Sie sind auf Seite 1von 1

University of San Carlos – Department of Chemical Engineering

CHE 524N Response to Reviewers Comments

Design Report Title: Effluent Remediation from Wafer Fabrication


Members: Del Mar, Janus King S.M.
Roldan, Charity B.
Suico, Ariel Danielle Anjelu D.
Tangpuz, Justine Shaira N.
Tenio, Demi Faerosa C.
Torrefiel, John Christopher A.
Date Revision Submitted: May 21, 2018
Revision No: 3
Term and Academic Year: 2nd Semester, AY 2017 - 2018

Reviewers Comment(s) and Satisfactory


Response and Revisions Remarks
Suggestion(s) Yes No
1. Hardness data is unchanged all Mass balance updated as the effect
throughout. of carbonates on the pH was
considered.
2. Reconsider MLSS, DO Updated values
concentration and oxygen transfer
rate of activate sludge system.
3. Description of hazardous waste Included in the process definition of
shed. the sludge dewatering process.
4. Add to plant layout: outfall Updated plant layout
location; transfer/lift station;
entrance/exit (emergency);
dimensions
5. Recalculation of cost-benefit Prices used in calculations done
analysis. with future worth instead of present
worth.
6. Recalculate amount of calcium Updated mass balances over
hydroxide needed. processes for entire scheme
7. Fluoroacetic acid, a weak acid, Dissociation of fluoroacetic acid
should not completely dissociate. based on its Ka value was
considered and pH was updated.
8. Mix sludge from oil and grease Updated block flow diagram
separator with primary sludge.
Other changes made
1. Addition of removal of suspended solids in oil and grease separator.
2. Addition of selection of oil and grease removal process.
3. Update input-output, block flow diagram, and stream summary.
4. Tin assumed to behave the same metals and removal efficiency assumed
the same in metal removal processes.
5. Addition of scum stream from primary clarifier.
6. Sizing of process equipment included.

Page 1 of 1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen