Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Of all the characteristics of the various layout types, perhaps the most
generally significant are the unit cost implications of layout choice. Fixed
costs tend to increase as one moves from fixed-position to product layout
whereas variable costs per product or service tend to decrease.
ERP involves decisions about the volume (quantity) and timing of the
materials needed. This is the basis of the foundation concept for ERP
called materials requirement planning (MRP). It is a process that helps
companies make volume and timing calculations.
Enterprise resource planning is the latest, and the most significant,
development of the original materials requirement planning (MRP)
philosophy.
Manufacturing resource planning (MRP II) expanded out of MRP during
the 1980s. Its sophistication allowed modelling of ‘what if’-questions. The
strength of MRP and MRP II lay always in the fact that it could explore the
consequences of any changes to what an operation was required to do.
ERP systems allow decisions and databases from all parts of the
organization to be integrated so that the consequences of decisions in one
part of the organization are reflected in the planning and control systems
of the rest of the organization.
ERP is generally seen as having the potential to very significantly improve
the performance of many companies in many sectors. This is partly
because of the very much-enhanced visibility that information integration
gives, but it is also a function of the discipline that ERP demands.
o Because software communicates across all functions, there is
absolute visibility of what is happening in all parts of the
organization.
o There is a better ‘sense of control’ that forms the basis for
continuous improvement.
o It enables more sophisticated communication with customers,
suppliers and other business partners.
o It is capable of integrating whole supply chains including suppliers’
suppliers and customers’ customers.
However, ERP installation can be expensive to integrate. But, sometimes
businesses have to invest just to stand still. If, as many businesses find,
their current processes do not fit, they can do one of two things. They
could change their processes to fit the ERP package. Alternatively, they
could modify the software within the ERP package to fit their processes.
Both of these options include costs and risks.
If the ERP system of one operation within a supply chain fails for some
reason, it may block the effective operation of the whole integrated
information system through the chain.
By their nature, ERP systems are designed to address problems of
information fragmentation. Few people like to change, and ERP asks
almost everyone to change how they do their job.
ERP is enterprise-wide, so implementation should always be considered
on an enterprise-wide level. Therefore there will at all times be many
different stakeholders to consider, each with their own concerns.
There are a number of critical success factors (CSFs) that the organization
must ‘get right’ in order for the ERP system to work effectively. Some of
these are broad, organization-wide, or strategic factors. Others are more
project-specific, or tactical, factors.
Not covered.
Risk management is about things going wrong and what operations can
do to stop things going wrong. But recognizing that things will sometimes
go wrong is not the same as ignoring, or accepting it as inevitable. Risk
management is defined as ‘the process, which aims to help organizations
understand, evaluate, and take action on all their risks with a view to
increasing the probability of their success and reducing the likelihood of
failure’.
Dealing with failures, and therefore managing risk, generally involves
four sets of activities.
o The first is concerned with understanding what failures could
potentially occur.
Understand the potential sources of risk. This means
assessing where failure might occur and what the
consequences of failure might be.
The causes of some failures are purely random, like
lightning strikes, and are difficult, if not impossible to
predict. However, the vast majority of failures are caused
by something that could have been avoided.
Supply failure (e.g. supplier delivering the wrong or
faulty components)
Human failure (when key personnel leaves or
becomes ill, or where people are doing their job but
are making mistakes)
o Errors are mistakes in judgement where a
person should have done something different.
o Violations are acts, which are clearly contrary
to defined operating procedure.
o Catastrophic errors are often a combination
of errors and violations.
Organizational failure (failures of procedures and
processes and structure and culture)
Technology and facilities failure (e.g. failure in IT
systems, machines, equipment and buildings)
Product/service design failure (sometimes a result
of the trade-off between fast time-to-market
performance and the risk of the product or service
failing in the operation)
Customer failure (misuse of the product or service)
Environmental disruption (e.g. 9/11)
E-security (danger of technology)
One of the critical activities of operations and process
resilience is to understand why a failure has occurred. This
activity is called failure analysis.
Estimates of failure based on historical performance can be
measured in three ways: failure rates (how often do failures
occur), reliability (the chances of a failure occurring) and
availability (the amount of available useful operating time).
Sometimes failure is a function of time. For example, the
probability of an electric lamp failing is relatively high
when it’s first used, but if it survives this initial stage
(‘early-life’), it could still fail at any point (‘normal-life
stage’), and the longer it survives, the more likely its failure
becomes (‘wear-out stage’). The curve, which describes
failure probability of this type, is called the bathtub curve.
One of the best-known approaches to assessing the relative
significance of failure is failure mode and effect analysis
(FMEA). Its objective is to identify the factors that are
critical to various types of failure as a means of identifying
failures before they happen. It does this by providing a
‘checklist’ procedure built around three questions for each
possible cause of failure:
What is the likelihood that failure will occur?
What would be the consequence of failure?
How likely is such a failure to be detected before it
affects the customer?
o The second task is to examine ways of preventing failures.
Try to prevent the failure from occurring in the first place.
The obvious way to do this is to systematically examine any
processes involved and ‘design out’ any failure points.
Building in redundancy to an operation means having back-
up systems or components in case of failure. It can be
expensive and is generally used when the breakdown could
have a critical impact (e.g. nuclear power stations or
hospitals). It is divided into hot standby, warm standby, or
cold standby.
Fail-safeing is based on the principle that human mistakes
are to some extent inevitable. What is important is to
prevent them becoming defects. Poka-yokes are simple
(preferably inexpensive) devices or systems, which are
incorporated into a process to prevent inadvertent
operator mistakes resulting in a defect (e.g. beepers on
ATMs to ensure that customers remove their cards).
Maintenance is how organizations try to avoid failure by
taking care of their physical facilities. The benefits of
effective maintenance include enhanced safety, increased
reliability, higher quality (badly maintained equipment is
more likely to cause errors), lower operating costs (because
regularly serviced process technology is more efficient), a
longer lifespan for process technology, and higher ‘end-
value’ (because well-maintained facilities are generally
easier to dispose of into the second-hand market). There
are three basic approaches to maintenance:
Run-to-breakdown maintenance – allowing the
facilities to continue operating until they fail (e.g.
hotel television will only be repaired once it fails)
Preventive maintenance – attempts to eliminate or
reduce the chances of failure by servicing the
facilities at pre-planned intervals (e.g. checking of
aircraft engines)
Condition-based maintenance – maintenance only
when the facilities require it. Monitoring is being
used to decide whether the process should be
stopped and parts replaced. This method is used
where maintenance activity is expensive, either
because of the cost of providing the maintenance
itself, or because of the disruption, which the
maintenance activity causes to the operation.
Most operations adopt a mixture of these approaches.
Total productive maintenance (TPM) is ‘the productive
maintenance carried out by all employees through small
group activities’, where productive maintenance is
‘maintenance management, which recognizes the
importance of reliability, maintenance, and economic
efficiency in plant design’. The five goals of TPM:
Improve equipment effectiveness;
Achieve autonomous maintenance;
Plan maintenance;
Train all staff in relevant maintenance skills;
Achieve early equipment management.
Reliability-centred maintenance (RCM) uses the pattern of
failure for each type of failure mode of a part of a system to
dictate the approach to its maintenance.
o The third is to minimize the negative consequences of failure (risk
mitigation).
Risk mitigation means isolating a failure from its negative
consequences. Mitigation can be vital when used in
conjunction with prevention in reducing overall risk. Risk
mitigation actions:
Mitigation planning – is the activity of ensuring that
all possible failure circumstances have been
identified and the appropriate mitigation actions
identified.
Economic mitigation – includes actions such as
insurance against losses from failure.
Containment (spatial) – means stopping the failure
physically spreading to affect other parts of an
internal or external supply network.
Containment (temporal) – means containing the
spread of a failure over time (e.g. systems that give
advanced warning of hazardous weather).
Loss reduction – covers any action that reduces the
catastrophic consequence of failure by removing the
resources that are likely to suffer those
consequences.
Substitution – means compensating for failure by
providing other resources that can substitute for
those rendered less effective by the failure.
o The fourth task is to devise plans and procedures that will hep the
operation to recover form failures when they occur.
In parallel with considering how to prevent failures
occurring, operations managers need to decide what they
will do when failures do occur. This activity is called failure
recovery.
Recovery procedures will also shape customers’
perceptions of failure. In many situations, customers may
well accept that things do go wrong.
Organizations need to design appropriate responses to
failure, linked to the cost and the inconvenience caused by
the failure to the customer, which will meet the needs and
expectations of the customer.
The activity of devising the procedures, which allow the
operation to recover from failure, is called failure planning.
It includes: discover, act, learn, and plan.
Failure analysis mechanisms include accident investigation, product
liability, complaint analysis, critical incident analysis, and failure mode
and effect analysis (FMEA).
Recovery can be enhanced by a systematic approach to discovering what
has happened to cause failure, acting to inform, contain and follow up the
consequences of failure, learning to find the root cause of the failure and
preventing it taking place again, and planning to avoid the failure form
occurring in the future.