Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1/18 Tags
Posted January 24, 2018 Apple Climate Change Climate Science
Update: New Book added: Win Bigly – By Scott Adams Clinton Clinton2016 CNN
persuasion, it is because I am a trained hypnotist, and mention that skill See More +
often in the context of blogging and Periscoping. I have also studied the
various tools of persuasion for years because they are helpful in my job
as a writer. In my New York Times best selling book Win Bigly I teach you
President Trump’s world-class persuasion techniques that you can use
for your work or personal life.
How to Fail at Almost Everything and Still Win Big: Kind of the Story of
My Life – by Scott Adams
Win Bigly – By Scott adams (Persuasion Tips based on the 2016 election)
http://blog.dilbert.com/2018/01/24/persuasion-reading-list-updated-1-18/ Page 1 of 10
Persuasion Reading List - Updated 1/18 - Dilbert Blog 6/2/18, 7:29 PM
Note: I removed several books from earlier versions of the list to give it
some focus. I also removed the books about hypnosis because you can’t
effectively learn that sort of skill from books.
" # $ % &
http://blog.dilbert.com/2018/01/24/persuasion-reading-list-updated-1-18/ Page 2 of 10
Persuasion Reading List - Updated 1/18 - Dilbert Blog 6/2/18, 7:29 PM
' (
Older Post Newer Post
Sort by Best
$ Recommend 73 ⤤ Share
Todayistheday • 4 months ago
30 △ ▽ • Share ›
17 △ ▽ • Share ›
And accomplishments.
2△ ▽ • Share ›
http://blog.dilbert.com/2018/01/24/persuasion-reading-list-updated-1-18/ Page 4 of 10
Persuasion Reading List - Updated 1/18 - Dilbert Blog 6/2/18, 7:29 PM
https://www.theonion.com/a-...
2△ ▽ • Share ›
http://blog.dilbert.com/2018/01/24/persuasion-reading-list-updated-1-18/ Page 5 of 10
Persuasion Reading List - Updated 1/18 - Dilbert Blog 6/2/18, 7:29 PM
When your entire argument rests on the assumption that you can
read someone's mind....you might be a liberal.
△ ▽ • Share ›
http://articles.chicagotrib...
△ ▽ • Share ›
△ ▽ • Share ›
The Republican memo is not 'inaccurate', as Jake Tapper is purporting on CNN now,
lying sack of shit Jake is!
9△ ▽ • Share ›
You might be younger than I and have more tolerance, but I stopped watching
and it's like cutting off the major source of negativity in your life.
1△ ▽ • Share ›
Kind of strange that you are so obsessed over this. Who cares?
Like many following Scott, i started out much more interested in his
theories of persuasion and how Trump was using them than in
trump himself.
4△ ▽ • Share ›
He spends the first part of chapter one discussing lobsters as a species around many
millions of years before dinosaurs. He concludes the section with this:
“Back to the fractious shellfish; it doesn’t take that long before lobsters, testing each
other out, learn who can be messed with and who should be given a wide berth – and
once they have learned, the resultant hierarchy is exceedingly stable (think “very stable
genius”). All a victor needs to do, once he has won, is to wiggle his antennae in a
threatening manner, and a previous opponent will vanish in a puff of sand before him
(think 16 primary opponents, think Schumer, think FISA memo...). A weaker lobster will
quit trying, accept his lowly status, and keep his legs attached to his body. The top
lobster, by contrast – occupying the best shelter, getting some good rest, finishing a
good meal (big steaks as well as Big Macs) – parades his dominance around his territory
(SOTU guests, please stand up!), rousting subordinate lobsters from their shelters at
night (tweet tweet), just to remind them who’s their daddy.” (Winning!!!)
9△ ▽ • Share ›
Save that Peterson is woefully ignorant of the basic biology he tries to base his
book on. He makes such fundamental errors as claiming arthropods (lobsters)
and chordates (humans) diverged 350 million years ago. These two had already
diverged by the Cambrian, some 550 million years ago. Estimates based on
molecular divergence put the date they split ~800 million years ago.
see more
1△ ▽ • Share ›
As far as analogies, you are correct, the human brain does learn new
information largely by analogy. However, and again to be fair, Scott Adams
never said this wasn't true anywhere I've ever seen. What he said was that
analogies are generally bad for persuasion when conversing with
someone because often using one just steers the conversation off course
and the discussion becomes about the analogy and/or it's accuracy as an
analogy for the original topic.
To Scott's credit, both of the last two times I've tried to use an analogy on
this blog that exact thing has happened (one discussing the new tax laws
with Spaceman and a few others, the other discussing net neutrality with
Michael). Also, even in your post here you are sort of doing exactly that to
JPs analogy with lobsters, discrediting his argument by attacking the
accuracy of statements made in his analogy.
3△ ▽ • Share ›
http://blog.dilbert.com/2018/01/24/persuasion-reading-list-updated-1-18/ Page 9 of 10
Persuasion Reading List - Updated 1/18 - Dilbert Blog 6/2/18, 7:29 PM
Dilbert © 2018, Andrews McMeel Syndication | Comics Blog Search About Scott Adams Contact
http://blog.dilbert.com/2018/01/24/persuasion-reading-list-updated-1-18/ Page 10 of 10