ActaTechnicaNapocensis: Civil Engineering & Architecture

Journalhomepage:http://constructii.utcluj.ro/ActaCivilEng

ActaTechnicaNapocensis:CivilEngineering&Architecture
Journal homepage:http://constructii.utcluj.ro/ActaCivilEng
ISSN1221-5848

ISSN: 1221-5848
WWW:

Editor-In-Chief: Prof. Cosmin G. Chiorean

(Tech.Univ.ofCluj-Napoca,Romania)
Phone/Fax: 40-264-594967
E-mail:

Affiliation toOrganization:
TechnicalUniversityofCluj-Napoca,FacultyofCivilEngineering,Romania

Editorial Office Address:

Technical University of Cluj-Napoca
15CDaicoviciuStr., 400020 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Published by:
UTPRESS
34ObservatoruluiStr., 400775 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Phone: 40-264-401999
E-mail: Fax: 40-264-430408

Abstractingand Indexing

PAPER REVIEW
FORM

Paper No:3.7

Author(s):--------------

PaperTitle: Urban Regeneration Matters in Turda, Cluj County.Remapping Post-modern Mihai Viteazul Obelisk
Park by the Mean of Memorial Pedestrian Paths
Conference section: 3. The new and the old: technology's impact on culture & heritage

Datereceived:16th of March, 2018Datereturned: 23rd of March, 2018

Comments to
Editor
 ActaTechnicaNapocensis: Civil Engineering & Architecture
Journalhomepage:http://constructii.utcluj.ro/ActaCivilEng

RECOMMENDATION
 Accept as is
XAcceptifminorrevisions are made(re-reviewunnecessary)
 Acceptonlyifrequired revisionsaremade(re-reviewnecessary)
 Reject
Explanations/Suggestions: .........................................................................

CONTENTS
1.Type of paper :
 Theoreticalresearch Experimentalresearch
 Reviewof existing technique XOther:project description
Explanations/Suggestions: .........................................................................

2. Abstract: does the abstract contain the aim, methodology, results and findings of the research?
XYes No
Explanations/Suggestions: methodology, results and findings need to be added

3. Originality:
 Originalwork Minorextensionofknowntechnique
 Nothing speciallynew Other:
Explanations/Suggestions: will be evaluated for the final paper

4.Significance :
 High value of current interest XMarginalvalueofcurrentinterest
 No significant value Other :
Explanations/Suggestions: .........................................................................

5. Comprehensibility
 Wellwritten,Easily understood XSeveralreading are neededtounderstand
 Virtually unreadable(needrewriting bya nativeEnglishspeaker)
Explanations/Suggestions: .........................................................................

6.Details
- Adequacy oftitle? Yes
- Adequacyofsummary and keywords? Yes
Explanations/Suggestions: too long sophisticated title, there are no keywords

Reviewed by:

Signature Date 23.03.2018

 Comments to Author(s)
The summary seems to start describing a project.The paper needs to clarify the research process.