Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Student Guide
December 2004
Part # 10PO2-CCS-07712
D44640GC10
Edition 1.0
D45100
®
Copyright © 2004, 2006, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Disclaimer
This document contains proprietary information and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws. You may
copy and print this document solely for your own use in an Oracle training course. The document may not be modified or
altered in any way. Except where your use constitutes "fair use" under copyright law, you may not use, share, download,
upload, copy, print, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, post, transmit, or distribute this document in whole or in part
without the express authorization of Oracle.
The information contained in this document is subject to change without notice. If you find any problems in the document,
please report them in writing to: Oracle University, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, California 94065 USA. This
document is not warranted to be error-free.
If this documentation is delivered to the United States Government or anyone using the documentation on behalf of the
United States Government, the following notice is applicable:
Trademark Notice
Oracle, JD Edwards, PeopleSoft, and Siebel are registered trademarks of Oracle Corporation and/or its affiliates. Other
names may be trademarks of their respective owners.
Core Consultant Course: Case Study (Siebel 7.7)
Table of Contents
i
Core Consultant Course: Case Study (Siebel 7.7)
ii
Core Consultant Course: Case Study (Siebel 7.7) Training i.1
Module Agenda i
This module provides an introduction to the:
` Instructor and class participants
` Training site information
` Course:
Audience
Prerequisites
Goal
Objectives
Course Audience
This course is designed for implementation teams
` Application developers
` System architects and configurators
` Database administrators
` Systems administrators
Course Prerequisites i
Basic Windows or NT navigation and file management skills
Understanding of basic relational database concepts
Familiarity with application development
Familiarity with Web-based and client/server applications
Course Goal
The Core Consultant Course (CCC) is designed to provide
Siebel application integrators with:
` An introduction to Siebel applications
` Information on how to efficiently and effectively interact with the
Siebel Systems Global Services organizations
` The technical foundation necessary to implement Siebel
applications
` A simulated real-world case study
Course Objectives i
Use a standardized implementation methodology
Navigate the Siebel user interface
Describe the Siebel architecture
Install Siebel software to set up your enterprise
Secure access to Siebel applications and data
Define your company structure
Configure a Siebel application
Course Methodology
Subject matter is delivered via:
` Lecture and slide presentations
` Software demonstrations
` Class discussions
` Hands-on labs
Course Materials i
Student Guide
` All slides presented during lecture
` Notes that point to Siebel Bookshelf references
Lab Guide
` Hands-on lab exercises and solutions
1. 2. 3. 4.
Foundations Architecture Access Exploring
and Control and Siebel
Installation Organization Applications
Setup
5. 6. 7. 8.
Configuration Data Loads Business Deployment
9.
Implementation
Case Study
Course Agenda i
Foundations
` 1: Introducing Siebel Applications
` 2: Implementing Siebel Applications
` 3: Using the Siebel Client
` 4: Working with Data in the User Interface
Conclusion
Summary i
This module provides an introduction to the:
` Instructor and class participants
` Training site information
` Course:
Audience
Prerequisites
Goal
Objectives
Core
Core Consultant
Consultant Course:
Course:
Case
Case Study
Study (Siebel
(Siebel 7.7)
7.7)
Module Objectives
Instructor Supervision
Instructor involvement is limited
` Presents introduction and wrap-up modules
1
` Provides review sessions as needed
` Role-plays the business analyst representing the customer in daily
meetings with teams
` Acts as a technical consultant to assist with the Siebel
implementation
Challenges
Applying the course knowledge gained to a real-world
environment
1
` Undirected development
` Incomplete information to complete tasks
Extent of the effort
` One person cannot do all the work
` Divide the work and focus on getting your part done
Working with teammates
Available Resources
Implementation Case Study section of the Student Guide
` Material defining the requirements for the customer application
` Project-planning documents
1
Training materials from the Essentials (Siebel 7.7) course
Siebel Bookshelf
Siebel Sample application
Lab data files
` EIM (Enterprise Integration Manager) data files
Ground Rules
For the Case Study to be successful, participants must:
` Work cooperatively on their teams
1
` Attend and participate fully
Attend during business hours, as customer will not allow off-hours
access
` Apply due diligence in troubleshooting
Do homework before seeking instructor intervention
` Consult fellow team members
Summary
Core
Core Consultant
Consultant Course:
Course:
Case
Case Study
Study (Siebel
(Siebel 7.7)
7.7)
2
Module 2: Case Study
Introduction
Module Objectives
Configure
Focus of the
Case Study Build Validate
Deploy
Manage
Run Evaluate
Update
Module 2: Case Study Introduction 6 of 9
Summary
Core
Core Consultant
Consultant Course:
Course:
Case
Case Study
Study (Siebel
(Siebel 7.7)
7.7)
Module 3: Implementing a
Siebel Application 3
Module Objectives
Success Factors
Understand Functionality
Understand Functionality
Understand the functionality of the standard application
` Server
Workflow processes
Assignment Manager
` Client-side functionality managed by administrators
Workflow deployment
Access Control
` Can define at run time who has access to data
3
Summary
Background
Telecom Solutions and Products (TSP) has long been an industry leader in the production
and sale of telecommunications solutions and products. The product line ranges from
mobile and personal communications equipment to large telephone systems such as
Customers contact TSP by way of the call center toll-free telephone number. Customer
requests range from simple product inquiries and order placement to critical shipment
issues. Now that partners have joined TSP, their need for account information and new
leads has dramatically increased the inbound call volume at the call center.
Customers also request on-site sales consultations. At this point, a telesales agent works
through the issue with the customer and determines if a partner should be contacted for a
customer visit. The partner then contacts the customer and makes the necessary
scheduling arrangements over the phone for an on-site visit.
The goals of the on-site consultation are to analyze the existing equipment and to design
an integrated solution with the new TSP equipment. Partners are specialized solution
providers. They are also telecommunications solution experts in the areas in which they
operate, such as governmental telecommunications regulations, telephony, and Internet
TSP has determined that its relationship with its customers can be improved by providing
product information, pricing, and availability via the Web. TSP is determined to move
into the small-office and home-office (SOHO) market next year. In addition, research
shows that SOHO customers prefer to order products and services via the Web.
The company sees this opportunity as an exciting vehicle to provide their customers with
the information they want, when they want it. The initial rollout of the Web site will
remove some of the burden from the telesales agents. Its functionalities will include the
capability to:
• Browse catalog of products and services
• Enable Quote to Order
• Integrate partner visibility into the TSP system
Project Objective
The objective of this project is to utilize a Siebel application to provide a Siebel Call
Center and Siebel PRM proof of concept that executes TSP’s business processes. The
solution will incorporate TSP business processes into an efficient, coherent, and
manageable solution that can be standardized across each partner.
Project Scope
The business requirements for this proof of concept are derived from the Manage
Inbound Sales Call business process and two sub-processes. Any requirements that do not
trace back to these business processes are not to be considered for this project.
Overview
This proof of concept contains support for the following business units: Telesales, Sales,
and Partner Sales. It includes functionality such as:
• Account and contact management
• Opportunity management
Core Consultant Course: Case Study (Siebel 7.7) 3
Telecom Solutions and Products Project
• Quote management
• Order management
Deliverables
• A running Siebel CRM proof of concept with the required functionality, process
flow, and configuration changes
• Siebel installation checklist
• EIM data mapping spreadsheets
• Imported legacy data
• Assignment Manager rules
• Workflow processes
• A technical presentation of the Siebel application
Start Initiate
Call
Customer
New Sales Quote
Create
Quote
Validate
Consumer Validate Validate Update
Type of Match Contact Additional
Start Contact Contact Account End
Customer? (Detailed) Profile
Information Addresses Information
Information
Organization
Validate Validate
Match Account
Account Account
Request
Provide
Start Product
Responses
Recommendation
Customer
Ask Needs Yes Associate
Recommend Acceptable End
Analysis Products with
Products Offering?
Questions Opportunity
No
Sales Representative
Service Representative or
7 Core Consultant Course: Case Study (Siebel 7.7)
• Opportunities
• Profile
• Quotes
• Reports and Charts
Legacy Systems
A team of business analysts has worked with TSP to review its organizational structure.
The analysts have assisted TSP in defining the key divisions, organizations, and positions
necessary to implement a Siebel deployment. The following document captures their
decisions.
Organization Data for TSP
Organizations
Per Siebel Systems recommended practices, there should be a separate organization for
each of TSP’s partners. This allows for ease of assignment of leads and ensures that
visibility of lead data is restricted to a single partner. In addition, there will be a single
organization for TSP as a whole. By convention, the name of the organization will be that
of the company or partner.
Divisions
Divisions will be created to reflect the current TSP org chart as illustrated in the
following diagram. For simplicity, each partner will be created as a single division.
Positions
Positions will reflect the current TSP reporting hierarchy. TSP will create a Channel
Partner Manager position to manage the relationships with all of the partners. The
Channel Partner Manager (a TSP employee) will have a partner manager (a person at the
external partner organization) reporting to him or her. TSP will set up delegated
administration so that the partner managers or administrators can set up and manage the
positions within their respective firms. However, for the proof of concept release TSP
will create the partner positions directly because the current partners are rather small.
By convention, TSP will name each position for the partner organization so that it begins
with the name (or a shortened form of the name) of the partner. In this way, all the
positions for a partner will appear together in lists.
Partner Abbreviation
TelCon TC
PhoneTec Inc. PT
Awk Services Awk
Salmon River Associates SRA
Responsibilities
For the initial rollout, TSP will leverage standard responsibilities for most users and
create new responsibilities for its telesales reps and the sales reps at the partner
organizations. You will need to restrict their views to those they need to accomplish their
jobs.
TSP*
┌─────────┬─────────┴───┬────────────┐
Salmon River
Telcon* PhoneTec* Awk Services*
Associates*
A team of business analysts has worked with TSP to review the business processes for
this implementation and they have developed a set of detailed requirements that form the
basis for the proof of concept project. The requirements have been grouped into the
following major categories:
1. User Interface
Partner Manager
Partner managers will use the My Team’s Opportunities view to check for any new
opportunities assigned to their respective organization. They will then manually assign
the opportunity to a sales representative for follow-up.
The partner sales representative will follow up on all opportunities assigned to them
using the same screen flow that the TSP sales representatives use. The memo on the PRM
Partner Portal application at the end of this document details some minor differences
between the portal and call center applications that can result in a few changes to the
process flow.
Non-core Requirements
• TSP telesales representatives frequently need to review opportunity information
based on current revenue. For this proof of concept, TSP wants their telesales
representatives to be able to quickly query their opportunity list for accounts where
the current revenue is greater than $1,000,000.
• TSP has had problems in the past where opportunities have been incorrectly evaluated
based on their lead quality. For this implementation, TSP would like to ensure that
only the channel partner managers or managers at the partner organizations are able
to set lead quality to very high or excellent.
2. Data Organization
Product Lines
These specify the types of products that TSP sells either directly or through its partners.
They also represent the groupings of products that a given partner can sell on TSP’s
behalf. For the first release, TSP will offer the following product lines:
• Wireless products
• Cell phones
• Modems
• Office PBXs
• Hotel PBXs
Products
These specify the individual products that TSP sells directly or through its partners. In
general, a product can be assigned to one or more product lines. However, for the initial
release, TSP will assign a given product to a single product line only. A complete list of
product lines and products can be found in the legacy data files.
Partners
TSP has many partners that serve as its field sales (and service) force. Some partners
represent TSP for all its product lines (they are called TSP Partners), while others are
licensed to sell specific product lines. TSP classifies its partners into the three following
types:
• TSP Partner: licensed to represent all TSP product lines
• TSP Solution Distributor: licensed to represent TSP’s high-end products (hotel
and office PBX product lines)
• TSP Product Distributor: licensed to represent the individual product lines
(wireless products, cell phones, and modems)
Sales Regions
Region States
Northeast Massachusetts (MA), New York (NY)
Central Georgia (GA), Illinois (IL), Texas (TX)
West Colorado (CO), California (CA)
TSP currently has a policy of assigning partners and products so that in a given sales
region, a partner has the exclusive rights to represent TSP for that product line. In this
way, partners do not have to worry about competing for opportunities in the region. TSP
has been careful to make sure that there is at least one partner in each region for each
product line. TSP will roll out the initial release for the following four partners:
Price Lists
Price lists are typically not grouped in the same way that products are, in order to allow
greater flexibility. However, for the proof of concept, TSP will use a single price list to
ensure that customers are quoted the same price for a product regardless of who (TSP or a
specific partner) handles the sale. Account-specific discounts can then be applied by
TSP’s call center or the partner.
Non-core Requirements
TSP will be creating a new unified price list to support operations with the proof of
concept. Consequently, there is no need to import the current set of prices. TSP
administrators will enter the price list data for the proof of concept. For the purposes of
this implementation, it will be sufficient to create a Standard TSP price list and enter test
values in the price list for all TSP products.
One of our team members is very skilled in data mapping for Siebel implementations,
and she created a number of data files that you can use to directly import TSP’s legacy
data. Unfortunately, she did not have time to complete the mapping for accounts and
contacts, so you will need to do that. See her memo on importing data for further details.
Non-core Requirements
• TSP wants to be able to export account and contact records for integration with other
legacy systems. Ideally, the proof of concept would demonstrate that this can be
carried out quickly and efficiently. TSP would like to be able to identify records for
archive and delete in batch. For the proof of concept, identify some contacts for
deletion, set the Contact Status field to Marked for Deletion, and perform a batch
export and delete for these contacts.
• TSP employee data is available for the proof of concept. Should the consultant team
choose to implement it, TSP would like to see that employee data can be imported
and updated daily, weekly, or monthly (whichever their need is in a given instance)
from the external HR system.
4. Additional Configuration
The business analysts have identified the following changes to the as-delivered Siebel
Call Center application:
Non-core Requirements
• The as-delivered Siebel application provides automatic functionality that allows a
user to click any email hyperlink to send an email, or use F9 (Send Email) to send an
email to an email address. Be sure to verify that this functionality still exists when
you enable multiple email addresses for each content (requirement 4.E.).
• TSP believes the Activity Template functionality will meet their needs to standardize
activities associated with new opportunities. If possible, include this feature in the
proof of concept and demonstrate how telesales representatives can access the
template. Suggested activity types for the template are Meeting, Demonstration, and
Tech Support Follow Up.
Non-core Requirements
• TSP would like to automatically monitor any assigned opportunities where the Lead
Quality remains 6-Channel Partner for two days. When this occurs, a “No Action by
Partner” field in the opportunity should be set, and an activity record for the partner
manager should be created, indicating that no action has occurred for the opportunity.
This activity should be assigned to TSP’s Channel Partner Manager.
• TSP doesn’t necessarily anticipate that the assignment rules they’d like to implement
will result in conflicting assignments or ties between candidates. However, to
alleviate any assignment issues, they’d like to see that any conflicting assignments for
opportunities go to the Channel Partner Manager.
Installation Checklist
Item Value
Gateway Server Name
Gateway Server Installation Directory
Windows User Account Name
Windows User Account Password
Enterprise Server Name
Siebel Server Name
Planning Document
Use this as a guideline for planning which tasks should occur on which days this week.
Fill in the line in the table space with the person’s initials when the task is assigned.
Deliverable Day Type
1 2 3 4 5
Design
1 2 3 4 5
Completed Planning Document for Provided to
production pilot (this document) Student
Installation Checklist
Workflow Processes
Planning Document
Construction
1 2 3 4 5
Legacy data imported
• Product Lines
• Products
Technical presentation
Memorandum
To: TSP Team
From: Barbara Anne Leed
Re: Notes on PRM Partner Manager
• Register partners
• Create the partner users and add them to the
TSP position hierarchy
• Assign price lists to partners
• Define positions and responsibilities for
delegated administration by our partners
• Add partners to the appropriate access groups
After you’ve created partners, you can then use the Partner
Operations screen to monitor partners and the
opportunities, orders, and quotes on which they are
working.
Partner Administration
allows you to add the new partner to any access group that
you’ve created. You will want to use this to implement
catalog access control for products.
Memorandum
Memorandum
TSP CONFIDENTIAL
Memorandum
• Hotel - Resort
• Hotel - Business
• Small Office
• Home Office
• Other
TSP CONFIDENTIAL
Memorandum
TSP CONFIDENTIAL
Memorandum
simply unchecking the Lock Assignment field and not use the
Lead Quality field at all? We tried this and verified that
setting and unsetting the Lock Assignment field by itself
is not enough to trigger assignment. We think this is a
result of Assignment Manager not tracking the Lock
Assignment field (in fact, there is no way to create a
criteria based on that field in the Assignment Rules
screen). So, we are required to use this two-step procedure
to trigger assignment.
TSP CONFIDENTIAL
Memorandum
TSP CONFIDENTIAL