4/10/2018 Eric Bettinger: Why Stay-at-Home Parents are Good for Older Children | Stanford Graduate School of Business

Career & Success

Eric Bettinger: Why Stay-at-Home Parents are Good for

Older Children
Parental presence isn’t just for infants and toddlers.
October 20, 2014 | by Edmund L. Andrews

 3  348  587 

A new study suggests parents who stay home with their children can positively impact their success in
school. | Reuters/Nacho Doce

It may be the most hotly disputed and emotionally loaded question that American
parents face: Are children better off if a parent stays at home?

The evidence is already quite strong that staying at home during a child’s first year of life can have
long-term benefits. That’s why most industrial nations (though not the United States) guarantee at
least some paid parental leave for working mothers and fathers.

What’s been less clear is whether stay-at-home parenting also benefits older children who may
already be in elementary or even middle school. On the one hand, the additional income from a
second salary is crucial for many families. On the other hand, it is hard to match the attention and
guidance that an involved parent can provide.

It’s an issue for fathers and mothers alike, but women account for the overwhelming majority  of
parents who give up outside jobs to care for their children. The ranks of those women have shrunk
dramatically. In the United States, about 70% of mothers with young children now have jobs
outside the home — up from 10% in 1940.

But a new study , drawing on extensive data from Norway, found potentially dramatic benefits
for older children when their parents had more opportunity to stay at home. Indeed, the benefits
may be even greater for children in the United States than they were for children in Norway.

https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/eric-bettinger-why-stay-home-parents-are-good-older-children 1/4
The study comes from Eric Bettinger,
4/10/2018 associate professor
Eric Bettinger: at StanfordParents
Why Stay-at-Home Graduate
areSchool of Older Children | Stanford Graduate School of Business
Good for
Education with a courtesy appointment at Stanford Graduate School of Business, and two
Norwegian scholars. The researchers examined the impact of Norway’s “Cash for Care” program,
which offers a generous cash payment to stay-at-home parents with children below the age of 3.

Norway's Program
By way of background, Norway has long had excellent publicly subsidized daycare. Working
parents are also entitled to 42 weeks of fully paid parental leave. About 84% of Norwegian
mothers have outside jobs.

But in 1998, the government launched “Cash for Care” as an alternative cash subsidy to parents
who wanted to care for infants and toddlers at home. Parents who accepted “Cash for Care” were
still allowed to hold jobs, but they couldn’t use the publicly subsidized daycare.

Bettinger and his colleagues — Mari Rege at the University of Stavanger and Torbjørn Hægeland
at Statistics Norway — didn’t focus on how Cash for Care affected infants and toddlers. Instead,
they looked at what happened to older siblings who became indirect beneficiaries.

In what social scientists call a “natural experiment,” the researchers looked for differences in
school performance between older children who became these side-beneficiaries and older
children who did not.

At the time Cash for Care began in 1998, the extent to which older children became beneficiaries
depended on how close their youngest sisters and brothers were to the age of 3. If a younger
sibling was 1 in 1998, the older child was a side-beneficiary for two years. If the younger child
was 2 in 1998, the older child got the benefit for just one year. That allowed the researchers to
look for correlations between improvements in school performance and the number of years that
an older child’s parent stayed at home.

The researchers analyzed the school performance of some 68,000 children with younger siblings
who had been born shortly before or after the Cash for Care program began.

The researchers found that only about 5% of parents actually changed their work choices in
response to the new payments. Parents in higher-income families, who could more easily afford to
give up one parent’s salary, were the most likely to leave the work force. Lower-income parents,
by contrast, tended to keep working even if they collected the cash payments. Many relied on
informal child care from relatives or friends.

Nevertheless, the older children in families that did qualify for the payments tended to do better in
school. On average, the older siblings in those families increased their grade-point averages in
10th grade by .02 points on Norway’s grading scale of 1 to 6 points. The increases seemed
strongest among children around the age of 6 and 7 at their sibling’s birth.

The bump in grades may sound like a

“What we’re finding is that parents very modest increase, but it is too big
continue to be important much to write off as statistical noise,
Bettinger says. In addition, the
further along in a child’s life than improvement is potentially much
more dramatic than it seems. That’s
we had previously thought.” because only 5% of parents actually
— Eric Bettinger changed their decision about work in
response to the new subsidy. If those
few parents were responsible for the overall jump in school performance — and the researchers
think they were — it means that the individual parents had an outsized impact on their own
children.

“The results suggest that even older students in middle or elementary school could use guidance
from their parents,” Bettinger says. “For years, we have known that parental presence is
extraordinarily important in the very early childhood years. What we’re finding is that parents
continue to be important much further along in a child’s life than we had previously thought.”

Impact in the U.S.?

Bettinger suspects the benefits could actually be even bigger for American children. That’s
because Norway already offers excellent and affordable childcare, better than what is available to
most American families. As a result, the added benefit of having a parent stay at home is probably
smaller in Norway than it would be in the United States.
https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/eric-bettinger-why-stay-home-parents-are-good-older-children 2/4
But Bettinger cautions that the benefits
4/10/2018 may be Why
Eric Bettinger: limited to relatively Parents
Stay-at-Home affluent are
families.
GoodInforNorway,
Older Children | Stanford Graduate School of Business
parents at the bottom of the income ladder tended to keep working even if they collected the cash
payments. If children in low-income families are simply left under informal supervision, or simply
left to watch TV, they may not be any better off than they were before.

“It could be that the benefits of a parent staying at home are mostly in middle-class and affluent
families,” Bettinger cautions. “That’s still a good thing, but the impact on low-income families may
not be there. While clearly parental involvement matters, policies which attempt to improve
parental involvement may not actually help the families in the greatest need.”

Other things being equal, however, the results from Norway suggest that it is hard to substitute for
the care and attention of a parent at home.

Economics, Career & Success, Government

 3  0  587 

Share this http://stanford.io/1wQvomP

 Sign up for more insights and ideas.

email address GO

For media inquiries, visit the Newsroom.

Explore More

Hit the Mark: Make Complex Ideas Understandable

6 ways to communicate challenging concepts to an audience.

Bringing Mindfulness to Your Career

In her new book, “How We Work,” Stanford GSB lecturer Leah Weiss explores how to transform your on-the-job experience.

Feeling Guilty? That Could Be a Good Thing

When it comes to work attendance, “guilt proneness” may be a bigger factor than job satisfaction.

 Editor's Picks

 Related

About Follow Contact

Accounting Economics Finance

Big Data Education Government

Career & Success Energy & Environment Health Care

Corporate Governance Entrepreneurship Innovation

https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/eric-bettinger-why-stay-home-parents-are-good-older-children 3/4
Leadership
4/10/2018 Nonprofit Parents are Good for Older Children | Stanford
Eric Bettinger: Why Stay-at-Home Political Economy
Graduate School of Business

Management Operations, Information & Technology Social Impact

Marketing Organizational Behavior Supply Chain

https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/eric-bettinger-why-stay-home-parents-are-good-older-children 4/4