Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
AS2159 2009 – AS2870 2011 – AS4100 1998 – AS1163 2009 – AS1170.0 2002 – AS1170.1 2002
1. TM
Blade Pile
A superior ‘screw in pile’ or an alternative for bored piers, driven piles or grout piles.
Un-restrained structural limit testing in QLD Australia 2015 Blade Pile vs. Screw Pile comparison testing in QLD Australia 2008.
1. 2.
1.
Moree Solar Farm - Solar Blade Piles – Verticality & positioning unattainable with screw piles
Screw piles have one leading edge. A curved pitched helix that augers the soil during install.
The single edge induces out of round forces. The trailing edge follows into disturbed material.
Through soil settlement, over time bearing capacity will slowly ‘grow’ back into place around the
helix area (shaded Orange in diagram).
Twin Blade Piles counter balance each other for improved verticality. The Blades ‘sliver’ into
the soil with less disturbance for improved ‘end bearing’ compression & tension load capacity.
Blade Piles are manufactured from 350 Grade high tensile steel (Average 450 Mpa yield) for a
higher torsional install capacity and structural strength.
Blade Pile Blade Piles provide a level of installed verticality & positioning for finite tolerance structures, that Screw Pile
is simply unattainable with screw piles.
© Blade Pile Group Pty Ltd 2015 Page. 4
Patented - Slip Joint Pile Cap TM
Combined with the Blade pile & a raft slab design, the ’Pile Cap Slab
System’ is created.
The Blade Pile & Slip Joint Cap is deemed to comply as a ‘Bored Pier’
substitute, maintaining AS2870 compliance as an ‘isolated pier’.
© Blade Pile Group Pty Ltd 2015 Page. 5
Pile Cap Slab System, Shrinking Clay – Raft Slab, Blade Piles & Slip Joint Pile Cap TM
100mm
Patented – Isolated ‘Slip Joint’ Pile Caps
50mm
As Constructed – Ys RL
Ys point @ shrinkage
Blade Piles suspend slab and maintain ‘as constructed’ RL during soil shrinkage
© Blade Pile Group Pty Ltd 2015 Page. 6
Pile Cap Slab System, Heaving Clay – Raft Slab, Blade Piles & Slip Joint Pile Cap TM
100mm
Ys point @ heave
50mm As Constructed – Ys RL
100mm
0.75 Hs 0.75 Hs
50mm As Constructed – Ys RL
Ys point @ shrinkage
Bored Piers are engaged in friction within the reactive Clay zone, forcing the pier to follow the same path & level of heave & shrink movement.
To better manage movement within the Hs zone, the design engineer should consider founding depths relative to allowable slab deflection.
Slab is lifted by swelling clay and engaged rotating Bored Pier ‘Jacking’ forces
100mm
Ys point @ heave
0.75 Hs
0.75 Hs
50mm As Constructed – Ys RL
Bored Piers are engaged in friction within the reactive Clay zone, forcing the pier to follow the same path & level of heave & shrink movement.
To better manage movement within the Hs zone, the design engineer should consider founding depths relative to allowable slab deflection.
Pier support loss to slab during shrinkage leads to ‘Hogging’, confirmed by internal inspection of dwelling
© Blade Pile Group Pty Ltd 2015 Page. 10
Blade Pile & Pile Cap – A solution for all types of problem sites TM
Neighbouring Footings
Sewers
DRAFT ONLY
The Bracing Pile is a rapid piling system that is used to support lateral load requirements. The steel pile and its unique ‘Wing
Assembly’ are embedded into the ground, providing support for all types of above ground.
The Bracing Pile generates very high levels of lateral load capacity to obtain the optimum structure to pile, to soil interface.
The Bracing Piles are truly unique in their design because they can include any type of fixed, fused or adjustable connection/
support system, to facilitate easy on site installation, using less time and resources than traditional methods.
Solar Blade Piles installation, the Moree Solar Farm Bracing Blade Piles supporting Pirate Ship on slipway
16
© Blade Pile Group Pty Ltd 2015 Page. 16
3. TM
Pile Performance
Blade Piles being installed into the Brisbane River, for the Kingsford Smith Drive freeway widening, for the City to Airport Link
Structural Load
Dead!Load!g Live!Load!q Total!kN 1.2 1.5 ULS ØNc!(Ult!Axial) Non Mild Moderate ULS Optimum!Blade!Sets
Product!Code 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 Required ULS
11.1 11.1 22.2 13.3 16.7 30 1 280 248 211 138 138 BP.Y.1
200*x*100*x*8
1 76 87 97 108 120 131 142 154 50 30
16.7 16.7 33.3 20.0 25.0 45 2 280 248 211 138 138 BP.Y.1
200*x*100*x*8
2 76 87 97 108 120 131 142 154 75 45
22.2 22.2 44.4 26.7 33.3 60 3 280 248 211 138 138 BP.Y.3
250*x*125*x*8
3 99 113 124 135 147 158 170 202 100 60
27.8 27.8 55.6 33.3 41.7 75 4 280 248 211 138 138 BP.Y.3
250*x*125*x*8
4 99 113 125 135 147 158 170 202 125 75
33.3 33.3 66.7 40.0 50.0 90 5 280 248 211 138 138 BP.Y.8
300*x*150*x*8
5 125 142 165 178 192 206 220 235 150 90
38.9 38.9 77.8 46.7 58.3 105 6 280 248 211 138 138 BP.Y.8
300*x*150*x*8
6 125 142 165 178 192 206 220 235 175 105
44.4 44.4 88.9 53.3 66.7 120 7 280 248 211 138 138 BP.Y.16
350*x*175*x*10
7 160 180 199 215 229 260 276 293 200 120
50.0 50.0 100.0 60.0 75.0 135 8 340 306 272 204 204 BP.Y.24
400*x*200*x*10
8 199 223 245 268 286 302 319 336 225 135
55.6 55.6 111.1 66.7 83.3 150 9 340 306 272 204 204 BP.Y.24
400*x*200*x*10
9 199 223 245 268 286 302 319 336 250 150
61.1 61.1 122.2 73.3 91.7 165 10 340 306 272 204 204 BP.S.8
300*x*150*x*8*DUAL
10 242 275 320 345 372 399 426 455 275 165
66.7 66.7 133.3 80.0 100.0 180 11 340 306 272 204 204 BP.S.8
300*x*150*x*8*DUAL
11 242 275 320 345 372 399 426 455 300 180
72.2 72.2 144.4 86.7 108.3 195 12 340 306 272 204 204 BP.S.8
300*x*150*x*8*DUAL
12 242 275 320 345 372 399 426 455 325 195
77.8 77.8 155.6 93.3 116.7 210 13 453 410 367 282 282 BP.S.17
350*x*175*x*10*DUAL
13 307 345 382 412 439 499 529 562 350 210
83.3 83.3 166.7 100.0 125.0 225 14 453 410 367 282 282 BP.S.17
350*x*175*x*10*DUAL
14 307 345 382 412 439 499 529 562 375 225
88.9 88.9 177.8 106.7 133.3 240 15 453 410 367 282 282 BP.S.17
350*x*175*x*10*DUAL
15 307 345 382 412 439 499 529 562 400 240
94.4 94.4 188.9 113.3 141.7 255 16 453 410 367 282 282 BP.S.25
400*x*200*x*10*DUAL
16 408 459 508 548 584 663 703 747 425 255
100.0 100.0 200.0 120.0 150.0 270 17 453 410 367 282 282 BP.S.25
400*x*200*x*10*DUAL
17 408 459 508 548 584 663 703 747 450 270
105.6 105.6 211.1 126.7 158.3 285 18 633 577 509 371 371 BP.S.28
400*x*200*x*10*DUAL
18 382 428 470 515 549 580 613 645 475 285
111.1 111.1 222.2 133.3 166.7 300 19 633 577 509 371 371 BP.S.28
400*x*200*x*10*DUAL
19 382 428 470 515 549 580 613 645 500 300
116.7 116.7 233.3 140.0 175.0 315 20 633 577 509 371 371 BP.M.19
350*x*175*x*10*TRIPLE
20 447 503 556 600 640 726 771 818 525 315
122.2 122.2 244.4 146.7 183.3 330 21 633 577 509 371 371 BP.M.19
350*x*175*x*10*TRIPLE
21 447 503 556 600 640 726 771 818 550 330
127.8 127.8 255.6 153.3 191.7 345 22 633 577 509 371 371 BP.M.19
350*x*175*x*10*TRIPLE
22 447 503 556 600 640 726 771 818 575 345
133.3 133.3 266.7 160.0 200.0 360 23 633 577 509 371 371 BP.M.19
350*x*175*x*10*TRIPLE
23 447 503 556 600 640 726 771 818 600 360
©*Copyright*JCZT*Pty*Ltd*2016
Installed RL Position Within Allowable Pile Deflection Within Allowable Slab Deflection? Limit/Failure Deflection?
0 mm
0 kN Ult
11.8 mm Deflection
25.0 mm Deflection 50.0 mm Deflection?
138 kN Ult Geotechnical
210 kN Ult Geotechnical 280 kN Ult Geotechnical?
Øg .65 = 0 ULS
Øg 0.65 = 90 kN ULS
Øg 0 .65 = 136 kN ULS
50 Year = 120 kN ULS Limit / Failure?
Note: End bearing ‘pressure bulb’ restrained by overburden pressure of surrounding soil (VSC)…… to a limit point
Øg allowed solely from ‘on site’ AS2159 static load pile testing - 1.0% = 0.55, 2.0% = 0.65, 3.0% = 0.71, 4.0% = 0.76 (% of total piles).
© Blade Pile Group Pty Ltd 2015 Page. 21
AS2159 Site Specific Pile Designs – Multiple ways to streamline designs for every type of site TM
Reduced Pile Spacing Large Bladed Piles Dual Blade Piles Extra Large Blade Piles
Reduced pile spacing's can enable smaller Higher load capacities can Dual bladed piles
pile groups to share much larger loads in be achieved with smaller create a ‘hybrid’ Blade The standard range of Blade Piles
critical high load areas of the structural CHS tube piles, by attaching Pile, that achieves provides a variety of different sizes
design. Often representing the lowest cost larger blades for larger load load from both end and configurations to achieve loads
solution for increased loads or weaker soil. bearing pressure bulbs. bearing & skin friction. from 50 kN to 1,000 kN.
Design Data
• Current subsidence policies for residential site investigations (AS2870) are insufficient for
AS2159. Bore logs need to identify natural material with adequate soil strength data.
• Accurate SLS or ULS loads for each pile location is essential, for design calculations.
• Generic engineering load specifications simply forces Blade Pile to over-design with
larger, deeper and more expensive piles.
TM
????????
To 3.0 Metres
M/Dense Sand
Dense Sand
Page. 24
Residential Geotechnical Commercial
Infrastructur
Geotech Reporting Solution – Deep and precise Geotech reduces risk & cost Inspect &
Investigate
Energy
Assessment Environment
TM
fill
fill
fill
fill
Description DCP qa Description DCP qa
fill
fill
(M) (M) (M) (M) (M) (M)
0.0 FILL:%Clayey%Silty%SAND%(SC)$Loose$to$Medium$Dense 8 5.5 0.0 FILL:%Clayey%Silty%SAND%(SC)$Loose$to$Medium$Dense 5.5 0.0 FILL:%Clayey%Silty%SAND%(SC)$Loose$to$Medium$Dense 5 5.5
0.1 With$Gravel,$Brown/Grey/Yellow,$Moist 8 5.6 0.1 With$Gravel,$Brown/Grey/Yellow,$Moist 5.6 0.1 With$Gravel,$Brown/Grey/Yellow,$Moist 5 5.6
0.2 4 110 5.7 0.2 5.7 0.2 6 130 5.7
0.3 5 5.8 0.3 5.8 0.3 5 5.8
0.4 FILL:%Silty%SAND%(SP)$Loose$to$Medium$Dense 5 5.9 0.4 FILL:%Silty%SAND%(SP)$Loose$to$Medium$Dense 5.9 0.4 FILL:%Silty%SAND%(SP)$Loose$to$Medium$Dense 6 5.9
0.5 Brown/Grey,$Moist 6 130 6.0 0.5 Brown/Grey,$Moist 6.0 0.5 Brown/Grey,$Moist 7 160 6.0
0.6 5 6.1 0.6 6.1 0.6 7 6.1
0.7 6 6.2 0.7 6.2 0.7 7 6.2
0.8 6.3 0.8 6.3 0.8 8 180 6.3
0.9 6.4 0.9 6.4 0.9 8 6.4
1.0 6.5 1.0 6.5
To 7.0 Metres
1.0 6.5
1.1 6.6 1.1 6.6
Residential
Residential
Investigate
Inspect &
Investigate
Inspect &
2.8 8.3 2.8 8.3 2.8 BH 3 8.3
2.9 8.4 2.9 slope 1% 8.4
Loose Sand
2.9 8.4
3.0 8.5 3.0 8.5 3.0 8.5
Geotechnical
3.9 9.4
Geotechnical
Assessment
Energy
Assessment
Energy
4.0 Silty%SAND%(SM)$Medium$Dense 9.5 4.0 9.5 4.0 9.5
4.1 Dark$Grey/Brown,$Wet 9.6 4.1 9.6 4.1 9.6
4.2 (watertable$@$4.0m) 9.7 4.2 9.7 4.2 9.7
4.3 9.8
M/Dense Sand
4.3 9.8 4.3 9.8
4.4 9.9 4.4 Silty%SAND%(SM)$Medium$Dense 9.9 4.4 Silty%SAND%(SM)$Medium$Dense 9.9
4.5 10.0 4.5 Dark$Grey/Brown,$Wet 10.0 4.5 Dark$Grey/Brown,$Wet 10.0
M/Dense Sand
4.6 10.1 4.6 10.1
Residential
4.7 10.2
Commercial &
Infrastructure
4.8 Silty%SAND%(SM)$Medium$Dense 10.3 4.8 10.3
4.9 Dark$Grey,$Wet Residential Geotechnical
10.4 Infrastructure
4.8
4.9
10.3
10.4 4.9 10.4
5.0 10.5 5.0 10.5 5.0 10.5
5.1 10.6 5.1 10.6 5.1 10.6
5.2 Inspect & 10.7Energy
Environmental
5.2 Silty%SAND%(SM)$Medium$Dense 10.7 5.2 Silty%SAND%(SM)$Medium$Dense 10.7
Investigate Assessment
Inspect & Energy
Environmental
5.3 Dark$Grey,$Wet 10.8
Commercial &
5.3 10.8
Environmental
Commercial &
5.3 Dark$Grey,$Wet 10.8
Infrastructure
Infrastructure
Environmental
5.4 10.9 5.4 10.9 5.4 10.9
Investigate Assessment
5.5 11.0 5.5 11.0 5.5 11.0
Page 4 of 8
Page 3 of 8
Terms
SITE INVESTIGATION & CLASSIFICATION REPORT
DCP: Dynamic cone penetrometer (blows/100mm)
Site Photo Hs: AS2870 Depth of design soil suction change (mm), or
CLIENT: Blade Pile QLD Pty Ltd HEDRA/QBCC update 2015.
Hc: Depth of cracking (mm)
13 Alex Fisher Drive Ips: Estimated Shrink-swell index (%/pF)
BURLEIGH HEADS QLD 4220 Iss: Shrink-swell index (%/pF)
PP: Pocket penetrometer bearing pressure (kPa)
qa: Allowable bearing pressure (kPa)
JOB NUMBER: 43237-15RS (Revision A) UTP: Unable to penetrate
HWR: Highly weathered rock
BH 1
ys: Characteristic surface movement (mm)
BH 2
SITE ADDRESS: Lot 25, #186 Morala Avenue yt: Potential additional surface movement due to trees (mm)
BH 3
slope 1% RUNAWAY BAY 4216 Laboratory test results
Hs (mm): 1700
H=15m
D=8m DATE: 12 January 2016 Hc (mm): 850
Sample: A
SITE CLASSIFICATION: Class P – due to trees (refer note) Ips (%/pF): 0.1
Class P – due to fill ys (mm): 0 to 5
(class S properties, excluding trees)
yt (mm): 0
Note: house removal, refer note
Page. 25
Pile Loads Issue – More effort is needed to get it right for the client TM
TM
= 100 kN Un-factored
= 75 kN Un-Factored
Providing the wrong pile loads for each location, means the client pays more for piles they don’t need
Page. 26
Specified Pile Loads Solution – Calculated pile loads = Lower piling costs TM
TM
1
1
1
BP
BP
BP
BP
1
BP
= 50 kN ULS PILE
= 37 kN Un-factored
1
1
2
2
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
2
BP
BP
= 75 kN ULS PILE
= 55 kN Un-factored
3
BP
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
BP
BP
BP
BP
= 90 kN ULS PILE
BP
BP
BP
= 67 kN Un-factored
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
2
1
BP
BP
2
1
BP
BP
1
BP
1
BP
BP
1
BP
2
BP
2
BP
BP
BP
2
2
2
BP
BP
BP
1
BP
2
2
2
BP
2
BP
2
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
2
2
2
BP
BP
BP
1
2
BP
BP
1
2
2
BP
BP
BP
BP
1
1
BP
BP
3
3
3
3
3
3
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
BP
Calculating the correct pile load for each location, means the right piles at the right cost for the client
Page. 27
Blade Pile Technical Design Manual – To Ensure Compliance to All Relevant Australian Standards TM
www.bladepile.com - info@bladepilegroup.com.au
This Technical Design Manual (TDM) has been created for use in the
determination, application and design of Blade Piles, Slip Joint Pile Caps,
Piled Slab Systems, Lateral Bracing Piles and connections for
Residential, Commercial, Industrial and Civil Construction projects.
Slab Systems
The Blade Pile Group and its associate company Airformer, have invented & patented the
following.
Blade Pile Group - Pile Cap Slab System (For both Waffle or conventional slabs)
AIR
Airformer Group-
! Blade Slab System – Blade Pod & Blade Plates.
AIR !
! !
Page. 30
Pile Cap Slab System – Waffle Raft Slab, Blade Piles & Slip Joint Pile Cap
Page. 31
Pile Cap Slab System – Conventional Raft Slab, Blade Piles & Slip Joint Pile Cap
)
Page. 32
Pile Cap Slab System – Conventional Raft Slab, Blade Piles & Slip Joint Pile Cap
!
!
!
Page. 33
Page. 34
6. TM
Pile Testing
Blade Pile Group and its associated companies understand the importance of ongoing independent structural & geotechnical
testing of foundation products and are now able to assist other parties in acquiring expert pile testing services.
Independent verification and certification of Blade Pile Group products continues to be carried out by some of Australia’s
leading engineers, testing laboratories and consulting engineering companies.
Some of the parties that have worked with Blade Pile to provide testing include Structerre Consulting Engineers, GHD
Consulting Engineers WA, Aurecon SA, Prompt Certification WA, URS SA, University of South Australia, Griffith University
QLD, ALS Group, Foundations Specialist Group, Alfa Labs QLD and Dr. Peter Mitchell.
The Blade Pile Group and its associated companies have now established pile testing services for other parties. Our group
works directly with certifying engineers in Australia and overseas, to ensure independent, accurate & reliable certification
services that meet all Standards, Building Codes and regulatory requirements.
35Page. 35
© Blade Pile Group Pty Ltd 2015
Test%Stage: 1 Test%Number: 45 Date: 20.08.15 Pile%Type: AM89&External&Array&Pile&@&2500&mm
Site%Address: MSF&Solar&Farm&project,&Moree&NSW
12.00%
Each Test%Load Displacement Geotechnical%Displacement%for%given%Test%Load%
No. kN NGL
6 7.28 0.16
0.16% 0.21%
7 8.32 0.18 6.00%
9 10.40 0.30
0.13%0.14%
4.00%
10 8.32 0.26
0.09%
11 6.24 0.21
12 4.16 0.14
2.00% 0.07%
13 2.08 0.07
14 0.00 0.00
Tension ‘Pull Up’
15 0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.05% 0.10% 0.15% 0.20% 0.25% 0.30% 0.35%
Geotechnical%Displacement%(mm)%
36
BLADE&PILE&TEST&GRAPH&.&Tension&Test&.&vs.22.07.15&
Test%Stage: 3 Test%Number: 131&OM Date: 24.09.15 Pile%Type: OM&Building&114&Pile&&&Dual&350&Blades
120.00%
Each Test%Load Displacement% Geotechnical%Displacement%for%given%Test%Load% 3.74%
No. kN NGL&(mm)
3.40%
0 0.00 0.00
100.00%
1 33.90 1.51
2.95% 3.73%
2 45.20 1.87
2.78%
3 56.50 2.14
80.00%
4 67.80 2.45
2.45% 3.56%
5 79.10 2.78
Test%Load%(kN)%
7 101.70 3.40
1.87% 3.29%
8 113.00 3.74
10 67.80 3.56
2.96%
11 45.20 3.29
20.00%
12 22.60 2.96
13 0.00 2.52
14 0.00% 2.52%
0.00%
15 0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 3.50% 4.00%
Geotechnical%Displacement%(mm)% 37
BLADE&PILE&TEST&GRAPH&.&Compression&Test&.&vs.22.07.15&
Test%Stage: 3 Test%Number: 38 Date: 17.08.15 Pile%Type: AM89&External&Array&Pile&@&2500&mm
Site%Address: Moree&Solar&Farm&project&.&Moree&NSW
Geotechnical%Displacement%(boRom)%for%given%Test%Load%
Geotechnical%
5.00% 7.79%
Each Test%Load Displacement Deflection
4.50%
No. kN Bottom&(mm) Top&(mm) 6.52%
4.00%
Start 0.00 0.00
3.50% 5.62%
50%SLS
1.57 1.80 7.00
Test%Load%(kN)% 3.00%
Rebound 3.75%
0.00 0.28
2.50%
75%SLS
2.35 3.75 15.00 2.00%
1.80%
Rebound
0.00 0.38 1.50%
Rebound 0.50%
0.00 0.46 0.00%0.28%
0.38%
0.46%
0.49%
0.55%
0.00%
125%%SLS 3.92 6.52 24.00
0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00%
Rebound Geotechnical%Displacement%(mm)%
0.00 0.49
3.00% 2.35%
Summary% 2.00% 1.57%
Notes:
1.00%
0%
0.00%
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00%
DeflecUon%at%the%top%of%pile%(mm)%
38
BLADE&PILE&TEST&GRAPH&.&Lateral&Test&.&vs.22.07.15&
Blade Pile – Destruction Testing to Determine & Optimise Geodynamic Performance TM
Ground Penetration Test Moree NSW Extreme Iron Stone Cobble Test Karratha WA
TECHNICAL DETAILS
STATIC LOAD TEST
Test Procedure: TP 230 Test Spec: Client’s Requirements
Client Requirements: Test and report results Acceptance Spec: Client’s Requirements
Material Spec: Grade 350 (Fabricated Parts)
Test Equipment
Equipment: Field Box Equipment No: 480
Equipment: 700 bar Transducer Equipment No: 543
Equipment: 5 tonne Ram Equipment No: 570
Equipment: Laser Distant Measurer Equipment No: 1933
Sample Condition
Time of Test: 01:00pm & 03:00pm, 20 January 2015
Test Restrictions/ Nil
Deviations:
Compliance: Refer Test Results
Page 1 of 9
Weld Limit Testing – Alfa Lab Brisbane QLD High Torque & Speed Impact Test Moree NSW Torque Plastic Limit Test Moree NSW High Torque & Speed Impact Test Moree NSW
This document may not be reproduced except in full.
Form No: R054
Version No: 1
Page. 39
© Blade Pile Group Pty Ltd 2015
7. TM
Certification
• Many piering/piling companies provide certification for foundation works that may not
be compliant if they design outside the relevant Australian Standard or, not verified
that completed works comply with the Engineers design & specification.
• A certificate that only states works were completed & compliant to a given standard,
without a Pile Design Summary Report with calculations to support their pier/pile
design, is incomplete and therefore not acceptable for AS2159 certification.