Sie sind auf Seite 1von 10

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The relationship between duration of


psoriasis, vascular inflammation, and
cardiovascular events
Alexander Egeberg, MD, PhD,a Lone Skov, MD, PhD, DMSc,a Aditya A. Joshi, MD,b Lotus Mallbris, MD, PhD,c
Gunnar H. Gislason, MD, PhD,d,e,f Jashin J. Wu, MD,g Justin Rodante, PA-C,b Joseph B. Lerman, MD,b
Mark A. Ahlman, MD,b Joel M. Gelfand, MD, MSCE,h and Nehal N. Mehta, MD, MSCEb
Hellerup and Copenhagen, Denmark; Bethesda, Maryland; Stockholm, Sweden;
Los Angeles, California; and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Background: Psoriasis is associated with risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) and a major adverse
CV event (MACE). Whether psoriasis duration affects risk of vascular inflammation and MACEs has not been
well characterized.

Objectives: We utilized two resources to understand the effect of psoriasis duration on vascular disease
and CV events: (1) a human imaging study and (2) a population-based study of CVD events.

From the Department of Dermatology and Allergya and Depart- (to the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania) from Abbvie,
ment of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Janssen, Novartis Corp, Regeneron, Sanofi, Celgene, and Pfizer
Copenhagen, Hellerupd; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Inc; and he has received payment for CME work related to
Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesdab; Unit of psoriasis that was supported indirectly by Lilly and Abbvie. Dr
Dermatology and Venerology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholmc; Gelfand is a coepatent holder of resiquimod for treatment of
Danish Heart Foundation, Copenhagene; National Institute of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Dr Mehta is a full-time US gov-
Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagenf; ernment employee and receives research grants to the NHLBI
Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angelesg; from AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis and Celgene. No other potential
and Department of Dermatology, Department of Biostatistics conflicts of interest were declared by the authors.
and Epidemiology, and Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Dr Egeberg (Danish cohort) and Dr Mehta (National Institutes of
Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.h Health cohort) had full access to all of the data in the study and
The work at the National Institutes of Health cohort was take responsibility for integrity of the data and accuracy of the
supported by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute data analysis. Drs Egeberg, Skov, Mallbris, Gislason, Gelfand,
Intramural Research Program (HL006193-02). Dr Gelfand’s role and Mehta are responsible for the study concept and design.
in this study was supported by National Institute of Arthritis Drs Joshi, Ahlman, Rodante, Lerman, Gelfand, and Mehta
and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases grant K24-AR064310. (National Institutes of Health cohort) and Drs Egeberg and
Disclosure: Dr Egeberg has received research funding from Pfizer Gislason (Danish cohort) are responsible for acquisition, anal-
and Eli Lilly and honoraria as consultant and/or speaker from ysis, and interpretation of data. Drs Egeberg and Mehta are
Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Galderma, and Janssen Pharmaceuti- responsible for drafting of the manuscript. All authors the are
cals. Dr Skov has been a paid speaker for Pfizer, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, responsible for critical revision of the manuscript for important
Novartis, and LEO Pharma and has been a consultant or served intellectual content. Drs Egeberg, Gislason and Joshi are
on advisory boards with Pfizer, AbbVie, Janssen Cilag, Novartis, responsible for statistical analysis. Dr Mehta obtained funding.
Eli Lilly, LEO Pharma, and Sanofi; she has served as an Drs Egeberg, Skov, Gislason, and Mehta are responsible for
investigator for Pfizer, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Amgen, administrative, technical, or material support, and Drs Egeberg
Regeneron, and LEO Pharma and received research and and Mehta are responsible for study supervision.
educational grants from Pfizer, AbbVie, Novartis, Sanofi, Jans- Accepted for publication June 12, 2017.
sen Cilag, and Leo Pharma. Dr Mallbris is currently employed by Reprints not available from the authors.
Eli Lilly. Dr Gislason is supported by an unrestricted research Correspondence to: Alexander Egeberg, MD, PhD, Department of
scholarship from the Novo Nordisk Foundation and reports Dermatology and Allergy, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital,
research grants from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, University of Copenhagen, Kildegsity of 28, Hellerup 2900,
Bayer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Wu has received research Denmark. E-mail: alexander.egeberg@gmail.com; and Nehal N.
funding from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingel- Mehta, MD, MSCE, Section of Inflammation and Cardiometabolic
heim, Coherus Biosciences, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Diseases, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, 10 Center Dr,
Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sandoz, and Sun Pharmaceutical Bethesda, MD 20892. E-mail: nehal.mehta@nih.gov.
Industries; he is a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Published online August 17, 2017.
Dermira, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Sun Pharmaceutical 0190-9622/$36.00
Industries. In the previous 12 months Dr Gelfand has served as Ó 2017 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published
a consultant for and received honoraria from Coherus (data by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
safety and monitoring board), Dermira, Janssen Biologics, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2017.06.028
Merck (data safety and monitoring board), Novartis Corp,
Regeneron, Sanofi and Pfizer Inc; he receives research grants

1
2 Egeberg et al J AM ACAD DERMATOL
n 2017

Methods: First, patients with psoriasis (N = 190) underwent fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission
tomography/computed tomography (duration effect reported as a b-coefficient). Second, MACE risk was
examined by using nationwide registries (adjusted hazard ratios in patients with psoriasis (n = 87,161)
versus the general population (n = 4,234,793).

Results: In the human imaging study, patients were young, of low CV risk by traditional risk scores, and
had a high prevalence of cardiometabolic diseases. Vascular inflammation by fludeoxyglucose F 18
positron emission tomography/computed tomography was significantly associated with disease duration
(b = 0.171, P = .002). In the population-based study, psoriasis duration had strong relationship with MACE
risk (1.0% per additional year of psoriasis duration [hazard ratio, 1.010; 95% confidence interval, 1.007-
1.013]).

Limitations: These studies utilized observational data.

Conclusion: We found detrimental effects of psoriasis duration on vascular inflammation and MACE,
suggesting that cumulative duration of exposure to low-grade chronic inflammation may accelerate
vascular disease development and MACEs. Providers should consider inquiring about duration of disease to
counsel for heightened CVD risk in psoriasis. ( J Am Acad Dermatol http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.jaad.2017.06.028.)

Key words: cardiovascular disease; 18-FDG PET/CT; inflammation; psoriasis.

Patients with psoriasis those set forth by the National


have an increased incidence CAPSULE SUMMARY Institute of Health (NIH)
and prevalence of cardiovas- Radiation Safety Commission
cular (CV) risk factors1 d Patients with psoriasis have an increased and in the Belmont Report
and CV disease (CVD).2-5 incidence and prevalence of (National Commission for the
Vascular inflammation by flu- cardiovascular risk factors and Protection of Human Subjects
deoxyglucose F 18 (18-FDG) cardiovascular disease. of Biomedical and Behavioral
positron emission tomogra- d We found a 1% increase in future Research) were followed. All
phy/computed tomography cardiovascular event risk per additional study participants in the NIH
(18-FDG PET/CT), which year of disease duration. cohort provided written
is prognostic for future informed consent. Study
d Health care providers should consider
CV events, is increased in approval was obtained from
inquiring about duration of psoriasis
patients with psoriasis.6-8 the Danish Data Protection
when assessing cardiovascular risk.
Cumulative exposure to Agency (ref. 2007-58-0015,
inflammation is linked to int. ref. GEH-2014-018, I-Suite
increased atherosclerosis and CV events, suggesting 02736). Review of an ethics committee is not required
that longer disease duration might increase the risk for register studies in Denmark.
for CVD and CV events. Thus, disease duration may
represent a potentially easily obtainable measure of Data sources
risk for CVD in inflammatory-based diseases. Data for the cohort study at the National
We investigated whether longer duration of pso- Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute were obtained under
riasis would increase vascular inflammation and a the protocol titled Psoriasis, Atherosclerosis, and
major adverse CV event (MACE) on account of the Cardiometabolic Disease Initiative (NCT01778569).
longer exposure to chronic, low-grade systemic Complete and accurate data (including medical con-
inflammation observed in psoriasis. ditions, pharmacotherapy, treatment interventions
and surgical procedures, income, and vital statistics)
MATERIALS AND METHODS on the Danish population are available from nation-
Detailed descriptions of study approvals, data wide registers, which can be linked at the individual
sources, and methods are available online.9 Study level.
approval for the interventional cohort study was
obtained from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Study populations
Institute (NHLBI) Institutional Review Board in NIH cohort. The longitudinal cohort study
accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All group (referred to as the National Institutes of
Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Health [NIH] cohort) comprised 190 consecutive
J AM ACAD DERMATOL Egeberg et al 3
VOLUME jj, NUMBER j

Abbreviations used:
CV: cardiovascular
CVD: cardiovascular disease
CI: confidence interval
18-FDG: fludeoxyglucose F 18
18-FDG PET/CT: fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron
emission tomography/
computed tomography
HR: hazard ratio
MACE: major adverse cardiovascular
event
MI: myocardial infarction
NIH: National Institutes of Health
PUVA: psoralen plus ultraviolet A
SD: standard deviation
TBR: target-to-background ratio
UVB: ultraviolet B Fig 1. Nelson-Aalen cumulative hazards graph of the
population cohort. Major adverse cardiovascular event
risk in patients with psoriasis stratified on the basis of
patients with psoriasis who were recruited from disease duration less (n = 57,941) or more than 10 years
January 2013 through June 2016. A dermatologist or (n = 29,220) compared with in the general population
(n = 4,234,793).
a certified physician confirmed the onset and
duration of psoriasis and assessed psoriasis severity
using the Psoriasis Area Severity Index and body
[MI], ischemic stroke, and CV death, respectively).
surface area scores. Clinical parameters, including
Secondary outcomes included specific occur-
blood pressure, height, weight, waist and hip
rences of MI, ischemic stroke, and death due to
circumferences, were measured. Laboratory param-
CV.
eters, including fasting blood glucose, fasting lipid
panel, white blood count with differential, and
Covariates
systemic inflammatory markers (including high-
NIH cohort. Baseline treatment for the NIH
sensitivity C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedi-
cohort was defined for any of the following thera-
mentation rate) were evaluated in a clinical labora-
pies: systemic nonbiologic agents (henceforth sys-
tory. All patients underwent 18-FDG PET/CT scans
temic) or biologic therapy (systemic steroids,
for quantification of vascular inflammation.6-8
methotrexate, adalimumab, etanercept, and usteki-
Total Danish population cohort. The total
numab), statins, psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA)
Danish population cohort (henceforth population
or ultraviolet B (UVB), and topical treatments.
cohort) comprised all Danish citizens who were age
Patients completed survey-based questionnaires
18 years or older, alive, and residing in Denmark on
regarding smoking, previous CVD, family history of
January 1, 2008 (the study start).
CVD, and previous established diagnoses of hyper-
tension and diabetes. Patient responses were then
Outcomes ascertained by interview with the physician. All
NIH cohort. The primary outcome in the NIH parameters were assessed up to 12 months before
cohort was target-to-background ratio (TBR) as- study inclusion.
sessed by 18-FDG PET/CT (Siemens Biograph mCT Population cohort. Baseline treatment up to
PET/CT 64-slice scanner, Siemens Healthcare, 6 months before study inclusion was defined for
Malvern, PA). 18-FDG uptake within the aorta was the following therapies: biologics (adalimumab,
measured by utilizing dedicated analysis software efalizumab, etanercept, infliximab, and ustekinu-
for PET/CT (Extended Brilliance Workspace mab), cholesterol-lowering drugs, cyclosporine,
[Phillips Healthcare, Andover, MA]). One value of methotrexate, PUVA/UVB, retinoids (acitretin/etreti-
TBR was used as the primary outcome for each nate), and topical vitamin D analogues. Baseline
patient. The association between vascular inflam- comorbidity was assessed up to 5 years before study
mation and MACEs was not examined. Detailed inclusion for the following conditions: alcohol
description of TBR calculation is provided in our abuse, smoking, CVD, diabetes, hypertension, and
previous work.8 psoriatic arthritis. We calculated age-standardized
Population cohort. The primary outcome in socioeconomic status on the basis of average gross
the population cohort was the first occurrence of a annual income during the 5-year period before study
MACE (ie, a composite of myocardial infarction inclusion.
4 Egeberg et al J AM ACAD DERMATOL
n 2017

Table I. Baseline characteristics of the total population cohort


Reference population Psoriasis
Characteristic (n = 4,234,793) (n = 87,161)
Age, mean (SD), y 48.6 (18.0) 53.8 (16.3)
Sex, n (%)
Women 2,148,653 (50.7) 45,809 (52.6)
Men 2,086,140 (49.3) 41,352 (47.4)
Duration of psoriasis, y
Mean (SD) NA 7.8 (5.2)
Median (IQR) NA 7.7 (3.9-11.2)
Age at onset of psoriasis, mean (SD), y NA 46.0 (16.6)
Socioeconomic status, mean (SD) 2.0 (1.3) 2.2 (1.3)
Hospitalized (inpatient) for psoriasis, n (%) NA 4975 (5.7)
Smoking, n (%) 337,551 (8.0) 10,459 (12.0)
Comorbidity, n (%)
Alcohol abuse 58,671 (1.4) 1672 (1.9)
Cardiovascular disease 364,023 (8.6) 11,737 (13.5)
Diabetes 151,043 (3.6) 5376 (6.2)
Hypertension 506,836 (12.0) 15,908 (18.3)
Psoriatic arthritis 2515 (0.1) 5742 (6.6)
Treatment, n (%)*
Biologics 2760 (0.1) 663 (0.8)
Cholesterol-lowering drugs 384,425 (9.1) 12,436 (14.3)
Cyclosporine 985 (0.0) 193 (0.2)
Methotrexate 13,971 (0.3) 3189 (3.7)
PUVA/UVB phototherapy 346 (0.0) 264 (0.3)
Retinoids (acitretin/etretinate) 395 (0.0) 553 (0.6)
Topical vitamin D analogues NA 12,621 (14.5)

IQR, Interquartile range; NA, not applicable; PUVA, psoralen plus ultraviolet A; SD, standard deviation; UVB, ultraviolet B.
*Within the last 6 months.

Statistical analysis These analyses were adjusted for age at onset of


Results were presented with 95% confidence psoriasis, sex, and traditional CV risk assessed by
intervals (CIs) where applicable, and P values less Framingham risk score, history of CVD, diabetes,
than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. hypertension, treatment with statins, smoking, and
Statistical analyses were performed with STATA alcohol abuse. We assessed the F statistics along with
software (versions 12.0 and 13.0, StataCorp, P values as well as the root mean squared error
College Station, TX) and SAS software (version 9.4, values to assess for the goodness of fit for every
SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC). model.
Summary statistics were presented as means with Population cohort. Incidence rates were sum-
the standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed marized per 1000 person-years, and Cox regression
variables, medians, and interquartile range for non- was performed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs).
normally distributed continuous variables and fre- Multivariable models were adjusted for age, sex,
quencies for categorical variables. Normality was socioeconomic status, previous CVD, smoking,
assessed by skewness and kurtosis. Parametric alcohol abuse, diabetes, hypertension, and use of
variables were compared between groups using statins. We performed separate sensitivity analyses,
the Student t test and the Mann-Whitney U test from which patients with psoriatic arthritis and
was performed for nonparametric variables. those with previous CVD, respectively, were
Dichotomous variable comparisons were done using excluded. We performed additional analyses in
Pearson’s chi-square test. which psoriasis was defined by using only hospital
NIH cohort. Unadjusted regression analyses diagnoses. Moreover, we did analyses in which the
were performed to evaluate for potential relation- population cohort was divided into older (born
ships between cardiometabolic variables and psori- before 1960) and younger (born in or after 1960)
asis duration. We conducted multivariable linear individuals, respectively. Lastly, we repeated our
regression analyses to evaluate the associations of analyses with adjustment for age at onset of
vascular inflammation (TBR) with psoriasis duration. psoriasis.
J AM ACAD DERMATOL Egeberg et al 5
VOLUME jj, NUMBER j

Table II. Univariable and multivariable hazard ratios of MACEs in patients with psoriasis compared with in the
general population
Univariable Multivariable
Characteristic Hazard ratio 95% CI P value Hazard ratio 95% CI P value
Duration of psoriasis 1.039 1.036-1.042 \.0001 1.010 1.007-1.013 \.0001
Age 1.087 1.087-1.087 \.0001 1.075 1.075-1.076 \.0001
Male sex 1.230 1.218-1.242 \.0001 1.516 1.501-1.532 \.0001
Socioeconomic status
0 (lowest) 1.722 1.695-1.748 \.0001 1.118 1.101-1.136 \.0001
1 (below average) 2.355 2.321-2.389 \.0001 1.113 1.096-1.130 \.0001
2 (average) (reference) (reference)
3 (above average) 0.536 0.526-0.547 \.0001 0.855 0.838-0.873 \.0001
4 (highest) 0.478 0.468-0.488 \.0001 0.744 0.729-0.760 \.0001
Previous CVD 8.667 8.581-8.755 \.0001 2.278 2.252-2.305 \.0001
Statin use 3.594 3.556-3.631 \.0001 0.908 0.897-0.919 \.0001
Diabetes 3.743 3.692-3.795 \.0001 1.420 1.399-1.441 \.0001
Hypertension 5.721 5.665-5.778 \.0001 1.394 1.379-1.411 \.0001
Alcohol abuse 1.612 1.565-1.659 \.0001 1.905 1.850-1.961 \.0001
Smoking 2.654 2.620-2.689 \.0001 1.697 1.676-1.720 \.0001

CVD, Cardiovascular disease; CI, confidence interval.

Fig 2. Association between vascular inflammation and psoriasis disease duration in the
National Institutes of Health cohort. Unadjusted and fully adjusted regression plots demonstrate
a direct association between psoriasis disease duration and vascular inflammation in the
National Institutes of Health cohort beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors.

RESULTS 2.77), but at low CV risk by Framingham risk score.


NIH cohort Vascular inflammation assessed by TBR (mean 6
The NIH cohort comprised 190 patients with mild- SD = 1.70 6 0.26) demonstrated increased vascular
to-moderate psoriasis (Supplemental Table I; avail- inflammation.10 Strong associations with vascular
able at http://www.jaad.org), who were primarily inflammation were seen for male sex, smoking,
middle-aged men (57% men), overweight, with mild Framingham 10-year risk, and body mass index
insulin resistance (median insulin resistance of (BMI). The per-year incremental effect of psoriasis
6 Egeberg et al J AM ACAD DERMATOL
n 2017

duration on vascular inflammation (assessed patients with psoriasis.16-18 These insults could occur
by TBR) showed that duration of psoriasis was because of consistent vascular damage consequent
associated with increased vascular inflammation to immune activation in those with longer duration
(b = 0.086, P = .040), a relationship that persisted of disease.
beyond adjustment for traditional CV risk factors We opted for a translational epidemiologic
(b = 0.171, P = .002) (Fig 1 and Supplemental Tables approach, utilizing a human imaging study com-
II and III; available at http://www.jaad.org). bined with observational registry data to emphasize
the putative clinical relevance of increased vascular
Population cohort inflammation observed in our study. Specifically, we
The population cohort comprised 4,321,954 in- found a 1% increase in future CV event risk per
dividuals, including 87,161 patients with psoriasis additional year of disease duration, which is an effect
(maximum disease duration was 31.1 years) size similar to that of smoking. Each of the compo-
(Table I). During a mean (6SD) follow-up of 4.7 nents of the composite outcome of MACEs also
(0.9) years, MACEs were experienced by a total of increased with longer duration of disease, suggesting
152,122 patients in the general population (inci- that duration of inflammation increases all vascular
dence rate/1,000 person-years, 7.56 [95% CI, 7.52- diseaseerelated events. Nevertheless, we emphasize
7.60]) and 4472 patients with psoriasis (incidence that the independent association between psoriasis
rate/1,000 person-years, 10.94; [95% CI, 10.62- and CVD remains a topic of ongoing debate,19 as
11.26]), respectively. does the effect of systemic therapy on the vascular
In unadjusted analyses, psoriasis was associated inflammation and CV events.20
with 3.9% increased risk for MACEs per additional A limitation in the population cohort was a lack of
year of disease duration, and in multivariable anal- information for BMI and levels of physical exercise.
ysis, the risk of MACEs increased by 1.0% per However, such data were available in the NIH
additional year of psoriasis duration (HR, 1.010; cohort, and adjustment for BMI did not significantly
95% CI, 1.007-1.013) (Table II and Fig 2). For change the relationship between duration of disease
secondary end points, the multivariable HRs associ- and vascular inflammation. Furthermore, previous
ated with duration of psoriasis were 1.006 (95% CI, CVD and diabetes, which are two major predictors of
1.001-1.012) for MI, 1.011 (95% CI, 1.007-1.016) for MACEs in the population cohort, did not relate to
ischemic stroke, and 1.011 (95% CI, 1.007-1.015) for vascular inflammation in the NIH cohort. This is
CV death, respectively. likely due to the low number of patients with these
characteristics in the NIH cohort. Important strengths
DISCUSSION include the sheer number of participants and the
We utilized a human imaging study and a high accuracy of the nationwide registries, which
population-based study to investigate whether the minimized bias due to sex, age, concurrent medica-
duration of psoriasis increases the risk for CVD and tion, and socioeconomic status. Observational data
MACEs, and we have presented novel and convincing alone from a single study are not sufficient to
evidence to suggest a detrimental effect of psoriasis establish causality. However, comparable findings
duration on CVD beyond traditional CV risk factors, across different populations, which were obtained
even in patients with low CV risk scores. Notably, by using our approach of both observational and
every 1 SD increase in duration of psoriasis increases vascular imaging data, add strength and credibility to
the TBR by 2.5%, which roughly translates into an our findings, and the results are consistent with prior
absolute increase of 10% in future adverse events on work demonstrating that duration of psoriasis is an
the basis of a recent large population study.11 independent risk factor for MI and coronary artery
As in the case of studies of rheumatoid arthritis,12 disease measured by angiography.21,22
most but not all studies have associated psoriasis In conclusion, we have provided strong novel
with an increased risk for CVD,2-5,13-15 yet data evidence that duration of psoriasis increases vascular
suggest that classic CV risk factors alone do not fully inflammation and the risk of MACEs. Providers
capture this heightened risk, and systemic inflam- should consider inquiring about duration of psoriasis
mation has been put forward as a potential expla- when assessing CV risk stratification.
nation for the link between psoriasis and CVD. Along
this line, inflammation is associated with impaired REFERENCES
1. Neimann AL, Shin DB, Wang X, Margolis DJ, Troxel AB,
insulin sensitivity, carotid intima-media thickening, Gelfand JM. Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in
endothelial dysfunction, aortic stiffness, vascular patients with psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55:829-835.
inflammation, and coronary plaque burden, with 2. Gelfand JM, Azfar RS, Mehta NN. Psoriasis and cardiovascular
such CVD markers occurring more frequently in risk: strength in numbers. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130:919-922.
J AM ACAD DERMATOL Egeberg et al 7
VOLUME jj, NUMBER j

3. Gelfand JM, Mehta NN, Langan SM. Psoriasis and cardiovas- with rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of observational
cular risk: strength in numbers, part II. J Invest Dermatol. 2011; studies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:1524-1529.
131:1007-1010. 13. Egeberg A, Thyssen JP, Jensen P, Gislason GH, Skov L. Risk of
4. Gelfand JM, Neimann AL, Shin DB, Wang X, Margolis DJ, myocardial infarction in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic
Troxel AB. Risk of myocardial infarction in patients with arthritis: a nationwide cohort study. Acta Derm Venereol. 2017.
psoriasis. JAMA. 2006;296:1735-1741. http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/00015555-2657. E-pub ahead of print.
5. Mehta NN, Azfar RS, Shin DB, Neimann AL, Troxel AB, 14. Parisi R, Rutter MK, Lunt M, et al. Psoriasis and the risk of major
Gelfand JM. Patients with severe psoriasis are at increased cardiovascular events: cohort study using the Clinical Practice
risk of cardiovascular mortality: cohort study using the Research Datalink. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135:2189-2197.
General Practice Research Database. Eur Heart J. 2010;31: 15. Dowlatshahi EA, Kavousi M, Nijsten T, et al. Psoriasis is not
1000-1006. associated with atherosclerosis and incident cardiovascular
6. Mehta NN, Yu Y, Saboury B, et al. Systemic and vascular events: the Rotterdam Study. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;133:
inflammation in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis as 2347-2354.
measured by [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission 16. Boehncke WH, Boehncke S, Tobin AM, Kirby B. The ’pso-
tomography-computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT): a pilot riatic march’: a concept of how severe psoriasis may drive
study. Arch Dermatol. 2011;147:1031-1039. cardiovascular comorbidity. Exper Dermatol. 2011;20:
7. Mehta NN, Torigian DA, Gelfand JM, Saboury B, Alavi A. 303-307.
Quantification of atherosclerotic plaque activity and vascular 17. Balci DD, Balci A, Karazincir S, et al. Increased carotid artery
inflammation using [18-F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emis- intima-media thickness and impaired endothelial function in
sion tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT). J Vis psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009;23:1-6.
Exp. 2012:e3777. 18. Gyldenlove M, Storgaard H, Holst JJ, Vilsboll T, Knop FK,
8. Naik HB, Natarajan B, Stansky E, et al. Severity of psoriasis Skov L. Patients with psoriasis are insulin resistant. J Am Acad
associates with aortic vascular inflammation detected by FDG Dermatol. 2015;72:599-605.
PET/CT and neutrophil activation in a prospective observa- 19. Ogdie A, Troxel AB, Mehta NN, Gelfand JM. Psoriasis and
tional study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35:2667-2676. cardiovascular risk: strength in numbers. Part 3. J Invest
9. Egeberg, Alexander (2017). ‘‘JAAD-D-17-00307 Supplementary Dermatol. 2015;135:2148-2150.
Materials’’, Mendeley Data, v2. http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/ 20. Bissonnette R, Harel F, Krueger JG, et al. TNF-alpha antagonist
t7syfrg4yr.2. and vascular inflammation in patients with psoriasis vulgaris: a
10. Fayad ZA, Mani V, Woodward M, et al. Safety and efficacy of randomized placebo-controlled study. J Invest Dermatol. 2017.
dalcetrapib on atherosclerotic disease using novel http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2017.02.977 [E-pub ahead of
non-invasive multimodality imaging (dal-PLAQUE): a rando- print].
mised clinical trial. Lancet. 2011;378:1547-1559. 21. Li WQ, Han JL, Manson JE, et al. Psoriasis and risk of nonfatal
11. Figueroa AL, Abdelbaky A, Truong QA, et al. Measurement of cardiovascular disease in U.S. women: a cohort study. Br J
arterial activity on routine FDG PET/CT images improves Dermatol. 2012;166:811-818.
prediction of risk of future CV events. JACC Cardiovasc 22. Armstrong AW, Harskamp CT, Ledo L, Rogers JH,
Imaging. 2013;6:1250-1259. Armstrong EJ. Coronary artery disease in patients with psori-
12. Avina-Zubieta JA, Thomas J, Sadatsafavi M, Lehman AJ, asis referred for coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109:
Lacaille D. Risk of incident cardiovascular events in patients 976-980.
7.e1 Egeberg et al J AM ACAD DERMATOL
n 2017

Supplemental Table I. Demographic and


clinical characteristics of the NIH cohort (N = 190)
Parameter Value
Demographic and clinical history
Median age, y 50 6 12.6
Age at onset, y 29.4 6 15.7
Males, n (%) 109 (57%)
Hypertension, n (%) 54 (28%)
Type 2 diabetes, n (%) 19 (10%)
Hyperlipidemia, n (%) 89 (47%)
Current smoker, n (%) 19 (10%)
Metabolic syndrome, n (%) 48 (25%)
Statin use, n (%) 63 (33%)
Clinical and laboratory parameters
Body mass index, kg/m2 29.5 6 6
Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg 122.7 6 14.9
Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg 72.2 6 10
Total cholesterol level, mg/dL 181.9 6 36.7
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 102.0 6 30.4
level, mg/dL
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol 55.6 6 17.5
level, mg/dL
Median triglyceride level (IQR), mg/dL 101 (76-137)
Median Hs-CRP level (IQR), mg/L 2.0 (0.8-4.2)
Median Framingham risk score (IQR) 3 (1-6)
Glucose level, mg/dL 101 6 19.5
Median insulin level (IQR), mIU/L 11.1 (7.1-17.7)
Median HOMA-IR (IQR) 2.77 (1.65-4.49)
Psoriasis characteristics
Median disease duration (IQR), y 20 (9-30)
Median body surface area % affected 4.3 (2.4-13.3)
(IQR)
Median Psoriasis Area Severity Index 5.7 (2.9-10.1)
score (IQR)
Systemic/biologic therapy, N (%) 72 (38%)
Aortic vascular inflammation
Target-to-background ratio 1.70 6 0.26

All values reported as mean 6 SD or median (interquartile range)


for continuous variables and as n (%) for categorical variables. P
values represent comparison between groups by disease duration
and were calculated by the Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test
for continuous variables and by Pearson’s chi-square test for
categorical variables.
Hs-CRP, High-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HOMA-IR, homeostatic
model assessment of insulin resistance; IQR, interquartile range;
NIH, National Institutes of Health; SD, standard deviation.
J AM ACAD DERMATOL Egeberg et al 7.e2
VOLUME jj, NUMBER j

Supplemental Table II. Univariable regression


analyses between target-to-background ratio and
study variables in the NIH cohort
Target-to-background
Parameter ratio
Demographic and clinical history
Age at onset 0.172 (.02)
Males 0.266 (\.001)
Hypertension 0.165 (\.001)
Type 2 diabetes 0.014 (.734)
Hyperlipidemia 0.257 (\.001)
Current smoking 0.133 (.002)
Metabolic syndrome 0.344 (\.001)
Waist-to-hip ratio 0.047 (.293)
Tobacco use 0.169 (\.001)
Alcohol abuse 0.014 (.734)
Statin use 0.145 (.001)
Previous CVD 0.075 (.077)
Clinical and laboratory parameters
BMI 0.545 (\.001)
SBP 0.220 (\.001)
DBP 0.111 (.008)
Total cholesterol level 0.072 (.086)
LDL level 0.106 (.012)
HDL level 0.373 (\.001)
Triglyceride level 0.201 (\.001)
FRS 0.406 (\.001)
Glucose level 0.076 (.071)
Insulin level 0.230 (.001)
HOMA-IR 0.282 (.001)
Hs-CRP level 0.142 (.061)
Psoriasis characteristics
PASI score 0.156 (\.001)
BSA 0.075 (.305)
Systemic and/or biologic therapy 0.009 (.903)

All values are represented as b value (P value).


BMI, Body mass index; BSA, body surface area; CVD, cardiovascular
disease; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FRS, Framingham risk score;
HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model
assessment of insulin resistance; Hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-
reactive protein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; NIH, National
Institutes of Health; PASI, Psoriasis Area Severity Index; SBP,
systolic blood pressure.
7.e3 Egeberg et al J AM ACAD DERMATOL
n 2017

Supplemental Table III. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses of vascular inflammation versus
disease duration in the NIH cohort
Vascular inflammation (N = 190)
Univariable Multivariable
Parameter b (P value) 95% CI b (P value) 95% CI
Duration of psoriasis 0.086 (.040) 0.040-0.132 0.171 (.002) 0.112-0.230
Age at onset 0.172 (.020) 0.163 to 0.507 0.147 (.010) 0.331 to 0.625
Male sex 0.266 (\.001) 0.221-0.311 0.206 (\.001) 0.161-0.251
Previous CVD 0.075 (.077) 0.026-0.124 0.042 (.325) 0.007 to 0.091
Statin use 0.145 (.001) 0.099-0.191 0.122 (.027) 0.062-0.182
Diabetes 0.014 (.735) 0.033 to 0.061 0.044 (.295) 0.002 to 0.090
Hypertension 0.165 (\.001) 0.120-0.210 0.07 (.085) 0.050-0.090
Alcohol abuse 0.014 (.734) 0.032 to 0.060 0.049 (.229) 0.005-0.093
Smoking 0.133 (.002) 0.087-0.179 0.187 (\.001) 0.142-0.232
Framingham risk score 0.406 (\.001) 0.226-0.586 0.337 (\.001) 0.082-0.592

All values are reported as standardized b (P value). 95% CI values represent the CI for standardized b-values.
NIH, National Institutes of Health; CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen