Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Project Structure
Group Consultations
Why Integrated Maternal
and Child Health?
High Child High Maternal
Mortality Mortality
High Home
Deliveries
Health System Challenges
EMERGING DEMAND SYSTEM CONSTRAINTS
Unhealthy behaviors &
lifestyle choices Lack of community empowerment
and engagement
Double burden of
disease and morbidity Insufficient financing &
HEALTH Inefficient spending
SYSTEM
Increased need to
self managed care Sub-optimal Health Workforce
1 2
“…the management and
delivery of health services such
Creating
enabling that people receive a
environment continuum of health
promotion, health protection
and disease prevention
services, through the different
4
levels and sites of care within
3 the health system and
according to their needs.”
Reorienting model
Coordinated services
of care
Integrated concept for
MCH in Tajikistan
How the project intends to move towards
Integrated care?
Empowering and engaging Strengthening Governance
people and communities and accountability
Strengthening
Human Resource
Enhance
Planning and
Continuous
Professional
Medical Education
Development
System
Function
Institutionalize
Continuous Quality Introduce output /
Improvement & outcome based
Supportive financing modality
Supervision systems
Creating
enabling
environment
4
Reorienting model of
care
District Health
Master Plan
Principles of District Health Master
Plan
Current System Future System
Integration of
functions
District Policlinic
EPI Center Reproductive
Health Center
Healthy Lifestyle
Center
District Policlinic
Tropical Medicine
Center
TB Center HIV Center
Principles of District Health Master Plan
Current Future
Structure Structure
District Hospital
Ward A Ward A
10 15
Ward B
Ward B
20 15
Ward C Ward C
25
40
Ward S
10
Principles of District Health Master Plan
Current Future
Structure Structure
District Hospital
Health System
8.1%
Doctors and
Specialists
Nurses
26.6%
Masterplan – Addressing key issues
Coordinated
services
Coordinated services
DISTRICT HEALTH SYSTEM
Referral to District PHC Center
Rural Health District Health Enforcement of
Center
House &
Rural Health Referral for home treatment and follow-up
referral pathways
Center
Facility visit
Human Resource
capacity building
District Hospital
1
Creating
enabling
Behavior Change
environment
Communication
Behavior Change Communication
1
Targeted at:
Topics
Pilot Districts
Process and Criteria for Selecting Districts for
Inclusion in the Project
• Step 1: selection of rayons
(1)percent of home delivery; (2) infant mortality rate; (3) early
neonatal mortality rate; (4) neonatal mortality rate; (5) stillbirths per
1,000; (6) child mortality rate; (7) maternal mortality rate; and (8)
poverty rate.
Sh. Shohin Khatlon 50.70 1,598.00 30.90 16.30 27.10 11.90 13.70 13.90 33.10 ––
1 116.00 19.3
Khovaling Khatlon 53.60 2,003.00 25.50 47.40 21.70 1.30 4.50 15.30 24.30 65.50 JICA, AKF
0 180.00 25.7
Baljuvon Khatlon 27.60 1,090.00 34.40 20.50 32.80 14.30 17.40 2.10 34.80 –– JICA
0 121.90 20.3
Norak Khatlon 55.90 2,530.00 33.90 3.60 21.50 8.80 9.70 9.30 26.00 –– JICA
1 78.90 13.2
Sangvor RRS 21.40 636.00 26.50 48.70 23.80 6.80 11.90 8.50 27.20 ––
0 126.90 21.2 AKF
Rasht RRS 115.20 3,891.00 26.90 35.70 12.50 3.40 4.30 11.20 16.90 29.20
1 113.20 16.2 AKF, RFG
RBF project
Faizobod RRS 93.40 3,923.00 29.50 6.60 21.30 10.90 13.20 2.10 24.80 29.60
district, Sino
1 108.50 15.5 (SDC)
Aini Sogd 77.60 2,265.00 29.40 1.70 13.70 4.70 6.00 3.80 17.90 42.70
0 90.50 12.9
Criteria based site selection
Component 2:
Component 1:
MCH Service delivery rationalization,
Integration of MCH service delivery
Infrastructure improvement and
and quality improvement
equipment provision
• Strengthening Governance and Reorienting model of care
accountability & Care Coordination
• Coordinated services
Component 3:
Improving Maternal and Child Component 4:
Health care and practices at Project Implementation
community level
Development
Partners
Integrated MCH
Project
Health System of
Republic of Tajikistan
GROUP Consultations
TOPIC 1:
Strengthening Governance and
accountability & Care Coordination
TOPIC 2:
Reorienting model of care – District Master
Plans
TOPIC 3:
Case –Based Financing
GROUP Consultations
TOPIC 1:
• Strengthening
Governance &
accountability
• Care Coordination
Integrated Health Services
Component 2:
Component 1:
MCH Service delivery rationalization,
Integration of MCH service delivery
Infrastructure improvement and
and quality improvement
equipment provision
• Strengthening Governance and
accountability & Care Coordination
• Coordinated services
Component 3:
Improving Maternal and Child Component 4:
Health care and practices at Project Implementation
community level
Component 1:
Integration of MCH service delivery
and quality improvement
Sub-Component 1.2:
Sub-Component 1.4: Piloting of
Operationalization of effective
Case Based Financing
referral systems
TOPIC 3
Sub-Component 1.1:
Health workforce planning and capacity building
• Nutrition
• Newborn Resuscitation
• Child Growth and Development
• Management of complicated deliveries
• Infant, Young Child Feeding
• Referral Algorithms
• Integrated management of Childhood
• Continuous Quality Improvement
Illnesses
• Supportive Supervision
• Safe immunization
• Equipment maintenance
• Effective Perinatal Care
• Other?
• Emergency Obstetric Care
• Antenatal and postnatal Care
Sub-Component 1.2:
Operationalization of effective referral systems
TOPIC 2:
Reorienting model of care –
District Master Plans
Integrated Health Services
Component 2:
Component 1:
MCH Service delivery rationalization,
Integration of MCH service delivery
Infrastructure improvement and
and quality improvement
equipment provision
Reorienting model of care
Component 3:
Improving Maternal and Child Component 4:
Health care and practices at Project Implementation
community level
Component 2:
MCH Service delivery rationalization,
Infrastructure improvement and equipment
provision
Sub-Component 2.1:
Sub-Component 2.2: Procurement of
Construction/Renovation of District
equipment and furniture
Hospitals and District Policlinics
Guiding principles
• Renovating or building new hospitals (as appropriate) in up to three target
districts with focus on quality rather than quantity (rationalization of bed
capacity -> optimization of hospital and outpatient care)
• Renovation of existing infrastructure where possible
• Integration of District PHC center
• Strengthening of referral system specifically for maternal and pediatric care
Sub-Component 2.1:
Construction/Renovation of District Hospitals and
District Policlinics
Sub-Component 1.3:
Sub-Component 1.1: Health workforce
Institutionalization of Continuous
planning and capacity building
Quality Improvement System
Sub-Component 1.2:
Sub-Component 1.4: Piloting of Case
Operationalization of effective
Based Financing
referral systems
TOPIC 3
MCH budgeting and financing
Existing system Proposed system
• The budget of medical facilities is • The budget of the institutions is compiled on
the basis of the per capita normative
compiled on the basis of the targeting the MCH, with the possibility of
number of hospital beds and staff applying adjustments to cover additional
costs related to geographical location, budget
standards, the target expenses for growth, provision of specialized services,
the MCH are not provided for; • Functional classification of the budget
consists of category 05101 General hospitals,
• The budget is compiled in two which are calculated on the basis of per
formats - by functional and capita standards for the MCH and other
inpatient services, and economic
economic classification classification is compiled according to the
existing system
• Financing is made monthly - • Financing is based on the functional
according to the approved cost classification of the budget - within the
estimate, within the approved amount of category 05101 General Hospitals
according to the provided reports and
budget for economic classification monthly acceptance for the treated cases
Budget calculation scheme for pilot regions
Functional classification, line 05101
State Guaranteed
Package (SGP) (50%,
30% co-payment by the
case)
Case based financing (Scheme 2, for subsidized pilot regions)
Republican Budget subsidy
+
Local Government Budget
Paid services
By Functional classification
line 05101
State Guaranteed
Package (SGP) (50%,
30% co-payment by the
case)
MCH budgeting and financing risk assessment
Existing system Proposed system
• There is no analysis of profitable and unprofitable • Updating the system of reporting and data
divisions, the costs for medical services and / or collection,
departments are not taken into account • Revision of existing budget formulation and
• Promotes capacity expansion financing mechanisms for medical facilities
• There is no incentive to provide services in • Integration of duplicated functions, us a result
accordance with the requirements of quality and the restructuring and optimization of medical
quantity, there is no incentive to apply advanced facilities and services,
technologies, • The increase in the number of admissions and
• Limited opportunity to encourage medical hospital cases,
personnel, • The increase in the number of complicated
• Financing is based on approved cost estimates, not cases,
taking into account the volume and quality of the
services provided, • Admissions of non-hospital cases,
• No binding with final results, • Increase hospital admissions from other
regions,
• Lack of incentives to support the referral system, • Calculation of prices for hospital cases,
• Lack of incentives for integration of duplicated
functions, for reorganization and optimization of • The amount of payment, the list of privileged
the facilities and services on all level of provision; groups and diseases
Case based financing mechanism introduction stages at the
hospital level
• Stage 1 - data collection and analysis, assessment of the feasibility of
implementing a case- based financing system, evaluation of existing information
systems for data collection and analysis, as well as the possibility become a
reporting system for payments,
• Stage 2 - development of a methodology for the budget calculation and
financing, agreeing and confirming of the methodology, virtual budget calculation
and financing, development of monitoring and evaluation indicators,
development of reporting and information systems proposal,
• Stage 3 - analysis and assessment of the impact of virtual budget and financing
calculations according to monitoring and analysis indicators, improvement of
methodology and confirmation (if necessary), development of an automated
module for data collection and analysis, calculations,
• Stage 4 – buget calculation and financing on the basis of new methods and using
an automated module, budget execution monitoring and evaluation
• Stage 5 - consideration of issues and assessment of the possibility of introducing
a new budget calculation and financing method at the national level
Actions and requirements
• Evaluation of existing regulatory and legal documents;
• Evaluation of existing pilot projects for case based financing;
• Assessment of paid services and SGP;
• Evaluation of the current systems of motivation of medical personnel;
• Evaluation of the current referral system;
• Assessment of macroeconomic indicators and opportunities to increase health
budgets at the republic and district level;
• Improve the capacity of institutions, districts and ministries to case based finance
management, data collection and analysis, monitoring and evaluation
• Budgeting and financing principles changes in the pilot regions,
• The distribution of responsibility for implementation, in particular the collection
and provision of data by reporting forms in fix date, the reorganization and
optimization of institutions and services via integration of duplicate functions at
all levels of medical services provision, preserving budget allocations at a
historical level, changing the financing system.
Issues for discussion
• Changes in budget calculations;
• The possibility of case based financing, taking into account the average amount of co-payment for groups
of services included in the SGP and the approved price calculations for paid services;
• The possibility of applying the case based financing method for all types of inpatient services;
• The possibility of applying the current forms of the report for case based financing;
• The development of a new method based on the regulations and prices for paid services, the regulations
and amount of the co-payments in SGP, the possibility of applying the costing / justification of the costs for
MCH in accordance with the investigations carried out by UNICEF;
• The issue of providing services to patients from other regions, the possibility of mutual settlements
between districts or reimbursement of such cases from the special account of the MOHSP of Tajikistan;
• The possibility of applying extra wage allowances taking into account the volume of work performed by
medical staff;
• The possibility of calculating the per capita normative for the MCH, taking into account the
costing/justification of the costs of MCH in accordance with the investigations carried out by UNICEF;
• Applying to PHC medical staff performance based financing on maternal and child health. As part of this,
consider the integration of health centers with the aim of using financial resources for medical personnel
performance based financing.
Project Preparation Plan
Negotiations
4
2
3 Fact-finding 1
mission