Sie sind auf Seite 1von 31

DAYLIGH

HTING GUID
DE FOR TH
HE COMME
ERCIAL OF
FFICE
WHO ARE THE PLAYERS?

SPONSOR

Advanced Energy Office


FFICE
ERCIAL OF

COLLABORATORS
HE COMME

New Buildings Institute


Dave Hewitt
Amy Cortese
Barb Hamilton
DE FOR TH

IA | Interior Architects
Nancy Heywood
Kim Parsley
Elsa Allen
HTING GUID

Brian van Stipdonk

University of Washington – Integrated Design Lab


Christopher Meek
DAYLIGH
PROJECT GOALS

TARGETS

Provide resources to communicate how the design of an


office interior provides substantial opportunity to use daylight.
FFICE

Educate designers and occupants on benefits of buildings


ERCIAL OF

illuminated with daylight:

 Healthier and higher quality interior environments


 Increased individual productivity
HE COMME

 Increased human comfort


 Mental and visual stimulation
DE FOR TH
HTING GUID
DAYLIGH
LAYOUT OF THE GUIDE

Steps to accomplishing
specific
ifi topic
t i within
ithi the
th guide
id
DE FOR TH
HTING GUID
DAYLIGH FFICE
ERCIAL OF
HE COMME
LAYOUT OF THE GUIDE

Facts, Tips, and Glossary

 Did you know a mid-day overcast


summer sky provides a range of
FFICE

2200 to 6400 footcandles?


ERCIAL OF

 Footcandles are a unit of


measurement for calculating
adequate lighting levels.
HTING GUID
DAYLIGH HE COMME
DE FOR TH
LAYOUT OF THE GUIDE

Resources

 Helpful websites linked in the


electronic document and tips for
FFICE

searching the web from the hard


copy
DE FOR TH
HTING GUID
DAYLIGH ERCIAL OF
HE COMME
LAYOUT OF THE GUIDE

Resources

 Tips for searching the website


DE FOR TH
HTING GUID
DAYLIGH FFICE
ERCIAL OF
HE COMME
LAYOUT OF THE GUIDE

Resources

 Tips for searching the website


DE FOR TH
HTING GUID
DAYLIGH FFICE
ERCIAL OF
HE COMME
PROGRAMMING

 Visit the building site to evaluate:


 View
Vi opportunities
t iti
 Potential glare from
adjacent buildings
FFICE

 Shading from adjacent


buildings
ERCIAL OF

 Visual privacy

 Determine daylighting and view


criteria for each program element
 Is daylight even desired?
HE COMME

 How critical is glare control


and direct sun?
 What are the maximum light
levels required?
DE FOR TH
HTING GUID
DAYLIGH
PROGRAMMING

 Diagram the daylighting and view


opportunities
t iti on the
th floor
fl plan
l
DE FOR TH
HTING GUID
DAYLIGH FFICE
ERCIAL OF
HE COMME
SPACE PLANNING

 Align programming criteria with


mostt desirable
d i bl llocation
ti on th the
plan.
 Locate open office areas
FFICE

within 18’ – 20’ of the


perimeter glazing
ERCIAL OF

 Position private offices


where low angle direct sun
may otherwise be
problematic
HTING GUID
DAYLIGH HE COMME
DE FOR TH
WINDOW COVERING DESIGN

 Select appropriate window


coverings
i t diffuse
to diff light
li ht

 Remember potential for sunlight


FFICE

glare off of adjacent buildings


ERCIAL OF

 Consider the need for visual


privacy from neighboring buildings
HTING GUID
DAYLIGH HE COMME
DE FOR TH
WORKSTATION PANEL DESIGN

 Plan for open office workstation


panels
l no hihigher
h ththan 42” where
h
parallel to perimeter windows
FFICE

 Higher panels can be located


perpendicular to path of daylight
ERCIAL OF

 Minimize glare on computer


screens but suggesting users
orient perpendicular to windows
HTING GUID
DAYLIGH HE COMME
DE FOR TH
INTERIOR SURFACE FINISHES

 Choose interior finishes that will


supportt the
th maximum
i efficiency
ffi i off
lighting
FFICE

 Early decisions on Light


Reflectance Values of finishes are
ERCIAL OF

important in appropriate planning


of electric light levels

 If windows are an obvious bright


spot in an interior environment,
HE COMME

the rest of the space will be


perceived as dark
DE FOR TH
HTING GUID
DAYLIGH
LIGHTING AND CONTROLS

 Integrate a lighting control system


i t the
into th space:
 What are the desired,
maintained light levels in
FFICE

each space?
 What will the transitions
ERCIAL OF

between light levels feel


like?
 Will other light sources
interfere with the photocell
to control a particular zone?
HTING GUID
DAYLIGH HE COMME
DE FOR TH
LIGHTING AND CONTROLS

 Offices and Retail spaces utilize


th mostt substantial
the b t ti l amounts t off
lighting energy over all building
types
FFICE

 By incorporating optimal daylight


ERCIAL OF

strategies, an office’s total energy


costs can be reduced by one third

 Utilities offer financial rebates for


efficient lighting plans and
HE COMME

maximized use of occupancy &


vacancy sensors

 User education and acceptance is


critical in maintaining the
DE FOR TH

proposed lighting controls long


term
HTING GUID
DAYLIGH
CHECKLIST

 Critical relationships to remember:

 The sky as a light source


FFICE

 Massing and orientation of a


building (or space within a
ERCIAL OF

building)

 Depth of the floor plate

 Windowcoverings
HE COMME

 Interior surface finishes

 Interior furnishings
DE FOR TH

 Orientation of the occupant


in their workspace
HTING GUID
DAYLIGH
CASE STUDY – IA NEW YORK

MMING
8th floor downtown New York
City

PROGRAM
 Northern & Western exposures
FFICE

 No adjacent buildings to the

NNING
North

SPACE PLAN
ERCIAL OF

 Neighboring building across the


street to the West

ERING
HE COMME

WINDOW COVE
DESIGN
DE FOR TH

WORKSTATIONN
PANEL DESIGN
N
HTING GUID

INTERIOR SURFACE
E
FINISHES
DAYLIGH

LIGHTING CONTROLS
ELECTRICAL

Designed by IA Interior Architects


CASE STUDY – IA NEW YORK

View to park below

MMING
 Daylight important to areas where

PROGRAM
staff
t ff spend
d mostt off their
th i day
d – N adjacent
No dj tbbuildings
ildi
Open Office
FFICE

EAST
 Direct sun on computer screens

NNING
or worksurfaces was not desirable

SPACE PLAN
ERCIAL OF

 Desk “benching” layout without


workstation panels supports
daylighting programming

ERING
HE COMME

WINDOW COVE
DESIGN
 Primary visual field (computer
screens) oriented perpendicular to NORTH
Western sun entering space
No adjacent bldgs
DE FOR TH

thi h
this height
i ht
WORKSTATIONN
PANEL DESIGN
N
HTING GUID

INTERIOR SURFACE
E
FINISHES

WEST
DAYLIGH

LIGHTING CONTROLS

Building across street is a


few stories higher
ELECTRICAL

Designed by IA Interior Architects


CASE STUDY – IA NEW YORK

MMING
 Window shades selected to

PROGRAM
maintain
i t i view
i outside
t id when
h
shades are down
FFICE

 Shades have 5% openness factor

NNING
ERCIAL OF

SPACE PLAN
 Shades installed on all North side
windows
A B
 Create privacy in
evening/late afternoon in

WINDOW COVERING
HE COMME

Winter

DESIGN
 Minimize glare off of
adjacent buildings during
day
DE FOR TH

WORKSTATIONN
PANEL DESIGN
N

 Shades installed on all West side


windows
HTING GUID

INTERIOR SURFACE
E
FINISHES
DAYLIGH

LIGHTING CONTROLS
ELECTRICAL

Designed by IA Interior Architects


A Western exposure windows. No direct B Computer screens perpendicular to
sun on work surfaces. Shades up. daylight distribution. Shades partially down
CASE STUDY – IA NEW YORK

MMING
 Light interior finishes, those with Ceiling: 80% LRV

PROGRAM
hi h Li
high Light
ht R
Reflectance
fl t V
Values,
l
maximize the efficiency of lighting Walls: 85% LRV
(daylight and electric) throughout
FFICE

the space Work Surfaces: 85% LRV

NNING
SPACE PLAN
ERCIAL OF

 Power of the sun is maximized to


Floor: 10% LRV
light the space

 98” high windows & high light

ERING
reflectance values on finishes
HE COMME

WINDOW COVE
bounce daylight far into the space
DESIGN
 Windows don’t appear as bright
spots when the brightness of the
adjacent space is balanced
DE FOR TH

WORKSTATIONN
PANEL DESIGN
N
HTING GUID

INTERIOR SURFACE
E
FINISHES
DAYLIGH

LIGHTING CONTROLS
ELECTRICAL

Balanced brightness at Electric lighting is used to compliment daylight and balance


Designed by IA Interior Architects
exterior windows brightness throughout the space
CASE STUDY – SEATTLE HQ

MMING
 The lowest, 48” high, workstation

PROGRAM
panels are oriented perpendicular
to daylight distribution 7’-0” high
FFICE

 62” high panels create a spine for 62” high

NNING
greater visual privacy & more

SPACE PLAN
ERCIAL OF

surface area for markerboard and


tack 48” high

 Ceiling height panels always

ERING
HE COMME

WINDOW COVE
maintain a clear glass “clerestory”
“ ”

DESIGN
above 7’-0”
 Still allows some daylight
into the space
DE FOR TH

WORKSTATIONN
PANEL DESIGN
N
HTING GUID

INTERIOR SURFACE
FINISHES
DAYLIGH

LIGHTING CONTROLS
ELECTRICAL

Designed by IA Interior Architects


Staff with less need for privacy maximize shared daylight and views
CASE STUDY – SEATTLE HQ

MMING
 Ceiling mounted fixtures

PROGRAM
minimized
 Continuous dimming in
Zone A Zone B
daylighting zone
FFICE

NNING
 User-controlled
User controlled task lights

SPACE PLAN
ERCIAL OF

maximized Zone D Zone C

 Maximized energy efficiency


 Occupancy sensors integral

ERING
HE COMME

WINDOW COVE
to task light = rebate from
DESIGN
Lighting Control Zone – Continuous Dimming Daylight Controls
local utility Lighting Control Zone –Daylight Zone with Photocell, Continuous Dimming, Manual
Switch On, Vacancy Sensor Off
 Light only where needed =
Task Lighting with Occupancy Sensor
rebate from local utility
Lighting Control Zones Per Program Requirements
 Vacancy sensors in
DE FOR TH

WORKSTATIONN
PANEL DESIGN
N

conference rooms & offices Work Station: 30-50FC


Occupant can control task
light at work station,
accommodating various tasks
and personal preferences.
HTING GUID

INTERIOR SURFACE
E

Open Office Pathway: 10-15FC


FINISHES

Light distribution on floor,


walls, and ceiling create the
perception of a well-lit space.
DAYLIGH

C
Common C
Corridors:
id 10
10-25FC
25FC
LIGHTING CONTROLS
ELECTRICAL

Central pathway requires


minimal light, but wall
washers at markerboards and
accent lighting create interest.
Designed by IA Interior Architects
CASE STUDY – SEATTLE HQ

Lighting

MMING
 Occupant education controls

PROGRAM
 Lighting scene controls
 Fixtures dimming in daylight
zone
FFICE

 After hours overrides

NNING
SPACE PLAN
ERCIAL OF

 Give purpose to design


 Cost savings (lower utilities)
 Minimize CO2 emissions

ERING
 User control
HE COMME

WINDOW COVE
 Energy conservation
DESIGN

After Hours
Occupancy
overrides
DE FOR TH

WORKSTATIONN
PANEL DESIGN
N

sensors on
task lights
HTING GUID

INTERIOR SURFACE
E
FINISHES
DAYLIGH

LIGHTING CONTROLS
ELECTRICAL

Designed by IA Interior Architects


CASE STUDY – HERMAN MILLER

MMING
 Use of skylights key to creating

PROGRAM
pleasant
l t work
k environment
i t

 Toplighting tends to provide the


FFICE

most effective daylight


performance, since it typically

NNING
g
avoids the direct sunlight

SPACE PLAN
ERCIAL OF

associated with perimeter


windows

 Electric lighting design

VERING
compliments the toplighting layout
HE COMME

to maximize daylight opportunities

WINDOW COV
DESIGN
N
Skylights
Light Fixtures
Not In Contract
DE FOR TH

ON
GN
WORKSTATIO
PANEL DESIG
HTING GUID

INTERIOR SURFAACE
FINISHES LS
DAYLIGH

LIGHTING CONTROL
ELECTRICAL

Designed by IA Interior Architects


CASE STUDY – HERMAN MILLER

MMING
 Depth of floor plate challenging;

PROGRAM
Use of skylights was critical in
providing cues to the outdoors
FFICE

 Main Street planning concept

NNING
SPACE PLAN
ERCIAL OF

195’-7”
 Hubs of activity along Main Street

ERING
HE COMME

Main Street

WINDOW COVE
DESIGN
Landmarks
Destinations
Nodes
Circulation
Not In Contract
DE FOR TH

WORKSTATIONN
PANEL DESIGN
N
HTING GUID

INTERIOR SURFACE
E
FINISHES
DAYLIGH

LIGHTING CONTROLS
ELECTRICAL

Designed by IA Interior Architects


CASE STUDY – HERMAN MILLER

 Herman Miller conducted

MMING
employee surveys post

PROGRAM
occupancy.
Overall 88% say that the changes
made were positive
FFICE

NNING
 90% say that the changes to

SPACE PLAN
ERCIAL OF

their physical environment


allow them to get their work
done more effectively, a 17%
increase.

 There was a 32% improvement

ERING
HE COMME

i employee
in l retention.
t ti
WINDOW COVE
 92% say that the office’s DESIGN

physical environment positively


affects their job satisfaction, a
rise of 30%.
DE FOR TH

WORKSTATIONN
PANEL DESIGN
N

 There was a 67% improvement


in the overall satisfaction of
individual workstations.

 84% of employees
HTING GUID

p y felt that the


INTERIOR SURFACE
E

new office was a quality work


FINISHES

environment, as opposed to
31% in the prior space.
DAYLIGH

LIGHTING CONTROLS
ELECTRICAL

Designed by IA Interior Architects


CASE STUDY – EXPEDIA HQ

NORTH

MMING
 Daylight and views important to

PROGRAM
staff in open office
Building across street
is a few stories higher
 Office occupants are not in offices
FFICE

all day long

NNING
SPACE PLAN
ERCIAL OF

 Create a reason for people to


WEST
have lunch in Kitchenettes so they
don’t stay at desks all day –
View of green
daylight & view can be a draw

ERING
space & water
HE COMME

WINDOW COVE
DESIGN
 Target LEED Daylighting & Views
credit for Commercial Interiors
Legend
certification
Daylight available, requires occupant control of glare
 Although dark tinting of
DE FOR TH

WORKSTATIONN
PANEL DESIGN
N

Direct sunlight, requires occupant control of glare


exterior glass helped View to Mt. Rainier
Minimal daylight penetration or view opportunities
minimize heat loads, it was No daylight penetration or view opportunities
too dark to achieve Approximate daylight penetration (1.5x to 2x window head height)
Daylighting credit Zones of direct sun exposure in the Northern Hemisphere
HTING GUID

INTERIOR SURFACE
E
FINISHES
DAYLIGH

LIGHTING CONTROLS
ELECTRICAL

Designed by IA Interior Architects


CASE STUDY – EXPEDIA HQ

Ideal for open office Although this zone is ideal for open office work

MMING
 Perimeter offices located so as stations, this space had other program drivers.

PROGRAM
nott to
t block
bl k allll access to
t daylight
d li ht
for Open Office staff Although this Private offices or
zone is ideal for conference rooms
private offices or buffer open office
FFICE

conference
 Private offices can be located on rooms, this
from Eastern sun
exposure

NNING
space had other
Eastern & Western exposures as program drivers.

SPACE PLAN
ERCIAL OF

occupants are likely to adjust


window blinds during the day

Although this
 Kitchenette located on windows zone is ideal for
private offices or

ERING
with view of Mt. Rainier conference
HE COMME

WINDOW COVE
Private offices or rooms, this space

DESIGN
conference rooms had other
buffer open office program drivers.
from Western sun
exposure
DE FOR TH

WORKSTATIONN
PANEL DESIGN
N

Break room, which gets intermittent use, could Ideal for open office
have tolerated East or West exposure.
Adjoining program drivers and territorial views
dictated this location.

Legend
HTING GUID

INTERIOR SURFACE
E

Da light a
Daylight available,
ailable req
requires
ires occ
occupant
pant control of glare
FINISHES

Direct sunlight, requires occupant control of glare


Minimal daylight penetration or view opportunities
No daylight penetration or view opportunities
DAYLIGH

LIGHTING CONTROLS
ELECTRICAL

Designed by IA Interior Architects


CASE STUDY – EXPEDIA HQ

 Average LPD for tenant spaces:

MMING
0 76 W/sf
0.76

PROGRAM
 Occupancy sensors located in

Zone G
enclosed spaces – estimated
FFICE

Zone F Zone H
reduction of full load by 10% Zone I

NNING
during operating hours

SPACE PLAN
ERCIAL OF

ERING

Zone D
Zone B
HE COMME

WINDOW COVE
Zone E

DESIGN
Zone A Zone C
DE FOR TH

WORKSTATIONN
PANEL DESIGN
N

L
Legend
d
Lighting Control Zone – Daylighting, Continuous Dimming on Photocell
Lighting Control Zone and Enclosed Program – Manual Switch “On” with Vacancy Sensor “Off”
Lighting Control Zone – Continuous Dimming
Lighting Control Zones Per Program Requirements
HTING GUID

INTERIOR SURFACE
E
FINISHES
DAYLIGH

LIGHTING CONTROLS
ELECTRICAL

Designed by IA Interior Architects


CONCLUSION

CHECKLIST ITEMS
 www.newbuildings.org

 www.integrateddesignlab.com
 Determine daylighting and view criteria for each program element.
 www.interiorarchitects.com
FFICE

 Do a site visit to understand the existing conditions during the hours of


occupancy.
ERCIAL OF

 Diagram out the daylighting and view opportunities on the floor plan.

 Align the program criteria for each space with the most desirable location
on the floor plan.

 Select the appropriate window covering for the space.


HE COMME

space Privacy needs


should be a consideration.

 Choose interior finishes that will support the maximum efficiency of


electrical lighting and daylighting but also support balanced luminosity.
DE FOR TH

 Plan for open office workstation panels to be 42”


42 or lower where they are
parallel to the perimeter window.

 Integrate a lighting control system into the space. zone areas with similar
daylight performance together to help reduce electrical light output.
HTING GUID
DAYLIGH

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen