Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
com
4 Hashikma st. Rishon Le-Zion, Israel. 75201 Tel. 972-3-9643320 Email: info@ardsimplants.com
ISO
0483 13485
Company Profile
Established by Dr. Uri Arny in 2005, ARDS deals with the development,
manufacturing and marketing of innovative dental implants.
2
External Surface
Osseointegration is needed in order to create a durable X500
stabilization of the implant in the bone. In order to intensify the
osseointegration, two processes are required:
The first phase is sand blasting the implant in order to create a
rougher surface area. Generally, cells adhere better onto rough
surfaces. The deep pits created by the blasting procedure, act as
retentive pockets for newly formed bone.
The second phase is coating the implant using bioactive Calcium-
Phosphate.
The sponge-like micro structure of this coating induces an
intense capillary effect for blood and tissue fluids. Thereby it
develops the ambient conditions for the increased adhesion of
the osteoinductive factors contained in these fluids. In addition, X1500
the position of the Ca-Ph crystals towards the implant’s surface
immobilizes the cells responsible for the bone formation.
The result is an expedited osseointegration process (occurring
14-30 days following the implantation). The coating is completely
resorbed in the bone 6-12 weeks after the implantation.
Type of Titanium
ARDS’ implants are composed of medical titanium alloy Ti-6 AL-
4V which retains all manufacturing regulations.
X3000
Manufacturing
ARDS’ implants and reconstruction parts are manufactured at the
company’s production plant, situated at Teffen industrial park in
the north part of Israel. The plant retains a quality control system
and regulations of the highest required level in accordance with
the most severe international approvals.
3
Excellent approval for ARDS Implants from technical
laboratories and NAMSA laboratory, U.S.A.
Testing results - ARDS Implants
Corrosion Biocompatibility
The test was performed by the Technion, The test was performed by NAMSA
Haifa - Test no. B/82454 laboratory in the United States.
• The test examined the resistance of the material There were 3 tests done on laboratory mice
and its corrosion potential. • Toxicity test - toxic potential of the implant
• The test was performed by immersing the • Sensitivity test - sensitivity potential that could be
implant in different chemicals, heating to 37˚ and caused by the implant
submission to electrical currents. • Irritation test - potential irritations of the implant.
Results: Results:
Complete stability of the ARDS Implant - The All three tests proved that the implant
implants are stable and have no corrosion is biocompatible
potential.
The test was performed by the Technion, The test was performed by the Technion,
Haifa - Test no. B/83703 Haifa - Test no. B/83371
The test was performed by an electronic The test was performed on 3.75mm implants, 13mm
microscope (SEM), that is equipped with a in length.
system analysis of chemical elements (EDS). The implants were assembled with angulated
The test was performed by injecting a wet metallic abutments of 25 degrees.
acid on the surface area of the implant, and final The implants were exposed to cyclic forces up to a
cleaning by an organic acid. fraction of one part.
Testing was done in accordance with standards
of ISO 14801 and the FDA regulations.
Results:
Results: In the assembly and the implant
No absorption of foreign materials on the there was NO damage at all.
surface area, and the observed elements The only cracks formed were in the abutment screw
stand up to the highest standards. to the level of 580 neuton, much more than
required.
4
Hybrid Dual Thread Screw Implant -
Analytical and Experimental Research
Dr. Uri Arny, Ilan Weissberg M.Sc & Oved Gihon, Mechanical engineer.
Double Tread
Thin Grove
Single Tread Fig. 3: Artificial Bone Specimen Cross Section (Dimensions in mm>)
Thick Grove
5
Experimental Results shear stress distribution in the cortical bone under an
The experimental tests showed that the HDTS implant axial load of 40 Kg for the both type of implants.
could carry higher axial load compared to classical cylin-
der implants, as shown in figure 4. It is also shown that Discussion & Conclusions
HDTS implant has higher stiffness then the classical cylin- The experimental tests showed that HDTS implant
drical implant. The stiffness of the implants is compatible achieved the highest vertical load capability compared
with measured axial stiffness of 180 Kg/mm published in with a classical cylindrical implant. The unique tests
the literature for Branemark (7 mmº) in trabecular bone. experiments method evaluates in this study provided
These results increase the reliability of the preformed short development time by using artificial bone speci-
experimental tests. men. These experiments were done with a background
of analytical calculations. The lower shear stress values
Analytical Method at the cortical bone evaluate for the HDTS implant com-
Finite Element Model (FEM) of an implant installed in pared with the classical cylindrical implants provides the
a standard jawbone cross section has been built using advantage of the HDTS implant regarding on carrying
NASTRAN FEM software. The aim of this study was to higher loads and increasing life time of the HDTS im-
evaluate the influence of HDTS implant versus classical plant. This phenomenon is mostly due to the innovative
cylindrical implants on the stress intensity and stress dis- implant geometry and bone drilling method.
tribution due to axial load. Two analytical models were
built for the identical specimen types described above.
The Implant stress distribution at the bone cross section
was calculated.
The FEM model of the dental implant bone system used
2-D Plate elements; the model is symmetrical since only
axial (vertical) load had been analyzed, as is shown in
Fig. 5.
Analytical Results
The analytical calculations showed that the HDTS im-
plant have favorable stress distribution over the clas-
sical cylindrical implant. The maximal shear stress level
at the cortical jawbone with HDTS implant is 15% to 25% Fig. 6: The Max Cortical Shear Stress Distribution for the Two Implants Models
lower compared with a classical cylindrical implant, this @ 40 Kg Vertical Load
is shown in Fig 6, which plots the max
References
Lawrence B. Lum,A Biomechanical Rationale for the use
of Short Implants. Journal of Oral Implantology Vol. XVII/
No. Tow/1991 pp126-131
Borchers L. Relchart P. “Three- dimensional stress dis-
tribution around a dental implant at different stages of
interface development”. J. Dent Res 1983 62(2):156-159
Kitoh, M; Matsushita, Y.; Yamautue, S; Ikedda, H.; and
Suetsugu, T. The Stress Distribution of Hydroxyapatite
Implant Under Vertical Load by the Two-Dimensional Fi-
Fig. 4: Implant tests under compression axial load
nite Element Method. Journal of Implantol 14:65-71
Dechow P.C. Naill G.A. Schwartz-Dabney C.L. and Ash-
man R.B., “Elastic properties of the human supraorbital
and mandibular bone”. Am J Phys Anthropol 90, pp 291-
306. 1993.
6
Table of Contents
Implants..........................................................................................................................10
Drills..................................................................................................................................11
Prosthetic Components.....................................................................................................13
Healing Caps..........................................................................................................................13
Abutments..........................................................................................................................14
Overdenture Components.......................................................................................................17
Accessories............................................................................................................................18
Tools.................................................................................................................................19
Prosthetic options..............................................................................................................23
Removable Overdenture.........................................................................................................24
Notes...................................................................................................................................26
7
Packaging
Package contains:
Implant, Healing screw, Leading pin, double-label to allow recording of the used implant on patient’s form.
All implants are packed with mounting tool, no-touch delivery carrier.
All implants are double packed – the outer clean, the inner sterilized.
8
Leading Pin
Leading pin of titanium alloy
Marked 3mm from tip on both sides. Comes with the implant for single use.
Length Code
16mm LP0016
16mm
5.5mm {
9
Implants
Length Code
8mm S37508
3.85mm
11.5mm S37511
13mm S37513
3.75mm
3.2mm
Length Code
8mm S42008
4.2mm
3.75mm
10mm S42010
11.5mm S42011
13mm S42013
4.2mm
3.6mm
Length Code
4.5mm
8mm S45008
3.75mm
10mm S45010
11.5mm S45011
13mm S45013
4.5mm
3.9mm
10
Drills Code
DR0010
Marking
Code
Marking DR0020
2mm
Code
Marking
DR0028
5.5mm
8mm
10mm
11.5mm
13mm
2mm
2.8mm 3mm
Code
Marking
5.5mm
8mm
10mm
11.5mm
13mm
2mm
2.8mm DR0036
3.6mm 3.75mm
Code
Marking
5.5mm
8mm
10mm
11.5mm
13mm
2mm
2.8mm
3.6mm DR0040
4mm 4.2mm
Code
Marking
5.5mm
8mm
10mm
11.5mm
13mm
2mm
2.8mm
3.6mm
4mm DR0042
4.2mm 4.5mm
11
Code
Marking
DR0028
5.5mm
8mm
10mm
11.5mm
13mm
2mm
2.8mm 3mm
Code
Marking
5.5mm
8mm
10mm
11.5mm
13mm
2mm
2.8mm DR0036
3.6mm 3.75mm
Code
Marking
5.5mm
8mm
10mm
11.5mm
13mm
2mm
2.8mm
3.6mm DR0040
4mm 4.2mm
Code
Marking
5.5mm
8mm
10mm
11.5mm
13mm
2mm
2.8mm
3.6mm
4mm DR0042
4.2mm 4.5mm
12
Prosthetic Components
Healing Caps Code
HO3000
Healing Cap for 3mm ARDS implants
Code Code
Code Code
13
Prosthetic Components
Abutments
Code Code
Code Code
Code
A3750T
Narrow Abutment for Front Segment
Code
A30000
Abutment for 3mm ARDS implants
Code Code
A37515 A37525
15deg. Abutment 25deg. Abutment
14
Prosthetic Components
Shoulder and Anatomic Abutments
Abutment made of titanium alloy antirotational
Fits 3.75, 4.2, 4.5 mm implants
15
Prosthetic Components
Ball Attachment Components
Ball attachment with 1mm, 2mm and 3mm neck for 3.75mm, 4.2mm and 4.5mm ARDS Implants
Code
1mm
Code
2mm
Code
3mm
Code
BA3000
Ball Attachment for 3mm ARDS Implants
Code Code
Code Code
16
Prosthetic Components
Overdenture Components
Code
1mm
Code
2mm
Code
3mm
Code
Code
ODS001
17
Prosthetic Components
Accessories
Code
AN3000
Laboratory analog for 3mm ARDS implants.
Code Code
Laboratory analog to be Laboratory analog to be
used with transfer, fits used for overdenture,
3.75mm, 4.2mm, 4.5mm fits 3.75mm, 4.2mm,
implant diameters. AN3750 4.5mm implant AOD375
diameters.
Code Code
TR3750 TR375L
Closed Tray Transfer Open Tray Transfer
Code Code
Code Code
Plastic Sleeve
Plastic Sleeve P3750W for 3mm ODS300
Wide/Single ARDS Implants
18
Tools
Code
BOX001
Surgical Kit
Code
MT0008
Ratchet for ARDS Implants
Code
MT0011
Screw Driver for ARDS implants
19
Length Code
15mm MT0002
7mm MT0001
Ratchet Driver for ARDS implants
Length Code
15mm MT0004
7mm MT0003
Hand Driver for ARDS abutments and screws
Length Code
15mm MT0006
7mm MT0005
Ratchet Driver for ARDS abutments and screws
Code
MT0007
Ratchet Driver for ARDS overdentures
Code Code
20
Bone Substitutes and Membranes
Gen-Os Gel 40
Mix of cancellous and cortical heterologous Collagen gel loaded with 60% bone mix of cancel-
bone with collagen. lous and cortical heterologous bone.
Granulometry : 250 -1000µ (micron) Granulometry ≥ 300µ (micron)
Special Evolution
Translucent dried membrane, Dried heterologous pericardium membrane.
heterologous pericardium. Packaging : 20x20, 25x35
Packeging : 20x20, Xfine Standard or fine
21
Regeneration Type Product 1 Product 2 Possible Alternatives
Post - Extractive Sockets Only if Defect Walls Only if there is In case of Coagulation
Are Preserved Graft Exposure Risk Problems
22
Prosthetic Options
Fixed Removable Overdenture
23
Prosthetic Options
Removable Overdenture
24
Prosthetic Options
Cemented Related Restorations
Prosthetic Options
Fixed Removable Restorations
25
Notes
www.ardsimplants.com
4 Hashikma st. Rishon Le-Zion, Israel. 75201 Tel. 972-3-9643320 Email: info@ardsimplants.com
26