Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
shell
Udaybhan Rana | June 17, 2016
Contents
• Warpage in upper tank
• Warpage in lower tank
• Warpage mismatch analysis
• CPCL
• Root Cause Analysis
• Recommendations
• Conclusion
2
Warpage in Upper Tank
Dimensional reading are taken from white light scan test. In above graphs
mean is the average of the offset of each point from the nominal 3-D.
Microsoft Office
Similarly, maximum and minimum are the maximum and minimum offset Excel 97-2003 Worksheet
respectively..
For details, please see the embedded document.
3
Warpage in Lower Tank
• The corresponding dimensions of upper and lower tank that have mismatch in warpage
will be difficult to fit/align together.
• The points (PT, WS, PRF) that have mismatch have been discussed in the further slides.
PT Points:
Upper Tank
Lower Tank
WS points are
approximately on
corresponding
locations on lower
and upper tank.
By observing the
graph we see the
mismatch at the
locations shown in
the adjacent table.
The maximum
mismatch in
warpage of WS is
approximately 5
mms (as 6
6
highlighted in
PRF Points
10
8
6
4
2 Upper tank warp
0 Lower tank warp
-2
-4
-6
-8
By observing the
graph we see the
mismatch at the
locations shown in
the adjacent table.
The maximum
mismatch in
warpage of PRF
is approximately
7
9 mm (as 7
CPCL
• The dimensions for the tank have been checked for 30 random samples. The
inspection is done according to attached balloon drawings.
•. The inspected readings are recorded in the attached file. The readings
highlighted in red color are out of customer specification limits. Please review
the attached file.
8
Root Cause Analysis
MACHINE
Plastic omnium
tank shell
Improper thermal warpage
expansion material
molded in High melt temp Low injection
approved mold velocity
High mold temp
Low Hold time
Material is not
compatible Low Pack pressure
with injection
molding
Uneven cooling
process
MATERIAL METHOD
9
Recommendations
• Material should be changed, present material is compatible with
blow molding.
• We should look for water circuit design around the mold.
• Better coolant should be used.
• Uniform cooling should be maintained around the mold.
• Ensure temperature in both mold halves is equal.
• Increase cooling time , injection hold time.
• Monitor part ejection from mold, relocate ejector pins if needed.
• Part design problem, rib should be as shown. This helps in
reducing stresses.
10
10
Conclusion
11
11
Thank you.
12
12