03 Methanol 125 Ammonium Tartarate 231
Water+Methanol
04 Liquor ammonia 63 156
recovered
Dil Sulphuric Methanol distillation
05 44 13
acid loss
Water 1281
2218.75 2218.75
Stage III The ETP Load (kg) 1281
Stage III ETP Load for 10 MT (kg) 43562.5
Stage III Ammonium Tartarate (kg) 231.25
Stage III Ammonium Tartarate for 10 MT(kg) 7862.5
Stage – IV 9D
Qty in Qty in
S.NO Input Output
kg/day kg/day
d-
01 Phenylephrine 400 d-Phenylephrine base 170
bitartarate
d-Phenylephrine base
02 DM Water 580 1160
ML(Recycle)
Liquor
03 350
ammonia
Total 1330 Total 1330
d-
Phenylephrine
01 1160 dl-Phenylephrine Base 29
Base
ML(Recycle)
dl-Phenylephrine Base
02 DM Water 143 274
ML(Recycle)
03 Methanol 69 Ammonium Tartarate 200
Liquor
04 57 Water+Methanol recovered 109
ammonia
Dil Sulphuric
05 29 Methanol distillation loss 17
acid
Water 829
1457 1457
Stage IV The ETP Load (kg) 828.7
Stage IV ETP Load for 10 MT(kg) 30661.0
Stage IV Ammonium Tartarate (kg) 200.0
Stage IV Ammonium Tartarate for 10 MT(kg) 7400.9
Stage –V-9E
27 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Qty in Qty in
S.NO Input Output
kg/day kg/day
d-Phenylephrine
01 320 l-Phenylephrine base 309
base
l-Phenylephrine base
02 Aceticanhdride 1280 2100
ML(Recycle)
03 Sulphuric acid 219.5 Acetic acid(85%) Sale 1432
04 DM Water 1680 Acetic acid Distillation loss 56
05 Activated carbon 3 Activated carbon 6.5
06 Liquor ammonia 400
Total 3903 Total 3903
l-Phenylephrine
01 2099.5 dl-Phenylephrine Base 77.35
Base ML(Recycle)
dl-Phenylephrine Base
02 DM Water 276.25 751
ML(Recycle)
03 Methanol 154.7 Ammonium Sulphate 232
04 Liquor ammonia 88.4 Water+Methanol recovered 155
Dil Sulphuric
05 55.25 Methanol distillation loss 22
acid
Water 1437
2674.1 2674.1
Stage – VI- 9F
Qty in Qty in
S.NO Input Output
kg/day kg/day
01 l-Phenylephrine base 320 l-Phenylephrine base 250
l-Phenylephrine base
02 Iso Propyl alcohol 1260 1730
ML(Recycle)
03 DM Water 420 Iso propyl alcohol loss 20
Total 2000 Total 2000
Stage VI no ETP Load.
Stage – VII 9G
Qty in Qty in
S.NO Input Output
kg/day kg/day
l-Phenylephrine
01 400 l-Phenylephrine base 380
base
l-Phenylephrine base
02 DM Water 1100 1878
ML(Recycle)
Dil. Sulphuric
03 380 Activated carbon 5
acid
28 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
04 Activated carbon 3
05 Liquor ammonia 380
Total 2263 Total 2263
l-Phenylephrine
01 Base 1878 l-Phenylephrine Base 60
ML(Recycle)
dl-Phenylephrine Base
02 DM Water 240 530
ML(Recycle)
03 Methanol 130 Ammonium Sulphate 230
04 Liquor ammonia 70 Water+Methanol recovered 150
Dil Sulphuric
05 52 Methanol distillation loss 20
acid
Water 1380
2370 2370
Stage VII The ETP Load (kg) 1380
Stage VII ETP Load for 10 MT (kg) 38640
Stage VII Ammonium sulphate (kg) 230
Stage VII Ammonium sulphate for 10 MT(kg) 6440
Stage – VIII-9H
Qty in Qty in
S.NO Input Output
kg/day kg/day
l-Phenylephrine
01 400 l-Phenylephrine HCl Crude 380
base
l-Phenylephrine HCl Crude
02 DM Water 125 625
ML(Recycle)
03 HCl 250 Water Recovered 375
Activated
04 7.5 Water distillation loss 37.5
carbon
Activated carbon+Hyflow
05 Hyflow supercell 0 9
supercell
IPA 325
Methanol 320
Total 1428 Total 1426.5
Stage VIII The ETP Load is 375
Stage VIII ETP Load for 10 MT is 9750
29 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
05 Methanol 248
Total 829.5 Total 829
Stage IX no ETP Load.
3.5.4 Triprolidine
Process Description
30 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
31 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Material balance
Stage I
Stage II
Stage III
32 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
3.5.5 Cyclene
Manufacturing Process
This is an intermediate to make MRI contrast agent. Detailed here
below are the various stages involved in the manufacture of cyclene.
STAGE -1 - Hydrogenation
Benzaldehyde is hydrogenated in presence of ethanolamine and
isopropyl alcohol (IPA) as medium to form n-benzyl ethanolamine. Recovered
IPA & unreacted mixture are recovered by distillation and reused for the
next batch.
STAGE -2 - Cylization
n-benzyl ethanolamine is treated with sulphuric acid in toluene
medium and diluted with water and then neutralised with sodium hydroxide
and distilled. During distillation n-benzylaziridine is obtained. This is
treated with methanol and para toluene sulphonic acid and neutralised with
sodium hydroxide and centrifuged to get crude tetra benzyl cyclene. This is
further purified with ethyl acetate and gets Tetra benzyl cyclene.
STAGE -3 - Hydrogenation
Pure tetra benzyl cyclene is dissolved in water and treated with
hydrochloric acid and hydrogenated in presence of Palladium on carbon
catalysts. The hydrogenated mass is neutralised with sodium hydroxide and
centrifuged to get crude cyclene. Crude cyclene is recrystallised with water
and get Cyclene.
33 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Material Balance
Stage – I
Stage – II
Sl.N Wate Inorgan Organ
o. INPUT OUTPUT r ic ic
Uni
Name of Chemicals t Qty Name of Product Qty
1 N-BENZYLE EHANOLAMINE kg 400 CRUDE TBC 315.0
RECOVERED
3034.1
2 TOLUENE kg 3096 TOLUENE(RECYCLE)
3 SULPHURIC ACID kg 392 TOLUENE LOSS 61.9
4 Raw water kg 5200 Aziridine layer to ETP 3300.0 2640 660.0
5 SODIUM HYDROXIDE kg 600 METHANOL recovered 2334.2
6 Water for caustic soln ppn 600 Methanol loss 68.0
7 METHANOL kg 2457 Lees 5100.0 4692 408.0
PARA TOLUENE SULPHONIC
160.2
8 ACID kg 200 EA layer ( Recycle)
34 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
3337.
TOTAL 5 TOTAL 3337.5 0 100 150
Stage IV (Crude Cyclene)
Sl.No Wate Inorgani Organi
. INPUT OUTPUT r c c
Uni
Name of Chemicals t Qty Name of Product Qty
1 PURE TETRA kg 200 CRUDE CYCLEN 120
35 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
BENZYLE CYCLEN
2 DM WATER kg 600 TOLUENE(RECYCLE) 50
PALLADIUM CARBON
3 HYDROCHLORIC ACID kg 90 (RECYCLE) 1.285625
4 PALLADIUM CARBON kg 1.5125 Crude cyclen ML 465 465.0
5 CAUSTIC SODA kg 140 Distilled water to ETP 540 540.0
6 Water for caustic ppn kg 150 Distillation loss 5
1181.5 1181.28562
TOTAL 1 TOTAL 5 540 465 0
36 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
3.5.6 Bosentan
Process description
37 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
38 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Material balance
Stage - I
Qty Qty
S.No Input Output
in Kg in Kg
ChloroSulfonamide
01 BP-Dichloro 28 50
(Dry)
02 Toluene 457 water 10
03 TBBSA 19 Mother liquor( Toluene) 422
04 Potassium carbonate 13 Vapour loss 36
05 TBAB 1
Total 518 Total 518
Stage - II
Qty in Qty in
S.No Input Output
Kg/day Kg/day
ChloroSulfonamide 50 Distilled Ethylene 56
01
(Dry) glycol
02 Ethylene glycol 839 Mother liquor( MEG) 800
03 DM Water 30 Vapour loss 33
Caustic soda 30 Bosantan sodium salt 60
04
crude
Total 949 Total 949
Stage - III
Qty Qty
S.No Input Output
in Kg in Kg
Bosantan sodium salt 60 Bosantan sodium salt 38
01
crude pure
02 Seed 1 Mother liquor( ACE ) 720
03 ACE mixture 705 Vapour loss 8
Total 766 Total 766
Stage – IV
Qty Qty
S.No Input Output
in Kg in Kg
Bosantan sodium salt Bosantan monohydrate
01 38 35
pure
02 Acetone 395 Distilled acetone 195
Mother liquor
03 DM water 73 220
( Water+Acetone )
04 HCL 8 Vapour loss 50
05 Sodium chloride salt 15
Total 515 Total 515
39 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
3.5.7 Methylphenidate
Process Description
Methyl phenidate is a prescriptionstimulant commonly used to treat
Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). It is also one of the primary
drugs used to treat the daytime drowsiness symptoms of narcolepsy and
chronic fatigue syndrome. The drug is used to treat cancer-related fatigue.
Methanol and threo-ritalinic acid and methanol are charged, stirred
and heated. Then hydrochloric acid gas is passed. The mass is heated and
distilled off methanol partially, cooled to 0°C and centrifuged to get crude
methylphenidate hydrochloride. Then the crude is re crystallised with DM
water and centrifuged washed with acetone to get methylphenidate
hydrochloride. The wet methylphenidate hydrochloride is dried.
40 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
41 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Material Balance
Stage -61A
Total Total
S.N Quanti Quanti
Input Qty in Output Loss Qty
o. ty ty
kg in kg
Threo- Crude
1 100.0 85 Kg 85
Ritalinic acid 100 Kg Methylphenidate
0
HCl HCl
Methylphenidate
21 Kg 21.00
HCl (as residue)
Recovered 211.0
2 Methanol 247 Kg 277 211 Kg
methanol 0
Consumption of 12.5
12.50
methanol Kg
Evaporation loss 47.5
47.50
of methaol Kg
HCl
Hydrochloric 118.0 14.5
3 118 Kg consumption for 14.50
acid 35% 0 Kg
reaction
26.8
Evaporation loss 26.80
Kg
Sulphuric 122.7 122.7
4 46 Kg 46.00 Mother liquor
acid Kg 0
541.0 541.
Total Total
0 00
Stage - 61B
S. Total Total
No Input Qty Qty in Output Qty Loss Qty in
. kg kg
Crude Pure
100 80
1 Methylphenida 100 Methylphenidate 80
Kg Kg
te HCl HCl
Methylphenidate 18
18
HCl (residue) Kg
Activated 387
2 1 Kg 1 Distilled water 387
Carbon Kg
50
Evaporation loss 50
Kg
Mother liquor + 60
3 Hyflowsupercel 1 Kg 1 60
Acetone wash Kg
Evaporation loss 8 Kg 8
435 2.0
4 Water 435 Spent carbon 2
Kg Kg
70 2.0
5 Acetone 70 Spent Hyflow 2
Kg Kg
Total 607 Total 607
42 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Process Description
43 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
44 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Material balance
S. Qty in Qty in
Stage Name Inputs Outputs
No kg kg
Water +
Sodium
chloride 179
DM water 900 1129
Kg + 25 Kg
1. l - Eph Base Sodium
Preparation hydroxide
28A Distilled
Caustic Soda
144 Toluene 280
Flakes
recycle
l-Eph.base in
l - Eph.salt 600 680
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene 473 29
vapour loss
2117 2117
l Ephedrine base 200
Etafedrine 230
Acetonitrile 825.3
base crude
Sodium carbonate Recovered 786
160
(Anhydrous) Acetonitrile
Ethyl 250
l-Ephedrine base Ethyl bromide 240
bromide salt
2. to Etafedrine Recovered 645
base crude DM water 420
Toluene
28B Toluene 688 Vapour loss 672
Caustic soda
40
flakes
Sodium sulphate
10
(anhydrous)
2583.3 2583
Etafedrine
Etafedrine base
base 1st
crude
300 fraction 40
Etafedrine
base Main
fraction 260
300 300
4. Etafedrine
Etafedrine base 220
HCl 220
Etafedrine base
Recovered
to Etafedrine HCl
Hydrochloric acid 115 Isopropyl
28D
alcohol 397.5
Mother
Activated carbon 1
Liquor 795
45 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Process description
dl - Ritalinic acid HCl crude is purified with isopropyl alcohol and centrifuge
to get dl - Ritalinic acid HCl.
46 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Material Balance
Stage - 51A
S.No INPUT Total qty OUTPUT Quantity loss Total qty
in kg in kg in kg
1 alpha-Phenyl-
2-piperidyl
115.5 Material 100.485 100.485
acetamide
(erythro rich)
2 Potassium Mother
144.375 544.005 77.385 621.39
hydroxide 85% liquor
3 Water 462
Total 721.875 Total 721.875
47 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Stage - 51B
S.N Input Total Output Quanti loss Total
o qty in ty in qty in
kg kg kg
1 Stage -51A 100.4 Stage - 51B 116.5 116.56
2 Water 246.1 HCl crude 14.16 16.9 31.15
during reaction
3 Hydrochloric 45.22 Distilled water 220.0 24.1 244.18
acid 35%
4 Isopropyl 157.7 Isopropyl 127.6 30.1 157.76
alcohol alcohol
5 Dichlorometha 1396.74 Dichlorometha 743.5 653. 1396.74
ne ne 1
6 Total 1946.39 Total 1946.39
Stage - 51C
S.No Input Total Output quantity loss Total
qty in qty in
kg kg
Stage -
1 Stage - 51B 116.563 90.44 90.44
51C
Hydrochloric
2 316.47 HCl gas 16.6801 93.833 110.51
acid 35%
Distilled
3 Water 1004.77 1060.02 150.72 1210.74
water
Mother
Isopropyl
4 78.878 liquor + 62.7923 16.07 78.866
alcohol
IPA wash
Residue 26.1217 26.12
Total 1516.68 Total 1516.67
Stage - 51D
S.No Input Total Output Quantity loss Total
qty in in kg qty in
kg kg
1 Stage -
90.436 Stage - 51D 58.78 58.784
51C
2 Water 180.87 A.Carbon 2.261 0.452 2.713
3 A.Carbon 2.71 Distilled water 149.220 31.653 180.873
4 Isopropyl Mother liquor
70.993 56.523 14.470 70.993
alcohol + IPA wash
Residue 31.653 31.653
Total 345.015 Total 345.015
48 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Stage - 53A
S.No Input Total Output Quantity loss Total
qty in in kg qty in
kg kg
1 Stage - 51D 58.78 Stage - 53A 50.025 50.025
2 Ammonia
DM water 352.70 4.232 0.411 4.644
complex
3 Ammonia Mother
45.85 361.520 41.149 402.668
hydroxide10% liquor
Total 457.337 Total 457.337
Process description
Charge MIBK, DM water and d-threo-Ritalinic acid DBTA complex pure into
reactor. Cool the mass and adjust the pH by using HCl. Separate the
aqueous and MIBK layer and extracted with 10% HCl solution. filtered the
mass. Concentrated the aqueous layer completely. Add IPA and
concentrated under vacuum to remove the traces of water. Add IPA and
heat to dissolve, cool the mass and centrifuge to get d-threo-Ritalinic HCl.
49 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Material balance
STAGE 68A
S.N Qty in
o Input Qty in kg Output kg
1. DM water 400 Material 36.25
2. Methanol+Water
Methanol
450 ML 980
3. Methanol Vapour
dl-threo-Ritalinic acid
25 loss 29.25
50 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
4. Methanol 75
5. (+)-Dibenzoyl-D-
tartaric acid
monohydrate 45.5
6. DM water + MeOH 50
Total 1045.5 Total 1045.5
STAGE 68B
STAGE 68C
S.N Qty in Qty in
o Input kg Output kg
1. DM water 50 MIBK Layer 66
2. MIBK 69.4 MIBK Loss 3.4
3. Add HCl solution 8 MIBK Layer 30
4. Charge MIBK to Aqueous layer 32 MIBK Loss 4
5. Spent
Stir, settle & layer separation
carbon 2
6. Add HCl solution (DM water + Distilled
HCl) 10.2 water 50
7. Charge Activated carbon 1 Distilled IPA 18
8. Distill under vacuum (60%) IPA loss 5
9. Charge IPA (2 times) 20 Wet Material 13.2
10. Charge IPA 20 IPA ML 19
Total 210.6 Total 210.6
Process description
51 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
The resultant mass was heated to reflux and maintained the reflux condition
by removing the ethanol and toluene azeotrope. Cool the mass, washed with
water to remove the inorganic and further it is crystallized by adding
heptane. Centrifuge the mass to get (4S, 5R)-4-Methyl-5-phenyl-2-
oxazolidinone.
52 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Material balance
Qty Total
S.N Stage Qty
Inputs in kg Qty in Outputs
o Name in kg
kg
DM water 3.25 975 Wet 270
Toluene 5.83 1749 Recovered Toluene 1200
Recovered Toluene +
01. 63A l-PPA 300 300 1400
Ethanol
Caustic
- 100 n-Heptane ML 2800
solution
NaCl 0.08 24 Aq.layer 1100
Sodium
0.17 51 Vapour loss 142
sulphate
Hyflow - 2 Solid waste 70
DEC 0.76 228
Sodium
- 25
ethoxide
Toluene 3.63 1089
DM water
0 750
wash
n-Heptane 5.63 1689
6982 6982
3.5.12 DL - oxazolidinone
Process description
The resultant mass is heated to reflux and maintain the reflux condition by
removing the ethanol and toluene azeotrope, Cool the mass, washed with
water to remove the inorganic and further it is crystallized by adding
heptane. Centrifuge the mass to get 4-Methyl-5-phenyl-2-oxazolidinone
Crude (wet)
53 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Material balance
54 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Toluene 400
DM water wash 291
n-Heptane 2427
Water- I
1200 1200
2. 62C purification
Water- II
1200 1200
Purification
Total 10099 10099
3.5.13 Lorazepam
Process description
STAGE – 1
STAGE – 2
STAGE – 3 & 4
55 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Material Balance
Stage – I
Qty in Qty in
S. No Input Output
Kg Kg
01 Acetic acid 120 Acetyl Lorazepam 48.0
02 Lactem 40 Mother liquor 225
03 Acetic anhydride 43 Vapour loss 24
04 Methanol 94
05
Total 297 Total 297
Stage – II
Qty in Qty in
S. No Input Output
Kg Kg
01 Methanol 301.5 Lorazepam crude 15.8
02 67A material 17.5 Mother liquor 550
03 Caustic soln 4.6 Vapour loss 22
04 Acetic acid 5.8 Spent carbon 2.50
05 DM water 259.5
06 Activated carbon 1.1
Total 590 Total 590
56 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Stage – III
Qty in Qty in
S. No Input Output
Kg Kg
01 Acetonitrile 200 Lorazepam 22
02 67B material 20 Mother liquor 175
03 Vapour loss 23
Total 220 Total 220
Stage – IV
Qty in Qty in
S. No Input Output
Kg Kg
03 Cyclohexane 242 Lorazepam 19.5
04 67C material 15 Distillout 75.0
05 Mother liquor 140
Vapour loss 22
Total 257 Total 257
3.5.14 Amlodipine
Process Description
STAGE 1
STAGE 2
57 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
STAGE 3
STAGE 4
STAGE 5
58 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Material Balance
Stage – I
Qty in Qty in
S.NO Input Output
Kg Kg
Pthaleic Anhydride N-(2-Hydroxyethyl)
01 450 500
phthalimide
59 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Stage – II
Qty Qty in
S.NO Input Output
in Kg Kg
Ethyl, 4-{2-
N-(2-Hydroxyethyl) (Phthalimido) ethoxy}
01 200 2030
phthalimide acetoacetate) (Organic
layer)
02 Sodium hydride 100 Water wash - layer 4000
03 Ethyl 4 Chloro acetate 188 Toluene residue 50
04 Acetic acid 473 Toluene vapour loss 17
05 Toluene 1446
06 DM Water 2000
DM Water (Toluene
07 1675
Purification)
Sodium carbonate
08 15
(Toluene Purification)
Total 6097 Total 6097
Stage – III
Qty Qty in
S.NO Input Output
in Kg Kg
Ethyl, 4-{2-(Phthalimido) 2030 Pthalimido Amlodipine 205
01 ethoxy} acetoacetate)
(Organic layer)
02 Piperidine 12 Water + acetic acid ML 2890
03 Acetic Acid 1057 Organic residue 22
Ortho Chloro 140 Recovered Toluene 1500
04
Benzaldehyde
05 DM Water 800 Toluene loss 8
3 Methyl Amino 186
06
crotonate
07 Ethyl Acetate 400
Total 4625 Total 4625
60 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Stage – IV
Qty Qty in
S.NO Input Output
in Kg Kg
01 Pthalimido Amlodipine 356 Amlodipine Base 210
Water based ML (
02 Acetic ACid 49 6350
water +methanol)
03 Methanol 577 MMA Based ML 2150
04 MMA 40 % 2250 Spent Hyflo 6
05 EDTA 13 Water vapour loss 32
06 Hyflo 3
07 DM Water 5500
Total 8748 Total 8748
Stage – V
Qty Qty in
S.NO Input Output
in Kg Kg
01 Amlodipine Base 175 Amlodipine Besilate 210
02 Benzene Sulfonic Acid 70 IPA ML 1385
03 Petrolem Ether 405 IPA + Ether ML 1190
04 IPA 2115 Vapour loss 16
05 DM Water 36
06
07
Total 2801 Total 2801
3.5.15 Selegeline
Process Description
Stage - I
Charge chloroform, d-Ephedrine HCl in to Round bottom flask and raised
the temperature add thionyl chloride and stir. Add benzene to slurry the
mass, centrifuge, wash with acetone and dry the material to get Chloro d-
Ephedrine HCl
Stage - II
Charge DM water, Chloro d-Ephedrine HCl and activated carbon bleach and
filter. Charge filtrate and 5% Palladium on BaSo4 in to hydrogenator and
pass hydrogenation to complete the reaction. Filter the mass.
61 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Stage - III
Charge filtrate and adjust pH by using lye solution. Start steam distillation
and extract with benzene. Distil out benzene atmospherically followed by
vacuum distillationto get desoxy base.
Stage - IV
Charge desoxy base, acetone, potassium carbonate, potassium iodide and
Propargyl chloride heat the mass to 50°C and stir. Cool the mass and filter,
wash with acetone. Charge the filtrate and distil out acetone atmospherically
and vacuum to get Crude Selegeline Base.
Stage - V
Charge Crude Selegeline base and fractional distillation to be carried out to
get pure Selegeline base.
Stage - VI
Charge Pure Selegeline base, acetone and add IPA/HCl to adjust pH,
centrifuge and wash with acetone to get Selegeline HCl.
62 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
63 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Material Balance
Stage – I
Stage Name Inputs Kgs Outputs Kgs
Chloro d- d-Ephedrine HCl Chloro d-Ephedrine
5.00
Ephedrine 5.00 HCl
Chloroform Chloro d-Ephedrine
HCl
ML 10.21Kg+ 14.58
Preparation
9.37 Chloroform9.37Kg
Thionyl chloride 5.21 Benzene recovered 10.83
Benzene 11.25 Acetone recovered 6.04
Acetone 6.25 Acetone Loss 0.21
Benzene Loss 0.42
37.08 37.08
Stage – II
Stage Name Inputs Kgs Outputs Kgs
Hydrogenation DM water 12.51 Desoxy base 2.08
Chloro d-
4.17 Recovered Benzene 33.36
Ephedrine HCl
Activated carbon 0.07 Benzene Loss 2.78
Palladium Palladium Catalyst
0.42 0.42
Catalyst on BaSo4 on BaSo4 (recycle)
H2 Cylinders
2.78 Sodium Sulphate 0.34
Cu.M
N2 Cylinders
0.69 Activated carbon 0.07
Cu.M
Caustic Soda water12.51Kg+HCl
6.95 21.55
flakes 9.04Kg
Stage – III
Stage Name Inputs Kgs Outputs Kgs
Selegeline Deoxy base 2.08 Selegiline Base 1.56
base
Acetone 18.22 Recovered Acetone 16.92
preparation
Propyl chloride 1.30 Recovered Benzene 26.03
Potassium
1.93 Acetone Loss 1.30
Carbonate
Potassium Iodide 2.29 Benzene Loss 1.30
Potassium
Sodium Sulphate 0.65 1.93
Carbonate
DM water 7.81 Potassium Iodide 2.29
64 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Stage – IV
Stage Name Inputs Kgs Outputs Kgs
Selegiline base 1.56 Selegiline HCl Crude 1.25
Acetone 10.93 Selegiline HCl Crude 1.87
Crude Selegeline ML(recycle)
HCl preparation IPA/HCl 1.56 Acetone recovered 10.15
Acetone Loss 0.78
14.05 14.05
Stage – V
Stage Name Inputs Kgs Outputs Kgs
Selegiline HCl 1.25 Selegiline HCl 1.00
Crude
Selegeline HCl Acetone 8.75 Acetone recovered 8.12
preparation IPA 3.12 Acetone Loss 0.63
Activated carbon 0.13 Selegilline HCl 3.50
ML(recycle)
13.25 13.25
Stage 1
Mono-chloro benzene & Benzoyl peroxide is treated with p-Toluic acid and
pass the chlorine gas in to the mixture. Then water distilled out and cools to
get 4-(chloromethyl) benzoic acid
Stage 2
Stage 3
p-(aminomethyl) benzoic acid [PAMBA] is dissolved in Dilute Sulphuric acid
then Hydrogenation done by using Platinum oxide catalyst. Then reaction
65 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
mass treated with sodium hydroxide and water washings. Distilled out the
water and precipitated in Acetone. Cool and get Tranexamic acid cis/trans
mixture.
Stage 4
Tranexamic acid cis/trans mixture is dissolved in Dilute Sulphuric acid
then Hydrogenation done by using Platinum oxide catalyst. Then reaction
mass treated with barium sulphate and water washings. Distilled out the
water and precipitated in Acetone. Cool and get Tranexamic acid Crude.
Stage 5
Tranexamic acid crude is dissolved in DM water then Activated carbon
treated to improve the colour. Then it is precipitated in Acetone solvent after
water removal. Cool and get Tranexamic acid.
66 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
67 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
Material Balance
Stage I: Preparation of 4-(chloromethyl)benzoic acid
In put Out put
Qty Qty
S.N Name of the S.N Los Tota
in Description in
o raw material o s l
Kg Kg
1 P-Toluic acid 300 1 4-(chloromethyl) 330 - 330
benzoic acid (Stage-
I)
2 Chlorine gas 450 2 Un-reacted Chlorine - 294 294
gas ( Scrubbed by
alkali water )
3 Benzoyl 4 3 HCl gas ( Scrubbed 80 80
peroxide by alkali water )
4 Chlorobenzen 1554 4 Chloro benzene 1476 78 1554
e
5 DM water 500 5 Water washings 360 145 505
6 Residue 45 45
Total 280 Total 221 597 280
8 1 8
68 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
69 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
The raw materials required for the production in each stage & mode of
transportation of the raw materials is given in Annexure - II
The total water requirement of the existing plant is about 210 KLD
and it will be increased to 270 KLD after the proposed change of product.
The total water requirement of the plant will be sourced from SIPCOT water
supply scheme. M/s. MDPL already have a permission letter from SIPCOT
for supplying water. The copy of the supply of water is enclosed in
Annexure III. The water balance diagram showing source, water
requirement and waste water generation & usage of treated water during
70 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
existing and proposed process is shown in Figure 3.4 and Figure 3.5
respectively.
71 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
140
COOLING
TOWER
40
78
BOILER PROCESS
0.4
30 Vapor loss
1.5 Blow down
Condensate - 14 (water) in vacuum
44
4.5
10 9.5
210 KLD PROCESS / EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT
UTILITY 11 0.6 T
Effluent (Salt)
5 3.9
DOMESTIC SEWAGE TREATMENT GARDENING
PLANT 10 KLD
15
COMMUNITY
SUPPLY
72 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
73 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
3.9 Quantity of waste generation (Liquid and Solid) & its management
In the process along with the products, different waste materials will
also be generated. These waste materials mainly include dust emissions and
solid wastes from the utilities.
The major air pollution sources from the industry are DG set and
boiler apart from the process sections. These sources are provided with
stacks of adequate height so as to disperse the emanating flue gases
containing SPM, oxides of sulfur and nitrogen without affecting the ground
level concentrations are proposed to the process section with adequate stack
height as per the regulatory requirements.
The main sources of effluent are process washings, boiler blow down,
cooling tower blow down and water treatment plant regeneration. The
effluent generated will be treated in the existing ETP. The details of Effluent
treatment Plant is given in Annexure V
The major source of noise pollution in the industry is the DG set for
which acoustic enclosure is proposed. Also ambient noise levels will be
74 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
75 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
one DG set of 750 KVA (proposed) will be used as back-up power supply.
Details of DG set are given in Table 3.4
Table 3.4 Details of DG Set
S.No DG set Details Existing Proposed
1 Capacity 500+500KVA 750 KVA
2 Type of Fuel Diesel Diesel
3 MOC of the stack M.S M.S
4 Diameter of the stack 150 mm 150 mm
5 Height of the stack 3M 3M
6 Fuel consumption 3.15 L/unit 3.15 L/unit
76 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
4. SITE ANALYSIS
The proposed activity will be carried out within the existing production
facility at Plot No.7B & 7C, SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Ranipet – 632 403,
Vellore district, Tamil Nadu.
4.1 Connectivity
The project site is well connected with other parts of country through
Road, Rail and Air. The nearest highway of the project site is NH-40 (NW)
that connects Kurnool - Ranipet and also well connected to SH 124 A (N)
connecting Ranipet to Ponnai road.
77 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
The proposed activity will be carried out within the existing production
facility at plot no.7B & 7C, SIPCOT Industrial Complex, Ranipet – 632 403,
Vellore district, Tamil Nadu. The land use classification of the project site is
Industrial use. The entire land area belongs to the company and land
ownership documents are enclosed as Annexure I.
4.3 Topography
The site is located within the SIPCOT industrial complex, Ranipet. List of
some major industries are listed below.
Ultramarine & pigments limited
Om Sakthi Chemicals
Pallava Chemicals P Ltd
Ramnath Chemicals p Ltd
S.R.S Leathers
Kausik Chemicals Ltd,
Kaushik Leather Pvt Ltd
Balaji Oil Industries Pvt Ltd
Murali Krishna Engg Works
Pneumatic Atomising Mills Pvt Ltd,
78 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
79 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
80 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
5.5 Amenities/Facilities
81 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
6. PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE
The land available and earmarked for the proposed expansion project is
categorized as Industrial use. The total land available under the ownership
of the promoter is 2.98 hectares. The proposed activities will be carried out
within the above area which is sufficient for the planned activities. The site
will be facilitated only for the manufacturing of various synthetic chemicals
for the application in the pharmaceutical Industry.
The factory has a total of 0.2147 hectares as green belt out of a total area of
2.98 ha. To achieve the mandatory requirement of 33% of green belt
requirement by CPCB / MoEF green belt area of 10027 Sq.m or 1.0027
hectares is given outside the premises in company land. The survey No of
land is 263, 264, & 265. Survey was conducted to obtain the knowledge on
existing flora within the factory premises. Adequate no of trees, bushes,
shrubs will be planted based on the site conditions. The green belt layout
has been enclosed in Annexure VI
82 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
hospitals water supply, etc. is available in the region to manage the current
expansion proposal.
6.5 Connectivity
The project site is well connected with other parts of country through
Road, Rail and Air. The nearest highway of the project site is NH-40 (NW)
that connects Kurnool - Ranipet and also well connected to SH 124 A (N)
connecting Ranipet to Ponnai road.
83 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
6.11 Rain Water Harvesting System & Storm water management system
84 FEBRUARY 2017
PRE FEASIBILITY REPORT
The increase in the product capacity will be carried out within the existing
plant of Malladi Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Unit 3. No home outstees /land
outstees are expected & hence no rehabilitation plan is envisaged.
85 FEBRUARY 2017