Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PROJECT REPORT
SUBMITTED TO:
PROF. RAJENDRA NARGUNDKAR
SUBMITTED BY:
GROUP 10 SEC- EF
TABLE OF CONTENTS-
Introduction
Research Objectives
Research Methodology
Sample Design
Field Work
Questionnaire
Analysis
T-test
Cluster Analysis
Factor Analysis
Discriminant Analysis
Findings
Limitations
INTRODUCTION-
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES-
SAMPLE DESIGN-
N= (1.96*0.67/0.1)^2= 172
FIELD WORK-
QUESTIONNAIRE-
ANALYSIS-
T-TEST ANALYSIS-
The t-test analysis was done to learn about the first objective of
assessing the shift towards herbal shampoos. We did the
analysis using Q9. And Q10.
H0 = There is no significant difference in the satisfaction level of
users of herbal and users of non-herbal shampoos.
H1 = There is significant difference in the satisfaction level of
users of herbal and users of non-herbal shampoos.
Group Statistics
UsingHerbal N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Satisfaction Uses Herbal 18 3.7222 .66911 .15771
Does not use herbal 74 3.8919 .73219 .08512
P value = 0.373
Confidence level taken = 95%
α=0.05
P> α
Therefore, the null hypothesis cannot be rejected. This implies
that there is no significant difference in the satisfaction level of
users of herbal and users of non-herbal shampoos.
CLUSTER ANALYSIS-
FACTOR ANALYSIS-
Communalities
Initial Extraction
Brand 1.000 .343
price 1.000 .679
volume 1.000 .714
packaging 1.000 .539
advertisement 1.000 .622
features 1.000 .590
friends 1.000 .371
doctor 1.000 .689
Extraction Method: Principal Component
Analysis.
Total Variance Explained
From the output, we can see in the above table that the three
factors extracted account for 56.826% of the information. We
further move onto the rotated component matrix to find out
what are the factors which are clubbed into the 3 factors.
Component Matrixa
Component
1 2 3
brand .152 -.554 .111
price .251 .609 -.495
volume .502 .137 -.666
packaging .592 -.416 .124
advertisement .734 -.283 -.049
features .448 .470 .410
friends .572 -.050 .205
doctor .212 .639 .485
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
a. 3 components extracted.
Eigenvalues
Canonical
Function Eigenvalue % of Variance Cumulative % Correlation
Function
Satisfaction 1 2
0 -1.139 .332
5 .116 -.124
10 1.415 .855
Classification Resultsa
Satisfaction 0 5 10 Total
Original Count 0 6 1 1 8
5 9 22 11 42
10 0 0 3 3
10 .0 .0 100.0 100.0
LIMITATIONS-