Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
YOU WILL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the above named Plaintiff, by and through his
undersigned counsel of record, hereby files this his Notice of Intent to File Suit, pursuant to
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Grand Strand Regional Medical Center”) is, upon information and belief, a limited liability
company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware that owns property and
3. Defendant Dr. Zachary Bryant (hereinafter “Defendant Dr. Bryant”) is, upon
information and belief, a citizen and resident of Horry County, South Carolina. Further
1
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2018 May 04 3:52 PM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2018NI2600019
Defendant Dr. Bryant, upon information and belief, was at all times relevant hereto practicing
4. Defendant Dr. Antonio D. Pepe (hereinafter “Defendant Dr. Pepe”) is, upon
information and belief, a citizen and resident of Horry County, South Carolina. Further,
Defendant Dr. Pepe, upon information and belief, was at all times relevant hereto practicing
6. This honorable Court has jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter of this
7. On or about May 18, 2016, Plaintiff was involved in a motorcycle crash resulting
8. That same day, Plaintiff presented to South Strand Medical Center complaining of
right shoulder pain and pain on his right side exacerbated by breathing. Plaintiff was found to
have a collapsed right lung, among other diagnoses, and was transported to Grand Strand
9. On or about May 18, 2016, Plaintiff underwent surgery at the Grand Strand
Regional Medical Center to have a chest tube inserted to heal the collapsed lung. Upon
information and belief, the procedure was performed by Defendant Dr. Bryant with the
assistance of and under the supervision of Defendant Dr. Pepe. According to the May 18, 2016
2
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2018 May 04 3:52 PM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2018NI2600019
inframammary crease. Utilizing blunt dissection a subcutaneous
tunnel was created cephalad just adjacent to the superior rib. The
pleural space was entered bluntly and gush of air and blood was
observed. A finger was inserted into the pleural space to check for
anatomy and guide tube insertion. A 36F thoracostomy tube was
inserted using a Kelly clam and positioned appropriately. The
chest tube was sutured securely to the skin and a sterile dressing
applied. A pleurevac was attached to the chest tube and a chest x-
ray obtained.
10. Upon information and belief, Plaintiff remained hospitalized at Defendant Grand
Strand Regional Medical Center until the chest tube was surgically removed on or about May 21,
2016. Upon information and belief, no surgery note exists describing the removal of the chest
tube from Plaintiff. Upon information and belief, Plaintiff was discharged from Defendant
11. Plaintiff returned home to Gaffney, South Carolina. Plaintiff’s chest tube incision
failed to close and/or heal, and Plaintiff sought treatment from his primary care physician,
12. Plaintiff’s incision continually failed to heal, and Dr. Morgan referred Plaintiff for
wound care at Mary Black Health System Gaffney where William E. Wheeler, M.D. and Howard
13. On or about October 21, 2016, Plaintiff was referred to Steven Anthony Leyland,
M.D. because the chest tube incision had not closed and/or healed. On or about November 2,
2016, Dr. Leyland performed exploratory surgery at the site of Plaintiff’s chest tube incision to
determine why it failed to heal. As noted in Dr. Anthony Leyland’s Operative Findings detailed
below, Dr. Leyland, upon information and belief, discovered and removed a portion of a surgical
glove left in Plaintiff from the chest tube placement and removal performed by Defendants:
3
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2018 May 04 3:52 PM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2018NI2600019
marked induration and chronic tissue changes within the sinus
once it was opened. On reaching the midpoint of the sinus tract a
foreign body was encountered with appeared to be a portion of a
surgical glove. This was removed without difficulty.
14. Plaintiff also needed surgery to repair his right shoulder that was injured in the
motorcycle accident; however, Plaintiff was unable to have the surgery until the chest tube
15. While Plaintiff was under the care of Defendants, Defendants failed to provide
adequate and appropriate treatment, including the failure to properly assess the Plaintiff, failure
to properly evaluate the Plaintiff, failure to properly treat the Plaintiff, failure to remove a
foreign body in Plaintiff prior to closure, failure to promptly treat the Plaintiff, and failure to
meet ordinary and customary standards of care. Defendants’ failures, individually and /or in
concert with medical staff to be identified through the course of discovery, resulted in Plaintiff
undergoing extensive additional wound treatment and expense, including an additional surgery,
the delay of Plaintiff’s needed shoulder surgery, and subsequent damages suffered by Plaintiff.
16. Defendant Grand Strand Regional Medical Center held itself out to Plaintiff and
to the public at large as a hospital employing qualified and competent doctors and nurses capable
of exercising the requisite degree of skill and care. Defendant Grand Strand Regional Medical
Center owes Plaintiff a duty to meet or exceed the applicable standard of care.
17. Defendant Dr. Bryant held himself out to Plaintiff and to the public at large as a
licensed physician competent to exercise the requisite degree of skill and care. Defendants owed
Plaintiff a duty to exercise the degree of skill and care that a reasonable prudent physician with
18. Defendant Dr. Pepe held himself out to Plaintiff and to the public at large as a
licensed physician competent to exercise the requisite degree of skill and care. Defendants owed
4
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2018 May 04 3:52 PM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2018NI2600019
Plaintiff a duty to exercise the degree of skill and care that a reasonable prudent physician with
19. Defendants failed to provide such care to Plaintiff in one or more particulars as set
forth above.
extensive additional wound treatment and expense, including an additional surgery and the delay
of Plaintiff’s needed shoulder surgery as set forth hereinabove, and associated damages. Said
21. This case is within the ambit of common knowledge and therefore, no Expert
Affidavit is required. See S.C. Code of Laws § 15-36-100(C)(2); Brouwer v. Sisters of Charity
5
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2018 May 04 3:52 PM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2018NI2600019
f. Steven Anthony Leyland, M.D.
Medical Group of the Carolinas Cardiothoracic Surgery
i. Plaintiff reserves the right to call as a witness any other individual whose
identity may become known through further investigation and such
discovery.
Surgery; Mary Black Health System Gaffney, Wound Care; and Grand
6
ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2018 May 04 3:52 PM - HORRY - COMMON PLEAS - CASE#2018NI2600019
4. Statement of damages claimed:
a. Medical bills.
b. Lost Wages.
c. All other cognizable damages recoverable per the Common Law of the
State South Carolina.
b. Plaintiff reserves the right to elicit expert testimony from any treating
physician or other medical provider as to the treatment rendered Plaintiff.
c. Plaintiff reserves the right to retain additional experts as issues may arise
through discovery.
HARRISON|WHITE, PC
s/Wes A. Kissinger
Wes A. Kissinger
S. C. Bar No: 13949
P. O. Box 3547
Spartanburg, SC 29304
Spartanburg, South Carolina 864-585-5100