‘INN‘IN‘I‘N‘I

‘1"! ‘1' V \' ‘3‘ ‘I' ‘I‘ T ‘1' T T '1' ‘1' ‘1' ‘I' R" V ‘I'

‘.

‘ “Mu-a.

REMEDIAL LAW REVIEW I

First Semester: 2018-2019

THE 1997 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Rules 1 to 71
(Coarse Outline/Syllabus oI'Caaea)

PART I

Introduction/Essential Concepts of Rules of Court:

De Guia vs. De Guia, 6.8. No. 135384, April 4, 2001

Public Estates Authority vs. Yuyuico, 6.8. No. 140-486, February 6, 2001).
Bermejo vs. Barrios, 31 5684. 764, 776 [1971].

Unity Fishing Development Corp. vs. CA, 6.8. No. 145415, February 2, 2001.
Smith Bell Co., vs. CA, 267 SCRA 530 [1997]

Echegaray vs. Secretary of Justice, 6.8. No. 132601, January 19, 1999

PQPPP?’

General Principles

Ateneo v. De La Rosa, 6.8. Na. L-286, March 28, 1946}

Bustos v. Lucero, 6.8. No. L-2086, March 8, 1949 Motion for Reconsideration
Resolution
Priscilla Alma Jose, Vs. Ramon C. Javeliana, Et AL, 6.8. No. 158239, January 25,
2012
Panay Railways inc., Vs. Heva Management And Development Corporation, Pamplona
Agra-industrial Corporation, And Spouses Candelaria Dayot And Edmundo Dayot, G. R.
No. 154061, January 25, 2012

Building Care Corporation/Leopard Security 81 investigation Agency And/Or Ruperto

Protacio, Vs. Myrna Macaraeg, 6.8. No. 19835710 December 2012

Mca-be Countdown Cords Philippines lnc., Amabie ll. Guiluz V, Amobie C. Aguiluz ix,
Cielo C. Aguiiuz, Alberto L. Buenviaie, Vicente Acsay And Mca Holdings And
Management
Corporation, Vs. be Card international Limited And be Discount Card Limited, 6.8.
No.
173586, March 14, 2012

Douglas F. Anama Vs. Philippine Savings Bonlr, 6.8. No. 187021, January 25, 2012

Felix Martos, Jimmy Eciana, Rodel Pilones, et al. Vs. New San Jose Builders, inc.,
6.8. No.
192650. October 24, 2012
savor-I

10.

11.

12.

13.
14.

15. Maria Consolacion Rivera-Poscuoi, Vs. Spouses Marilyn Lim And George Lim And
The
Registry Of Deeds 0f Valenzuela City, 6.8. No. 191837, September 19, 2012

16. Commissioner of internal Revenue v. Migrant Pagbilaa Corporation, 6.8. No.

159593.
October 12, 2006

17. SM Land, inc. (Formerly Shoemart, inc.) and Watsons Personal Care Store,
Phiis., inc. Vs.
City of Manila, Liberty Toledo, in her official capacity as the City Treasurer of
Manila, et
oi. 6.8. No. 197151. October 22, 2012

18. Pinga v. Heirs ofSantiago, 6.8 No. 170354, June 30, 2006

19. Minerva A. Gomez-Castillo vs. COMELEC, 6.8. No. 187231, June 22, 2011

20. in the Matter fo the Petition for the issuance of a Writ of Amparo in Favor of
Carlos

lsagani T. Zarate Vs. Major General Reynaldo Mopagu, Commanding General of the
Philippine Army's 10th infantry Division, or al., 6.8. No. 189689/G.R. No.
189690/G.R.
No. 189691. November 13, 2012

Scanned with CamScanner

21. 0.5. v. Tamparong, 6.8. No. 9527, August 23, 1915

22. Pepple v. Mariana, 6.8. L-40527, June 30, 1976

23. Audi AG v. Mejia, 6.8. No. 167533, July 27. 2007:

24. De los Reyes v. People, 6.8. No. 138297, January 27, 2006

25. United Claimants Association of NEA (Unican) Vs. National Electrification

Administration
{NEAL 6.8. No. 187107, January 31, 2012

26. Phlvidec industrial Authority v. Cagayan Electric Power and Light Co., lnc.,
6.8. No.
127371, 25 April 2002

RULE 1
GENERAL PROVISONS
Manolo vs. CA, 6.8. No. 129242, January 16, 2001.

Manchester Development Corp. vs. CA, 149 SCRA 562 [1987].

Sun insurance Office Ltd. Vs. Asuncion, 170 SCRA 274 [1989].
Ballatan vs. CA, 304 SCRA 34 [1997].

Ayala Land, inc. VS. Carpo, 6.8. No. 140162, November 22, 2000.
Sps. Go v. Tong, 6.8. No. 151942, 27 Nov 2003

Shelter v. Estate of Shelter, 6:43. No. 157912, 13 Dec. 2007}

Original Development and Construction Corp. vs. CA, 202 SCRA 753:
National Steel Corp. vs. CA, 302 SCRA 523).

Ago Timber Corp. vs. Ruiz, L-23887, Dec. 26, 1997).

T V Y " 8' "I' T T Y '1‘

RULE 2
CAUSE OF ACTION

Goodland Company, inc, vs. Asia United Bank, Abraham Co, Atty. Joel T. Pelicono And
The
Register Of Deeds Of Makati City, 6.8. No. 195561, March 14, 2012

Relucio vs. Lopez, 373 SCRA 578, 2002

Banayos vs. Susana Realty, inc., 71 SCRA 557

Juana Complex l Homeowners Association, lnc., et al. vs. Ell-Estate Land, lnc.,
6.8. No. 152272,
March 5, 2012

Asiavest Ltd. Vs. CA, 296 SCRA 539

Damages vs. Jensen, 6.8. No. 158407, January 17, 2005]

Republic vs. CA, 315 SCRA 600].

Volmonte vs. CA, 252 SCRA 93, 100].

Tamano vs. Ortiz, 291 SCRA 584).

Siosoco vs. CA, 303 SCRA 186

National Steel Corporation vs. CA, 302 SCRA 522, 530.

Emergency Loan Pawnshop, inc. vs. CA, 6.8. No. 129184, February 28, 2001).

Multi-Realty Development Corp. v. Mahoti Tuscany Condominium Corp, 6.8. No. 146726,
June
16, 2006

\'\‘\

Y T Y T Y Y T Y ‘I'

RULE 3
PARTIES TO CIVIL ACTIONS
Sena vs. Mangubat, 6.8. No. L-44339, December 2, 1997, cited in Chua vs. Torres,
6.8. No.
151900, August 30, 2005.

Scanned with CamScanner

Riviera Filipinos vs 04. 6.8. No 117355. April 5. 2002

Sy vs Eufemro. 43 SCRA 177. 1972

Maroon-'19an vs. CA. 108 SCRA 3141.

Theodore And Nancy Aug, Represented 8y Flange Marvin 8. Canon, Vs. Spouses Alan And
Em
Aug. 6 8. No 186993, August 22. 2012

With v. Cm, 289 SCRA 624

Samaniego v. Aguilo. 334 SCRA 438

Pubico vs. Jaranrlio. 60 Phil 247

Olrmclt vs CA, October 4, 1988].

tlontero vs. CA. 105 SCRA 609; FIorendo. et. al. vs. Coloma, et. al. 129 SCRA 304.

Boutisto vs, de Gunman, 125 SCRA 682. 1983!.

Oposa v. Foctomn. 6.8. No. 101083. 1993

Tucson v. Bolanos, 6.8. No. L-25894. Jan. 30, 1971

Simny 6. Guy, Geraldine 6. Guy. Gladys 6. Yea, And The Heirs of the Late Grace 6.
Cheu Vs.
Gilbert 6. Guy. 6.8. No. 189486, September 05, 2012

Living 9 Sense. inc. Vs. Malayan insurance Company, inc. 6.8. No. 193753. September
26. 2012
Sepulveda, Sr. v. Pelaez, 6.8. No. 152195, 31 January 2005

Aigura v. 160. 6.8. No. 150135. October 30, 2006

iboriez v. Roman Catholic Church, 12 Phil. 227

Chinese Flour importers Assoc. v. Price Stabilization Board, 9 Phil. 461

V‘T“""R*\'\ "I!"

‘7 ‘7 T

\' \"

RULE 4
VENUE OF ACTIONS

Nocum and Philippine Daily lnquirer v. Tan, 6.8. No. 145022, September 23, 2005

El Hagar Filipino v. Serra, No. 36627, November 19, 1932

Mijares, et al. v. Piccio, et al., [-10458 April 22,1957; Regalado, 2010

Pagioum Management 8. Development Corp. And Health Marketing Technologies, lnc.,

Vs.
Union Bank Of The Philippines, Notary Public John Doe, And Register Of Deeds Of
Cebu City And
Cebu Province, SJ. King .1 Sons 60., inc. intervenor, 6.8. No. 179018, June 18,
2012

Polytde Corp. v. Bianca, 6.8. No. b27033, 1969

Sweet Lines v. Teves, 6.8. No. 28324, May19. 1972

Eastern Assurance 8‘: Surety Corp. v. Cui, 6.8. No. L-54452, July 20 1981

Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, 6.8. No. 152154, July 15, 2003

Agustin v. Bocalon, L-16000 March 18, 1985

Colo v. Ajax, b20865, March 13, 1968

Gala v. Gayalo. 6.8. No. 26768, Oct. 30, 1970

Phiitranco Service Enterprises, lnc., Vs. Felix Paras And inland Trailways, inc,
And Han. Court Of
Appeals. 6.8. No. 161909, April 25, 2012

Heirs of Olivas v. Flor, L-78343 May 21, 1988

1‘ ‘I' i” Y

R \ \'\"\'T\'\'

RULE S
UNIFORM PROCEDURE IN TRIAL COURTS

RULE 6
KINDS OF PLEADINGS

Spouses Ponciano v. Parentela, 6.8. No. 133284, 9 May 2000

> Eastern Assurance 8c Surety Corp. v. Cui, 6.8. 054452, 20 July 1981].
p Pascuai v. Boutista, 33 SCRA 301, 1970;

a Firestone Tire 8 Rubber Co. v. Temponglto, 27 SCRA 418, 1969].

Scanned with CamScanner

In Read Vda. De Dias v. Baiagot. 20 SCRA 950; 1967

RULE 7
PARTS OF A PLEADING

Felix Martos, Jimmy E clana, Rodei Piiones. et al. Vs. New San Jose Builders, inc,
6.8. No.
192650. October 24, 2012
Pascual and Santos, lnc. v. The Members of the Tramo Walrus Neighborhood
Association, inc,
6.8. No. 144880, November 17,200

Elsa D. Medado vs. Heirs of the Late Antonio Cansing, 6.8. No. 186720, February 8,
2012

Atty. Fe O. Palmiano-Solvador Vs. Constantino Angeies, Substituted By Lu: 6.

Angeles, 6.8. No.
171219. September 3 2012

Georgia T. Estel, vs. Recaredo P. Dieoo, Sr. and Recareda 8. Diego. in. 6.8. No.
174082. January
16, 2012

City of Cebu v. Del Rosario. 6.8. No. 169341, 22 November 2006

Barroso v. Ampig. Jr., 328 SCRA 530. 536 [2000]

Marcopper Mining Corp. v. Solidbanlt Corp. 432 SCRA 360

Cosuponon v. Laroya, 6.8. No. 145391, 26 August 2002

Sps. Dar v. Alonzo-Legasto, 30 Aug. 2000

Santos v. CA, 5 July 2001

8Pi Leasing Corp. v. CA, 18 Nov. 2003].

Expertravei and Tours inc. v. CA, 26 May 2005:

Shelter v. Estate of Sheker, 6.8. No. 157912, 13 December 2007

Vivian T. Ramirez Et. AL, vs. Mar Fishing Co., inc, Mirarnar Fishing Co., inc,
Robert Buehs And
Jerome Spitz, 6.8. Na. 168208.1une 13, 2012

‘ .

V \‘R'!’ T 9' T " 1' \'

RULE 8
MANNER OF MAKING ALLEGATIONS IN PLEADINGS

Acobal vs. Acabai, 31 March 2005

Toribio v. Bidin, 134 SCRA 162

Tontuico, Jr. v. Republic, 6.8. No. 89114, December 2, 1991

BM. rem-re Associates Corporation vs. University Of Santa Tomas, 6.8. No. 189496,
February
1., 2012

"Y‘ Y

RULE 9
EFFECT OF FAILURE TO PLEAD
Financial Building Corp. v. Forbes Parit Association. 6.8. No. 133119, 17 August
2000

Caviii v. Fiorendo, 6.8. No. 73039.9 October 1987

Tijam v. Sibonghanoy, 6.8. No. L-21450, April 15, 1968

Natividad Lim Vs. National Power Corporation, Sps. Roberto Li. Arcinue and Arabeia
Arcinue,
6.8. No. 178789. November 14, 2012

Magdiwang Realty Corporation, Renato P. Dragon And Esperanza Tolentino Vs. The
Manila
Banking Corporation, Substituted By First Savereign Asset Management i5vamc), inc.,
6 .R. No.
195592, 5 Sep 2012

Philippine Tourism Authority, Vs. Philippine Golf Development 8 Equipment, lnc.,

6.8. No.
176628. 6.8. No. 176628 March 19. 2012

\\"\

Scanned with CamScanner

RULE 10
AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADINGS

r Siasoco v. CA, 303 SCRA 186

Philippine ports Authority v. William Gothong and Abaltlz, inc, 6.8. No. 158401, 28
January
2008

Chlng v. CA, 331 SCRA 16

Dog Pang v. Custodlo, [-14911, March 25, 1961

Rosario v. Carangdang, 6.8. No. 1-7076, April 28, 1955

Surlgao Mine Exploration Co. v. Harris, 6.8. No. L-45543, May 17, 1939

Ma. Mercedes L. Barba Vs. Licea De Cagayan University, 6.8. No. 193857. November
23. 2012

‘.

\'\1\\

RULE 11
WHEN TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS

Sormlento v. Juan, No. 56605 January 28, 1983

Gala v. Goyola, 6.8. No. L-26768, 30 October 1970

RU LE 12
BILL OF PARTICULARS

RULE 13
FILING AND SERVICE OF PLEADINGS,
JUDGMENTS AND OTHER PAPERS

Prudential Bank v. Business Assistance Group, 16 December 2004

Lanada v. CA, 6.8. No. 102390, 1 February 2002

Heirs of Eugenia Lopez Sr., v. Enriquez, 6.8. No. 146262, 21 January 2005.
Tongohon v. CA, 6.8. No. 123582, 21 December 2004]

Banquet Electric Cooperative, inc. v. NLRC, 6.8. No. 89070 May 18, 1992

V '1‘ V V T

RULE 14
SUMMONS

Minucher v. CA 6.8. No.142963, Feb. 11, 2003

Planters Development Bank, Vs. Julie Chandumal, 6.8. No. 19561905 September 2012
Oominal v. Castillo, 6.8. No. 152776, Oct. 8, 2003

Optima Realty Corporation Vs. Hertz Phil, Exclusive, inc. 6.8. No. 183035. January
9, 2013
Pagalaran v. Roi-latan, 13 Phil. 135

Ong v. Custodio, L-14911, 25 March 1961;

Viason Enterprises v. CA, 310 SCRA 261

Fetalino v. Sons, 44 Phil. 691

Lous v. CA, 219 SCRA 688, 691

Umandap vs. Sabla, Jr., 339 SCRA 243

Smantino vs. Roan, 383 SCRA 664, 670, 2002

Manolo: v. CA, 6.8. No. 130974, 16 August 2006,

Miranda vs. CA, 326 SCRA 278

UCPB v. Ongpln, 6.8. No. 146593, 26 October 2001

\\\‘\\\\\\\'\'VVV

Scanned with CamScanner

Damggas vs. Jensen, 6.8. No. 155847, 17 January 2005

Any Ping V. CA, 310 SCRA 34

Robinson v. Mirailes, 6.8. No 163584, 12 December 2006

Mason v. CA, 6.8. No 144662. October 13, 2003

Baltarar v. CA, 6.8. No. 78728.8 December 1933

5, 5. Villarasa 8 Partner Ca, Ltd V. Judge Benito. 5 R No 135426, 5 August 1999
BM v. Spouses Santiago, 6.8. No. 169116, 26 March 2007:
Droso v. CA, 261 SCRA 376

Tyson’s Super Concrete inc. v. CA, 23 June 2005

H6. Zachry Company international vs. CA, 232 SCRA 329

Poirot v. Morgan, 28 Phil. 597].

Northwest Orient Airlines v. CA, 241 SCRA 192 [1995]]

Pantoleon v. Asuncion, 105 Phil. 761 [1959]

Kawasaki Port Service Corp. v. Amores, 199 SCRA 230,

Santa Do Brasil vs. CA, 333 SCRA 545 [2000]
Romuaidervticoras v Licaros, 401 SCRA 762 [2003]
Gemperie v. Scheniter, 19 SCRA 45 [1967].

Vaimonte v. CA, 252 SCI-“IA 93 [1996]]

Montaiban v. Maximo. 22 SCRA 1070, 15 March 1968

Santos v. PNOC, 6.8. No. 170943, September 23, 2003

\V‘t\‘1\\\\\\‘\‘\\\\\\\‘

RULE 15
MOTIONS

' ' 0 May 29, 2007

Vista Liner, inc. v. Malinas. G.FI. ND. 15117 .
W pine Savings Rank, 6.8. No. 187021,

Douglas F. Anama Vs. Philip I

United Pulp and Paper Co, inc. vs. Acropolis Central Guaranty

January 25, 2012 I

Heirs of Dr. Mariana Favis, Sr., represented by their c’a-he
' ' - ' . Juana Gonzo es,
Favrs and Nelly Favrs Villafuente v I . I
represented herein by their parents, Sps. Mariana Fans and Larceirta D.

January 15, 2014 I

Marikina Valley Dev't. Corp. v. Hon. Flora,

January 25, 2012

Corporation, 6.8. No. 171750,

irs and attorneys-info“, Mercedes A.

her son Mariano Favis, all minors
Favis,6.8. No. 185922,

6.8. No. 110801, December 8, 1995

RULE 16
MOTION TO DISMISS

Gumaban v. Lorin [422 Phil. 222, 230 [2001]}, cited in Karon v. Palanco, Jr. {481
PM 168, 180
[2004]
Republic of the Philippines, rep. by the Regional Executive Director of the
Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Regional Office No. 3 Vs. Roman Catholic
Archbishop of
Manila/Samahang Kobuhayon ng San Lorenzo KKK, inc. rep. by its vice President
Zenaida Turla
Vs. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila. 6.8. No. 1929?.‘0‘68. No. 192994. November
12,
2012

Erlongerll Erlanger, inc. v. Viiiamor, L-8767, 23 March 1956].

Casimiro vs. Rogue, 98 Phil. 880]

Pineda v. Heirs of Guevarra, 6.8. No. 143188, Feb. 14, 2007!

5.05. Hontlveros v. RTC, 6R 125465. 29 Jun 1999

Galeon v. Gaieon, 49 SCRA 516

MR Holdings, Ltd. V. Solar, 6.8. No. 138104, April 11, 2002

V‘I'I'ti‘l

Scanned with CamScanner

RULE 17
DISMISSAL OF ACTION5

gAc Mfg. 8 Sales Corp. v. 01.6.8. No.967341 Hum,“ 199;

Republic Planters Bani: v. Molina, 166 5014 39}

Go v. Cruz, et al., 6.8. No. 58986. April 17, 1933

Eloisa Merchandising, inc. And Trebel international, inc, Vs Bantu De Oro Universal
Engracio M. Escasinas, Jr., in His Capacity As Ex-Offiria Sheriff 0! The Ric of
Malian
No. 192716.1une13,2012

\\‘\“

Bank And
City. 6 a

RULE 18
PRE-TRIAL

Soguld v. CA, June 10. 2003

Sarmiento v. Juan, 6.8. No. 566-5, January 28. 1983

Cabrera v. COMELEC, 6.8. No. 182084, October 8, 2003
BPI v. Spouses Genuino. 6.8. No. 208792, July 22. 2015

\‘V‘\

RULE 19
INTERVENTION

‘7 Peyer v. Martinez, 88 Phil. 72];

r Ciardidades v. MercadenG-R NO-L'20341' Mal 14‘ 1966

nuns 20
CALENDAR or CASES

RULE 21
SUBPOENA

-24154, 31 October 1967

- ,M men. 6.6- l -
1v People v 0 J GR "0‘ 158275'June13_ 2003 500 Phil 275

r Raco v. Contreras. et.ai..

RULE 22
COMPUTATION OF TIME

RULE 23-29
Modes of discovery

r Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, 6.8. No. 112710, May 30, 2001

‘r Rosete v. Lim 6.8 No.136051, June 8, 2006
r Lanada vs. CA, 1 February 2002

Scanned with CamScanner

RULE 30
TRIAL

RULE 31
CONSOLIDATION OR SEVERANCE

RULE 32
TRIAL 81' COMMISSIONER

RULE 33
DEMURRER TO EVIDENCE

an No.173003.

Nenita Gonzales. Et. Al. Vs. Mariano 8118350f 0"“ “‘0’ Busuv’

February 22. 2012

RULE 34
JUDGMENT ON THE PLEAOINGS
De Luna v. Abrigo, 181 SCRA 150
Taleon vs. Sec. of Public Works 8 C
Capitol Motors vs. ‘iabut, 32 SCRA

7
ammunication, L-24281. May 19, 196

‘ .

RULE 35
summer iuaomrrrrs
y Hardware And Construction

1 ' , Vs. Kell

"3 Wlusa tempt-swam. And General

' Merced
Spouses Ramon \hlluga And Executive Vi

Supply Inc., Represented 8y Ernesto v. Yu,

Manager. 6.8. No. 176570, July 18. 2012

2010
' Bank vs. Chua, 15 November I I VI ’ 39505
IBnLli‘IZZSRomualdezMarcas. Vs. Republic OfThe Philippines, 6.8. No 1

RULE 36

JUDGMENTS, FINAL ORDERS AND ENTRY THEREOF

Henderson v. Tan, 87 Phil. 466

Lichauco v. Tan, 51 Phil. 862

Corpus vs. Sandiganbavan, 442 SCRA 294, 309

Acosta vs. COMELEC, 293 5814 578, 580 I
Cu+Unjieng vs. Mabalacat Sugar Co., 70 Phil. 384
People vs. Derpo, 168 SCRA 447, 455

Ago vs. CA, 6 SCRA 530, 535

Bernardo de Leon vs. Public Estate Authority,

Col. Francisco Dela Merced Us. Government
November 23, 2011

Dare Adventure Farm Corporation \is. Spouses Felix and Nenita Ng, Spouses Martin
and
Atucena N5 and Agripina R. Goa-orig, et al. 6.8. No. 161122. September 24, 2012

Development Bank of the Philippines lOBPl v. Guariila Agricultural and Realty

Development
Corporation, 6.8. No. 160758. January 15, 2014

6.8. No. 181970. August 3, 2010

Service Insurance System, 6.8. No. 167140.

Scanned with CamScanner

RULE 37
NEW TRIAL OR RECONSIDERATION

News v. CA, on. No. 141524, 14 September 2005

RULE 38
RELIEF FROM JUDGMENTS, ORDERS.
OR OTHER PROCEEDINGS

Sps. Mesina v. Meer, 2 July 2001

RULE 39
EXECUTION, SATlSFACTION AND EFFECT OF JUIIMEMENTs

CAGAYAN DE 080 V5 CA, .8. No. 129713. December 15, 1999

HEIRS OF RETERTA VS MORES 8: LOPEZ, 6.8. No. 159941, August 17, 2011
BUAYA V5 STRONGHOLD INSURANCE, 6.8. No. 139020. October 11, 2000
VLASON VS CA, 68. N05. 121662-64. JULY 6, 1999
PALLADA VS RTC OF KALIBO, 6.8. No. 129442. March 10, 1999
CORONA INTERNATIONAL VS CA, 6.8. No. 127851. October 18, 2000 o? 121
JACA V. LUMBER CO., 6.8. NO. L-25771, MARCH 29, 1982; 113 SCRA: .
INFANTE VS. ARAN BUILDERS, INC, 6.8. NO.156596, 24 AUGUST 200
TING V5. HEIRS OF LIRIO, 6.8. NO. 168913, 14 MARCH 2007
VILLARIN V5 MUNASQUE, 6.8. No. 169444, September 17, 20081
LEACHON V5 PASCUA, AM. No. 8-11-2972, SEPTEMBER 28, 201
CALUAG VS PECSON, October 29, 1948, 6.8. No. L-1403
SPOUSES VERSOLA VS. CA, 6.8. NO. 16474031 JULY 2005
CHING V5. CA, 6.8. NO. 124642, FEBRUARY 23, 2004
Selga vs SONY, 6.8. No. 1751sibgzptember 21, 2011

s Versola v. CA, 31 Ju y
23:1: v. Director of Lands, 6.8. No. L-13334, a
SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSION VS RIZAL POULTRY, G. .
LZK Holdings and Development Corporation v. Planters
January 20, 2014
ST. AVIATION SER
2006

18 March 1919
No. 167050, June 1, 2011
Development Bank, 6.8. No. 187973,

VICES VS GRAND INTERNATIONAL AIRWAYS, 6.8. NO. 140288, OCTOBER 23,

Scanned with CamScanner