Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Acknowledgements ii
Table of Contents iv
Appendices x
List of Tables xi
Abstract xviii
In one paragraph; between 150 and 250 words only; followed by keywords and word
count (only five chapters excluding acknowledgement, table of contents, references,
and appendices). Emerald’s style of writing an abstract may be a very good start to
have an idea what to write in this section.
Illustrate and discuss world and domestic survey reports, indices, press releases, etc.
How did you choose the topic? What kind of greater historical context does the
research that you are engaged in exist within? You may want to talk about any related
experiments or research that specific people have done in the past, including landmark
research cases which are related to the topic at hand. This gives the reader a sense of
how your research fits into the greater scheme of things, and lets the reader compare
what you are about to present to the research which they may or may not already be
familiar with from leading figures in the history of the field.
Page 1 of 11
Include evidences/references from the last five years. These references should
be taken from impact factor journals from JCR, ABS, ABDC, Scopus-indexed
journals.
Your problem statement should not exceed one and a half page.
Do not include more than 40 words direct quotations.
Do not include less than 40 words direct quotations.
Do not include secondary sources e.g. (as cited in Adil, 2017)
Do not include any evidence/reference from tertiary sources such as thesis,
research working papers, conference papers, ResearchGate papers, abstracts,
newspapers, etc.
Clearly specify the theoretical and/or methodological research gap
Using evidences/references, discuss the research problem/gap w.r.t. your
chosen industry/sector.
Parenthetical citation style is preferred.
If your study is in a Pakistani context, use 90% of your scholarly
evidences/references from the same Pakistani context.
Simply saying you could not find any empirical papers in the Pakistani context
is perhaps acceptable but this would be a very weak argument to initiate a
graduate level research thesis.
In case of using mediator(s) and/or moderator(s), you must justify logical
reason(s) to support your claim with scholarly evidences/references.
Each paragraph should start with a logical statement, telling us what the
paragraph is about:
o “Numerous researchers have studied transformational leadership in
Fortune 500 companies (3 x citations).”
Each citation should be MULTIPLE citations, showing MULTIPLE authors.
Showcase your synthesis.
Preferably three comprehensive paragraphs as under:
o What we know? “The problem is…”; What do we know about the
problem?
o What we don’t know?
o What do researchers want us to know?
It all needs to narrow down so when someone reads your purpose statement,
they say, “Oh! Of course, we should research this.”
The last statement should be your PURPOSE STATEMENT that provides a
specific study that addresses a super-narrow sliver (or part) of the problem.
o URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj4GGzrCJm8
o Must read chapter 6 of Creswell (2009) available on my Fileserver at
\\fileserver\...Books\Research Methods\Creswell
o Example:
Who: “Principals in their first five years in this position”
Where: “privately-held secondary schools in Pakistan”
What: “conflict-management approaches”
When: 2017
How: “Quantitative study”
Page 2 of 11
The purpose of this quantitative study is to examine the conflict-management
approaches of principals in their first five years in this position at privately-held
secondary schools in Pakistan in 2017.
They are abstract and general in nature; drawn from the theoretical literature; prefer
<In separate paragraph, describe how you have organized each of your chapters>
2.0 Introduction
Page 3 of 11
<Discuss related theories as well as the main underpinning theory you are going to
apply on the following research model; must use in-text/parenthetical citations; also
provide a theoretical review of both positive and negative relationships of the two
related variables, if exists>.
Only one diagram showing all IVs, DVs, their relationships through arrowheads, their
individual hypothesis with either +ve or -ve sign within parentheses, above the
arrowhead.
These signs (either +ve or -ve) must be DERIVED from the theoretical background
discussed above.
Note: Simply a list of hypotheses in chapter 2 or 3 DOES NOT make any theoretical
and/or empirical sense.
At least 40% of the total word count of your five chapters only.
In addition, include most recent research papers preferably from the last four to five
years published in A*- or A-ranked journals.
Page 4 of 11
2.4 Summary of the chapter <Must provide a comprehensive summary of the LR>
3.0 Introduction
a) In a paragraph format; or
b) In a tabular format
a) In a paragraph Format
Firstly, you need to write the name of your first variable: Operational
definition. <adapted from ___ study; one or two sample items in “ ”> Scale
measurement (five or seven-point Likert-scale) with description 1-strongly
disagree to 7-strongly agree.
Specimen:
Page 5 of 11
In this study, readiness for change is an exogenous variable which refers to the
readiness to the major technological change exhibited by the fulltime
employees having administrative and managerial responsibilities in the
manufacturing companies of Karachi, Pakistan. This construct was measured
by 19 items adapted from Anjani and Dhanapal (2012) in the form of four
dimensions (or sub-scales) as follows: appropriateness (six items),
management support (five items), change efficacy (five items), and personally
beneficial (three items). One sample item from each sub-scale includes “I think
that the organization will benefit from this change,” “Our organization’s top
decision makers have put all their support behind this change effort,” “I do not
anticipate any problem adjusting to the work I will have when this change is
adopted,” respectively. All of these items were rated on a seven-point Likert
scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). There are no
reverse-coded items of this variable. This scale has been used in various
previous studies (e.g. ____; ____; ____) and have demonstrated very good
psychometric properties i.e. Cronbach alpha ____, ____, and ____ respectively.
Notes:
Also provide ‘alpha’ of RELATED studies so that you could JUSTIFY why
you are using your chosen scale for a variable.
Start from THE VARIABLE which is shown on the top left-hand corner of
your research framework. Maintain the sequence…
Sample item(s) to be provided in double inverted commas.
Is there any reverse-coded item(s)?
What is the type of the measuring scale used for each of the variables e.g.
Likert-scale?
Use at least five to seven Likert-scale items to measure each variable.
Caution: Total number of the required sample size increases with the
increasing number of items.
b) In a tabular format
Page 6 of 11
administrative and
managerial responsibilities in
the manufacturing companies
of Karachi, Pakistan.
Page 7 of 11
Must see Figure 13.4 ‘Choice points in sampling design’ in Sekaran
and Bougie (2016, p. 251).
3.1.8.5 Sample
Study actually done on.
Soper, 2018; GPower 3; MacCallum, Browne, & Sugawara, 1996;
Krejcie & Morgan, 1970
Location: \\fileserver\...\Shahnawaz Adil\MBA and MPhil
Theses\Sample Size Calculation
Explain your sample size, effect size, a-priori statistical power.
Note: The sample is drawn from the study population (the accessible
population) not from the target population (unless you have access to
the entire target population.
(at least three relevant, experienced, but independent industry experts; attach
evidence in Appendix –B; briefly describe their demographics too).
Separately for each variable, only discuss notable things; rests of the tables may
be provided in Appendix –C.
TABLE.
Page 8 of 11
2
Notes: If you are using SmartPLS, you can report AVE, CR, and discriminant validity
separately for each variable used in your study.
The main essence of pilot study is to prepare a valid and reliable questionnaire to be
used in the main study in Chapter 4.
4.0 Introduction
4.2.3 Missing values analysis <using Expectation Maximization; Little’s MCAR test>
Page 9 of 11
Breusch-Pagan & Koenker (BPK) test.
In case of using Smart PLS, you need to justify why you are using this software. For
this, following papers written by SEM authorities may be very useful:
For example,
4.4 Discussion
At least four to five pages, separately for each of the significant AND non-significant
hypothesized relationships as illustrated on your research framework.
You may prefer to include sources from previous studies mainly for the inconsistent
results as a support to your research findings; look into your Section 2.3.
Discuss post-hoc statistical power analysis in case if your research findings contradict with
the findings of previous related studies.
5.0 Conclusion
5.2 Directions for future research <include plausible justification with citations>
Page 10 of 11
A bibliography, on the other hand, is a list of all materials you consulted
in the process of producing your thesis, including those that ARE NOT
CITED in the thesis itself.
Great help:
http://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/manuscript-check.aspx
Appendix –A Questionnaire <the one which was used for the main study>
M. Shahnawaz Adil
Assistant Professor
Department of Business Administration
IQRA University, Karachi.
Version: 2.1.2
Page 11 of 11