0 Stimmen dafür0 Stimmen dagegen

11 Aufrufe8 SeitenThe primary purpose of this paper is comparing six common models, which were linear, quadratic, Cobb-Douglas, translog, logarithmic, and transcendental, to estimate the supply and demand functions for Saudi Arabian wheat. In addition to estimating the market equilibrium for price and quantity, that led to identifying consumer and producer surplus. Data cover 1990-2014 for all the variables that used to show the effect supply and demand of Wheat. After testing the models using Stepwise and Box-Cox, we came up with the fact that the linear and Cobb-Douglas methods were the best models to show the relationship between variables. On the supply side, we found using the linear model, that wheat price had a negative sign, which represents the impact of government policy number 335. However, in the Cobb-Douglas model, the wheat price had a positive sign. The elasticity coefficient of supply for the wheat price was inelastic. Moreover, the result also showed that all the elasticity coefficients in the supply and demand models were inelastic. The low-income elasticity of demand led the consumption of wheat to increase.

Jun 19, 2018

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT oder online auf Scribd lesen

The primary purpose of this paper is comparing six common models, which were linear, quadratic, Cobb-Douglas, translog, logarithmic, and transcendental, to estimate the supply and demand functions for Saudi Arabian wheat. In addition to estimating the market equilibrium for price and quantity, that led to identifying consumer and producer surplus. Data cover 1990-2014 for all the variables that used to show the effect supply and demand of Wheat. After testing the models using Stepwise and Box-Cox, we came up with the fact that the linear and Cobb-Douglas methods were the best models to show the relationship between variables. On the supply side, we found using the linear model, that wheat price had a negative sign, which represents the impact of government policy number 335. However, in the Cobb-Douglas model, the wheat price had a positive sign. The elasticity coefficient of supply for the wheat price was inelastic. Moreover, the result also showed that all the elasticity coefficients in the supply and demand models were inelastic. The low-income elasticity of demand led the consumption of wheat to increase.

© All Rights Reserved

Als PDF, TXT **herunterladen** oder online auf Scribd lesen

11 Aufrufe

The primary purpose of this paper is comparing six common models, which were linear, quadratic, Cobb-Douglas, translog, logarithmic, and transcendental, to estimate the supply and demand functions for Saudi Arabian wheat. In addition to estimating the market equilibrium for price and quantity, that led to identifying consumer and producer surplus. Data cover 1990-2014 for all the variables that used to show the effect supply and demand of Wheat. After testing the models using Stepwise and Box-Cox, we came up with the fact that the linear and Cobb-Douglas methods were the best models to show the relationship between variables. On the supply side, we found using the linear model, that wheat price had a negative sign, which represents the impact of government policy number 335. However, in the Cobb-Douglas model, the wheat price had a positive sign. The elasticity coefficient of supply for the wheat price was inelastic. Moreover, the result also showed that all the elasticity coefficients in the supply and demand models were inelastic. The low-income elasticity of demand led the consumption of wheat to increase.

© All Rights Reserved

Als PDF, TXT **herunterladen** oder online auf Scribd lesen

- MB0042-MBA-1st Sem 2011 Assignment Managerial Economics
- Case Summary
- Supply and Demand Curves Worksheet (1)
- Eco 3-Elasticity of Demand
- 2.Demand Supply (2)
- Global and China Optical Fiber Preform Industry Report, 2011-2012
- 2nd Assign Micr-macro (Solution)
- Review for Exam 1 ECO 284 S19
- Microeconomics SL
- OCR Business Studies AS F292 PreRelease Toolkit June 2014
- Imperial BusEcon 2016 S1 S2
- Important Diagrams
- 145.docx
- 40%
- 2.THEORY OF DEMAND AND SUPPLY. (1).pdf
- Consumer and Producer Surplus
- Elasticidade-preço Da Procura
- group-7 (1)
- Management accounting
- Macroeconomics I, Winter 2018, Lecture 1, The Science of Macroeconomics.ppt

Sie sind auf Seite 1von 8

Research Article

Functions of Wheat Supply and Demand in Saudi Arabia1

*Yosef Alamri1, Tyler Mark2

1,2

Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

Cobb-Douglas, translog, logarithmic, and transcendental, to estimate the supply and demand

functions for Saudi Arabian wheat. In addition to estimating the market equilibrium for price and

quantity, that led to identifying consumer and producer surplus. Data cover 1990-2014 for all the

variables that used to show the effect supply and demand of Wheat. After testing the models using

Stepwise and Box-Cox, we came up with the fact that the linear and Cobb-Douglas methods were

the best models to show the relationship between variables. On the supply side, we found using

the linear model, that wheat price had a negative sign, which represents the impact of government

policy number 335. However, in the Cobb-Douglas model, the wheat price had a positive sign. The

elasticity coefficient of supply for the wheat price was inelastic. Moreover, the result also showed

that all the elasticity coefficients in the supply and demand models were inelastic. The low-income

elasticity of demand led the consumption of wheat to increase.

INTRODUCTION

The primary purpose of this investigation is to determine the (SAGO) was required to stop purchasing locally produced

factors that affected the supply and demand of Saudi wheat for up to eight years, at an annual decline rate of

Arabia’s wheat crop over the past three decades. This 12.5%. The resolution also prohibited the export of locally

information will be useful to policymakers in the produced wheat. Also, the Ministry of Agriculture stopped

development of future agricultural policies, as agricultural issuing licenses to produce wheat, barley, and fodder. The

policies are the most critical indicators of an agricultural agricultural policy changes resulted in some wheat farmers

policy’s success. To assist in accomplishing the becoming reluctant to grow wheat in Saudi Arabia, due to

investigation’s goal, this introduction will provide a detailed higher input costs and lower revenues (Al-Hadithi, 2002),

historical account of Saudi Arabia’s wheat crops. (Al-Nashwan, 2010). Consequently, between 2008 and

2016, wheat was only cultivated on approximately 171.97

Wheat production has been an important part of Saudi thousand hectares annually, resulting in the production of

Arabia’s agricultural production history for many decades. 1.05 million tons of wheat, on average, as opposed to the

During two decades, the government provided supportto 2.5 million tons produced annually in the previous two

farmers to produce wheat. As a result of the government’s decades (ADF, 2017; Al-Nashwan, 2010; MEWA, 2017;

support, approximately 535.6 thousand hectares of land, on SAGO, 2017).

average, was dedicated to wheat production between

1990–2007, resulting in the production of 2.5 million tons of

wheat annually.

*Corresponding author: Yosef Alamri, Department of

In 2008, Saudi Arabia decided to change their wheat Agricultural Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington,

cultivation map. As a result, they developed Resolution 335. KY, USA. Tel: 859-257-5762, Fax: 859-323-1913. E-mail:

This resolution stated that the Saudi Grains Organization Yosef.alamri@uky.edu

1 Selected Poster prepared at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association’s 2018 Annual Meeting, Jacksonville, FL, February 3-6, 2018.

Alamri and Mark 462

Table 1: Wheat area, production, yield, producer and import prices, import quantity and value, and domestic

consumption in Saudi Arabia during the period (1990-2016).

* General Authority for statistics (GASTAT). Saudi Arabia.

* FOASTAT, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

* The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), PSD and GATS.

As can be expected, a significant part of the Saudi gross average daily domestic consumption of wheat was about 7

domestic product (GDP) consists of wheat-related activities. thousand tons per day. The average per capita consumption

Between 1990 and 2016, the average Saudi GDP was of wheat in Saudi Arabia was about 104 kg per year.

$343.7 billion, with 87% of GPD belonging to the petroleum

sector and 4% ($11.1 billion) belonging to agricultural The research problem arose when the gap between the

products (The World Bank, 2017; CIA, 2017). The average local production and domestic consumption of wheat

per capita GDP and agricultural GDP from 1990 to 2016 encouraged local studies to focus on the most critical factors

was about 13.5 thousand dollars and 468.2 dollars, that led to the growth of this gap. These studies focused on

respectively. The big gap between the two numbers resulted agricultural policies, as well as supply and demand shifter,

in the government providing more attention to the which did not provide a complete picture of this crop.

development of the agricultural sector. Therefore, it was not possible to determine the factors

affecting the supply and demand of the wheat crop at the

Table 1 illustrates that the average area of wheat cultivation same time. Consequently, the primary purpose of this

and average wheat production in Saudi Arabia, from 1990 investigation is to determine the factors that affected the

to 2016, was 414.4 thousand hectares and 2.04 million tons, supply and demand of Saudi Arabia’s wheat crop over the

at a rate of decline of about 0.03% and 0.02% annually, past three decades.

respectively. The relative importance of the total area of

wheat planted and wheat production was about 38% and The rest of this paper is organized as follows. The next

42% in 2016, respectively (MEWA, 2017). Total wheat section focuses on developing the supply, demand, and

production in 2016 was estimated at 765.8 thousand tons, market equilibrium models. That section is followed by the

a decline of about 79% when compared to 1990. estimation results. In the final section, we discuss our

conclusions and elaborate upon our policy implications. We

From 1990 to 2016, the average wheat productivity per also provide recommendations for future research.

hectare was about 5.21 tons per hectare, with a growth rate

of about 0.007% per year. Wheat productivity in 2016 was

about 6.26 tons per hectare, which was 35% more than that METHODOLOGY

in 1990 (4.65 tons per hectare). Producer prices ranged

from $445.8 (2016) to $252.9 (1990) per ton, while the The agricultural products market often influenced by a set

average producer’s wheat price was about $329.3 (1990- of external factors of the market mechanism itself, which

2016) per ton. affects the demand and supply of the agricultural products

market. The supply of agricultural produce is affected by

The average import quantity and value of wheat during the natural and disaster factors, such as floods, rainfall, soil

period 1990–2016 in Saudi Arabia accounted for 612.9 fertility, and high or low temperature, among others. The

thousand tons and $189.06 million, with an annual growth demand for agricultural produce is affected by sudden

rate of about 0.12% and 0.12%, respectively. When consumption changes such as wars, diseases, population

compared to 1990, the Saudi import quantity of wheat was increase, and more (Debertin, 2012).

732% higher in 2008 and 1311% higher in 2016. The

average wheat import price during the period of 1990–2016 To estimate the supply function for the wheat crop during the

was about $346.6 per ton, with an annual decline of about study period, local production was adopted as a dependent

0.002% during that same period. variable; and producer wheat price, the area cultivated by

wheat, wheat import price, rice import price, the amount of

During the study period, the average annual domestic fertilizer, the amount of rainfall, and the number of tractors

consumption of wheat was about 2.45 million tons, while the per hectare (a variable that reflects the use of technology)

Functions of Wheat Supply and Demand in Saudi Arabia

J. Agric. Econ. Rural Devel. 463

Where y is the dependent variables, x’s are independent variables, and 𝛼 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝛾 are parameters to be estimated.

were adopted as independent variables. Dummy variables in Saudi Arabia using a range of mathematical models. He

were also used (1: production before 2008; 0: production used six models to predict the values of productivity, such

after 2008) to show the impact of government policy number as the linear trend model, quadratic trend model, double

335. moving average, double exponential smoothing, simple

moving average, and simple exponential smoothing. Taj

The supply production function is as follows: Eddin, Khalife, and Al-Batal (1993) used a linear regression

method to estimate the production function in Saudi Arabia,

𝑄𝑠 = 𝑓(𝑃𝑤 , 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎, 𝑃𝑖𝑚 , 𝑃𝑟, 𝑇𝑓𝑟 , 𝑅𝑎𝑖𝑛𝐹𝑎𝑙𝑙 , 𝑇𝑒𝑐, 𝐷) while Al-Turkey (1991) estimated many production

On the other hand, the individual demand for wheat functions, finding that the quadratic function was the most

depends on its price and the prices of alternative conciliatory.

commodities such as rice, per capita income, and

population. These variables affect the demand; thus, the In this study, we used a widely different function to estimate

relationship can be represented in the following form: the supply and demand function of wheat, as represented

𝑄𝑑 = 𝑓(𝑃𝑤 , 𝑃𝑟 , 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑝, 𝑃𝑖𝑚 , 𝑃𝑂𝑃, 𝐷) in Table 3. Non-linear transformation: made the distribution

of the residuals more normal and reduced the

Model Specification multicollinearity and heteroskedastic problems. (Gujarati and

Dawn, 2009), (William, 2003).

AlSultan (2005) studied the forecasting of wheat productivity

Functions of Wheat Supply and Demand in Saudi Arabia

Alamri and Mark 464

Market Equilibrium For the supply model, we tested for the best function that

prefers to use the Box-Cox test for each variable, and we

From the above supply and demand function, we can solve found that linear function was the preferred function.

for both price and quantity equilibrium by using However, we tested for all variables together to check for

simultaneous model. First, we can find the market price the preferred function, and we rejected the null hypothesis

equilibrium as 𝑄𝑠 = 𝑄𝑑 . for all three forms (linear, log, inverse). Therefore, we were

unable to decide which one was preferred. For the demand

Therefore, the equilibrium quantity for this market is: function, we found that logarithmic function is the preferred

𝑄 ∗ = 𝛿0 − 𝛿1 A𝑟𝑒𝑎 − 𝛿2 𝑃𝑖𝑚 − 𝛿3 𝑇𝑓𝑟 − 𝛿4 𝑅𝑎𝑖𝑛𝐹𝑎𝑙𝑙 − 𝛿5 𝑇𝑒𝑐 function, these results was different than Al-Turkey (1991)

+ 𝛿6 𝑃𝑟 + 𝛿7 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑝 + 𝛿8 𝑃𝑂𝑃 + φ who found that quadratic function was favorable (using

survey data). However, we tested for all variables together

Data to check for the preferred function and found that logarithmic

function is the preferred function. Although several models

The models were estimated using time series data from were estimated, we tried to prove that the Box-Cox test

1990–2016. We used various sources to estimate our generated a best-predicted function form. Our result

models. Data on area and production came from the Open indicates that what we found in the Box-Cox test was the

Source Library at the Ministry of Environment, Water and best function form when compared to the others.

Agriculture and the General Authority for statistics

(GASTAT) in Saudi Arabia. The Food and Agriculture We estimated more than 70 equations for supply and 30

Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the United equations for demand to find the best function. Also, we

States Department of Agriculture (USDA) were used to used stepwise regression to get a useful and reasonable

collect data for import quantity and value for wheat and rice regression model. We used the Enter and Stepwise

in addition to the domestic consumption and producer methods since we are interested in some of the independent

wheat price. variables not omitted from our function.

The number of tractors and fertilizer consumption collected Estimating the Supply Function

from FAO as well as the Statistical, Economic and Social

Research and Training Centre for Islamic Countries For the fertilizer variables, we tried to collect different types,

(SESRIC) and the Arab Organization for Agricultural but since we were unable to gather complete data, we used

Development (AOAD). GDP, population, and the amount of what was available in our sources. We included Nitrogenous

rainfall collected from available secondary data from the (N), Phosphate (PH), Potash (PO), and Urea (UR).

World Development Indicators - World Data Bank. However, we tried to estimate the model by including all

these variables, but none were significant. We dropped

each variable one by one, but they were still not significant.

RESULT AND DISCUSSION Therefore, we included total fertilizer as representative of

these four types, and we found somewhat that the variables

To estimate the supply and demand function, we used six of our models improved.

common models, namely linear, quadratic, Cobb-Douglas,

translog, logarithmic, and transcendental. As a result of the high R2 and the fact that some of the

coefficients were not significant and got the opposite sign,

We checked for the correlation matrix between the we were worried about facing multicollinearity problems.

independent and dependent variables. For the supply We, therefore, tested for multicollinearity using the variance

variables, Pw, Pim, Rainfall, Tec, and TFr were weakly inflation factors (VIF) test and variance-covariance matrix of

correlated with Qs, whereas Area and Pr had highly the fitting coefficient. For the VIF test, we tested for any

correlated to Qs. However, there were high correlations coefficient more than 10, and we displayed high

between the Tfr and different types of fertilizer, and between multicollinearity between the variables with quadratic,

these variables themselves. In demand variables, we found translog, logarithmic, and transcendental forms. The

that there were high correlations between Pr, PerCap, and quadratic and translog models were not of full rank. The

POP variables with Qd. while Pw and Pim had a weak least-squares solutions for the parameters were not unique.

correlation with Qd. The technology sign was negative Some statistics will be misleading, and some parameters

because of the high decrease in production after 2008 due had been set to 0 since the variables were a linear

to government policy number 335, while the cumulative combination of other variables. This problem leads to face

number of machines increased. However, the farm cannot the multicollinearity problem. Therefore, we ignored these

get rid of them or resell them again. One of the important forms. Also, some of these functions had no significance

points for estimating the best result is how to choose the with prices. We also used a variance-covariance matrix of

function forms, meaning what kind of relationship exists the appropriate coefficient test to show the correlation

between the dependent and independent variables, between variables, as in the regression. Then we omitted

whether linear or not linear. the highly correlated independent variables (which had

more than 0.80) or those variables that had opposite signs

Functions of Wheat Supply and Demand in Saudi Arabia

J. Agric. Econ. Rural Devel. 465

in the regression from our hypothesis. Also, we checked for level. With different estimated functions, we chose the first

heteroskedasticity by using the Breusch-Pagan test, and we model, Cobb-Douglas, which had the economy sign we

found that the null hypothesis was not significant, which expected. The results showed that the production of wheat

means there was no heteroskedasticity problem. was a positive function of producer wheat price, area, wheat

import price, and time, but decreased with the number of

Table 4 represents a coefficient table of the best functional machines per hectare. To estimate the marginal effect, we

form. All the models had a high value of F-test (p<0.001) took the derivative of our function and found that all the

and R2 (got more than 0.9), which confirms the high variables were positively associated with wheat production

explanatory power of the model statistically. When we and negatively associated with the number of machines per

included the dummy variable, we did not get any significant hectare. We found that the first and third models represent

variables for prices. Therefore, we chose the models that the increasing return to scale (which means that the function

didn’t include a dummy for a linear function. However, the is homogenous of degrees higher than one), while the

Cobb-Douglas with a dummy variable had a significant second model represents the decreasing return to scale.

price, which was the only form.

We calculated the elasticity for each variable. However, all

The Linear function had two models. The T-test indicated the elasticity coefficients were inelastic for all models. We

that all the coefficients had a significant result at the 10% calculated the elasticity for the first linear function of the own

significance level, except for rice import price. All the price, wheat import price, and rice import price, and the

variables received the same sign as what expected; the technology elasticity, which were 0.16, 0.07, 0.05, and 0.13,

mean problem sign was the price of wheat, which was respectively. Since the own price was less than one, the

negative and reflected the supply law. However, since the supply was less responsive to changes in price. The cross

government interfered with this market until 2008, this led to prices were positive referring to the increasing supply of

the farmers facing the market price (lower than the wheat as the cross-price rose. We also calculated a second

government price), and many of farmers refrained from linear function of the own price elasticity, which was -0.19,

cultivating wheat. The sign of Tec was negative, and the only and the cross-price elasticity for wheat import price was

aspect apparent to affect this was that the reluctance of the 0.07, while the technology elasticity was -0.12%. The

farmers to grow wheat led to the accumulation of machinery coefficient elasticity for the first Cobb-Douglas function of

on farms, with a decline in cultivating wheat and a higher the own price, cross-price, and technology elasticity were

number of annual machinery. Therefore, as a result from the 0.1, 0.08, and 0.06, respectively. Since the coefficient of the

linear model, wheat production was expected to increase elasticity was between zero and one, the production of

with more units in the area and wheat import price, but a wheat was less responsive to the change of each of these

decrease in units of producer wheat price and the number variables. The second Cobb-Douglas function found that

of machines per hectare. the own price and technology elasticity were 0.68 and 0.12,

respectively. Also, the third Cobb-Douglas function result

Second, the results of the Cobb-Douglas production showed that the own price, wheat and rice import price, and

function as log-linear (by including time to capture the technology elasticity were 0.12, 0.08, 0.03, and 0.05,

impact of technical change) presented in Table 3. All the respectively.

variables had a significant t-test at the 10% significance

Alamri and Mark 466

Estimating the Demand Function The Saudi Arabian government used the price support

Six functions form were used to estimate the demand program for wheat producers. Under this program, the

function for wheat crops: linear, quadratic, Cobb-Douglas, government can raise the price of wheat by buying it from

translog, logarithmic, and transcendental. We tested for the producer. In our cases, the government interfered the

multicollinearity and found that we were facing this problem. wheat market, represented by the Saudi Grains

By using the VIF test, we found that some variables had Organization, buying domestic wheat from the producer at

more than 10, and we dropped it from our regression. After a high price and then sell the quantity back to the market at

that, we checked for heteroskedasticity. By using the lower prices, after converting the wheat to other products

Breusch-Pagan test, we found that our model survived this (since it had a higher price than the market, producers will

potential issue. The results indicated that the best function sell their product to the government to get a high profit). As

representing the demand function was linear and Cobb- a result, we face the problem of estimating the market price

Douglas, whereas the signs for the coefficient were and quantity equilibrium, and the market shows distortions.

compatible with economic theory, and the R adjusted We used the simultaneous equation model to estimate the

square was higher than the other functions. equilibrium price for the wheat market. Therefore, we need

Qs=Qd for equilibrium, and then we solve for the price P𝑤∗ ,

We chose the Cobb-Douglas function, the third equation in as follow:

Table 4, which had the expected sign for all variables and 𝑙𝑛𝑃𝑤∗ = 77.65 − 3.23𝑙𝑛𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 + 0.21𝑙𝑛𝑇𝑒𝑐 − 0.28𝑙𝑛𝑃𝑖𝑚

had a significant t-test at the 10% significance level. The + 1.41𝑙𝑛𝑃𝑒𝑟𝐶𝑎𝑝 − 0.03𝑡 − 0.76𝐷

results indicate that the consumption of wheat increased The average equilibrium price for the period 1990–2016

with more units of per capita income but decreased with was $322.5/ton2. It was lower than the average producer

more units of producer wheat price. price, which was $329.3/ton. This gap in prices (which was

$6.8/ton) resulted because of the government intervention

In demand elasticity, we found that the elasticity was less

in determining wheat prices within markets. The quantity

than one (inelastic), which indicates that the demand was

equilibrium from the supply side equaled 1788.7 thousand

less responsive to the change of these variables. We

tons, and from the demand side equaled 2361.1 thousand

calculated the first linear function elasticity of the own price

tons. Consumers saw the benefit from the government

elasticity, which was 0.19. The income elasticity was 0.22,

intervention in this case, with the lower-priced consumer

which shows that the wheat commodity was normal and

surplus increase. The losses from changing the price for the

necessary. Also, for the first Cobb-Douglas function, the

consumer was $526.02 thousand, and the benefit for

own price and income elasticity were 0.188 and 0.407,

producers were equal at $576.9 thousand. The total social

respectively. The elasticity of the second Cobb-Douglas

surplus was $50.8 thousand, and the government’s cost

function found that the own price and income elasticity were

was $187.6 thousand. These results were different from AL-

0.123 and 0.193, respectively.

Kahtani (1994), who determined the optimum quantity of

Estimating Market Equilibrium wheat production under the government subsidy policy for

wheat prices ($533.3 per ton). He found that the optimal

At market equilibrium, the demand is exactly equal to production of wheat should be 1.004 million tons. Thus, the

supply, which meant that at the equilibrium price the buyers benefits of the producer and the consumer amount to

who are willing to buy at this price would get the quantity $30.03 and $12.8 million, respectively, while the

they need, and the sellers who are willing to sell their government and social costs were $44.32 and $1.5 million,

product at that price will also get their quantity. (Gujarati and respectively.

Dawn, 2009), (William, 2003).

2

To find the price equilibrium, we used the standard Generalized Using the predicted value, we could find the equilibrium price and

Reduced Gradient (GRG) provides from Excel programming. This quantity by minimizing the sum of squares error.

method can control for non-linear models to find the optimal solution.

Functions of Wheat Supply and Demand in Saudi Arabia

J. Agric. Econ. Rural Devel. 467

One aspect that removed market distortion was that the equilibrium amount was $322.5/ton. Therefore, the

government phased out the subsidies from the producer. consumer losses was $526.02 thousand and producer

The price was not the original price because of the benefit was $576.9 thousand, while the government cost

government intervention (represented by the Saudi Grains was $187.6 thousand.

Organization), where they bought domestic wheat from the

producer at Pw and then sold it to the consumer at less than The study recommends focusing on the period after the

the average world market price, which was about government's decision to stop subsidizing wheat. It also

$322.5/ton, compared to the domestic produce average recommends reviewing the decision by presenting the

price of about $329.3/ton during the period 1990–2016. benefits and costs carried by society. The orientation of

foreign investment in wheat cultivation is a solution in case

of stability of that country.

CONCLUSION

policy number 335, which changed the map of wheat

ADF. Agricultural Development Fund. Saudi Arabia.

cultivation significantly. The government programs

www.adf.gov.sa. Accessed September 5, 2017.

contributed to supporting wheat cultivation and then

Al-Hadithi, Abdullah (2002). Location quotient and

stopped this support, which led to a rapid decrease in the

productivity merit of the wheat crop in the Kingdom of

area used for wheat cultivation and domestic production.

Saudi Arabia. Kuwait University. Scientific Publishing

Council, Vol. 2, No. 182.

The research problem showed that when the gap occurred

AL-Kahtani, Safer H (1994). Optimum Wheat Production

between local production and domestic consumption of

in Saudi Arabia. Journal of King Saud Univ., Agriculture

wheat expansion, local studies were encouraged to focus

Science. Vol. 6, No.1, pp, 3-12. King Saud University,

on the most important factors that led to the growth of this

Riyadh.

gap.

Al-Nashwan, Othman (2010). Economic Evaluation of the

impact of Government Decision No. 335 on wheat.

The aims of this research were estimating the supply and

Conference on Agricultural Development Strategy and

demand functions for Saudi Arabian wheat, in addition to

Challenges of Food Security, College of Agriculture,

estimating the market equilibrium for price and quantity that

Alexandria University, (28-29 July).

led to identifying consumer and producer surplus. The

AlSultan, Mahdi M (2005). Predicting the productivity of

results showed that the most important factor for wheat

wheat in Saudi Arabia using sets of Mathematical

supply was producer wheat price, area cultivated, rice

Models. Journal of Alexandria for the exchange of

import price, wheat import price, the quantity of total

scientific, University of Alexandria, volume 27, No. 2,

fertilizer, the total amount of rainfall, and the number of

pp: 127-134.

machines per hectare. Furthermore, wheat demand factors

Al-Turkey, Ibrahim A (1991). The Economics of Wheat

were producer wheat price, rice import price, wheat import

Production for Various Fertilizer Processes in Al-

price, per capita GDP, and total population. We used a

Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia, Journal of King Saud

widely different function to estimate the supply and demand

University, Agricultural Sciences (2). Vol. 3. pp. 87-105,

function of wheat. We chose the linear and Cobb-Douglas

King Saud University, Riyadh.

methods to estimate supply and demand relationships

Anderson, D., T. Chaisantikulavat, A. Tan Khee Guan, M.

between variables.

Kebbeh, N. Lin, and C. Shumway (1996). Choice of

functional form for agricultural production analysis.

On the supply side, we found using the linear model that

Review of Agricultural Economics. 18: 223-231.

wheat price had a negative sign, which represents the

AOAD, Arab Organization for Agricultural Development.

impact of government policy number 335. However, in the

Database. http://www.aoad.org/database_en.htm.

Cobb-Douglas model, the wheat price had a positive sign.

Accessed September 15, 2017.

In both models, the cumulative of the area and wheat import

CIA, Central Intelligence Agency, library.

price had a positive impact on the production. The proxy of

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-

technology had a negative relation with production, which

factbook/geos/print_sa.html. Accessed September 15,

shows the accumulation of machinery in farms after the

2017.

government decision. The elasticity coefficient of supply for

Debertin, David L (2012). Agricultural Production

the wheat price was inelastic, which represents that supply

Economics. University of Kentucky. Second Edition.

was less responsive to changes in price. Moreover, the

FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United

result also showed that all the elasticity coefficients in the

Nations. Statistics Division. http://faostat3.fao.org/.

supply and demand models were inelastic (less than one).

Accessed September 5, 2017.

The low-income elasticity of demand led the consumption of

GASTAT. General Authority for statistics. Kingdom of Saudi

wheat to increase. However, the positive sign indicates that

Arabia. http://www.stats.gov.sa/en/. Accessed

wheat was a normal and necessary commodity. The

September 5, 2017.

Alamri and Mark 468

GATS. Global Agricultural Trade System Online. U.S. The World Bank. World Development Indicators.

Department of Agriculture. (FAS): Standard query. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

Online: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-

http://apps.fas.usda.gov/gats/ExpressQuery1.aspx. development-indicators. Accessed September 15,

Accessed September 5, 2017. 2017.

Gujarati, Domodar. N., and Dawn C., Porter (2009). Basic William H. Greene (2003). Econometric Analysis, William

Econometrics. London, MC Grow-Hill International H. Greene, Econometric Analysis, Fifth Edition,

Book Company. Published by Pearson.

http://pubcouncil.kuniv.edu.kw/aass/homear.aspx?id=8&R

oot=yes&authid=520

MEWA. Ministry of Environment Water & Agriculture,

Open Source Library.

https://www.mewa.gov.sa/en/InformationCenter/Open

Data/OpenSourceLibrary/Pages/OpenDataLibrary.asp

x. Accessed September 5, 2017. Accepted 13 June 2018

PSD. Production, Supply, and Distribution. U.S.

Department of Agriculture. (FAS): Standard query. Citation: Alamri Y, Mark T (2018). Functions of Wheat

http://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/psdQuery.aspx. Supply and Demand in Saudi Arabia. Journal of

Accessed September 5, 2017. Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, 4(2): 461-

SAGO, Saudi Grains Organization, Saudi Arabia. 468.

www.gsfmo.gov.sa. Accessed September 5, 2017

SESRIC. The Statistical, Economic, and Social Research

and Training Centre for Islamic Countries. BASEIND

Statistics Database. http://www.sesric.org/baseind.php.

Accessed September 5, 2017. Copyright: © 2018 Alamri and Mark. This is an open-

Taj Eddin, Shahabuddin, Khalifa, Ali, and Al-Batal, Hamad. access article distributed under the terms of the Creative

(1993). Biological and Economic Analysis of the Effect Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted

of Variety and Quantity of Seed on Wheat Production in use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,

Qassim. Journal of King Abdulaziz University. provided the original author and source are cited.

Meteorology, Environment, and Arid Land Agriculture.

Vol. 4, pp. 33-43.

- MB0042-MBA-1st Sem 2011 Assignment Managerial EconomicsHochgeladen vonAli Asharaf Khan
- Case SummaryHochgeladen vonWill Kane
- Supply and Demand Curves Worksheet (1)Hochgeladen vonAurolver
- Eco 3-Elasticity of DemandHochgeladen vonapi-3707078
- 2.Demand Supply (2)Hochgeladen vonAlly Johanna
- Global and China Optical Fiber Preform Industry Report, 2011-2012Hochgeladen vonBharat Book Bureau
- 2nd Assign Micr-macro (Solution)Hochgeladen vonNathan Young
- Review for Exam 1 ECO 284 S19Hochgeladen vonSelcenZ
- Microeconomics SLHochgeladen vonIBstudent10
- OCR Business Studies AS F292 PreRelease Toolkit June 2014Hochgeladen vonachi407
- Imperial BusEcon 2016 S1 S2Hochgeladen vonIgnacio Tovar
- Important DiagramsHochgeladen vonsophiecaitdavis
- 145.docxHochgeladen vonFunny Vids
- 40%Hochgeladen vonHayelom Yrgaw
- 2.THEORY OF DEMAND AND SUPPLY. (1).pdfHochgeladen vonZainab Malik
- Consumer and Producer SurplusHochgeladen vonmahesa
- Elasticidade-preço Da ProcuraHochgeladen vonAnabela Pinto Silva
- group-7 (1)Hochgeladen vonNgọc Ánh
- Management accountingHochgeladen vonvitabu mingi
- Macroeconomics I, Winter 2018, Lecture 1, The Science of Macroeconomics.pptHochgeladen vonHamna Azeez
- Chapter 9 TransmissionHochgeladen vonMalcolm
- Elasticity of demandHochgeladen vonSaleem azmi
- Concept of ElasticityHochgeladen vonBalasingam Prahalathan
- Assignment 1Hochgeladen vonYean Liew
- 09042_2_25_M_Q PVIIIHochgeladen vonsharathk916
- 1233esdfeHochgeladen vonmayankbisht
- Session 10 RevisionHochgeladen vonChakri Munagala
- Day 1 - Economic Principles in Transport - LHHochgeladen vonmkaswa
- Econ Final ReviewHochgeladen vonPeyton Lawrence
- ME 2 2017Hochgeladen vonShantanu Gawande

- The Key Challenges of Youth in EthiopiaHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Perceptions and Challenges of using Play Activities as Pedagogy: Perspectives of Kindergarten Teachers in the Ablekuma South MetropolisHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Factors Affecting Adoption of Value Addition Practices among Smallholder Irish Potato Farmers in Bomet County, KenyaHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Effects of Value Addition on the Profitability of Irish Potato Production in Bomet County, KenyaHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Analysis of Radiation Cystitis and Radiation Proctitis Cases in Patients with Carcinoma Cervix: A Retrospective StudyHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Remodeling a Manually Operated Bio Briquetting Machine for Bio Briquetting of Dry Chir Pine Needles in Western Himalayan RegionHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Reverse Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Following General AnaesthesiaHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Identifying Malaria Hazard Areas Using GIS and Multi Criteria: The Case Study at East Gojjam Zone, EthiopiaHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Seasonal Variations in Some Biological Parameters (Length-Weight Relationship, Condition Factor, Hepatosomatic and Gonadosomatic Index) of Silver and Black Pomfret (Pampus argenteus and Parastromateus niger) from the Bay of BengalHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Nanotechnology Applications in Crop Production and Food SystemsHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Separatist Agitation by the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), and National Question in NigeriaHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Determinants of Small-Scale Irrigation Use: The Case of Jeldu District, West Shewa Zone, Oromia National Regional State, EthiopiaHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Utilising Computer Simulation and Computerised Molecular Modeling Software to Enhance the Teaching and Learning of Hybridisation in Senior High SchoolsHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Using Visual Aids to Enhance Third Year Undergraduate Teacher Trainee Students’ Academic Performance in Reproduction and Growth in Flowering PlantsHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Analysis of Arable Land Protection Policies of ChinaHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Molecular Markers: Indispensable Tools for Genetic Diversity Analysis and Crop Improvement BiotechnologyHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Effect of Rates and Time of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Yield and Yield Components of Sorghum [sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] at Raya Valley, Northern EthiopiaHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Genotypes at Bako and Uke, Western OromiaHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Hate Speech and Nigeria’s Struggle for Democratic Consolidation: A Conceptual ReviewHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Factors Affecting Adoption and its Intensity of Malt Barley Technology Package in Malga Woreda Southern EthiopiaHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Determinants of Total Asset Growth in Micro and Small-Scale Enterprise in Gondar City, EthiopiaHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Quality Assessment of Igaliwo and Olokwu Coals in the Northern Anambra Basin of NigeriaHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Does Type of Dialysis Affect BNP in Fluid Overload Patients?Hochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Investigating Academic Performance in Practical Agriculture: Evidence from Single-Sex and Co-Educational High School StudentsHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- A Current-View on Rural Settlements in the Republic of TurkeyHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Hog Production and Agglomeration Economies: The Case of U.S. State-Level Hog ProductionHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Using the Economy of Sukari Gold Mine to Prove the Potential Economy of Hamama Gold Project, Eastern Desert, EgyptHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers
- Camel Trade and its Profitability Analysis in ChadHochgeladen vonPremier Publishers

- Effects of Different Volume-equated Resistance Training Loading Strategies on Muscular Adaptations in Well-trained MenHochgeladen vonjoaoevandro
- regression projectHochgeladen vonapi-314078334
- Sies 2013- Hra &HrpHochgeladen vonAarti Balan
- Chap 012Hochgeladen vonBG Monty 1
- MA notesHochgeladen vonronith
- Dactylogyrus PaperHochgeladen vonYougesh Kumar
- mc15Hochgeladen vonSialhai
- Syllabus MSc Banking and Finance.docxHochgeladen vonlanoox
- Deviance and Group CohesionHochgeladen vonMarcadeagua Bijuteria Artesanal
- 2014 Talent Et Al ACT Energy and Water BaselineHochgeladen vonpeter_martin9335
- HEC.docxHochgeladen vonEnriqueFernandez
- Facilities Equipment as Predictor of Sport Development in Edo State NigeriaHochgeladen vonنور امالينا زاينون
- 11.pdfHochgeladen vonkainatpervaiz
- CFA Level 1 Review - Quantitative MethodsHochgeladen vonAamirx64
- Air pollutant yield-loss assessment for four vegetable crops.pdfHochgeladen vonShakeel Khan
- DOES CULTURE MATTER IN BODY IMAGE?Hochgeladen vonMedical_Doctor
- IONESCU - Relations Between Travel Behavior and Sense of Community in New Urbanist NeighborhoodsHochgeladen vonSebastian Ionescu
- Data TransformHochgeladen vonShubham Tewari
- ABC analyisHochgeladen vonAnkit Rajvaidya
- Relation between CBR and Index Properties.pdfHochgeladen vonSumit Ghose
- CparHochgeladen vonRenalyn Espartero
- How Does Student Teachers’ Emotional intelligence Relate To Their Teaching CompetenciesHochgeladen vonInternational Organization of Scientific Research (IOSR)
- Downloads LogisticRegressionHochgeladen vonRonald Victor Galarza Hermitaño
- Tax Compliance and JusticeHochgeladen vonTesfaye Belaye
- Kyle&Harris JDSDE 2006Hochgeladen vonRaluca-Mariana Popa
- Computers in Chemical Engineering EducationHochgeladen vonShadarch Jatau
- STAT-30100. StatCrunch GuideHochgeladen vonA K
- forecasting.pptHochgeladen vonjoiematerum
- Panel Data Econometrics kenyaHochgeladen vondessietarko
- neonatologia Hidrocefalia post hemorragiaHochgeladen vonMaicol Phill

## Viel mehr als nur Dokumente.

Entdecken, was Scribd alles zu bieten hat, inklusive Bücher und Hörbücher von großen Verlagen.

Jederzeit kündbar.