Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997

The
BOARDGAMER

Dedicated To
The Competitive Play Of
Avalon Hill / Victory Games
Board, Sports and Card Games
Featuring: Air Baron, 1776, History Of The World, Gettysburg ‘88,
Circus Maximus, TV Wars, Avaloncon and AREA News & Ratings
 2 The Boardgamer Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997

Current Specific Game AREA Ratings

Turning Point: Peloponnesian Wars Victory In The Pacific
December 4, 1996 18 Active Players December 4, 1996 111 Active Players
Stalingrad
December 4, 1996 27 Active Players 1. Frank Hamrick 1617 BD-B6 1. Alan Applebaum 2013 IKAF6
2. Evan Davis 1607 AB-A6 2. Michael Crowe 1950 CDI-5
1. James Doughan 1963 DE-B6 3. Roger Taylor 1572 AC-A6 3. Ray Freeman 1947 FHBD6
2. Bryon Stingley 1784 BD-B6 4. Mark Holley 1536 AB-A5 4. Timothy Proksch 1929 EH-D6
3. Ron Fedin 1748 BC-B6 5. Kevin McCarthy 1507 AB-A5 5. David Targonski 1922 IK-E5
4. Marvin Birnbaum 1674 BB-A5 6. David Lindsay 1502 AB-A6 6. Steve Packwood 1835 GJ-E6
5. Henry Jones 1601 BC-B6 7. Michael Spinella 1501 AB-A5 7. Michael Kaye 1800 CD-B6
6. Christopher Bodkin 1599 AC-A5 8. Orhan Omer 1500 AB-A6 8. Thomas Gregorio 1796 FICE5
7. Hank Burkhalter 1576 ACAA6 9. John Ellsworth 1500 AB-A5 9. Daniel Henry 1793 JLDF6
8. Tom Johnston 1574 AA-A5 10. Tom Johnston 1791 EG-E6
9. Michael Kaye 1566 AC-A6
10. Thomas Oleson 1533 AC-B6 The Russian Campaign 11. Edward O’Conner
12. Neil Moran
1780
1775
DD-B6
BB-A5
11. Rodney Robinson 1513 AA-A5 December 4, 1996 44 Active Players 13. Glenn Petroski 1754 NMEG6
12. Dennis Nicholson 1507 AB-A6 14. Bruce Kernan 1704 CB-B6
13. Neil Fedin 1504 AB-A5 1. Robert Beyma 2079 EFGC6
2. Robert Shurdut 2028 GHN-6 15. Kevin Kinsel 1699 BCD-6
14. Chris Sturzillo 1502 AB-A6 16. Gregory Hanson 1694 IK-E5
3. Alan Frappier 1995 EHE-5
4. J Michael Noel 1979 EEK-6 17. Michael Knautz 1692 GI-E6
Breakout: Normandy 5. Charles Sorbello 1959 BCGA6 18. Michael Ussery 1684 HJBF6
December 4, 1996 83 Active Players 6. Thomas Gregario 1922 GJIB6 19. Bill Thomson 1669 BDDA5
7. Jeffrey Martin 1891 IMK-5 20. Robert Kondracki 1636 DE-C6
1. James Doughan 1733 EE-B6 21. Karsten Engelmann 1634 BC-B6
2. Don Greenwood 1731 CE-B6 8. Timothy Greene 1873 GIKB6
9. Charles Jehlen 1695 BBB-5 22. Casey Adams 1617 AC-A6
3. Ron Fedin 1706 CE-B6 23. Max Zavanelli 1602 BE-B6
4. William Edwards 1688 BD-B6 10. James Eliason 1689 DGGB6
11. Ed Druckman 1677 BBB-6 24. Alan Tomaszewski 1593 BE-B6
5. Herbert Gratz 1631 BC-B6 25. Lance Ottman 1586 BCC-6
6. Michael Lazar 1629 BC-A5 12. Henry Lowood 1666 ABCA6
13. Jerry Cecchin 1632 AC-A6 26. Stephen Resman 1582 BCD-6
7. Rodney Robinson 1613 CE-B6 27. Kenneth Nied 1581 GJ-E6
8. Alan Applebaum 1607 BD-B6 14. Gary Dickson 1613 ABAB5
15. Allen Kaplan 1605 BD-B6 28. Robert Smith 1574 DF-C5
9. James Stenard 1596 BD-B6 29. Philip Rennert 1572 AA-B6
10. Steve Andriakos 1592 BD-B6 16. David Ketchum 1579 AAB-5
17. Mark Figge 1573 AAB-5 30. Vince Meconi 1571 EG-D6
11. Robert O’Conner 1591 AB--6 31. Chuck Kaplan 1566 CF-D6
12. Bryan Eshleman 1589 CE-B6 18. Forrest Pafenburg 1542 AC-B6
19. Tom Schwarwank 1536 AB-A6 32. Joe Dragan 1565 CC-B6
13. Hank Burkhalter 1589 BD-A6 33. Peter Lerch 1563 AC-A6
14. Murray Cowles 1571 AB-A5 20. Martin Musella 1535 AB-A6
21. William Scott 1535 AA-A6 34. John Sharp 1562 JMBE6
15. Paul Nied 1568 AC-A6 35. Robert Kircher 1560 AC-A6
16. James Eliason 1562 AC-A6 22. William Putnam 1535 AAA-5
23. Peter Pollard 1518 AB-A6 36. Paul Carlson 1557 ABB-6
17. Byron Stingley 1560 BD-B6 37. Phil VanWiltenberg 1552 BD-B6
18. Marvin Birnbaum 1537 BD-B6 24. Chuck Stapp 1502 AB-A6
38. Joel Klein 1546 AC-A6
19. Kenneth Nied 1537 AB-B6 39. Pierre Menard 1545 AB-B5
20. Matthew Fagan 1536 BC-B6 We The People 40. Robert Hamel 1542 FG-D6
21. David Newport 1535 AC-A5 December 4, 1996 15 Active Players
22. Dirk Naish 1535 AC-A5
23. John Grant, Jr. 1535 AA-A6 1. Roger Taylor 1605 AB—5 Afrika Korps
24. Brian Carr 1535 AA-A5 2. James Scott II 1575 JA—6 December 4, 1996 34 Active Players
25. Jeff Czerniak 1535 AA-A5 3. James Doughan 1536 AB—6
26. Caleb Cousins 1534 AB-A6 4. Scott Smith 1533 AB—5 1. Randy Heller 1975 GGLA6
27. George Young 1532 AA-A6 5. James Tracy 1532 AAA-6 2. Vince Meconi 1867 DHEA5
28. Dennis Nicholson 1531 AB-A5 6. John Selders 1531 AAA-6 3. Michael Crowe 1812 BDCA5
29. Mark Gutfreund 1527 CE-B6 7. George Seary 1500 AB—5 4. Joseph Beard III 1740 BDED6
30. David Long 1525 ACAA5 8. Bruce Wigdor 1500 AB—5 5. Michael Reffue 1730 CEFA6
31. Tom Johnston 1504 AB-A6 6. Phillip Evans 1668 AC-A5
7. Thomas Delaney 1643 DFJA5
32. David Wong 1500 AC-A5 Circus Maximus 8. Gregory Smith 1629 BEBB5
33. James Torkelson 1500 AC-A5 December 4, 1996 37 Active Players
34. Joseph Beard III 1500 AB-A5 9. Barry Smith 1627 BEAB5
10. Frank Piercel 1600 AA—5
1. Mark Yingling 1556 AH-B6
11. Mark Gutfreund 1543 BCBA5
Fifth Fleet 2. Mike Pantaleano, Sr. 1536 AG-A5
12. Michael Matthews 1538 AB-A5
December 4, 1996 14 Active Players 3. Brendan Crowe 1535 AE-A6
13. Robert Hahn 1535 AA-A5
4. Mike Pantaleano, Jr. 1532 AD-A5
1. James Eliason 1728 AC-B6 5. Tina Snarski 1525 AE-A6
2. Andrew Maly 1636 BC-B6 6. David Yingling 1507 AH-B6 Colonial Diplomacy
3. Jimmy Fleckenstein 1532 BD-C6 7. Steven Cameron 1504 AG-A5 December 4, 1996 8 Active Players
4. James Fleckenstein 1515 BD-C6 8. Philip Chilcote 1500 AF-B6
5. Thomas Juneau Jr. 1502 AC-A5 9. Doug Lefevre 1500 AG-A5 1. James Yerkey 1535 AD-A5
 The Boardgamer
Its been a busy three months here in
Minster, Ohio. I keep track of the
computer ratings for the local high
school football team, and since we
made the playoffs for the first time in the
last three years, these services were in
great demand. On the hobby front, I’ve
just finished GameMastering a History
Of The World ladder game on the Genie
network and finished playing a War At
Sea game against Ray Freeman on the
Virtual Wargamer’s HQ on the Internet.
Details of the History Of The World
PBEM ladder appear elsewhere in this
issue. The War At Sea game may
appear in a future issue of the
BOARDGAMER if it is an interesting
and competitive game. I would
encourage you to check it out if you are
online at the following address:
http://www.manzana.com
The War At Sea game is under the
PBEM/Computer games section and is
entitled “PBEM: WAR AT SEA”. Look
for a second game to be started by the
time you receive this issue.
For those of you who were on Genie
when it was at its height, be certain to
check out the Virtual Wargamer’s HQ.
This looks like It has the potential to be
just as good, if not better, and at no cost
other than your local Internet access
fees.
Speaking of Genie, the adminstrator of
the Games Round Table is quitting on
January 1st. This will probably sound
the final death knell of Genie as a place
for playing boardgames by email.
I also did something unusual for me and
took the time to learn most of the games
I purchased at Avaloncon. So far I’ve
learned Air Baron, Greed, We The
People and Stocks & Bonds. I’ve still
got TV Wars and Breakout: Normandy
to go. I also learned a few others before
Avaloncon, which means I’ve learned a
lot more than the 2-3 games a year I
normally average.
After Avaloncon I think I reached a point
where I needed to spend more time
gaming to keep myself sharp and to
keep from falling behind in the hobby. I
also hadn’t read many books in a while,
so I have read six or so in the last few
Volume 2, Issue 1
From The Editor
months. Unfortunately, this means I did
not spend a lot of time promoting the
BOARDGAMER. This is partially due to
spending time on these other pursuits,
and partially because I’ve run out of
good ideas as to how to get this done. If
any of you have any ideas, I would be
most appreciative if you could pass
them on.
That brings me to the other thing I did
not get done these three months. I have
not been real successful in hounding
people for articles. You will see the
result of this in that I actually wrote an
article for this issue. It is not the
dreaded Third Reich article that I’ve
been warning you about, but there is a
distinct danger that it may have to
surface next issue. That means I’ll have
to spend a lot of college basketball
season playtesting and writing the
article, which is not exactly what I had
planned. So please, do you part to help
out the BOARDGAMER and con
someone into sending in an article.
Some Random Hobby News
Avaloncon has been expanded to start
on Wednesday morning, instead of the
previous schedule which started on
Wednesday night. Wednesday is
expected to be full of heats from multi-
player events, and also some ‘mulligan’
r o u n d s o f v a r i o u s t wo - p l a y e r
tournaments. A mulligan round means
that if you win that game you can take a
bye in the first round of the actual
tournament. If you lose in the mulligan
round, you can start from scratch when
the actual tournament starts. It is a
good way to work out the rust before the
actual tournament getsstarted.
Also, on Wednesday night, a banquet
has been tentatively scheduled to honor
the Avaloncon Hall of Fame inductees.
The 1996 inductee is Bruce Reiff. You
may recognize Bruce as a past
contributor to the BOARDGAMER. He is
also a winner of numerous Avaloncon
tournaments and the driving force
behind the sports and leisure time
events at Avaloncon. My personal
attendance at the banquet depends on if
these are any interesting games going
on at that time (I can eat all year long, I
only get to play FTF games a few times
a year).
Continued on page 4.
January 1997 3
The BOARDGAMER
The BOARDGAMER is published by Bruce
Monnin. The BOARDGAMER is intended to
be a compilation of quality articles on the
strategy, tactics, and variants for a variety of
board, sports and card games.
Articles from contributors are considered for
publication at the discretion of the editor.
Rejected articles will be returned whenever
possible. Potential authors should be
advised that all outside submissions may not
have previously been submitted to other
publications unless permission has been
granted and The BOARDGAMER has been
notified. Articles may be reprinted
elsewhere, although the editor’s permission
is requested (and will usually be freely
given).
Unless otherwise mentioned, all game titles
mentioned are trademark names of The
Avalon Hill Game Company/Victory Games,
as is the GENERAL and Avaloncon.
EDITOR: Bruce A. Monnin
ADDRESS: 177 South Lincoln Street
Minster, OH 45865-1240
E-MAIL: MONNINB@BRIGHT.NET
PHONE: (419) 628-3332
Copyright 1997
Subscriptions
To The
BOARDGAMER
The BOARDGAMER is to be
published quarterly with mailings
near the beginnings of January,
April, July and October. Individual
issues are $3.50 each and a one
year (4 issue) subscription is $13.00
($12.00 for members of AHIKS).
Although the first few issues may be
sent by First Class mail, eventually
all domestic subscriptions will be
sent via bulk permit.
European deliveries require an extra
$2.00 per issue. Other overseas
and foreign deliveries require
a d d it io n a l p o sta g e c h ar g e s.
Contact the BOARDGAMER for
details:
The BOARDGAMER
177 South Lincoln Street
Minster, OH 45865-1240
(419) 628-3332
 4 The Boardgamer
Air Baron Series Replay
Basic Game
Partisan Leaders
For 1776
Event Cards
In History Of The World
Avaloncon 1996
Four Days of Fun, Competition and Fatigue
Late Returns
From Avaloncon 1996
Circus Maximus
Tips For Tournament Play
Sweeping The Sweeps
Strategy In The Ratings War Phase Of TV Wars
History Of The World
PBEM Ladder Rules
Pre-ASL AREA Recreation
Update October 1996
Pre-ASL AREA Records
Mid-November 1996
Gettysburg ‘88
A Union Opening Strategy
AREA News
Tournament
From The Editor (Cont.)
Continued from Page 3.
In AREA news, Glenn Petroski has
recently moved. Glenn has not moved
far, but the new address needs to be
noted for those of you sending in AREA
chits. Glenn’s new address is:
Glenn Petroski
6829 23rd Avenue
Kenosha, WI 53143-1233
(414) 654-5044
Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997
Inside This Issue
5
by The Quake Coast Game Club
10
by Jim Lawler
12
by Michael Anchors
15
by James Pei
17
by Avaloncon GM’s
18
by Bruce Monnin
21
by Michael Anchors
23
by Greg Courter
25
by Bill Thomson
26
by Bill Thomson
27
by Ray Freeman
28
by Glenn Petroski
Also of note for those who like to play on There is also a section for the
their computers, the BOARDGAMER BOARDGAMER available on the Virtual
has a new e-mail address. I can now be Wargamers HQ mentioned earlier in this
reached at: article. This is in the Magazine
Publishers area. Be sure to check it out,
MONNINB@BRIGHT.NET leave a note so I know you were there,
and please, state what you like, what
My Genie address is still active for now, you dislike and what needs improved in
but I will probably be shutting it down the BOARDGAMER. This input can
early in 1997. Please direct all email only help make a better product, and the
free publicity is always good, too.
correspondence to me at the bright.net
address.
 The Boardgamer
Air Baron Series Replay
The Quake Coast Game Club
Olympic Lines (Yellow) : Pete Stavish
Aero Flamingo (Green): Harry Jannsen
World Domain (Blue): Paul Horn
While this game does not exactly fit the
mold of the BOARDGAMER (it is not out
of print, and it will be receiving coverage
in the GENERAL, includ ing an
advanced game series replay in Volume
30, #6), according to all the talk in the
halls at Avaloncon it will be a popular
game, and thus of interest to many of
the BOARDGAMER’s readers. Besides,
I always like a series replay.
Just for clarification, this series replay
was played with Basic Game rules.
Avalon Hill's new game AIR BARON is
that rarest of birds--a leisure/family
game that can be enjoyed by wargame
players as well. However, in AIR
BARON the battlefield is not France or
the steppes of Russia, but New York,
Chicago, and Los Angeles--in fact, all
the major air hubs of the continental
United States. It's an all-out financial
war, in which players maneuver for the
best geographical locations, attack
enemy hubs (with dollars not bombs),
and set up defensive networks with
strategically placed foreign routes and
jumbo jets.
Although luck plays a large role in AIR
BARON, if you trust to your luck for a
victory, you will invariably find yourself
at the low end of the podium during the
medals ceremony. Instead, you've got
to plan ahead, form strategic goals, and
discover tactics to defeat your
opponents. In the replay that follows,
you will get some insight into how five
different players approached the game.
Although the replay does not list every
die roll, it is complete enough to allow
the reader to recreate the game.
Players are listed in play order. "FW"
stands for fare war; i.e., the player either
declared a fare war at the beginning of
his turn, or he remained in a fare war
from the previous turn. If there is no
"FW" notation, the player either took
himself out of the fare war he was in, or
he remained out. Profit draws are listed
using the three-character airport code.
If the draw paid a profit, the amount of
the payoff and player to whom it was
paid are listed after the code. Thus
Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997 5
Trans Toucans (Red): Jon Travers
Sky High Airlines (Orange): Stu Basker
Neutral Commentator: Charles Bahl
"DWT/5Y" means that the DWT profit Orange:
marker paid a $5 dollar profit to the Starting cash = 8. FW. DIA-BRM.
Yellow player. Purchases or takeovers Anchorage/Reno/Sacramento/(Portland)
are listed by airport name. A series of Blue:
spoke takeovers is separated by Starting cash = 9. FW. HOU-RNO.
slashes. If an spoke name is in (Omaha).
parenthesis, it means the takeover
attempt at that location failed. Turn 2
Red:
TURNS 1 - 3 LAX-BHM/1R. Norfolk.
Turn 1 Yellow:
Yellow: ATL/3R-ORF/1R. Providence.
Starting cash = 5. FW. PHX-DCA. Blue:
Columbus/Dayton. FW. DIA-SMF. Tucson/Albuquerque/
Red: El Paso.
Starting cash = 6. FW. SFO-CMH. Green:
Jacksonville/Birmingham/Nashville. JFK/3Y-ANC/1O. Memphis.
Green: Orange:
Starting cash = 7. FW. ORD-LAX. HOU-DTW/5Y. Omaha.
Oklahoma City/Tulsa/(Little Rock).
A Review Of Air Baron
by Charles Bahl
Air Baron is a highly addictive game of air empire building. Although the game is
simple to learn, it abounds in tricky strategies and ploys — enough to keep you
coming back again game after game.
The game board is a map of the United States divided into major air hubs (new
York, Chicago, Los Angeles, etc.). Radiating from each hub are smaller airport
spokes. A player wins the game by being the first person to have a combined total
of cash and market share greater than a certain fixed amount. Market share is
determined by the “dominance” or “control” of air hubs. If you own over half the
spokes of a hub, you dominate it; if you own all the spokes of a hub you control it.
Each hub you control or dominate increases your market share. For example, if
you dominate the Chicago hub, your market share increases by 120.
During a turn each player randomly draws two Profit Markers (there is one Profit
Marker for each spoke and each hub). Each player who owns a drawn spoke
collects a fixed profit. However, if the player happens to be engaging in a fare war
at the moment his spoke is drawn, he receives nothing.
After the profit draw, a player can either purchase a single unowned spoke or
attempt a takeover of one or more spokes — both owned and unowned. In a
takeover attempt of a spoke owned by another player, both the “attacker” and the
“defender” roll dice to determine the winner. The die rolls are adjusted by various
modifiers. For example, if the attacker is in a fare war he adds 2 to his roll; if the
defender controls the hub (i.e., owns all of the hub’s spokes), he adds 1 to his roll.
A player’s most important decision is whether or not to engage in a fare war. A fare
war gives a player a significant advantage in a string of takeover attempts, but it
also forces him to forgo profits when he possibly needs them the most. The game
is usually exciting up to the very end, as players jockey for a strong geographical
position from which to launch a final, game-winning set of takeovers. Often times a
player who begins the game in a seemingly hopeless position can pull off a
stunning victory at the very last second.
 6 The Boardgamer Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997

Air Baron Series Replay (Cont.)

Turn 3 This will allow me another growth spurt End Of Turn 3
Blue: in Turn 4.
MIA-TUC/1B. San Antonio. Green is the major threat. A shortage of
Red: Green: I selected Dallas as my home cash, however, will force Green out of fare
wars for at least one turn. His defense of
SAT/2B-ELP/2B. Indianapolis. turf for one big reason: It's cheap! Dallas will be difficult.
Orange: Since I started the game with $7, I
ATL/10R-DFW/12G. Pass. theoretically could have gained San Francisco (SFO) Orange (D)
Green: complete controlled of the hub in one Seattle (SEA) None
FW. JFK/3Y-DTW/5Y. Little Rock/ turn. Of course the dice had other Anchorage (ANC) Orange
Cleveland/Milwaukee/Austin/ ideas. I had to buy Memphis outright in Sacramento (SMF) Orange
New Orleans. Turn 2. Luckily the Dallas hub paid me Reno (RNO) Orange
Yellow: $12 before my portion of Turn 3, and I Portland (PDX) None
FW. LAX-TUL. Baltimore/ was able to launch a very successful Los Angeles (LAX) None
Raleigh-Durham/Pittsburgh. takeover blitz ending with control of Honolulu (HNL) None
Dallas, dominance in Houston, and two San Diego (SAN) None
Las Vegas (LAS) None
Yellow: If given the chance, I like to bombs dropped in Cleveland and
start the game with a move to acquire Milwaukee to keep both Yellow and Red Phoenix (PHX) Blue (C)
the Detroit hub. Detroit provides a solid on their toes. Although I occupy a Tucson (TUS) Blue
beginning base that allows later strong geographical position, I am cash El Paso (ELP) Blue
Albuquerque (ABQ) Blue
takeover attempts against both of the poor going into Turn 4. Depending on
superhubs: Chicago and New York. (I player order in the next turn, I could Denver (DIA) None
call them superhubs because both of suffer a significant counterattack from Salt Lake City (SLC) None
them yield Market Shares of 120.) Red. Kansas City (MCI) None
Omaha (OMA) Orange
However, because I started the game
with only $5, it will take me more than Orange: Turn 1 went well, then the Dallas - Ft. Worth (DFW) Green (C)
one turn to establish complete control in bottom dropped out. Since the San Tulsa (TUL) Green
Detroit. Since I had no income in Turn Francisco hub did not pay off, I found Oklahoma City (OKC) Green
Little Rock (LIT) Green
2, I spent my left over buck on a myself virtually penniless. After I picked Memphis (MEM) Green
foothold (Providence) in the New York up Omaha in Turn 2, there was nothing
hub. By the time Turn 3 rolled around, I left for me to do in Turn 3 except pass. Houston (HOU) Green (D)
was cash rich. Green already holds a Austin (AUS) Green
San Antonio (SAT) Blue
spoiler in Cleveland to prevent my Blue: After my complete failure with the New Orleans (MSY) Green
complete control of Detroit. I could have Denver hub in Turn 1, I turned toward
challenged him, of course, with a take Phoenix and staged a coup. I'm a little Chicago (ORD) None
Minn - St. Paul (MSP) None
over attempt there, but decided instead afraid of what Green might do to me, but
St. Louis (STL) None
on an assault on the Washington hub, I hope he'll turn his attention to the Indianapolis (IND) Red
which I succeeded in dominating. easier and more profitable pickings to Milwaukee (MKE) Green
Alt hough dom inance of bot h the east. I'm sure I'll come into conflict
Detroit (DTW) Yellow (D)
Washington and Detroit have given me with Orange sooner or later, but for now
Dayton (DAY) Yellow
a larger Market Share than if I controlled his poor cash position will give me some Columbus (CMH) Yellow
Detroit alone, I hope I haven't spread breathing space to improve my holdings Cleveland (CLE) Green
myself too thin. My defensive position is and my defensive position.
Atlanta (ATL) Red (D)
none too strong. Cincinnati (CVG) None
NEUTRAL COMMENTARY Nashville (BNA) Red
Red: I decided to start with Atlanta Everybody dives right in: fare wars all Birmingham (BHM) Red
mainly to give Yellow a hard time in the around. This is a very common sight to Jacksonville (JAX) Red
east. I have learned through experience see on Turn 1. No one wants to get Charlotte (CLT) None
that an unchallenged "Detroit player" is squeezed out early. However, as Green Miami (MIA) None
a very dangerous opponent indeed! and Blue found out, it is not without its Tam - St. Pete (TPA) None
Much like Yellow, lack of funds in Turn 2 risks. (A +2 dice-roll modifier is not a W. Palm Beach (PBI) None
forced me to purchase a cheap foothold sure thing after all.) The risk is to put up Orlando (MCO) None
in the Washington hub (Norfolk). Such too much of your starting capital and Washington (DCA) Yellow (D)
cheap routes often can come in handy then lose it on your first dice roll. Not Pittsburgh (PIT) Yellow
later. Either they can give you the edge only will you be short of cash in the Raleigh - Durham (RDU) Yellow
in a hub-takeover attempt, or they can coming round, you will be a turn behind Norfolk (ORF) Red
simply be a defensive bastion against in the spoke-buying rush. In order to Baltimore (BWI) Yellow
an opponent when he tries a takeover. minimize your risk, I suggest a New York (JFK) None
Unfortunately, by Turn 3 I was still conservative approach. Make sure you Syr - Albany (SYR) None
broke. I was forced to settle for another select some inexpensive spokes for Buf - Roch (BUF) None
inexpensive spoiler: Indianapolis. your first foray into an air war. This way, Philadelphia (PHL) None
Luckily by the end of the turn I received if you lose a takeover bid on your first or San Juan (SJU) None
Providence (PVD) Yellow
a $10 windfall from the Atlanta hub. second dice roll, you will still have Boston (BOS) None
enough cash to make a come back in
 The Boardgamer
Air Baron Series Replay (Cont.)
Turn 2. Both Blue and Green were
smart enough to recognize this fact.
Although Blue lost his very first takeover
attempt, it only cost him a buck. With
eight dollars left in his pocket for the
beginning of Turn 2, he didn't have
much of a problem. Of course he was
forced to take an aggressive stance and
stay in the fare war. Luckily, the fates
were with him. Green, too, was only
temporarily stalled in his attack on the
Dallas hub. Green was smart to pull
himself out of a fare war, however, and
simply to buy dominance of Dallas with
the purchase of Memphis. With only
four dollars socked away, it was
pointless for Green to remain in the
trenches. Of course it would have been
nice if Green had pulled an earlier berth
in the play order. C'est la guerre.
Especially when you are in a fare war,
you need to look ahead and manage
your money efficiently. Make sure you
leave yourself enough money to operate
during the following turn. Since your
position in the play order is random, you
may not be able to take yourself out of a
fare war soon enough to give you a
decent shot at profits in the following
turn. Plan ahead. Or should I say
"plane ahead"?
By the end of Turn 3, the battle lines
have been clearly drawn. It looks like a
crucial battle is in the offing east of the
Mississippi. To me the most interesting
hub in the game is Detroit. Whoever
controls Detroit has the edge in the
eventual takeover of New York. Of
course, New York's control represents a
giant step forward toward winning the
game. As a result, the other players
have to work together to make sure the
Detroit player does not get his money-
grubbing hands on Chicago too. If they
fail, the game is essentially over. Many
times the battle for Chicago turns out to
be the game's Waterloo. Although
Green's Dallas hub looks strong (and
profitable), he has to be careful. The
fact that it has three "1-spokes" makes it
very easy for an opponent to attack it
during a fare war.
TURNS 4 - 6
Turn 4
Blue:
FW. JAX/1R-DFW. Oklahoma City/
(Tulsa).
Orange:
ATL/10R-SFO/7O. Seattle.
Volume 2, Issue 1
Yellow:
PIT/7Y-BHM/1R. Norfolk.
Green:
LIT/1G-OHM/1O. Pass.
Red:
FW. PHX-SMF/2O. Cincinnati/
Charlotte/Norfolk/Raleigh-Durham.
Turn 5
Blue:
BHM-ELP/2B. Pass.
Red:
JAX/1R-RDU/4R. W. Palm Beach.
Yellow:
SFO/7O-ANC/1O. Pass.
Green:
DIA/1O-IND/2R. Pass.
Orange:
FW. SEA/DTW/5Y. Portland/
Salt Lake City/Kansas City.
Turn 6
Orange:
AUS/2G-SAT/2B. Pass.
Green:
CVG/4R-RDU/4R. Pass.
Blue:
ORF/1R-ELP.2B. Las Vegas.
Yellow:
FW. JFK-SLC/5O. Cleveland.
Red:
FW. ABQ/2B-SEA/7O.
Tampa Bay-St. Petersburg/Orlando.
Yellow: Green's spoiler in Cleveland
has really hurt me. Not until Turn 6 was
I able to get enough cash and a
favorable attacking advantage to bump
him out of there. As it stands now,
however, although I am a long way from
victory, at least I occupy a strong
defensive position. Nobody can get at
me directly without coming through
Washington, Chicago, or New York.
What scares me the most right now is a
possible invasion of JFK via Miami by
the Big Red One. It might have been a
good play on my part to have purchased
West Palm Beach in order to thwart
Red's designs. On the other hand,
without Cleveland and total control of
the Detroit hub I would stand almost no
chance at all.
Red: My $10 profits on Turn 3 put me in
a great position to attack. The first goal
was to sew up Atlanta and then remove
Yellow's dominance of the Washington
hub. A lucky string of four consecutive
takeovers gave me all I could ask for.
And my luck just kept rollin' in Turn 5,
whose profit marker draws brought me
January 1997 7
another $7 and put me in a position to
secure the Miami hub as well in Turn 6.
At this point in the game, not only am I
ahead, but I'm in the best position to
keep up the attack. During the next
three turns, I hope to stage a successful
raid on New York. Success in the Big
Apple should give me the game. My
closest competitor is Orange. It's good
for me that he is far enough away not to
pose an immediate threat. I won't
dispute his impending takeover of
Chicago.
Green: Not going anywhere. (Three
passes in a row.) I see the problem with
Dallas now. Although it is cheap, it is
also very vulnerable to attack. Once
Blue grabbed Oklahoma City, my
potential earning power dropped
significantly. No money, no nothing.
Orange: A series of good profit draws
has improved my outlook tremendously,
allowing me control of not only San
Francisco but also Denver. Currently I
look like Red's only real opponent, and
the burden is going to fall on me to stop
him. However, my position, I believe, is
somewhat weaker than his. First, he
only needs New York or Chicago to
hammer the last nail into this game's
coffin, whereas I will need to take both
Chicago and one other hub--both very
costly propositions. Second, his
earnings capability is better than mine.
If somebody pulls the Atlanta marker
when Red is out of a fare war, I might as
well kiss my chances good-bye. Red
does have one significant disadvantage:
He is presently in a fare war. If he stays
in a fare war he won't have enough
money to capture Chicago; if he gets out
of the fare war, he will have to delay his
attack on Chicago by at least one turn.
In either case, I should be able to take
over the Windy City hub before he does.
Blue: My attack on Green hurt him a lot.
I only wish I could say that it helped me
as much. I can't complain about my
income over the last three turns. It's
been about average, I think. But trying
to break into Los Angeles is extremely
costly. My only hope is that Orange will
be distracted long enough by Chicago
and his rivalry with Red. That may give
me the opportunity I need to takeover
LAX. Otherwise, I'll just be sitting here
in Phoenix when the lights go out.
 8 The Boardgamer Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997

Air Baron Series Replay (Cont.)

End Of Turn 6 NEUTRAL COMMENTARY TURNS 7 - 9
Everybody starts staking their claims. Turn 7
Both Orange and Red are poised to make Invariably there are winners and losers. Blue:
major moves: Orange into Chicago and Red
During these central turns, the game MCO-MKE/2G. Pass.
into New York.
usually takes one of two possible Orange:
San Francisco (SFO) Orange (C) directions: either it becomes very SLC/5O-OKC/1B. Minneapolis-St. Paul.
Seattle (SEA) Orange contentious with multiple players fighting Yellow:
Anchorage (ANC) Orange it out within some of the hubs, or else BHM-LAX/3B. San Juan.
Sacramento (SMF) Orange the game settles into a more static Green:
Reno (RNO) Orange a r r a n g em en t wi t h ea c h p l ay er FW. BWI/4Y-MSY. (Birmingham).
Portland (PDX) Orange controlling his own hub or hubs. Red:
Los Angeles (LAX) None Obviously, this replay falls into the FW. SAT/2B-PHX/10B.
Honolulu (HNL) None second category. In this case, the Syracuse-Albany/Buffalo-Rochester.
San Diego (SAN) None players are trusting in luck to improve
Las Vegas (LAS) Blue their condition. At this point in the Turn 8
Phoenix (PHX) Blue (C) game, for example, a lucky profit draw Red:
Tucson (TUS) Blue can propel either Orange or Red into a OMA/1O-RDU/4R. Pass.
El Paso (ELP) Blue quick victory. Blue:
Albuquerque (ABQ) Blue FW. CMH/2Y-IND/2R. Austin/
Denver (DIA) Orange (C) Although the first three game turns (New Orleans).
Salt Lake City (SLC) Orange favored Green and Yellow, early attacks Green:
Kansas City (MCI) Orange by their opponents brought them both ANC/1O-JFK/3R/3Y. Pass.
Omaha (OMA) Orange
up short. Now that Red and Orange Yellow:
Dallas - Ft. Worth (DFW) Green (D) dominate the board, it will also be up to OKC-LAS. Philadelphia.
Tulsa (TUL) Green the others to try to stop them. For Orange:
Oklahoma City (OKC) Blue example, it's up to Yellow now to put the ATL/21R-MCO/7R. St. Louis.
Little Rock (LIT) Green
brakes to the Red juggernaut.
Memphis (MEM) Green
Unfortunately, Yellow is cash poor. If a Turn 9
Houston (HOU) Green (D) good profit comes his way in Turn 7, his Blue:
Austin (AUS) Green best bet will be to purchase the FW. SFO/15O-SMF/2O. New Orleans/
San Antonio (SAT) Blue
New Orleans (MSY) Green
expensive spokes radiating from JFK Birmingham.
(e.g., Boston and/or Philadelphia). Red:
Chicago (ORD) None Yellow made one crucial mistake in Turn FW. PHL/6Y-MSP/8O. Birmingham/
Minn - St. Paul (MSP) None 6. He should have taken advantage of Baltimore/Pittsburgh/Boston/Columbus.
St. Louis (STL) None
Indianapolis (IND) Red
his fare war to pick up either Buffalo- Orange:
Milwaukee (MKE) Green Rochester or San Juan. Ownership of FW. CLT-TUL/1G. Milwaukee/
either one of these spokes would have Indianapolis/Tulsa/Little Rock/
Detroit (DTW) Yellow (C) made Red's conquest of New York Memphis/Oklahoma City.
Dayton (DAY) Yellow
Columbus (CMH) Yellow
extremely difficult. Without that extra
Cleveland (CLE) Yellow spoke, Yellow will be fighting an uphill At the end of his turn, Orange's total
battle. exceeds $320. He is declared the
Atlanta (ATL) Red (C)
winner.
Cincinnati (CVG) Red
Nashville (BNA) Red Orange, of course, is drooling over the
Birmingham (BHM) Red Windy City. But he must think over Green: I was never a viable force in this
Jacksonville (JAX) Red carefully whether he should attempt a game. Blue's early attack against my
Charlotte (CLT) Red fare war in Turn 7. He does not Dallas hub set me so far back that I was
Miami (MIA) Red (C) currently have enough money to win unable to recover. I spent the whole of
Tam - St. Pete (TPA) Red dominance in a single turn, but he can the game trying to scrape together a few
W. Palm Beach (PBI) Red scarcely afford to delay and yield the bucks. Dallas, although tempting to
Orlando (MCO) Red hub to Red. His best bet may simply be snatch up as a starting base, is
Washington (DCA) None to take himself out of the war, buy St. essentially indefensible. I don't think it
Pittsburgh (PIT) Yellow Louis or Minneapolis-St. Paul, and hope was any coincidence that Orange won
Raleigh - Durham (RDU) Red for some good profits. the game with a final attack on its
Norfolk (ORF) Red crumbling fortifications. With three "1
Baltimore (BWI) Yellow Green's woes go without saying. But spokes" it fell without much of a fight.
New York (JFK) None Blue is a little more interesting. With
Syr - Albany (SYR) None luck he can buy an LA spoke or two Yellow: It looks like I really blew a good
Buf - Roch (BUF) None over the next three turns. This would start. Since I didn't begin the game with
Philadelphia (PHL) None give him a good base to work from. He enough money to completely control
San Juan (SJU) None may be running out of time, however. Detroit, I probably should have taken
Providence (PVD) Yellow
His best hope lies in an extended game, over Cleveland right away and left either
Boston (BOS) None
where neither Red nor Orange achieves Dayton or Columbus for later. It took
a quick victory. me too long to raise the $6 needed to
 The Boardgamer Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997 9

Air Baron Series Replay (Cont.)

attack Cleveland after it had fallen into pretty pathetic early turns. Finally, with End Of Turn 9
the hands of Green. For the rest of the the acquisition of Denver, my empire
game I never received a large enough had reached critical mass, and I just Position at game’s end. Red’s neglect of the
Chicago hub gives Orange a surprisingly
income to seriously challenge Red. need to bide my time until I had enough
swift victory.
money to make an effective blitz.
Blue: Orange snuck up on all of us. I San Francisco (SFO) Orange (C)
have to share a measure of the blame. NEUTRAL COMMENTARY Seattle (SEA) Orange
After Orange received $17 during my A cautionary tale. Check for the worst- Anchorage (ANC) Orange
part of Turn 9, I should have seen the case scenario. Orange's sudden game- Sacramento (SMF) Orange
handwriting on the wall. But I was too ending strike seemed to come out of Reno (RNO) Orange
focused on Red at that point to think nowhere. It certainly caught this Portland (PDX) Orange
straight. I didn't figure out that with one commentator napping, along with the Los Angeles (LAX) None
more lucky profit draw, Orange was in a r es t o f t h e p l a y er s -- i n cl u d i ng , Honolulu (HNL) None
position to sweep. If I had attacked the apparently, Orange himself. Although San Diego (SAN) None
Denver hub, I might have been able to Orange was certainly an important Las Vegas (LAS) Blue
stop him. I think I really might have had contender from about Turn 5 or so, it Phoenix (PHX) Blue (C)
a chance in this game if I could have didn't seem possible for him to carry out Tucson (TUS) Blue
stretched it out for another three turns or such a swift victory march across the El Paso (ELP) Blue
so. continent. In hindsight it would have Albuquerque (ABQ) Blue
been better for Red to aim his guns at Denver (DIA) Orange (C)
Red: This was my game to lose. And I Chicago, but I can hardly fault him for Salt Lake City (SLC) Orange
did! Obviously, I was blinded by the not doing so. From my perspective, Kansas City (MCI) Orange
Omaha (OMA) Orange
glitter of New York. I didn't recognize Red was almost a sure win in New York
that Chicago in this situation was the by no later than Turn 11, while I figured Dallas - Ft. Worth (DFW) Orange (C)
more important city. By concentrating that it would take Orange until at least Tulsa (TUL) Orange
my attack on Chicago, I would have Turn 12, if not longer, to grab both Oklahoma City (OKC) Orange
Little Rock (LIT) Orange
forced Orange to go after Los Angeles. Chicago and Dallas. Apparently, Red
Memphis (MEM) Orange
Even with his very potent cash position, had similar thoughts.
Orange did not have enough strength to Houston (HOU) Blue (C)
capture LA in a single turn. Although I Orange makes a good point about hub Austin (AUS) Blue
San Antonio (SAT) Blue
did not have the money to capture control. Own a hub and your game is New Orleans (MSY) Blue
Chicago right away, a takeover run never a lost cause. With a hub you may
there would have probably bought me just sit there for a number of turns Chicago (ORD) Orange (C)
enough time to win the game in a later twiddling your thumbs, but eventually Minn - St. Paul (MSP) Orange
St. Louis (STL) Orange
turn. somebody will pull your hub marker and Indianapolis (IND) Orange
you will be on your way. This was Milwaukee (MKE) Orange
Orange: Red did blow it, but it also took especially true in this particular game
some fantastic luck on my part as well. since Orange controlled San Francisco, Detroit (DTW) Yellow (D)
Dayton (DAY) Yellow
After all, $32 in the last three game a hub which, apparently, none of the Columbus (CMH) Red
turns is nothing to sneeze at. (Not to other players were interested in. Cleveland (CLE) Yellow
mention winning some very tight dice
Atlanta (ATL) Red (C)
rolls.) In any case, a rather slow start One final note. In this game foreign
Cincinnati (CVG) Red
turned out great. I think that as long as hubs, jumbos, and SSTs were not used Nashville (BNA) Red
you hold on to the control of at least one by any of the players. Normally, players Birmingham (BHM) Red
decent hub (San Francisco barely will buy a few of the cheaper foreign Jacksonville (JAX) Red
qualifies) you are never completely out routes to protect their domestic hubs, or Charlotte (CLT) Red
of the game. If you don't control a hub, they will purchase a jumbo or two to Miami (MIA) Red (C)
you are essentially dead. Green in this fortify their key spokes. However, Tam - St. Pete (TPA) Red
game is a good case in point. It also during this game, money remained tight W. Palm Beach (PBI) Red
helped that I did not run into stiff and the takeover opportunities were Orlando (MCO) Red
competition. First of all, San Francisco generally plentiful. The players, Washington (DCA) Red (C)
was a long way from what seemed to be therefore, were always more eager to Pittsburgh (PIT) Red
the center of the action--the east coast. attack their brothers than to defend Raleigh - Durham (RDU) Red
Nobody was paying much attention to themselves. In a six-player game, Norfolk (ORF) Red
me. Second, Blue left me alone, however, there are fewer hubs to go Baltimore (BWI) Red
deciding to focus on Texas and Green's around. With fewer hubs, players are New York (JFK) None
holdings in this part of the country. usually more open to spending money Syr - Albany (SYR) Red
Blue's approach made sense, because on defense. This is particularly true Buf - Roch (BUF) Red
the pickings were definitely easier there. when using the Advanced Rules, which Philadelphia (PHL) Yellow
He had little to gain in staging a strike permit jumbos and SSTs to be San Juan (SJU) Yellow
Providence (PVD) Yellow
against San Francisco. However, my relocated.
Boston (BOS) Red
relative isolation left me free to build up
possessions slowly even during some
 10 The Boardgamer Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997

Partisan Leaders
For 1776
by Jim Lawler
The rules listed in this article are irregulars, were the only effective Troops:
intended to be used in the overall fighting forces left in the south after Any Rebel or Tory militia or Indian units
framework of rules that were printed in Benjamin Lincoln surrendered his army accompanying a Partisan Leader are
the General Vol. 25, No. 4, in my article and the city of Charleston in May of considered Partisans.
"Command Pressures" Leaders for 1780.
1776. They were developed after I sent Partisan Leaders can lead a maximum
in my first draft to Avalon Hill and the The British also developed effective of Three total strength points, a
article went to print before the Partisan Leaders. Joseph Brant (Chief maximum of Two strength points if
information on Partisans could be Thayendanegea) and Sir John Johnson dragoons are present (both strength
added. You will have to create your led allied American Indian forces points may be dragoons).
own counters for the Partisan Leaders. throughout the war terrorizing up state
Using blank counters they should follow New York and Pennsylvania, forcing Partisan Leaders may never lead
the design that Avalon Hill used for the Washington in 1778 to expend scarce regular troops. They may accompany
leader counters that were inserted into resources and send General John regular troops but have no effect on
the General Vol. 25, No 2. I like green Sullivan and four regiments of New York combat. Partisan leaders are subject to
counters for the American partisans and Continentals to counter their threat. leader casualties after they participate in
orange for the Tories, but use what you (See Scenario 5, Tory and Indian combat.
have available. Campaign). British officers, Banaster
Tarl et on a nd Patri ck Fur gu so n Individual Partisan Leader Rules
On each side of the American developed into very effective leaders of
Revolution, there emerged men who Tory Militia in both theaters of the war. Francis Marion: The Swamp Fox
possessed that special knack for leading may move through one area of swamp
irregular forces. These men had the Partisan Leader Rules terrain each turn expending only one
unique leadership skills that enabled movement point.
them to effectively lead local militia Movement:
forces against well trained regular units. Partisans tended to stay close to their Patrick Furguson: He is the only
Partisans were used effectively by both home terrain and move quickly, as they partisan leader that may lead British
sides in both the Northern and Southern were not bogged down with much heavy Regulars. When Furguson is leading
theaters of the war. They had a larger equipment. Partisan leaders will be British Regulars, he functions as a
effect in the south mainly because of the permitted to lead their forces 10
relatively small population, and size of m ovem ent
the Regular Units operating in that points rather Leader Rules For Montcalm & Wolfe
theater, to land ratio in the south. than the 1776 Scenario
standard 8
Ethan Allen and Seth Werner led the m ovem ent Order Combat
Green Mountain boys and captured Fort points. French Rank Of Rank Effect Position
Ticonderoga and Crown Point in May of
1775. Werner led the Green Mountain Because they Montcalm ** 1 +2 Quebec
boys later that year as they joined mainly lead Bourlmaque * 1 +1 Ft. Ticonderoga
General Montgomery in his invasion of militia, Partisan Levis * 2 +1 Montreal
Canada. John Stark and Seth Werner leaders will be Bougainville * 3 +2 Quebec
won the battle of Bennington and were restricted to Leader A * 0 +0 Ft. Ticonderoga
instrumental in winning the Saratoga ei t h er the
Order Combat
campaign. Northern or
English Rank Of Rank Effect Position
Southern map
In the South, the legendary Swamp Fox, board. No
Amhearst ** 1 +1 Albany
Francis Marion, and Charles Summer's Am er i ca n
Wolfe ** 2 +2 AAAA45
Partisan Leader
Prideaux ** 3 +1 Albany
1776 may
Canada
ent er
after
Monckton * 1 +1 AAAA45
December 4, 1996 17 Active Players Townshead * 2 +1 AAAA45
1776. If any
Leader A * 0 +0 Albany
1. Steven Packwood 2011 EG-C6 P a r t i s a n
Leader B * 0 +0 Fort Edward
2. Michael Sincavage 1863 DE-C6 leaders with or
Rodgers * 0 +2 Albany
3. Mark Miklos 1821 EF-D6 without their
4. Rod Coffey 1648 AB-A6 militia leave Special Rules:
5. James McAden 1570 ABA-5 their area of 1) Amhearst can only move 5 MP and may not force march
6. Nathan Kilbert 1515 AB-A5 play, they are 2) Prideaux must lead the forces that march to Niagara if any
7. Robert Jamelli 1504 AC-B6 removed from choose to go
8. John Barrett 1501 AA-A6 the game. 3) Rodgers can only lead British Colonial forces
9. Charles Ryder 1500 AB-A5
 The Boardgamer Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997 11

Partisan Leaders For 1776 (Cont.)

British leader, not a partisan leader. Scenario 6: Lincoln's Southern Camp. I understand that unless you have and
Furguson has no movement restrictions, Watson Replace Leader C save your old Generals you may not
he may move anywhere on the map with Tory have access to some of the scenarios
board. Reinforcements listed. Anyone wishing a copy of any of
Sumter Replace Leader A these scenarios can get a Xerox by
Daniel Morgan and Benedict Arnold at Hillsboro writing to me at:
for the Continentals and Banister Marion with Rebel Militia Jim Lawler
Tarleton for the British were excellent Reinforcements in 51 Eric Lane
leaders of militia forces and may lead South Carolina New Hyde Park, N.Y. 10040
militia without the -1 combat penalty, (516)352-8939
(listed in the Leaders Rules in the Scenario 7: The British Dilemma
General) but they are not considered Brant Painted Post I hope this gives you a reason to dust off
partisan leaders. Ferguson New York your old copy of 1776. It is a great
Stark Ft. Ticonderoga game and the leaders just add to the
Retreat before Combat: Werner Norwich fun. Just ignore the Tactical Cards
When an enemy force enters a hex that when playing solitaire.
contains only an enemy partisan force, Campaign Game & Short Campaign #2
combat is not automatic. The player of Brant Any Indian Village If any of you have written or are aware
the partisans has the option to attempt April 76 of any other 1776 scenarios, I would
to retreat before combat. On a die roll Johnson Any Indian Village appreciate you sending them along. I
of 5 or 6, the partisans may retreat to Oct. 76 also would not mind a couple of PBM
any surrounding hex unoccupied by Ferguson With Tarleton April 77 opponents for 1776. I have a simple
opposing forces enemy units. Watson Appears anywhere in PBM system I have used for years.
South Carolina the
Partisan Leaders: interphase after
North
British (CE)
5 BR appear in
either Carolina
1997 Midwest Open
Joseph Brant +1 Marion& Appears anywhere in Victory In The Pacific
Sir John Johnson +1 Sumter Deep South at Tournament
American (CE) interphase after
Seth Werner +2 5 BR appear This two day, six-round Swiss style
John Stark +1 anywhere in the Victory in the Pacific tournament will be
South South held in Kenosha, WI from March 1-2,
British (CE) Stark Norwich April 76 1997. This tournament drew 29
John Watson +1 Warner Norwich April 76 competitiors from 12 states last year,
Patrick Furguson +2 and was widely acclaimed to have been
American (CE) Short Campaign #3 a great success.
Francis Marion +2 Brant Unadilla
Thomas Sumter +2 Ferguson New York Prizes for the event include a plaque
Johnson Oswego and $100 cash for first place, a plaque
Partisan Order of Appearance: Watson Augusta and $50 for second, a plaque and $20
Stark Norwich or third; plus the Halsey award (plaque
Scenario 1: Invasion on Canada Warner Ft. Ticonderoga and $10) for best Allied play of the
Werner Ft. Ticonderoga Marion Georgetown tournament and the Nagumo award
Sumter Anywhere in South (plaque and $10) for the best Japanese
Scenario 2: Saratoga Carolina play of the tournament.
Ferguson New York
Brant Oswego The last scenario, designed to be used For info, mail Glenn Petroski at:
Stark Albany with the 1776 format, that I am familiar
Werner Ft. Ticonderoga with, is an excellent scenario written by Glenn E. L. Petroski
Fred Sassin on the French and Indian 210 W. Hunt
Scenario 3: Greene's Southern Cam. War, entitled Montcalm & Wolfe. It Twin Lakes, WI 53181-9786
Marion Replace Leader A appeared in the General Vol. 20 No. 3. (414) 877-4178
at Georgetown I am enclosing the leader rules for this
scenario, I highly recommend you dig it Pre-registration fee is $20 by 2/15/97;
Scenario 5: Tory and Indian Campaign out and give it a try. It also shows the $25 thereafter. Special tournament rate
Brant Replace Leader B game could be adapted to other early of $49 per night has been arranged at
at Painted Post American wars. I would be very the DAYS INN - Kenosha; (414) 857-
interested if someone tried to create a 2311.
scenario based on the War of 1812.
I think I will probably be attending this
one myself. See you there.
 12 The Boardgamer
In History Of The World
At the start of History Of The World,
each player is dealt a hand of nine
Event cards, one card from each
category. Players may play up to two
cards in each Epoch. Since every cards
helps the player or hurts an opponent,
players strive to get all their cards into
play. Therefore, it’s a waste to be left
with any cards in your hand at the end
of the game.
But, it’s also axiomatic of good play to
make the best use of cards, not just
throw them down willy-nilly. Timing is
important. That’s what this article is
about: timing.
For some cards, timing is obvious.
Black Death, for instance, can only be
played in Epoch VI. It follows, therefore,
that Black Death should by played in
Epoch VI, unless another card-play is
vitally more important.
Other cards can be played in more than
one Epoch, but are still best used at
certain stages of the game. For
instance, “Allies”, which confers two
extra armies to expand into vacant
lands, is a boon to Egypt (Epoch I),
allowing it to dominate both the Middle
East and Africa, but the same card is
useless to Germany (Epoch VII)
because every land Germany can reach
is likely to be occupied. “Allies”,
therefore, is an Early Game card.
“Barbarians”, on the other hand, is of no
use to Egypt because the lands next to
th e Barr en L and s wh enc e th e
barbarians issue are unoccupied or
inaccessible. “Barbarians” is a Middle-
Late Game card.
It’s most important, before players do
anything else at the start of their turn,
that they look at their hand and decide
which “play before turn” card(s) to play.
It’s just good sense to go about the
game in an orderly way. Don’t suffer the
indignity of having your “Hittites” card
nullified because you moved your
armies marker on the VP track or placed
your Shang capital too soon!
Enough preliminaries. Let’s look at the
cards by category:
Volume 2, Issue 1
Event Cards
by Michael Anchors
Dark Green (Flags) Group
Population Explosion, Civil Service,
Allies. Play Early. These cards furnish
the active empire with two extra armies.
Extra armies are more useful to early
empires, because the early empires
have so few armies. This isn’t always
true, of course. Two extra armies/fleets
come in handy for the Dutch (Epoch
VII). But you can’t base a game plan on
getting the Dutch. You should use your
“civics” card the first time you see the
chance to garner three extra VPs. You
might not get another chance and you’re
unlikely to get more than three VPs with
it.
Ship Building. Play during any Epoch.
Most useful for small maritime powers,
such as the Minoans, Netherlands or
Portugal.
Engineering. Play Early to Middle
Epochs. Two free forts for the active
empire. Less useful in the last epoch(s)
since the fortified sites don’t have
enough time to rack up points and
maritime powers can bypass fortified
bottlenecks.
Trade Bonus. Play in Middle Epochs.
In the early game, no one will trade with
you because extra armies benefit you
more than them. Wait until a game
leader is established. Then all the
wanna-be’s will be eager to trade.
Rust Red (Skull) Group
Barbarians. Middle Epochs are usually
the best time to play this card because
the lands around the Barren Lands are
filled with enough choice targets and
smaller empires in the Middle Game
need the assistance.
Black Death. Epoch VI. Use it or lose
it.
Plague, Pestilence and Famine. Play in
any Epoch. Did your opponent garrison
his capital/monument with three armies?
Too bad. You can play one of these
cards to soften up his garrison before
assaulting it directly. Be careful with
“Pestilence”. It affects adjacent lands
around the target — be sure these
areas don’t hold your own armies.
January 1997
Ochre (Wave) Group
Disaster. Play in Middle Epochs. Six of
these cards destroy monuments, cities
and forts in the target land. The seventh
card destroys fleets in one sea. Choose
a target land/sea belonging to the game
leader, with juicy cities/monuments
threatening to survive for several turns
without the intervention o Mother
Nature.
Dark Blue (Bearded Warrior) Group
Leader, Weaponry, Fanaticism. Play in
any Epoch. These are the most
powerful offensive cards in the game.
They should be reserved for the times
when you command a large empire with
good opportunities. Usually, you will
prefer to use this card in a later Epoch
because (1) later empires have a better
chance to score, (2) getting ahead early
can hurt you in the Epoch card draws,
and (3) it is more clear late in the game
which opponent is the most dangerous.
On the other hand, you can’t count on
getting Britain or France, can you? So
should you withhold Darius from the
Persians in hopes of using your leader
card on the Brits? Hmm. I’d say it
depends on your position in the game
and what other cards you hold.
Orange (Clashing Swords) Group
Jihad, Elite Troops. Play in any Epoch.
These attacking cards are not as
powerful as the dark blue group
because they are more easily lost
through defeats. It’s important, when
using them, to fight the easiest battles
first. Save the hard ones for later.
Civil War. Play Middle to Late Epochs.
This card is like the “Revolt” of
“Kingdom” cards — best used for
reestablishing your color in an area of
the board whence you were wiped out.
Another way to use this card is to soften
up an enemy empire for the kill. Civil
wars are good fort-killers, too. Forts are
useless against them.
Jewish Revolt, Crusade. Play in Middle
Epochs. Use these cards like a
Kingdom card to get a toehold in the
Middle East when it will win you points.
Don’t expect your city and fort in
Palestine to last very long.
 The Boardgamer Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997 13

Event Cards In History Of The World (Cont.)

Light Blue (Sword-In-Hand) Group are similar to the corresponding light ANY EPOCH
blue cards, but bolster only a single
Treachery. Play in any Epoch. The empire. Ship Building Plague
atomic bomb. Automatically wins all Pestilence Famine
attacks in one land. The target should, Purple (Castles) Group Leader Weaponry
of course, be a land with lots of points Fanaticism Jihad
and a hefty garrison/fort (or to break Kingdom. Variable play. Play a Elite Troops Treachery
through difficult terrain to lead to future Kingdom card when the indicated Rebellion Surprise Attack
open terrain attacks, such as breaking kingdom is likely to survive several Siegecraft
the Great Wall of China, editor). epochs. Kingdoms are most apropos
when your color has been wiped out of PARTICULAR EPOCHS
Rebellion. Play in any Epoch. Use this an area of the board and the empire you
card to sneak your color into an area of have to play is on the other side of the Minor Empires Black Death
the board where it doesn’t exist. Aim at world. Sub-Saharan Migrants Kingdom
a land with one army and no fort. North American Migrants
Rebellions aren’t very strong. Upper Nile. Epoch II, or Epoch IV
after the Arabs.
Empires Revive, Empires Fortify. Play Southern Iberia. Epoch III after the
Early to Middle Epochs. Provides four Romans.
armies or three forts, in two pre-existing Malay Peninsula. Epoch V after the History Of The World
empires. Good for reinforcing point- Romans. December 4, 1996 171 Active Players
getting positions which promise to last a Highland. Epoch IV. 1. Timothy Johnston 1603 AG-A5
few turns if protected. Gold Coast. Epoch IV, V or VI (the 2. Jim Fardette 1569 AE-A6
sooner, the more points the city 3. Keith Levy 1563 AG-A6
Maroon (Arrow) Group earns). 4. Helen Hsieh 1562 AG-A5
5. Thomas Scarborough 1562 AG-A5
Surprise Attack. Play in any Epoch. North American Migrants. Epoch II or 6. Olin Hentz 1553 AH-B6
Voids the effect of forts and difficult III. 7. Michael Hart 1553 AH-B6
terrain in one land, so this card would be 8. Stefan Krzywicki 1542 AI-B6
best used in attacking a land with a fort Sub-Saharan Migrants. Epoch VI. 9. Josh Johnson 1536 AD-A5
and difficult terrain. Great for Southeast 10. Laura Ehlers 1535 AC-A6
Asia. Light Green (Domed City) Group 11. Gordon Bliss 1535 AC-A6
12. William Edwards 1535 AC-A6
Siegecraft. Play in any Epoch. The Minor Empires. Fixed play. Each minor 13. Ben Goldstein 1535 AC-A5
active empire ignores forts. Good when empire can only be played in its 14. David Metzger 1535 AC-A6
there are a lot of forts to conquer. particular epoch. Don’t forget to play it. 15. Michael Newman 1534 ACA-6
16. George Young 1528 AC-A6
17. Brian Carr 1528 AE-A5
Pirates. Play in Early Epochs. One free Summary
18. Amber Martin 1528 AE-A5
fleet, regardless of navigation. You’re
19. Michael Frey 1528 AE-A6
never going to get more than one VP Here is a summary list of my
20. Gary MacLellan 1528 AE-A6
per turn for this fleet anyway, so play it recommendations: 21. Edward Wrobel 1528 AE-A5
at the first chance in a sea where the 22. Matthew Romaniecki 1528 AE-A5
fleet is likely to survive. Shang pirates EARLY CARDS (Epochs I and II) 23. Cliff Ackman 1528 AE-A6
in the Sea of Japan or Lower Indus 24. Andrew Kutzy 1528 AE-A5
pirates in the Bay of Bengal are the best Population Explosion Allies 25. James Allaire 1528 AE-A6
examples. Civil Service Pirates 26. Ivan Lawson 1528 AE-A6
Empire(s) Revive Engineering 27. Eric Hessen 1528 AE-A5
Naval Supremacy. Play in Late Epochs. Empire(s) Fortify 28. Keith Altizer 1528 AE-A6
This card is most useful to the maritime 29. Lillian Burke 1528 AE-A5
powers appearing in Epochs VI and VII. MIDDLE CARDS (Epochs III, IV and V) 30. Eric Redstone 1527 AE-A6
Players might be tempted to use the 31. Christina Hancock 1527 AE-A6
card with Mediterranean empires such Trade Bonus Barbarians 32. Jared Scarborough 1522 AG-B6
as the Greeks, Romans and Byzantines, Disaster Jewish Revolt 33. Chris Sasso 1522 AG-B6
but those empires would be better Crusade Kingdom 34. Michael Ehlers 1522 AG-A6
served by the dark blue cards, “Elite Empire(s) Revive Engineering 35. Kevin LeRow 1522 AG-B6
Troops” or “Jihad” since these cards Empire(s) Fortify Civil War 36. Paul McCarthy 1522 AG-A6
have effect on land and sea. Playing 37. William Navolis 1521 AG-B6
“Naval Supremacy” and a land card is LATE CARDS (Epochs VI and VII) 38. Richard Trockel 1521 AG-B6
39. Jeffrey Miller 1521 AC-B6
overkill.
40. Lauren Hickok 1514 AH-B6
Naval Supremacy
41. Dennis Disney 1514 AH-B6
Empire Revives, Empire Fortifies. Play Civil War 42. Kathy Stroh 1509 AI-B6
in Early to Middle Epochs. These cards 43. James Yerkey 1500 AC-A6
 14 The Boardgamer Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997
Advanced Squad Leader 2-Player Game
AREA Victory Claim Chit AREA Victory Claim Chit
_________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________
(winner’s name) (winner’s name)

_________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________
(player number) (player number)

_____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________
(signature) (signature)
HAS DEFEATED HAS DEFEATED

_________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________
(defeated player’s name) (defeated player’s name)

_________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________
(player number) (player number)

_____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________
(signature) (signature)

in a rated live pbm game of Advanced Squad Leader: in a rated live pbm game of:

_____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________
(Scenario Name and/or Number) (Name of Game)

_____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________
(Side of Winner) (Game Company Published By)

_____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________
(Date) (Date)

_____________________________________________________________________
(Play Balance Used - If Any) Return this chit to: 1st Subsequent
Glenn Petroski game vs. this opponent
Return to: Russ Gifford 1st Subsequent
6829 23rd Avenue
320 E. 27th Street game vs. this opponent
Kenosha, WI 53143-1233
South Sioux, NE 68776

Multi-Player Game AREA Victory Claim Chit

______________________________________ ______________________________________ ______________________________________
(Name of Winner #1) (Name of Defeated Player #1) (Name of Defeated Player #4)

______________________________________ ______________________________________ ______________________________________

(Player Number) (Player Number) (Player Number)

______________________________________ ______________________________________ ______________________________________

(Signature) (Signature) (Signature)

______________________________________ ______________________________________ ______________________________________

(Name of Winner #2) (Name of Defeated Player #2) (Name of Defeated Player #5)

______________________________________ ______________________________________ ______________________________________

(Player Number) (Player Number) (Player Number)

______________________________________ ______________________________________ ______________________________________

(Signature) (Signature) (Signature)

in a rated live pbm game of:

______________________________________ ____________________________________
(Name of Defeated Player #3) (Name of Defeated Player #6)
______________________________________
(Name of Game)
______________________________________ ____________________________________
(Player Number) (Player Number)
______________________________________
(Game Company Published By)
______________________________________ ____________________________________
(Signature) (Signature)
______________________________________
(Date)
Return this chit to:
If more than 2 winners or 6 defeated Glenn Petroski
players, continue listing on another chit 6829 23rd Avenue Check here if continued
and mark box in lower right corner. Kenosha, WI 53143-1233 on another chit.
 The Boardgamer
Four Days of Fun, Competition and Fatigue
Travelling to my second Avaloncon, I
arrived at the Marriot on Wednesday
evening for my first tournament, a new
game called Air Baron. It is not quite
like Rail Baron, more an economic
game with a touch of History Of The
World. Like a majority of the players, I
had not played this game before. The
game is simple, quick and fun. I did not
advance to the next round as I did not
grasp the fare war concept quickly
enough. With plenty of time left, I
grabbed some food and wandered over
to Open Gaming.
Thursday morning was busy as the
convention officially got started. I was a little more critical than I
played in my favorite wargame, Russian
Front. Due to a couple of no or late
shows, the tournament did not meet the
minimum eight entrants requirement.
That means it will become a demo next
year. I hate to see any great game, let
alone Russian Front, languish and fade
away slowly this way. I know there is a
whole bunch of people out there playing
eastern front games. If you like
strategic level games, this is a great
game. Especially to the people who
play The Russian Campaign, Russian
Front has a very innovative design,
employing more fluid action, pleasing
graphics, and very dynamic combat
interactions. I’ve played quite a few
eastern front games, none of which
approaches the elegance and ease of
play of this game. After being
introduced to this game, I literally
stopped playing other eastern front
games. I urge all you Russian Front
players out there as well as any eastern
front gamer to compete in this
tournament next year.
I was able to advance to the final round
along with Marty Roecker. Talk about a
real fan and historian of WWII Eastern
Front, Marty has researched, revised
and expanded the rules and scope of
the Russian Front game system. It has
taken him years of work, and with at
least five or six copies of the game itself,
he has expanded the mapboard and
created many realistic combat units, like
the Italian Alpini Corps and the Soviet
mechanized armies, that actually fought
in that ferocious campaign. I felt
ashamed in that I only own my original
worn out copy of Russian Front while
Volume 2, Issue 1
Avaloncon 1996
by James Pei
learning that many other veteran players
owned several copies of the game.
Anyway, Marty bid 21 objectives for the
Axis in the four-turn final while I bid 22.
My attacks in Army Group North and
Center were successful in turning his
flanks and cutting a large number of
Soviet units out of supply. However,
Army Group South bogged down south
of the Pripet Marshes. I did not want to
repeat the mistake of Marty’s previous
opponent when he inadvertently over
extended his panzers blitzing near Kiev
and then watched them surrender due
to out of supply status. The situation
anticipated since Odessa probably
would not fall by turn 4. That means I
needed to take either Vitebsk in the
central sector or Novgorod near
Leningrad to meet my 22 objective
points. I decided to strike north for
Novgorod since it is easier to occupy
and it puts pressure on the Soviet units
in the Leningrad area. Besides, the
central front sector was swarming with
lines of determined Red Army soldiers.
My decision proved very wise as Marty
shifted his Leningrad defense away from
the Finns to protect against the now
menacing German panzers. In his
haste, he left fortress Leningrad
unguarded. I was able to blast my way
through the Baltic coast corridor, and
using a reserve Finnish unit, occupied
Leningrad. With the loss of Leningrad
and the Baltic fleet, plus the 4 objective
points, Marty conceded.
Previously, with mutual agreement,
Marty and I postponed of Russian Front
final until Friday to allow me to play in
History Of The World with Bidding on
Thursday night. The tournament format
is based on the concept described in the
GENERAL, Volume 29, #1. This year, it
was at tournament status after debuting
last year as a demo. My bidding in the
preliminary round was fairly low, picking
up empires at a bargain. I was able to
steadily accumulate more and more
points. However, by a combination of
my not paying attention and his lying low
throughout the game, Robert Kircher
sneaked his way through to win over me
by one point. I was surprised and
dismayed by my lack of diligence. But
the GM, Joe Lux, consoled me that I
had a good chance of getting into the
January 1997 15
final on Sunday morning since some
finalists don’t show up due to winning a
spot on other finals. With my high
score, I would be the first alternate.
Sure enough, I was informed by Joe a
day later that I was in.
Fast forwarding to Sunday morning saw
six finalists competing in the first HWB
championship. Player black, Bruce
Bernard, jumped out to a big lead with
65 points due to snowballing the
Romans with the Guptas early in the
fourth epoch. The next highest was only
36 points. I was dead last going into the
fourth epoch and only managed to pull
in 30 points. Seeing that my situation
was almost hopeless, I bid high for the
Mongols for one last hurrah. Along with
the crusade card and getting the Ming
Dynasty in the sixth epoch, I was able to
catapult into first place with my blue
presence in almost every area. Of
course, everybody else sacking the
Roman player’s pieces helped a lot.
With only a few points separating the
front runners and the championship up
for grabs, everyone was bidding rather
low to pick up empires at a bargain. I
was surprised to get Britain for only 28
points. Naturally, my blue monuments
and pieces were the target of many
reprisals and attacks. But with a
powerful legion of 20 armies, I had no
trouble holding onto my lead and the
championship. Special mention should
be awarded to player red, Robert
Kircher, who again managed to squeeze
through to a second place tie with player
black. By virtue of getting 37 net points
for the Netherlands, Robert won the tie-
breaker. This was amazing considering
that Robert did not get any great empire.
His only strong empire was the
Byzantines! What a good player!
My personal thanks to one of the HWB
players, John Weber, who offered to
give me a ride to the airport after
learning that I would miss my return
flight to Austin for the second year in a
row. Since we did not finish the final
until 3:30 pm in the afternoon, we barely
had enough time to get to the airport.
By weaving through traffic (while
observing the speed limit), John
managed to drop me off at BWI five
minutes from takeoff. I raced to the
departure gate, hopping onto the plane
 16 The Boardgamer
Avaloncon 1996 (Cont.)
just before the flight attendant closed
the door. What a way to end a fun and
wonderful week, sweating to the end.
To wrap up, I played in another Air
Baron heat and two other tournaments,
Acquire and Hannibal. One thing I like
about tournaments with multiple heats is
the flexible time schedule. I entered in
yet another round of Air Baron on Friday
afternoon when my schedule was open.
But luck was not with me that time as
my LAX hub did not make me money
until too late. Afterwards, I wanted to
enter in the Titan tournament. But
running low on fuel and ammo (tired and
hungry), I decided to withdraw from the
battlefield to my room where I took a
nap. Later, I replenished my stomach
by enjoying the excellent buffet at the
hotel restaurant.
I have always enjoyed Acquire since it
contains no dice. However, being a
Saturday morning game did not help my
cause as I was not yet fully awake. My
brain was still in a semi-conscious state.
I just could not keep track of how many
shares of which hotel a player had.
Needlessly to say, I lost in all three
rounds of the tournament.
By Saturday afternoon, I was combat
ready for Hannibal: Rome vs. Carthage.
This is a great game, even better than
We The People. You can tell just by
strolling through the Open Gaming Area
how popular this new game is as many
people were playing Hannibal. Since I
had a little more experience than my
opponents who were just learning the
game, I was able to advance quickly to
the third round. While waiting for my
next opponent, I had the chance to chat
with the designer who told me that he is
working on another new game,
Alexander The Great. Wow, can’t wait
for that one!
Anyway, I lost in the third round, only by
one province. At one point, my
opponent offered to resign. I convinced
him to continue since anything can
happen in a four turn format. Something
did happen and I was dismayed that I
wound up losing. I cursed and
screamed (on the inside, of course). On
the outside, I congratulated my
opponent and graciously shook his hand
(maybe squeezing a touch hard). Even
though I was now very fatigued, my
adrenaline was still pumping. So I went
over to play in Open Gaming. War is
hell!
Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997
This had been another outstanding jackpot in infusing an esprit de corps to
convention. The second time around all the wargamers and leisure gamers
was even more enjoyable. I saw many with this wonderful annual convention.
familiar faces and got to know new Something the gaming hobby needs
ones. Like many players, I was mentally badly, a sense a belonging and
and physically fatigued. But it was the leadership. Keep up the good work. I
kind of fatigue that leaves a good feeling do hope next year’s Con will be even of
inside you. Don Greenwood and the longer duration.
Avalon Hill staff have definitely hit the
Pay Increase For Authors!
Starting with Volume 2 in 1997 (this issue), pay for authors will be doubled to
one free issue of the BOARDGAMER for each half page the article occupies.
In addition, those who have built up a number of issues can instead cash
them in at the rate of $3.00 each.
The BOARDGAMER is always in need of authors to pen quality articles.
Although there are no set restrictions as far as article content, the
BOARDGAMER will always concentrate on the play of Avalon Hill/Victory
Games board, sports and card games. Thus strategy articles, series replays
and variants for these games are always good material for submission.
Game reviews of some of the older titles which may not be quite as familiar
to some of the newer members of the hobby as they are to the old grognards
would also be welcome material. History articles, game reviews, game
previews and articles dealing with games from other companies will be
considered on a case by case basis.
Articles submitted will not be printed with any significant changes without first
receiving the approval of the original author. It is requested that articles
submitted to the BOARDGAMER not also be submitted elsewhere without
first informing the BOARDGAMER.
BOARDGAMER Back Issues
Yes, we’ve finally been around long enough to have back issues for sale. Each
back issue is available at a cost of $3.50 apiece. Some back issues will also be
available from me at Avaloncon (if you can find me). If ordering in quantities
greater than one, the extra issues are $3.00 each.
Preview Issue - Circus Maximus (V), Candidate (S), War At Sea (R, S), 1830 (V),
Up Front (R), AREA News & Ratings (N)
Volume 1, Issue 1 - Avaloncon 1995 (N), Assassin (S), Panzer Leader (Sc),
AREA News & Ratings (N)
Volume 1, Issue 2 - Avaloncon 1995 (N), History Of The World (SR),
Panzerblitz/Leader (Sc, V), 1776 (Sc), AREA News & Ratings (N)
Volume 1, Issue 3 - Battle Of The Bulge ‘91 (S), Auction (S), War At Sea (S),
Victory In The Pacific (N), Machiavelli (S), Starship Troopers (N),
Fortress Europa (SR), AREA News & Ratings (N)
Volume 1, Issue 4 - Fortress Europa (SR), PBEM (N), Panzerblitz (N),
Attack Sub (S), Avaloncon 1996 (R & N), AREA News & Ratings (N)
Key: (H) = History; (N) = Narrative; (R) = Rules Clarifications; (S) = Strategy; (Sc) = Scenario;
(SR) = Series Replay; (V) = Variant
 The Boardgamer Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997 17

The write-ups from many Avaloncon
tournaments appeared in the last issue
of the BOARDGAMER. Following is the
write-ups from two more. Hopefully,
more details about other events will
follow in an upcoming issue of the
GENERAL.
BATTLE OF THE BULGE ‘91
(GM - Kevin McCarthy)
This year’s tournament resulted in a
three to one majority in American
victories. The automatic victory
condition for the German capture of
Liege was eliminated and is now part of
the normal victory conditions.
As in most Bulge games, the German
situation usually deteriorates after the
December 17th turn. The German’s
must make great strides on the opening
moves if they hope to attain victory.
Bulge ‘91 is an interesting mixture on
non-locking ZOC’s, weather and air
power variables. Neither side can be
totally secure from devastating isolation
moves.
This year’s field contained three
returning champions with four plaques
among them. The first round saw the
o n l y G erm a n vi c to ri es i n t h e
tournament. The surprise of the
tournament occurred when John
Metzger defeated one former champion
and played a very close game against
another.
Late Returns
From Avaloncon 1996
by Avaloncon GM’s
BREAKOUT: NORMANDY
(GM - Ron Fedin)
Breakout Normandy (BKN) started out
the weekend with a “Mulligan” round on
Wednesday night. Players could take or
leave their Wednesday night results, in
place of the regular first round, which
was scheduled for Friday. Mulligan
round losers could drop their loss status
and start fresh on Round 1 on Friday
morning. Mulligan round winners could
sleep in on Friday and would not report
for regular BKN tournament play until the
start of Round 2 on Friday afternoon.
Thirty four people played in the BKN
Mulligan round, some experimenting
with tactics, knowing that a loss could be
discarded. Players seemed to
appreciate this chance to warm up for
the regular BKN tournament.
Friday, the regular BKN play began. 54
players took part in the BKN tournament,
an increase of six players over last
year’s Avaloncon BKN tournament. New
this year was the use of the bid (to play
the Allies) as the points to be awarded
for a victory, by either the Allies or the
Axis. This system provided a convenient
tiebreak for people with the same won/
loss record, a problem for any 2-player
tournament with 54 players and only 6
rounds of play.
Axis play dominated with 47 wins versus
the 33 wins for the Allies. Since the
bidding for the Allies was an auction bid
two assistants was that the entire BKN
field appeared to be much stronger than
in previous years (especially Mike
Welker). Rounding out the BKN prize
winners were Jim Doughan, third;
Murray Cowles, fourth; Matt Fagan, fifth;
Ron Fedin, sixth; Don Greenwood,
seventh; and Alan Bard, eighth.
Several special items to note. Jim
Doughan donated a chess clock to each
the first and second place BKN and
Turning Point: Stalingrad finishers, as
appreciation for having these events run
at Avaloncon. Thanks Jim! Special
note also to Bruno Sinigaglio who
entered the BKN tournament with very
limited knowledge of the rules with the
intent to learn more about the game.
His first opponent, Keith McFarland,
patiently continued to explain situations
to Bruno throughout the game, rather
t h a n t a k i n g a dv a n t a g e o f hi s
inexperience, and ultimately ended up in
a sure-lose position as the Allies. Bruno
graciously evacuated Caen, allowing
Keith to obtain a win, in respect for the
time and effort provided to teach Bruno
the rules and tactics of BKN. Don
Greenwood also put in a strong bid
again this year to earn that coveted
championship plaque from one of the
area-movement games, which has
eluded him since the first Avaloncon.
Only the ultimate champion ruined his
tournament win record.

The final was between Jack Morrell (the

reigning champion) as the Americans
and Kevin McCarthy as the Germans.
A good German opening was stymied
when the skies cleared and eight
American air appeared on turn two.
Jack’s skillful placement and delaying
tactics slowed the Germans on turn
three. On December 19th the Germans
managed to isolate the southern portion
of the American line. Then on the 20th,
the skies cleared for the remainder of
the game. Air drops and sound
American strategy sealed the fate of the
Germans during the last two turns.
With this victory, Jack became the first
back to back champion in Bulge ‘91.
at the start of each game, the
dominance of Axis wins seems to infer Classified Ads
that people tended to overestimate the
This service will be available free of
ease of the Allies action or players got
charge to all of the BOARDGAMER’s
carried away with the auction bidding
subscribers. The BOARDGAMER
process. Maybe it was playing the six
assumes no responsibility for the
five-hour rounds in less than two full
business practices of those advertising
days!
here.
The BKN tournament was won by
Please keep all ads down to a
newcomer Hank Burkhalter, his first
maximum of 50 words apiece. Also
Aval onc on. Hi s 1 99 6 BKN
keep in mind that the BOARDGAMER
championship was deservedly earned
goes to the printer several weeks
with wins over the 1994 BKN champion,
before it is mailed, therefore if you wish
Don Greenwood and four other worthy
your ad to appear in the April issue, it
opponents. Second place was taken by
better arrive at the BOARDGAMER by
Bryan Eshleman who, along with Hank
late February at the latest.
Burkhalter, entered the final game
undefeated. Both vowed to come back There were no ads received this issue.
next year to try again! The overall This feature will continue only if interest
comment from the GameMaster and his is sustained.
 18 The Boardgamer
Circus Maximus
Strategy Tips For Tournament Play
When I started gaming in 1980, my first
games were, in order: Battle of the
Bulge ‘65, Third Reich, Panzer Leader,
Fortress Europa, Tobruk and Arab-
Israeli Wars. All two-player games,
which was good because I only knew
two other guys willing to play these
games. Then someone else in town
purchased Circus Maximus. We were
able to get a group of six together, and
for about two months we played a lot of
Circus Maximus. Then the group split
up and I haven’t been able to play multi-
player games at home since.
So, when I went to my first Origins in
1983, I went to play Third Reich and the
other “serious” two player games. I was
unprepared for how serious they were
(and how poor my strategies were). I
was having very little fun until I got to
the Circus Maximus tournament being
run by Bruno Sinigaglio. If anyone
remembers this Origins in Detroit, all the
tournaments were held in one huge
room, and the Circus Maximus
tournament drew a lot of attention due to
all the yelling, screaming and shouts of
“Alpo!” every time a horse was
damaged. I came back for multiple
heats, and soon Bruno was showing me
some of the finer points of the game
(usually while he was defeating some
poor foe at Afrika Korps at a nearby
table). Eventually, I made it into the
final, a monstrosity with somewhere
between 18 and 22 chariots (I can’t
remember exactly), all of whom were
required to have heavy chariots, which
was four laps long instead of the usual
three. About six hours later I was
poised to win the tournament when
Jimmy Page came along side me thanks
to a good strain whip, launched a
successful attack and killed one of my
three remaining horses. I later
calculated that the odds of that attack
keeping me from winning the race was
only 11%.
This experience hooked me on Circus
Maximus tournaments, and I have been
in the Origins, Atlanticon or Avaloncon
tournaments every year since. Although
I have only managed to win one
tournament, I have been able to win a
number of heats and finish high in many
finals. From these experiences and
from playing with and talking to players
who seem to consistently finish near the
Volume 2, Issue 1
by Bruce Monnin
top, I have come up with a few tips on
how to play well with various types of
chariots.
Heavy Chariots
Heavy chariots are the best chariots to
take just to have fun. The heavy
chariots get to do most of the attacking
and get to instill the most fear. All fun
stuff!
When deciding whether to take a heavy
chariot, pay attention to the other
players. For a heavy to win a race, the
field needs to be at least 1/3 and
preferable half full of heavy chariots. A
lone heavy chariot will have lots of
targets for 2-3 turns, then the survivors
will zip on past, not to see him again
until they lap him. If you notice some
people who usually take heavy chariots,
or hear lots of talk of dead horses and
flipped chariots, then it might be safe to
take a heavy.
When selecting a heavy chariot, the
next decision is where should your other
two preparation points go.
Endurance may not be necessary. You
will seldom, if ever, be attacked, so
endurance is not necessary for braking.
Heavy chariots will also be going slower,
so they can run through the more inner
lanes on the turns and will only need
voluntary straining on the straightaways.
Therefore, one point at most should be
used for endurance, and you can
usually get away with no preparation
points.
At least one point should be used for
driver modifier, or else your opponents
may succeed in evading your every
attack. Two points are ideal, but then
you will have a very slow chariot.
Team speed is where the real decision
comes in. A preparation point here
raises your speed by 2-3 movement
points (MP) each turn, while a driver
modifier prep point will raise your speed
by 1, help you strain in corners and help
you succeed in attacking others. The
tradeoff is that increased team speed
will help you keep up with the leaders to
attack them more often, while the driver
modifier will help the attacks go through,
if you can just keep up.
January 1997
Circus Maximus races generally break
down into two distinct groups, the light,
fast chariots and the slow, heavy
chariots. The heavy chariots need to
damage the fast chariots early before
they can pull away. The races then
generally evolve such that some fast
chariots sneak away, and some heavy
chariots slow down to kill them on the
next time around the track. Therefore,
as a heavy chariot, it is a good idea to
make certain you are at the front of the
other heavy chariots. Let the other
heavy chariots do the attacking early,
while you go ahead as fast as you can.
Eventually, you can talk the other heavy
chariots who are behind you into
slowing down to set up the gauntlet line
while you keep chasing to make sure
the leaders don’t try to slow down while
working their way through the gauntlet.
With any luck, the leading light chariots
will be killed on the last straightaway
where there is no room left for the other
heavy chariots to stop you from winning
the race.
Light Chariots
Light chariots require a different type of
driver than the heavy chariots. The
driver of a light chariot has to be able to
accept the fact that everyone is going to
be out to get him without developing a
persecution complex. The game is kind
of like a fox hunt. It looks like it is a lot
more fun to be the hounds, but it is more
challenging to be the fox (and you’re
more likely to end up dead).
It is best to be a light chariot when the
race is full of other light or normal
chariots. If you are the only light in a
field of heavy chariots, you are going to
need incredible luck to survive. So, if
you look around the board and see a
bunch of fellow gamers who look to be
the violent and vengeful types, a light
chariot may not be the best choice.
After deciding to go with the light
chariot, the next decision is where to
allocate your four unused preparation
points.
Endurance is much more of a necessity
with a light chariot. You will probably
burn a lot of endurance braking from
attacks, a little more straining in the
corners and as much as possible using
 The Boardgamer
Circus Maximus (Cont.)
voluntary straining to distance yourself
from the killers in the pack. At least one
preparation point is needed here. Two
would be nice, but there are more
glaring needs elsewhere.
Driver modifier is crucial with this type of
chariot. A light chariot will be the target
of many attacks, so a good driver
modifier is needed to try and avoid
them. A light chariot will probably also
need to take a few chances on the
turns. Finally, a light chariot is wasting
his time making ram attacks on another
chariot or horses. Instead, when being
hounded by a heavy chariot, a lash
attack result of an ‘M’ (movement loss)
or ‘W’ (wound with a movement loss)
can slow him down enough to make a
getaway. A good driver modifier is
needed to get on the positive Lash
Factor side of the Lash Attack Table, as
this increases the chances of a positive
result and reduces the chances of the
dreaded ‘G’ result (whip grabbed). Due
to the possibility of losing the whip, the
lash attacks are better left until the first
lap is complete, when you’ve already
used much of your endurance and there
are not so many pursuers on your tail.
At least one preparation point must go
to the driver modifier, two is even better.
Speed is an interesting decision that
many novices miss. If you’re going to
have a light chariot, you better have all
the speed you can get, right? So, many
automatically put down 2 preparation
points for speed and then sacrifice
endurance or their driver modifier. This
is not necessarily the best choice.
If you use 2 preparation points for
speed, then you either have a driver
modifier of only 1 or very little
endurance. Your only strategy will be to
run as fast as you can and hope you
don’t suffer any damaging attacks.
Everyone else in the race knows this
too, and you will be an early target. This
setup gives you the best chance to run
away with a race, especially in a group
of players who are more interested in
attacking anyone for the fun of it than in
working together to catch the early
leaders. This setup also gives you the
best chance to be knocked out of the
race early so that you can move on to
another tournament.
Another alternative is to use just 1
preparation point for team speed and
use two for driver modifier. You will not
Volume 2, Issue 1
be the fastest chariot on the track, but
as such you may not be the main target,
either. With this chariot, you should stay
as far away from the obvious leader as
possible, i.e. if the leader(s) takes the
corner in an outside lane, try to work
your way through the inner lanes.
Hopefully, the heavy pursuing chariots
will be concentrating on the leader,
allowing you to stay near the front
without using too much endurance or
suffering too much damage. If the
heavy chariots fail to eliminate or
sufficiently damage the leaders, you will
eventually have to goes after them
yourself with lash attacks to hopefully
slow them back down within reach of the
pursuing pack.
Remember, when you choose a light
chariot you have committed to racing,
not combat. Limit your attacks to an
occasional driver lash attack against
chariots which can be swerved into the
wall, lash attacks against horses of
chariots preparing to enter a corner, or a
driver lash attack against a heavy
chariot which has been hounding you in
an attempt to slow him down enough to
get away. However, be selective in your
lash attacks until you have used a good
portion of your endurance.
Normal Chariots
Although not technically a part of either
of the two previously mentioned groups,
normal chariots are flexible enough to
be a lesser version of either group. As
such, normal chariots manage to win a
surprising number of races.
The most popular normal chariot is the
“horse with no name” combination of
one preparation point in every category.
This is also a frequent winner. It allows
you the flexibility to run any kind of race.
The main disadvantage is that instead of
allowing you to dictate the type of race
you will run, it forces you to react to the
type of race others are running.
For those wishing to be able to run with
the light chariots, an alternative is to
take the preparation point away from
team endurance and add it to team
speed. With this setup you will need to
carefully hoard your endurance to avoid
running out before the end of the race.
If there are many light chariots in the
race, then a normal needs to make an
immediate alliance with the heavy
January 1997 19
chariots. If the heavy chariots are still in
range of the lights, then a normal may
attack the light chariots. Although any
damage caused will not cripple a light
chariot, 2 or 3 such attacks may. Due to
their minimal expected damage, attacks
on horse teams are not worth the
movement point they cost, especially
early in the race.
A better attack choice, especially if the
heavy chariots are starting to fall behind,
is the lash attack. An ‘M’ or ‘W’ result
will slow up the defender, allowing the
heavy’s to catch up. If nearing a corner,
an ‘S’ (sideslip) result can ruin the
defender’s plan for taking a particular
lane through that corner.
If there are many heavy chariots in the
race, it is best for a normal chariot to
keep a low profile. In other words,
perform no attacks, try to stay clear of
the leaders and do not use voluntary
straining if it may put you into the lead.
The plan is to be clear of some of the
heavy chariots before they decide that
you are a prime target.
General Tips
Straightaways are 34 spaces long.
Always keep this in mind when plotting
out your next move or two. This means
if you have a current team speed of 17
or 18, you can cruise around the track in
the inner lane spending two turns on the
straight and one in the corner. This will
allow you to keep up with most anyone
without using any endurance. If you are
just barely through a corner, knowing
this also makes it easier to count out
how many spaces you are from the next
corner by subtracting how far you have
cleared the last corner from 34.
If near but not in the lead and a heavy
chariot is just a little too far off the pace
to catch the leader, ask him if you may
whip his horses. This has two effects:
(1) the heavy may be able to catch and
attack the leader, and (2) you may have
just made an alliance which will make it
less likely you will be attacked in the
near future.
If you lose your whip, there are still
many ways to utilize your endurance:
1) Convince others to whip your
horses.
2) Take corners faster than the safe
corner speed.
 20 The Boardgamer
Circus Maximus (Cont.)
3) Brake off written speed so that
you can box in a leader and
force his to wast e hi s
endurance.
When aiming to park in front of an inner
corner lane, know exactly how many
movement points it will take to get there
and write down a few extra for your turn
speed. This will allow you to brake from
any attacks before you move or allow
you to weave in and out of traffic to get
to your desired spot. If you still have
extra movement points when your turn
arrives, use them by launching attacks
(preferably against horses, as there are
no possible repercussions of such
attacks) or by weaving out a lane and
back in. Each time you move out a lane
and back in it costs one MP more than if
you had moved in a straight line.
The inner most corner lane has a safe
corner speed of 8, which makes it the
only lane which can be safely navigated
in one turn without corner straining.
However, whenever other chariots are in
the vicinity, it is wise to plot a speed of 9
or 10. The extra movement will allow
you to get through the turn even if you
were attacked and were forced to brake.
It also allows you to clear the end of the
corner by an extra space, thus giving
you the option to brake from an attack
without backing into the corner.
On a related topic, if you take the inner
most lane through a corner, move out
one lane with your last movement point
as you leave the turn. This prevents an
opponent from trying to swerve you into
the wall with a lash attack, and also
allows you to evade an attack instead of
having to brake and back up into the
corner.
When another chariot is parked in from
of an inner corner lane and has not yet
moved this turn, launch a lash attack on
his horses (especially if they are low on
endurance). Such an attack can have
numerous positive results:
- The defender loses an amount of
endurance equal to the additional
movement factors gained.
- The defender may lose additional
endurance for going faster than the
maximum safe corner speed.
Volume 2, Issue 1
- The defender may suffer adverse
effects on the corner strain chart.
Sideslip results may keep him from
clearing the corner in one turn. Horse
damage and flip results are obviously
also good. But the result you are
realistically looking for is the dreaded
‘Jostled’ result. This results in the
defender losing 3 off of his current driver
modifier (and thus also off his maximum
turn speed). The resulting negative
driver modifier prevents the defender
from voluntary or corner straining, as
well as making him easier to attack.
The effects of the jostle also linger to a
lesser extent for the next two turns.
- The defender may choose to take a
lane farther to the outside. While this
will reduce or eliminate the endurance
loss and corner strain risk, it will slow
down the defender.
If the other chariot has plenty of
endurance, consider a lash attack
against the driver. Either a wound,
movement loss, or brake result could
slow the driver sufficiently so that he can
not clear the corner in one turn. A
sideslip result on an attack from the
outside can force the chariot into a
corner lane farther to the inside than he
would have preferred. The drawback to
this attack is the possibility of the whip
grabbed result.
Notice in the rules that to win the race,
you do not have to being driving your
chariot. You can win the race by being
drug across the finish line by a barely
alive driver. Most dragged drivers have
a decent chance of surviving the race to
the finish line if their chariots flip in the
final turn and all four horses are still
alive. So, if your are a few places back
from the lead going into the final turn
and do not feel you have a realistic
chance of winning, Take the far inside
corner lane at the maximum speed you
can go. Odds are that your chariot will
flip in the corner, but you may gain
enough position by taking the inner lane
that you will contend for the victory
unless someone makes the effort to run
over your dragged driver. Besides,
there is the off chance that you will roll
low and suffer only minor horse damage
or a sideslip, in which case you will have
made a significant gain on the leaders (if
you have not passed them).
January 1997
Above all else, remember that this game
a first and foremost a race. Every time
you stop to attack someone, you are
using a movement factor which could be
used to move you one step closer to the
finish line. Therefore, you must make
sure that your attacks are valuable
enough to be worth the cost. Try to
avoid attacks against opponents with a
higher driver modifier than you, as the
defender is likely to evade such attacks.
Even if you are a heavy chariot, do not
try to take out all of your opponents at
once. Make selective attacks against
those chariots most likely to break away,
and depend on the other players to help
out.
Tournament Tips
One thing to note about tournament
play. There will be players whose only
goal is to take a heavy chariot and have
fun attacking others. Such players are
rarely a threat to win the race. Do not
attack such players, and try to get on
their good side. Such players are
valuable allies, since they are unlikely to
challenge you for the overall win. They
are also likely to mess up everyone's
plans by ignoring a leader if they can’t
get that far and instead attack the
chariots which can reach the leader.
Plan on this eventuality and concentrate
your attacks on the leader, ignore those
who are slightly behind and try to put as
much distance between yourself and
these fun-loving wreckers of havoc on
the track.
If you play in many tournaments, you
will notice that Circus Maximus draws a
number of entrants who are only mildly
familiar with the game. These players
are also unlikely to challenge for the
win. Do not waste movement points
attacking these players early in the race.
Instead, concentrate your race decisions
on the actions of the more experienced
players. If you find yourself in a close
race late in the game against one of
these inexperienced opponents, you can
usually outmaneuver them to seize the
victory, while this will not be the case
with the more experienced players.
Circus Maximus is still a game where an
odd die roll can suddenly result in your
chariot being flipped and your driver
being drug along behind your horse
team. Using good, sound strategy can
help decrease the chances of this
happening, but never eliminate it.
 The Boardgamer
Sweeping The Sweeps
Strategy In The Ratings War Phase of TV Wars
If TV Wars is a war, then the “Ratings
Wars” within the game are the decisive
battles of the war. They represent the
quarterly Nielsen poll of viewers. At
each quarterly sweep, in each time slot,
the program with the lowest rating is
canceled, i.e. ousted from the game.
Since each player’s prime asset is his
roster of programs, it is essential to
avoid the loss of programs. If
wargamers think of programs as their
precious supply of panzer divisions or
aircraft carriers, the whole situation
becomes more familiar.
The game rules have an unusually good
Players notes section, outlining many
important features of strategy, but
advice on program scheduling is
conspicuously absent. Too bad,
because choosing which programs to
play in which time slots is the most
important decision of the game.
Programs come in four time lengths:
30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes; and four
types: Action, Drama, Sitcoms and
Other. Each player starts with 10 hours
of programming and garners more
during the course of the game, in
Tel evisi on Pro ducti on Com pan y
auctions, the “Steal a Program” space
and other means. The rate of
acquisition of programs usually does not
keep pace with the rate of loss, since, in
each sweep, one program gets knocked
out in each of the six time slots, the only
exceptions being the rare case of an
unopposed program or use of the
Preemption tile. If attrition is equal,
each player in a four player game can
expect to lose 1.5 programs per sweep.
Ratings Wars occur, on average, every
6.5 player turns. Hence, to keep even,
each player should plan on acquiring
one new program every turn, a goal
which can seldom be achieved.
Bankruptcies are common in a
(viciously) well-player game.
Each program has a Ratings Point value
which ranges from 10 to 90 for regular
shows and 100 for Academy Award
movies. Specials range from 20 to 120
depending on the roll of two dice. This
value is determined during each sweep,
after the show is placed in the schedule.
Volume 2, Issue 1
by Michael Anchors
If the game ends due to exhaustion of
the Critic’s Choice/Viewer’s Views
st acks, pl ayer s conver t t hei r
programming to cash and add their
actual cash to determine their new worth
winner. Programs are converted at a
rate of $500 per 30 minutes per 10
ratings points. Hence, “Wagon Strain”,
90 minutes long and 40 rating points is
worth 3 x 4 x $500 = $6000. Values
range from $500 (“The Fraidy Bunch”,
“Mrs. Ed”, etc.) to $24,000 (any 120
minute Special for which a ‘12’ is rolled).
Programs earn cash during the game
whenever players land on the Sponsor
s p a c e, $ 5 0 0 p er h a lf - h o u r o f
programming, and, in this case, point
value is irrelevant.
The first principle of programming
strategy is so obvious it shouldn’t need
to be mentioned. Yet it is amazing how
many players ignore it. Take account of
which programs (and Stars) your
opponents have! Until they are placed
on the schedule during a Ratings War,
their programs remain face down and all
you may know about them is their length
and type. But once those programs
have been exposed during a sweep,
there is no excuse for forgetting them.
Would you risk your 80 pt. Other,
knowing that one opponent has a 90 pt.
Action? Would you put up a 60 minute
Drama for bidding when you have seen
that all the high-rated Drama shows are
out? Do you remember which opponent
had Dandy Griffith, when it comes time
to Steal a Star? Stay alert.
Now let us consider programming
strategy in the following three cases:
1. The player with all high rated shows.
You would think such a player would not
have to worry about the competition. He
need only fill the Prime Time Span with
his highest rated shows, and watch his
opponents die. Actually, it’s not so
simple. No show is strong enough by
itself to be totally secure because other
players can augment their program-
ratings by the addition of Bonus Tiles,
Best Network News and Promotion
bonuses. Bonus tiles are of four types:
popular Stars (+10, +20 or +30 pts.),
Emmy Awards (+50 pts.), Critics’ Choice
(up to +36 pts.) or Viewers’ Views (up to
January 1997 21
+29 pts.). A show may be augmented
with only one Bonus tile. Best Network
News adds 5 pts. to the first show in the
8:00 time slot and continues as a 5 pt.
lead-in bonus for the network winning in
each subsequent time slot. Players
forking over $5000 get a 10 pt.
Promotion Bonus for all the programs in
their line-up. Hence, a 120 pt. Action
Special can be blasted into history by a
60 pt. Sitcom with the right combination
of lead-in bonus, Emmy and Promotion
Bonus.
There is another consideration:
counter-programming. For each
network scheduling programs of the
same type in the same time slot, your
program-rating is reduced by 10 pts. If
two other Networks put up Action
programs against your vaunted Action
Special, even a 40 pt. Sitcom with the
bonuses would beat it!
Thus, prudence becomes even the
Mighty. If you see that your opponents
possess powerful Stars and Emmies
(you can’t be sure about their Critics’
Choice/Viewers’ Views tiles since they
are face-down and used only once), it
might be prudent to stuff your schedule
with your worst shows. Better to lose a
10 pt. show to a souped-up Sitcom than
your 90 pt. best. Your opponents can
only use their Emmy once and $5000
spent on Promotion is gone forever.
Opponents can’t keep spending $5000 a
turn for long and hope to win.
Of course, if your opponents suspect
you would be so devious as to schedule
junk, they might save their Emmy and
their Promotions for a later sweep and
beat you with an unadorned middle-
rated show. So it’s a bluffing game.
Think vs. counter-think.
Nevertheless, it is better to be in this
category, with a handful of block-busters
than in the next category . . . .
2. The player with mostly middle-rated
shows. Middle-rated shows are not
likely to win contests, but you can at
least hope they won’t get canceled. A
program that doesn’t get canceled, for
whatever reason, is almost as valuable
as the program with the highest rating.
 22 The Boardgamer Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997

Sweeping The Sweeps (Cont.)

Short middle-rated shows are more show, take stock of which “Bulletin”
valuable in this regard than long middle- cards have come up. One Bulletin card PBM Ladders
rated shows. I would rather own
“Petting Place” (30 minutes; 60 pts.) and
“Wheel of Misfortune” (30 minutes; 60
pts.) than “The B-Team” (60 minutes; 60
pts.) even though the two shorter shows
have the same total value. Elimination
of a rival’s low-rated show in the first
half-hour time slot can expose “The B-
Team” to elimination by another
network’s high rated show. But, if
“Petting” is scheduled ahead of “Wheel”,
only “Wheel” is threatened.
Let’s face it. Middle-rated shows are a
liability, unless bolstered by Bonus tiles
and Promotion cash. They are not
strong enough to survive on their own,
and they are too valuable to lose. Wise
players use high-rating shows to protect
lower rated ones, of course, but a
second important principle is to use low-
rated shows, as sacrificial lambs, to
protect the middle-rated shows. The
certain loss of a 10 pt. show is
preferable to probable loss of a 60 pt.
one.
3. The player will all low-rated shows is
losing, so he can play for fun. Since he
will likely get only one new show per
turn, he should bid for long ones to
cover the Prime Time span. It’s not so
bad. After his single long show gets
knocked out of the schedule, he can
enjoy watching his opponent’s programs
go back to the box. If he fills his
schedule with short programs, on the
other hand, only his programs will get
canceled and Chapter 11 looks ahead.
earns you $500 per each 30 minutes of
Action programming, but another
penalizes you the same amount. If the
“Action series are ‘in’” card has come up
but “Consumer boycott” still lurks in the
deck, schedule your Action shows in the
line-up. If the reverse is true, schedule
another type of show and hold onto
Action.
And a final question to test your
knowledge of TV Wars minutiae. (I
couldn’t think of enough questions to
make an entire quiz.) You are allowed
one 120 minute program and one 90
minute program at the start of the game.
Which type should you choose for
each?
Answer: a 120 minute Action and a 90
minute Drama. Only in this way do you
have a chance of getting a 90 pt. show
in these categories.
TV Wars
December 3, 1996 8 Active Players
1. Eric Wrobel 1571 AB-A5
2. Josh Dunn 1536 AB-A5
3. Michael Destro 1524 AD-A5
4. Lauren Vessey 1524 AC-A5
Advanced Squad Leader
A PBM ladder has been started by
Russ Gifford. Contact Russ at 320 E.
27th Street, Sioux City, NE 68766.
(414) 494-8746.
Across Five Aprils
A ladder is being set up for both PBM
and PBEM. Contact Andy Lewis, 16
Gosling Drive, Lewes, DE 19958.
(302) 644-1984. Em ail:
alewis16@aol.com.
Panzerblitz
Paul Martin (1917 St. Laurent Blvd.
#1914; Ottawa, ON K1G 3P8;
Canada) in running this PBEM ladder.
Contact Paul for details.
War At Sea
Paul Martin (1917 St. Laurent Blvd.
#1914; Ottawa, ON K1G 3P8;
Canada) is planning to start this ladder.
A mailing is planned to go out to
potential participants in January 1997.
Contact Paul for details.
Stalingrad
This ladder is active with at least 4
participants. There is always room for
more. Contact John B. Grant, Jr. (198
Brookdale Road; Stamford, CT 06903)
for details.

Two final considerations: some uses of

low-rated programs have already been
suggested, but another use of junk-
programs is as a dumping ground for
negative Critics’ Choice/Viewers’ Views.
These nasty tiles have to be used
somewhere, not on your “Shoegun”
heaven forbid! Kamikaze programs are
best left for late evening, so as not to
spoil the chance to garner the lead-in
bonus earlier. Thirty-minute garbage is
best suited for the purpose. Two of
these junk-shows can neutralize a
couple of negative “Bonus” tiles for less
than $2000. Using bad “Bonus” tiles on
longer shows is more expensive.

If you are faced with the probable loss of

an Action show or some other type of
 The Boardgamer Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997 23

History Of The World

PBEM Ladder Rules
by Greg Courter
There has been a PBEM History Of The - Everyone can play in, at most, two - If a player drops out, note that they will
World ladder competition going on for games at a time. get zero (0) points. Another person can
some time on Genie. Recently, the first take over that position prior to Epoch 6.
al email game of people on different - Games positions are first come first If another player takes over a position, it
online services was started, and served with the following stipulations: will be handled as if they started the
hopefully in the near future there will be 1) Players not currently in a game game for point and AREA concerns. If a
a game on the Virtual Wargamer’s HQ get dibs. player has a pressing need (health, etc.)
on the Internet (www.manzana.com). If 2) Everyone on the ladder must be to drop, they will not be penalized and
you are interested, contact Greg at available to moderate games - will be put on the inactive list.
GCOURTER@genie.geis.com. dibs for open game slots go to
the player with the most games - Any game issues will be arbitrated by
PBEM Ladder Rules moderated. the GM. If need be the Keeper of the
3) Another tie-breaker is number of Ladder has final say.
- All games will be AREA rated ladder games (completes plus
(something to keep Glenn Petroski busy current) played. The person - Please let the Keeper of the Ladder
with). with fewer games gets first know if you need to take an extended
crack. leave and if your electronic mail address
- Each position in a game will be rated changes.
based on finish. All games should have - Moderator rules will need to be
6 players but in no case will any have formalized, but basically would be that if - Most importantly, have fun.
less than 4. You will get points based a turn is wrong or illegal, you back up all
on finish as follows: following moves until the turn matches History of the World PBEM
the correct result. Guidelines
4 Player Game
1st place 7 points - There will be 2 different values for the - All games will be run by a moderator.
2nd place 5 points ladder - total points and average This person will be the final arbiter of
3rd place 2 points position. The average will be the ladder any issues or questions. Games may
4th place 1 point order, total (and AREA rating) for be "normal" or "bidding".
breaking ties and for another way of
5 Player Game looking at things. - It is suggested that all players swap
1st place 10 points phone numbers with the GM. This will
2nd place 7 points - Games may follow the normal rules or allow them to communicate problems
3rd place 3 points the bidding rules as defined in The such as modem or computer failure or
4th place 2 points General. Players will specify which other things that might cause them to be
5th place 1 point game type they want to play in and the "AWOL".
GM will accumulate the players. The
6 Player Game optional rules (11.2 Preservation of - Games will be played using the Honor
1st place 10 points Culture and 11.3 Fortresses) may be System. That is, the player taking the
2nd place 7 points used at the GM's discretion. Again this turn is responsible for rolling all dice,
3rd place 5 points must be defined before the game both attack and defence. The player
4th place 3 points begins. then reports the results of the turn to the
5th place 2 points rest of the group.
6th place 1 point - Any changes to the ladder rules must
be voted on and passed by a plurality of - Play can be by e-mail, or by posting to
(7 Player Game?) the current ladder players who vote a central board. This is determined by
1st place 10 points within 1 week of the question. the capabilities of the players.
2nd place 7 points
3rd place 5 points - Use common curtesy. When you will - The moderator will draw all cards for
4th place 4 points be away for any length of time (over 2 the players.
5th place 3 points days is a good measure) be sure to let
6th place 2 points the GM and other players know. Turns - Any "secret" information will be passed
7th place 1 point should take no longer than 2 days to by e-mail only (such as the event cards
turn around. Consistent tardiness or and empire cards drawn by each
Dropping out of game results in 0 points. extended leaves without notification can player).
result in having your position turned
Bonus: Score/100, drop any fractions over to a backup player or expulsion - In a bidding game, the GM will either
from the ladder. randomly pick a player to place the
Bonus: +1 if you beat the next place Sumerians or the GM may place them.
opponent by >= 50 victory points.
 24 The Boardgamer Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997

History Of The World PBEM Ladder (Cont.)

This will be done prior to the first round
of bidding. In a 7 player game, the
Sumerians will be an available empire to
be bid on.
- In a non-bidding game, the GM will,
one at a time, e-mail the appropriate
player the empire drawn and who it may
be passed to. That player will then post
or send e-mail to all players and the GM
specifying the card's use. When there is
only one empire left, the GM will email
this information to the "drawing" player
and the player who receives it, and will
e-mail or post the first player's turn.
- The players will then begin taking their
turns. When one empire finishes, the
other players should check that turn for
errors. If they find none, the next
empire can begin.
- To speed play, the GM should tell the
player if the empire held follows one that
is missing that Epoch. This will allow
that player to start play as soon as
possible without waiting for that
information later.
- To speed play, a player who has an
army (armies) that must retreat should
try to specify as soon as possible,
preferrably as soon as the previous
empire completes its turn.
- Errors: It is quite possible that a turn
can be in error. This is usually due to
someone missing a difficult terrain
defense but this is not the only reason.
If an error occurs, the GM can (in order
of preference):
1) Reroll the erroneous attack. This
usually is just rolling additional
dice. If there is no change, the
turn stands. If an attack fails
which had originally succeeded,
then you "roll back" the turn.
[i.e. If one attacking army lost,
then the final attempted attack
of the turn does not occur. If 2
were lost, then the last 2 attacks
did not o c c u r . Th i s c a n
obviously result in a changed
score. If the incorrect attack
succeeds when it originally
failed, then the player will get
one or more additional armies
to attack with, and will be told to
complete the turn.
2) Rerun the turn from the point of the
first error. This should be used
only when there are many
errors or the outcome would
not be too effected.
3) Replay the entire turn. Obviously
this is only to be used in
extreme cases.
As always, the GM has discretion.
Use common sense.
- Players should always look to keep the
game moving. Let the others know
when you will be gone for more than a
couple days, etc.
- At the end of each Epoch, the GM will
post or email all players a summary of
the board and player positions for
verification prior to the beginning of the
next epoch and at the end of the game.
- If played for ladder position, all games
must be registered with the Keeper of
the Ladder prior to play and reported
when completed.
- As always, the main issue is good
sportsmanship and fun.

History of the World Ladder (12/2/96) Greg Courter :)er

Keeper of the History of the World
Pos Player/Mod AREA Ladder # Total PBEM Ladder
Address Rating Rating Gms Wins Points GCOURTER@GENIE.COM

1 Eric Kirchner 12.0 1 1 12

e.kirchner@genie.com
2 Michael Newman 1534 ACA-6 10.0 2 1 20
NAVCON IV
m.newman2@genie.com This naval games convention will be held
3 George Young 1528 AEAA6 9.5 2 1 19 in Washington, DC from February 14-16,
g.young20@aol.com 1997. Board games featured will include
4 Mike Stachowski 1486 AE-B6 8.0 1 0 8 Fifth Fleet, Enemy In Sight, Attack Sub,
mlstack@moran.com Wooden Ships & Iron Men, Victory In
5 Bob O'Connor 7.0 1 0 7 The Pacific and War At Sea. Special
r.oconnor6@genie.com guest gamemaster will be bestselling
6 Jeff Miller 1521 ACAA6 6.0 1 0 6 author and game designer Larry Bond.
blachorn@aol.com
6 Greg Courter/1 1493 ABAA6 6.0 1 0 6 For info, E-mail Jim Fleckenstein at
gcourter@genie.com NAVYMEML@NAVY-MEMORIAL.ORG,
7 Bruce Monnin/1 1479 AGAB6 4.0 2 0 8 or write to:
monninb@bright.net
8 John Grant/1 1493 ACA-6 3.5 2 0 7 NAVCON IV
j.grant16@GENIE.COM U.S. Navy Memorial Foundation
9 Steve Quarterman 3.0 1 0 3 701 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
q-s.bren@genie.com Suite 123
10 Marc Guenette 1493 ACA-6 2.0 1 0 2 Washington, DC 20004
m.guenette@GENIE.COM
11 Patti Miller 1493 ACA-6 1.5 2 0 3 One price registration fee is $10 by
blachorn@aol.com 2/3/97; $15 thereafter. Convention T-
12 Robbie Robberson 1493 ACA-6 0.0 1 0 0 shirts cost an extra $5.
???
 The Boardgamer
Pre-ASL AREA Recreation
Bill Thomson has been working hard
recently to reconstruct the AREA ratings
for the original Squad Leader series and
its gamettes (Cross of Iron, Crescendo
of Doom and G.I.: Anvil of Victory). This
involves recreating the results from the
first 6 Avaloncon conventions as well as
games played online among members
of the SLlist. If you have any
documentation of previous AREA
games played, be sure to forward this
information to Bill.
You will notice on the next page that this
research is still incomplete and that
there are no numerical AREA ratings
yet. Hopefully, these will be available
for the next issue.
The AREA ratings for Pre- Advanced
Squad Leader (one combined rating for
SQL, COI, COD, GIAV) is nearing the
functional form of the reconstruction
process. The present database has 168
posted games involving 67 players
tracing back to 1978. Including those
names of past Avaloncon mailing lists
provided by TAHGC, a total of 91
players have been identified. If you are
are one of these persons for which there
are presently have no games in the
database, I seek any records you may
have or memory of any past Avaloncon
participation. The tracking of past
Avaloncon events 91-96 are on the
SQUAD LEADER ACADEMY'S home
page (http://zim.com /BThom son).
Several 'holes' exists in these records
as other players know where they won
and lost but not who they played. The
PARS (Pre-ASL Rating System) file
exists on this home page as well (multi
sheet form ula laden Exc el 5.0
wo r kb o ok ). Pl ea s e s en d a n y
information you may have to me via
snail mail or email or phone at the below
numbers:
SQUAD LEADER ACADEMY
Phone:
daytime/voice mail: 561-739-3591
evenings-weekend: 954-742-8617
E-mail:
SQLA@zim.com, or
bthomson@zim.com
Address:
P.O. Box 3756
Boynton Beach, FL 33424-2756
Volume 2, Issue 1
Update October 1996
by Bill Thomson
As the player base is largely
represented by the SLlist email group
(Eric Pass; epass@nyx.net) with 100+
members, the SLlist is taking over the
responsibility for the creation and
maintenance of the Pre-ASL AREA
rating system. The administration of the
Pre-ASL AREA rating system after the
previous records have been recreated is
still under negotiation, but will most
probably be handled by the Squad
leader Academy. Many on the SLlist
wish for autonomy from the ASL
administrator Russ Gifford. This is as
the SLlist community does not wish to
be a subset, or lesser priority, or under
the administration of a player body not
involved with Pre-ASL. AS stated
before, the administation of Pre-ASL will
probably be maintained by the Squad
Leader Academy with constant effort
being made to coordinate information
between the AREA administrators and
related publications.
Here are the key points of the Pre-ASL
AREA rating system:
1) There will e one combined rating for
Squad Leader (SQL), Cross Of Iron
(COI), Crescendo Of Doom (COD) and
GI: Anvil of Victory (GIAV).
2) Presently accepting records from any
time frame. Most can be confirmed via
cross referencing other players.
3) Standings to be published quarterly
in the BOARDGAMER magazine. The
SQLA home page to be updated
monthly.
4) Current administrator is Bill
Thomson /SQLA which is indirectly a
subset of the SLlist. The full file is kept
on my home page and in the SLlist
archive for backup redundancy.
Additionally, files are backed up
automatically on several drives/
locations.
5) The standings are to be 'active' for
some time as records will be added
chronologically as players are tracked
down. Feel free to help identify current
addresses as the records go back to
1978 and some players have relocated.
January 1997 25
6) Even if you no longer play Pre-ASL
any records or partial records would be
greatly appreciated.
7) Players without a game result in
TWO YEARS will be considered inactive
for the quarterly posting of standings.
However all records are in the database
should activity be resumed.
8) Tentatively, there will be no
provisional/verified differentiation. The
same formula will apply to the first
games played as is used for all the other
games.
Other SLlist/SQLA activities:
- email ladder - (Alan Yngve)
- scenario record - (Chabot)
- discussion group - (Eric Pass)
- compiled Q/A - (Roland Gettliffe)
- SQL4th edition soft copy rule book in
MSword 6.0 - (Thomson et al)
- SQL5th edition project in progress to
integrated all Q/A - (Edwards/
Thomson/ Yngve)
- A composite rule book; single rule set
for SQL-GIAV play - (Edwards/
Thomson)
- SQL and COI email tournaments -
(Yngve/Thomson)
- Av a l o n c o n 9 7 SQ L a n d CO I
tournaments - (Thomson/Welsh/Pollard)
- Jaxcon97 SQL tournaments (TRC
also) - (Pollard/Thomson)
- SQLA newsletter - (Thomson)
- SQLA Library of SQL tools -
(Thomson)
- COI 4th edition soft copy rule book -
(Ulen/Thomson)
- AREA/PARS - (Thomson)
 26 The Boardgamer Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997

Current Pre-ASL AREA Records AHIKS

Mid-November 1996 The AHIKS International
by Bill Thomson Wargamer’s Society is a great
The Pre-ASL AREA ratings presently are lacking AREA values as the database expands resource for those who do not
weekly due to an extensive letter writing and player history investigation. AREA ratings will have a good supply of FTF
be calculated after current investigation of past games is completed. Below is a simple opponents and desire quality
ranking by winning percentage of games played; 203 games logged; 52 players with game PBM competition.
history; 33 others listed. Six+ games are needed for Verified status; 2 year activity period. AHIKS main function is to
# serve as a matching service
Rank PARS# Name W L D W-L Win % Games Qual Status to pair members who wish to
play the same game. If a
1 KW-01 Kevin Welsh 10 1 0 9 0.909 11 C Verified m at ch r eq u est c an n ot
2 SR-01 Scott Romanowski 9 1 0 8 0.900 10 B Verified immediately be filled, it is
3 BL-01 Brian Laskey 8 1 0 7 0.889 9 B Verified published in the AHIKS
4 AY-01 Alan Yngve 6 1 0 5 0.857 7 B Verified newsletter to help encourage
5 ES-01 Eric Stranger 15 7 0 8 0.682 22 E Verified other members to accept the
6 FW-01 Fred Wexler 15 8 0 7 0.652 23 E Verified requested match.
7 PP-01 Pete Pollard 10 6 0 4 0.625 16 D Verified
8 PB-01 Patrick Barker 4 3 0 1 0.571 7 B Verified Besides its primary function of
9 BT-01 Bill Thomson 52 37 3 15 0.565 92 M Verified providing members with
10 MG-02 Mark Gionet 8 7 0 1 0.533 15 C Verified opponents for play-by-mail
11 KT-01 Kieth Turner 7 8 0 -1 0.467 15 C Verified games, AHIKS also provides
12 MH-01 Michael Handiboe 4 5 0 -1 0.444 9 B Verified the following services:
13 EF-01 Ed Fritz 3 4 0 -1 0.429 7 B Verified 1) A workable PBM system
14 AK-01 Allen Kaplan 3 4 0 -1 0.429 7 B Verified which includes sets of random
15 TE-01 Ted Ewen 2 5 0 -3 0.286 7 B Verified numbers sent to players to
16 ER-01 Eric Redstone 3 8 0 -5 0.273 11 C Verified replace die rolls and stock
17 PR-01 Paul Reinert 4 10 1 -6 0.267 15 C Verified tables.
18 CE-01 Chris Edwards 2 7 0 -5 0.222 9 B Verified 2) A bimonthly newsletter
19 JR-01 James Roche 1 5 0 -4 0.167 6 B Verified filled with open match request
20 JM-02 Jeff Miller 3 0 0 3 1.000 3 A Provisional lists, gaming related articles,
21 SE-01 Stefan Eriksson 2 0 0 2 1.000 2 A Provisional society news and much more.
22 TF-01 Tony Faro 2 0 0 2 1.000 2 A Provisional 3) The judge, an impartial
23 MM-01 Mark Manitzas 2 0 0 2 1.000 2 A Provisional rules arbiter available to
24 JC-01 John Cannady III 1 0 0 1 1.000 1 A Provisional resolve rules questions.
25 DH-01 David Hooton 1 0 0 1 1.000 1 A Provisional 4) The PBEM Coordinator to
26 MW-01 Mark Walker 1 0 0 1 1.000 1 A Provisional help find electronic mail
27 AL-01 Alan Lipka 4 1 0 3 0.800 5 A Provisional opponents.
28 PM-01 Pete Maloney 2 1 0 1 0.667 3 A Provisional 5) The Unit Counter Pool to
29 SW-01 Steve Williams 2 1 0 1 0.667 3 A Provisional replace that one missing
30 CL-01 Chuck Leonard 2 2 0 0 0.500 4 A Provisional counter from your otherwise
31 JM-01 Jim Minnow 1 1 0 0 0.500 2 A Provisional complete favorite game.
32 EP-01 Eric Pass 1 1 0 0 0.500 2 A Provisional 6) Th e Multi- Pl ay er
33 OS-01 Oscar Scholten 1 1 0 0 0.500 2 A Provisional Coordinator to help arrange
34 RW-01 Russ Woods 1 1 1 0 0.333 3 A Provisional for matches in multi-player
35 ED-01 Eric Dunsmore 0 4 0 -4 0.000 4 A Provisional games.
36 LM-01 Linden Moore 0 4 0 -4 0.000 4 A Provisional 7) Courteous, dependable
37 AC-02 Andrew Cowdery 0 2 0 -2 0.000 2 A Provisional competition. Members with a
38 KR-01 Ken Rutkowski 0 2 0 -2 0.000 2 A Provisional history of dropping out of
39 JT-01 Joe Thomas 0 2 0 -2 0.000 2 A Provisional games or otherwise behaving
40 NW-01 Nathan Wallace 0 2 0 -2 0.000 2 A Provisional unethically can face expulsion
41 BE-01 Bill Wells 0 2 0 -2 0.000 2 A Provisional from the society.
42 JB-02 James Bouffard 0 1 0 -1 0.000 1 A Provisional
43 HB-01 Herb Boutilier 0 1 0 -1 0.000 1 A Provisional To join AHIKS, or for more
44 SC-01 Stephen Chin-quee 0 1 0 -1 0.000 1 A Provisional information, contact the
45 PC-01 Patrick Coyne 0 1 0 -1 0.000 1 A Provisional BOARDGAMER at 177 South
46 PF-01 Pete Fecurka 0 1 0 -1 0.000 1 A Provisional Lincoln Street, Minster, Ohio
47 EJ-01 Elliot Jackson 0 1 0 -1 0.000 1 A Provisional 45865. You will be put in
48 RJ-01 Rich Josephus 0 1 0 -1 0.000 1 A Provisional contact with your Regional
49 TK-01 Tony Kurilla 0 1 0 -1 0.000 1 A Provisional Director who will provide you
50 KO-01 Ken Oates 0 1 0 -1 0.000 1 A Provisional with more information about
51 MR-03 Michael Reffue 0 1 0 -1 0.000 1 A Provisional AHIKS as well as your
52 MR-01 Mike Rickman 0 0 1 0 0.000 1 A Provisional membership application.
 The Boardgamer
A Union Opening Strategy
I have discovered an opening strategy
for the Union player that uses the fact
that the first Confederate forces to enter
the board come on in a corner. By
carefully arranging his cavalry, and
taking some early risks, the Union
p l a y er c a n s ev er el y l im it t h e
Confederate player’s ability to maneuver
to gain reasonable attack odds.
The defense sets up as follows (see
Diagram 1):
Buford - P3
Gamble - Q2
Devin - R2
Reynolds - O6
Wadsworth - O6
Here are three reasonable Confederate
replies (all others are similar or worse):
A. Heth - R1
B. Heth - R1
Pegram - S2
C. Heth and Pegram do not enter the
board.
Option A isn’t pleasant. There is a 21%
chance that Heth will be annihilated plus
a 16% chance of a Heth step loss by the
end of turn 2. How does this work? If
Heth wins the combat, but causes less
than 2 step losses, he can be
counterattacked at even odds. If he
retreats as a result of his attack, it must
be to S1. Again he can be attacked at
even odds, plus now he is pinned
against the board edge with no avenue
Diagram 1. Turn 1 Union Defense
Volume 2, Issue 1
Gettysburg ‘88
by Ray Freeman
of retreat. Any adverse result will cause
casualties. If he suffers losses on his
attack, he now gets hit at +2, and is
likely to die. Finally, even if Heth suffers
no losses, there is a 19% chance that
the position will be functionally similar to
option C after 2 turns.
Option B isn’t so wonderful either. Heth
will get a +3 attack on Gamble (with a
28% probability of failure), but to get that
Pegram has to attack Devin at -1 and
will take casualties 36% of the time.
Plus, there is a very real danger (18%)
that Heth and Pegram could interfere
with each other’s ability to retreat and
caus e a dditional loss es. The
probabilities are too complicated to
spend the time coming up with exact
numbers, but it looks pretty scary to me.
Under Option C, the Confederate player
simply loses a turn, and then has to face
this defense (see Diagram 2):
Wadsworth - R2
Devin - Q2
Buford - Q2
Gamble - Q2
The best Confederate move then is to
bring on Hill, Heth and Pender to S2 and
attack Wadsworth at +4. This is fine,
but Pegram and McIntosh must stay off
the board as there is a 21% chance that
Hill will be repulsed, so S1 must be kept
open as a retreat square.
What is particularly frustrating about this
is that if the Union sets up his cavalry on
turn 1 in say R1 and S2, Heth and
Diagram 2. Turn 3 Rebel Attack
January 1997 27
Pegram could enter at either P1 or S4,
according to rule 3c. This is a hell of a
lot better than any of the three options
listed above. The Union defense I have
shown cleverly uses the rules and the
limits of the board to force the
Confederate player into making poor
odds frontal assaults or losing a lot of
time. The additional risks for the Union
player over other defenses are
negligible. Light Union forces are
relatively expendable, Confederate
infantry is not. Note that none of this
would be possible if the Terrain Chart
hadn’t lopped off that corner of the
board.
This aggressive defense is part of an
overall strategy designed to take
advantage of the very poor coordination
of the Confederate forces early in the
game. If the Union can slow the Rebels
coming down the Chambersburg Pike
enough to allow the Union army to
occupy the line Oak Ridge - Q5 -
McPherson’s Woods on turn 3, then
Ewell and Rodes face a rather scary
entrance to the board. As in the real
battle, an aggressive but intelligent
delaying action by Buford’s cavalry is
the key to disrupting the Confederate’s
timetable on the first day, with
potentially far reaching consequences
as the battle continues.
An Illustrative Battle
To illustrate the Union strategy of
constricting the entry options of the
Confederates coupled with aggressive
tactics to intimidate and/or cause
 28 The Boardgamer
Gettysburg ‘88 (Cont.)
casualties, I have played out a game
through three turns using the basic
rules.
Turn 2
The Union forces set up as advertised
on turn 1 and the Confederates choose
option B as being “safe but not wimpy”
as far as protection of Heth goes.
Heth attacks Gamble at +3.
The DR is C5/U7, net +1.
Gamble retreats to P2.
Heth advances to Q2.
Pender attacks Devin at -1.
The DR is C9/U8, net =.
Pender retreats to S1.
Doubleday to I5.
Wainwright to H5.
Robinson to H4.
Barlow & Reynolds to G4.
Howard, Osbourne & Schurz to L6.
Gamble to P1.
Wadsworth to Q3.
Devin to R2.
Gamble, Devin & Wadsworth attack
Heth at =.
The DR is U6/C2, net +4.
Heth loses a step and retreats to R1.
Gamble advances to Q2.
Turn 3
Heth to S1.
Hill, Pender & McIntosh to R1.
Lately, requests are coming in from
G am eMa s t er s a n d T o u r n am en t
Directors. There is a very definite
interest in running AREA SANCTIONED
tournaments and events. This has been
an AREA vision since Russ and I took
charge. Like everything else with
AREA, it has come upon us sooner than
we are able to prepare. This is not
deterring us. We continue to ask
patience as we pull together what is
needed. What you ask for, we intend to
deliver.
Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997
Hill, Pender & McIntosh attack Gamble very unpleasant situation for the
& Devin at +3. Confederates.
The DR is C3/U3, net +3.
Gamble loses a step and retreats to P2. Obviously the Union will not get results
Devin retreats to R3. like this in every game. In some games
Hill, etc. advance to Q2. he may get his cavalry whacked without
causing any casualties. Less probable,
Doubleday to S5. but still a reasonable possibility, is for
Wainwright to R5. the Union to get lucky and crush Heth
Robinson to R6. before Hill arrives. Whatever occurs,
Reynolds & Barlow to S8. excepting for disastrous die rolls, I
Wadsworth to R2. believe this approach will give the Union
Howard, Osbourne & Schurz to Q3. player a superior position to what he
Buford, Devin & Gamble to P2. might achieve by more passive defense.
Gettysburg ‘88 has a combat system
Union groups at R2, Q3 and P2 attack that rewards the aggressive, offensive
Hill at +2. minded player. There is no reason for
The DR is U3/C9, net -4. the Union to wait for the victory point
Osbourne loses a step. areas at Culp’s Hill and Cemetery Ridge
Wadsworth retreats to S3. t o be t hr eat en ed bef or e
Howard retreats to P3. counterattacking.
Buford retreats to O2.
Hopefully, the readers have been Gettysburg ‘88
following this play on the board and can December 3, 1996 25 Active Players
view the position at the start of the
Confederates fourth turn. So far the 1. Allen Kaplan 1781 CF-C6
2. Michael Uhrich 1750 DGBC5
dice have been pretty even. The Rebs
3. Vince Meconi 1729 CFBD6
have lost one step of infantry, while the
4. David Zimmerman 1718 FIBD6
Yanks have lost one of cavalry and one 5. John Poniske, Sr. 1708 CEBC6
of artillery. Note that the Union forces 6. Charles Hamm 1631 BDAB6
occupy very solid defensive positions on 7. Robert Mull 1596 AC-A6
both fronts and have prevented the 8. Jeff Cierniak 1585 BE-B5
army of Northern Virginia from uniting 9. John Scivolette 1579 CG-C5
Hill and Ewell. For now they are unable 10. Michael Sims 1553 AB-A6
to support each other. If Ewell and 11. Stephen Scott 1535 AA-A4
Rodes enter the board, they can be 12. John Welage 1530 AB-A5
attacked at +2 or perhaps more. A 13. John Selders 1528 AB-A5
cautious Gray leader may wait until turn 14. Michael Ellsworth 1510 AB-A6
5 to bring on Ewell and Rodes. This is a 15. Randy Schilb 1508 AB-A6
A.R.E.A. News
Tournaments
by Glenn Petroski
AREA is an information pool. The chief on we will define it more closely. For
criterion for an AREA endorsement is a now, this is what AREA has.
wi l li n g n es s t o s h ar e wh a t ev er
information that you may have. One For starters, contact AREA six months
step beyond that is to acquire more in advance. Please enclose a financial
information and forward that to AREA. contribution. I want to suggest $10, but
This is the premise under which we will settle for $5. As I write, I have no
operate. idea what this is going to cost. I am
sure that the individual $1 charge will
What is an AREA sanctioned event? not cover it. This shows that you are
What are the requirements? At this putting some thought into this thing and
early stage, I can provide only an that it is not simply a passing fancy.
outline, a place to start. As time goes
 The Boardgamer
A.R.E.A. News (Cont.)
On this initial contact, explain to AREA
what you intend to do. What game titles
do you plan to play? What formats?
How many GMs? Do you have any
experience? Are you doing anything
about problems that you, or others,
encountered in the past? There are no
wrong answers. AREA’s interest is
knowing that you have thought this
through and are on your way to a
successful event.
The main reason for the contact is so
that we can exchange information
before the fact. The exchange is to be
two-way. What AREA can provide in
trade for what you have. AREA’s half is
included further down this article.
AREA sanctioned events must be ALL
AREA RATED. Be up front about this.
All officials, players, and participants
should know this before they become
involved in any way. If there is any
objection to AREA or AREA ratings,
their only recourse should be to not
participate. No hard feelings, this is just
the way it is.
All games that are part of the event are
to be reported by the GM running the
event, not by the individual players. The
GM will report every game in the event,
without exception.
Along with the GM report or tournament
results and games actually played,
AREA wants player's names and
addresses. Every tournament will add
new players. For these, the basic
information is necessary. For players
already listed, the address check is
helpful. These veterans will have ID
numbers, and should know them.
Include the ID whenever possible.
For players that do not yet have, or do
not know their ID, list them with a
temporary ID. The temporary ID
consists of their current five digit zip
code and a decimal point, followed by
double zeros. It will be enough to go on
until AREA can track them farther.
Part of the information exchange also
includes the players. As stated earlier,
they are to be advised, in advance, that
this is an AREA sanctioned event.
AREA’s address is to be available to
them for comment. If they thought that it
was all great, so much the better! We
can do it again.
Volume 2, Issue 1
Any complaints that AREA receives will
be directed back to the Tournament
Director for consideration. It is up to the
TD to correct any problems with his own
tournament. The TD also needs to
assure AREA that these things are
being examined. No human endeavor is
ever perfect. In that light, it is our duty
to strive for continual improvement. The
only crime is ignoring difficulties.
If there will be open gaming, or pick up
games available at this event, AREA
chits must be available so that players
may report these games for AREA
rating. There is no way to force anyone
to rate these individual games, and no
one will be. This is how and where
newer players are introduced to games
and the hobby. This is a way to play a
more relaxed game, or to give that real
screwball idea a run for the money.
However, the option must be there if the
individuals want their particular game
AREA rated.
There are only three items that are likely
to cause an AREA endorsement to be
denied.
The first is a previous record of
numerous complaints from a number o
different sources. If you had an event in
the past that led to much unhappiness,
and are not taking steps of correction,
AREA certainly can not support your
efforts.
The second is lack of cooperation. If
your current efforts are uncooperative
with AREA or others in our hobby, do
not expect return favors. If your past
record of cooperation is lacking, we
need to work out how to make it better
for everyone. This is a hobby. No GM
or TD is expected to have tournament
records to AREA via overnight express,
but do get them in as soon as possible.
Records, notes, and materials that are
unaccounted for, incomplete, or
confusing, amount to responsibility.
The third is hobby feuding. If you are
involved in a public disagreement with
other members of our hobby, and your
event appears to be an extension of that
disagreement, AREA wants no part of it.
Take note that I wrote “appears”! It
does not matter whether the event
actually is a “feud” extension. If others
might perceive it as being that way,
January 1997 29
AREA will keep your efforts at arm’s
length. AREA is pleased to assist in
resolving disagreements and reconciling
our friendships. However, AREA will not
take sides, and will avoid being drawn
into disputes.
So, O.K. What is the exchange?
Everything that AREA can provide for
you at the time of your request!
Information!
- What game titles are currently AREA
rated?
- What titles can be AREA rated?
- What title can not be AREA rated?
Not many, but there are a few.
- AREA discourages single elimination
events. Want to know why?
- Maybe the approach you are planning
to use has been used by others. It may
or may not work well in certain
circumstances.
- As we collect written material on
different formats and tournament
procedures, they will be included. Only
two are now available, but more info is
being gathered.
Referral Services!
- GMs who have tried similar formats.
- GMs who are known authorities on the
games you intend to play.
- Retailers, manufacturers, and others
who support our hobby, and might
consider sponsoring or promoting your
event.
- Mailing lists of players in general.
- Mailing lists of game-specific players.
- Mailing lists of geographic-specific
players.
- Current rating lists of players by game
titles.
- Something else that you want to
know? Ask. AREA will do its best.
***************************
Please take note! AREA has moved!
The Petroski’s have a new address and
phone number. We remain eager to
hear from you!
At your service,
Glenn E.L. Petroski
6829 29th Avenue
Kenosha, WI 53143-1233
(414) 654-5044
 30 The Boardgamer Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997

Current Specific Game AREA Ratings

Up Front Great Campaigns Waterloo
December 6, 1996 142 Active Players December 4, 1996 17 Active Players
Of The American
1. Herbert Gratz
2. William Edwards III
2028
1975
DHAA5
HKEB6
Civil War Series 1. Kevin McCarthy
2. Larry Lingle
1866
1744
CC—5
AC-A5
3. Jeff Paull 1853 HLEB6
December 6, 1996 31 Active Players 3. Joseph Beard III 1635 BDCC6
4. Nicholas Cascone 1823 GI-I5 1. Trevor Bender 1687 BB—6 4. Eric Kirchner 1572 BC-A5
5. Donald Hawthorne 1811 GJ-I6 2. Scott Smith 1573 AB—6 5. James Penick 1555 ABE-6
6. John Emery 1799 DE-B6 3. Kenneth Lee 1542 AB-A5 6. Scott Goehring 1515 AAB-5
7. Larry Davidson 1777 EF-H5 4. Hugh Mater 1535 AA-A5 7. John Ellsworth 1514 ON—6
8. Ray Stakenas Sr. 1758 DE-C6 5. Jeffrey Lange Sr 1535 AA-A5 8. Carl Adamac 1512 AB-A5
9. James Murphy 1748 JK-I6 6. Walter Garman III 1535 AA-A5 9. Phillip Evans 1500 AB-A5
10. Stephen Buchholz 1748 CDD-6 7. Garth Germond 1535 AA-A5 10. Joseph Brooks 1500 ABC-5
11. Will Miner 1721 CF-A6 8. Tom Constantine 1535 AA-A5
12. Paul Lebowitz
13. Bruce Young
1680
1672
BE-G5
CEAB6
9. Bruce Maxwell 1535 AA-A5 Fortress Europa
10. Nick Frydas 1535 AA-A5 December 3, 1996 9 Active Players
14. Gregory Courter 1663 DFFC6 11. Jeffrey Otto 1535 AA-A5
15. Mark Dumas 1656 BE-A6 12. Mark Bailey 1535 AA-A5 1. Michael Newman 1960 DD-A5
16. Craig Tenhoff 1649 KK-I5 13. Michael Arnold 1535 AA-A5 2. James Eliason 1759 DGGC5
17. Michael Rodgers 1643 ABA-6 14. Forest Speck 1535 AA-A5 3. Charles Jehlen 1630 AAE-6
18. Richard Worden 1622 AC-A6 15. William O’Neal 1535 AA-A5 4. Trevor Bender 1561 AB-A5
19. Jeremy Billones 1611 DE-B6 16. Gordon Bliss 1535 AA-A5 5. Ed Druckman 1500 AA—5
20. William Conner 1611 CF-A5 17. Joseph Bellas 1532 AB-A5
21. John Hart 1606 EH-H5 18. Steven Katz 1500 AB-A5
22. Ray Stakenas Jr. 1594 CE-C6 Battle of the Bulge ‘81
23. James Matt 1583 BCDA6
24. Steve Huskey 1580 BE-A5 Main Battle Tank December 4, 1996 18 Active Players
25. Bill Henderson 1577 AC-A5 December 4, 1996 14 Active Players 1. Randy Heller 1928 EHCC6
26. Michael Reed 1571 GI-H5 2. John Grant, Jr. 1714 AB-A5
1. Robert Schoenen 1647 CD-C6
27. Robert Mull 1570 BD-A6 3. Daniel Tierney 1650 ABA-6
2. Bruce Young 1622 BC-B5
28. Blair Bellamy 1570 AC-A6 4. Bruno Sinigaglio 1593 AC-A6
3. Jon Cleaves 1588 AC-A5
29. Murray Cowles 1568 BD-A5 5. Phillip Evans 1561 AB-B5
4. Chuck Yingling 1559 AB-B5
30. Nick Vlahos 1567 CF-A5 6. Alan Libuszowski 1535 AAA-6
5. Kevin Schoenen 1542 AA—5
31. Jeff Kimmel 1566 AA—6 7. Henry Lowood 1531 AAA-6
6. John Emery 1537 AA-A5
32. Bruce Maxwell 1564 BE-A6
7. Jeff Kimmel 1505 AB-A6
33. Alan Emrich 1557 GI-H5
8. Kirk Bonnevier 1504 AB-A6 Third Reich 4th Edition
34. Brian Devitt 1556 CE-G5 December 4, 1996 10 Active Players
35. Maria Hawthorne 1552 BE-A6
36. David Gantt 1550 AB-A5 Russian Front 1. Charlie Corn 2017 DD—6
37. Bruce Schlickbernd 1546 FH-H5 December 4, 1996 12 Active Players 2. Michael Mitchell 1834 CEAA5
38. Thomas Drueding 1546 AB-A6 3. Bill Thomson 1600 ABB-6
1. Michael Mitchell 2024 GJP-5
39. Jeff Matthews 1545 AC-D5 4. Tony Haney 1561 BB—6
2. Patrick Flory 2006 DCG-5
5. Roger Cox 1501 AC-A5
3. Charles Sorbello 2000 BCG-5
War And Peace 4. James Bjorum 1997 DFI-5
December 4, 1996 10 Active Players 5. Alan Frappier 1995 EHE-5 Anzio
6. Timothy Greene 1885 FGM-5 December 4, 1996 5 Active Players
1. Nick Frydas 1785 BD—6 7. Thomas Gregorio 1883 EHG-5
2. Robert Beyma 1619 BD—6 8. James Falling 1835 BC—5 1. Thomas Oleson 1860 EFAB6
3. Marvin Rabin 1569 AB—5 9. Craig Clemens 1800 CEH-5 2. Mark Bayliss 1695 ABE-5
4. Matthew Burkins 1550 BD—6 10. John Laney 1750 ABD-5 3. Michael Sincavage 1557 AB-A5
5. Bryan Jackson 1542 BD—6 4. W Andrew York 1509 DDK-5
6. James Jordan 1535 AA—6 Stalingrad
December 4, 1996 10 Active Players D-Day ‘77
Wizard’s Quest December 4, 1996 7 Active Players
December 5, 1996 15 Active Players 1. Scott Goehring 2007 IJR-5
2. Joseph Beard III 1630 BCE-5 1. Lynn Barlow 2039 KLW-5
1. John Poniske, Jr. 1572 AE-A6 3. Johnny Hasay 1565 ABB-5 2. Joseph Beard III 1566 ABC-5
2. Mary Kratz 1518 AE-A6 4. Thomas Delaney 1535 AAB-5 3. John Ellsworth 1535 AAA-6
3. Kim Cresswell 1518 AE-A6 5. Daniel Leader 1535 AAA-5 4. William Putman 1535 AAA-5

Mustangs Panzergruppe Guderian D-Day ‘91

December 4, 1996 7 Active Players December 4, 1996 8 Active Players December 4, 1996 7 Active Players
1. Steven Chilcote 1570 AB-A5 1. Phillip Rennert 1605 AB-A6 1. Jack Morrell 1601 AB-A5
2. Charles Hamm 1568 AB—6 2. Michael Pustilnik 1535 AB-A6 2. Edward Snarski II 1535 AA-A5
3. Jeffrey Lange, Jr. 1500 AB-A5 3. John Keating Jr. 1500 AB-A6 3. Kevin McCarthy 1500 AC-B5
 The Boardgamer Volume 2, Issue 1 January 1997 31

Current Specific Game AREA Ratings

War At Sea Kingmaker Panzer Leader
December 4, 1996 63 Active Players December 6, 1996 17 Active Players December 6, 1996 40 Active Players
1. Bruce Monnin 1844 FJHE6 1. Steven Erdman 1708 BK—5 1. Bruce Wright 1751 CCD-6
2. Steve Packwood 1819 DG-D6 2. William Wible 1647 AH-A5 2. James McAden 1747 EGK-6
3. Philip Rennert 1800 DH-C6 3. George Sauer III 1643 Bl-B4 3. Danny Price 1707 CDEA6
4. Ray Freeman 1725 DG-C6 4. Justin Thompson 1641 BJ-A4 4. Kevin Kinsel 1601 CCD-6
5. Timothy Hitchings 1717 DH-C6 5. Heikki Thoen 1570 BI-E5 5. Eric Bonner 1593 FFM-6
6. Thomas Scarborough 1707 CEBB5 6. Tim Sullivan 1548 AB-A5 6. Fred Wexler 1592 BCE-5
7. Glenn Petroski 1686 BC—6 7. Paul Toro 1536 AG-A4 7. Jeff Wise 1582 CDE-6
8. Bruce Reiff 1679 BC-A6 8. Robert Beyma 1568 AB-A5
9. Vince Meconi 1650 DG-C6 New World 9. William Scott 1564 CF-A5
10. Robert Mull 1647 BD-A6 June 1, 1996 19 Active Players 10. Steve Shambeda 1537 AA-A5
11. Michael Knautz 1602 CE-B6 11. Tom Storey 1535 AAA-5
12. Jon Lockwood 1585 BE-C6 1. John Quarto-vonTivada 1536 AB-A5 12. Steve Andriakos 1535 AA-A5
13. Frank Cunliffe 1584 BE-D6 2. Frank Schmitt 1527 AD-A5 13. Michael Panteleano 1535 AA-A5
14. Philip Van Wiltenberg 1565 AC-A6 3. Trevor Bender 1527 AD-A5 14. Oscar Kenneth Oates 1514 DFJ-6
15. Joseph Beard III 1560 AB-B5 4. James Fuqua 1524 AD-A5 15. Roger Kyle-Keith 1502 AB-A5
16. Gary Moody 1547 BD-A6 5. Kirk Woller 1524 AD-A5 16. James Yen 1500 CCC-6
17. Joseph Powell 1547 AC-A6 6. Vanessa Sanabria 1524 AC-A5 17. Paul Martin 1500 AAA-5
18. Aaron Petroski 1535 AB—5 7. Bret Mingo 1524 AC-A5 18. Michael Noan 1500 AAA-5
19. Chuck Stapp 1530 BE-C6 8. Michael Anchors 1522 BB—6
20. John Pack 1528 DG-C6 1830
21. Paul Sommers 1528 BE-B5 Panzerblitz June 1, 1996 2 Active Players
22. Robert Fiorio 1525 AC-A6 June 1, 1996 25 Active Players
23. Patrick Richardson 1524 AC-A6 1. Bobby Laboon 1632 BB—6
24. John Welage 1513 BD-C6 1. David Giordano 1964 FHIB5
25. Michael Bailey
26. Alan Applebaum
1513
1509
AC-B5
AC-B5
2. John Hasay 1766
3. Oscar Kenneth Oates 1710
EE-A5
BCE-5
Diplomacy
December 6, 1996 88 Active Players
27. Carl Olson 1506 AC-A6 4. Fred Wexler 1640 EGJ-5
28. Gabriel Crowl 1505 AC-B5 5. Stephen Andriakos 1570 AA—5 1. Sylvain LaRose 1536 AH-A5
29. James Pei 1500 AB-B5 6. Charles Leonard 1556 DEAA5 2. Tom Kobrin 1536 AH-A5
7. Steven Sheftic 1546 BD-B5 3. Steve Elliot 1535 ADA-6
Blitzkrieg 8. Leslie Geraty 1535
9. Angelo Valeri1533 AB-A5
AAA-5 4. Louie Tokarz 1528 AFB-6
August 25, 1996 7 Active Players 5. Sean Smallman 1527 AH-A5
10. Michael West 1514 ABB-5 6. Steve Nicewarmer 1527 AH-A5
1. Glenn Petroski 1605 AB-A5 11. Mark Roman 1500 AAA-5 7. Dan Mathias 1527 AH-A5
2. John Laney 1535 AAA-5 12. Jeff Wise 1500 AAA-5 8. Greg Geyer 1524 AH-A5
3. Bob Henry 1532 AC—5 9. Joseph Abrams 1524 AF-A5
Platoon 10. Michael Cunningham 1521 AH-A5
Civilization June 1, 1996 6 Active Players 11. David Webster 1521 AF-A5
August 25, 1996 2 Active Players 12. Matthew Noah 1521 AF-A5
1. Kevin McCarthy 1603 AB-A5 13. Charles Ellsworth 1521 AF-A5
1. Beth Carlock 1550 BB-B6 2. Roger Knowles 1502 AB-A5 14. Stephen Koehler 1519 AF-A5
15. Mark Franceschini 1519 AF-A5
Decathlon Midway ‘65 16. William Schoeller 1519 AD-A5
December 3, 1996 5 Active Players 17. Thomas Pasko 1518 AF-A5
December 4, 1996 23 Active Players
18. Carl Willner 1516 AH-A5
1. Bobby Laboon 1520 AL-A5 1. Glenn Petroski 1641 CC—5 19. Catherine Lange 1515 AH-A5
2. John Coussis 1510 AL-A5 2. Bob Henry 1512 BC—5 20. Web Agnew 1515 AH-A5
3. Andrew Lewis 1505 AL-A5 21. Steven Cooley 1514 AH-A5
Israeli Defense Force 22. Hugh Turner 1512 AD-A5
Dune June 1, 1996 2 Active Players 23. William Thompson
24. Donald Williams
1512
1509
AD-A5
AH-A5
December 4, 1996 7 Active Players
1. Rob Schoenen 1535 AA—5 25. Rex Martin 1509 AH-A5
1. Roger Cox 1759 BB—6 26. Vincent Galarneau 1509 AH-A5
2. Keith Blackwell 1741 BB—6 Football Strategy 27. Lauren Cain 1509 AF-A5
3. Alan Camp 1719 BB—6 June 1, 1996 1 Active Players 28. David Tanier 1509 AD-A5
29. James Greb 1509 AD-A5
Empires In Arms 1. Michael Fitzgerald 1570 CECA5 30. Brian Ecton
31. Ed Rothenheber
1506
1506
AH-A5
AD-A5
December 6, 1996 15 Active Players
Civil War 32. Greg Fairbanks
33. Robert Wartenberg
1506
1505
AD-A5
AF-A5
1. James Chatham 1535 AD-A5 June 1, 1996 1 Active Players
2. Ed Slusarek 1518 AD-A5 34. Hudson Defoe 1503 AH-A5
3. Hwan Rhieu 1518 AD-A5 1. George Seary 1710 BB-A5 35. Scott Bowling 1503 AF-A5
 Advanced Squad
Leader
July 15, 1996 700+ Active Players
1. Gary Fortenberry 2279 KOE
2. Steven Pleva 2255 IMK
3. Bob Bendis 2136 GK*
4. Scott Drane 2106 LQK
5. Brian Youse 2032 NN*
6. Chad Cummins 2005 CF*
7. Robert Banozic 2002 GJ*
8. Phil Petry 1921 RL*
9. Patrik Manlig 1920 CEB
10. Louis Tokarz 1903 IO*
11. Guy Chaney 1888 DH*
12. Richard Summers 1868 JN*
13. Fred Ingram 1867 HJA
14. Jim McLeod 1854 FH*
15. Russ Gifford 1852 QRH
16. John Droesche 1830 CG*
17. Phillip Driscoll 1829 GHO
18. James Crawley 1820 CE*
19. Daryl Rothchild 1818 CB*
20. Evan Sherry 1795 BC*
21. Ross Sutton 1793 GL*
22. Lee Conner 1792 EF*
23. Dave Van kan 1791 DH*
24. Dade Cariaga 1788 DH*
25. Thomas Morin 1787 GJ*