Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Rachawit Photiyarach
This research examines the personal perspectives of expats identified as farang who lived
between August 2014 and April 2015 in Thailand. This study is based on a qualitative
approach, using semi-structured interviews with twenty-six interviewees in the Bangkok
Metropolitan Area. The problem concerns the degree of interculturalism and integration in
Thailand from perceptions of expats identified as farang.
The results of this extensive qualitative survey are interpreted on four main areas: Social
acceptance, Thai law for foreigners, the image of farang, and integration and interculturalism
in Thailand. Here are the results that the researcher discovered from this study: 1: the reasons
for, 2: the barriers to and 3: the advice for interculturalism and integration in Thailand from
the perspectives of people identified as farang who live in Thailand.
With an increasing number expats from around the world, among them many farang,
Thailand has become one of the most popular expat hubs in Southeast Asia. However, many
farang still feel that they are not accepted as a part of Thai society, even though they speak
Thai fluently and have fair knowledge of Thai culture.
Thailand has used an assimilation method to force many ethnic groups to become Thai, but
what about farang? Farang might have a harder time than Asian ethnic groups to be counted
as a part of Thai society, due to the fact that they are stereotyped by many Thais as non-Thai
or foreigners. The general belief that farang are automatically an outsider is rooted in many
Thai people’s mind. When they make a comparison between Thainess and un-Thainess,
farang will usually be classified as a non-member of Thai society.
According to the respondents, the dual price system is widely applied by many tuk tuk and
taxi drivers because they see farang or white people as a main target to rip-off because they
stereotype that all whites or farang are wealthy. In addition, the concept of Thainess (Kwam
phen Thai) is a big stumbling block to exclude farang culture, identity, and race from the
mainstream society.
A visible example of policies that make many expats to feel unwelcomed from Thai society is
the 90 day report, short-term visa status and strict residency rule. Even thought, many farang
have a Thai spouse, but they still have a difficult time gaining residency or obtaining a work
permit. The concept of farang itself also is problematic because it is used to lump all white
people together, but the fact is that there are distinct nationalities, occupations, social roles,
cultures, ethnicities, and languages among these farang people.
The emerging of globalization plays a crucial role in connecting people from different race,
ethnicity, culture, and nationality together. Thailand is also a country in the world that has to
cope with race relations, ethnic conflicts, cultural clash, and identity crisis. This is because
we cannot stop the upcoming period of acculturation, transnationalism, cultural relativism,
third culture, and intercultural dialog.
Thirdly, mutual trust and understanding between Thais and expats is necessary for
social integration. The mutual adjustment and respect here should be from both sides. In other
words, everyone attempts to adapt to everyone else (Bennett 2004, 71). For example, Thai
people need to feel empathy to expats identified as farang and view racial stereotypes,
ethnocentrism and prejudices as negative in order to understand the society with a broader
attitude. Additionally, expats have to be open-minded to Thai people, culture and society.
Ethnocentrism might not be as common in Thai society as the respondents think. There are
ethnorelative Thais who are interested in helping expats integrate into Thai society. Mutual
understanding and respect in an intercultural dialog may lead to more successful intercultural
relations between Thais and farang expats.