ZIMBRA OPEN SOURCE

EDITION LICENSE FAQ

Zimbra has provided this FAQ to help clarify legal matters surrounding the licensing of the Open Source Web Client,
Zimlets, Server, GNU General Public License, and the Common Public Attribution License. This is not legal advice; if
there are any specific questions about how Zimbra’s licenses apply to your use, please seek legal counsel.

1. Q: What is the License for Zimbra’s Open Source Edition Web Client Code?
A: The Zimbra Open Source Edition Web Client Code is licensed under the Common Public Attribution License
Version 1.0 (CPAL v.1).

2. Q: What is the License for Zimbra’s Open License Community Zimlets Code?
A: The Zimbra Open License Community Zimlet Code is licensed under the Common Public Attribution License
Version 1.0 (CPAL v.1).

3. Q: What is the License for Zimbra’s Open Source Edition Server Code?
A: The Zimbra Open Source Edition Server Code is licensed under the GNU General Public License Version 2 (GPL
v.2). That means you are free to download, reuse, modify, and distribute those files under the terms of the GPL
Version 2 and to run the Server in combination with any code with any license that is compatible with Version 2
such as the Affero General Public License (AGPL) version 3.

4. Q: Why is Zimbra using two different licenses?

A: Zimbra has chosen two licenses to create a distinction between the server platform and web applications built
on top of that platform.

5. Q: Isn’t CPAL incompatible with GPL?

A: Correct, the CPAL v.1 is incompatible with the GPL if the software is linked. There is no linking between the OS
Server and the Web Client/Community Zimlet. Therefore, there is no conflict between the two licenses.

6. Q: What makes the CPAL different?

A: CPAL v.1 is based on the Mozilla Public License Version 1.1 but Sections 14 and 15 have been added to provide
for limited attribution for the Original Developer and cover use of software over a computer network. The
attribution provision in Section 14 permits an attribution notice with the following information: copyright notice,
short phrase (10 words), graphic image and URL. The network use provision in Section 15 is based on the “external
deployment” approach from the Open Source License (rather than the Affero approach) and requires that a
company that makes the software available over a network (such as providing service as an ASP) provide the source
code to persons who use such application over the network.

7. Q: I want to release my work under a different license. Can I do so?

A: No. You can only release your code under the GPL Version 2 or later compatible version for all derivative works
based on the Open Source Server software. Additionally, you must release your code under CPAL Version 1 for all
modifications to the Web Client or Community Zimlet.

ZIMBRA OPEN SOURCE EDITION LICENSE FAQ - Page 1

Zimbra
zimbra.com | 3000 Internet Blvd., Suite 200, Frisco, Texas 75034 © Copyright 2014 Zimbra, Inc. All rights reserved.
US 1.877.492.9484 | UK 44.203.178.3010
 ZIMBRA OPEN SOURCE
EDITION LICENSE FAQ

8. Q: The GPL requires that I distribute the “source code’ of my files. What does that mean?
A: The “source code” of a file means the format that is intended for people to edit. It has to be the file itself,
without any compression or obfuscation.

9. Q: What is a derivative work under the GPL?

A: Simply combining a copyrighted work with another work does not create a derivative work. The original
copyrighted work must be modified in some way. The resulting derivative work must itself “represent an original
work of authorship.” So if the work does not modify the original GPL-licensed program, but merely runs it, it is not
creating a derivative work.

10. Q: Do I have to give away my work to everyone?

A: Under the GPL v.2 if you make a derivative work and distribute it to someone else, you must provide that
person with the source code of that derivative work under the terms of the GPL so that they may modify and
redistribute it under the terms of the GPL as well. However, you are under no obligations to distribute the code to
anyone else. If you do not distribute the code but use it only within your organization, then you are not required to
distribute the code to anyone at all.
Under CPAL v.1, if the software is made available over a network such as allowing others other then you to use it,
you must provide the source code to persons who use such application over the network. In other words, if you
use the OS Community Zimlet or Web client, any modifications you make must be released to anyone who uses/
accesses the software. However, if you use the code internally you do not have to distribute the code to anyone.

11. Q: If I sell my code for a fee do I also have to make it available for free?
A: No. If someone pays you a fee and obtains a copy, they have the freedom to release the code to the public for
free. For example, someone could pay your fee and then put their copy on a web site for the general public.

12. Q: Do I have to license under the GPL or CPAL?

A: Yes. If your work qualifies as a derivate work under the GPL, you must license the work under GPL v.2 for the
Open Source Server software.
Additionally, you must license your work under the CPAL for any modifications made to the Web Client and
Community Zimlet. Note that this only applies to the source code and not to any data that is stored within a DB.

13. Q: I would like to link my proprietary code to the Open Source Server. Does that mean I GPL’ed my program? What
about the Web Client and Zimlet?
A: Yes. If you link your program to any GPL program, your program will also now be governed by the GPL. Under
CPAL v.1, you are able to link with the Web Client or Zimlet without having to use the CPAL license. However, any
modifications you make to the Web Client or Zimlet would be governed under the CPAL.

ZIMBRA OPEN SOURCE EDITION LICENSE FAQ - Page 2

Zimbra
zimbra.com | 3000 Internet Blvd., Suite 200, Frisco, Texas 75034 © Copyright 2014 Zimbra, Inc. All rights reserved.
US 1.877.492.9484 | UK 44.203.178.3010
 ZIMBRA OPEN SOURCE
EDITION LICENSE FAQ

14. Q: Can I use non GPL/CPAL code to make modifications?

A: It depends. If you are using non-free code you will need to gain permission from the copyright owners of the
program in order to use the code within the program. However, the code must be able to meet all of the GPL or
CPAL standards. We recommend consulting an attorney in order to avoid any issues with the copyright owner.
Accordingly, here is a link to view compatible licenses with the GPL.
(https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html)

15. Q: What does it mean to say that two licenses are “compatible”?
A: In order to combine two programs (or substantial parts of them) into a larger work, you need to have
permission to use both programs in this way. If the two programs’ licenses permit this, they are compatible. If
there is no way to satisfy both licenses at once, they are incompatible. Just installing two separate programs in the
same system, it is not necessary that their licenses be compatible because this does not combine them into a larger
work.

16. Q: What is the difference between “mere aggregation” and “combining two modules into one program”?
A: Mere aggregation of two programs means putting them side-by-side on the same hard disk. They remain
separate programs and not parts of a single program. In this case, if one of the programs is covered by the GPL/
CPAL, it has no effect on the other program.
Combining two modules means connecting them together so that they form a single larger program. If either part
is covered by the GPL, the whole combination must also be released under the GPL. If you are unable to do this,
you may not combine them.
What constitutes combing two parts into one program is a legal question viewed case by case. You should seek legal
advice to review your circumstance.

17. Q: If I add a module to the OS Server, do I have to use the GPL as the license for my module?
A: Yes. You can accept a contract to develop changes and agree not to release your changes until the client says ok.
This is permitted because in this case, no code is being distributed under the NDA.
You can release your changes to the client under the GPL/CPAL but agree not to release them to anyone else
unless the client says ok. In this case, too, no code is being distributed under an NDA, or under any additional
restrictions. The client would have the right to redistribute your version. However, the client is able to choose not
to exercise that right.

18. Q: Am I able to develop a modified version of the software under a nondisclosure agreement?
A: No. Any modified versions must carry all the freedoms stated in the GPL/CPAL. Thus, anyone who receives a
copy of your version from you has the right to distribute copies of that version. You may not distribute any version
of the work on a more restrictive basis.

19. Q: Am I allowed to distribute a modified or beta version under a NDA agreement?

A: No. Such a license would be self-contradictory and against both the GPL and CPAL.

ZIMBRA OPEN SOURCE EDITION LICENSE FAQ - Page 3

Zimbra
zimbra.com | 3000 Internet Blvd., Suite 200, Frisco, Texas 75034 © Copyright 2014 Zimbra, Inc. All rights reserved.
US 1.877.492.9484 | UK 44.203.178.3010
 ZIMBRA OPEN SOURCE
EDITION LICENSE FAQ

20. Q: Can I release a modified version of the OS Server in binary form only?
A: No. The whole point of the GPL is that all modified versions must be free software. This means that the source
code of the modified version is available to the users.

21. Q: I downloaded just the binary from the net. If I distribute copies, do I have to get the source and distribute that
too?
A: Yes. If you distribute binaries you must also distribute the complete corresponding source code too. There is an
exception for the case where you received a written offer for source code but is limited.

22. Q: What does “written offer valid for any third party” mean? Does that mean everyone in the world can get the
source of any GPL’ed program no matter what?
A: If you choose to provide through a written offer, then anybody who request the source from you is entitled to
receive it.
If you commercially distribute the binaries not accompanied with the source code, the GPL says you must provide
a written offer to distribute the source code later. When users non-commercially redistribute the binaries they
received from you, they must pass along a copy of this written offer. This means that people who did not get the
binaries directly from you can still receive copies of the source code, along with the written offer.

23. Q: I want to distribute binaries via physical media without accompanying sources. Can I provide source code by
FTP instead of by mail order?
A: You are supposed to provide the source code by mail-order on a physical medium if someone orders it. You are
welcome to offer people a way to copy the corresponding source code by FTP, in addition to the mail-order option,
but FTP access to the source is not sufficient to satisfy section 3 of the GPL.
When a user orders the source you have to make sure to get the source to that user. If a particular user can
conveniently get the source from you by anonymous FTP, that does the job. But not every user may be able to do
so. All users are entitled to get the source code from you.
If the FTP access is convenient it is possible no one will choose to mail-order a copy. But this may not always be the
case.
If you distribute binaries via FTP, you should distribute source via FTP as well.

24. Q: Is making and using multiple copies within one organization or company “distribution”?
A: No, in that case the organization is making the copies for itself. A company or other organization may develop a
modified version and use it for themselves without releasing that modified version to a third-party.
However, when the organization transfers copies to other organizations or individuals, this is distribution. In
particular, providing copies to contractors for use off-site is distribution.

ZIMBRA OPEN SOURCE EDITION LICENSE FAQ - Page 4

Zimbra
zimbra.com | 3000 Internet Blvd., Suite 200, Frisco, Texas 75034 © Copyright 2014 Zimbra, Inc. All rights reserved.
US 1.877.492.9484 | UK 44.203.178.3010
 ZIMBRA OPEN SOURCE
EDITION LICENSE FAQ

25. Q: Can I put the binaries on my Internet server and put the source on a different Internet site?
A: The GPL says you must offer access to copy the source code “from the same place.” However, you are allowed to
post the source code on another site and cross-reference that site on your Internet server. However, this does not
mean linking back to another site that happens to have the appropriate source code today. That site may change
the version or no longer host the source and therefore you would no longer be in compliance. Using sites like
Github would satisfy this requirement however.

26. Q: How can I make sure each user who downloads the binaries also gets the source?
A: You don’t have to make sure of this. As long as you make the source and binaries available so that the users can
see what’s available and take what they want, you have done what is required of you. It is up to the user whether
to download the source. The requirements for redistributors is intended to make sure the users can get the source
code, not to force users to download the source code even if they don’t want it.

27. Q: I want to distribute an extended version of the OS Server in binary form. Is it enough to distribute the source
for the original version?
A: No, you must supply the source code that corresponds to the binary. Corresponding source means the source
from which users can rebuild the same binary.

28. Q: Using programs under the GPL or CPAL does not work for us. Are there any additional options?
A: Yes there is! Zimbra offers network editions of all our open source software. These versions have additional
features and are not governed by the GPL or CPAL. You can see the full details and gain additional information
here http://www.zimbra.com/products/.

29. Q: Is it permitted for me to sell the Web Client, or Zimlet, or Server?

A: Yes. You are free to sell the Zimbra Open Source Edition however; you must distribute it under the GPL, for the
Open Source Server, and CPAL for the Web Client and Community Zimlet.

30. Q: I want to get credit for my work and want people to know what I wrote. How do I do that?
A: Under the GPL, you are able to write your own copyright notice. The GPL requires all copies of the work to
retain all copyright notices. Furthermore, the CPAL allows you to add your name as a contributor under Exhibit B
within the license agreement.

31. Q: Is it permitted for me to sell any extensions or modifications I made?

A: Yes. You can sell your own modifications however; you must distribute your modifications under the GPL, for
Server, or CPAL for Web Client and Community Zimlet. Refer to the above questions for more information.

32. Q: How is the CPAL different from the MPL?

A: One way the CPAL differs from the MPL is that the CPAL allows the original author to require that in derived
versions, when the program is initially run (or when a user begins a new session with an already-running instance
of the program), some kind of attribution be displayed.

ZIMBRA OPEN SOURCE EDITION LICENSE FAQ - Page 5

Zimbra
zimbra.com | 3000 Internet Blvd., Suite 200, Frisco, Texas 75034 © Copyright 2014 Zimbra, Inc. All rights reserved.
US 1.877.492.9484 | UK 44.203.178.3010
 ZIMBRA OPEN SOURCE
EDITION LICENSE FAQ

33. Q: Does Zimbra require attribution to be displayed?

A: Yes, Zimbra requires that the information set forth in Exhibit B to the CPAL be displayed.

34. Q: Why does Zimbra require this kind of attribution?

A: The CPAL allows the original author to require that an attribution of their role as the originator of the work be
displayed on the software’s user interface, and to specify what form this should take. Zimbra has chosen to require
attribution in order to recognize the work of the Zimbra developers and to prevent others who don’t want to give
prominent credit to Zimbra from simply cloning Zimbra’s software for their own use.

35. Q: What must be displayed under the CPAL?

A: In the case of Zimbra’s open source code licensed under the CPAL, you are required to display the following
information in bold:

Attribution Copyright Notice: Copyright (c) 2009-2014 Zimbra, Inc.

Attribution Phrase (not exceeding 10 words): Powered by Zimbra Open Source Edition

Attribution URL: http://www.zimbra.com

Graphic Image provided in the Covered Code as file: http://www.zimbra.com/_media/logos/zimbra_logo.png

36. Q: So, does this mean I have to place Zimbra’s logo on my graphical user interface?
A: Yes, CPAL allows Zimbra to require that the attribution include Zimbra’s logo on any graphical user interface
that accesses the Zimbra code.

37. Q: Are there any guidelines as to how Zimbra’s logo should be displayed?
Yes, the CPAL provides that the attribution should be prominently displayed and the size of the logo should be
consistent with the size of other elements of the attribution. We interpret this to mean that the size of Zimbra’s
logo should be consistent with the size of any other logos displayed in the graphical user interface.

38. Q: Can attribution in the source code files be waived?

A: No, attribution to the authorship of this software in the source code files cannot be waived under any
circumstances.

39. Q: Can attribution in the user interface be waived?

A: Attribution to the authorship of this software in the user interface in the form of labels and hyperlinks can be
waived only with permission of the original author.

40. Q: I have a question not answered here. What should I do?

A: If you have a general question about licensing or other legal issues, please post your question in the Zimbra
forums. If you have a question about your specific case, you may also contact us at contributions@zimbra.com.

ZIMBRA OPEN SOURCE EDITION LICENSE FAQ - Page 6

Zimbra
zimbra.com | 3000 Internet Blvd., Suite 200, Frisco, Texas 75034 © Copyright 2014 Zimbra, Inc. All rights reserved.
US 1.877.492.9484 | UK 44.203.178.3010