Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
High level stress affects the individual directly and through them, their families
and organizations are also affected. Therefore, efforts should be made to overcome the
negative consequences of high stress. Stress management is required when an individual
is unable to cope with the demanding environment. This inability generates anxiety and
produces defensive behavior and stress symptoms. Therefore, certain actions are required
for
developing adaptive behavior so as to overcome the consequences of stress. Such actions
may be taken at individual level as well as at organizational level.
Stress may cause within organizational context and outside. Therefore, coping
strategies may be adopted by individuals without reference to the organization.
Individual coping strategies tend to be more reactive in nature. That is, they tend to have
ways of coping with stress that has already occurred. Some individual strategies, such as
physical exercise, can be both reactive and proactive, but most are geared towards
helping the person who is already suffering from stress. Following are the major
individual coping strategies:
Physical exercise
Physical exercise is a good strategy to get body fit and to overcome stress.
Physical exercises of different types such as, walking, jogging, swimming; playing, etc.
are good methods of overcoming stress. The role of Yoga, a scientific technique of
physical exercise to keep body fit and to overcome stress.
Relaxation
Impact of stress can be overcome by relaxation. The relaxation can be simple one
or some specific techniques of relaxation such as biofeedback and meditation.
Work-home transition
Work-home transition is also like a relaxation technique. For instance, during the
last5 hour of work, the person can review the day’s activities; list the priorities of the
activities that need to be attended to the next day. Thus, he can finish his day’s work and
come back in relaxed manner.
Cognitive therapy
Networking
The above frequency distribution table explains the stress management techniques
75.9% of executives listen to music, the most common strategy, to overcome stress.
That is why now-a-days one can hear soft music in almost every organization so that the
executives enjoy their work and feel energetic.
49.2% of executives relax during the day to overcome stress. The best strategy
to reduce stress is to relax. Just 10-15 minutes of relaxation will make the executives to
feel better the rest of the day.
Yes % No % Total %
1 I try to laugh a lot during the day 274 53.7 236 46.3 510 100
2 I go for a walk 231 45.3 277 54.3 510 100
3 I take anti anxiety drugs 310 60.8 197 38.6 510 100
4 I keep a time planner 392 76.9 118 23.1 510 100
5 I try to prioritize my work 443 86.9 67 13.1 510 100
This table explains the practices such as laughing, walking, taking anti depression
drugs, prioritize work, time planner to overcome stress.
Laugh more or crack jokes in order to reduce stress. 53.7% of executives try to
laugh a lot to reduce stress. Laughter is a good de-stressor. A sense of humor allows an
individual to perceive and appreciate the imbalances of life and provides moments of
delight. It is a great stress buster.
45.3% of executives take a walk when they feel anxious about something.
60.8% of executives are taking anti depression drugs for stress reduction.
76.9% of executives follow time discipline. They create time for other things in
life. Effective time management ensures commitment to the schedule planner, to maintain
boundary between home and office and sticking to schedule.
86.9% of executives try to prioritize work. Multi tasking is the buzz word these
days. An individual requires special skills to perform multi task simultaneously. One
way to minimize stress while multi-tasking is to plan, prioritize and perform. Planning
involves preparing a list of activities that need to be performed.
Yes % No % Total %
1 I take planned breaks from work 441 85.5 69 13.5 510 100
2 I delegate responsibility 443 84.9 77 15.1 510 100
3 I spend some time with my pet 402 78.8 108 21.2 510 100
4 I eat a balanced diet 374 73.3 136 26.7 510 100
5 I try to sleep 7-8 hours a day at 403 79.0 107 21 510 100
least 3-4 days a week
6 I have the habit of writing stress 420 82.4 90 17.6 510 100
diary
7 I listen to views of others and 434 85.1 76 149 510 100
provide effective feedback
This table indicates the practices such as planned breaks from work, delegation,
spend time with pet, balanced diet, sound sleep, writing stress diary listening to views of
others to reduce stress.
79% of executives try to sleep 7-8 hours at least 3-4 days a week. A stressed
person may feel sleepy throughout the day and awake during nights. On an average
everyone needs at least 7-8 hours of sleep per day. After a good nights’ sleep, a person
feels fresh.
82.4% of executives have the habit of writing stress dairy as a stress reduction
technique.
Organizational coping strategies are more of proactive nature, that is, they attempt
at removing existing or potential stressors and prevent the onset of stress of individual job
holders. There are many organizational stressors. Therefore, the organizational coping
strategies revolve round these factors which produce or help producing stresses.
Following are organizational coping techniques and efforts.
People experience stress when they are not clear about what they are expected to
do in the organization. This may happen because either there is ambiguity in the role or
there is role conflict. Role analysis technique helps both managers and executives to
analyse what the job entails and what the expectations are. Breaking down the job to its
various components clarifies the role of the job incumbent for the entire system. This
helps to eliminate imposing unrealistic expectations on the individual. Role ambiguity,
role conflict, and role overload can be minimized, consequently leading to reduced stress.
Career planning and counseling helps the executives to obtain professional advice
regarding career paths that would help them to achieve personal goals. A variety of
career counseling programmes can be adopted: (i) devices designed to aid the individuals
in self-assessment and increased self-understanding; (ii) devices designed to
communicate opportunities available to individuals; (iii) career counseling through
interview by managers, counseling professionals and personnel and educational
specialists; (iv) workshops and educational activities designed to assist the individuals in
goal setting and establishing action plan for change; (v) educational and experimental
programmes to prepare individuals with skills and knowledge for new activities and new
careers; (vi) programmes for enhancing the individuals opportunities to make job and
career changes. Various career planning and counseling programmes for individuals go a
long way in providing them satisfaction and reducing the stress.
Stress control workshops
Yes % No % Total %
1 Facilities like rest room, etc 399 78.2 111 21.8 510 100
2 Regular breaks at short intervals 389 76.3 121 23.7 510 100
3 Cafeteria facility 401 78.6 109 21.4 510 100
4 Regular health checkup 443 86.9 67 13.1 510 100
5 Transport facilities 446 87.5 64 12.5 510 100
Yes % No % Total %
1 Off-site picnics / family trips 446 87.5 64 12.5 510 100
2 Recreational facilities 483 94.7 27 5.3 510 100
3 Programmes on balances dieting 438 85.9 72 14.1 510 100
yoga, mediations etc.
4 Programmes on time management 307 60.2 203 39.8 510 100
techniques
5 Personality and career 269 52.7 241 47.3 510 100
development programmes
This table explains the various mechanisms adopted to manage stress. 87.5% of
executives would like to go off-site picnics / family trips. 94.7% of executives make
arrangements of some recreational activities, trips and tours, a source of enjoyment that
shall reduce the level of stress among the executives.
Yes % No % Total %
1 Executives assistance programme 234 45.9 276 54.1 510 100
(EAP)
2 Counseling 338 66.3 172 33.7 510 100
3 Incentives 345 67.6 165 32.4 510 100
4 Job rotation 303 59.4 207 40.6 510 100
From Table 6.6 it is observed the various coping up mechanism for stress. 45.9%
of executives shown their interest on Executives Assistance Programme. EAP is a
specifically designed programme to solve the personal problems of executives. These
problems may be due to job stress. Another type like legal, marital financial or health
related problems ultimately affect employee performance. To help executives deal with
these personal problems more and more organizations are implementing executives
assistance programme. 66.3% of executives are interested in counseling, so the
organization can hold counseling programmes regarding health problem family problem
and job problem. Counseling helps the executives to obtain professional advice
regarding career path that would help them to achieve personal goals.
59.4% of executives have agreed for job rotation which helps in reducing stress.
Job rotation, an approach to management development where an individual is moved
through schedule of assignment designed to give him / her best exposure to the entire
operation.
-----
CORRELATION
Table 6.7
PR ER
MP Pearson Correlation .167(**) .031
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .487
N 510 510
EP Pearson Correlation .251(**) .025
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .573
N 510 510
OD Pearson Correlation .182(**) .085
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .054
N 510 510
PA Pearson Correlation .099(*) .030
Sig. (2-tailed) .025 .504
N 510 510
ED Pearson Correlation .253(**) .041
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .353
N 510 510
RL Pearson Correlation .061 .229(**)
Sig. (2-tailed) .169 .000
N 510 510
GS Pearson Correlation .050 .159(**)
Sig. (2-tailed) .263 .000
N 510 510
CD Pearson Correlation .091(*) .123(**)
Sig. (2-tailed) .041 .006
N 510 510
TR Pearson Correlation .046 .064
Sig. (2-tailed) .301 .147
N 510 510
IR Pearson Correlation .190(**) .136(**)
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .002
N 510 510
From Table 6.7 it is found that management potential causes stress among the
executives in multinational companies and creates more physical responses that can be
identified among the employee (r =0.167). This shows that management potential causes
stress which has come out in the form of physiological changes that affects the
fundamental commitment of executives.
Physical response and the emotional response are united. It can be seen that
employee potential creates stress and its respective outcome, in the form of physiological
change among the executives (r = 0.251). Stress due to employee potential affects the
executives physiological factors.
It is inferred from the above table that the organizational development causes
stress among the executives in multinational companies and creates more physical
response, that can be seen among the executives (r=0.182). This shows that
organizational development causes stress which has resulted in the form of physiological
changes that affects involvement of executives.
Again it is noted from the table that the performance appraisal methods adopted by
the company, creates stress among the executives which results in physiological changes
among the executives (r=0.99). Stress caused due to performance appraisal affects the
performance of executives.
Further, it is observed from the table that the need for executive development
produces stress among the executives which in turn affects the physiological impact of
the executives (r=0.253). Stress released out of executive development interrupts the
commitment of executives. It is understood from the table that an analysis of the
executives roles in the organization causes stress and creates more emotional response
that can be identified among the executives (r=0.229). This reveals that the executives
role causes stress which has come out in the form of emotional changes that affects
commitment of executives.
The variable goal setting produces stress among the executives which can be
identified through the emotional response of stress (r=0.159). This shows that the goal
setting creates stress which is reflected through the emotional response that affects the
performance of executives. That the career development produce stress among the
executives of multinational companies and creates more physical and emotional response
of stress among the executives Physical response (r=0.091) and Emotional response
(r=0.123). This indicates that the career development cause stress and its respective
outcome, in the form of physiological and psychological (emotional) change which
affect, the fundamental commitment of executives.
It is inferred from the above table that the interpersonal relationship cause stress
among the executives of multinational companies and creates physical response and
emotional response of stress that can be identified among the executives Physical
Response=(r=0.190) Emotional Response=(r=0.136). This shows that the interpersonal
relationship causes stress which has come out in the form of physiological changes and
emotional changes that effect the commitment of the executives.
OE
PR Pearson Correlation -.121(**)
Sig. (2-tailed) .006
N 510
ER Pearson Correlation -.422(**)
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 510
The sequential relationship between physical response to stress and emotional
response to stress are also identified through the Karl Pearson co-efficient of correlation.
It is found that both physical response and emotional response are negatively correlated
to the organizational effectiveness (r= -0.121) and (r = - 0.422). This shows
that the causes of stress in the form of physical and emotional responses create more
negative response towards organizational effectiveness. It is found that stress among the
executives’ leads to poor organizational effectiveness and productivity. This empirical
relationship leads to diagrammatic model of cause and effect of stress impact among the
executives of multinational companies. An empirical model on causes and effect stress
impact among the executive of multinational companies. The present study meticulously
deals with perception of executives of multinational companies.
The present research work segmented the causes of stress, outcome of stress, stress
management techniques of coping strategies to create influence over organizational
effectiveness. It is ascertained in the gaps in the literature that Management potential,
Employee Potential, organizational development, Vigerous training, Goal setting,
Interpersonal relationship cause stress among the executives of multinational in Chennai
city. The sequential analysis clearly unraveled the physical and emotional outputs of
stress among the executives. These outcomes may or may not present among the
executives and create pessimistic impact on the executives if their physical or emotional
outcomes are negative. The literature also identified that the stress management among
multinational companies and advanced coping mechanism among the executives
curtailed the transformation of stress causes into physical and emotional responses.
If the optimistic stress management techniques and coping mechanism are found
among the executives then organizational effectiveness is conducive and productive
among the executives. This sequential phenomenon empirically tested parametrically
using Karl Pearson’s co-efficient of correlation and analysis of variance. In this model
the organizational effectiveness is considered as ultimate dependent variable that
measures causes and impact of stress. Their relationships between organizational
effectiveness and management potential, employee potential, emotional response are
presented in the model below. Besides these effects, the influence of gender, marital
status, number of family members, also influence the cause of stress and organizational
effectiveness.
Conclusion:
The purpose of this chapter was to examine in what ways and to what degree, if any,
executives of MNCs perceive stress and what, if any, coping mechanisms were they
engaged in. This chapter focused on qualities of coping mechanisms and their
effectiveness. Underscored throughout the study is the need for effective stress
management skills, professional development geared towards developing a stress model,
and creating a positive school culture. Moreover, the researcher sought to identify any
significant differences between the frequency of stressors by gender and coping
mechanisms utilized by female and male executives.
The findings raise concern that many of the executives are entering the field without the
proper preparation for understanding the implications of stress. Effective stress
management programs should be in place to assist executive leaders as they begin to
create and sustain learning communities. There is need for improvement in supporting
executives with occupational stressors.
49.2% of executives relax during the day to eliminate stress. Just 10-15 minutes of
relaxation will make the executives feel better, the rest of the day.
45.3% of executives take a walk when they are anxious about something.
60.8% of executives are taking anti depression drug for stress reduction.
86.9% of executives try to prioritize work. One way to minimize stress while
multi-tasking is to plan, prioritize and perform.
86.5% of executives take planned breaks from work to overcome stress. Executives
spare time for leisure purpose with which they can overcome their stress problem.
73.3% of executives eat a balanced diet. Just as a balanced diet is necessary for the
physical well being of an individual, mental / emotional balance of life is necessary
for the psychological well being of executives.
79% of executives try to sleep 7-8 hours at least 3-4 days a week. After a goodnight
sleep, a person feels fresh.
82.4% of executives have the habit of writing stress diary as stress reduction
technique.
85.1% of executives listen to views of others to provide effective and timely
feedback.
78.6% of executives prefer cafeteria facility to relax, where executives feel free to
talk openly about their problems and can avoid stress.
67.6% of executives have agreed in getting incentive, appreciation and rewards for
achievement which will reduce stress.
59.4% of executives agree for job rotation, which helps in reducing stress.
Karl Pearson Co-efficient of Correlation reveals that the management potential causes
stress among the executives in multinational companies and creates more physiological
changes that affect the fundamental commitment of executives. Executive potential and
organizational development cause stress and creates more physical response that affects
the involvement of executives. The need for executive development produces stress
which in turn affects the physiological impact of the executives that interrupts the
commitment of executives.
The executive role and goal setting in the organization create more emotional response of
stress. The career development produces more physical and emotional response of stress
among the executives which in turn affects the commitment of workers.
The interpersonal relationship causes stress which has come out in the form of
physiological and emotional changes that affects the commitment of the executives. It is
found that both physical and emotional responses are negatively correlated to the
organizational effectiveness which in turn leads to poor organizational effectiveness and
productivity.