1.[Feria v. CA (2000)
9048, a correction in the
2.[Cruz v. CA (2000)]
3.[Tijing v. CA]
4.[Ilusorio v. Bildner (2000)]
5.[Moncupa v. Enrile (1986)]
6.[Caunca v. Salazar]
7.[Olaguer v. Military Commission (1987)]
8.[Harden v. Director (1948)]
9.Galvez v. CA (1994)]
10.Chavez v. CA (1968)
11.Velasco vs. CA, GR 118644, July 7, 1995.
12.Dizon vs. Eduardo, 153 SCRA 470.
13.Elepante vs. Madayag, 196 SCRA 399.
14.A. M. No. 08-1-16-SC
January 22, 2008
15.(A.M. No. 07-9-12-SC), on 25 September
2007
16.Castillo vs. Cruz, 605 SCRA 628,
17.Canlas vs. NAPICO Homeowners, 554 SCRA
208
18.Reyes vs. CA, 626 SCRA 580
19.Razo, Jr., vs. Tagitis, GR 182498, June 22,
2010,
20.Rep. Act No. 9048 removed from the ambit
of Rule 108 of the Rules of Court the correction
of such errors. Rule 108 now applies only to
substantial CHANGES and corrections in entries
in the civil register.
21.Under Rep. Act No.
civil registry involving the CHANGE (not
correction) of sex is not a mere clerical or
typographical error. It is a substantial change
for which the applicable procedure is Rule 108
of the Rules of Court.
22.Republic vs. Jennifer Cagandahan, GR
166676, September 12, 2008.
23.Republic v. Valencia (G.R. No. L-32181 March
5, 1986)
24.Republic vs. Lim, [G.R. No. 153883. January
13, 2004]
25.Parco vs. CA
26.Paciente v. Dacuycuy
27.Gachitorena v. Sotelo
28.Yangco vs. CFI of Manila
29.Francisco vs. CA
30.Guerrero v. Teran
31.Araneta v. Perez (1962)
32.Tiangco v. Francisco (Trustee)
33.De Leon v. Molo-Peckson (1962) (Trustee)
34.Palma v. Cristobal (Trustee)
35.Salinas v. Tuazon (Trustee)
36.Hernandez v. San Juan-Santos, G.R. No.
166470, August 7, 2009, 595 SCRA 464.
(Guardianship)
37.Francisco v. Court of Appeals, G.R. 57438,
January 31, 1984, 127 SCRA 371. (Guardianship)
38.People v. Watiwat, G.R. No. 139400,
September 3, 2003, 410 SCRA 324.
(Guardianship)
39.Gorostiaga v. Sarte, 68 Phil. 4 (1939).
(Guardianship)
40.Uy v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 109557,
November 29, 2000, 346 SCRA
247(Guardianship)
41.Catalan et. al., v. Basa, G.R. No. 159567, July
31, 2007, 528 SCRA 645. (Guardianship)
42.Francisco v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
57438, January 3, 1984, 127 SCRA 371
(Guardianship)
51.Republic of the Philippines v. Court of
Appeals and Maximo Wong, G.R. No. 97906,
May 21, 1992, 209 SCRA 189. Adoption
52.In the Matter of Adoption of Stephanie
Nathy Astorga, G.R. No. 148311, March 31,
2005, 454 SCRA 541. Adoption
53.Lahom v. Sibulo, G.R. No.143989, July 14,
2003, 406 SCRA 135. Adoption
54.Landingin v. Republic, G.R. No. 164948, June
27, 2006, 493 SCRA 415. Adoption

43.Vancil v. Belmes, G.R. No. 132233, June 19,

2001, 358 SCRA 707 (Guardianship)

44.Gonzales v. Aguinaldo, G.R. No. 74769,

September 28, 1990, 190 SCRA 112
(Guardianship)

45.In the matter of the guardianship of Carmen

Padilla Vda. De Bengson v. Philippine National
Bank, G.R. No. 17066, December 28, 1961, 3
SCRA 751. (Guardianship)

46.Sikat v. Vda. De Villanueva, 57 Phil. 486

(1932). (Statute of Non-Claims)

47.Sanchez v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.

108947, September 29, 1997, 279 SCRA 647
(Inventory)

48.Heirs of Pedro Escanlar v. Court of Appeals,

G.R. No. 119777, October 23, 1997, 281 SCRA
176. (Sale of Estate)

49.Orola v. Pontevedra, G.R. No.158566,

September 20, 2005, 470 SCRA 352. (Mortage
of Estate)

50.In the matter of escheat proceedings of the

estate of the deceased Anne Fallon Murphy and
Tomas Fallon married to Julia Fallon v. Bezore,
et al., G.R. No. L-14157, October 26, 1960
Escheat