Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
electron
loniratlon
(CH& -N-C-0-CH, -CCl,
N,Kdtmathyl-2,2,2-trlchloroethylcarbsmate
electron
Ionization 0+
(CH,),-N -O-@H,
o+
N,N-dimethyl-ptOluen0 sultonamlde
ii
(CH,),-N-C (m/z 72) (m/z 199)
FIG. 1. Derivatization of TMA and DMA. DMA and TMA were derivatized so as to form N,N-dimethyl-p-toluene sulfonamide and N,N-
dimethyl-2,2,2-trichloroethyl carbamate. These were isolated using gas chromatography and fragmented using electron impact ionization.
methyl[‘HG]amine HCl (DMA-ds, 98 at.% D, Aldrich Control samples of urine (24-h collections) and blood
Chemical Co., Milwaukee, WI), dimethyl[13C,]amine were collected from humans eating a normal diet. Five
HCl ([13C]DMA, 99.2 at.% 13C, MSD Isotopes, Mon- normal humans (male, ages 24-36 years) were also given
treal, Canada), trimethyl[2HG]amine HCl {TMA-ds, an oral dose of [13C]DMA (0.5 hmol/kg body wt), and
(CD,H),N; 99 at.% D, MSD Isotopes}, and TMAO-dG urine was collected at timed intervals after the dose.
(prepared from TMA-d, with hydrogen peroxide (30)) Urine was collected and stored as described above for rat
were made up in 0.1 N HCl and stored at 4°C. These urine.
solutions were stable over several months. The derivati- Fresh fish was purchased locally and analyzed that
zation agents, p-toluenesulfonyl chloride (2 M solution day. A sample was also stored at -20°C for several
diluted in toluene) and 2,2,2-trichloroethyl chlorofor- months before analysis.
mate, were purchased from Aldrich Chemical. Metha- Sample preparation and extraction of amines. Deu-
nolic alkali was prepared by dissolving 2.8 g KOH in 100 terated internal standards (DMA-ds, TMA-d,, TMAO-
ml methanol/water (3/l, v/v). The reducing reagent was $; as appropriate) were added to all samples to be
prepared with titanium(II1) chloride (Aldrich), 1 N HCl, analyzed. Before urine samples were assayed, they were
and 10% formalin (l/1/2, v/v; must be prepared fresh filtered with a Sep Pak (Waters Associates, Milford,
under a nitrogen atmosphere). MA; 92-94% of DMA, TMA, or TMAO were recovered).
Experimental. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (300-400 Tissue samples were sonicated (setting 5, 50% pulse;
g, Charles River Breeders, Wilmington, MA) were Heat Systems Ultrasonics, Inc., Model W-225R, Plain-
housed in individual metabolic cages in a controlled en- view, NY) in ice-cold 0.9% NaCl (l/5, w/v). An aliquot
vironment (24”C, 12 h of light from 6 AM to 6 PM). They of sonicate containing 100 mg tissue was added to 0.6 ml
were offered food (Ralston Purina rat chow No. 5001, 0.1 N HCl and 3 ml chloroform to precipitate protein.
Farmers Exchange, Framingham, MA) and water ad Zibi- Aliquots of whole blood (1 ml) were added to 0.6 ml 0.1
turn. Urine was collected, over a 24-h period, into acid N HCl and 3 ml chloroform to precipitate protein. Fish
(so that the final concentration was approximately 0.1 (500 mg) was added to 5 ml 0.1 N HCl and mixed thor-
N HCl). The volumes were recorded, and aliquots were oughly (sonication was not required due to the soft con-
stored at -20°C. After urine collection was completed, sistency of fish). Samples were mixed and then subjected
the rats were anesthetized with diethyl ether, and blood to centrifugation at 2000g for 20 min at 4°C. The super-
was drawn by intracardiac puncture. Blood samples natants were aspirated and used for analyses.
were collected into tubes containing heparin and kept on Derivatization and analysis of DMA, TMA, and
ice. Liver and kidney samples were collected by freeze- TMAO (see Fig. 1). For DMA analysis, N,N-dimethyl-
clamping the specimen between tongs that had been pre- p-toluene sulfonamide was formed (10). A portion of the
cooled in liquid nitrogen. They were stored at -95°C un- acidified biological fluid or extract was placed into a glass
til used. test tube sealed with a Teflon-lined septum (WISP sep-
236 DACOSTA, VRBANAC, AND ZEISEL
TABLE 2
nmol/g wet wt
Rat blood 4 40 92
Theoretical pmoles Rat liver 136 437 633
Rat kidney 161 531 0
FIG. 3. Linearity of assays for DMA, TMA, and TMAO. Authentic 4 40 21
Human blood
standards of DMA, TMA, and TMAO were derivatized and quanti-
tated using GC/MS as described under Materials and Methods. Corre-
rmol/kg body wt/24 h
lation coefficients were calculated using linear regression analysis and
were equal to 0.9960 for all three compounds. Rat urine 27 2 14
Human urine 6 1 10
TMA (nmol/ml)
fimol/lOO g wet wt
- { DM&,, x area(DMA) * ml/nmol}
= are%rbamate) 9 Shrimp 10 9 171
area(TMA) * ml/nmd Tuna (canned) 84 247 57
Cod 97 44 3400
where Cod (frozen) 381 218 1958
arqcarbamate)= area at mass 72 Note. DMA, TMA, and TMAO were measured as described in text.
DMAtos = concentration (nmol/ml) of DMA in sample Data are expressed as means of triplicate determinations.
as determined using the toluenesulfonyl chloride
method
area(DMA) = area generated by 1 nmol/ml internal
(Fig. 3). Coefficients of variation for intrasample repro-
standard of isotopically labeled DMA that was con- ducibility were 1.26, 1.96, and 1.26% for DMA, TMA,
verted to the carbamate derivative
and TMAO, respectively. Coefficients of variation for in-
=alTMA) = area generated by 1 nmol/ml internal tersample reproducibility were 3.30, 1.31, and 1.78% for
standard of isotopically labeled TMA that was converted
DMA, TMA, and TMAO, respectively. When authentic
to the carbamate derivative. standards of DMA, TMA, and TMAO were added to
TMAO concentrations were calculated as the differ- samples of urine, blood, and rat liver, recoveries of 93-
ences in TMA content after and before reduction. 103% were observed (Table 1).
The peak contours from derivatized DMA, TMA, and
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION TMAO exhibited modest tailing and no ghosting (Fig. 2;
The assays as described were able to detect as little as common problems in other gas chromatography assays
1 pmol of each amine and remained linear up to 250 pmol
TABLE 1
Percentage recovery
for these amines). Once the derivatives were formed, after the dose, and most of the isotopic label was ex-
they were stable at room temperature or at -20°C for 2 creted in urine over a 48-h period.
weeks. Ninety-nine percent of the DMA was converted In summary we have developed a GC/MS assay for
to the tosylamide, and 95% of the TMA was converted DMA, TMA, and TMAO which is sensitive, specific, and
to NJ-dimethyl-2,2,2-trichloroethyl carbamate. The reproducible. Because we used mass spectrometry, isoto-
reducing reagent used in TMAO analyses did not alter pically labeled internal standards could be used to cor-
the efficiency of conversion of TMA to the carbamate rect for losses during extraction, derivatization, and gas
derivative. chromatography. In addition, the assay is suitable for
Betaine, ethylamine, phosphatidylcholine, and am- metabolic studies in humans using isotopically labeled
monia did not interfere with the assay. However, at con- methylamines.
centrations 10 times higher than those of the amines of
interest, betaine aldehyde, phosphocholine, and choline ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
formed some dimethyltrichloroethyl carbamate (co.1 %
We thank Drs. John Otis and Daniel R. Knapp for their advice. This
conversion), while 0.5% of carnitine was converted. work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health
Dimethylglycine was the only compound that formed (CA26731, RR-00533).
some N,N-dimethyl-p-toluene sulfonamide (~0.2% con-
verted). Choline, which is also present in biological fluids REFERENCES
and tissues, will break down to form TMA when heated
above 110°C. Therefore, it is important that this temper- 1. Zeisel, S. H., daCosta, K., and LaMont, J. T. (1988) Carcinogenesis
9,179-181.
ature limit is not exceeded during derivatization.
2. Lijinsky, W., Keefer, L., Conrad, E., and Van de Bogart, R. (1972)
DMA, TMA, and TMAO concentrations were mea- J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 49,1239-1249.
sured in human urine and blood and in rat urine, blood, 3. Lijinsky, W., and Taylor, H. W. (1977) Food Cosmet. Z’onicol. 15,
liver, and kidney (Table 2). Our values for DMA, TMA, 269-274.
and TMAO in human and in rat urine were consistent 4. Ohshima, H., and Kawabata, T. (1978) ZARC Sci. Publ. 19,143-
with those published in the literature (7,11,18,33-35). 153.
Some of the tissues analyzed had not been previously 5. Bartsch, H., and Montesano, R. (1984) Curcinogenesis 5, 1381-
examined for methylamines or TMAO. Our DMA values 1398.
were lower than those which we and others have pre- 6. Zeisel, S. H., dacosta, K., and Fox, J. G. (1985) Biochem. J. 232,
403-408.
viously reported in blood (6,36), and our TMA values
7. Al-Waiz, M., Mitchell, S. C., Idle, J. R., and Smith, R. L. (1987)
were higher (1). We believe these differences reflect im-
Toxicology 43,117-121.
proved calculation of recovery with our method. We
8. Asatoor, A. M., and Simenhoff, M. L. (1965) Biochim. Biophys.
compared an existing gas chromatography method (6) Acta 111,384-392.
which uses a packed column and FID detection with the 9. Al-Waiz, M., Mitchell, S. C., Idle, J. R., and Smith, R. L. (1987)
GC/MS method. The two methods gave comparable re- Xenobiotica 17,551-558.
sults for DMA and TMA, but the packed column method 10. Singer, G. M., and Lijinsky, W. (1976) J. Agric. Food Chem. 24,
was much more variable for TMAO determinations 550-553.
(data not shown). This occurred because, in the GC-FID 11. Zeisel, S. H., and dacosta, K. (1986) Cancer Res. 46, 6136-
method, there was a variable loss of internal standard 6138.
(isopropylamine) during the reduction of TMAO. In the 12. Lundstrom, R. C., and Racicot, L. D. (1983) J. Assoc. Off Anal.
Chem. 66,1158-1163.
GC/MS method we used TMAO-dG as an internal stan-
13. Lin, J-K., and Lai, C-C. (1980) Anal. Chem. 52,630-635.
dard. Seafoods are a rich source of dietary amines, and
14. Lundstrom, R. C., Correia, F. F., and Wilhelm, K. A. (1982) J.
we analyzed several species for their DMA, TMA, and
Food Biochem. 6,229-241.
TMAO contents (Table 2). We found that the DMA and
15. Churacek, J., Pechova, H., Tocksteinova, D., andzikova, Z. (1972)
TMA concentrations in fresh fish were two to three J. Chromatogr. 72,145-152.
times lower than those present in processed (canned) or 16. Bagnasco, S. (1985) Anal. Biochem. 149,572-574.
frozen fish. As would be expected, fresh fish had higher
17. Bouyoucos, S. A. (1977) Anal. Chem. 49,401-403.
concentrations of TMAO than did canned or frozen fish.
18. Blau, K. (1961) Biochem. J. 80,193-200.
Our methods for measuring DMA, TMA, and TMAO
19. Dyer, W. J. (1945) J. Fish Res. Board Canad 6,351-358.
are suitable for studying the metabolism of these amines
20. Miller, A., III, Scanlan, R. A., Lee, J. S., and Libbey, L. M. (1972)
in humans because we can use a nonradioactive isotopic J. Agric. Food Chem. 20,709-711.
label. In a pilot experiment, in which five humans in- 21. Brewster, M. A., and Schedewie, H. (1983) Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 13,
gested [13C]DMA, we observed that DMA was rapidly 20-24.
absorbed from the intestine and excreted into urine (Fig. 22. Lowis, S., Eastwood, M. A., and Brydon, W. G. (1983) J. Chroma-
4). Peak enrichment of urine was observed within 30 min togr. 278,139-143.
CHROMATOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT OF METHYLAMINES 239
23. Dalene, M., Mathiasson, L., and Jonsson, J. A. (1981) J. Chroma- 30. Hickinbottom, W. J. (1957) Reactions of Organic Compounds, p.
togr. 207,37-46. 420, Longmans, Green, New York.
24. Brand, J. M., and Galask, R. P. (1986) Obstet. Gynecol. 68, 682- 31. Hartvig, P., Ahnfelt, N. O., and Karlsson, K. E. (1976) Acta
685. Pharm. Suet. 13,181-189.
25. Dunn, S. R., Simenhoff, M. L., and Wesson, L. G., Jr. (1976) Anal. 32. Cohen, J., Krupp, M., and Chidsey, C. (1958) Amer. J. Physiol.
Chem. 48,41-44. 194,229-235.
33. Al-Waiz, M., Ayesh, R., Mitchell, S. C., Idle, J. R., and Smith,
26. Zeisel, S. H., daCosta, K., Edrise, B. M., and Fox, J. G. (1986)
R. L. (1987) Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 42,608-612.
Carcinogenesis 7, 775-778.
34. Lowis, S., Eastwood, M. A., and Brydon, W. G. (1985) &it. J.
27. DiCorcia, A., and Samperi, R. (1974) Anal. Chem. 46,977-981. Nutr. 54,43-51.
28. Elskamp, C. J., and Schultz, G. R. (1986) Amer. Znd. Hyg. Assoc. 35. Zeisel, S. H., Gettner, S., and Youssef, M. (1989) Food Chem. Toni-
J. 47,41-49. col. 27,31-34.
29. Baba, S., and Watanabe, Y. (1988) Anal. Biochem. 175, 252- 36. Ishiwata, H., Iwata, R., and Tanimura, A. (1984) Food Chem. Tox-
257. icol. 22.649-653.