Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Simon Morley
To cite this article: Simon Morley (2016) ‘Free and easy wandering’: Agnes Martin and the limits of
intercultural dialogue, World Art, 6:2, 247-268, DOI: 10.1080/21500894.2016.1145132
Download by: [University of East Anglia Library] Date: 13 December 2017, At: 04:46
World Art, 2016
Vol. 6, No. 2, 247–268, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21500894.2016.1145132
Research Article
I examine the impact of East Asian ideas on the paintings and writings
of the American artist Agnes Martin (1912–2004), arguing that her
relationship to such ideas was complex and often contradictory – at
least on the level of the discourse she herself erected around her
painting. I argue that while in practice her paintings express a view
of subjectivity that is more familiar and more valued within East
Asian culture, in her theory Martin nevertheless remained bound by
Western dualistic thinking. The difference between the discursive
nature of her writings and the nature of her writings and thinking,
and the modality of her paintings draws attention to a more general
problematic: the relationship between, on the one hand, the
hermeneutic mode of awareness in art, and, on the other hand, the
non-discursive mode of awareness in art practice. I draw attention to
the latter mode, which foregrounds corporeal expansions and
extensions of the borders of the material body. The experience
Martin sought to convey is based on unconscious, holistic intuition
rather than on the conscious, reflexive presentation of information.
But when it came to articulating her intentions linguistically in her
texts, Martin often defaulted to deep-rooted notions coming from her
background culture. This is not surprising, insofar as she was
inevitably bound to a paradigm from which she could not entirely
escape, one in which process and ‘becoming’ were denigrated and
under-theorized.
Keywords: Agnes Martin; contemporary American painting; East
Asian thought; Zen Buddhism; ‘figurality’; François Jullien; concepts
of identity; cognitive metaphor theory
In free and easy wandering there is only freshness and adventure. It is really
awareness of perfection within the mind.
Agnes Martin (1998: 71)
*Email: morleysimon@hotmail.com
© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
248 Simon Morley
The great image, that is, the image that contains all images (in the manner of
the Tao) and manifests the source of things, is an un-imaged image, but it is
not abstract (it does not refer to the level of essences): it has simply liberated
its character of image from any anecdotal or specific aspect of its content; by
retaining the indistinct, it remains open to plenitude.
François Jullien (2000: 291)
part of a subversive and emancipatory ‘economy’ of the self, and she was
certainly not alone in believing that the transformations she sought
could best be achieved through learning from what can broadly be
defined as ‘East Asian thought’.1
As can be seen from the quotation at the beginning of this essay, on
occasion, Martin directly evokes East Asian thought in her writings. But
when she declares more elusively: ‘These paintings are about freedom
from the cares of this world’ (Martin 1998: 39), she is also implicitly
drawing on the wisdom of a worldview in which detachment from ‘the
cares of the world’ is a primary goal.2
In what follows, I will examine the impact of ‘East Asian’ ideas on
Martin’s painting and writing in relation to the question of subjectivity,
proposing that her relationship to East Asian ideas was complex and
often contradictory – at least on the level of the discourse she erected
around her painting practice.3 Indeed, there is often a disjunction
between what an artist says about their work and what the work actually
does during an encounter, and this is an issue that extends further than
simply the ‘intentional fallacy’.
embodied rootedness in the flux of nature, rather than as the quest for
oneness with a transcendent ideal or essence, Eastern thought was under-
stood to radically undermine the premises of Western ontology. So the
‘Eastern’ thrust of the Western critique of its own values and beliefs was
directed at the limited horizon of the dominant version of ‘enlightenment’
in the West, a version that was considered responsible for most of the evils
into which the West had fallen. In this worldview, nature was understood
to be something external to the subject – there to be managed through
knowledge. Because of this, the subject was construed as standing
outside what it sees, and to be capable of capturing an eternal moment
Downloaded by [University of East Anglia Library] at 04:46 13 December 2017
and visual vocabularies from diverse origins. The complexities and contra-
dictions inherent in this creative process are evident when we consider the
contradictions in Martin’s often gnomic writings.
Implicit here is the idea that the natural world is of special value
because it is understood to be a storehouse of signs and symbols that
can be recalled in the human mind – ‘recollected in tranquillity’, as Words-
worth famously wrote6 – thereby serving as triggers for memories of the
more ‘real’ dimension of timeless, immaterial and higher truths. As a
result of this confluence of ideas, ‘nature’ is understood to serve as a stimu-
lus for positive emotions, a doorway to a more really ‘real’ located in the
beyond, in a transcendent dimension far removed from the transitoriness
of nature itself. Mind and spirit are construed as independent from the
body, and are put in relation to a higher, invisible reality. ‘Perfection’
becomes something to be found outside and distinct from the body and
from nature.
252 Simon Morley
all these can be said to arise ceaselessly as new accommodations from a locus
of emptiness that absolutely negates the human standpoint.9
non-being (hi-u), as the negation of being (u), but also contains a sense
that goes beyond this, and this ‘additional sense’ is brought to life when
the originariness of nothingness is existentially realized and thoughtfully
cultivated.
Practice
A particularly striking aspect of Martin’s paintings is how they directly
engage sensory-motor faculties, and in particular, the kinaesthetic sense
– or movement as it relates to vision. Martin shifted from the visual dimen-
sion to incorporate the kinaesthetic, thus ensuring that the motor system of
the body is operative and attuned. She consciously incorporated different
and mobile viewing positions into the total meaning of her work; and
brought on by such movement, a peculiarly emphatic metamorphosis
occurs within the affective responses to her work.10
When viewing Martin’s paintings, the contrast of figure against ground,
which normally establishes coherent and stable contours and boundaries,
is rendered contingent. At about 20 feet, a typical painting by Martin looks
like a flat, lightly coloured square hanging vertically on the wall (Figure 1).
In her work from the 1960s, such as The Field (1965; Figure 2), this rec-
tangle seems almost monochrome, while in her later works, such as
Untitled #3 (1974; Figure 3), we discern vertical bands of subtly differen-
tiated colour. In this viewing stage, Martin’s work functions as a whole – a
unified, symmetrical, total and harmonious field. The square canvas is a
‘figure’ against the ‘ground’ of the wall; and in the case of The Field,
there is also a square ‘figure’ set within the ‘ground’ of the canvas itself.
This produces a clear gestalt, a relatively uncomplicated experience of a
simple geometric container within the surrounding and unnoticed visual
field.
At a distance of about 15–18 feet, however, something new happens.
The planarity of the square gives way to chromatic fluidity, to vibration
or pulse. Subtle modulated variations can be noted in the brushwork of
oil – and, in her later work, acrylic – paint. In these later works, the differ-
entiated bands of colour also become more pronounced. The square canvas
256 Simon Morley
Downloaded by [University of East Anglia Library] at 04:46 13 December 2017
now seems to be a kind of loose and expanding container for vague, inde-
terminate, virtual space, and this generates the visual sensation of nebu-
lous illumination and depth. The optics of this stage involve the viewer
Figure 2. Agnes Martin, The Field, 1965, graphite and oil on canvas, 188 × 188 cm,
E.ON Art Collection. Copyright VG Bild-kunst, Bonn, 2015.
World Art 257
Downloaded by [University of East Anglia Library] at 04:46 13 December 2017
Figure 3. Agnes Martin, Untitled #3, 1974, acrylic, graphite and plaster on canvas,
183 × 183 cm, Des Moines Art Center, 1992. Purchased with funds from the Coffin
Fine Arts Trust and part donation of Arnold and Mildred Glimcher; Nathan Emory
Coffin. Photo: Bill Jacobson, courtesy Pace Gallery, © VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn, 2015.
in a more elusive kind of seeing. There is low visual contrast and differen-
tiation, and discrete boundaries soften or cede to an undifferentiated con-
tinuum. We feel open and absorbed into an ambient field, or that we are
encountering a semi-transparent membrane. It is also in this stage that
the imagination is most engaged, memories are stirred, and the metapho-
rical potential of painting is maximally deployed. We can make analogies
with nature, analogies with nature, with effects generated by aqueous or
gaseous phenomena such as mists, fogs, clouds, the ocean, and so on.
Martin draws her visual sources for this experience of openness and inse-
cure containment from memories of environments within which the
subject feels located in medias res, or at the margins, periphery, or
extreme limits. For example, one of the prime environmental sources for
such an expanded concept of self is the sight of the ocean or of some
such wide-open unbounded region, or the sky itself.11
But this situation soon collapses as we continue on our journey towards a
close encounter with the surfaces of Martin’s paintings. In works from the
1960s and early 1970s, the viewer perceives a grid-like structure on top of
the delicately painted surface, while in later works, a sequence of unequally
spaced but parallel horizontal lines marks the boundaries between the
coloured horizontal stripes. Martin produced these lines by running a graph-
ite pencil along a straight edge; and because they traverse textured canvas, the
258 Simon Morley
traces are uneven and slightly wobbly. It is a very tentative structure, but a
structure nevertheless. Furthermore, the repetitiveness of the grid or horizon-
tal or vertical lines, and the persistent straightness of these lines, suggest con-
centrated and rhythmic effort, or focused action over time, thus serving as an
indexical sign of the absent body of the artist. We return to a kind of figure/
ground segregation – this time internal – with the lines standing out from
the ground. However, because they are so tentative, and because they are
part of a grid-like continuum, they never attain fully secure figure status,
and instead remain provisional, even when viewed close up.
Kinaesthetic interaction foregrounds sensitivity to environmental con-
Downloaded by [University of East Anglia Library] at 04:46 13 December 2017
ditions. In this sense, Martin’s paintings are more like open events in
time than closed objects in space, and they make a bridge between painting
as it is conventionally construed and the more relational, ‘open’, unframed
formats that began to dominate art in the 1960s, and today are a familiar
artistic strategy.12 Martin’s paintings are concerned with momentum,
orientation and contingency as much as with colour, tonality, texture,
line, volume, and figure/ground segregations. This is also why they take
serial form: she was less concerned with producing aesthetic affects
through the contemplation of visual effects than with substantiating a
binding experience through ritualized repetition.13
control of the object Self by the Subject is desirable, but even in English
we sometimes speak of noncontrol of the self in a positive sense’. The
word ‘ecstasy’, for example, is used in English to communicate the experi-
ence of an extreme instance of pleasurable loss of control. The word comes
from the Greek ekstasis, meaning ‘standing outside oneself’. It derives
from ek- ‘out’ + histanai ‘to place’, and thus depends on a core spatial or
locational metaphor.
But as Sigmund Freud made clear, the subject with which we overwhel-
mingly identify – the ‘ego’ – is the result of the conceptualization of the self
as ‘a structured fantasy of consciousness or a kind of primal fantasy of
being as structured’, as Leo Bersani and Ulysse Dutoit (1993: 40) put it.
They continue (138–9):
The body does not consist of walls that are discontinuous between the human
subject and other things in the world or with a core-self that is contained
within it. … It is not a preexisting state or a common embodiment. … The
flux is potentially chaotic, but reliable knowledge is possible through attune-
ment to one’s surroundings, which amounts to perfecting the senses. Attune-
ment is the way to sense shifting flowing boundaries and thereby achieve
more reliable knowledge.
fection’ within the state of becoming, or within process, with the subject
posited as existing in the midst of things.
An encounter with Martin’s paintings, on the other hand, challenges the
tacit assumptions found in her texts. They are a novel blend of diverse cul-
tural inputs, and more successfully break free from the constraints of a
familiar worldview. Such sensitivity to environment and the temporal is
an index of flexibility – of the capacity to tolerate contingency, variability,
novelty and uncertainty. Martin’s paintings enact an ongoing cycle that
involves establishing boundaries and then tentatively relinquishing them,
and this is understood as the expression of ontological plenitude. No
‘essence’ is made accessible, and there is merely a sense of process or meta-
morphosis. Martin’s paintings therefore suggest that any quest for timeless
‘perfection’ will always be stymied by the transformations generated by
physical movements, but that by ‘attuning’ to these transformations we
can come closer to a sense of immanent ‘perfection’. The fact that Martin
chose to articulate this elusive subjective dimension in visual and kinaes-
thetic form emphasizes that it is, ipso facto, something that cannot be cap-
tured in discourse: it is non- or pre-cognitive, and involves the
performative, formative and creative.
Pathologies
Martin’s decision to live in the isolation of New Mexico with her ‘back’
firmly to nature speaks of a desire to be quarantined from the unruly
emotions provoked by social interactions, and this was certainly at the
price of risking emotional and aesthetic ‘autism’. The personal background
to her life choices has become increasingly public knowledge since Martin’s
death (Princenthal 2015). She was diagnosed as paranoid schizophrenic as
a child, and throughout her life wrestled with mental illness, although as
Nancy Princenthal informs us in her biography of the artist, fortuitously,
Martin was not severely impaired. In this context, a more fraught reading
of Martin’s paintings suggests itself. Schizophrenia, as the psychiatrist Iain
McGilchrist (2010: 223) observes, involves excessive self-consciousness –
‘the dragging into the centre of awareness of what should remain outside of
World Art 263
faces close up leads to a loss of global attention. But this returns once we
move back and away, and is therefore relativized. An encounter with her
paintings suggests an attempt to work though excessive localization
through exploring an expanded self that is comfortable and at ease
within a flux-like reality – of ‘neither being nor nothingness’, in Ueda’s
terms. Through her decision to live as a semi-recluse, and through her
ritualized art practice, Martin succeeded in finding ways to live with her
‘demons’. Seen in the light of her psychological illness as a form of thera-
peutic self-disciplining, her painting practice becomes the site for the
working through of the extremes she was obliged to confront as part and
parcel of her illness.
Conclusion
Contemplating Martin’s paintings foregrounds the fact that much impor-
tant knowledge is transmitted in non-discursive ways. Yet in seeking to
interpret not only work like Martin’s, but art more generally, there is
often a problem in articulating how making and thinking, crafting and
knowing, are connected, and in adequately accounting for how raw
things are transformed into stable and ordered forms through the imagin-
ation mixed with bodily actions. We need to find ways to address what
Mark Johnson (2007: 234) calls ‘embodied, immanent meaning’. But
within the Western worldview, interpretation usually takes place in a
way that ‘aligns meaning with the cognitive and thus dismisses quality,
feeling, and emotion from any account of meaning’ (Johnson 2007: 216,
italics in original). Unlike a written text or a piece of music, the meaning
of a visual artwork is inextricably bound up with the medium in which it
is made. As Johnson writes (234), in visual art, ‘it is images, patterns, qual-
ities, colours, and perceptual rhythms that are the principal bearer of
meaning’. Sensory-motor, and non- or pre-cognitive, dimensions are an
intrinsic part of how a painting means. Any artwork is composed of the
discursive and figural14 – that is, born of the relationship between code
and performance. This, in turn, invites two kinds of response: the
264 Simon Morley
Notes
1. By ‘East Asia’ I mean principally China, Japan, and Korea – diverse cultures
linked by the underlying religious, philosophical, and social forces of
Daoism, Buddhism, and Confucianism – just as ‘Euroamerican’ and
‘Western’ refer to diverse cultures linked by the underlying religious, philoso-
phical, and social forces of the Classical heritage and Christianity.
2. Perhaps the most insightful study of Martin’s debt to East Asian thought is
Thomas McEvilley’s essay ‘Grey Geese Descending: The Art of Agnes
Martin’ (1993). See also Chave (1993).
3. A retrospective toured throughout 2015 and 2017 at Tate Modern (3 June – 11
October 2015), Kunstsammlung Nordrhein-Westfalen, Düsseldorf (7 Novem-
ber 2015 – 6 March 2016), Los Angeles County Museum of Art (April – Sep-
tember 2016), and the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York (October
2016 – January 2017). Several new studies and a biography of Martin have
appeared, including the catalogue to the touring exhibition, with essays by
Tiffany Bell and Briony Fer. I have quoted Martin from the 1998 edition of
her writings. A newer collection of her writing can be found in Glimcher
(2012).
4. Zen is the Japanese transliteration of the name for the indigenous school of
Chinese chan Buddhism, meaning ‘meditation’, which blended Mahayana
Buddhism with Daoism, and evolved from the sixth century CE. As the
impact on the West of this form of Buddhism came largely via Japan, ‘Zen’
has become the recognized term.
5. Especially influential was Watts’ ‘Beat Zen, Square Zen, and Zen’ (1960).
6. In the preface to Lyrical Ballads (1800).
7. I follow Martha Nussbaum (1996) in describing ‘Stoicism’ as techniques
evolved in Hellenistic culture and subsequently pervading the Western world-
view, seeking ways to radically reduce the influence of the passions over
human life.
8. Jullien’s analysis of ‘Chinese’ and ‘Greek’ culture is contentious. In particular,
he has been criticized for positing a degree of absolute difference that risks
ignoring anthropological universals. I hope my approach suggests that I
World Art 265
assume the existence of just such an ahistorical foundation. For the most sus-
tained critique of Jullien, see Billeter (2006).
9. Nishitani and Ueda are members of the Kyoto School of philosophy, which is
significant in that it moved the East–West dialogue in the opposite direction,
seeking to absorb Western ideas into Eastern philosophical and religious
traditions.
10. The most insightful discussion of this process is to be found in Krauss (1993).
Krauss draws on Kasha Linville’s phenomenological description of encounter-
ing a painting by Martin, published in the June 1971 Artforum. But Krauss’
model is limited by dependence on a structural reading of painting, which
she matches with an equally limiting psychoanalytic approach. Krauss steers
Downloaded by [University of East Anglia Library] at 04:46 13 December 2017
away from asking the most important questions about an encounter with
the work of Martin: how is it expressive, and of what?
11. Martin was born in Maklin, Saskatchewan, Canada, but grew up in Vancouver.
After studying on the West Coast, she moved to New Mexico in the early 1950s,
eventually dying in Taos. In between, she lived for a decade in New York City,
leaving definitively in 1967 when she settled in New Mexico. The bare bones of
biography reveal that the artist began life in the wide-open spaces of the prai-
ries and chose to end them in the wide-open spaces of the desert. The defining
characteristics, then, of the kind of landscape with which Martin felt familiar
and at ease are: relative homogeneity and lack of diversity, pronounced hori-
zontality, openness of access, diffuseness of atmosphere, vastness of vista, and
absence of strong colour contrast.
12. I draw here on the distinction made by Nicholas Tresilian (2011).
13. For seriality in Martin’s and other artists’ work in the 1960s, see Fer (2004).
14. I use the term ‘figurality’ as it is employed by Norman Bryson in order to
describe those elements of a painting that are not reducible to discursive
code – such as brushstrokes, colour, texture, and other formal elements and
principles; see chapter 1 in Bryson (1981). A more psychoanalytically
charged version of the distinction can be found in Jean-François Lyotard’s
Discourse/Figure (2011).
15. The term ‘mantic’ – literally, ‘of or relating to divination or prophecy’ – is used
here in the sense suggested by Barbara Stafford (2011: 11), as a way of addres-
sing a kind of art that ‘does not re-represent what already exists; it presents
what is coming into being before the eyes’. A ‘mantic’ semiotic model priori-
tizes not intellectual interpretative readings but affective receiving and
revealing.
References
Angel, Leonard. 1994. Enlightenment East and West (Albany, NY: State University
of New York).
Arnheim, Rudolph. 1969. Visual Thinking. Berkeley: University of California
Press.
Baas, Jacquelynn. 2005. Smile of the Buddha: Eastern Philosophy and Western
Art from Monet to Today. Berkeley: University of California Press.
266 Simon Morley
Bersani, Leo, and Ulysse Dutoit. 1993. Arts of Impoverishment: Rothko, Renais,
Beckett. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Billeter, Jean-François. 2006. Contre François Jullien. Paris: Allia.
Bryson, Norman. 1981. Word and Image: French Painting of the Ancien Regime.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bryson, Norman. 1988. The gaze in the expanded field. In Vision and Visuality,
edited by Hal Foster, pp. 87–114. Seattle: Bay Press.
Cage, John. 1990. “Autobiographical statement,” [http://johncage.org/
autobiographical_statement.html], accessed 29 October 2015.
Capra, Fritjof. 1975. The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels between
Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism. Boulder, CO: Shambhala.
Downloaded by [University of East Anglia Library] at 04:46 13 December 2017
Chave, Anna. 1993. Agnes Martin: Humility, the beautiful daughter … all of her
ways are empty. In Agnes Martin, edited by Barbara Haskell, ex. cat., pp.
131–53. New York: Whitney Museum of American Art and Harry N. Abrams.
Clarke, J.J. 1997. Oriental Enlightenment: The Encounter between Asian and
Western Thought. London: Routledge.
Deleuze, Gilles. 1992. Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza, translated by Martin
Joughin. New York: Zone Books.
Fer, Briony. 2004. The Infinite Line: Re-Making Art after Modernism. New
Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Fer, Briony. 2005. Drawing drawing: Agnes Martin’s Infinit. In 3× An
Abstraction: New Methods of Drawing: Hilma Af Klint, Emma Kunz, and
Agnes Martin, edited by Catherine de Zegher and Hendel Teicher, ex. cat.,
pp. 168–87. New York: The Drawing Center.
Geaney, Jane. 2012. Self as container? Metaphors we lose by in understanding
early Chinese texts. Antiquorum Philosophia 5: 11–30.
Glimcher, Arne, ed. 2012. Agnes Martin: Paintings, Writings, Remembrances.
London: Phaidon.
Johnson, Mark. 2007. The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human
Understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jullien, François. 1999. The Propensity of Things: A History of Efficacy in China,
translated by Janet Lloyd. New York: Zone Books.
Jullien, François. 2000. Detour and Access: Strategies of Meaning in China and
Greece, translated by Sophie Hawkes. New York: Zone Books.
Jullien, François. 2004. In Praise of Blandness, translated by Janet Lloyd.
New York: Zone Books.
Jullien, François. 2009. The Great Image Has No Shape, or, On the Nonobject
through Painting, translated by Jane Marie Todd. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Kaufman, Thomas DaCosta. 2004. Toward a Geography of Art. Chicago: Chicago
University Press.
Krauss, Rosalind. 1993. The /Cloud/. In Agnes Martin, edited by Barbara Haskell, ex.
cat., pp. 155–65. New York: Whitney Museum of American Art and Harry
N. Abrams.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied
Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
World Art 267
Morgan, David. 1999. Visual Piety: A History and Theory of Popular Religious
Images. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Nishitani, Keiji. [1949] 1990. The Self-Overcoming of Nihilism, translated by
Graham Parkes with Setsuko Aihara. Albany, NY: State University of
New York Press.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 1996. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice of
Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pollock, Griselda. 2005. Agnes dreaming: Dreaming Agnes. In 3× An Abstraction:
New Methods of Drawing: Hilma Af Klint, Emma Kunz, and Agnes Martin,
edited by Catherine de Zegher and Hendel Teicher, ex. cat., pp. 159–82.
New York: The Drawing Center.
Princenthal, Nancy. 2015. Agnes Martin: Her Life and Art. London: Thames &
Hudson.
Rogers, Timothy Robert. 2009. Mapping an internal world: The art of Agnes
Martin and Florence Pierce. In Illumination: The Paintings of Georgia
O’Keeffe, Agnes Pelton, Agnes Martin, and Florence Miller Pierce, edited by
Karen Moss, ex. cat., pp. 89–101. Newport Beach, CA: Orange County
Museum of Art.
Slingerland, Edward. 2003. Effortless Action: Wu-wei as Conceptual Metaphor
and Spiritual Ideal in Early China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stafford, Barbara Maria. 2001. Visual Analogy: Consciousness as the Art of
Connecting. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stafford, Barbara Maria. 2011. Crystal and smoke: Putting image back in mind. In A
Field Guide to a New Meta-Field: Bridging the Humanities–Neuroscience Divide,
edited by Barbara Maria Stafford, pp. 1–63. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Suzuki, D.T. 1964. An Introduction to Zen Buddhism, New York: Grove Press, Inc.
Tresilian, Nicholas. 2011. Semantic reciprocity: Towards a neuroscience of cultural
change. In A Field Guide to a New Meta-Field: Bridging the Humanities–
Neuroscience Divide, edited by Barbara Maria Stafford, pp. 309–33. Chicago:
Chicago University Press.
Ueda, Shizuteru. 2011. Contributions to dialogue with the Kyoto School. In
Japanese and Continental Philosophy: Conversations with the Kyoto School,
edited by Brett W. Davis, Brian Schroeder, and Jason M. Wirth, pp. 19–32.
Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Versluis, Arthur. 1993. American Transcendentalism and Asian Religions.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
268 Simon Morley