Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
19 )
RYAN COFFEY, individually and on behalf of ) CASE NO.: 3:18-cv-03286
20 all others similarly situated, )
) STIPULATION REGARDING
21 Plaintiff, ) DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO ANSWER OR
) OTHERWISE RESPOND PURSUANT
22 ) TO CIVIL L.R. 6-1(a)
)
23 v. )
)
24 RIPPLE LABS INC., et al., )
)
25 )
)
26 Defendants. )
)
27 )
)
28
STIPULATION REGARDING DEFS’ TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND CASE NO. 3:18-CV-03286
Case 4:18-cv-03286-PJH Document 5 Filed 06/01/18 Page 2 of 4
1 WHEREAS, on June 1, 2018, Defendants Ripple Labs Inc., XRP II, LLC, and Bradley
2 Garlinghouse (collectively, “Defendants”), removed this matter from the Superior Court of the
3 State of California, County of San Francisco (“San Francisco Superior Court”), to the United States
7 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed upon a brief extension of Defendants’ time to answer,
8 move, or otherwise respond to the complaint;
11 Court order.
14 follows:
21 //
22 //
23 //
24 //
25 //
26 //
27 //
28 //
STIPULATION REGARDING DEFS’ TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND CASE NO. 3:18-CV-03286
Case 4:18-cv-03286-PJH Document 5 Filed 06/01/18 Page 3 of 4
4 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
5 DATED: June 1, 2018
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION REGARDING DEFS’ TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND CASE NO. 3:18-CV-03286
Case 4:18-cv-03286-PJH Document 5 Filed 06/01/18 Page 4 of 4
1 E-FILING ATTESTATION
2 I, Peter Morrison, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this
3 document. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that each of the
4 signatories identified above has concurred in this filing.
6
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
7
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION REGARDING DEFS’ TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND CASE NO. 3:18-CV-03286