Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Monopolistic Competition
by Smriti Chand Economics
Advertisements:
ii. However, since the various brands are close substitutes, its monopoly
position is influenced due to stiff ‘competition’ from other firms.
i. On one hand, the market for toothpaste seems to be full of competition, with
thousands of competing brands and freedom of entry.
ii. On the other hand, its market seems to be monopolistic, due to uniqueness
of each toothpaste and power to charge different price.
Let us now discuss some of the important features of this kind of market.
Features of Monopolistic Competition:
1. Large Number of Sellers:
There are large numbers of firms selling closely related, but not homogeneous
products. Each firm acts independently and has a limited share of the market.
So, an individual firm has limited control over the market price. Large number
of firms leads to competition in the market.
2. Product Differentiation:
Each firm is in a position to exercise some degree of monopoly (in spite of
large number of sellers) through product differentiation. Product differentiation
refers to differentiating the products on the basis of brand, size, colour, shape,
etc. The product of a firm is close, but not perfect substitute of other firm.
2. To differentiate the products, firms sell their products with different brand
names, like Lux, Dove, Lifebuoy, etc.
(ii) Imaginary Differences mean differences which are not really obvious but
buyers are made to believe that such differences exist through selling costs
(advertising).
3. Selling costs:
Under monopolistic competition, products are differentiated and these
differences are made known to the buyers through selling costs. Selling costs
refer to the expenses incurred on marketing, sales promotion and adver-
tisement of the product. Such costs are incurred to persuade the buyers to
buy a particular brand of the product in preference to competitor’s brand. Due
to this reason, selling costs constitute a substantial part of the total cost under
monopolistic competition.
It must be noted that there are no selling costs in perfect competition as there
is perfect knowledge among buyers and sellers. Similarly, under monopoly,
selling costs are of small amount (only for informative purpose) as the firm
does not face competition from any other firm.
6. Pricing Decision:
A firm under monopolistic competition is neither a price- taker nor a price-
maker. However, by producing a unique product or establishing a particular
reputation, each firm has partial control over the price. The extent of power to
control price depends upon how strongly the buyers are attached to his brand.
7. Non-Price Competition:
In addition to price competition, non-price competition also exists under
monopolistic competition. Non-Price Competition refers to competing with
other firms by offering free gifts, making favourable credit terms, etc., without
changing prices of their own products.
As seen in Fig. 10.4, output is measured along the X-axis and price and
revenue along the Y-axis. At OP price, a seller can sell OQ quantity. Demand
rises to OQ1, when price is reduced to OP1. So, demand curve under
monopolistic competition is negatively sloped as more quantity can be sold
only at a lower price.
MR < AR under Monopolistic Competition:
Like monopoly, MR is also less than AR under monopolistic competition due
to negatively sloped demand curve.
Let us prove this with the help of Fig. 10.5 (Proof is given just for reference).
We know, price elasticity of demand (by geometric method) at a point on the
demand curve is given by: Ed = Lower segment of demand curve / Upper
segment of demand curve.
At price ‘OP’, price elasticity of demand under monopolistic competition is
BC/AB and under monopoly is EF/DE. Fig. 10.5 reveals that BC > EF and DE
> AB. So, BC/AB > EF/DE.
Advertisements:
Related Articles:
Under These Conditions, MRP And VMP Of The Factors Are Equals
The Role of Selling Costs under Perfect Competition, Monopoly and Imperfect
Competition
Examples of Oligopoly
Once again, to understand how these industry structures work, it's helpful to think about an industry
you are familiar with that could be an oligopoly. For our purposes here, let's say if there are three to
four companies that control most of the market, it's an oligopoly. Utility companies are often set up
as regional monopolies, so they don't help us. Gas stations are closer to perfect competition, so that
doesn't provide much insight.
Take a second and think about it: what industry in the United States has three to four companies that
essentially rule the market? I bet you thought of a few: maybe oil companies, maybe airlines, maybe
public accountants. All excellent examples. For our example, let's use one we are probably all
familiar with, and one that constantly shows us how oligopolies behave towards each other and
customers: mobile phone providers.
So, in the mobile telephone market, we really have AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, and Sprint. There are
others in there: StraightTalk, Cricket, U.S. Cellular, and Boost. One of the most important things to
remember about an oligopoly is that the big players are not the only players in the market; they just
have a significant amount of the market share. If the eight providers I listed above all have about
10% market share, and a few smaller companies made up the rest of the market, we wouldn't have
an oligopoly.
But, take a guess at how much market share the top four providers have. What do you think? 50?
65%? 80%? Well, AT&T and Verizon both have about 34% each, so there goes 68% of the pie. T-
Mobile has about 16%, and Sprint has about 15%. That means the top four competitors in the mobile
phone industry have 99% of the market! Now, next time you hear the Justice Department tell AT&T
they can't acquire Sprint, it might make more sense. An AT&T that owned Sprint would have 50%
market share!