RESULT AND DISCUSSION

Scope
• Hazard in work activity
• Hazards based on risk rating
• Rationalization of Hazards
• Safety and Health risk effect to the organisation.
Hazard in work activity
Safety Hazard Health Hazard
• Fragile cutting disk, • Fume in welding area
• Sharp object on the • Static work
floor, • Bright light
• Pinch Point • Noise
• Heavy Object • Dust
• Exposed electric cable
• Hot surface
Hazards based on risk rating
No. Type Hazard Likelihood Severity Risk
1 Safety Hazard Fragile cutting disk 4 4 16
Fume in welding
2 Health Hazard area 4 4 16

3 Safety Hazard Sharp object 3 3 9

4 Safety Hazard Heavy object 3 3 9

Exposed electrical
5 Safety Hazard cable 3 3 9

6 Health Hazard Static work 3 3 9

7 Safety Hazard Hot surface 3 3 9

8 Safety Hazard Pinch point 2 3 6

9 Health Hazard Dust 2 2 4

10 Health Hazard Bright light 1 3 3

11 Health Hazard Noise 2 2 4

Rationalization of Hazards
HAZARD

Duration Frequency 1.Number of

Record of
of of Consequence workers exposed
occurrence 2.Hazard degree
Exposure Exposure

Existing Risk
Likelihood Severity
Control

Risk Rating
Rationalization of Safety Hazards
Hazard Identification Risk Analysis Risk Control

No. Work Activity Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control Likelihood Severity Risk Recommended Control Measure PIC(Due Date/Status)
Grinding Training,
Refresher course, Tool
Box Meeting, Wear
Welding work face Shield Signage and
in the Supervision
Fragile Face Shield and Leather
workshop Cotton Hand Hand Glove
cutting
disk Punchered glove 4 4 16 Change to high Quality
cutting disk Ali(17 August 2018/Done,

• Existing risk control does not able to • Existing risk control does not able to
reduce the severity of injury ( Cotton
reduce the probability of injury ( Cotton
hand glove)
hand glove) • The severity of the effect shows that this
• Record shows the cutting disk had broken incident will cause fatality.
while in operation 3 month ago. • Number of worker working on one station
• Duration and frequency shows that this is only one worker
activities is being carried out within 6 • The degree of hazard is high due to the
hours per day. nature of the cutting disk quality (Low
quality – fragile)
Rationalization of Hazards-Fume in welding
area Hazard Identification Risk Analysis Risk Control

No. Work Activity Hazard Effect Existing Risk Control Likelihood Severity Risk Recommended Control Measure PIC(Due Date/Status)

Suction Fan
Signage on usage
Welding work in
Fume in of suction fan
the workshop
welding Respiratory Leather Glove Ali(17 August
area discomfort Dust mask 4 4 16 and Face mask 2018/Done,

• Existing risk control does not able to reduce

• Existing risk control does not able to
the severity of injury ( Dust mask)
reduce the probability of fume exposure (
• The severity of the effect shows that this
Dust mask)
incident will cause fatality.(Cancer for long
• Record shows that there is a sick leave
term exposure)
due to fume exposure in operation 3
• Number of worker working on one station is
month ago.
only one worker
• Duration and frequency shows that this
• The degree of hazard is high due to the nature
activities is being carried out within 6
of the work environment (Stagnant air in the
hours per day.
work area) cutting disk quality
Safety and Health risk effect to the
organisation.
Safety, Health and Environment
• Persons in the affected area
• Personnel responding to the incident
• Pollution to the environment

Legal
• Regulatory and contractual obligations

Business
• Continuity of operations and delivery of services
• Property, facilities, and infrastructure loss
• Reputation of the organization
• Economic and financial condition