Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
‘1"! ‘1' V \' ‘3‘ ‘I' ‘I‘ T ‘1' T T '1' ‘1' ‘1' ‘I' R" V ‘I'
‘.
‘ “Mu-a.
Rules 1 to 71
(Coarse Outline/Syllabus oI'Caaea)
PART I
Public Estates Authority vs. Yuyuico, 6.8. No. 140-486, February 6, 2001).
Bermejo vs. Barrios, 31 5684. 764, 776 [1971].
Unity Fishing Development Corp. vs. CA, 6.8. No. 145415, February 2, 2001.
Smith Bell Co., vs. CA, 267 SCRA 530 [1997]
Echegaray vs. Secretary of Justice, 6.8. No. 132601, January 19, 1999
PQPPP?’
General Principles
Bustos v. Lucero, 6.8. No. L-2086, March 8, 1949 Motion for Reconsideration
Resolution
Priscilla Alma Jose, Vs. Ramon C. Javeliana, Et AL, 6.8. No. 158239, January 25,
2012
Panay Railways inc., Vs. Heva Management And Development Corporation, Pamplona
Agra-industrial Corporation, And Spouses Candelaria Dayot And Edmundo Dayot, G. R.
No. 154061, January 25, 2012
Mca-be Countdown Cords Philippines lnc., Amabie ll. Guiluz V, Amobie C. Aguiluz ix,
Cielo C. Aguiiuz, Alberto L. Buenviaie, Vicente Acsay And Mca Holdings And
Management
Corporation, Vs. be Card international Limited And be Discount Card Limited, 6.8.
No.
173586, March 14, 2012
Douglas F. Anama Vs. Philippine Savings Bonlr, 6.8. No. 187021, January 25, 2012
Felix Martos, Jimmy Eciana, Rodel Pilones, et al. Vs. New San Jose Builders, inc.,
6.8. No.
192650. October 24, 2012
savor-I
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15. Maria Consolacion Rivera-Poscuoi, Vs. Spouses Marilyn Lim And George Lim And
The
Registry Of Deeds 0f Valenzuela City, 6.8. No. 191837, September 19, 2012
17. SM Land, inc. (Formerly Shoemart, inc.) and Watsons Personal Care Store,
Phiis., inc. Vs.
City of Manila, Liberty Toledo, in her official capacity as the City Treasurer of
Manila, et
oi. 6.8. No. 197151. October 22, 2012
18. Pinga v. Heirs ofSantiago, 6.8 No. 170354, June 30, 2006
19. Minerva A. Gomez-Castillo vs. COMELEC, 6.8. No. 187231, June 22, 2011
20. in the Matter fo the Petition for the issuance of a Writ of Amparo in Favor of
Carlos
lsagani T. Zarate Vs. Major General Reynaldo Mopagu, Commanding General of the
Philippine Army's 10th infantry Division, or al., 6.8. No. 189689/G.R. No.
189690/G.R.
No. 189691. November 13, 2012
24. De los Reyes v. People, 6.8. No. 138297, January 27, 2006
26. Phlvidec industrial Authority v. Cagayan Electric Power and Light Co., lnc.,
6.8. No.
127371, 25 April 2002
RULE 1
GENERAL PROVISONS
Manolo vs. CA, 6.8. No. 129242, January 16, 2001.
Sun insurance Office Ltd. Vs. Asuncion, 170 SCRA 274 [1989].
Ballatan vs. CA, 304 SCRA 34 [1997].
Ayala Land, inc. VS. Carpo, 6.8. No. 140162, November 22, 2000.
Sps. Go v. Tong, 6.8. No. 151942, 27 Nov 2003
RULE 2
CAUSE OF ACTION
Goodland Company, inc, vs. Asia United Bank, Abraham Co, Atty. Joel T. Pelicono And
The
Register Of Deeds Of Makati City, 6.8. No. 195561, March 14, 2012
Juana Complex l Homeowners Association, lnc., et al. vs. Ell-Estate Land, lnc.,
6.8. No. 152272,
March 5, 2012
Emergency Loan Pawnshop, inc. vs. CA, 6.8. No. 129184, February 28, 2001).
Multi-Realty Development Corp. v. Mahoti Tuscany Condominium Corp, 6.8. No. 146726,
June
16, 2006
\'\‘\
Y T Y T Y Y T Y ‘I'
RULE 3
PARTIES TO CIVIL ACTIONS
Sena vs. Mangubat, 6.8. No. L-44339, December 2, 1997, cited in Chua vs. Torres,
6.8. No.
151900, August 30, 2005.
Theodore And Nancy Aug, Represented 8y Flange Marvin 8. Canon, Vs. Spouses Alan And
Em
Aug. 6 8. No 186993, August 22. 2012
tlontero vs. CA. 105 SCRA 609; FIorendo. et. al. vs. Coloma, et. al. 129 SCRA 304.
Simny 6. Guy, Geraldine 6. Guy. Gladys 6. Yea, And The Heirs of the Late Grace 6.
Cheu Vs.
Gilbert 6. Guy. 6.8. No. 189486, September 05, 2012
Living 9 Sense. inc. Vs. Malayan insurance Company, inc. 6.8. No. 193753. September
26. 2012
Sepulveda, Sr. v. Pelaez, 6.8. No. 152195, 31 January 2005
V‘T“""R*\'\ "I!"
‘7 ‘7 T
\' \"
RULE 4
VENUE OF ACTIONS
Nocum and Philippine Daily lnquirer v. Tan, 6.8. No. 145022, September 23, 2005
Eastern Assurance 8‘: Surety Corp. v. Cui, 6.8. No. L-54452, July 20 1981
Phiitranco Service Enterprises, lnc., Vs. Felix Paras And inland Trailways, inc,
And Han. Court Of
Appeals. 6.8. No. 161909, April 25, 2012
1‘ ‘I' i” Y
R \ \'\"\'T\'\'
RULE S
UNIFORM PROCEDURE IN TRIAL COURTS
RULE 6
KINDS OF PLEADINGS
> Eastern Assurance 8c Surety Corp. v. Cui, 6.8. 054452, 20 July 1981].
p Pascuai v. Boutista, 33 SCRA 301, 1970;
RULE 7
PARTS OF A PLEADING
Felix Martos, Jimmy E clana, Rodei Piiones. et al. Vs. New San Jose Builders, inc,
6.8. No.
192650. October 24, 2012
Pascual and Santos, lnc. v. The Members of the Tramo Walrus Neighborhood
Association, inc,
6.8. No. 144880, November 17,200
Elsa D. Medado vs. Heirs of the Late Antonio Cansing, 6.8. No. 186720, February 8,
2012
Georgia T. Estel, vs. Recaredo P. Dieoo, Sr. and Recareda 8. Diego. in. 6.8. No.
174082. January
16, 2012
Vivian T. Ramirez Et. AL, vs. Mar Fishing Co., inc, Mirarnar Fishing Co., inc,
Robert Buehs And
Jerome Spitz, 6.8. Na. 168208.1une 13, 2012
‘ .
RULE 8
MANNER OF MAKING ALLEGATIONS IN PLEADINGS
BM. rem-re Associates Corporation vs. University Of Santa Tomas, 6.8. No. 189496,
February
1., 2012
"Y‘ Y
RULE 9
EFFECT OF FAILURE TO PLEAD
Financial Building Corp. v. Forbes Parit Association. 6.8. No. 133119, 17 August
2000
Natividad Lim Vs. National Power Corporation, Sps. Roberto Li. Arcinue and Arabeia
Arcinue,
6.8. No. 178789. November 14, 2012
Magdiwang Realty Corporation, Renato P. Dragon And Esperanza Tolentino Vs. The
Manila
Banking Corporation, Substituted By First Savereign Asset Management i5vamc), inc.,
6 .R. No.
195592, 5 Sep 2012
\\"\
RULE 10
AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADINGS
Philippine ports Authority v. William Gothong and Abaltlz, inc, 6.8. No. 158401, 28
January
2008
Surlgao Mine Exploration Co. v. Harris, 6.8. No. L-45543, May 17, 1939
Ma. Mercedes L. Barba Vs. Licea De Cagayan University, 6.8. No. 193857. November
23. 2012
‘.
\'\1\\
RULE 11
WHEN TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS
RU LE 12
BILL OF PARTICULARS
RULE 13
FILING AND SERVICE OF PLEADINGS,
JUDGMENTS AND OTHER PAPERS
Heirs of Eugenia Lopez Sr., v. Enriquez, 6.8. No. 146262, 21 January 2005.
Tongohon v. CA, 6.8. No. 123582, 21 December 2004]
Banquet Electric Cooperative, inc. v. NLRC, 6.8. No. 89070 May 18, 1992
V '1‘ V V T
RULE 14
SUMMONS
Planters Development Bank, Vs. Julie Chandumal, 6.8. No. 19561905 September 2012
Oominal v. Castillo, 6.8. No. 152776, Oct. 8, 2003
Optima Realty Corporation Vs. Hertz Phil, Exclusive, inc. 6.8. No. 183035. January
9, 2013
Pagalaran v. Roi-latan, 13 Phil. 135
\\\‘\\\\\\\'\'VVV
\V‘t\‘1\\\\\\‘\‘\\\\\\\‘
RULE 15
MOTIONS
RULE 16
MOTION TO DISMISS
Gumaban v. Lorin [422 Phil. 222, 230 [2001]}, cited in Karon v. Palanco, Jr. {481
PM 168, 180
[2004]
Republic of the Philippines, rep. by the Regional Executive Director of the
Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Regional Office No. 3 Vs. Roman Catholic
Archbishop of
Manila/Samahang Kobuhayon ng San Lorenzo KKK, inc. rep. by its vice President
Zenaida Turla
Vs. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila. 6.8. No. 1929?.‘0‘68. No. 192994. November
12,
2012
V‘I'I'ti‘l
RULE 17
DISMISSAL OF ACTION5
Eloisa Merchandising, inc. And Trebel international, inc, Vs Bantu De Oro Universal
Engracio M. Escasinas, Jr., in His Capacity As Ex-Offiria Sheriff 0! The Ric of
Malian
No. 192716.1une13,2012
\\‘\“
Bank And
City. 6 a
RULE 18
PRE-TRIAL
\‘V‘\
RULE 19
INTERVENTION
nuns 20
CALENDAR or CASES
RULE 21
SUBPOENA
- ,M men. 6.6- l -
1v People v 0 J GR "0‘ 158275'June13_ 2003 500 Phil 275
RULE 22
COMPUTATION OF TIME
RULE 23-29
Modes of discovery
RULE 30
TRIAL
RULE 31
CONSOLIDATION OR SEVERANCE
RULE 32
TRIAL 81' COMMISSIONER
RULE 33
DEMURRER TO EVIDENCE
an No.173003.
Nenita Gonzales. Et. Al. Vs. Mariano 8118350f 0"“ “‘0’ Busuv’
RULE 34
JUDGMENT ON THE PLEAOINGS
De Luna v. Abrigo, 181 SCRA 150
Taleon vs. Sec. of Public Works 8 C
Capitol Motors vs. ‘iabut, 32 SCRA
7
ammunication, L-24281. May 19, 196
‘ .
RULE 35
summer iuaomrrrrs
y Hardware And Construction
' Merced
Spouses Ramon \hlluga And Executive Vi
2010
' Bank vs. Chua, 15 November I I VI ’ 39505
IBnLli‘IZZSRomualdezMarcas. Vs. Republic OfThe Philippines, 6.8. No 1
RULE 36
Dare Adventure Farm Corporation \is. Spouses Felix and Nenita Ng, Spouses Martin
and
Atucena N5 and Agripina R. Goa-orig, et al. 6.8. No. 161122. September 24, 2012
RULE 37
NEW TRIAL OR RECONSIDERATION
RULE 38
RELIEF FROM JUDGMENTS, ORDERS.
OR OTHER PROCEEDINGS
s Versola v. CA, 31 Ju y
23:1: v. Director of Lands, 6.8. No. L-13334, a
SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSION VS RIZAL POULTRY, G. .
LZK Holdings and Development Corporation v. Planters
January 20, 2014
ST. AVIATION SER
2006
18 March 1919
No. 167050, June 1, 2011
Development Bank, 6.8. No. 187973,