Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Work
Home Products How It Works Design Help Gallery Contact FAQ
Online Store
Jump to: Location in Page
A louver is a ventilation product that allows air to pass through it while keeping out
unwanted elements such as water, dirt, and debris. A number of fixed or operable blades
mounted in a frame can provide this functionality. The basic considerations for selecting
louvers are Louver Free Area, Water Penetration, and Resistance to Airflow (Pressure Loss).
Once these concepts are understood, they can be used to properly apply a louver.
Free area is derived by taking the total open area of a louver (after subtracting all
obstructions - blades and frame) and dividing by the overall wall opening. This gives a
comparison of a louvered opening to an unobstructed opening. Common louver free areas
range from 35% to 60% of the wall opening (65% to 40% obstructed). A high percentage
free area is beneficial because more air can enter into a smaller wall opening, reducing the
cost of the wall opening and louver.
Obviously some obstruction is required in order to keep undesirable water out. A fully
obstructed opening would allow no water in, while a totally unobstructed opening would
allow water to enter unimpeded. A properly designed louver will maximize free area while
allowing a minimal amount of water to enter.
For more information about free area, please visit the linked page Louver Free Area.
First Point of Water Penetration is the point at which a louver allows the passage of water
through the louver. It is a threshold measurement of air intake velocity at which the louver
will begin leaking (in feet per minute or fpm).
Traditional Louvers:
Jump to: Location in Page
The typical method of testing for water penetration is to intake air through the louver while
applying a measured water content into the airstream. The velocity of airflow through the
louver free area is increased until the louver allows water to enter. The result of this test is
the first point of water penetration - ranging from 300 fpm (a very poor resistor to water
entrainment) to 1250 fpm (a very good resistor to water entrainment).
Testing is done similar to traditional louvers, but with wind simultaneously applied to the
face of the louver. The wind is applied at a fixed rate, while the air intake velocity is
increased from 0 feet per minute to a predetermined value. Instead of a "first point of water
penetration" value, efficiency of the louver is measured instead. Basically, "how good is the
louver at stopping the water?" The efficiency is rated as a percentage, determined from the
amount of water that passes through the louver divided by the total water applied during
the test. A very efficient louver will have a value from 99-100%. Inefficient louvers will have
values below 85%, meaning they allow over 15% of the water applied to pass through the
louver.
Testing procedures have fixed values for water volume and the wind speeds applied. Two
tests are common - 3" per hour rainfall combined with 29 mph wind speeds, and 8" per
hour rainfall combined with 50 mph wind speeds. As described earlier, the air intake
velocity is the only variable.
Obviously this testing is more stringent and requires a special louver design to perform well
in this environment. Several designs are available throughout the market, but few have
surpassed the capabilities of our E2WV, E4WH, and E6WH louver models.
back to top
Every obstruction in the airstream creates resistance - louvers, ductwork, filters, coils,
building structure, etc. The resistance of the louver can be measured by running air through
the louver and measuring the pressure differential at various free area velocities (measured
in water gauge or wg). Every louver will create resistance based on the frame and blade
shapes. Lower blade angles or more aerodynamic shapes create less resistance. We must
know the free area velocity through the louver in order to properly evaluate the overall
resistance to airflow. For a majority of applications, we can calculate the pressure loss of the
louver at the required free area velocity and determine if it is acceptable. The resistance
created can be detrimental to the application of fans and other air movement equipment,
so we should attempt to minimize it.
Jump to: Location in Page
To properly evaluate a louver's capability, we must have a method to include both the Free
Area and the First Point of Water Penetration in a meaningful way. Since the overall
objective is to get as much air as possible through the louver, we want to evaluate the
allowable volume of air through the louver (cubic feet per minute or cfm). Test methods for
these principles are covered in AMCA Standard 500-L Laboratory Methods of Testing Air
Louvers for Rating. The following example compares two louvers for a wall opening size of
48" wide x 48" high with different performance characteristics:
Since our objective is to get more air through the louver, we might assume that Louver 2 is
better than Louver 1, since it has a higher free area. However, more evaluation is required.
The real question is, "How much total air can I get through the louver without entraining
water?"
Louver 1 has a free area of 45% for a size 48" wide x 48" high wall opening. The total square
Jump
feet of to: Location
free area is 7.2 (in
= Page
45% x 16 sq ft of wall opening). The tested First Point of Water
Penetration for this louver is 1190 feet per minute free area velocity. We should build in a
safety factor for some variation in our airflow through the louver - we have chosen 25%
safety factor. The design velocity including the safety factor would be 25% less than 1190
fpm, or 893 fpm (1190 x .75). We can now determine how much air can safely be run
through the louver by multiplying the louver free area by the design velocity ( 7.2 sq ft x
893 fpm). The resulting Volume of Air for Louver 1 is 6424 cfm.
If we go through the same calculations for Louver 2, the result (with a 25% safety factor) is
only 4781 cfm. This is 25% less air through the same opening size. Louver 1 is a better
choice - IF we can live with the pressure drop from the higher airflow rates! back to top
Most Manufacturers publish air flow resistance for their louvers. Each louver will have
slightly different resistance based on the blade and frame shapes and angles. These
characteristic can be expressed by a formula and graphed, such as:
Louver 1 Louver 2
Simplifying things a bit - most louvers do not fluctuate dramatically from these graphs
(about 15% in this example), unless the louver is designed for very high air velocities, like
wind driven rain louvers. However, if you have the data, use it! Here we can calculate the
resistance at the design velocities for each louver and determine that:
Louver 1 - at 893 fpm free area velocity, will create 0.090 inches w.g. of static pressure
Louver 2 - at 563 fpm free area velocity, will create 0.055 inches w.g. of static pressure
Jump to: Location in Page
Both of these values should be acceptable for HVAC system design, and would mean that
our Louver 1 is the better choice, even though the free area is lower. A good rule of thumb
is to stay below 0.2 inches w.g. static pressure for most applications. If your values exceed
this rule, we recommend you increase the opening size or select a louver model with higher
free area, higher first point of water penetration, lower pressure drop, or a combination of
these factors.
First Point of
Pressure Loss
Water Overall
at this velocity
Product Model Free Area Penetration Performance
(inches water
(free area (C.F.M.)
gauge)
velocity)
Links
Jump to: Location in Page
Home
Design Help
Gallery
Contact Us
About Us
Industry Links
Privacy Policy
Online Store
Products
Wall Louvers (Standard and Drainable)
Sunshade Louvers
Solid Awnings
Brick Vents