Agre P 1999 Information Technology in Higher Education: the 'Global Academic Village'

and Intellectual Standardization, On the Horizon 7 (5)

Agre P 2000 Infrastructure and Institutional Change in the Networked University,
Information, Communication and Society
Anita Pincas 1999 Management issues for online courses, Active Learning 9: 41-45
Armitage, S.and Steeples, C. 1996 Guidelines for using Computer Conferencing in
Teaching BT CMC in HE Newsletter Issue 4
Association of Canadian Community Colleges 1997 Mobilizing for the Future:
Educational Technology in Canada's Community Colleges and Technical Institutes:
Bahnot, B. & Fallows, S. 2002 ICT: a threat to the traditional university? In Fallows, S. &
Bhanot, S. (Eds), Educational Development through Information and Communications
Technology, 201-213. London: Kogan Page.
Bailey P, Jenkins A, Oliver M, Maier P and Young C 1998 ALTering EFFECTS:
Rewarding teaching using C&IT, Active

 Hodges, L. (2010). Engaging students, assessing learning: Just a click

away. Essays on Teaching Excellence, 21(3).
 Thalheimer, W. (2009). Questioning strategies for audience response systems:
How to use questions to maximize learning, engagement, and satisfaction.
Accessed March 5, 2009.
 University of Colorado Science Education Initiative & University of British
Columbia Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative. (2008). Clicker resource
guide: An instructors guide to the effective use of personal response systems
(clickers) in teaching. Retrieved April 11, 2008.
 Zhu, E. (2007). Teaching with clickers. Center for Research on Learning and
Teaching Occasional Papers, 22.
 aldwell, J.E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-
practice tips. Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 9-20.
 De Gagne, J. (2011). The impact of clickers in nursing education: A review of
literature. Nurse Education Today, 31(8).
 Fies, C., & Marshall, J. (2006). Classroom response systems: A review of the
literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 101-109.
 Judson, E., & Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from past and present: Electronic
response systems in college lecture halls. Journal of Computers in Mathematics
and Science Teaching, 21(2), 167-181.
 Kay, R. H., & LeSage, A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using
audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education,
53, 819-827.
 Lantz, M. (2010). The use of clickers in the classroom: Teaching innovation or
merely an amusing novelty?Computers in Human Behavior, 26:4, 556-561.
 MacArthur, J. R., & Jones, L. L. (2008). A review of literature reports of clickers
applicable to college chemistry classrooms. Chemistry Education Research and
Practice, 9, 187-195.
 Roschelle, J., Penuel, W.R., & Abrahamson, L. (2004). Classroom response and
communication systems: Research review and theory. Paper presented at the
Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego,
CA.
 Simpson, V., & Oliver, M. (2002). Using electronic voting systems in lectures.
Retrieved June 11, 2007.
 Simpson, V., & Oliver, M. (2007). Electronic voting systems for lectures then and
now: A comparison of research and practice. Australasian Journal of Educational
Technology, 23(2), 187-208.
