Churchill Park Master Plan

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
www.ghd.com
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
advertised: 06/06/2018
Planning Administration
This document is subject to copyright and is protected by law. In displaying this
document on its website the Council grants website users a non-exclusive licence to
reproduce the document in their web browser for the sole purpose of viewing the
content. The Council reserves all other rights. Documents displayed on the Council's
website are intended for public perusal only and should not be reproduced
without the consent of the copyright owner.
AREA TO BE DEVELOPED TO
ACCOMODATE A CRICKET
GROUND WITH ARTIFICIAL
PITCH & 2 x SOCCER GROUNDS
RETAIN EXISTING
LANDSCAPING WHERE
PRACTICAL
EXISTING SPORTS
FACILITIES / AMENITIES
SOCCER GROUND #2
REMOVE EXISTING
MOUND & LANDSCAPING
PLAY SPACE & BIKE PARKING
SOCCER GROUND #1
REHABILITATE AND
LANDSCAPE EXISTING
HARDSTAND AREAS
SOCCER GROUND #3
EXISTING SPORTS
FACILITIES / AMENITIES
CONSOLIDATE SITE RETAIN EXISTING
EXISTING PATH TO FENCING TO A SINGLE LANDSCAPING WHERE
HENTY STREET PERIMETER FENCE EXISTING BBQ
PRACTICAL
FORMALISED SITE ACCESS

DUAL USE PEDESTRIAN AND
SERVICE VEHICLE PATH
RESTRICT VEHICLE (RESTRICTED ACCESS)
ACCESS RETAIN EXISTING SEAL
EXISTING HARDSTAND &

SERVICE ROADS TO REMAIN
EXISTING SPORTS
FIELDS
REMOVE EXISTING PATH PROPOSED STAGE 3
& REPLACE WITH NEW CARPARK
TURF / LANDSCAPING
EXISTING PATH TO PROPOSED STAGE 1

BURNS STREET CARPARK
PROPOSED STAGE 2
CARPARK
EE
LEV
OD
FLO
NORTH ESK RIVER
DR.
ARK
ILL P
N
RCH
MAR. 2018
CITY OF LAUNCESTON date:
CHU
0 10 20 30 40 50m
CHURCHILL PARK CONCEPT MASTER PLAN SCALE 1:1000 AT ORIGINAL SIZE job no:
drawing:
32-18251
SK001
SITE PLAN
Document Set ID: 3816080
3766772
Version: 2,
1, Version Date: 04/06/2018
27/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
DA 0098/2018
www.ghd.com
Ref. No:
Date
S
S
RETAIN EXISTING GATES
REINSTATE IN NEW POSITION
S
1.50m GRAVEL PATH SW
MOTORCYCLE PARKING
S
SW
DISABLED PARKING
SW
NEW 6.50m WIDE SPRAY
S
SEALED ACCESS ROAD NEW LANDSCAPING
SW
RETAIN EXISTING FENCE
S
SW
BUS / TAXI LAYBY
S
SW NEW 6.50m WIDE SPRAY
SEALED ACCESS ROAD
ON EXISTING CARPARK
S
EXIST. GRAVEL CARPARK
SW 2.00m GRAVEL SHARED PATH
S (1860m²) (PEDESTRIANS & CYCLISTS)
S S
S SW
S
S
S SW
SW
SW
GRAVEL ACCESS ROAD NEW LANDSCAPING
(RESTRICTED AREA) S
SW SW
H
SW EXIST. GRAVEL CARPARK
PAT
(3870m²)
LED
RELOCATE EXIST.
NEW 6.50m WIDE SPRAY
SEA
SW
BOOM GATE
SW SEALED ACCESS ROAD
TING
EXIS
SW
SW
NEW GRAVEL
LEGEND
SW
CARPARK (520m²)
SW
SW NEW GRAVEL CARPARK
SW
NEW GRAVEL CARPARK
SW
(2250m²) NEW LANDSCAPING EXISTING GRAVEL CARPARK
RETAIN EXIST. OPEN SW
DRAIN & STORMWATER EXISTING SPRAY SEALED

SW
INFRASTRUCTURE ACCESS ROAD (UPGRADED)
SW
LANDSCAPING
SW
SW
GRAVEL FOOTPATH
SW
UPGRADE EXISTING SPRAY

SW
SEALED ACCESS ROAD
PARKING SCHEDULE - STAGE 1
SW
MOTOR VEHICLES = 341
DISABLED = 10
EE
MOTORCYCLE = 5
LEV
SW
OD
SW PARKING DIMENSIONS
FLO
CARPARK DIMENSIONS
TING
STALL = 5.40m x 2.50m
AISLE WIDTH = 6.50m
EXIS
NEW ENTRY GATE & SIGNAGE
(IN ACCORDANCE WITH COL
CORPORATE SIGNAGE DESIGN
GUIDELINES) RETAIN EXISTING
ACCESS TO CHURCHILL PARK DRIVE
MAR. 2018
CITY OF LAUNCESTON 0 5 10 15 20 25m
date:
CHURCHILL PARK CONCEPT MASTER PLAN STAGE 1 INDICATIVE CARPARK LAYOU

SCALE 1:500 AT ORIGINAL SIZE job no:
drawing:
32-18251
SK014

3766772
Version: 2,
27/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
www.ghd.com
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
S
S
S
SW
S
SW
SW
S
SW
STAGE 3
S
CARPARK SW
S
SW
S
SW
S
S S
S SW
S
S
S SW
SW
SW
S
SW SW
SW
STAGE 1 CARPARK
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
STAGE 2
CARPARK
SW
SW
LEGEND
SW
NEW GRAVEL CARPARK

SW
SW
SW
SW MOTOR VEHICLES = 80
EE
LEV
SW
OD
SW
MOTOR VEHICLES = 120
FLO
TING
PARKING DIMENSIONS
EXIS
CARPARK DIMENSIONS
STALL = 5.40m x 2.50m
AISLE WIDTH = 6.50m
MAR. 2018
CITY OF LAUNCESTON 0 5 10 15 20 25m
date:
CHURCHILL PARK CONCEPT MASTER PLAN SCALE 1:500 AT ORIGINAL SIZE
STAGES 2 & 3 INDICATIVE CARPARK LAYOUT

job no:
drawing:
32-18251
SK015

3766772
Version: 2,
27/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Launceston City Council

City of Launceston - Churchill Park Additonal Sports Fields
Development Application Submission
February 2018

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Table of contents
1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Purpose of this Report ......................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Report Structure ................................................................................................................... 1
1.3 Accompanying Documents .................................................................................................. 1
1.4 Scope and Limitations.......................................................................................................... 1
2. Site and Surrounds ........................................................................................................................ 2

2.1 Subject Site .......................................................................................................................... 2
2.2 Surrounding Area ................................................................................................................. 6
3. Project Background ........................................................................................................................ 7

3.1 Churchill Park Redevelopment ............................................................................................ 7
3.2 Community Engagement ..................................................................................................... 7
4. Proposal ......................................................................................................................................... 8
4.1 Development Application Plans ........................................................................................... 8
4.2 Proposd Staged program ..................................................................................................... 9
5. Planning Assessment................................................................................................................... 11
5.1 Zoning ................................................................................................................................ 11
5.2 Use Categorisation ............................................................................................................ 11
5.3 Recreation Zone ................................................................................................................ 12
5.4 Open Space Zone .............................................................................................................. 16
5.5 Overlays ............................................................................................................................. 19
5.6 Codes ................................................................................................................................. 21
6. Conclusion.................................................................................................................................... 26
Table index
Table 2-1 Property titles ........................................................................................................................... 2
Table 5-1 Use classes ............................................................................................................................ 12
Figure index
Figure 2-1 Subject site ............................................................................................................................. 2
Figure 2-2 CT 154196/1 Showing area of sportsground (green) on north western boundary
extending across title boundary ........................................................................................... 3
Figure 2-3 CT 50435/1 Showing area of sportsground (green) on south eastern boundary
extending across title boundary ........................................................................................... 4
Figure 2-4 Site photographs ..................................................................................................................... 6
Figure 4-1 Churchill Park Concept Master Plan ..................................................................................... 10

Figure 5-1 Zoning map ........................................................................................................................... 11
Figure 5-2 Precinct Map ......................................................................................................................... 20
GHD | Report for Launceston City Council - City of Launceston - Churchill Park Additonal Sports Field, 3218251 | i
3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Appendices
Appendix A – Development Application Plans
Appendix B – Surface Water and Sediment Investigation by Pitt & Sherry 2014
GHD | Report for Launceston City Council - City of Launceston - Churchill Park Additonal Sports Field, 3218251 | ii
3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
1. Introduction
1.1 Purpose of this Report
GHD has been engaged by the City of Launceston to prepare this report and to co-ordinate the
preparation of a Development Application for the construction of additional sports fields and
associated car park facility at Churchill Park. The report provides an assessment of the proposal
against the requirements of the Launceston Interim Planning Scheme 2015 (the ‘Scheme’).
1.2 Report Structure

The report has been structured to provide background to the proposal and an assessment
against the applicable Interim Planning Scheme provisions. Section 2 examines the
characteristics of the existing site and surrounds. Section 3 provides a background to the
project. Section 4 details the proposed use and development. The planning assessment is
provided in Section 5.
1.3 Accompanying Documents

This report references the following documentation:
 Appendix A – Drawings prepared by GHD including SK001 Site Plan, SK002 Sports Fields,
SK 003 Car Park, and SK006 Landscape Plan.
 Appendix B – Surface Water and Sediment Investigation by Pitt & Sherry 2014.
1.4 Scope and Limitations

This report has been prepared by GHD for the City of Launceston and may only be used and
relied on for the purposes of undertaking a planning assessment. GHD otherwise disclaims
responsibility to any person other than City of Launceston arising in connection with this report.
GHD also excludes implied warranties and conditions, to the extent legally permissible.

3747740 GHD | Report for Launceston City Council - City of Launceston - Churchill Park Additonal Sports Field, 3218251 | 1
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
2. Site and Surrounds

2.1 Subject Site
2.1.1 Location
Churchill Park is a sporting field complex located at Heritage Forest. Access is gained off
Invermay Road via Forster Street and Churchill Park Drive. Churchill Park plays a significant
role as the home of the Northern Tasmanian Junior Soccer Association, and the Northern
Tasmanian Softball Association. During summer AFL Tas and North Launceston FC use the
fields for preseason training, and the Launceston Dog Club are weekend users, although not of
the sports fields.
Figure 2-1 Subject site
2.1.2 Title Information
The titles and other legal land parcels associated with Churchill Park impacted by the
development of the additional sporting fields are identified in Table 2-1.
Table 2-1 Property titles
Title Property Ownership

CT 154196/1 Churchill Park City of Launceston
CT 50435/1 Churchill Park/Heritage City of Launceston
Forest

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
The redevelopment involves land associated with both titles by virtue of a small encroachment
onto CT 50435/1, as demonstrated in Figure 2-2.
Figure 2-2 CT 154196/1 Showing area of sportsground (green) on north

western boundary extending across title boundary

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Figure 2-3 CT 50435/1 Showing area of sportsground (green) on south eastern

boundary extending across title boundary
However, this encroachment across title boundaries is of little consequence given common
ownership of the land by the City of Launceston.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
2.1.3 Site Description
Churchill Park has developed over the years as home for a number of sporting activities, with
development of grassed sports fields, informal playing areas, an artificial hockey pitch (now
used for parking due to problems with differential settling of the land), recreation trails and
paths, landscaping, and related informal car parking.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Figure 2-4 Site photographs

(Source: Report Author)
2.2 Surrounding Area

Churchill Park is located in a highly modified landscape. The North Esk River Levee to the east
of the sportsgrounds is elevated significantly above the subject site. To the north east a
community garden operates, a project jointly supported by the City of Launceston and the
Migrant Resource Centre. Council’s former Parks and Recreation depot is located to the west,
and along the southern boundary Commercial zoned land and a small section of General
Residential zoned land abuts the subject site.
Access to Churchill Park is via Invermay Road, Forster Street past the Launceston
showgrounds and then into Churchill Park Drive. The areas to the north abutting Forster Street
are residential in character and reflected in its General Residential zoning. This zoning
transitions into Light Industrial zoned land and then small pockets of Commercial zoned land
adjacent to Churchill Park.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
3. Project Background
3.1 Churchill Park Redevelopment
The Churchill Park Sports Fields precinct redevelopment is an initiative of the City of
Launceston Natural Environment Department. The following criteria was used to guide
development of the master plan.
 Increased playing field space and provision for additional sports to utilise the playing fields,
particularly through the summer months (refer Section 2.1 below);
 Provide a central dual use pedestrian path and service vehicle access road to the sites
facilities;
 Relocation of all site parking to the southern side of the sports fields precinct;
 Formalise site parking and access in designated areas;
 Improve site amenity through the removal of internal site fencing and unused hardstand
areas; and
 Consider relevant users of the Churchill Park site, not only users of the sports fields (e.g.
the dog club).
3.2 Community Engagement
3.2.1 Public Notification
Public notification will occur in light of a number of discretionary aspects to the proposed
development of additional sporting fields and car park.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
4. Proposal
4.1 Development Application Plans
The master plan proposes the staged redevelopment of the complex incorporating new car park
areas, upgraded and extended site access road, pedestrian and cyclist pathways and ultimately
the development of three new soccer fields and a new cricket oval with artificial pitches,
additional landscaping and related facilities. The staged development is described below but in
detail, the master plan for the redevelopment will include:
 2 x soccer fields measuring 100 m x 64 m. Located to the north west of the existing NTJSA
sports building, the soccer grounds replace a previously used artificial hockey ground that
is currently used for car parking;
 Superimposed on the above soccer fields is a 128 m – 138 m diameter cricket oval with
synthetic pitch;
 A third soccer pitch measuring 100 m x 55 m to the south west of soccer fields 1 and 2
above;
 A second cricket pitch between soccer field 2 and 3;

 Adjacent soccer field 1 is a proposed play space area and facilities for bike parking;
 Access to the above sports fields will be via an upgraded existing access;
 Redeveloped and new car parking areas with approximately 550 spaces, consolidating all
existing parking to one area south of the existing playing fields;
 The car park makes provision for disability spaces, bus/taxi layby, internal pedestrian
pathways linking to a 2.0 m shared pedestrian and cyclist path;
 The existing access road adjacent to the existing and proposed gravel car park will be
upgraded to match the levels of the new carpark and surfaced with a new bitiminious seal.;
 New sections of 6.5m wide bitiminious sealed access roads adjacent the existing and
proposed car parking areas;
 The car park will be gravelled and without linemarking. It will be developed in three (3)
stages, with the size and shape of each stage being designed to accommodate formal
linemarking should a sealed surface be added at a later date. Parking spaces for people
with disabilities will be adequately marked and signed;
 Existing vegetation and trees will be retained where practical (Eucalyptus globulus - blue
gums), an existing open drain will be retained along the southern boundary, and stormwater
from the new car park will be directed to Council’s existing open stormwater drain network;
 Consolidating site fencing to a single perimeter fence;
 Existing landscaping enhanced as appropriate and new areas developed in accordance

with the plans;
 New pedestrian and cycle paths developed;

 New entry gate and sign at the Churchill Park Drive entrance.
The overall development concept is shown in Figure 4-1 below, with full documentation provided
in Appendix A.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
4.2 Proposd Staged program

The project will proceed in stages as funding permits as follows:
STAGE 1 (funding committed) will include:
 the development of the new gravel carpark adjacent the existing carpark at the site’s entry
– with an extension to the west and an extension to the east;
 the extension and upgrade of the existing site access road looping the existing and new
expanded car park area including the application of bitiminious seal at the western end
incorporating a bus and taxi layby; gravel shared path for pedestrians and cyclists and
associated landscaping.
STAGE 2 will include:
 the development of a gravel carpark on the southern side of the site access road.
STAGE 3 will include:
 the development of a new gravel carpark and associated access to the west of the site
access road.
LATER STAGES will include the development of the new sports pitches, as funding permits
and only when all new carparking areas have been developed. In this regard it is important to
note that the existing carparking within the area of the proposed sports grounds (north west of
the baseball diamond) will be retained to ensure parking demand is met in the interim.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Figure 4-1 Churchill Park Concept Master Plan

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
5. Planning Assessment
The following provides an assessment of the application against the relevant provisions of the
Launceston Interim Planning Scheme 2015 (the Scheme).
5.1 Zoning
The subject site is situated partly within the Recreation and Open Space zones as identified in
Figure 5-1.
Figure 5-1 Zoning map

Base image from theLIST (www.thelist.tas.gov.au). © State of Tasmania.
5.2 Use Categorisation

The proposed works within the subject site are categorised as ‘sport and recreation’ under
Table 8.2 of the Scheme as shown in Table 5-1 below. The proposal to develop additional
sports fields and related facilities, including formalised car parking, is entirely consistent with the
use classification. With respect to the car parking, Cl 8.2.2 provides for “a use or development
that is directly associated with and a subservient part of another use on the same site must be
categorised into the same use class as that other use. Patrons of the sporting facilities and
visitors to the site will benefit from a formalised car park. Churchill Park is an important and
well-used sports field complex and during peak usage caters for significant numbers of
spectators and their vehicles.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
The new car park consolidates existing spaces scattered across the complex into one area,
which will consist of an unsealed gravelled surface and drainage infrastructure.
The proposed use is permitted in the Recreation zone, and discretionary in the Open Space
zone.
Table 5-1 Use classes
Use Definition Status

Sport and Use of land for organised or competitive recreation or Permitted in
recreation sporting purposes including associated clubrooms. Recreation
Examples include a bowling alley, fitness centre, firing Zone,
range, golf course or driving range, gymnasium, outdoor Discretionary in
recreation facility, public swimming pool, race course and Open Space
sports ground. Zone.
5.3 Recreation Zone

The zone applies to the majority of the area to be developed within the subject site with the
exception of a small portion of the cricket oval and related run-off areas that encroach into CT
9633/1 as previously shown in Fig 2.2.
5.3.1 Zone Purpose
18.1.1.1 To provide for a range of active and organised recreational use or development and
complementary uses that do not impact adversely on the recreational use of the
land.
18.1.1.2 To provide for the amenity of residential uses on land adjoining the zone.
The redeveloped Churchill Park will enhance the existing sports complex and enable clubs that
use the facilities, and Council who operates the complex to better cater for their needs. There is
a demonstrated need for additional playing fields. The consolidation of parking into a single
location will enhance safety of pedestrians, particularly the children and youth who attend the
grounds, while nearby residents should have improved amenity with a minimum 13m setback
from upgraded parking facilities, additional landscaping, and management of storm water.
5.3.2 Use Standards
In accordance with Table 18.3, Clauses 18.3.1 to 18.3.4 apply to the sports and recreation use
class. The sports and recreation use class is ordinarily permitted and therefore is deemed to be
consistent with the zone provisions.
18.3.1 Hours of operation

Objective: To ensure that uses do not cause unreasonable loss of amenity to nearby sensitive
uses.
Acceptable Solutions Performance Criteria

A1 Operating hours, except for office P1 Uses must not unreasonably impact on the
and administrative tasks, must be amenity of nearby sensitive uses, having regard to:
between: (a) the nature and intensity of the proposed use;
(a) 8.00am and 10.00pm adjacent to (b) the characteristics and frequency of any
the boundary of the General emissions generated;
Residential, Inner Residential, Low (c) the extent and timing of traffic generation;
Density Residential Urban Mixed Use
(d) the hours of delivery and despatch of goods and
and Village zones; or
materials; and
(b) 6.00am to midnight otherwise
(e) the existing levels of amenity.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Complies with A1
No change anticipated in relation to existing operating hours of Churchill Park, which in any
event complies with the operating hours specified in (a) above. Current hours of operation
are:
Soccer
 Monday training until 7.00 pm
 Tuesday training until 6.30 pm
 Wednesday no use currently
 Thursday occasional use during the day
 Friday competition until 9.00 pm
 Saturday competition until 6.00 pm
 Sunday competition and training until 1.00 pm
Softball
 Monday – Friday 2 nights/week (flexible on days) until 7.00 pm
 Saturday competition until 6.00 pm
While the boom gate at the entrance to Churchill Park can be locked it is generally left open,
however, the gate to the sporting fields is locked outside the above specified hours.
18.3.2 Mechanical plant and equipment

Objective: To ensure that the use of mechanical plant and equipment does not cause an
unreasonable loss of amenity to sensitive uses.

A1 Air conditioning, air extraction, P1 Noise, odours, fumes or vibration generated must
heating or refrigeration systems not cause unreasonable loss of amenity to adjoining or
or compressors must be immediately opposite sensitive uses, having regard to:
designed, located, baffled or (a) the characteristics and frequency of any emissions
insulated to prevent noise, generated;
odours, fumes or vibration from (b) the nature of the proposed use;
being received by adjoining or
(c) the topography of the site;
immediately opposite sensitive
uses. (d) the landscaping of the site; and
(e) any mitigation measures proposed.
Not applicable
No air conditioning, extraction, heating or refrigeration systems are proposed.
18.3.3 Light spill and illumination

Objective: To ensure that light spill and levels of illumination from external lighting does not
cause unreasonable loss of amenity to sensitive uses

A1 The use must: P1 Floodlighting or other external lighting used on the site
(a) not include permanent, must not cause an unreasonable loss of amenity to nearby
fixed floodlighting where the sensitive uses, having regard to:
zone adjoins the boundary of (a) the number of light sources and their intensity;
the General Residential, (b) the proximity of the proposed light sources to nearby
Inner Residential, and Low sensitive uses;
Density Residential zones; (c)the topography of the site;
and
(d) the landscaping of the site;
(b) contain direct light from
(e) the degree of screening between the light source and
external light sources within
the sensitive uses; and
the boundaries of the site.
(f) existing light sources nearby.
Not Applicable
No additional or new lighting proposed as part of the redevelopment.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
18.3.4 External storage of goods

Objective: To ensure that external storage of goods, materials and waste does not detract from
the amenity of the area.

A1 Storage of goods P1 Storage of goods and materials, other than for retail sale, or
and materials, other waste must be located or screened to minimise its impact on views
than for retail sale, or into the site from any roads or public open space, adjoining the site,
waste must not be having regard to:
visible from any road (a) the nature of the use;
or public open space (b) the type of goods, materials or waste proposed to be stored;
adjoining the site.
(c) the topography of the site;
(d) the landscaping of the site; and
(e) any screening proposed.
Not applicable
There will be no change in relation to operation of existing facilities at Churchill Park. The
existing NTJSA buildings remain unaltered, although the concept master plan shows the
location of ‘potential future storage’. This will be subject of a separate DA.
5.3.3 Development Standards
The following development standards that apply in accordance with Table 18.4 of the Scheme
are addressed below.
18.4.1 Building height, setback and siting
Objective: To ensure that building bulk and form, and siting:
(a) accommodates sport and recreation uses;
(b) Is compatible with the streetscape and character of the surrounding area; and
(c) protects the amenity of adjoin lots and surrounding uses.

A1 Building height P1 Building height must be compatible with the streetscape and
must be no greater character of the surrounding area, having regard to:
than 7m. (a) the topography of the site;
(b) the height of buildings on the site, adjoining lots and adjacent
lots;
(c) the requirements of the proposed use;
(d) the bulk and form of existing and proposed buildings;
(e) the allowable building heights;
(f) the apparent height when viewed from roads and public places;
(g) sunlight to private open space and windows of habitable rooms
on adjoining lots;
(h) the privacy to adjoining private open space and windows of
habitable rooms on adjoining lots;
(i) any existing screening or the ability to implement screening;
and
(j) any overshadowing of adjacent lots or public places.
Not applicable
No new buildings are proposed.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
18.4.2 Landscaping
Objective: To ensure that development is landscaped to be compatible with recreational uses
of the site and the character of the surrounding area.

A1 P1
If for:
(a) no permit required Development must be landscaped to reduce the impact on the site
uses; or and surrounding area, having regard to:
(b) an extension or (a) location and height of retaining walls;
alteration to a (b) the existing vegetation and its retention where it is feasible to do
permitted use that so;
does not require the (c) the location of any proposed buildings, driveways, car parking,
removal of existing storage areas, signage and utility services;
vegetation.
(d) proposed height and type of fencing;
(e) proposed vegetation plantings;
(f) the location of pedestrian movement routes;
(g) maintenance of plantings, weed management and soil and
water management; and
(h) the character of the surrounding area;as shown in a detailed
landscaping plan
Meets Performance Criteria
The Landscape Plan SK006 shows retained vegetation, areas of vegetation removed, and
new plantings. A key aspect of the plan is the retention of the existing E. globulus (Blue
Gums) in the area adjacent to the residential properties to the south of Churchill Park. In
combination with the 13 m – 19 m setback of the proposed carpark to this boundary, the
amenity of these properties is protected. Development of soccer ground 3 requires removal
of vegetation associated with previously landscaped areas, while a number of gums located
in the area currently used for informal parking near the main entrance will also be removed.
Additional plantings along the main gated access road is also proposed, as well as within the
proposed carpark.
Specifically, the performance criteria is satisfied as follows:
(a) Only six residential properties share a boundary with Churchill Park, with houses
oriented to Guant Street. There are no structures proposed that will affect their amenity.
(b) As described above and as shown in SK006 much of the existing vegetation on the site
is retained.
(c) As for (a) above there are no structures or other development proposed in proximity to
the shared boundary. Indeed the significant setback between the car park and adjacent
houses will ensure there is no impact on their amenity as a result of the proposed
development.
(d) No new fencing is proposed.
(e) New vegetation will have no impact on neighbouring houses.
(f) Additional pedestrian paths are not located in proximity to neighbouring houses.
Pedestrian movement from Churchill Park into the adjacent neighbourhood is already
facilitated with a path into Burns Street, and no change to this arrangement is proposed.
(g) Management of Churchill Park is a Council responsibility.
(h) The character of the surrounding area is not be impacted by the proposed landscaping.
18.4.3 Lot size and dimensions

Objective: To ensure:
(a) the area and dimensions of lots are appropriate for the zone; and
(b) adjoining land, especially residential zones, is protected from adverse impacts.
Not applicable because the proposal does not involve subdivision.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
18.4.4 Frontage and access

Objective: To ensure that lots provide:
(a) appropriate frontage to a road; and
(b) safe appropriate access suitable for the intended use of the new lot.

18.4.5 Discharge of stormwater
Objective: To ensure that the subdivision layout, including roads, provides that stormwater is
satisfactorily drained and discharged.
18.4.6 Water and Sewerage Services
Objective: To ensure each lot provides for appropriate water supply and wastewater disposal.
5.4 Open Space Zone

The zone applies to a small portion of the subject site where the cricket oval and related run-off
areas encroach into CT 9633/1 as previously shown in Figure 2-2.
5.4.1 Zone Purpose

19.1.1 Zone Purpose Statements
19.1.1.1 To provide land for open space purposes including for passive recreation and natural
or landscape amenity.
Complies: The expansion of Churchill Park sports fields into a small portion of land zoned Open
Space will not be detrimental to the objective to retain areas for its landscape amenity. The
encroachment occurs due to the need to superimpose a cricket oval over the proposed soccer
pitches for use during summer rosters. The encroachment of the oval itself is minor, no more
than a metre or two, while the run-off spaces beyond will essentially remain as grassed areas.
The zone purpose is not diminished in any way by the proposed development.
5.4.2 Use Standards
In accordance with Table 19.3, Clauses 19.3.1 to 19.3.6 apply to the sports and recreation use
class. The sports and recreation use class is discretionary and demonstration of its ability to
meet the zone provisions is required.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
19.3.1 Hours of operation

Objective: To ensure that uses do not cause unreasonable loss of amenity to nearby sensitive
uses.

A1 Operating hours, except for office P1 Uses must not unreasonably impact on the
and administrative tasks, must be amenity of nearby sensitive uses, having regard
between: to:
(a) 8.00am and 10.00pm adjacent (a) the nature and intensity of the proposed
to the boundary of the General use;
Residential, Inner Residential, Low (b) the characteristics and frequency of any
Density Residential, Urban Mixed emissions generated;
Use and Village zones; or (c) the extent and timing of traffic generation;
(b) 6.00am to midnight otherwise. (d) the hours of delivery and despatch of
goods and materials; and
(e) the existing levels of amenity.
Complies with A1
No change anticipated in relation to existing operating hours of Churchill Park, which in any
event complies with the operating hours specified. Refer to the description provided for the
Recreation Zone above.
19.3.2 Mechanical plant and equipment

Objective: To ensure that the use of mechanical plant and equipment does not cause an
unreasonable loss of amenity to sensitive uses.
Not applicable because mechanical plant and equipment are not proposed.
19.3.3 Light spill and illumination
Objective: To ensure that light spill and levels of illumination from external lighting does not
cause unreasonable loss of amenity to sensitive uses.
Not applicable as additional or new lighting is not proposed in the development.

19.3.4 External storage of goods
Objective: To ensure that external storage of goods, materials and waste does not detract from
the amenity of the area.
Not applicable as there is no change proposed in relation to operation of existing facilities at

Churchill Park. The existing NTJSA buildings remain unaltered, although the concept master
plan shows the location of ‘potential future storage’. This will be subject of a separate DA
19.3.5 Commercial vehicle parking
Objective: To ensure that parking of commercial vehicles does not detract from the amenity of
the area.
Not applicable because there is no provision for commercial vehicles proposed.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
19.3.6 Open space character

Objective: To ensure that uses are of an appropriate scale for the zone.

A1 If for: P1 The use must be of a scale that is appropriate to the purpose of
(a) no permit required the zone, having regard to:
uses; or (a) the impact on the natural landscape or open space values of the
(b) a combined gross site;
floor area not (b) the impact on the passive recreation values of the site;
exceeding 250 m2 (c) the topography of the site;
over the site. (d) impact on the character of the area; and
(e) other uses on the site.
Complies with the A1
There are no buildings proposed as part of the development.
5.4.3 Development Standards
The development standards that apply in accordance with Table 19.4 of the Scheme are
addressed below.
19.4.1 Building height, setback and siting
Objective: To ensure that building bulk and form, and siting:
(a) is compatible with the character of the surrounding area;
(b) protects the amenity of adjoining lots and surrounding uses; and
(c) respects the natural and landscape values of the site.

A1 Building height must P1 Building height must be compatible with the character of the
be no greater than 5m surrounding area, and protect the amenity of adjoining lots and
surrounding uses, having regard to:
(a) the topography of the site;
(b) height of buildings on the site, adjoining lots and adjacent lots;
(c) the natural and landscape values of the site;
(d) the bulk and form of existing and proposed buildings;
(e) the allowable building heights;
(f) the apparent height when viewed from roads and public
places;
(g) sunlight to private open space and windows of habitable
rooms on adjoining lots;
(h) the privacy to private open space and windows of habitable
rooms on adjoining lots;
(i) the existing screening or the ability to implement screening;
and
(j) any overshadowing of adjacent lots or public places.
Not applicable
No new buildings are proposed.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
19.4.2 Landscaping
Objective: To ensure that development is landscaped to retain the natural values of the site
and contributes to the broader landscape of the area.

A1 If for no permit required uses P1 Development must be landscaped to respect the
natural values of the site and the broader landscape of
the area, having regard to:
(a) location and height of retaining walls;
(b) the existing vegetation and its retention where it is
feasible to do so;
(c) the location of any proposed buildings, driveways,
car parking, storage areas, signage and utility
services;
(d) proposed height and type of fencing;
(e) proposed vegetation plantings;
(f) the location of pedestrian movement routes;
(g) maintenance of plantings, weed management and
soil and water management; and
(h) the character of the surrounding area;
as shown in a detailed landscaping plan.
Complies with the P1
Refer to the description provided for the Recreation Zone above.
19.4.3 Lot size and dimensions

Objective: To ensure:
(c) the area and dimensions of lots are appropriate for the zone; and
(d) adjoining land, especially residential zones, is protected from adverse impacts.

19.4.4 Frontage and access
Objective: To ensure that lots provide:
(c) appropriate frontage to a road; and
(d) safe appropriate access suitable for the intended use of the new lot.

19.4.5 Discharge of stormwater
Objective: To ensure that the subdivision layout, including roads, provides that stormwater is
satisfactorily drained and discharged.
19.4.6 Water and Sewerage Services
Objective: To ensure each lot provides for appropriate water supply and wastewater disposal.
5.5 Overlays
5.5.1 Code E16.0 Invermay/Inveresk Flood Inundation Area Code
The subject site is located within an Overlay Area, which in turn calls up E16.0
Invermay/Inveresk Flood Inundation Area Code.
E16.2.1 Application of this code specifies that it applies to use and development, including
subdivision, on land shown within the Invermay/Inveresk Innundation Area on the planning
scheme overlay maps. The subject land is located in Precinct 6 Recreational, as shown below:

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Figure 5-2 Precinct Map
However, E16.4.1 Use or development exempt from this code provides that ‘non-habitable’
buildings are exempt from the provisions of the code. There are no habitable buildings
proposed with the development of sports fields and car park and on this basis the code does not
apply.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
5.6 Codes
5.6.1 E2.0 Potentially Contaminated Land Code
The Code is relevant because the application involves a ‘sports and recreation’ use and
excavation works, and because there is record of potentially contaminating activities (former
refuse site) at Churchill Park/Heritage Forest. The Code is relevant to both parcels, CT
151196/1 and CT 9633/1, which forms part of the subject site. A Surface Water and Sediment
Investigation by Pitt & Sherry in 2014 (Appendix B) indicates there is no evidence of leachates
impacting nearby waterways nor evidence of contamination in sediment samples taken around
the subject site.
E2.5.1 Suitability for intended use
Objective: To ensure that potentially contaminated land is suitable for the intended use.

A1 The Director, or a person P1 Land is suitable for the intended use, having regard to:
approved by the Director for (a) an environmental site assessment that demonstrates
the purpose of this Code: there is no evidence the land is contaminated; or
(a) certifies that the land (b) an environmental site assessment that demonstrates
is suitable for the intended that the level of contamination does not present a risk to
use; or human health or the environment; or
(b) approves a plan to (c) a plan to manage contamination and associated risk
manage contamination to human health or the environment that includes:
and associated risk to (i) an environmental site assessment;
human health or the
(ii) any specific remediation and protection measures
environment that will
required to be implemented before any use commences;
ensure the land is suitable
and
for the intended use.
(iii) a statement that the land is suitable for the intended
use.
Complies with the P1(b) & (c)
The Surface Water & Sediment Investigation by Pitt & Sherry in Appendix B satisfies the
requirement for an (ESA). The ESA confirms that there is no leachate leaking from the former
landfill at Heritage Forest. The report does recommend further actions which go some way to
satisfying P1 (c) in its recommendation that:
(1) Regular checks of the drainage lines around the site to observe changes in colour or
odour in the surface waters or any dying vegetation around the waterways, which may
indicate leachate is leaking.
(2) If any works are to occur on the site and rubbish is intercepted, work should be stopped
and the coordinates of the area recorded to allow future remediation or monitoring to
target historical filling of areas.
(3) Any soil containing rubbish should be sampled and analysed as per Environment
Protection Authority guidelines prior to offsite disposal to ensure that any environmental
risks can be adequately controlled and managed.
Further to the above additional testing of soil and water samples in June 2015 revealed that
the site is suitable for public open space use, and more intrusive sampling or test pitting of
the playing fields may be appropriate to confirm depth of topfill and presence/absence of any
fill materials. Any excavation for drains or other infrastructure is an ideal opportunity to
record soil depths and presence or otherwise of landfill material. This is recommended as a
permit condition.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
E2.6.2 Excavation
Objective: To ensure that works involving excavation of potentially contaminated land does not
adversely impact on human health or the environment.

A1 No acceptable P1 Excavation does not adversely impact on health and the
solution. environment, having regard to:
(a) an environmental site assessment that demonstrates
there is no evidence the land is contaminated; or
(b) an environmental site assessment that demonstrates that
the level of contamination does not present a risk to human
health or the environment; or
(c) a plan to manage contamination and associated risk to
human health and the environment that includes:
(i) an environmental site assessment;
(ii) any specific remediation and protection measures
required to be implemented before excavation commences;
and
(iii) a statement that the excavation does not adversely
impact on human health or the environment.
Complies with the P1(b) & (c)
As noted above. Development of the sports fields and carpark involves little in the way of
excavation. Given the site is already flat, the only excavation necessary relates to installation
of stormwater drains and reticulated water infrastructure. Otherwise fill and re-contouring to
create the new sports fields is proposed. A Construction Management Plan would be
warranted to deal with this aspect of the proposed development.
5.6.2 E6.0 Parking and Sustainable Transport Code
This code applies to all use and development. There are no exemptions to the code. The
relevant provisions are addressed below.
E6.5.1 Number of Car Parking Spaces
Objective: To ensure that an appropriate level of car parking is provided to meet the needs of
the use.

A1 The number of car parking P1 The number of car parking spaces for other than
spaces must The number of residential uses, must be provided to meet the reasonable
car parking spaces must: needs of the use, having regard to:
(a) not be less than 90% of the (a) the availability of off-road public car parking
requirements of Table E6.1 spaces within reasonable walking distance;
(except for dwellings in the
General Residential Zone); or (b) the ability of multiple users to share spaces
because of:
(b) not be less than 100% of
the requirements of Table (i) variations in car parking demand
E6.1 for dwellings in the over time; or
General Residential Zone; or (ii) efficiencies gained by consolidation
(c) not exceed the of car parking spaces;
requirements of Table E6.1
by more than 2 spaces or 5% (c) the availability and frequency of public transport
whichever is the greater, within reasonable walking distance of the site;
except for dwellings in the (d) any site constraints such as existing buildings,
General Residential Zone; or slope, drainage, vegetation and landscaping;
(d) be in accordance with an
(e) the availability, accessibility and safety of on-
acceptable solution contained
road parking, having regard to the nature of the
within a parking precinct plan.
roads, traffic management and other uses in the
vicinity;

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date

(f) an assessment of the actual car parking
demand determined in light of the nature of the
use and development;
(g) the effect on streetscape; and
(h) the recommendations of any traffic impact
assessment prepared for the proposal; or
P1.2
The number of car parking spaces for residential uses must
be provided to meet the reasonable needs of the use,
having regard to:
(a) the intensity of the use and car parking required;
(b) the size of the dwelling and the number of
bedrooms; and
(c) the pattern of parking in the locality; or
P1.3
The number of car parking spaces complies with any
relevant parking precinct plan.
Table E6.1 sets the requirement for car parking based on the number of spectators. For
‘sports and recreation’, it requires:
1 space per 5 spectators.
It appears that the provisions have been drafted specifically for more formal sports and
recreation uses, perhaps where grandstands are provided, rather than the less formal
outdoors sports fields characterised by Churchill Park. The proposal includes no gross floor
area and no fixed seats specific to the sports and recreation use.
An alternative approach has been adopted to demonstrate that the capacity of the car park is
sufficient, based on survey, to cater for the intended use of an expanded Churchill Park.
In summary, compliance with P1 is addressed as follows:
(a) There is no off-road public car parking within reasonable walking distance.
(b) Shared parking is not applicable as the car park serves only a single use.
(c) There are no transport stops within reasonable walking distance.
(d) The proposed car park is designed to maximise car parking supply without removal of
existing fencing, sports ovals and vegetation.
(e) On-road parking is not relied upon. Notwithstanding, there is a moderate supply of 90
degree angle parking available on Churchill Park Drive near the site (approximately 30
spaces).
(f) Actual car parking was determined on traffic surveys on Churchill Park Drive. On a
typical Saturday, the maximum parking accumulation within the site is around 428
vehicles (at 12.00 pm). Parking accumulation is over 380 for 3 hours between 10.00 am
and 1.00 pm. The ideal parking supply was calculated at 500 spaces, based on the
following formula: peak demand = 85% of total supply. Accounting for 10 years growth
at 1.0% pa., the minimum parking supply is 550 car parking spaces. It is noted that the
existing car park north west of the baseball diamond within the area of the proposed
new sports grounds will be retained until all new staged car parking works are complete
so as to ensure that parking demand for ongoing use of the site is met.
(g) Provision of further parking will require removal of existing trees.
(h) The above assessment, undertaken by a GHD traffic engineer, was taken into account
by Council in establishing the design criteria for the project.
(i) While this application proposes only an unsealed, gravelled car park with no
linemarking, estimates of the number of car spaces that could be accommodated in
stages 1 and 2 of the proposed car park, if it were a sealed car park and linmarked,
indicates approximately 550 car spaces. The proposed gravel car park will have
sufficient space as per the above requirements.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
E6.5.2 Bicycle parking numbers

Objective: To ensure that an appropriate level of bicycle parking spaces are provided to meet
the needs of the use.

A1 The number of bicycle P1 Bicycle parking spaces must be provided to meet the
parking spaces must be reasonable needs of the use, having regard to:
provided on either the (a) the likely number and characteristics of users of the site
site or within 50m of the and their opportunities and likely need to travel by bicycle;
site in accordance with (b) the location of the site and the likely distance a cyclist
the requirements of needs to travel to reach the site; and
Table E6.1.
(c) the availability and accessibility of existing and planned
parking facilities for bicycles in the vicinity.
As above for car parking. Provision has been made for bicycle parking in an area to the
north east of ‘soccer ground 2’ for up to 50 bicycles (25 hoops).
E6.5.3 to E6.5.4 Taxi and motorcycle parking

Not applicable because Table E6.1 does not generate a requirement for car parking because a
floor area and fixed seating is not proposed for the sports and recreation use, however, a bus
layby has been provided within which taxis can deliver or pick up customers.
E6.5.5 Loading bays
Not applicable because a gross (building) floor area is not proposed.
E6.6.5 Bicycle facilities and E6.6.6 Bicycle parking and storage facilities
Not applicable because these provisions relate to uses that require 5 or more bicycle spaces,
and implies catering for more permanent uses e.g. office workers and the like.

A1 On-site car parking is: P1 On-site car parking must demonstrate:
(a) not provided; or (a) that it is necessary for the operation of
(b) not increased above existing the use; and
parking numbers. (b) parking must not exceed the minimum
provision required by Table E6.1.
The need for car parking on the site is self-evident, particularly as the facility caters for junior
sports in the main. As such, participants rely on parent transport to access Churchill Park.
The parking demand is based on survey of actual vehicle numbers, with allowance for future
growth based on the expanded number of sports fields.
5.6.3 E9.2 Water Quality Code
The purpose of the Water Quality Code is to ‘manage adverse impacts on wetlands and
watercourses. Being mindful of Churchill Park sharing a boundary with the North Esk Flood
Levee and associated wetland/watercourse, assessment against the code was initially
considered appropriate. However, with a greater than 50 m setback to the nearest water body,
together with the fact that stormwater from the car park is to be directed to Council’s reticulated
network, it has been determined that the code does not apply.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
5.6.4 E18.0 Signs Code
Signs that are defined as ‘community information signs’ (see definition below) defined in
accordance with E18.4 of the Signs Code, do not require a permit. The dimensions of a new
sign planned at the entrance to Churchill Park will likely be 3.5 m x 1.7 m. in accordance with
the LCC Corporate Signage Design Guidelines.
community means a sign erected by a statutory authority for the purpose of
information sign providing community information.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
6. Conclusion
The proposed application for the development of additional sporting fields and new car park at
Churchill Park has been assessed against all relevant provisions of the Launceston Interim
Planning Scheme 2015. The proposed works seek to revitalise and enhance Churchill Park for
all users, particularly with respect to the formalised car park and the expansion in the number of
playing fields. As demonstrated in this report, the proposal complies with all relevant provisions
of the Scheme and its approval can therefore be supported.

Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Appendices
Appendices
GHD | Report for Launceston City Council - City of Launceston - Churchill Park Additonal Sports Field, 3218251
3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Appendix A – Development Application Plans

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Appendix B – Surface Water and Sediment

Investigation by Pitt & Sherry 2014

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Surface Water and Sediment Investigation

Heritage Forest
Launceston
transport | community | industrial & mining | carbon & energy
Prepared for: Launceston City Council
Client representative: Rachael Eberhardt
Date: 20 November 2014

Rev 00

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Table of Contents
1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1
2. Scope of Works ..................................................................................................................................... 1
3. Site Details............................................................................................................................................. 1
4. Sampling Details .................................................................................................................................... 2
4.1 Locations .................................................................................................................................... 2
4.2 Methodology.............................................................................................................................. 3
4.3 Analytical criteria ....................................................................................................................... 3
4.4 Sediment .................................................................................................................................... 4
4.5 Field Observations ..................................................................................................................... 4
5. Assessment Criteria............................................................................................................................... 4
5.1 Sediments .................................................................................................................................. 4
5.2 Water ......................................................................................................................................... 4
6. Results and Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 5
6.1 Field Water Chemistry ............................................................................................................... 5
6.2 Surface Water ............................................................................................................................ 6
6.3 Sediment .................................................................................................................................... 8
7. Conclusions and Recommendations ..................................................................................................... 9
List of figures
Figure 1: Local Location of Heritage Forest
Figure 2: Surface Water Results Summary
List of tables
Table 1: Sampling Locations
Table 2: Field Water Chemistry Summary
Appendix A Analytical Reports
pitt&sherry ref: LN14333L001 Rep 31P Rev00.docx/DT/dr

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Prepared by: …………………………………………………. Date: 20 November 2014

Douglas Tangney
Reviewed by: …………………………………………………. Date: 20 November 2014

Ian Woodward
Authorised by: …………………………………………………. Date: 20 November 2014

Nick Bailey
Report Revision History
Rev
Description Prepared by Reviewed by Authorised by Date
No.
A Internal document DT Not applicable Not applicable
B client review DT IW Not applicable
00 Final Document DT IW NB 20/11/2014
© 2014 pitt&sherry
This document is and shall remain the property of pitt&sherry. The document may only be used for the purposes for
which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use
of this document in any form is prohibited.

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
1. Introduction
LCC own and manage the Heritage Forest Recreation Ground (HF) in Launceston. HF is a multipurpose
facility used by the surrounding community for passive and active recreation. HF was a municipal landfill
until the mid 1980’s before the current landfill at Remount Road was established.
LCC have been notified of discoloured water discharging from stormwater drains during recent heavy
rainfalls and was concerned that the discharge may be leachate. LCC engaged pitt&sherry to obtain water
and sediment samples from the discharge locations to assist in identifying if the discharge was leachate
and to determine the potential risks to human health or the local environment.
Samples from the drains were obtained on 25 September 2014, following a rain event and the results
were assessed against leachate data from Tasmanian Landfills and New South Wales Environment
Protection Agency references.
2. Scope of Works
The pitt&sherry scope of works was:
 Assist LCC to identify suitable sampling locations
 Obtain representative water and sediment samples at the agreed sampling locations
 Prepare a short report summarising the sampling and analytical results.
3. Site Details
Heritage Forest is located in Invermay, broadly bounded by the North Esk River, Invermay Road and
Vermont Road. A local location map is provided in Figure 1. HF is 28 ha, part of a former disposal area of
52 ha.
HF contains a number of sporting facilities, including the Churchill Park Hockey Centre, the LCC
herbarium, walking trails, playgrounds and interpretation boards. The hockey centre is used by a number
of clubs and schools in northern Tasmania.
The HF landfill commenced in 1964 and closed to the general public on 24 February 19851, with the
Remount Road Landfill opened on February 25 1985.
Records identifying the boundary of the filling area(s) or cell locations could not be located, which is not
surprising for a facility of this age. Analysis of aerials photos of 1955 and 1986 (both black and white)
could not accurately illustrate the landfill locations above the broad boundary provided by the local road
network.
The types of waste potentially in the landfill are unknown but are expected to be largely domestic as few
industries would have been operating during the period the landfill was open and any industry would
have likely disposed of their waste on their own land, rather than disposal at the landfill.
1
Public Notice in The Examiner 16 February 1985
pitt&sherry ref: LN14333L001 Rep 31P Rev00.docx/DT/dr 1

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Heritage Forest
Figure 1: Local Location of Heritage Forest
4. Sampling Details
4.1 Locations
The sampling locations developed and agreed with LCC are provided in Table 1.
Table 1: Sampling Locations
Location ID Easting (GDA 94) Northing (GDA 94) Description
HF01 (off 512517 5415242 Along eastern boundary off Churchill Park Drive
Churchill Park where a discoloured discharge was observed in
Drive) the drainage line following a rain event
HF02 (end of 511621 5415153 Drainage line east of Oswald Street

Henty Street)
HF03 (end of 511532 5415135 Up gradient of perceived disposal area. The

Lamont Street) drainage line receives surface water runoff from
adjacent houses. Data from this location used to
compare with down gradient locations HF 01 and
HF02

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
HF04 (north of 511734 5415235 Drainage line north east of Herbarium and
LCC depot) perceived to be up gradient of former landfill
4.2 Methodology
4.2.1 Surface Water Sample

At each location a sample of the surface water was obtained in laboratory supplied sample bottles. The
sample was obtained from the flowing part of the drainage lines at HF02/03 and 04 and from the shallow
ponded water at HF01 (as there was no active flow in the HF01 drainage line).
The bottles were placed just below the level of the water surface, allowing water to collect in the bottle
and the lid was then tightly placed on the bottle. The bottles were placed into the cooled esky for later
transport to the laboratory.
Field water chemistry was obtained using the pitt&sherry TPS FL90 water quality meter. Results were
recorded when each parameter had stabilised and are provided in Section 6.
4.2.2 Sediment
A sediment sample was also obtained from each location using a spade. Each sample was obtained from
the 0-100 mm horizon and committed into the laboratory supplied jars with zero headspace to preserve
volatiles analysis. Any large debris, stones or vegetation was removed from the sample.
The spade was cleaned between samples using deionised water and decon 90 solution to prevent cross
contamination between samples.
4.3 Analytical criteria

The surface water samples were analysed for the following parameters:
 Total Alkalinity
 Chloride
 Sodium
 Total Metals
 Chemical Oxygen Demand
 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (with Silica Gel Clean up)
 Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene Xylene
These parameters were deemed appropriate to identify leachate (if any) in the site drainage lines. The
Silica Gel Clean up method was used to remove any biogenic hydrocarbons in the samples and allow only
petrogenic hydrocarbons to be identified in the sediment, thereby reflecting any industrial waste in the
leachate and allowing a more accurate assessment of environmental and human health risks to be made.

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
4.4 Sediment
Sediment samples were analysed for the following parameters:
 Total Alkalinity
 Chloride
 Sodium
 Total Metals
 Total Organic Carbon
 Chemical Oxygen Demand
 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (with Silica Gel Clean up)
 Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene Xylene
The reasons for the analytical suite are the same as the surface water samples, with Total Organic Carbon
added to understand soil health and potential impacts on the local vegetation.
4.5 Field Observations

The following observations were made during the field sampling:
 The water at HF01 (eastern boundary of Churchill Park Drive) was a ‘muddy’ colour
 No sheens or scums were noted on the surface water at HF01/02/03/04
 The sediment samples had an ‘organic’ smell possibly reflecting decomposing vegetation in the
drainage lines
 The flows at HF02 and HF03 were noticeably higher than at HF01 and HF04, likely to be caused by
inputs from the adjacent residential community
5. Assessment Criteria
5.1 Sediments
The sediment results were assessed against the following references:
 NSW EPA How to Interpret your Soil Results
 ANZECC 2000 Sediment Quality Guidelines (low and high ranges)
 Variations between samples, above (HF03/04) and below (HF01/02) the perceived filling area
5.2 Water
 Leachate results from a Tasmanian Level 2 Facility
 ANZECC 2000 95% Protection Limit for Freshwater (the 95% protection limit is conservative given the
water quality in the Tamar River from historical inputs)

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
6. Results and Discussion

6.1 Field Water Chemistry
The field water chemistry results were obtained using a TPS FL 90 water quality meter and are provided in
Table 2.
Table 2: Field Water Chemistry
Temperature
Conductivity
Redox (mV)
Oxygen (%)
Sample ID
pH (units)
Dissolved
Turbidity
(uS/cm)
(ntu)
(°C)
HF01 33 2316 7.321 16.3 410 91
HF02 46.9 306 7.72 16.9 1120 90
HF03 32.5 2399 7.45 17.3 362 28
HF04 26.3 2222 7.91 16.4 86 82
ANZECC 2000 Guidelines
85-110 125-2400 6.5-8.0 6-50
Values – Low Land Rivers
The field water chemistry results do not indicate that possible leachate is impacting upon water quality.
Dissolved oxygen results are below guidelines levels but this is most likely to due to the low gradient and
low flows in the drainage lines and lack of substrate.
Conductivity results would be generally classed as ‘Freshwater’ as the results are below 2400 uS/cm, as
would be expected in a river environment.
The Turbidity result at HF02 is slightly elevated above the remaining results but was caused by disturbing
the channel during sample collection. This was unavoidable due to the low flows.

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
6.2 Surface Water
Figure 2: Surface Water Results Summary
The surface water results do not indicate any gross contamination. The highlighted metals are marginally
elevated above the ANZECC 2000 guidelines; however, the 95% protection level reflects a near pristine
waterway supporting aquatic species and life. Neither the drainage lines nor the North Esk River
(receiving water body) are pristine waterways. Water chemistry in the North Esk River is likely to be
reduced by current and historical inputs and unlikely to be adversely impacted by discharges from the
sampling locations based on the analytical results.

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
The TPH (Silica Gel Cleanup) identified in HF03 and HF04 (highlighted) is considered to be more likely due
to road runoff near these sampling locations2 than an indication of possible contamination from the
former landfill.
All surface water results are below the water chemistry data obtained from the leachate pond of a
southern Tasmanian landfill and indicate that the discharge at the sampling locations is unlikely to be
leachate on this occasion. Ongoing monitoring and surveillance of the water quality will clarify whether
this once-off sampling event conclusion is applicable generally.
2
Piped stormwater drains from the local road network into the drainage line upstream of the sampling locations

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
6.3 Sediment
Figure 3: Sediment Results Summary

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
The soil results do not indicate gross contamination. Sodium and some metals are elevated above
guideline levels; however, the NSW EPA guidelines reflect soil concentrations for agricultural
environments and are more conservative than the site requires. With the exception of Nickel in HF01 and
HF04, all results are below the trigger levels in the ANZECC 2000 guidelines and no further detailed
assessment would be required at this stage in these locations.
All hydrocarbons are below the analytical level of reporting (LOR) indicating that the Total Organic Carbon
(TOC) and Chemical Oxygen Demand are likely to reflect natural biological concentrations rather than
possible leachate or waste materials or gross contamination.
The elevated TOC in the sediments at HF01 and HF04 are consistent with the observations during
sampling where there was a lot of decomposing vegetation at and around the sampling location.
7. Conclusions and Recommendations

LCC were notified of possible leachate leaking from the former landfill at HF and engaged pitt&sherry to
investigate water and sediment chemistry at 4 locations to determine whether leachate is present in the
drainage lines around the site.
The results do not indicate that leachate is present in the drainage lines on this occasion but repeat
sampling would be necessary to determine whether this is a general conclusion.
It is recommended that LCC regularly check the drainage lines around the site to observe any changes in
colour or odour in the surface waters or any areas of dying vegetation around the waterways, which may
indicate leachate is leaking. It is also recommended that LCC investigate any areas of ponded water,
particularly in areas where ponding does not usually occur, to check if any localised leachate is
accumulating.
If any works occur on the site and any rubbish is intercepted, works should be stopped and the
coordinates of the area recorded to allow any future remediation or monitoring to target historical filling
areas. Any soil containing rubbish should be sampled and analysed as per Environment Protection
Authority guidelines prior to offsite disposal to ensure that any environmental risks can be adequately
controlled and managed.

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Appendix A
Analytical Reports

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
False
9.00
9
False Environmental
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Work Order Page
: EM1410061 : 1 of 7
Client : PITT & SHERRY Laboratory : Environmental Division Melbourne

Contact : MR DOUGLAS TANGNEY Contact : Shirley LeCornu
Address : PO BOX 94 Address : 4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171
199 MACQUARIE ST
HOBART TAS, AUSTRALIA 7001
E-mail : dtangney@pittsh.com.au E-mail : shirley.lecornu@alsenviro.com
Telephone : +61 03 6323 1973 Telephone : +61-3-8549 9630
Facsimile : +61 03 6334 4651 Facsimile : +61-3-8549 9601
Project : HERITAGE FOREST QC Level : NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
Order number : LNL 3528
C-O-C number : ---- Date Samples Received : 26-SEP-2014
Sampler : DT Issue Date : 08-OCT-2014
Site : ----
No. of samples received :8
Quote number : MEBQ/119/14 No. of samples analysed :8
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for
release.
This Certificate of Analysis contains the following information:
l General Comments
l Analytical Results
l Surrogate Control Limits
Address 4 Westall Rd Springvale VIC Australia 3171 | PHONE +61-3-8549 9600 | Facsimile +61-3-8549 9601
Environmental Division Melbourne ABN 84 009 936 029 Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 2 of 7
Work Order : EM1410061

Client : PITT & SHERRY

Project : HERITAGE FOREST
General Comments
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis.
Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
When sampling time information is not provided by the client, sampling dates are shown without a time component. In these instances, the time component has been assumed by the laboratory for processing purposes.
Where a result is required to meet compliance limits the associated uncertainty must be considered. Refer to the ALS Contact for details.
Key : CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.
LOR = Limit of reporting
^ = This result is computed from individual analyte detections at or above the level of reporting
l ED045G: The presence of thiocyanate can positively contribute to the chloride result, thereby may bias results higher than expected. Results should be scrutinised accordingly.
l EP026 soil COD: It is recognised that very high soil COD results are reported, especially for samples HF01 and HF04. The results may bias high due to the very high moisture content
obtained. Results should be scrutinisied accordingly.
l EP080: LOR for particular samples raised due to high moisture content.
l TOC (EP003) and COD (EP026) conducted by ALS Brisbane, NATA accreditation no. 825, site no. 818.
NATA Accredited Laboratory 825 Signatories

This document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories indicated below. Electronic signing has been carried out in
Accredited for compliance with compliance with procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.
ISO/IEC 17025. Signatories Position Accreditation Category
Christopher Lemaitre Non-Metals Team Leader Melbourne Inorganics

Dilani Fernando Senior Inorganic Chemist Melbourne Inorganics
Martina Louw Inorganic Chemist Brisbane Inorganics
Satishkumar Trivedi 2 IC Acid Sulfate Soils Supervisor Brisbane Acid Sulphate Soils
Xing Lin Senior Organic Chemist Melbourne Organics
3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 3 of 7


Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) Client sample ID HF01 HF02 HF03 HF04 ----
Client sampling date / time 25-SEP-2014 12:30 25-SEP-2014 13:00 25-SEP-2014 13:55 25-SEP-2014 14:35 ----
Compound CAS Number LOR Unit EM1410061-005 EM1410061-006 EM1410061-007 EM1410061-008 ----
EA055: Moisture Content

Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1.0 % 80.0 36.6 34.6 65.2 ----
ED037: Alkalinity
Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 ---- 1 mg/kg 842 428 97 357 ----
Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 71-52-3 1 mg/kg 842 428 97 357 ----
Carbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 3812-32-6 1 mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 ----
ED045G: Chloride Discrete analyser

Chloride 16887-00-6 10 mg/kg 1560 190 290 370 ----
ED093S: Soluble Major Cations

Sodium 7440-23-5 10 mg/kg 1320 320 280 660 ----
EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES

Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg 6 <5 <5 <5 ----
Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg <1 <1 <1 <1 ----
Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg 169 33 11 40 ----
Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg 95 40 13 50 ----
Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg 54 47 16 16 ----
Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg 98 40 12 73 ----
Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg 293 188 68 188 ----
EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS

Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 ----
EP003: Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in Soil

Total Organic Carbon ---- 0.02 % 11.9 3.89 2.37 8.86 ----
EP026: Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)

Chemical Oxygen Demand ---- 100 mg/kg 1820000 132000 93700 661000 ----
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup
>C10 - C16 Fraction >C10_C16 50 mg/kg <110 <50 <50 <50 ----
>C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <110 <100 <100 <100 ----
>C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <110 <100 <100 <100 ----
^ >C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 ----
^ >C10 - C16 Fraction minus Naphthalene ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 ----
(F2)
EP071 SG-S: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil - Silica gel cleanup

C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <110 <50 <50 <50 ----
C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <220 <100 <100 <100 ----

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 4 of 7


Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: SOIL (Matrix: SOIL) Client sample ID HF01 HF02 HF03 HF04 ----
EP071 SG-S: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil - Silica gel cleanup - Continued
C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <220 <100 <100 <100 ----
^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 <50 <50 ----
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons

C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <40 <10 <10 <20 ----
C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <110 <50 <50 <50 ----
C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg 340 <100 <100 <100 ----
C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <220 <100 <100 <100 ----
^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg 340 <50 <50 <50 ----
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions

C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 10 mg/kg <40 <10 <10 <20 ----
^ C6 - C10 Fraction minus BTEX C6_C10-BTEX 10 mg/kg <40 <10 <10 <20 ----
(F1)
>C10 - C16 Fraction >C10_C16 50 mg/kg 220 <50 <50 <50 ----
>C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg 160 <100 <100 <100 ----
>C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <110 <100 <100 <100 ----
^ >C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg 380 <50 <50 <50 ----
^ >C10 - C16 Fraction minus Naphthalene ---- 50 mg/kg 220 <50 <50 <50 ----
(F2)
EP080: BTEXN
Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.8 <0.2 <0.2 <0.4 ----
Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <2.0 <0.5 <0.5 <1.0 ----
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <2.0 <0.5 <0.5 <1.0 ----
meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 106-42-3 0.5 mg/kg <2.0 <0.5 <0.5 <1.0 ----
ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 0.5 mg/kg <2.0 <0.5 <0.5 <1.0 ----
^ Sum of BTEX ---- 0.2 mg/kg <0.8 <0.2 <0.2 <0.4 ----
^ Total Xylenes 1330-20-7 0.5 mg/kg <2.0 <0.5 <0.5 <1.0 ----
Naphthalene 91-20-3 1 mg/kg <4 <1 <1 <2 ----
EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates

1.2-Dichloroethane-D4 17060-07-0 0.1 % 59.4 82.4 69.1 67.1 ----
Toluene-D8 2037-26-5 0.1 % 65.6 89.3 78.9 73.6 ----
4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 0.1 % 63.0 100 83.0 72.4 ----

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 5 of 7


Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: WATER (Matrix: WATER) Client sample ID HF01 HF02 HF03 HF04 ----
ED037P: Alkalinity by PC Titrator

Hydroxide Alkalinity as CaCO3 DMO-210-001 1 mg/L <1 <1 <1 <1 ----
Carbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 3812-32-6 1 mg/L <1 <1 <1 <1 ----
Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 71-52-3 1 mg/L 609 839 120 630 ----
Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 ---- 1 mg/L 609 839 120 630 ----

Chloride 16887-00-6 1 mg/L 474 563 575 421 ----
ED093F: Dissolved Major Cations

Sodium 7440-23-5 1 mg/L 241 329 350 288 ----
EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS

Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.001 mg/L 0.002 0.010 0.002 0.007 ----
Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.0001 mg/L 0.0001 0.0009 0.0009 0.0008 ----
Chromium 7440-47-3 0.001 mg/L 0.004 0.058 0.012 0.015 ----
Copper 7440-50-8 0.001 mg/L 0.005 0.084 0.034 0.036 ----
Nickel 7440-02-0 0.001 mg/L 0.013 0.103 0.052 0.048 ----
Lead 7439-92-1 0.001 mg/L 0.002 0.096 0.014 0.010 ----
Zinc 7440-66-6 0.005 mg/L 0.028 0.399 0.887 0.086 ----

Mercury 7439-97-6 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001 ----
EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand (Spectrophotometric)

Chemical Oxygen Demand ---- 10 mg/L 216 209 496 329 ----
EP071 SG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Silica gel cleanup

C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L <50 <50 60 <50 ----
C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 <100 120 280 ----
C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L <50 <50 <50 240 ----
^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 µg/L <50 <50 180 520 ----
>C10 - C16 Fraction >C10_C16 100 µg/L <100 <100 110 <100 ----
>C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 <100 <100 460 ----
>C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 <100 <100 130 ----
^ >C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) ---- 100 µg/L <100 <100 110 590 ----
>C10 - C16 Fraction minus Naphthalene ---- 100 µg/L <100 <100 110 <100 ----
(F2)

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 6 of 7


Analytical Results
Sub-Matrix: WATER (Matrix: WATER) Client sample ID HF01 HF02 HF03 HF04 ----
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Continued

C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 20 µg/L <20 <20 <20 <20 ----
C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L <50 <50 60 100 ----
C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L 260 240 210 480 ----
C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L 60 <50 <50 460 ----
^ C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 µg/L 320 240 270 1040 ----

C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 20 µg/L <20 <20 <20 <20 ----
^ C6 - C10 Fraction minus BTEX C6_C10-BTEX 20 µg/L <20 <20 <20 <20 ----
(F1)
>C10 - C16 Fraction >C10_C16 100 µg/L <100 <100 110 130 ----
>C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L 310 260 210 830 ----
>C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 <100 <100 370 ----
^ >C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) ---- 100 µg/L 310 260 320 1330 ----
^ >C10 - C16 Fraction minus Naphthalene ---- 100 µg/L <100 <100 110 130 ----
(F2)
EP080: BTEXN
Benzene 71-43-2 1 µg/L <1 <1 <1 <1 ----
Toluene 108-88-3 2 µg/L <2 <2 <2 <2 ----
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 2 µg/L <2 <2 <2 <2 ----
meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 106-42-3 2 µg/L <2 <2 <2 <2 ----
ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 2 µg/L <2 <2 <2 <2 ----
^ Total Xylenes 1330-20-7 2 µg/L <2 <2 <2 <2 ----
^ Sum of BTEX ---- 1 µg/L <1 <1 <1 <1 ----
Naphthalene 91-20-3 5 µg/L <5 <5 <5 <5 ----

1.2-Dichloroethane-D4 17060-07-0 0.1 % 104 104 77.4 61.3 ----
Toluene-D8 2037-26-5 0.1 % 114 114 103 102 ----
4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 0.1 % 125 129 111 112 ----

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 7 of 7


Surrogate Control Limits

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Recovery Limits (%)
Compound CAS Number Low High

1.2-Dichloroethane-D4 17060-07-0 51 125
Toluene-D8 2037-26-5 55 125
4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 56 124
Sub-Matrix: WATER Recovery Limits (%)
Compound CAS Number Low High

1.2-Dichloroethane-D4 17060-07-0 73 129
Toluene-D8 2037-26-5 70 125
4-Bromofluorobenzene 460-00-4 71 129

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
9.0006/06/2018
False9
Date
advertised:
False
Environmental
QUALITY CONTROL REPORT
Work Order : EM1410061 Page : 1 of 13

199 MACQUARIE ST
Site : ----
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for
release.
This Quality Control Report contains the following information:
l Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report ; Relative Percentage Difference (RPD) and Acceptance Limits
l Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits
l Matrix Spike (MS) Report ; Recovery and Acceptance Limits

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 2 of 13

General Comments
The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the USEPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request.
Where moisture determination has been performed, results are reported on a dry weight basis.
Where a reported less than (<) result is higher than the LOR, this may be due to primary sample extract/digestate dilution and/or insufficient sample for analysis.
Where the LOR of a reported result differs from standard LOR, this may be due to high moisture content, insufficient sample (reduced weight employed) or matrix interference.
Key : Anonymous = Refers to samples which are not specifically part of this work order but formed part of the QC process lot
CAS Number = CAS registry number from database maintained by Chemical Abstracts Services. The Chemical Abstracts Service is a division of the American Chemical Society.
LOR = Limit of reporting
RPD = Relative Percentage Difference
# = Indicates failed QC
NATA Accredited Signatories

Laboratory 825 This document has been electronically signed by the authorized signatories indicated below. Electronic signing has been carried out in compliance with
procedures specified in 21 CFR Part 11.
Accredited for
Signatories Position Accreditation Category
compliance with
ISO/IEC 17025. Christopher Lemaitre Non-Metals Team Leader Melbourne Inorganics
Dilani Fernando Senior Inorganic Chemist Melbourne Inorganics
Martina Louw Inorganic Chemist Brisbane Inorganics
Satishkumar Trivedi 2 IC Acid Sulfate Soils Supervisor Brisbane Acid Sulphate Soils
3747740 Xing Lin Senior Organic Chemist Melbourne Organics
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 3 of 13

Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

The quality control term Laboratory Duplicate refers to a randomly selected intralaboratory split. Laboratory duplicates provide information regarding method precision and sample heterogeneity. The permitted ranges
for the Relative Percent Deviation (RPD) of Laboratory Duplicates are specified in ALS Method QWI -EN/38 and are dependent on the magnitude of results in comparison to the level of reporting: Result < 10 times LOR:
No Limit; Result between 10 and 20 times LOR: 0% - 50%; Result > 20 times LOR: 0% - 20%.
Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report
Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Original Result Duplicate Result RPD (%) Recovery Limits (%)
EA055: Moisture Content (QC Lot: 3655273)
EM1410066-001 Anonymous EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1.0 % 34.5 38.4 10.7 0% - 20%
EM1410066-013 Anonymous EA055-103: Moisture Content (dried @ 103°C) ---- 1.0 % 29.8 29.8 0.0 0% - 20%
ED037: Alkalinity (QC Lot: 3659666)
EM1410061-005 HF01 ED037: Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 ---- 1 meq/kg 842 806 4.3 0% - 20%
ED045G: Chloride by Discrete Analyser (QC Lot: 3659667)
EM1410061-005 HF01 ED045G: Chloride 16887-00-6 10 mg/kg 1560 1580 0.8 0% - 20%
ED093S: Soluble Major Cations (QC Lot: 3659665)
EM1410061-005 HF01 ED093S: Sodium 7440-23-5 10 mg/kg 1320 1320 0.0 0% - 20%
EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QC Lot: 3658416)
EM1410067-002 Anonymous EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.0 No Limit
EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg 19 19 0.0 No Limit
EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg 13 12 0.0 No Limit
EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg 9 7 24.4 No Limit
EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg 6 6 0.0 No Limit
EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg 11 12 0.0 No Limit
EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg 11 12 0.0 No Limit
EM1410105-002 Anonymous EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.0 No Limit
EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg 20 15 24.5 No Limit
EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg 12 9 25.0 No Limit
EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg <5 <5 0.0 No Limit
EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg 22 18 20.7 No Limit
EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg 49 36 30.0 No Limit
EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg 152 141 7.2 0% - 20%
EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QC Lot: 3658417)
EM1410067-002 Anonymous EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 <0.1 0.0 No Limit
EM1410105-002 Anonymous EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg 0.2 0.2 0.0 No Limit
EP003: Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in Soil (QC Lot: 3656935)
EM1409987-006 Anonymous EP003: Total Organic Carbon ---- 0.02 % 0.08 0.08 0.0 No Limit
EM1410091-006 Anonymous EP003: Total Organic Carbon ---- 0.02 % 2.61 2.62 0.0 0% - 20%
EP026: Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) (QC Lot: 3658901)
EM1410061-005 HF01 EP026: Chemical Oxygen Demand ---- 100 mg/kg 1820000 1840000 1.0 0% - 20%
EP071 SG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Silica gel cleanup (QC Lot: 3656850)
EM1410061-005 HF01 EP071SG-S: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <220 <220 0.0 No Limit
EP071SG-S: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <220 <220 0.0 No Limit

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 4 of 13

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

EP071 SG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Silica gel cleanup (QC Lot: 3656850) - continued
EM1410061-005 HF01 EP071SG-S: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <110 <110 0.0 No Limit
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup (QC Lot: 3656850)
EM1410061-005 HF01 EP071SG-S: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <110 <110 0.0 No Limit
EP071SG-S: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <110 <110 0.0 No Limit
EP071SG-S: >C10 - C16 Fraction >C10_C16 50 mg/kg <110 <110 0.0 No Limit
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 3655107)
EM1410091-001 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 <10 0.0 No Limit
EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.0 No Limit
EP071: C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.0 No Limit
EP071: C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.0 No Limit
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions (QC Lot: 3655107)
EM1410091-001 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 10 mg/kg <10 <10 0.0 No Limit
EM1409966-002 Anonymous EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.0 No Limit
EP071: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.0 No Limit
EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction >C10_C16 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.0 No Limit
EP071: >C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.0 No Limit
EM1409966-051 Anonymous EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.0 No Limit
EP071: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 <100 0.0 No Limit
EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction >C10_C16 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.0 No Limit
EP071: >C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg <50 <50 0.0 No Limit
EP080: BTEXN (QC Lot: 3655107)
EM1410091-001 Anonymous EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 <0.2 0.0 No Limit
EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit
EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit
EP080: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit
106-42-3
EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 <0.5 0.0 No Limit
EP080: Naphthalene 91-20-3 1 mg/kg <1 <1 0.0 No Limit
Sub-Matrix: WATER Laboratory Duplicate (DUP) Report

ED037P: Alkalinity by PC Titrator (QC Lot: 3655790)
EM1409974-001 Anonymous ED037-P: Hydroxide Alkalinity as CaCO3 DMO-210-001 1 mg/L <1 <1 0.0 No Limit
3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 5 of 13


ED037P: Alkalinity by PC Titrator (QC Lot: 3655790) - continued
EM1409974-001 Anonymous ED037-P: Carbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 3812-32-6 1 mg/L <1 <1 0.0 No Limit
ED037-P: Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 71-52-3 1 mg/L 552 540 2.2 0% - 20%
ED037-P: Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 ---- 1 mg/L 552 540 2.2 0% - 20%
EM1409981-002 Anonymous ED037-P: Hydroxide Alkalinity as CaCO3 DMO-210-001 1 mg/L <1 <1 0.0 No Limit
ED037-P: Carbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 3812-32-6 1 mg/L <1 <1 0.0 No Limit
ED037-P: Bicarbonate Alkalinity as CaCO3 71-52-3 1 mg/L 1280 1250 2.1 0% - 20%
ED037-P: Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 ---- 1 mg/L 1280 1250 2.1 0% - 20%
ED045G: Chloride Discrete analyser (QC Lot: 3655229)
EM1409974-001 Anonymous ED045G: Chloride 16887-00-6 1 mg/L 332 335 0.8 0% - 20%
EM1409988-001 Anonymous ED045G: Chloride 16887-00-6 1 mg/L 1640 1630 0.6 0% - 20%
ED093F: Dissolved Major Cations (QC Lot: 3655227)
EM1409974-001 Anonymous ED093F: Sodium 7440-23-5 1 mg/L 208 205 1.5 0% - 20%
EM1409988-001 Anonymous ED093F: Sodium 7440-23-5 1 mg/L 1300 1300 0.7 0% - 20%
EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QC Lot: 3658485)
EM1409974-007 Anonymous EG020A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.0001 mg/L 0.0001 0.0001 0.0 No Limit
EG020A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.001 mg/L 0.007 0.007 0.0 No Limit
EG020A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.001 mg/L 0.111 0.117 5.0 0% - 20%
EG020A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 0.001 mg/L 0.010 0.011 0.0 0% - 50%
EG020A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.0 No Limit
EG020A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.001 mg/L 0.011 0.010 0.0 0% - 50%
EG020A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 0.005 mg/L 0.021 0.020 6.5 No Limit
EM1410066-029 Anonymous EG020A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0 No Limit
EG020A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.0 No Limit
EG020A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.0 No Limit
EG020A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.0 No Limit
EG020A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.0 No Limit
EG020A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.001 mg/L <0.001 <0.001 0.0 No Limit
EG020A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 0.005 mg/L <0.005 <0.005 0.0 No Limit
EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QC Lot: 3656639)
EM1410061-001 HF01 EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 <0.0001 0.0 No Limit
EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand (Spectrophotometric) (QC Lot: 3656924)
EM1410023-001 Anonymous EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand ---- 10 mg/L 160 130 20.7 0% - 50%
EM1410023-012 Anonymous EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand ---- 10 mg/L 1720 1780 3.4 0% - 20%
EM1410060-001 Anonymous EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 <100 0.0 No Limit
EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L <50 <50 0.0 No Limit
3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 6 of 13


EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QC Lot: 3655534) - continued
EM1410060-001 Anonymous EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction >C10_C16 100 µg/L <100 <100 0.0 No Limit
EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 <100 0.0 No Limit
EM1410060-003 Anonymous EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction >C10_C16 100 µg/L <100 <100 0.0 No Limit
EM1409974-001 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 20 µg/L <20 <20 0.0 No Limit
EM1410109-026 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 20 µg/L <20 <20 0.0 No Limit
EP080: BTEXN (QC Lot: 3658668)
EM1409974-001 Anonymous EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 1 µg/L <1 <1 0.0 No Limit
EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 2 µg/L <2 <2 0.0 No Limit
EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 2 µg/L <2 <2 0.0 No Limit
EP080: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 2 µg/L <2 <2 0.0 No Limit
106-42-3
EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 2 µg/L <2 <2 0.0 No Limit
EP080: Naphthalene 91-20-3 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.0 No Limit
EM1410109-026 Anonymous EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 1 µg/L <1 <1 0.0 No Limit
EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 2 µg/L <2 <2 0.0 No Limit
EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 2 µg/L <2 <2 0.0 No Limit
EP080: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 2 µg/L <2 <2 0.0 No Limit
106-42-3
EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 2 µg/L <2 <2 0.0 No Limit
EP080: Naphthalene 91-20-3 5 µg/L <5 <5 0.0 No Limit

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 7 of 13

Method Blank (MB) and Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report

The quality control term Method / Laboratory Blank refers to an analyte free matrix to which all reagents are added in the same volumes or proportions as used in standard sample preparation. The purpose of this QC
parameter is to monitor potential laboratory contamination. The quality control term Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) refers to a certified reference material, or a known interference free matrix spiked with target
analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor method precision and accuracy independent of sample matrix. Dynamic Recovery Limits are based on statistical evaluation of processed LCS.
Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
Report Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%)
Method: Compound CAS Number LOR Unit Result Concentration LCS Low High
ED037: Alkalinity (QCLot: 3659666)

ED037: Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 ---- 1 meq/kg ---- 200 meq/kg 94.4 89 119
ED045G: Chloride by Discrete Analyser (QCLot: 3659667)

ED045G: Chloride 16887-00-6 10 mg/kg ---- 5000 mg/kg 105 94 110
<10 50 mg/kg 100 89 111
ED093S: Soluble Major Cations (QCLot: 3659665)

ED093S: Sodium 7440-23-5 10 mg/kg <10 500 mg/kg 98.7 94 106
EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES (QCLot: 3658416)

EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 5 mg/kg <5 21.7 mg/kg 96.0 79 113
EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 1 mg/kg <1 4.64 mg/kg 99.0 87 115
EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 2 mg/kg <2 43.9 mg/kg 101 89 113
EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 5 mg/kg <5 32.0 mg/kg 97.9 90 116
EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 5 mg/kg <5 40.0 mg/kg 95.1 85 107
EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 2 mg/kg <2 55.0 mg/kg 102 89 111
EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 5 mg/kg <5 60.8 mg/kg 99.7 89 111
EG035T: Total Recoverable Mercury by FIMS (QCLot: 3658417)

EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.1 mg/kg <0.1 2.57 mg/kg 87.3 70 130
EP003: Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in Soil (QCLot: 3656935)

EP003: Total Organic Carbon ---- 0.02 % <0.02 1.98 % 100 70 130
EP026: Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) (QCLot: 3658901)

EP026: Chemical Oxygen Demand ---- 100 mg/kg <100 500 mg/kg 82.2 76 117
EP071 SG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Silica gel cleanup (QCLot: 3656850)
EP071SG-S: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 596 mg/kg 70.5 70 130
EP071 SG: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions - Silica gel cleanup (QCLot: 3656850)
EP071SG-S: >C10 - C16 Fraction >C10_C16 50 mg/kg <50 883 mg/kg 72.4 70 130
EP071SG-S: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 3759 mg/kg 74.9 70 130
EP071SG-S: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 119 mg/kg 70.6 70 130
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 3655107)

EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 10 mg/kg <10 36 mg/kg 109 68 129

EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 mg/kg <50 817 mg/kg 91.8 72 130
3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 8 of 13

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Method Blank (MB) Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
EP080/071: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (QCLot: 3656740) - continued

EP071: C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 mg/kg <50 ---- ---- ---- ----
EP080/071: Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - NEPM 2013 Fractions (QCLot: 3655107)

EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 10 mg/kg <10 45 mg/kg 104 66 132

EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction >C10_C16 50 mg/kg <50 1157 mg/kg 92.2 75 123
EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 4732 mg/kg 92.5 77 127
EP071: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 mg/kg <100 233 mg/kg 63.2 43 123
EP071: >C10 - C40 Fraction (sum) ---- 100 mg/kg <100 ---- ---- ---- ----
EP080: BTEXN (QCLot: 3655107)

EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 0.2 mg/kg <0.2 2 mg/kg 123 74 124
EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 2 mg/kg 117 74 130
EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 2 mg/kg 116 71 127
EP080: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 4 mg/kg 121 71 133
106-42-3
EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 0.5 mg/kg <0.5 2 mg/kg 124 74 130
EP080: Naphthalene 91-20-3 1 mg/kg <1 0.5 mg/kg 130 68 132
Sub-Matrix: WATER Method Blank (MB) Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
ED037P: Alkalinity by PC Titrator (QCLot: 3655790)

ED037-P: Total Alkalinity as CaCO3 ---- 1 mg/L ---- 200 mg/L 96.7 90 110
ED045G: Chloride Discrete analyser (QCLot: 3655229)

ED045G: Chloride 16887-00-6 1 mg/L ---- 1000 mg/L 105 92 112
<1 10 mg/L 98.8 89 117
ED093F: Dissolved Major Cations (QCLot: 3655227)

ED093F: Sodium 7440-23-5 1 mg/L <1 50 mg/L 98.6 88 112
EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS (QCLot: 3658485)

EG020A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.001 mg/L <0.001 0.1 mg/L 102 97 113
EG020A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 0.1 mg/L 101 90 110
EG020A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 0.001 mg/L <0.001 0.1 mg/L 103 89 113
EG020A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 0.001 mg/L <0.001 0.1 mg/L 101 90 112
EG020A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 0.001 mg/L <0.001 0.1 mg/L 108 91 113
EG020A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 0.001 mg/L <0.001 0.1 mg/L 105 90 114
EG020A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 0.005 mg/L <0.005 0.1 mg/L 105 89 109

EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.0001 mg/L <0.0001 0.0100 mg/L 91.6 87 113

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 9 of 13

Sub-Matrix: WATER Method Blank (MB) Laboratory Control Spike (LCS) Report
EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand (Spectrophotometric) (QCLot: 3656924)

EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand ---- 10 mg/L <10 25 mg/L 100 89 113
EP071SG: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L <50 75508 µg/L 92.9 68 144
EP071SG: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 124063 µg/L 91.7 67 133
EP071SG: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L <50 ---- ---- ---- ----
EP071SG: C10 - C36 Fraction (sum) ---- 50 µg/L <50 ---- ---- ---- ----
EP071SG: >C10 - C16 Fraction >C10_C16 100 µg/L <100 ---- ---- ---- ----
EP071SG: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 ---- ---- ---- ----
EP071SG: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 ---- ---- ---- ----

EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 50 µg/L <50 3980 µg/L 67.2 46 126


EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction >C10_C16 100 µg/L <100 5753 µg/L 67.5 53 129
EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 24516 µg/L 74.4 56 132
EP071: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 100 µg/L <100 828 µg/L 77.0 51 137

EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 20 µg/L <20 450 µg/L 90.6 65 125

EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 1 µg/L <1 20 µg/L 99.6 76 120
EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 2 µg/L <2 20 µg/L 101 76 124
EP080: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 2 µg/L <2 20 µg/L 91.6 72 124
EP080: meta- & para-Xylene 108-38-3 2 µg/L <2 40 µg/L 93.1 72 130
106-42-3
EP080: ortho-Xylene 95-47-6 2 µg/L <2 20 µg/L 98.8 75 127
EP080: Naphthalene 91-20-3 5 µg/L <5 5 µg/L 94.8 71 129
Matrix Spike (MS) Report

The quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) refers to an intralaboratory split sample spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of this QC parameter is to monitor potential matrix effects on
analyte recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.
Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report
Spike SpikeRecovery(%) Recovery Limits (%)
Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number Concentration MS Low High
3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 10 of 13

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) Report


EM1410061-006 HF02 ED045G: Chloride 16887-00-6 2000 mg/kg 114 93 125

EM1410067-004 Anonymous EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 50 mg/kg 91.9 80 116
EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 50 mg/kg 87.6 85 115
EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 50 mg/kg 92.8 79 119
EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 50 mg/kg 92.6 83 119
EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 50 mg/kg 85.1 79 117
EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 50 mg/kg 83.5 79 117
EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 50 mg/kg 81.1 75 121
EM1410067-004 Anonymous EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 5.0 mg/kg 80.1 76 116

EM1410061-006 HF02 EP026: Chemical Oxygen Demand ---- 40000 mg/kg 97.2 70 130
EM1410061-006 HF02 EP071SG-S: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 596 mg/kg 84.7 70 130
EP071SG-S: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 2720 mg/kg 78.1 70 130
EP071SG-S: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 1373 mg/kg 91.6 70 130
EM1410061-006 HF02 EP071SG-S: >C10 - C16 Fraction >C10_C16 883 mg/kg 84.5 70 130
EP071SG-S: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 3759 mg/kg 99.8 70 130
EP071SG-S: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 119 mg/kg 99.0 70 130

EM1410091-003 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 28 mg/kg 88.5 42 131

EM1410061-006 HF02 EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 817 mg/kg 92.0 71 131
EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 3286 mg/kg 92.0 72 126
EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 1633 mg/kg 92.5 74 122

EM1410091-003 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 33 mg/kg 86.7 39 129

EM1410061-006 HF02 EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction >C10_C16 1157 mg/kg 91.9 73 123
EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 4732 mg/kg 93.0 75 129
EP071: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 233 mg/kg 89.2 54 124
EM1410091-003 Anonymous EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 2 mg/kg 126 50 136
EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 2 mg/kg 134 56 139
3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 11 of 13

Sub-Matrix: WATER Matrix Spike (MS) Report


EM1409974-002 Anonymous ED045G: Chloride 16887-00-6 400 mg/L 106 70 130

EM1409974-007 Anonymous EG020A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/L 102 84 116
EG020A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.25 mg/L 83.8 73 131
EG020A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/L 89.7 79 119
EG020A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/L 93.7 78 116
EG020A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/L 98.6 81 121
EG020A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/L 101 78 116
EG020A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/L 93.1 72 118
EM1410061-002 HF02 EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.0100 mg/L 109 70 130

EM1410023-002 Anonymous EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand ---- 50 mg/L 114 70 130
EM1410061-002 HF02 EP071SG: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 75508 µg/L 108 65 149
EP071SG: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 124063 µg/L 107 57 148

EM1409974-002 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 280 µg/L 83.8 43 125

EM1409974-002 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 330 µg/L 78.9 44 122

EM1409974-002 Anonymous EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 20 µg/L 111 68 130
EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 20 µg/L 104 72 132
Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Report

The quality control term Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) refers to intralaboratory split samples spiked with a representative set of target analytes. The purpose of these QC parameters are to
monitor potential matrix effects on analyte recoveries. Static Recovery Limits as per laboratory Data Quality Objectives (DQOs). Ideal recovery ranges stated may be waived in the event of sample matrix interference.
Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Report
Spike Spike Recovery (%) Recovery Limits (%) RPDs (%)

Laboratory sample ID Client sample ID Method: Compound CAS Number Concentration MS MSD Low High Value Control Limit

EM1410091-003 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 28 mg/kg 88.5 ---- 42 131 ---- ----

EM1410091-003 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 33 mg/kg 86.7 ---- 39 129 ---- ----
3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 12 of 13

Sub-Matrix: SOIL Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Report
EP080: BTEXN (QCLot: 3655107) - continued

EM1410091-003 Anonymous EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 2 mg/kg 126 ---- 50 136 ---- ----
EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 2 mg/kg 134 ---- 56 139 ---- ----

EM1410061-006 HF02 EP071: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 817 mg/kg 92.0 ---- 71 131 ---- ----
EP071: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 3286 mg/kg 92.0 ---- 72 126 ---- ----
EP071: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 1633 mg/kg 92.5 ---- 74 122 ---- ----
EM1410061-006 HF02 EP071: >C10 - C16 Fraction >C10_C16 1157 mg/kg 91.9 ---- 73 123 ---- ----
EP071: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 4732 mg/kg 93.0 ---- 75 129 ---- ----
EP071: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 233 mg/kg 89.2 ---- 54 124 ---- ----
EM1410061-006 HF02 EP071SG-S: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 596 mg/kg 84.7 ---- 70 130 ---- ----
EP071SG-S: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 2720 mg/kg 78.1 ---- 70 130 ---- ----
EP071SG-S: C29 - C36 Fraction ---- 1373 mg/kg 91.6 ---- 70 130 ---- ----
EM1410061-006 HF02 EP071SG-S: >C10 - C16 Fraction >C10_C16 883 mg/kg 84.5 ---- 70 130 ---- ----
EP071SG-S: >C16 - C34 Fraction ---- 3759 mg/kg 99.8 ---- 70 130 ---- ----
EP071SG-S: >C34 - C40 Fraction ---- 119 mg/kg 99.0 ---- 70 130 ---- ----

EM1410067-004 Anonymous EG005T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 50 mg/kg 91.9 ---- 80 116 ---- ----
EG005T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 50 mg/kg 87.6 ---- 85 115 ---- ----
EG005T: Chromium 7440-47-3 50 mg/kg 92.8 ---- 79 119 ---- ----
EG005T: Copper 7440-50-8 50 mg/kg 92.6 ---- 83 119 ---- ----
EG005T: Lead 7439-92-1 50 mg/kg 85.1 ---- 79 117 ---- ----
EG005T: Nickel 7440-02-0 50 mg/kg 83.5 ---- 79 117 ---- ----
EG005T: Zinc 7440-66-6 50 mg/kg 81.1 ---- 75 121 ---- ----

EM1410067-004 Anonymous EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 5.0 mg/kg 80.1 ---- 76 116 ---- ----

EM1410061-006 HF02 EP026: Chemical Oxygen Demand ---- 40000 mg/kg 97.2 ---- 70 130 ---- ----

EM1410061-006 HF02 ED045G: Chloride 16887-00-6 2000 mg/kg 114 ---- 93 125 ---- ----
Sub-Matrix: WATER Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Report

EM1409974-002 Anonymous ED045G: Chloride 16887-00-6 400 mg/L 106 ---- 70 130 ---- ----
3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 13 of 13

Sub-Matrix: WATER Matrix Spike (MS) and Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) Report
EM1410061-002 HF02 EP071SG: C10 - C14 Fraction ---- 75508 µg/L 108 ---- 65 149 ---- ----
EP071SG: C15 - C28 Fraction ---- 124063 µg/L 107 ---- 57 148 ---- ----

EM1410061-002 HF02 EG035T: Mercury 7439-97-6 0.0100 mg/L 109 ---- 70 130 ---- ----
EM1410023-002 Anonymous EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand ---- 50 mg/L 114 ---- 70 130 ---- ----

EM1409974-007 Anonymous EG020A-T: Arsenic 7440-38-2 1 mg/L 102 ---- 84 116 ---- ----
EG020A-T: Cadmium 7440-43-9 0.25 mg/L 83.8 ---- 73 131 ---- ----
EG020A-T: Chromium 7440-47-3 1 mg/L 89.7 ---- 79 119 ---- ----
EG020A-T: Copper 7440-50-8 1 mg/L 93.7 ---- 78 116 ---- ----
EG020A-T: Lead 7439-92-1 1 mg/L 98.6 ---- 81 121 ---- ----
EG020A-T: Nickel 7440-02-0 1 mg/L 101 ---- 78 116 ---- ----
EG020A-T: Zinc 7440-66-6 1 mg/L 93.1 ---- 72 118 ---- ----

EM1409974-002 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C9 Fraction ---- 280 µg/L 83.8 ---- 43 125 ---- ----

EM1409974-002 Anonymous EP080: C6 - C10 Fraction C6_C10 330 µg/L 78.9 ---- 44 122 ---- ----

EM1409974-002 Anonymous EP080: Benzene 71-43-2 20 µg/L 111 ---- 68 130 ---- ----
EP080: Toluene 108-88-3 20 µg/L 104 ---- 72 132 ---- ----

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
True
Environmental
INTERPRETIVE QUALITY CONTROL REPORT
Work Order : EM1410061 Page : 1 of 11

199 MACQUARIE ST
Site : ----
This report supersedes any previous report(s) with this reference. Results apply to the sample(s) as submitted. All pages of this report have been checked and approved for release.
This Interpretive Quality Control Report contains the following information:

l Analysis Holding Time Compliance
l Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance
l Brief Method Summaries
l Summary of Outliers

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 2 of 11


Analysis Holding Time Compliance

This report summarizes extraction / preparation and analysis times and compares each with recommended holding times (USEPA SW 846, APHA, AS and NEPM) based on the sample container provided. Dates
reported represent first date of extraction or analysis and preclude subsequent dilutions and reruns. A listing of breaches (if any) is provided herein.
Holding time for leachate methods (e.g. TCLP) vary according to the analytes reported. Assessment compares the leach date with the shortest analyte holding time for the equivalent soil method. These are: organics
14 days, mercury 28 days & other metals 180 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all non-volatile parameters.
Holding times for VOC in soils vary according to analytes of interest. Vinyl Chloride and Styrene holding time is 7 days; others 14 days. A recorded breach does not guarantee a breach for all VOC analytes and
should be verified in case the reported breach is a false positive or Vinyl Chloride and Styrene are not key analytes of interest/concern.
Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time.
Method Sample Date Extraction / Preparation Analysis
Container / Client Sample ID(s) Date extracted Due for extraction Evaluation Date analysed Due for analysis Evaluation
EA055: Moisture Content

Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EA055-103)
---- ---- 09-OCT-2014
HF01, HF02, 25-SEP-2014 ---- 30-SEP-2014 ü
HF03, HF04
ED037: Alkalinity
Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (ED037)
24-MAR-2015 24-MAR-2015
HF01, HF02, 25-SEP-2014 03-OCT-2014 ü 03-OCT-2014 ü
HF03, HF04
Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (ED045G)
23-OCT-2014 31-OCT-2014
HF03, HF04
ED093S: Soluble Major Cations
Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (ED093S)
24-MAR-2015 24-MAR-2015
HF03, HF04
EG005T: Total Metals by ICP-AES
Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG005T)
24-MAR-2015 24-MAR-2015
HF03, HF04
Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EG035T)
23-OCT-2014 23-OCT-2014
HF03, HF04
EP003: Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in Soil
Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP003)
23-OCT-2014 23-OCT-2014
HF03, HF04
EP026: Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
---- ---- 24-MAR-2015
HF01, HF02, 25-SEP-2014 ---- 03-OCT-2014 ü
HF03, HF04

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 3 of 11


Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time.


09-OCT-2014 10-NOV-2014
HF03, HF04
EP071 SG-S: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil - Silica gel cleanup
Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP071SG-S)
09-OCT-2014 10-NOV-2014
HF03, HF04
Soil Glass Jar - Unpreserved (EP071SG-S)
09-OCT-2014 10-NOV-2014
HF03, HF04
EP080: BTEXN
09-OCT-2014 09-OCT-2014
HF01, HF02, 25-SEP-2014 30-SEP-2014 ü 03-OCT-2014 ü
HF03, HF04
09-OCT-2014 09-OCT-2014
HF01, HF02, 25-SEP-2014 30-SEP-2014 ü 03-OCT-2014 ü
HF03, HF04
Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time.

ED037P: Alkalinity by PC Titrator

Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural (ED037-P)
09-OCT-2014 ---- 09-OCT-2014
HF01, HF02, 25-SEP-2014 --- 30-SEP-2014 ü
HF03, HF04
Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural (ED045G)
23-OCT-2014 ---- 23-OCT-2014
HF01, HF02, 25-SEP-2014 --- 30-SEP-2014 ü
HF03, HF04
ED093F: Dissolved Major Cations
Clear Plastic Bottle - Natural (ED093F)
02-OCT-2014 ---- 02-OCT-2014
HF01, HF02, 25-SEP-2014 --- 01-OCT-2014 ü
HF03, HF04
EG020T: Total Metals by ICP-MS
Clear Plastic Bottle - Unfiltered; Lab-acidified (EG020A-T)
24-MAR-2015 24-MAR-2015
HF03, HF04

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 4 of 11


Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Holding time breach ; ü = Within holding time.


Clear Plastic Bottle - Unfiltered; Lab-acidified (EG035T)
---- ---- 23-OCT-2014
HF01, HF02, 25-SEP-2014 ---- 01-OCT-2014 ü
HF03, HF04
EP026SP: Chemical Oxygen Demand (Spectrophotometric)
Clear Plastic Bottle - Sulfuric Acid (EP026SP)
---- ---- 23-OCT-2014
HF01, HF02, 25-SEP-2014 ---- 01-OCT-2014 ü
HF03, HF04
Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved (EP071)
02-OCT-2014 09-NOV-2014
HF03, HF04
EP071 SG: Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Silica gel cleanup
Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved (EP071SG)
02-OCT-2014 09-NOV-2014
HF03, HF04
Amber Glass Bottle - Unpreserved (EP071SG)
02-OCT-2014 09-NOV-2014
HF03, HF04
EP080: BTEXN
Amber VOC Vial - Sulfuric Acid (EP080)
09-OCT-2014 09-OCT-2014
HF03, HF04
Amber VOC Vial - Sulfuric Acid (EP080)
09-OCT-2014 09-OCT-2014
HF03, HF04

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 5 of 11


Quality Control Parameter Frequency Compliance

The following report summarises the frequency of laboratory QC samples analysed within the analytical lot(s) in which the submitted sample(s) was(where) processed. Actual rate should be greater than or equal to
the expected rate. A listing of breaches is provided in the Summary of Outliers.
Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification.
Quality Control Sample Type Count Rate (%) Quality Control Specification
Analytical Methods Method QC Regular Actual Expected Evaluation
Laboratory Duplicates (DUP)

Alkalinity in Soil 1 4 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
ED037 25.0 10.0 ü
Cations - soluble by ICP-AES 1 4 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
ED093S 25.0 10.0 ü
Chemical Oxygen Demand 1 4 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EP026 25.0 10.0 ü
Chloride Soluble By Discrete Analyser 1 6 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
ED045G 16.7 10.0 ü
Moisture Content 2 20 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EA055-103 10.0 10.0 ü
Total Mercury by FIMS 2 17 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EG035T 11.8 10.0 ü
Total Metals by ICP-AES 2 19 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EG005T 10.5 10.0 ü
Total Organic Carbon 2 11 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EP003 18.2 10.0 ü
TRH - Semivolatile Fraction 2 14 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EP071 14.3 10.0 ü
TRH - Semivolatile Fraction (Silica Gel Clean Up) 1 4 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EP071SG-S 25.0 10.0 ü
TRH Volatiles/BTEX 1 6 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EP080 16.7 10.0 ü
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS)
Alkalinity in Soil 1 4 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
ED037 25.0 5.0 ü
ED093S 25.0 5.0 ü
EP026 25.0 5.0 ü
ED045G 33.3 10.0 ü
EG035T 5.9 5.0 ü
EG005T 5.3 5.0 ü
EP003 9.1 5.0 ü
EP071 7.1 5.0 ü
EP071SG-S 25.0 5.0 ü
EP080 16.7 5.0 ü
Method Blanks (MB)
ED093S 25.0 5.0 ü
EP026 25.0 5.0 ü
ED045G 16.7 5.0 ü
EG035T 5.9 5.0 ü
EG005T 5.3 5.0 ü
EP003 9.1 5.0 ü
EP071 7.1 5.0 ü
EP071SG-S 25.0 5.0 ü
EP080 16.7 5.0 ü
Matrix Spikes (MS)
EP026 25.0 5.0 ü
ED045G 16.7 5.0 ü
3747740
EG035T 5.9 5.0 ü
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 6 of 11


Matrix: SOIL Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification.
Matrix Spikes (MS) - Continued

EG005T 5.3 5.0 ü
EP071 7.1 5.0 ü
EP071SG-S 25.0 5.0 ü
EP080 16.7 5.0 ü
Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification.
Laboratory Duplicates (DUP)

Alkalinity by PC Titrator 2 20 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
ED037-P 10.0 10.0 ü
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) (Spectrophotometric) 2 19 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EP026SP 10.5 10.0 ü
Chloride by Discrete Analyser 2 17 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
ED045G 11.8 10.0 ü
Major Cations - Dissolved 2 17 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
ED093F 11.8 10.0 ü
EG035T 11.1 10.0 ü
Total Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A 2 20 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EG020A-T 10.0 10.0 ü
EP071 10.5 10.0 ü
EP080 10.0 10.0 ü
Laboratory Control Samples (LCS)
Alkalinity by PC Titrator 1 20 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
ED037-P 5.0 5.0 ü
EP026SP 5.3 5.0 ü
ED045G 11.8 10.0 ü
ED093F 5.9 5.0 ü
EG035T 11.1 5.0 ü
EG020A-T 5.0 5.0 ü
EP071 5.3 5.0 ü
TRH - Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - Silica Gel C 1 4 NEPM 2013 Schedule B(3) and ALS QCS3 requirement
EP071SG 25.0 5.0 ü
EP080 5.0 5.0 ü
Method Blanks (MB)
EP026SP 5.3 5.0 ü
ED045G 5.9 5.0 ü
ED093F 5.9 5.0 ü
EG035T 11.1 5.0 ü
EG020A-T 5.0 5.0 ü
EP071 5.3 5.0 ü
EP071SG 25.0 5.0 ü
EP080 5.0 5.0 ü
Matrix Spikes (MS)
EP026SP 5.3 5.0 ü
ED045G 5.9 5.0 ü
EG035T 11.1 5.0 ü
3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 7 of 11


Matrix: WATER Evaluation: û = Quality Control frequency not within specification ; ü = Quality Control frequency within specification.
Matrix Spikes (MS) - Continued

EG020A-T 5.0 5.0 ü
EP071SG 25.0 5.0 ü
EP080 5.0 5.0 ü

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 8 of 11


Brief Method Summaries

The analytical procedures used by the Environmental Division have been developed from established internationally recognized procedures such as those published by the US EPA, APHA, AS and NEPM. In house
developed procedures are employed in the absence of documented standards or by client request. The following report provides brief descriptions of the analytical procedures employed for results reported in the
Certificate of Analysis. Sources from which ALS methods have been developed are provided within the Method Descriptions.
Analytical Methods Method Matrix Method Descriptions
Moisture Content EA055-103 SOIL A gravimetric procedure based on weight loss over a 12 hour drying period at 103-105 degrees C. This method
is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) Section 7.1 and Table 1 (14 day holding time).
Alkalinity in Soil ED037 SOIL APHA 21st ed., 2320 B Alkalinity is determined and reported on a 1:5 soil/water leach.
Chloride Soluble By Discrete Analyser ED045G SOIL APHA 21st edition 4500-Cl- E. The thiocyanate ion is liberated from mercuric thiocyanate through sequestration
of mercury by the chloride ion to form non-ionised mercuric chloride.in the presence of ferric ions the librated
thiocynate forms highly-coloured ferric thiocynate which is measured at 480 nm. Analysis is performed on a 1:5
soil / water leachate.
Cations - soluble by ICP-AES ED093S SOIL APHA 21st ed., 3120; USEPA SW 846 - 6010 (ICPAES) Water extracts of the soil are analyzed for major cations by
ICPAES. The ICPAES technique ionises samples in a plasma, emitting a characteristic spectrum based on
metals present. Intensities at selected wavelengths are compared against those of matrix matched standards.
This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Total Metals by ICP-AES EG005T SOIL (APHA 21st ed., 3120; USEPA SW 846 - 6010) (ICPAES) Metals are determined following an appropriate acid
digestion of the soil. The ICPAES technique ionises samples in a plasma, emitting a characteristic spectrum
based on metals present. Intensities at selected wavelengths are compared against those of matrix matched
standards. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Total Mercury by FIMS EG035T SOIL AS 3550, APHA 21st ed., 3112 Hg - B (Flow-injection (SnCl2)(Cold Vapour generation) AAS) FIM-AAS is an
automated flameless atomic absorption technique. Mercury in solids are determined following an appropriate
acid digestion. Ionic mercury is reduced online to atomic mercury vapour by SnCl2 which is then purged into a
heated quartz cell. Quantification is by comparing absorbance against a calibration curve. This method is
compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Total Organic Carbon EP003 SOIL In-house C-IR17. Dried and pulverised sample is reacted with acid to remove inorganic Carbonates, then
combusted in a LECO furnace in the presence of strong oxidants / catalysts. The evolved (Organic) Carbon (as
CO2) is automaticaly measured by infra-red detector.
Chemical Oxygen Demand EP026 SOIL APHA 21st ed., 5220 B Dichromate oxidation with titration finish
TRH - Semivolatile Fraction EP071 SOIL (USEPA SW 846 - 8015A) Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/FID and quantified against alkane
standards over the range C10 - C40.
TRH - Semivolatile Fraction (Silica Gel EP071SG-S SOIL (USEPA SW 846 - 8015A) Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/FID and quantified against alkane
Clean Up) standards over the range C10 - C40.
TRH Volatiles/BTEX EP080 SOIL (USEPA SW 846 - 8260B) Extracts are analysed by Purge and Trap, Capillary GC/MS. Quantification is by
comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve.
Alkalinity by PC Titrator ED037-P WATER APHA 21st ed., 2320 B This procedure determines alkalinity by automated measurement (e.g. PC Titrate) using
pH 4.5 for indicating the total alkalinity end-point. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Chloride by Discrete Analyser ED045G WATER APHA 21st ed., 4500 Cl - G.The thiocyanate ion is liberated from mercuric thiocyanate through sequestration of
mercury by the chloride ion to form non-ionised mercuric chloride.in the presence of ferric ions the librated
thiocynate forms highly-coloured ferric thiocynate which is measured at 480 nm APHA 21st edition seal method 2
017-1-L april 2003

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 9 of 11


Analytical Methods Method Matrix Method Descriptions

Major Cations - Dissolved ED093F WATER Major Cations is determined based on APHA 21st ed., 3120; USEPA SW 846 - 6010 The ICPAES technique
ionises the 0.45um filtered sample atoms emitting a characteristic spectrum. This spectrum is then compared
against matrix matched standards for quantification. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Sodium Adsorption Ratio is calculated from Ca, Mg and Na which determined by ALS in house method
QWI-EN/ED093F. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Hardness parameters are calculated based on APHA 21st ed., 2340 B. This method is compliant with NEPM
(2013) Schedule B(3)
Total Metals by ICP-MS - Suite A EG020A-T WATER (APHA 21st ed., 3125; USEPA SW846 - 6020, ALS QWI-EN/EG020): The ICPMS technique utilizes a highly
efficient argon plasma to ionize selected elements. Ions are then passed into a high vacuum mass
spectrometer, which separates the analytes based on their distinct mass to charge ratios prior to their
measurement by a discrete dynode ion detector.
Total Mercury by FIMS EG035T WATER AS 3550, APHA 21st ed. 3112 Hg - B (Flow-injection (SnCl2)(Cold Vapour generation) AAS) FIM-AAS is an
automated flameless atomic absorption technique. A bromate/bromide reagent is used to oxidise any organic
mercury compounds in the unfiltered sample. The ionic mercury is reduced online to atomic mercury vapour by
SnCl2 which is then purged into a heated quartz cell. Quantification is by comparing absorbance against a
calibration curve. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) EP026SP WATER APHA 21st ed., 5220 D. Samples are digested with a known excess of an acidic potassium dichromate solution
(Spectrophotometric) using silver sulfate as a catalyst. The chromium is reduced from the Cr (VI) oxidation state to the Cr (III) state by
the oxygen present in the organic material. Both of these chromium species are coloued and absorb in the
visible region of (400nm & 600nm) the spectrum. The oxidisable organic matter can be calculated in terms of
oxygen equivalents.
TRH - Semivolatile Fraction EP071 WATER USEPA SW 846 - 8015A The sample extract is analysed by Capillary GC/FID and quantification is by comparison
against an established 5 point calibration curve of n-Alkane standards. This method is compliant with the QC
requirements of NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
TRH - Total Recoverable Hydrocarbons - EP071SG WATER (USEPA SW 846 - 8015A) Sample extracts are analysed by Capillary GC/FID and quantified against alkane
Silica Gel C standards over the range C10 - C36. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) (Method 506.1)
TRH Volatiles/BTEX EP080 WATER USEPA SW 846 - 8260B Water samples are directly purged prior to analysis by Capillary GC/MS and
quantification is by comparison against an established 5 point calibration curve. Alternatively, a sample is
equilibrated in a headspace vial and a portion of the headspace determined by GCMS analysis. This method is
compliant with the QC requirements of NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3)
Preparation Methods Method Matrix Method Descriptions
1:5 solid / water leach for soluble EN34 SOIL 10 g of soil is mixed with 50 mL of distilled water and tumbled end over end for 1 hour. Water soluble salts are
analytes leached from the soil by the continuous suspension. Samples are settled and the water filtered off for analysis.
Methanolic Extraction of Soils for Purge ORG16 SOIL (USEPA SW 846 - 5030A) 5g of solid is shaken with surrogate and 10mL methanol prior to analysis by Purge
and Trap and Trap - GC/MS.
Tumbler Extraction of Solids ORG17 SOIL In-house, Mechanical agitation (tumbler). 10g of sample, Na2SO4 and surrogate are extracted with 30mL 1:1
DCM/Acetone by end over end tumble. The solvent is decanted, dehydrated and concentrated (by KD) to the
desired volume for analysis.

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 10 of 11


Preparation Methods Method Matrix Method Descriptions

Tumbler Extraction of Solids/ Silica Gel ORG17A-SG SOIL In-house, Mechanical agitation (tumbler). 20g of sample, Na2SO4 and surrogate are extracted with 150mL 1:1
Clean Up DCM/Acetone by end over end tumble. The solvent is decanted, dehydrated and concentrated (by KD) to the
desired volume for analysis.
Digestion for Total Recoverable Metals EN25 WATER USEPA SW846-3005 Method 3005 is a Nitric/Hydrochloric acid digestion procedure used to prepare surface and
ground water samples for analysis by ICPAES or ICPMS. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule
B(3)
Separatory Funnel Extraction of Liquids ORG14 WATER USEPA SW 846 - 3510B 100 mL to 1L of sample is transferred to a separatory funnel and serially extracted three
times using 60mL DCM for each extract. The resultant extracts are combined, dehydrated and concentrated for
analysis. This method is compliant with NEPM (2013) Schedule B(3) . ALS default excludes sediment which
may be resident in the container.

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Page
: 11 of 11


Summary of Outliers
Outliers : Quality Control Samples
The following report highlights outliers flagged in the Quality Control (QC) Report. Surrogate recovery limits are static and based on USEPA SW 846 or ALS-QWI/EN/38 (in the absence of specific USEPA limits). This
report displays QC Outliers (breaches) only.
Duplicates, Method Blanks, Laboratory Control Samples and Matrix Spikes

l For all matrices, no Method Blank value outliers occur.
l For all matrices, no Duplicate outliers occur.
l For all matrices, no Laboratory Control outliers occur.
l For all matrices, no Matrix Spike outliers occur.
Regular Sample Surrogates

Sub-Matrix: WATER
Compound Group Name Laboratory Sample ID Client Sample ID Analyte CAS Number Data Limits Comment
Samples Submitted
EP080S: TPH(V)/BTEX Surrogates EM1410061-004 HF04 1.2-Dichloroethane-D4 17060-07-0 61.3 % 73-129 % Recovery less than lower data quality
objective
Outliers : Analysis Holding Time Compliance

This report displays Holding Time breaches only. Only the respective Extraction / Preparation and/or Analysis component is/are displayed.
l No Analysis Holding Time Outliers exist.
Outliers : Frequency of Quality Control Samples

The following report highlights breaches in the Frequency of Quality Control Samples.
l No Quality Control Sample Frequency Outliers exist.

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Contact
Doug Tangney
0458 710 098
dtangney@pittsh.com.au
transport | community | industrial & mining | carbon & energy
Brisbane Hobart Melbourne E: info@pittsh.com.au

Level 2 199 Macquarie Street Level 1, HWT Tower W: www.pittsh.com.au
276 Edward Street GPO Box 94 40 City Road
Brisbane QLD 4000 Hobart TAS 7001 Southbank VIC 3006 incorporated as
T: (07) 3221 0080 T: (03) 6210 1400 PO Box 259 Pitt & Sherry (Operations) Pty Ltd
F: (07) 3221 0083 F: (03) 6223 1299 South Melbourne VIC 3205 ABN 67 140 184 309
T: (03) 9682 5290
F: (03) 9682 5292
Canberra Launceston
LGF, Ethos House Level 4
28-36 Ainslie Place 113 Cimitiere Street Sydney
Canberra City ACT 2601 PO Box 1409 Level 1
PO Box 122 Launceston TAS 7250 56 Clarence Street
Civic Square T: (03) 6323 1900 Sydney NSW 2000
Canberra ACT 2608 F: (03) 6334 4651 T: (02) 8216 4700
T: (02) 6295 2100 F: (02) 8216 4747
F: (02) 6274 0150
Devonport
Level 1
35 Oldaker Street
PO Box 836
Devonport TAS 7310
T: (03) 6424 1641
F: (03) 6424 9215

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
GHD
2 Salamanca Square
T: 61 3 6210 0600 F: 61 3 6210 0601 E: hbamail@ghd.com
© GHD 2018
This document is and shall remain the property of GHD. The document may only be used for the
purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the
commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited.
3218251-
50133/https://projects.ghd.com/oc/Tasmania/churchillparkmasterp/Delivery/Documents/3218251
Churchill Park Additional Sports Fields 20170320.docx
Document Status
Revision Author Reviewer Approved for Issue
Name Signature Name Signature Date
0 Ryan John Ayers Alex Brownlie 31/1/2018
Robinson

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
www.ghd.com

3747740
Version: 2,
01/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
07 May 2018
Barry Pickett Our ref: 3218251-47655

Your ref:
Natural Environment Manager
City of Launceston
PO Box 396
Launceston TAS 7250
Dear Barry
Churchill Park Master Plan

Suitability of Potential Contaminated Land
1 Background
The City of Launceston (Council) intends to make improvements to the existing recreation grounds
(Churchill Park Sports Complex) located off Churchill Park Drive, Invermay, Tasmania (the Site). The
majority of the Site has previously been developed (for sports and recreation) on a closed municipal
landfill that stopped receiving waste approximately 30-40 years ago.
The planned development works primarily relate to surface improvements (refer attached figure):
 Improvements to permeable surfacing across the existing carpark area (southern section)
 Expansion of the existing carpark (southern section)
 Improvements to existing sports fields including resurfacing (northern section)
 Minor associated landscaping
It is anticipated that these improvements will generally relate to shallow excavation, indicatively up to
300-400 mm depth. This will allow for improvements in base layers (geotechnical requirements) requiring
the importing of controlled fill (such as fine crushed rock (FCR) and/or sand). It is anticipated that deeper
localised excavations will be required to address specific features such as fence foundations and
stormwater system improvements. These features are anticipated to require indicative maximum
excavation depths of 400-750mm. The proposed improvements do not include the addition of buildings
or sealed surfaces.
2 Objective
The objective of this letter is to address requirements within the ‘Potentially Contaminated Land Code’
(the Code), to ensure that the use or development of potentially contaminated land does not adversely
impact on human health or the environment.
This development program has triggered ‘the Code’ in response to the Site being considered potentially
contaminated due to being developed on a closed municipal landfill.

Version: 2, Version Date: 04/06/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
This letter does not represent a contamination assessment of the broader legacy landfill site, but is
specifically designed to address management of the potential contamination in the context of the
proposed improvement works. The key potential receptors are considered to be:
 Construction workers during ground works and excavation

 The environment, where excavated material is to be relocated on-Site or off-Site
 Users of the Site including the public, Site staff and maintenance workers
3 Existing Assessment Work

The following information was made available in order to inform the conclusions drawn in this letter.
 GHD (2018a) First Basin and Churchill Park Upgrades, Site Investigations Report, geotechnical
investigations for City of Launceston;
 GHD (2018b) Churchill Park Concept Master Plan, drawing 3218251-SK001 showing indicative
improvements; and
 Site inspection (April 2018) by Peter Topliss, GHD Technical Director - Contamination and
Remediation, and discussions with key stakeholders including GHD Civil Engineer and Council staff.
The Site has not been subject to a detailed site investigation and while there has been limited existing
environment assessment(s) conducted on the Site, it is understood this primarily relates to stormwater
investigations and has limited influence on this review. Consistent with many closed landfills within
Tasmania, there is limited information available on how the landfill was designed and in particular, the
engineering specifications of the landfill cap.
Key finding of the existing assessment work include:
 Geotechnical testing included three test pits within the southern section of the site (shown on the
attached figure). This identified relatively consistent ‘cap’ material and thickness across the
investigation area (sandy CLAY 0.9-1.1m thick over municipal waste). No groundwater ingress was
identified during test pitting.
 Improvements in the southern section of the Site will generate surplus material requiring relocation
(i.e. on-site reuse for landscaping), and a general increase in surface levels in the northern section of
the Site (i.e. net importing of material).
4 Potential Contamination Risks

The primary potential contamination risks associated with the improvement works relate to both
construction and end use scenarios. The potential risks are considered low as the proposed
development:
 Does not significantly change the current land use
 Does not increase the current risk profile (i.e. does not include building structures)
 Has a low likelihood of encountering buried waste (limit excavation depths)
As such it is proposed that the residual risks be addressed through development of a plan to manage the
potential contamination risks so that the excavation(s) do not adversely impact on human health or the
environment, and that the land is suitable for the intended use for on-going sports and recreation.
3218251/3218251-005-Churchill Park Master Plan-Suitability of Potential 2

Contaminated Land.docx

PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
During the construction phase there are increased risks associated with exposure to potential
contamination (i.e. dermal contact and vapour exposure), primarily associated with excavation works.
This can be effectively managed by incorporating the following tasks into a Construction Environmental
Management Plan (CEMP), so the excavation work does not adversely impact human health (or the
environment):
Exposure to waste
 Available information suggests the landfill cap material (soil type and thickness) is relatively
consistent across the southern development footprint (0.9 – 1.1m). The proposed excavation depths
(up to 0.75 m) include sufficient buffer so that excavations should not encounter landfill waste
material itself.
 As the potential remains for excavations to encounter waste where the cap thickness is thinner than
identified above (or where excavations are required to be deeper than originally planned), a
response plan is required to ensure the construction team is prepared to address such a scenario.
This would include ceasing work in that area and seeking advice from a suitably qualified
professional in addressing both the risk to workers and management of potentially contaminated
excavated soil.
 Where construction workers are required to enter trenches and excavation (i.e. for localised
foundations and/or utility trenches) there is an increased risk of exposure to vapours such as
methane or petroleum hydrocarbons collecting in excavations. If worker access to
trenches/excavation is required, then a suitably qualified professional should be engaged to develop
an appropriate monitoring program to assess exposure risk. This control is not considered necessary
for general resurfacing work.
Management of excavated soil

 The existing assessment of the cap material suggest it represents a low and acceptable risk to
workers (sandy CLAY with an absence of municipal waste), and that standard PPE and good
hygiene practices should be sufficient controls to manage the risk.
 As the potential remains for excavations to encounter pockets of contamination (i.e. contaminated
cap material, rather than municipal waste), a similar response plan is required to ensure the
construction team is appropriately prepared (i.e. when encountering odorous soil and/or potential
asbestos containing material/fragments). This would include ceasing work in that area and seeking
advice from a suitably qualified professional in addressing both the risk to workers and management
of potentially contaminated excavated soil.
 No excavated material is to be removed from Site without prior characterisation and regulatory
approval (where required). Where excavated material is to be reused on-site (i.e. for landscaping)
validation sampling should be conducted to ensure it is suitable for its intended use (i.e. NEPM HIL-
C Public Open Space1). Where excavated material is reused beneath new surface material (i.e. new
turf or carpark wearing surface), validation is not considered necessary.
As the improvement for carparks and sports grounds include provision of additional surface cover
material (over the existing cap material), there is no net increased exposure risk to future users of the
Site on the assumption that appropriate imported fill materials are utilised.
1
National Environmental Protection (Assessment of Site Contamination) Measure 1999, Schedule B 1 – Guidelines on
Investigation Levels for Soil and Groundwater, Health investigation levels - Recreational


PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
5 Conclusion
In the context of Clause E2.6.2 of the Code, the improvements (including excavation) do not represent a
potential unacceptable risk to human health or the environment where the works are subject to the
specific protection measures/controls identified above (i.e. development of CEMP controls). This is
because the residual risk is primarily in the underlying waste, and not in the cap material.
Based on our understanding of the intended upgrade works, underlying waste materials is unlikely to be
encountered or disturbed during the works. As such, risks would be limited to unexpected finds within the
capping materials and could be managed through appropriate protocols and procedures which would be
documented in the CEMP as outlined above,
Additionally the end use is consistent with the current recreational use of the Site and does not represent
an increased risk profile. Open space/recreational use is considered desirable for suburban closed
landfills scenarios and is a common use for these types of land
This letter has been reviewed by a ‘suitably qualified person’, be represented by a certified practitioner,
Site Assessment and Management with SCP Australia.
Sincerely Sincerely
GHD GHD
Peter Topliss Jacqui Hallchurch

Technical Director – Contamination & Remediation SCPA Certified Practitioner (CP SAM)
+61 3 6210 0663 Certification Number 17018
+61 2 9293 7046
Attachment 1 – Indicative Site Development Plan


PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Assumptions and Limitations

This report: has been prepared by GHD for City of Launceston and may only be used and relied on by
City of Launceston for the purpose agreed between GHD and the City of Launceston as set out in this
report.
GHD otherwise disclaims responsibility to any person other than City of Launceston arising in connection
with this report. GHD also excludes implied warranties and conditions, to the extent legally permissible.
The services undertaken by GHD in connection with preparing this report were limited to those
specifically detailed in the report and are subject to the scope limitations set out in the report.
The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this report are based on conditions encountered
and information reviewed at the date of preparation of the report. GHD has no responsibility or obligation
to update this report to account for events or changes occurring subsequent to the date that the report
was prepared.
The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this report are based on assumptions made by
GHD described in this report. GHD disclaims liability arising from any of the assumptions being
incorrect.
GHD has prepared this report on the basis of information provided by City of Launceston and others who
provided information to GHD, which GHD has not independently verified or checked beyond the agreed
scope of work. GHD does not accept liability in connection with such unverified information, including
errors and omissions in the report which were caused by errors or omissions in that information.
The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this report are based on information obtained
from, and testing undertaken at or in connection with, specific sample points. Site conditions at other
parts of the Site may be different from the Site conditions found at the specific sample points.
Investigations undertaken in respect of this report are constrained by the particular Site conditions, such
as the location of buildings, services and vegetation. As a result, not all relevant Site features and
conditions may have been identified in this report.
Site conditions (including the presence of hazardous substances and/or Site contamination) may change
after the date of this Report. GHD does not accept responsibility arising from, or in connection with, any
change to the Site conditions. GHD is also not responsible for updating this report if the Site conditions
change.


PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Assumptions and Limitations Attachment 1 – Indicative Site Development Plan

(extracted from Concept Master Plan Drawing SK001, showing geotechnical test pit locations in red)


PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
26 March 2018
Mr Richard Jamieson Our ref: 32/18251

23007
Manager City Development Your ref:
City of Launceston
PO Box 396
LAUNCESTON TAS 7250
Dear Sir,
Churchill Park Master Plan

Development Application - Response to Further Information Request
The following information is provided in response to your request for further information relative to
DA0098/2018. I understand that the issue of site contamination has been resolved.
1. Clause 8.1 Application requirements
A revised master plan is attached which shows the ultimate development of the site as outlined in the
planning submission lodged, please refer to paragraphs 4.1 and 4.2. Hence the reference to the future
path and storage facility. Notwithstanding these elements have been removed from the development
plan. In addition, 2 plans showing the indicative car parking is provided for stage 1 and stages 2 and 3.
Stage 1 includes the elements which will be undertaken initially and for which the Council has funding.
A copy of the certificate of title for each site identified in this application is attached with this letter.
2. Clause E6.0
Indicative car park plans for each of the stages 1, 2 and 3 are attached. This includes the identification of
proposed car park numbers and associated facilities. The indicative layout demonstrates that 550 car
spaces can be provided on site to meet the eventual demand. Please refer to the discussion of the Code
at page 23 of the submission.
Accessible car parking (10) and motorcycle (5) spaces are shown and will be provided as part of stage 1.
The development plan provides an area of 200m 2 located immediately east of the proposed soccer
ground #2. This will allow in excess of 50 bicycle spaces, and will be provided as part of the development
of the new playing fields.
Note that the dimensions for the parking spaces are in accordance with AS/NZS 2890.1 for User Class 2
(sports facilities).

3766772
Version: 2,
27/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Clause E6.0
E6.6.1 Construction of Car Parks
Objective - To ensure that parking areas are constructed to an appropriate standard.
Consistent
Detailed design of the carpark areas will ensure construction in accordance with the scheme standard.
The drainage of surface water is achieved through the inclusion of drainage works connecting the site
to the existing drainage system.
A1 P1
All parking, access ways, manoeuvring and All parking, access ways, manoeuvring and
circulation spaces must: circulation spaces must be readily identifiable
(a) have a gradient of 10% or less; and constructed to ensure that they are useable
in all weather conditions, having regard to:
(b) be formed and paved;
(a) the nature of the use;
(c) be drained to the public stormwater system, or
contain stormwater on the site; (b) the topography of the land;
(d) except for a single dwelling, and all uses in (c) the drainage system available;
the Rural Resource, Environmental Management (d) the likelihood of transporting sediment or
and Open Space zones, be provided with an debris from the site onto a road or public place;
impervious all weather seal; and (e) the likelihood of generating dust; and
(e) except for a single dwelling, be line marked or (f) the nature of the proposed surfacing and line
provided with other clear physical means to marking.
delineate parking spaces.
Complies with P1
The proposed parking areas are designed to be clearly identifiable and to remain useable in all
weather conditions.
(a) The proposed development includes upgrades and expansions to existing car parking areas
used by visitors to the sporting and recreational facilities. Total parking numbers will satisfy the
requirements of the ultimate development, including the additional sports fields. The contouring
of the site and incorporation of stormwater drainage will ensure the carpark is appropriate and fit
for purpose.
(b) The site is virtually flat allowing for safe circulation and manoeuvring areas for users of the car
park.
(c) The redevelopment of the parking areas will incorporate stormwater drainage to adequately drain
the site to the existing drainage network.
(d) It is unlikely that sediment or debris will be transported to a road or public place given the
drainage work proposed and compaction of the surface.
(e) Dust generation will be minimal given that the surface will be compacted.
(f) The gravel surface will not allow line marking of the finished surface, however the flat
characteristics of the site and the extent of area available allows for safe and efficient use of the
car park areas by site patrons. Notwithstanding, the accessible car spaces will be signed. The
site access road will be sealed and the introduction of linear landscaping will assist use
differentiation. Note that the existing car park at the site is not sealed and patrons use of the area
in not unduly affected.
32/18251/23007 2

3766772
Version: 2,
27/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Clause E6.6.2
E6.6.2 Design and Layout of Parking Areas
Objective - To ensure that parking areas are designed and laid out to provide convenient, safe and
efficient parking.
Consistent
The proposed parking area includes 550 unmarked parking spaces in total, to be developed over three
stages of development. The proposed layout is shown on drawings SK014 and SK015 - Indicative car
parking layouts.
The first stage of development will include 341 standard parking spaces, 10 accessible parking
spaces, and 5 motorcycle parking spaces. Access will be via a 6.5m wide, spray sealed access road
allowing traffic movement in one direction around the main parking area. Accessible parking spaces
will be located in the northern-most section of the proposed parking area, closest to recreational
facilities and sports fields. Motorcycle parking spaces will be located nearby.
A layby area for busses and taxis will be located to the western shoulder of the western-most section
of the access road, which will abut a 1.5m wide gravel path for pedestrian access.
Pedestrian access will be via a shared pedestrian and cycle path to the north and west of the Stage 1
parking area.
A1.1 P1
Car parking, access ways, manoeuvring and circulation spaces must: Car parking, access ways,
(a) provide for vehicles to enter and exit the site in a forward direction manoeuvring and circulation
where providing for more than 4 parking spaces; spaces must be convenient,
safe and efficient to use,
(b) have a width of vehicular access no less than the requirements in
having regard to:
Table E6.2, and no more than 10% greater than the requirements in
Table E6.2; (a) the characteristics of the
site;
(c) have parking space dimensions in accordance with the
requirements in Table E6.3; (b) the proposed slope,
dimensions and layout;
(d) have a combined access and manoeuvring width adjacent to
parking spaces not less than the requirements in Table E6.3 where (c) vehicle and pedestrian
there are 3 or more car parking spaces; and traffic safety;
(e) have a vertical clearance of not less than 2.1 metres above the (d) the nature and use of the
parking surface level. development;
(e) the expected number
A1.2
and type of vehicles;
All accessible spaces for use by persons with a disability must be (f) the nature of traffic in the
located closest to the main entry point to the building. surrounding area; and
A1.3 (g) the provisions of
Australian Standards AS
Accessible spaces for people with disability must be designated and
2890.1 - Parking Facilities,
signed as accessible spaces where there are 6 spaces or more.
Part 1: Off Road Car
A1.4 Parking and AS2890.2
Parking Facilities, Part 2:
Accessible car parking spaces for use by persons with disabilities must
Parking facilities - Off-street
be designed and constructed in accordance with AS/NZ2890.6 – 2009
commercial vehicle facilities.
Parking facilities - Off-street parking for people with disabilities.
32/18251/23007 3

3766772
Version: 2,
27/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Complies with P1
Car parking areas proposed for the development will have distinguishable and clear areas for the
convenient and safe manoeuvring and circulation of vehicles, having regard to:
(a) the characteristics of the site. The proposed parking area is located adjacent the site access
point. The proposed access road will loop around the central and largest parking area to improve
access to available parking spaces, improving traffic circulation. This layout will efficiently
concentrate vehicle movements to the parking area and maximise the use of the site for
recreational purposes.
(b) the proposed slope, dimensions and layout. The site of proposed car parking is relatively flat,
enabling the introduction of a total 550 car spaces over 3 stages, designed in accordance with
the requirements of the Code.
(c) vehicle and pedestrian traffic safety. A combined bicycle and pedestrian path adjacent the
northern side of the car park will provide for pedestrian and vehicle separation. Proposed
upgrades include spray sealed bituminous surfacing to the 6.5m wide access road providing
space for vehicles to safely manoeuvre between parking areas and the access road.
(d) the nature and use of the development. The proposed parking area upgrades will improve and
concentrate existing parking facilities that service recreational facilities, including soccer, cricket,
and softball fields, walking and cycling paths, and other recreational uses. General traffic
movements will be restricted to the parking area at the southern end of the site, and existing
vehicle access to the mid-western section of the site will be restricted to service vehicles, helping
to separate vehicles and pedestrians within the site.
(e) the expected number and type of vehicles. Car parking was determined by traffic surveys on
Churchill Park Drive. On a typical Saturday, the maximum parking accumulation within the site is
around 428 vehicles (at 12.00 pm). Parking accumulation is over 380 for 3 hours between 10.00
am and 1.00 pm. The ideal parking supply was calculated at 500 spaces, based on the following
formula: peak demand = 85% of total supply. Accounting for 10 years growth at 1.0% pa., the
minimum parking supply is 550 car parking spaces. It is noted that the existing car park located
at the mid-western side of the site will be retained until all new staged car parking works are
complete so as to ensure that parking demand for ongoing use of the site is met in the interim.
The type of vehicles accessing the site are expected to be typical family vehicles.
(f) the nature of traffic in the surrounding area. The subject site is at the end of Churchill Park Drive
and traffic in this location is either to or from Churchill Park Sports Grounds (the subject site).
(g) the provisions of Australian Standards AS2890.1 - Parking Facilities, Part 1: Off Road Car
Parking and AS2890.2 Parking Facilities, Part 2: Parking facilities - Off-street commercial vehicle
facilities. The design of the proposed parking area is consistent with provisions of AS2890.1.
AS2890.2 does not apply, being for commercial vehicle facilities, which are not required for the
proposed development.
32/18251/23007 4

3766772
Version: 2,
27/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Clause E6.6.3
E6.6.3 Pedestrian Access
Objective - To ensure pedestrian access is provided in a safe and convenient manner.
Consistent
A1.1 P1
Uses that require 10 or more parking spaces must: Safe pedestrian access must be provided
(a) have a 1m wide footpath that is separated from the within car parks, having regard to:
access ways or parking aisles, except where crossing (a) the characteristics of the site;
access ways or parking aisles, by: (b) the nature of the use;
(i) a horizontal distance of 2.5m between the edge of (c) the number of parking spaces;
the footpath and the access way or parking aisle; or
(d) the frequency of vehicle movements;
(ii) protective devices such as bollards, guard rails or
(e) the needs of persons with a disability;
planters between the footpath and the access way or
(f) the location and number of footpath
parking aisle; and
crossings;
(b) be signed and line marked at points where pedestrians
cross access ways or parking aisles; and (g) vehicle and pedestrian traffic safety;
(h) the location of any access ways or
A1.2
parking aisles; and
In parking areas containing accessible car parking spaces (i) any protective devices proposed for
for use by persons with a disability, a footpath having a pedestrian safety.
minimum width of 1.5m and a gradient not exceeding 1 in
14 is required from those spaces to the main entry point to
the building.
Complies with P1
Safe pedestrian access will be provided with the proposed and upgraded car park and pathways,
having regard to:
(a) the characteristics of the site. Vehicle access will be concentrated in the general access area at
the southern end of the subject site, which will improve separation between pedestrians and
vehicles. Pedestrian-only access will be available at the south-eastern side of the site via a
pathway that will be located north of the proposed parking area and access road.
(b) the nature of the use. The primary use of the site is for recreation. The concentration of parking
facilities to the south-eastern section of the site will improve separation of pedestrians and
vehicular traffic.
(c) the number of parking spaces. A total of 550 car parking spaces will be provided in 3 stages to
meet eventual demand following construction of the new sports fields.
(d) the frequency of vehicle movements. A survey of uses associated with the site on a typical
Saturday suggest that traffic movements coincide with the scheduling of games ranging from 8
am to late afternoon. The agglomeration of vehicle parking in the southern sector of the site, and
improvements in terms of formalising site ingress and egress achieves greater safety for all
pedestrians.
(e) the needs of persons with a disability. Ten accessible parking spaces will be provided at the
northern most section of the Stage 1 parking area, closest to the recreational facilities and
internal pathways.
32/18251/23007 5

3766772
Version: 2,
27/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
(f) the location and number of footpath crossings. No footpath crossings of the access road are
proposed. Pathways to the north and west of the Stage 1 parking area will provide for pedestrian
access around the parking area and into and out of the site proper.
(g) vehicle and pedestrian traffic safety. Formalising access and parking achieving greater
separation between vehicle and pedestrian movement will increase safety by achieving formal
separation and more obvious use delineation.
(h) the location of any access ways or parking aisles. The proposed access arrangements and
clearer delineation of site function is achieved with the new car parking layout which adds
significantly to the relative safety of site users. .
(i) any protective devices proposed for pedestrian safety. The separation of pedestrian access from
the vehicle traffic areas adds to site safety and vehicle management.
Clause E6.6.5
E6.6.5 Bicycle facilities
Objective: To ensure that cyclists are provided with adequate facilities.
Consistent
Bicycle hoops will be provided within the site immediately adjacent sports fields to satisfy the nature of
the facilities’ use.
A1 P1
Uses that require 5 or more Shower and change room facilities must be provided at adequate
bicycle spaces by Table E6.1 level to cater for the reasonable needs of cyclists, having regard to:
must provide 1 shower and (a) the location of the proposed use;
change room facility on site, with
(b) the existing network of cycle paths and bicycle lanes and other
one additional shower and
means of access to the site for cyclists;
change room on site for each 10
(c) the nature of the proposed use;
additional bicycles spaces
required. (d) the number of employees;
(e) the users of the site and the likelihood of travel by bicycle;
(f) whether there are facilities on the site for other reasons that
could be used by cyclists; and
(g) the opportunity for sharing bicycle facilities on nearby sites.
Complies with P1
Given the nature of the use as a sports recreation facility, it is considered that there are adequate
facilities available to cyclists using the facility.
32/18251/23007 6

3766772
Version: 2,
27/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
Clause E6.6.6
E6.6.6 Bicycle parking and storage facilities
Objective: To ensure that parking and storage facilities for bicycles are safe, secure and convenient.
Consistent
Parking facilities proposed for cyclists will be safe and convenient. Given the nature of the use,
storage facilities are not considered necessary.
A1 P1
Bicycle parking and storage facilities for Bicycle parking and storage facilities must be provided in a
uses that require 5 or more bicycle safe, secure and convenient location, having regard to:
spaces by Table E6.1 must: (a) the accessibility to the site;
(a) be accessible from a road, cycle (b) the characteristics of the site;
path, bicycle lane, shared path or
(c) the nature of the proposed use;
access way;
(d) the number of employees;
(b) be located within 50m from the main
(e) the users of the site and the likelihood of travel by
entrance;
bicycle;
(c) be visible from the main entrance or
(f) the location and visibility of proposed parking storage
otherwise signed; and
facilities for bicycles;
(d) be available and adequately lit during
the times they will be used, in (g) the nature of the bicycle parking and storage facilities;
accordance with Table 2.3 of AS/NZS (h) whether there are other parking and storage facilities
1158.3.1: 2005 Lighting for roads and on the site; and
public spaces - Pedestrian area (i) the opportunity for sharing bicycle parking and storage
(Category P) lighting - Performance and facilities on nearby sites.
design requirements.
Complies with P1
Bicycle parking facilities will be located at the northern end of the central pedestrian/cycle access path
within the main centre. The frequency of use does not necessitate storage facilities.
32/18251/23007 7

3766772
Version: 2,
27/03/2018
PLANNING EXHIBITED
DOCUMENTS
Ref. No: DA 0098/2018
Date
A2 P2
Bicycle parking spaces must: Bicycle parking spaces and access must be
(a) have minimum dimensions of: convenient, safe and efficient to use, having
regard to:
(i) 1.7m in length; and
(a) the characteristics of the site;
(ii) 1.2m in height; and
(b) the space available;
(iii) 0.7m in width at the handlebars;
(c) the safety of cyclists;
(b) have unobstructed access with a width of at least
2m and a gradient of no more 5% from a road, cycle (d) the proposed measures to secure
path, bicycle lane, shared path or access way; and bicycles; and
(c) include a rail or hoop to lock a bicycle to that (e) the provisions of AS 2890.3 1993 Parking
meets AS 2890.3 1993 Parking facilities - Bicycle facilities - Bicycle parking facilities.
parking facilities.
Complies with A2
Bicycle spaces will be located within an area (200m 2) with each space meeting the minimum
dimensions. The space provides unobstructed access, at a gradient less than 5% from the shared
access way. Bicycle parking hoops will be placed within an area measuring 10 metres wide x 20
metres in length, providing space for approximately 50 bicycles in accordance with AS2890.3.
I trust that the information provided adequately addresses the RFI.
Regards
John Ayers
Technical Director Planning
GHD
Proudly employee owned
T: 03 6332 5508 | V: 325508 | M: 0408 123 770 | E: john.ayers@ghd.com
23 Paterson Street Launceston TAS 7250 Australia | www.ghd.com
WATER | ENERGY & RESOURCES | ENVIRONMENT | PROPERTY & BUILDINGS | TRANSPORTATION
Attachments:
A – Titles
B – Drawings
32/18251/23007 8

3766772
Version: 2,
27/03/2018

Churchill Park Master Plan

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Churchill Park Master Plan

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

PLANNING EXHIBITED

FORMALISED SITE ACCESS

EXISTING HARDSTAND &

EXISTING PATH TO PROPOSED STAGE 1

RETAIN EXISTING FENCE

BUS / TAXI LAYBY

SW NEW GRAVEL CARPARK

RETAIN EXIST. OPEN SW

DRAIN & STORMWATER EXISTING SPRAY SEALED

UPGRADE EXISTING SPRAY

CHURCHILL PARK CONCEPT MASTER PLAN STAGE 1 INDICATIVE CARPARK LAYOU

Document Set ID: 3816080

NEW GRAVEL CARPARK

CHURCHILL PARK CONCEPT MASTER PLAN SCALE 1:500 AT ORIGINAL SIZE

STAGES 2 & 3 INDICATIVE CARPARK LAYOUT

Document Set ID: 3816080

Launceston City Council

Document Set ID: 3816080

2. Site and Surrounds ........................................................................................................................ 2

3. Project Background ........................................................................................................................ 7

Table 5-1 Use classes ............................................................................................................................ 12

Figure 2-4 Site photographs ..................................................................................................................... 6

Figure 4-1 Churchill Park Concept Master Plan ..................................................................................... 10

Figure 5-2 Precinct Map ......................................................................................................................... 20

1.2 Report Structure

1.3 Accompanying Documents

1.4 Scope and Limitations

Document Set ID: 3816080

2. Site and Surrounds

Figure 2-1 Subject site

2.1.2 Title Information

Title Property Ownership

Document Set ID: 3816080

Figure 2-2 CT 154196/1 Showing area of sportsground (green) on north

Document Set ID: 3816080

Figure 2-3 CT 50435/1 Showing area of sportsground (green) on south eastern

Document Set ID: 3816080

2.1.3 Site Description

Document Set ID: 3816080

Figure 2-4 Site photographs

2.2 Surrounding Area

Document Set ID: 3816080

 Formalise site parking and access in designated areas;

3.2 Community Engagement

3.2.1 Public Notification

Document Set ID: 3816080

 A second cricket pitch between soccer field 2 and 3;

 Consolidating site fencing to a single perimeter fence;

 Existing landscaping enhanced as appropriate and new areas developed in accordance

 New pedestrian and cycle paths developed;

Document Set ID: 3816080

4.2 Proposd Staged program

STAGE 1 (funding committed) will include:

STAGE 2 will include:

Document Set ID: 3816080

Figure 4-1 Churchill Park Concept Master Plan

Document Set ID: 3816080

Figure 5-1 Zoning map

5.2 Use Categorisation

Document Set ID: 3816080

Use Definition Status

5.3 Recreation Zone

5.3.1 Zone Purpose