Sie sind auf Seite 1von 12

Helping low - level learners

use bottom-up processing


strategies to understand
reading texts
Language Systems Assessment 3

31-Aug-13
Distance Delta
Kateryna Kirichenko
Table of Contents
Introduction 153 ........................................................................................................................................... 2
Analysis ......................................................................................................................................................... 3
Reading and theories ................................................................................................................................ 3
Bottom-up strategies ................................................................................................................................ 4
Problems and solutions................................................................................................................................. 7
Problem One Associating letter with sounds............................................................................................ 7
Solution One ............................................................................................................................................. 7
Problem Two Morphology (word formation – parts of speech)............................................................... 7
Solution Two ............................................................................................................................................. 7
Problem Three Lack of Vocabulary ........................................................................................................... 8
Solutions Three ......................................................................................................................................... 8
Problem Four Understanding cohesive devices (conjunctions)................................................................ 9
Solution Four:............................................................................................................................................ 9
Problem five Understanding referential pronouns................................................................................... 9
Solution Five............................................................................................................................................ 10
Bibliography ................................................................................................................................................ 10

Hi Jon,

I'm uploading the draft for the BE and the lesson plan (in one document). This is somehow the
most difficult LSA BE for me up to now. I was struggling to identify the actual skills (when I did
writing there was a list of them in DELTA materials) as there are way too many and then
identifying which ones are bottom-up only. I understand that they are in constant interplay
with too-down, but I don’t see how I could do both and for my learners bottom-up are more
important in my opinion. And I’ve already exceeded word limit in my analysis…

So, I will be relying heavily on your feedback as I am not exactly sure if I'm going in a right
direction.

Thank you!

Katya
Introduction 153
Having learned English myself, I believe that reading is one of the key parts of language learning. My
teaching experience has shown that students who read often make faster progress learning the
language.

After reading about different theories reading I have decided to focus on bottom-up skills in this essay.
While I believe that interactive model is the most comprehensive, I also believe that bottom –up skills
deserve more attention. Especially for learners whose native language has a different script (Japanese,
Chinese, Arabic, etc.). At the moment I teach Arabic learners and a lot of them struggle with reading
simply because they lack low-level skills. This also affects their writing skills and becomes an obstacle
when it comes to exams and/or further academic study.

Analysis

Reading and theories


Defining reading isn’t easy. It is a complex process. While it is often referred to as a “receptive skill” it
isn’t passive - while reading, people ‘interact’ with the text, they bring their own knowledge and
experience to the text in order to interpret and understand it. So it is an active, even interactive process.

W. Grabe gives the following characteristics of reading process:

 Reading is rapid – the readers need to read at a certain speed to be able to make connections
and process the data.
 Reading is purposeful – the readers have a reason to read. This gives them a motivation to read.
The purpose also defines the skills and strategies needed to fulfil the purpose of reading.
 Reading is interactive – the readers apply their own knowledge to the information in the text to
make sense of it. Also different kinds of skills (lower and higher level) work together and to help
the reader.
 Reading is comprehensive – the reader expects to understand the text.
 Reading is flexible – the readers employ many different skills and strategies, they go back in the
text to when needed, they predict what will happen next.
 Reading develops gradually – nobody becomes a fluent reader instantaneously. It is a result of a
long term effort.
(Grabe, 1991)

In their attempts to model the reading process the researchers have developed three main models:

1. Bottom-up – this model was the earliest and was mainly developed by P.B. Gough. It is used to
describe how the readers decode the letters ad words and use their lexical and grammatical
knowledge to understand it. (Hedge, 2000). The popular phonics teaching method is associated
with bottom-up approach and many believe that bottom-up strategies are only about decoding
letters or words. However, in my opinion, there is much more to it. As S. Silberstein wrote:
‘bottom-up reading requires language processing at all level: word, sentence, and discourse’
(Silberstein, 1994, p. 7).
2. Top-down – this model is usually associated with K.S Goodman and F. Smith. In top-down
approach the readers use their prior knowledge to understand the text.
3. Interactive - this model combines both the bottom-up and top-down approaches. According to
its proponents (Stanovich, Rumelhart, etc.) successful readers use both sets of skills while
reading.

Bottom-up strategies
‘Good readers recognise and decode quickly and accurately, words, grammatical structures, and other
linguistic features’.

(Hedge, 2000, p. 92)

A lot have been written on reading processes but it seems that top-down reading processes are often
seen as more important (even when discussing the interactive model) and bottom-up (which is often
referred to as ‘mechanical’ or ‘traditional’) gets a lot less attention. When researching for this paper I
had difficulties finding literature that focused on bottom -up until I found B. Birch’s book ‘English L2
Reading: Getting to the bottom’ (2006). She argues that bottom up processing has been ‘virtually
ignored’ (Birch, 2002) and emphasises the importance of lower level skills for becoming a proficient
reader. One of the popular reading teaching methods associated with bottom-up processes is phonics,
which describes the relationship between the written letter and spoken sounds represented by them.
While it has received a lot of criticism by the proponents of the ‘whole language’ approach, it has been
successfully used to teach children (and adult L2 learners) to read.

According to Grabe’s taxonomy of reading skills there are 6 different categories:

• automatic recognition skills

• vocabulary & structural knowledge

• formal discourse structure knowledge

• content/word background knowledge

• synthesis & evaluation skills

• metacognitive knowledge & skills monitoring

(Grabe, 1991)

For the purposes of this essay I will be focussing on the first three as they are associated with bottom-up
model concentrating on the skills low-level learners use when reading. As Ulijin and Salager-Meyer
(1998) note in their studies that helping students of low L2 proficiency to improve their word-
identification skill is a more important goal than helping them to develop problem-solving skills such as
using context to figure out interpretations, intentions and conclusions

Automatic recognition skills


Eye movement:

Efficient readers move their eyes left to right (in English), following the text. However, they do not move
continuously in one line, but rather jump between the words/chunks of words. These jumps are called
fixations. Good readers have fewer fixations, taking in a few words at a time by chunking the words into
sense groups. (Nuttal, 1996).For example the sentence My old cat always sleeps in the afternoon will be
processed in following chunks: My old cat / always sleeps / in the afternoon.

As we can see, the good readers do not pause to consider the meaning of individual words which
increases the speed and the understanding of the text.

Phonemes:

develop efficient grapheme-to-phoneme knowledge (Birch p. 101).

Morphemes:

Morphemes are the smallest units of language that contain meaning. The word bat makes sense in itself,
but the addition of s makes bats either a plural noun, (bats have been at the mulberry tree) or a present
tense verb with a singular subject (he bats left–handed). In the word unhelpful, the prefix un changes the
meaning of helpful to its opposite.

Expert English readers store common morphemes with their phonological representations and can read
them efficiently. Birch p. 114

p. 108 Birch, in reading p. 114

Bound (inflectional) and free

vocabulary & structural knowledge


Fluent readers have a wide range of receptive vocabulary and knowledge of syntax that help them
understand the text.

Birch p. 128

using morphological cues – grammar

inferring meaning from context – vocabulary


complex sentences (coordination and subordination) – syntax

Some studies suggest that lexical knowledge is the basis of reading comprehension (Sandy Urquhart and
Cyril Weir, 1998). Other studies suggest that lexical knowledge must also be supported by syntactic
knowledge (Nuttal, 1996).

Sustaining the ambiguity of authentic reading – not even native speakers know every word in their
language. Efficient readers understand know which words they need to know to extract the meaning
from a text. (Silberstein, 1994). For example, when reading about sea animals in an encyclopaedia, one
doesn’t need to be familiar with all species to understand the gist of the article.

formal discourse structure knowledge


Recognising discourse signals – understanding discourse signals is extremely important for efficient
reading.

Table 16.1. Types of Discourse Markers (Mackay, 1987, p.254) can I insert it as an appendix?

Notional category/meaning Marker


first(ly), second(ly), third(ly), one, two, three / a,
1. Enumerative
b, c, next, then, finally, last(ly), in the first /
Introduce in order in which points are to be
second place, for one thing / for another thing,
made or the time sequence in which actions or
to begin with, subsequently, eventually, finally,
processes took place.
in the end, to conclude
2. Additive
2.1 Reinforcing. Introduces a reinforcement or again, then again, also, moreover, furthermore,
confirmation of what has preceded. in addition, above all, what is more equally,
2.2 Similarity. Introduces a statement of likewise, similarly, correspondingly, in the same
similarity with what has preceded. way
2.3 Transition. Introduces a new stage in the now, well incidentally, by the way. O.K., fine
sequence of presentation of information.
3. Logical Sequence
3.1 Summative. Introduces a summary of what so, so far, altogether, overall, then, thus,
has preceded. therefore, in short, to sum up, to conclude, to
3.2 Resultative summarize so, as a result, consequently, hence,
Introduces an expression of the result or now, therefore, thus, as a consequence, in
consequence of what preceded (and includes consequence
inductive and deductive acts).
4. Explicative
namely, in other words, that is to say, better,
Introduces an explanation or reformulation of
rather, by (this) we mean
what preceded.
5. Illustrative
Introduces an illustration or example of what for example, for instance
preceded.
6. Contrastive alternatively, (or) again, (or) rather, (but)
6.1 Replacive. Introduces an alternative to what then, on the other hand
preceded. conversely, instead, then, on the contrary, by
6.2 Antithetic. Introduces information in contrast, on the other hand
opposition to what preceded. anyway, anyhow, however, nevertheless,
6.3 Concessive. Introduces information which is nonetheless, notwithstanding, still, though,
unexpected in view of what preceded. yet, for all that, in spite of (that), at the same
time, all the same
McKay, R., 1987. Teaching the information gathering skills. In Long and Richards 1987.

Problems and solutions

Problem One Associating letter with sounds


A lot of English learners have difficulties understanding how letters/combinations of letters form
sounds. Arabic learners have difficulties differentiating between vowel sounds such as /æ/, /ʌ/ and /e/
or /i:/ and /ɪ/; and some consonants such as /p/ and /b/ or /g/ and /ʤ/. Often when they read a word
they don’t associate it’s written form with its pronunciation and need to ask for it (Some students asked
me what gym /gɪm/ was and when I said gym /ʤɪm/? They all said that they know the meaning.

Solution One
Phonics

minimal pairs – pronunciation journey from Pronunciation Games supplementary book

introduce phonemic chart???

Problem Two Morphology (word formation – parts of speech)


Lower level students of all nationalities (from my experience) have difficulties differentiating between
parts of speech. Questions like ‘What’s

Solution Two
Aim: to raise awareness of word formation by using monolingual dictionaries.

Procedure:

1. Display a word your students most likely don’t know, such as ‘dehydration’. Ask the students to look it
up in a dictionary.

2. Ask them to look for other words they are familiar with and see what other parts of the speech there
are that stem from the same root. Discuss how some words are made (affixation)

Evaluation: A lot of students at lower levels will benefit from an activity like this. Using a dictionary is an
important skill and it needs to be introduced in class to help students use it independently
Adapted from S. Silberstein ( 1994)

Problem Three Lack of Vocabulary


Lack of vocabulary is probably the biggest and the most common spread problem when reading. For
lower level students it is probably the biggest problem as not knowing the meaning of words can make
reading a frustrating experience. At beginner and elementary levels most students don’t have a large
vocabulary of automatically recognised items. It has been suggested that moderate L1 readers can
recognise about fifty thousand words. However, most foreign language syllabuses present only a few
hundred words a year. (Nuttal, 1996). There are also complex words, idioms and phrasal verbs that are
difficult to understand.

Solutions Three
While acquiring vocabulary is an obvious answer to this problem, it takes time.Moreover, nobody will
ever know all the words in a language. Even if it’s L1. But to help students improve their reading there
are certain reading techniques that will help students become better readers even if their vocabulary
range is limited.

Aim: to raise students awareness of essential and throwaway words (words that are not necessary to
understanding) to cope with unfamiliar words in texts.

Procedure:

1. Prepare a few slips of paper with sentences each containing one difficult word. In some the words are
essential and in some they are throwaway.

2. Working in groups students decide which ones they need to look up in a dictionary and which ones
they don’t need to get the gist of the sentence.

3. Discuss as a group.

Adapted from Nuttal (1996)

Example sentences:

 His stylus broke so he couldn’t write anymore. The main idea of the sentence is that he couldn’t
write anymore. Stylus in this sentence is not essential and doesn’t require translation.
 She declined my offer to help. Decline in this sentence is essential and needs to be researched.

Evaluation: By doing this activity students learn to understand that translating every word is not
necessary and often impedes the understanding of the general idea of the text. It helps them to validate
not having to look up every word.
Problem Four Understanding cohesive devices (conjunctions)
For most beginner and elementary students conjunctions are a grey area. From my experience, beginner
students do not see the difference between and and but. As a result they often have difficulties with
reading comprehension.

Solution Four:

Aim:

Help readers understand the meaning of text by using discourse markers to identify the relationship the
writer intends between two parts of the text. If the reader understands one part of the text, the
discourse marker can be a key to the other part.

Procedure:

1. Introduce the students to the functional groups of conjunctions (additive, contrast, etc).

2. Ask the students to read a text with highlighted conjunctions and discuss how they indicate the
relationships between the parts of the sentences/words.

3. Give a gapped text with a list of conjunctions. Students fill in the gaps.

4. Once students have finished, discuss the choices students made and what differences in meaning
would occur with different choices made. This discussion part provides the real value in the activity.

5. Once students are familiar with discourse markers give them a text with the first part of the sentence
and a conjunction. Give two choices of finishing the sentence. Students need to look at a conjunction
decide which one would be more appropriate. Discuss their choices. Point out that sometimes one of
the alternatives is easily ruled out when the context and marker are considered together. They should
begin to see that discourse markers can help make sense of a difficult text.

Adapted from Mackay, R., Teaching the Information Gathering Skills, in Long and Richards (1987)
Methododology in TESOL: A Book of Readings, p. 254)

Evaluation: in this activity students learn to pay attention to conjuncts and their importance in
understanding the text.

Problem five Understanding referential pronouns


Lower level students often have difficulties understanding the relationships between parts of the text
marked by referential pronouns. When giving doing comprehension tests they often give wrong answers
simply because they don’t pay attention to them. Arab learners have difficulties in this area because
Arabic verb forms incorporate personal pronouns as suffixes. Japanese students face a similar problem –
their verbs can stand on their own which can lead to Japanese students omitting all pronouns. (Michael
Swan and Bernard Smith, 2001). J
Solution Five
Aim: to highlight the relationships referential pronouns represent in a text

Procedure:

1. Give students a short paragraph with personal pronouns. Ask them to find and underline the
pronouns. If possible have the text on IWB or OHP for the discussions.

2. Using different colours highlighters highlight the pronoun and its corresponding noun in the text. Ask
them if seeing the relationship helps them understand the text better. Discuss.

3. Give a longer text with a few paragraphs and comprehension questions to answer which students
need to see the connections marked by referential pronouns. Ask the students to answer the questions
individually. Then they work in small groups discussing how they found the answers and again
highlighting the nouns/concepts and their corresponding pronouns.

Evaluation: This activity is very simple, but at the same time it helps the students to see the
relationships between words, sentences and even paragraphs. If done regularly, it can increase reading
comprehension by becoming automatic.

Bibliography
Birch, B. (2002). English L2 Reading: Getting to the bottom. LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES,
PUBLISHERS.

Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly , 375-
406.

Grellet, F. (1981). Developing Reading Skills. CUP.

Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. OUP.

Michael Swan and Bernard Smith. (2001). Learner English . CUP.

Nuttal, C. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills in a foreign language. Macmillan Heinemann.

Sandy Urquhart and Cyril Weir. (1998). Reading in a Second Language: Process, Product and Practice.
Longman.

Silberstein, S. (1994). teachniques and resources in teaching reading. OUP.

Lesson plan
I will do all the other things, like rationale, class and individual profile and others. It’s just that today
it will be my 2nd lesson with the class so I need a bit more information about them.

Elementary 3 group, follow New Cutting Edge book units 11-15.

16 students, 19 to 48 years old.

Most work, some are students and a couple are unemployed but looking for a job. About 8 said that
they will/might take and IELTS in the future or study abroad.

Lesson aim: to help students better understand the text by recognising the relationships between parts
of the text marked by referential (anaphoric) pronouns.

Lesson outline:

Test-Teach-Test?

1. Give the students a text and a list of comprehension questions. Set a time limit (10 min). They need
to answer the questions. 10 min

2. Go through the questions and see if they were correct. 5-10 min

3. Give the slips of paper with different sentences with pronouns in them. Distribute different colour
highlights. Ask the students to highlight pronouns and words they refer to in the same colour. Discuss
the relationships. 10 min

4. Do the same with the text they read in the first part. Ask if it is clearer when they see the
relationships between the sentences/ideas 5-10 min

5. Repeat part 1 and see the result (should be faster and more accurate.) 10 min

6. Discuss 5 min

OR
Lesson aim: to help learners understand the meaning of text by using discourse signals (linkers) to
identify the relationship between parts of the text.

Lesson procedure:

1. Display various linkers on the board. Elicit what they do in a text. 5 min

2. If needed explain the meaning of some of them – 5 - 10 min.

2. Ask the students to put the linkers into right category according to their functions – contrast, addition,
etc. 10 min
3. Give a reading passage with omitted linkers and ask the students to answer some comprehension
questions. 10 min

4. Students work in pairs and fill in the gaps. Ask them if it is easier to read it with the linkers. 10 min

4. In groups, students compare their results and discuss the choices they’ve made. 10 min.

Do I have to do ACTUAL reading in the lesson? I know when I did writing it was essential that the
students actually produced some writing. Is it the same for reading?

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen