Sie sind auf Seite 1von 11

J Nanopart Res (2012) 14:757

DOI 10.1007/s11051-012-0757-0

RESEARCH PAPER

Preparation of nanoparticles of poorly water-soluble


antioxidant curcumin by antisolvent precipitation methods
Mitali Kakran • Nanda Gopal Sahoo •

I-Lin Tan • Lin Li

Received: 8 July 2011 / Accepted: 12 January 2012 / Published online: 10 February 2012
Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Abstract The objective of this study was to enhance activity, studied by the DPPH free radical-scavenging
the solubility and dissolution rate of a poorly water- assay, was greater for the curcumin nanoparticles than
soluble antioxidant, curcumin, by fabricating its the original curcumin. This study demonstrated that
nanoparticles with two methods: antisolvent precipi- both the methods can successfully prepare curcumin
tation with a syringe pump (APSP) and evaporative into submicro to nanoparticles. However, drug parti-
precipitation of nanosuspension (EPN). For APSP, cles prepared by EPN were smaller than those by
process parameters like flow rate, stirring speed, APSP and hence, showed the slightly better solubility,
solvent to antisolvent (SAS) ratio, and drug concen- dissolution rate, and antioxidant activity than the
tration were investigated to obtain the smallest particle latter.
size. For EPN, factors like drug concentration and the
SAS ratio were examined. The effects of these process Keywords Curcumin  Antisolvent precipitation
parameters on the supersaturation, nucleation, and with a syringe pump  Evaporative precipitation of
growth rate were studied and optimized to obtain the nanosuspension  Solubility  Dissolution
smallest particle size of curcumin by both the meth-
ods. The average particle size of the original drug was
about 10–12 lm and it was decreased to a mean Introduction
diameter of 330 nm for the APSP method and to
150 nm for the EPN method. Overall, decreasing the Curcumin is a hydrophobic polyphenol extracted from
drug concentration or increasing the flow rate, stirring the rhizome of the herb Curcuma longa (Anand et al.
rate, and antisolvent amount resulted in smaller 2007) and has been widely investigated for its
particle sizes. Differential scanning calorimetry stud- pharmacological activities such as anticancer (Aggar-
ies suggested lower crystallinity of curcumin particles wal et al. 2003; Sharma et al. 2005), anti-inflammatory
fabricated. The solubility and dissolution rates of the (Jurenka 2009), and antioxidant (Aftab and Vieira
prepared curcumin particles were significantly higher 2010) effects. Despite these medicinal benefits, cur-
than those the original curcumin. The antioxidant cumin has a low bioavailability due to its poor aqueous
solubility and dissolution properties (Anand et al.
2007), which greatly restricts its therapeutic use.
M. Kakran  N. G. Sahoo  I.-L. Tan  L. Li (&) Nanoparticles are suitable for delivery of such highly
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, hydrophobic agents like curcumin and can help
Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue,
overcome their poor aqueous solubility, slow dissolu-
Singapore 639798, Singapore
e-mail: mlli@ntu.edu.sg tion, and/or low bioavailability (Devalapally et al.

123
Page 2 of 11 J Nanopart Res (2012) 14:757

2007). Recently nanocolloids of curcumin for intra- of supersaturation is a prerequisite for the nucleation
venous injection have also been formed by Zheng et al. to occur. The Gibbs free energy change, DG, is the
(2010) for sustained drug release. thermodynamic parameter that indicates whether
Nanoscale can be reached by either ‘‘top down’’ or nucleation is possible or not. It is represented as the
‘‘bottom up’’ approach (Pattekari et al. 2011). In the energy barrier that a nucleation process must over-
pharmaceutical industry, the drug nanoparticles are come (Cao and Wang 2011):
mainly produced by the ‘‘top down’’ approach using
16pc3 VS3
techniques like milling and high pressure homogeni- DG ¼ ; ð2Þ
zation (Jacobs and Müller 2002; Keck and Müller 3k2 T 2 ðln SÞ2
2006). In contrast, the ‘‘bottom up’’ approach, such as where c is the surface tension, VS is the molecular
antisolvent precipitation, supercritical fluid technol- volume (molar volume/Avogadro number), k is the
ogy, spray freezing into liquid, etc., is seldom Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature, and
employed. In comparison to milling and high pressure S is the supersaturation. According to Eq. 2, a higher
homogenization, some ‘‘bottom up’’ techniques, like supersaturation (S) and a lower surface tension (c)
antisolvent precipitation are quite simple, cost effec- result in a lower critical energy barrier (DG), which
tive, and easy for scaling-up (Horn and Rieger 2001; leads to fast nucleation leading and hence, production
Rogers et al. 2004). Therefore, in this study, two types of smaller particles (Rogers et al. 2004; Matteucci
of precipitation processes namely: antisolvent precip- et al. 2006). The kinetic parameter describing how fast
itation with a syringe pump (APSP) and evaporative the nucleation occurs is given by the rate of nucleation
precipitation of nanosuspension (EPN) have been used per unit volume and per unit time, RN, as (Cao and
to prepare curcumin particles to improve its solubility Wang 2011):
and dissolution rate. The final product of the two
   
methods is the dry curcumin particles for oral drug C0 kT DG
delivery. This is the first time EPN, involving the RN ¼ exp  ; ð3Þ
3pk3 g kT
evaporation of the solvents, has been used to prepare
the curcumin nanoparticles. Besides that the compar- where k is the diameter of the growth species and g is
ison has been made with the APSP method, which the viscosity of the solution. This equation indicates
focuses on filtration to obtain the curcumin particles. that high initial concentration (C0) or a higher
Various process parameters have been studied and supersaturation (i.e., a large number of nucleation
optimized to produce the smallest particle sizes by sites), low viscosity (g), and low critical energy barrier
both the methods and comparison has been made in (DG) favor the formation of a large number of nuclei.
terms of the size and quality of the products obtained For a given concentration of solute, a larger number of
by the two methods. nuclei mean smaller nuclei.
A precipitation process consists of (i) generation of Figure 1 schematically illustrates the processes of
supersaturation, (ii) nucleation, and (iii) subsequent supersaturation, nucleation, and subsequent growth by
growth of nuclei. For antisolvent precipitation of coagulation and condensation. When the concentra-
poorly water-soluble drug, the drug is first dissolved in tion of solute increases as a function of time, no
a solvent, which is rapidly mixed with a solvent- nucleation would occur even above the equilibrium
miscible antisolvent (e.g., water). The solubility of a solubility. The nucleation occurs only when the
drug in the solvent–antisolvent mixture is lowered supersaturation reaches a certain value above the
compared to that in the original solvent and in this solubility, which corresponds to the energy barrier
way, a driving force for precipitation, called super- defined by Eq. 2 for the formation of nuclei. After the
saturation (S), is created, which is defined as: initial nucleation, the concentration or supersaturation
of the growth species decreases. When the concentra-
C0
S¼ ; ð1Þ tion decreases below this critical concentration, which
C corresponds to the critical energy, no more nuclei
where C0 is the initial concentration of a drug in the would form. The growth will continue until the
solution to be precipitated and C* is the solubility of concentration of growth species reaches the equilib-
the drug in the solvent–antisolvent system. Generation rium concentration or solubility.

123
J Nanopart Res (2012) 14:757 Page 3 of 11

drying of the nanoparticles to completely evaporate all


the solvents. The drug concentrations used were 5, 10,
15 mg/mL and the solvent to antisolvent (SAS) ratios
were varied from 1:10, 1:15 to 1:20 (v/v). For 20 mL
of the drug solution, 200–400 mL hexane was used.

Characterization

For calculating the S in Eq. 1, the solubility (C*) of


curcumin in the solvent–antisolvent system was
measured by adding an excess amount of the original
curcumin into ethanol antisolvent (water and hexane)
mixture at various ratios (1:10, 1:15, 1:20 by volume).
Fig. 1 Schematic illustration of supersaturation, nucleation,
The mixture was shaken continuously at room
and subsequent growth (Kakran et al. 2010) temperature (25 °C) for 24 h and then filtered through
a 0.2-lm polypropylene-reinforced PTFE membrane
and analyzed spectrometrically at 422 nm using UV
Experimental spectrometer (UV-3101PC, Shimadzu).
The morphology and size of samples were observed
Materials using a scanning electron microscope (JSM-6390LA-
SEM, Jeol Co., Japan). The particle sizes were
Curcumin was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Sin- analyzed by the UTHSCSA ImageTool program.
gapore. All the reagents used were of technical grade. Differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) measure-
N-Hexane (HPLC grade) and ethanol (99.5–99.8%, ments were carried out using a TA DSC 200 thermal
Absolute, GR Grade for analysis) were obtained from analyzer in a temperature range of 50–250 °C at a
Merck, Singapore. The deionized water (Milli-Q, heating rate of 10 °C/min in nitrogen gas. The melting
Millipore, Singapore) was used in experiments. point and heat of fusion were calculated using the TA
DSC software.
Methods For the solubility study, an excess amount of the
original curcumin and its nanoparticles prepared by
For the APSP method, the solutions of original APSP and EPN were added into 20 mL of deionized
curcumin were prepared in ethanol at the predeter- water. The mixture was shaken continuously at room
mined concentrations of 5–15 mg/mL. The syringe temperature (25 ± 0. 5 °C) for 24 h at 100 rpm. At
was filled with 20 mL of the prepared solution and the end of 24 h, samples were filtered through a 0.2-
secured onto a syringe pump. The drug solution was lm polypropylene-reinforced PTFE membrane (Mini-
quickly injected at a fixed flow rate (2–10 mL/min) start-SRP15, Sartorius, Germany) and diluted imme-
into the deionized water (antisolvent) of a definite diately with deionized water. The concentration of
volume under magnetic stirring (200–1,000 rpm). drug was determined spectrometrically at 422 nm
Different ratios of ethanol to water used were using a UV spectrometer.
1:10–1:20 (v/v) corresponding to a volume of The in-vitro dissolution of the samples was deter-
200–400 mL of water for 20 mL of drug solution. mined using the paddle method (USP apparatus II,
The curcumin nanoparticles formed were filtered and Vankel VK 7000 Dissolution Tester) in 900 mL of DI
vacuum dried. For the EPN method, the solution of water. The paddle rotation was set at 100 rpm. The
original curcumin was prepared in ethanol and then a temperature was maintained at 25 ± 0.5 °C. The
nanosuspension was formed by quickly adding hexane samples containing an equivalent 5 mg of curcumin
(antisolvent). Drug particles in the nanosuspension were tested for their dissolution. 1 mL of the dissolved
were obtained by quick evaporation of the solvent and solution samples was collected at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1,
antisolvent, under vacuum using a rotary evaporator 1.5, 2, 3, and 4 h of dissolution time. The dissolution
(Kakran et al. 2010). This was followed by vacuum test for each sample was performed in triplicate and

123
Page 4 of 11 J Nanopart Res (2012) 14:757

the dissolution data was averaged. The concentration antisolvent. As discussed above, the supersaturation is
of drug was determined spectrometrically at 422 nm the prerequisite for nucleation; therefore, the values of
using a UV spectrometer. supersaturation (S) are calculated using Eq. 1 and are
The antioxidant activity was measured by the listed in Table 1. As discussed earlier, a higher value of
DPPH assay. DPPH (200 lM in methanol) was S leads to an increased nucleation rate and a decreased
incubated (in darkness) with 2.0 mL of aqueous critical nuclear size. However, it can be seen from
solution of original curcumin and its nanoparticles at Table 1 that S is not the only parameter that governs the
room temperature. After 30 min of incubation at room kinetics of nucleation. Besides the supersaturation that
temperature, the absorbance was measured at 518 nm determines the nucleation, the crystal growth rate is also
using a UV spectrometer (Mensor et al. 2001). The a factor that affects the ultimate particle size. Therefore,
percentage inhibition of the samples was calculated in this study, various critical process parameters such as
using the formula: stirring speed, flow rate, SAS ratio, drug concentration
in solvent, and temperature of the antisolvent have been
%of inhibition ¼ ½ðcontrol OD  test ODÞ=control OD
examined and discussed below.
 100;
ð4Þ
Stirring speed
where OD is the optical density.
It is observed from Table 1 that with increasing the
stirring speed from 200 to 1,000 rpm, both the diameter
Results and discussion and length of curcumin particles decreased consider-
ably from 550 and 3,800 nm (APSP 1) to 500 and
Antisolvent precipitation with a syringe pump 2,560 nm (APSP 3), respectively. This decrease in
particle size was due to the intensification of micro-
Antisolvent precipitation is a simple and quite effective mixing between the multiphases with increasing
approach to produce nanoparticles of poorly water- stirring speed. The more intense stirring at 1,000 rpm
soluble drugs by mixing a drug solution and an with high efficiency of micromixing reduced the mass

Table 1 The preparation parameters such as stirring speed properties like the particle size (diameter and length), melting
(rpm), flow rate (mL/min), SAS ratio, drug concentration (DC, temperature (Tm, °C), enthalpy of fusion (DHf, J/g) and
mg/mL); Reynolds number (Re); solubility (C*) of curcumin in solubility (lg/mL) at 25 °C for the curcumin samples prepared
the ethanol–water system (corresponding to the SAS ratio) and by the APSP method
the resulting supersaturation (S) calculated using Eq. 1; and
Samples Process parameters Re C* S Particle size (nm) Tm DHf Solubility
(lg/mL) (°C) (J/g) (lg/mL)
Stirring Flow rate SAS DC Diameter Length
speed (mL/min) (mg/mL)
(rpm)

APSP 1 200 2 1:10 5 145 0.0216 231 550 ± 70 3,800 ± 332 174.0 127.8 2.62
APSP 2 500 2 1:10 5 145 0.0216 231 520 ± 62 3,120 ± 219 173.3 106.4 2.91
APSP 3 1,000 2 1:10 5 145 0.0216 231 500 ± 65 2,560 ± 220 173.2 73.0 3.83
APSP 4 1,000 5 1:10 5 360 0.0216 231 495 ± 50 2,010 ± 166 173.4 96.7 4.34
APSP 5 1,000 10 1:10 5 720 0.0216 231 490 ± 51 1,860 ± 143 173.1 82.1 4.90
APSP 6 1,000 10 1:15 5 720 0.0072 694 420 ± 48 1,340 ± 110 173.5 56.4 5.69
APSP 7 1,000 10 1:20 5 720 0.0021 2380 340 ± 37 930 ± 88 173.5 68.1 6.13
APSP 8 1,000 10 1:20 10 720 0.0021 4761 345 ± 40 950 ± 90 173.2 88.5 6.05
APSP 9 1,000 10 1:20 15 720 0.0021 7142 360 ± 42 965 ± 96 173.1 65.9 6.22
a
APSP 10 1,000 10 1:20 5 720 0.0004 12,500 330 ± 36 860 ± 99 173.7 48.6 7.48
(at 5 °C)
a
Measured at 5 °C, all others at room temperature (25 °C)

123
J Nanopart Res (2012) 14:757 Page 5 of 11

transfer resistance, thereby enhancing the mass trans- 10-8 m3/s), and the corresponding values of Re
fer and the rate of mixing between the multiphases. As increased from 145 to 360 then to 720 (shown in
a result, a homogenous mixing could be achieved in Table 1). The decrease in particle size is greater when
short time, thus, producing smaller drug particles. Re increased from 145 to 360 than in the case of
Therefore, all further experiments were performed 360–720. Previously, Dalvi and Dave (2009) also
with a stirring speed of 1,000 rpm to maintain the reported for their antisolvent precipitation system that
consistent mixing conditions. controlling the flow rate to increase the Re beyond 900
resulted in a marginal change in particle size.
Flow rate In light of these experiments, all further experiments
were conducted at the stirring speed of 1,000 rpm and
At a lower flow rate, the efficiency of solvent/anti- the flow rate of 10 mL/min. As seen from Table 1, the
solvent mixing is lower and hence, there are few values of S were affected by the ratio of the SAS, the
nucleating sites, which give rise to a prolonged crystal drug concentration in the solution, and the temperature.
growth process and the formation of larger crystals. It From the calculations, a larger SAS ratio, a higher drug
was observed in our study that as the flow rate of the concentration and a lower temperature resulted in
curcumin solution into the deionized water was greater S, which principally should lead to more nuclei
increased from 2 to 10 mL/min, the length of curcu- with smaller sizes. Following is the discussion about
min particles decreased significantly from 2,560 nm these factors.
(APSP 3) to 1,860 nm (APSP 5). This is because the
curcumin solution was mixed more rapidly into SAS ratio
deionized water as the flow rate was increased. As
the time was short for allowing the crystal growth, The average particle sizes in Table 1 and the corre-
only smaller crystals were formed. However, it can be sponding SEM images in Fig. 2 suggest an inversely
seen that there was no significant decrease in the proportional relationship between the amount of
particle diameter when increasing the flow rate in our antisolvent in the SAS ratio and the particle size.
study. This can be explained based on the fact that the Both the length and the diameter of the curcumin
crystal growth in curcumin occurs along one direction particles decreased drastically from 1,860 and 490 nm
leading to needle-shaped curcumin crystals as (APSP 5) to 930 and 340 nm (APSP 7), respectively,
reported earlier by He et al. (2010). Therefore, in our as the SAS ratio was changed from 1:10 to 1:20. There
study, increasing the flow rate restricted the growth of are a few reasons for this observation. When the
curcumin particles in one direction only. curcumin solution was added to the deionized water,
Increasing the flow rate increased the jet velocity, the curcumin concentration was reduced more quickly
the Reynolds number (Re, Table 1) and shear forces, as the amount of antisolvent was increased, which led
resulting in an increased extent of mixing between the to faster precipitation of the drug into nanoparticles.
drug solution and the antisolvent per unit time. The From Table 1, the S values at the greater antisolvent
corresponding Reynolds number Re was calculated amount were higher and according to Eqs. 2, 3 a
according to the following equation: greater amount of antisolvent should lead to a greater
nucleation rate and hence smaller nuclei. Once the
VD QD
Re ¼ ¼ ð5Þ nuclei are formed, growth occurs simultaneously. For
v Av the subsequent growth, more antisolvent amount
where V is the flow velocity for the solvent (m/s), D is increases the diffusion distance for growing species
the diameter of the pipe (m), v is the kinematic viscosity and consequently diffusion becomes the limiting step
(m2/s), Q is the volumetric flow rate (m3/s), and A is the for nuclei growth (Cao and Wang 2011).
pipe cross-sectional area (m2). The diameter of the
injection needle, 0.24 mm, and the kinematic viscosity Drug concentration
of ethanol, 1.23 9 10-6 m2/s, were used to calculate the
value of Re. The volumetric flow rate, Q, was varied The drug concentration affects the size of precipitated
from 2 mL/min (3.33 9 10-8 m3/s) to 5 mL/min particles in opposing ways: a higher drug concentra-
(8.33 9 10-8 m3/s), then to 10 mL/min (16.66 9 tion leads to a greater supersaturation (S) as seen from

123
Page 6 of 11 J Nanopart Res (2012) 14:757

Fig. 2 SEM photographs of original curcumin and curcumin particles prepared by APSP and EPN: a original curcumin, b APSP 3,
c APSP 5, d APSP 7, e APSP 10, f EPN 2, g EPN 3, and h EPN 5. The sample codes are described in Table 1

Table 1, which results in a faster nucleation rate and (Matteucci et al. 2006). As shown in Table 1,
thereby smaller particles. However, high supersatura- increasing the drug concentration from 5 to 10 and
tion also speeds up agglomeration through the greater 15 mg/mL resulted in an increase in particle length
chance of particle collision to produce bigger particles from 930 nm (APSP 7) to 950 nm (APSP 8) and

123
J Nanopart Res (2012) 14:757 Page 7 of 11

965 nm (APSP 9), respectively, and a corresponding frequency and resulted in a decrease in particle growth
minor increase in the particle diameter as well, which by preventing coagulation and agglomeration. There-
indicated that in our study agglomeration prevailed fore, the smaller particles were formed as a result of
over nucleation at high drug concentrations. This the high nucleation rate and low growth rate at the low
result was governed by two factors: the number of temperature, 5 °C. The particle diameter and length of
nuclei formed in the solvent/antisolvent interface, and sample APSP10 were 330 and 860 nm, respectively.
the influence of concentration on the viscosity (Gal-
indo-Rodriguez et al. 2004). On one hand, at a higher Evaporative precipitation of nanosuspension
concentration, a large number of nuclei were formed at
the interface of two phases which lead to agglomer- In this process, the antisolvent was changed from
ation and thus, formation of larger particles. Simulta- water to hexane to precipitate curcumin particles from
neously, those nuclei obstructed the further diffusion its solution in ethanol. From Tables 1 and 3, with
of drug molecules from the SAS. On the other hand, hexane as antisolvent the S values were lower than that
the viscosity of the drug solution increased with with water. This was due to the higher solubility (C*)
increasing concentration, which hindered the diffusion of curcumin in the ethanol–hexane mixture than the
between solution and antisolvent, resulting in non- ethanol–water mixture. According to Eqs. 2, 3, the
uniform supersaturation (Zhang et al. 2009) and then lower surface tension and lower viscosity increase
the larger drug particles. the rate of nucleation, thereby leading to formation of
In this study, a higher antisolvent amount compared a large number of smaller sized nuclei. It should be
to solvent (SAS ratio) and a lower drug concentration noted that, although a lower viscosity is desired for a
resulted in smaller particle size for curcumin and higher rate of nucleation to facilitate diffusion of drug
APSP 7. Therefore, the hint to produce smaller from SAS, a higher viscosity would lead to lesser
particles is to start with unsaturated initial solutions crystal growth. Table 2 shows the comparison of some
(i.e., low drug concentrations), and then create a high of the physical properties of water and hexane.
supersaturation by using a greater amount of Comparing water and hexane, in spite of exhibiting
antisolvent. lower S values, hexane possesses a lower surface
tension and viscosity which facilitate faster nucle-
Temperature ation. In the case of using hexane as antisolvent,
because of the lower supersaturation (S) generated, the
The effect of temperature on the size of curcumin chance of particle collision was reduced during the
particles was studied. In this experiment, the deionized precipitation process and it resulted in a uniform
cold water was used as antisolvent and kept in an ice nanosuspension independent of the agitation speed
bath to maintain the antisolvent at a temperature of and also the flow rate. Filtering such a nanosuspension
about 5 °C. The precipitation process is expected to be did not yield any particles as they were too small.
influenced by the temperature through several ways. Therefore, the EPN process was devised to extract the
First, reduction in the antisolvent temperature curcumin particles from the nanosuspension. The
decreases the equilibrium solubility of curcumin in lower boiling point and heat of vaporization of hexane
the solute–solvent–antisolvent mixture and hence, (Table 2) make it possible to quickly evaporate the
increases the supersaturation. As shown in Table 1, a curcumin–ethanol–hexane nanosuspension using a
change in the antisolvent temperature from 25 to 5 °C
enhanced the value of S from 2,380 to 12,500, so that
Table 2 Physical properties of water and hexane
the nucleation rate increased and hence the particle
size decreased. Second, the precipitation in the liquid Properties Water Hexane
phase is a diffusion-limited process (Nielsen 1964). At
Surface tension at 20 °C 72.86 18.4
a lower temperature the diffusion rate is lower and (dyne/cm or mN/m)
accordingly the crystal growth rate is lower. The Viscosity (cP) at 25 °C 0.894 0.294
decrease in the antisolvent temperature from 25 to Boiling point (°C) 100 69
5 °C increased the viscosity of water from 0.894 to Heat of vaporization (kJ/kg) 2,444 366
1.519 cP, which led to a reduction in particle collision

123
Page 8 of 11 J Nanopart Res (2012) 14:757

rotary evaporator to obtain the curcumin particles. Comparing both the methods, EPN gave particles
Water was not used for this method because of its with much smaller diameters than those produced by
higher boiling point and greater heat of vaporization APSP. The morphologies of the curcumin particles
(Table 2). We have shown in our other study that obtained from both the methods were different from
using water as antisolvent for EPN resulted in big the original curcumin as observed from Fig. 2. The
and non-uniform drug particles (Kakran et al. 2011). external shape, imparted to a crystal by the develop-
Table 3 lists the curcumin samples prepared by the ment of its various forms, is referred to as crystal habit,
EPN method. The similar trends regarding the SAS which is not exclusively controlled by the internal
ratio and drug concentration were observed for EPN structure of a crystal, but also by the environmental
as in case of the APSP method. The length and conditions during nucleation and growth (Park et al.
diameter of the curcumin particles decreased from 2006). In our study, the crystal habit of curcumin
1,680 and 300 nm (EPN 1) to 850 and 150 nm changed from spherical or irregular shape of the
(EPN 3) as the SAS ratio was changed from 1:10 to original curcumin to lath-like by the APSP method and
1:20 due to the increase in the value of S. On the needle-like by the EPN method. This difference in
other hand, increasing the drug concentration from 5 particle shape should be attributed to the use of
to 15 mg/mL slightly increased the particle length different antisolvents in both the methods. The use of
and diameter from 850 and 150 nm (EPN 3) to 920 the organic antisolvent (hexane) favoured the needle-
and 155 nm (EPN 5), respectively, indicating that like morphology, while the polar antisolvent (water)
agglomeration dominated over nucleation at high resulted in the lath-like particles. For the curcumin
drug concentrations as discussed earlier for the particles prepared by APSP, the length of the particles
APSP method. deceased as the mixing and the nucleation rate
As seen from Fig. 2, the original curcumin powder increased as can be seen from Fig. 2b, d. But for
exhibited particles around 10–12 lm, whereas the EPN, the shapes of particles were needle like for all the
curcumin particles prepared by APSP and EPN were samples.
much smaller in size. For the curcumin particles
prepared by APSP, the APSP 10 exhibited the smallest DSC analysis
particle diameter and length of 330 and 860 nm,
respectively, at the stirring speed of 1,000 rpm, flow To understand the effect of the two methods, APSP and
rate of 10 mL/min, SAS volume ratio of 1:20, and EPN, on the melting temperature and the melting
5 mg/mL of drug concentration. For the curcumin enthalpy of curcumin, DSC was conducted. DSC
particles prepared by EPN, the EPN 3 exhibited the thermograms of the original curcumin and its particles
smallest diameter and length of 150 and 850 nm, prepared by APSP and EPN are shown in Fig. 3. The
respectively, at the SAS volume ratio: 1:20 and drug melting temperature (Tm) and heat of fusion (DHf)
concentration of 5 mg/mL. obtained are summarized in Tables 1 and 3. The original

Table 3 The preparation parameters like drug concentration using Eq. 1; and properties like the particle size (diameter and
(DC, mg/mL) and SAS ratio; the solubility (C*) of curcumin in length), melting temperature (Tm), enthalpy of fusion (DHf) and
the curcumin–ethanol–hexane system (corresponding to the solubility at 25 °C for the original curcumin and the curcumin
SAS ratio) and the resulting supersaturation (S) calculated samples prepared by the EPN method
Samples Process parameters C* (lg/mL) S Particle size (nm) Tm (°C) DHf (J/g) Solubility
(lg/mL)
SAS DC (mg/mL) Diameter Length

Original – – 12,370 173.8 159.7 0.58


EPN 1 1:10 5 0.7469 6.69 300 ± 34 1,680 ± 90 173.3 112.0 6.11
EPN 2 1:15 5 0.0935 53.47 200 ± 25 1,310 ± 71 172.8 110.3 7.24
EPN 3 1:20 5 0.0134 371.471 150 ± 15 850 ± 36 173.0 68.9 8.23
EPN 4 1:20 10 0.0134 742.94 150 ± 18 905 ± 30 173.1 82.1 8.02
EPN 5 1:20 15 0.0134 1114.41 155 ± 21 920 ± 28 173.9 56.5 8.31

123
J Nanopart Res (2012) 14:757 Page 9 of 11

curcumin used in this study had a sharp melting the particles. Comparing the samples prepared by both
endothermic peak at 173.8 °C and a melting enthalpy APSP and EPN, it was noted that the crystallinity did not
of 159.7 J/g. From Table 1, it can be seen that the APSP- depend on the particle size but rather on the method of
prepared curcumin particles had melting point preparation. There was no significant difference in the
*173 °C, very similar to the original curcumin, but enthalpy of fusion and hence the crystallinity of the
the enthalpy of fusion was lower than that of the original samples by both the methods, in spite of the difference in
curcumin. The enthalpy of fusion is proportional to the particle size. Thus, it is observed that APSP produces
degree of crystallinity in the samples. These results less crystalline particles compared to EPN.
suggested that the crystallinity of curcumin was
decreased after it was prepared by the APSP process. Solubility study
Table 3 shows that the melting temperatures for the
EPN-prepared samples were also *173 °C and the The solubility values at 25 °C measured for the original
enthalpy of fusion was lower than that of the original curcumin and its particles fabricated by APSP and EPN
curcumin, indicating a certain loss of crystallinity of are listed in Tables 1 and 3. The solubility of the original
curcumin during the EPN process as well. Therefore, it curcumin was extremely low being only 0.58 ± 0.03
is seen that decreasing the particle size of the original lg/mL, and it increased by 14 times to the highest value
curcumin from micro- to nanoscale by APSP and EPN of 8.23 ± 0.07 lg/mL for the EPN 3. Among the
methods resulted in a reduction in the crystallinity of APSP-prepared samples, APSP 10 exhibited the max-
imum solubility of 7.48 ± 0.11 lg/mL. The increase in
solubility was because the particles prepared by APSP
and EPN were much smaller as compared to the original
curcumin. It is known that the solubility increases with
decreasing particle size below 1,000 nm (Keck and
Müller 2006). Besides that, an increase in the solubility
and also the dissolution velocity can also be achieved by
changing the crystalline state of a crystalline drug. An
amorphous or metastable form of a drug has a greater
solubility as compared to its crystalline form (Hancock
and Zografi 1997). Therefore, the curcumin nanoparti-
cles exhibited the enhanced solubility because of the
smaller particle size and the lower crystallinity as
compared to the original curcumin. The curcumin
particles prepared by EPN showed the higher solubility
than the ones prepared by APSP because of their
comparatively smaller particle sizes.

Dissolution study

The dissolution tests were performed for the original


curcumin and the selected samples (EPN 3 and 5, APSP
9 and 10) because they all showed the relatively higher
solubility among the samples prepared by EPN and
APSP. As seen in Fig. 4 for the dissolution profiles of
the samples, only about 10% of the original curcumin
dissolved within 4 h as compared to 93–96% of
dissolution for the EPN-prepared curcumin and 75–
81% of dissolution for the APSP-prepared samples.
Fig. 3 DSC thermograms for original curcumin and particles According to Noyes–Whitney equation (1897), the
prepared by a EPN and b APSP dissolution velocity, dc/dt, is expressed as:

123
Page 10 of 11 J Nanopart Res (2012) 14:757

Fig. 5 Antioxidant activities for original curcumin and nano-


Fig. 4 Dissolution profiles for original curcumin and particles particles prepared by EPN and APSP
prepared by APSP and EPN

dc c  c 
s x
¼AD ; ð6Þ of DPPH provides an easy and rapid way to evaluate
dt h antioxidant properties of curcumin. Curcumin shows
where A is the surface area, D is the diffusion an antioxidative effect which is mainly due to its
coefficient, cs is the saturation solubility, cx is the phenolic hydroxyl groups. The free radical-scaveng-
bulk concentration, and h is the diffusional distance. ing properties of the original curcumin and curcumin
Reducing the particle size to nanoscale can increase nanoparticles prepared by EPN and APSP are shown
the dissolution velocity or the dissolution rate of a in Fig. 5. The observed scavenging effect of curcumin
poorly water-soluble drug by increasing the surface on the DPPH radicals decreased in the following
area (A), the diffusion coefficient (D), and difference order: EPN-prepared curcumin nanoparticles C
between the saturation solubility and bulk concentra- APSP-prepared curcumin nanoparticles  original
tion (cs - cx); or by decreasing the diffusional curcumin. From the solubility and dissolution studies,
distance (h) (Müller et al. 2000). In our study, the it was observed that the curcumin nanoparticles
mean particle size of original curcumin was reduced to showed the much higher solubility and dissolution
a nanometer range by the EPN and APSP methods. rate in water than the original curcumin, thus showing
In addition to that an amorphous or metastable form a higher free radical-scavenging effect. The previous
could dissolve at a faster rate because of its higher studies have also suggested that the nanoparticles of
internal energy and greater molecular mobility, as curcumin (Yen et al. 2010) have an improved antiox-
compared to crystalline materials (Hancock and idant activity in vitro.
Zografi 1997). The DSC study revealed that the
crystallinity of EPN and APSP-prepared curcumin
nanoparticles was lower than that of the original Conclusions
curcumin. Therefore, reduction in both particle size
and crystallinity led to a faster rate of dissolution for This study demonstrated that both APSP and EPN
the curcumin nanoparticles prepared. The higher methods can successfully prepare curcumin nanopar-
dissolution rate could translate into increased bio- ticles. The curcumin nanoparticles prepared by the two
availability upon oral administration. methods exhibited the lower crystallinity as revealed
by the DSC analysis. The EPN process produced
DPPH free radical-scavenging assay smaller particles, and gave the slightly higher solubil-
ity and dissolution rate than those produced by the
DPPH is a free radical and stable at room temperature, APSP method. The dissolution rate of curcumin was
which produces a deep violet solution in organic improved tremendously after it was prepared into
solvents. It is reduced in the presence of curcumin nanoparticles because of the decrease in both the
molecules, giving rise to uncolored solutions. The use particle size and crystallinity. The APSP has the

123
J Nanopart Res (2012) 14:757 Page 11 of 11

advantages of using water as antisolvent and being a Jacobs C, Müller RH (2002) Production and characterization of
simple pumping, stirring and filtering system, whereas a budesonide nanosuspensions for pulmonary administra-
tion. Pharm Res 19:189–194
the EPN uses hexane as antisolvent and is a vacuum Jurenka JS (2009) Anti-inflammatory properties of curcumin, a
evaporation process to prepare nanoparticles. major constituent of Curcuma longa: a review of preclin-
Although the EPN method could produce smaller ical and clinical research. Altern Med Rev 14:141–153
particles than the APSP, the solubility and dissolution Kakran M, Sahoo NG, Li L, Judeh Z, Wang Y, Chong K, Loh L
(2010) Fabrication of drug nanoparticles by evaporative
rates were not significantly different between the drug precipitation of nanosuspension. Int J Pharm 383:285–292
particles prepared by the two methods. To conclude, Kakran M, Sahoo NG, Li L (2011) Dissolution enhancement of
both the methods represent an efficient means to quercetin through nanofabrication, complexation, and solid
obtain curcumin nanoparticles with a higher solubility dispersion. Colloids Surf B 88:121–130
Keck CM, Müller RH (2006) Drug nanocrystals of poorly sol-
and a higher rate of dissolution in vitro. These uble drugs produced by high pressure homogenization. Eur
nanoparticles are expected to exhibit a higher bio- J Pharm Biopharm 62:3–16
availability in vivo, which will lead to considerable Matteucci ME, Hotze MA, Johnston KP, Williams RO 3rd
dose reduction for the patients. (2006) Drug nanoparticles by antisolvent precipitation:
mixing energy versus surfactant stabilization. Langmuir
22:8951–8959
Acknowledgments Authors acknowledge Lee Kuan Yew Mensor LL, Menezes FS, Leitão GG, Reis AS, Santos TC,
Postdoctoral Fellowship and SUG grant M58050023, NTU, Coube CS, Leitão SG (2001) Screening of Brazilian plant
Singapore. extracts for antioxidant activity by the use of DPPH free
radical method. Phytother Res 15:127–130
Müller RH, Jacobs C, Kayser O (2000) Nanosuspensions for the
References formulation of poorly soluble drugs. In: Nielloud F, Marti-
Mestres G (eds) Pharmaceutical emulsions and suspen-
sions. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 383–407
Aftab N, Vieira A (2010) Antioxidant activities of curcumin and
Nielsen AE (1964) Kinetics of precipitation. Pergamon Press,
combinations of this curcuminoid with other phytochemi-
Oxford
cals. Phytother Res 24:500–502
Noyes AA, Whitney WR (1897) The rate of solution of solid
Aggarwal BB, Kumar A, Bharti AC (2003) Anticancer potential
substances in their own solutions. J Am Chem Soc 19:
of curcumin: preclinical and clinical studies. Anticancer
930–934
Res 23:363–398
Park S-J, Jeon S-Y, Yeo S-D (2006) Recrystallization of a
Anand P, Kunnumakkara AB, Newman RA, Aggarwal BB
pharmaceutical compound using liquid and supercritical
(2007) Bioavailability of curcumin: problems and prom-
antisolvents. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:2287–2293
ises. Mol Pharm 4:807–818
Pattekari P, Zheng Z, Zhang X, Levchenko T, Torchilin V, Lvov
Cao G, Wang Y (2011) Nanostructures and nanomaterials—
Y (2011) Top-down and bottom-up approaches in pro-
synthesis, properties and applications, 2nd edn. World
duction aqueous nanocolloids of paclitaxel. Phys Chem
Scientific, London
Chem Phys 13:9014–9019
Dalvi SV, Dave RN (2009) Controlling particle size of a poorly
Rogers TL, Gillespie IB, Hitt JE, Fransen KL, Crowl CA,
water-soluble drug using ultrasound and stabilizers in an-
Tucker CJ, Kupperblatt GB, Becker GN, Wilson DL, Todd
tisolvent precipitation. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:7581–7593
C, Broomall CF, Evans JC, Elder EJ (2004) Development
Devalapally H, Chakilam A, Amiji MM (2007) Role of nano-
and characterization of a scalable controlled precipitation
technology in pharmaceutical product development.
process to enhance the dissolution of poorly water-soluble
J Pharm Sci 96:2547–2565
drugs. Pharm Res 21:2048–2057
Galindo-Rodriguez S, Allémann SE, Fessi H, Doelker E (2004)
Sharma RA, Gescher AJ, Steward WP (2005) Curcumin: the
Physicochemical parameters associated with nanopar-
story so far. Eur J Cancer 41:1955–1968
ticle formation in the salting salting-out, emulsification–
Yen FL, Wu TH, Tzeng CW, Lin LT, Lin CC (2010) Curcumin
diffusion, and nanoprecipitation methods. Pharm Res
nanoparticles improve the physicochemical properties of
21:1428–1439
curcumin and effectively enhance its antioxidant and an-
Hancock BC, Zografi G (1997) Characteristics and significance
tihepatoma activities. J Agric Food Chem 58:7376–7382
of the amorphous state in pharmaceutical systems. J Pharm
Zhang HX, Wang JX, Zhang ZB, Le Y, Shen ZG, Chen JF
Sci 86:1–12
(2009) Micronization of atorvastatin calcium by antisol-
He Y, Huang Y, Cheng Y (2010) Structure evolution of curcu-
vent precipitation process. Int J Pharm 374:106–113
min nanoprecipitation from a micromixer. Cryst Growth
Zheng Z, Zhang X, Carbo D, Clark C, Nathan C-A, Lvov Y
Des 10:1021–1024
(2010) Sonication assisted synthesis of polyelectrolyte
Horn D, Rieger J (2001) Organic nanoparticles in the aqueous
coated curcumin nanoparticles. Langmuir 26:7679–7681
phase—theory, experiment, and use. Angew Chem Int Ed
Engl 40:4330–4361

123

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen