Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
From the Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
Since the identification of glycolic acid oxidase in plants (1,2), procedure (1). Subsequent steps in the purification of the en-
the end products of this system have been repeatedly investi- zyme were followed exactly as described elsewhere (5,15). Prep-
gated. All enzyme preparations from plants (3-5), animals (6), aration of the enzyme from rat livers was essentially the same as
or microorganisms (7) have been reported to catalyze the oxida- from plants, and specific details have been described by Kun
tion of glycolic acid (COOH-CH20H) to glyoxylic acid (COOH- et al. (6). In this paper the activity of the enzyme was studied
CHO). Glyoxylic acid may be subsequently converted into mainly at four stages of purity: cell-free sap, ammonium sulfate
glycine (8, 9), which is the major product of this pathway in fractionation (l), alcohol fractionation (5), and as a solution of
most plant tissues in wivo (8). In vitro, glyoxylie acid may be the final purified enzyme of equivalent specific activity as pub-
plain the previous conflicting data on the oxidation of glyoxylic Glyoxylate, as well as glycolate, was oxidized by plant saps
acid. Oxalic acid may regulate the activity in vivo of the ubiq- and by an ammonium sulfate fractionated enzyme from rat liver
uitous and very active glycolic acid oxidase by limiting its own (Table I). Spinach sap, which had been reported not to oxidize
production and consequently diverting most of the glyoxylic glyoxylate (5), did not vigorously attack added glyoxylate, al-
acid to other products such as glycine. though it was capable of a rapid catalysis of glycolic acid oxida-
tion with the uptake of more than an atom of oxygen per mole
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
of glycolate consumed (Fig. 1). The uptake of an atom of oxy-
Preparation of cell-free sap and ammonium sulfate fractiona- gen per mole of glycolate was equivalent to the formation of a
tions from a variety of plants was identical with the original mole of glyoxylate and a mole of HzOz which in turn had been
oxidized to water and an atom of oxygen. After this initial
*Published with the approval of the Director of the Michigan
Agricultural Experiment Station as Jouranl Article No. 2717. rapid reaction with glycolate, the spinach sap catalyzed oxygen
t This research was aided by a grant from the National Science uptake at the same rate as that which occurred when the gly-
Foundation. oxylate was added as the substrate.
f Present address, Department of Physiological Chemistry and
Pharmacology, Ohio State University, Columbus 10, Ohio. 1 The abbreviation used is: FMN, flavin mononucleotide.
1280
May 1961 K. E. Richardson and N. E. Tolbert 1281
TABLE I at pH 7.3 (Fig. 3). The Michaelis constant for glyoxylate oxida-
Oxidation of glyoxylic acid by crude enzyme from various sources tion was found to be 5.4 x 10-3. The effect of enzyme concen-
Each system contained 20 pmoles of sodium glyoxylate. tration on reaction velocity is shown in Fig. 4.
The effect of Tris buffer on the oxidation of glyoxylate is
Enzyme source rl Ot/mg N/hr
shown in Table III. At these concentrations, Tris buffer had no
effect on glycolate oxidation, but it markedly inhibited glyoxylate
Tobacco sap .................................... 75
20 oxidation. In the usual assay for glycolic acid oxidase with
Sugar beet sap ..................................
Swiss chardsap ................................. 30 glycolate, glyoxylate oxidation was almost eliminated by the
Spinachsap ..................................... 7 combination of an adverse pH of 8.3 and the concentration of
Rat liver, ammonium sulfate fraction. 57 Tris buffer which was employed.
During the enzymatic oxidation of glyoxylate there was
essentially one atom of oxygen consumed per mole of glyoxylate
oxidized (Table IV). Glyoxylate utilization was determined by
bisulfite titration and by calorimetric analysis of the 2,4-dinitro-
280 phenylhydrazone derivative of the remaining glyoxylate. The
t enzymatic nature of the oxidation was further indicated by the
50-
EFFECT
I I
OF SPINACH
ON ENZYME
I
ACTIVITY
I I
FRACTIONS
I
I
/ /
a
200 7 1
Swiss Chard sap 6.2 5.8
fact that the rate of oxygen utilization was proportional to the Tobacco sap. 9.3 9.2 9.5
Spinach sap.. 1.4 2.8 2.9
concentration of enzyme present (Fig. 4).
Sugar beet (alcohol-precipi-
The FMN requirement of glycolic acid oxidase for glycolate tated)................... 12.9 14.6
oxidation has been reported previously (4, 5). The purified en-
May 1961 K. E. Richardson and N. E. Tolbert 1283
solute specificity of this enzyme suggest an evolutionary limit, so 9. WEINHOUSE, S., AND FRIEDMAN, B., J. Biol. Chem., 191, 707
far, in the development of an enzymatic site which-would be (1951).
10. JOKOBY, W. B., AND BHAT, J. V., Bacteriul. Rev., 22, 75 (1958).
specific for glycolate and which would not attack the glyoxylate 11. KRAKOW, G., AND BARKULUS, S. S., Biochim. et Biophys. Acta,
molecule of nearly similar structure. As a consequence, oxalate 21, 593 (1956).
production from glyoxylate occurs. 12. GALLELY, A. G., AND DAGLEY, S., Nature (London), 183, 1793
11959).
SUMMARY 13. QUAYLE, J. R., AND KEECH, D. B., Nature (London), 183, 1794
Glycolic acid oxidase from plants or animals catalyzed the (195,;.
14. CHIBA, H., KAWAI, F., AND UEDO, S., Bull. Research Inst.
oxidation of glyoxylate to oxalate, and no evidence for different Food Sci., Kyoto Univ., 16, 89 (1954). cf. Chem Abstr., 48,
enzymes for oxidizing glycolate and glyoxylate was obtained. 13753b (1954).
The oxidation of glyoxylate was inhibited by the oxalate end 15. FRIGERIO, N. A., AND HARBURG, H. A., J. Biol. Chem., 231,
product and tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane buffer. The 135 (1958).
16. STARK, J. B., GOODBAN, A. E., AND OWENS, H. S., Anal. Chem.,
affinity of the enzyme was glycolate >> L-lactate > glyoxylate.
23, 413 (1951).
In whole plants, glycolate-Cl4 was converted to oxalate-Ci4. 17. JEANES, A., WISE, G. S., AND DIMLER, R. J., Anal. Chem., 23,
415 (1951).
REFERENCES
18. BENSON, A. A., BASSHAM, J. A., CALVIN, M., GOODALE, T. C.,
1. CLAGETT, C. O., TOLBERT, N. E., AND BURRIS, R. H., J. Biol.
HAAS, V. A., AND STEPKA, W., J. Am. Chem. Sot., 72, 1710
Chem., 178, 977 (1949).
(1950).
2. KOLESNIHOV, P. A., Doklady akad. Nauk S. S. S. R., 71, 1085
(1950). 19. LEWIS, K. F., AND WEINHOUSE, S., in S. P. COLOWICK AND
TOLBERT, N. E., CLAGETT, C. O., AND BURRIS, R. H., J. Biol. N. 0. KAPLAN (Editors), Methods in enzymology, Vol. III,
3.
Chem., 181, 905 (1949). Academic Press, Inc., New York, 1957, p. 275.
KENTON, R. H., AND MANN, P. J. G., Biochem. J., 52, 130 20. FRIEDMAN, T. E., AND HAUGEN, G. E., J. Biol. Chem., 147,
4.
Alerts:
• When this article is cited
• When a correction for this article is posted