Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

For the Rating Period : JANUARY- JUNE 2015

EMPLOYEE: B
MARIZA S. LLAVORE OFFICE/DIVISION : OFFICE OF THE BOARD

POSITION : TDO II UNIT : DOCKET SECTION

PART I. PERFORMANCE
Weight TARGETS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS RATINGS
Allocation Work/Activity Unit of Measure/Indicator QUANTITY QUALITY TIME SUPERVISOR EMPLOYEE
(100%) Target Accomp. Target Accomp. Target Accomp. QN QL T APS EPS QN QL T APS EPS
Review of:
70% Recording of entry to the Docket No. of cases per 30/day 45/day with 2 no 8 hrs 4 hrs 10 10 10 10.00 7.00 8 10 10 9.33 6.53
book franchise revision revision

10% Indorsed cases with findings to office No. of cases with no no 15 min./ 5min./ 8 10 8 8.66 0.86 10 10 10 10.00 1.00
concerned findings - 2 revision revision case case

10% Inspection of purchases pertaining to No. of goods, office between no no w/in 4 w/in 2
8 8 8 8.00 0.80 - 8 10 9.00 0.90
office supplies, materials etc. supplies, materials etc. - 5-1000 error error hrs. hrs

10% Monitor the in-coming/ out-going of cases No. Of total cases 100 no error no error 8 hrs 6 hrs 8 10 8 8.66 0.86 8 8 8 8.00 0.80
(case folders) cases

Total Equivalent Point Score 9.52 9.23


Multiply by Percentage Weight Allocation (70%) 50% 20%
Weighted Average Score (WAS) 4.76 1.85
WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON THE ABOVE TARGETS: Legend: QN - Quantity QL - Quality PERC Action :
T - Time APS -
ATTY. ROBERTO P. CABRERA, III MARIZA S. LLAVORE Average Point Score
Executive Director EPS - Equivalent Point Score
RATEE
RATER
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

PART II - CRITICAL FACTORS (30%) PART IV - SUMMARY OF RATING


WEIGHT SUPERVISOR EMPLOYEE WEIGHT WEIGHTED OVERALL
ALLOCATION CRITICAL FACTORS (10%) (5%) RATER ALLOCATION SCORE WEIGHTED
(100%) Rating EPS Rating EPS Part I Part II (WS) SCORE
RANK & FILE EMP. 70% 30% Part I Part II
30% PUNCTUALITY AND ATTENDANCE 10 3 8 2.4 Supervisor 50% 10% 4.76 1.00 5.76
(Comes to the Office on time and present at work Employee 20% 5% 1.85 0.47 2.32
to attend to clients/complete assigned) Subordinate 0%
30% COURTESY 10 3 10 3 Peer 5% 0.50 0.50
(Shows politeness, kindness and thoughtful be- Clients 5% 0.50 0.50
haviour towards the public/clientele in manner of Total Overall Weighted Score 9.08
speech and actions) Rating on Intervening Tasks
25% INITIATIVE 10 2.5 10 2.5 Total Numerical Rating 8
(Starts action, projects and performs assigned Equivalent Adjectival Rating VS
tasks without being told and under minimal super-
vision) COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION
15% STRESS TOLERANCE 10 1.5 10 1.5
(Display stability of performance under pressure
or opposition)
OTHERS ________________________
________________________
(Maximum of two factors as identified by the office)

The above rating has been discussed and agreed by:

RATEE MARIZA S. LLAVORE Date January 25, 2015

TOTAL EPS 10.00 9.40 RATER Atty. ROBERTO P. CABRERA, III Date January 25, 2015
Multiply by Supervisor (10%) Employee (5%) percentage 10.00% 5.00% Executive Director
weight allocation
Weighted Score (WS) 1.00 0.47 VALIDATED BY:
PART III - EPS INTERVENING TASKS
Work Activity in Performance Standards Rating Date _______________
terms of outputs Chairman
PERC ACTION ON RATINGS:
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM
For the Rating Period : JULY-DECEMBER 2015

EMPLOYEE: BMARIZA S. LLAVORE OFFICE/DIVISION : OFFICE OF THE BOARD

POSITION : ATDO II UNIT : DOCKET SECTION

PART I. PERFORMANCE
Weight TARGETS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS RATINGS
Allocation Work/Activity Unit of Measure/Indicator QUANTITY QUALITY TIME SUPERVISOR EMPLOYEE
(100%) Target Accomp. Target Accomp. Target Accomp. QN QL T APS EPS QN QL T APS EPS
Review of:
70% Recording of entry to the Docket No. of cases per 30/day 45/day with 2 no 8 hrs 4 hrs 10 10 10 10.00 7.00 8 10 10 9.33 6.53
book franchise revision revision

10% Indorsed cases with findings to office No. of cases with no no 15 min./ 5min./ 8 10 8 8.66 0.86 10 10 10 10.00 1.00
concerned findings - 2 revision revision case case

10% Inspection of purchases pertaining to No. of goods, office between no no w/in 4 w/in 2
office supplies, materials etc. supplies, materials etc. - 5-1000 error error hrs. hrs 8 8 8 8.00 0.80 - 8 10 9.00 0.90

10% Monitor the in-coming/ out-going of No. Of total cases 100


cases (case folders) cases no error no error 8 hrs 6 hrs 8 10 8 8.66 0.86 8 8 8.00 0.80

Total Equivalent Point Score 9.52 9.23


Multiply by Percentage Weight Allocation (70%) 50% 20%
Weighted Average Score (WAS) 4.76 1.85
WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON THE ABOVE TARGETS: Legend QN - Quantity QL - Quality PERC Action :
T - Time APS -
ATTY. ROBERTO P. CABRERA, III MARIZA S. LLAVORE Average Point Score EPS
Executive Director - Equivalent Point Score
RATER RATEE
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

PART II - CRITICAL FACTORS (30%) PART IV - SUMMARY OF RATING


WEIGHT SUPERVISOR EMPLOYEE WEIGHT WEIGHTED OVERALL
ALLOCATION CRITICAL FACTORS (10%) (5%) RATER ALLOCATION SCORE WEIGHTED
(100%) Rating EPS Rating EPS Part I Part II (WS) SCORE
RANK & FILE EMP. 70% 30% Part I Part II
30% PUNCTUALITY AND ATTENDANCE 10 3 8 2.4 Supervisor 50% 10% 4.66 1.00 5.66
(Comes to the Office on time and present at work Employee 20% 5% 1.85 0.47 2.32
to attend to clients/complete assigned) Subordinate 0%
30% COURTESY 10 3 10 3 Peer 5% 0.50 0.50
(Shows politeness, kindness and thoughtful be- Clients 5% 0.50 0.50
haviour towards the public/clientele in manner of Total Overall Weighted Score 9.11
speech and actions) Rating on Intervening Tasks
25% INITIATIVE 10 2.5 10 2.5 Total Numerical Rating 8
(Starts action, projects and performs assigned Equivalent Adjectival Rating VS
tasks without being told and under minimal super-
vision) COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATION
15% STRESS TOLERANCE 10 1.5 10 1.5
(Display stability of performance under pressure
or opposition)
OTHERS ________________________
________________________
(Maximum of two factors as identified by the office)

The above rating has been discussed and agreed by:

RATEE Mariza S. Llavore Date JANUARY 25,2015

TOTAL EPS 10.00 9.40 RATER Atty. ROBERTO P. CABRERA, III Date JANUARY 25,2015
Multiply by Supervisor (10%) Employee (5%) percentage 10.00% 5.00% Executive Director
weight allocation
Weighted Score (WS) 1.00 0.47 VALIDATED BY:
PART III - EPS INTERVENING TASKS
Work Activity in Performance Standards Rating Date _______________
terms of outputs Chairman
PERC ACTION ON RATINGS:

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen