Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
07-1S-2013
SEE ATTACHED
SCHEDULE"A"
WARNING
To the Respondent: If you do not respond to this appeal as provided for in the Aiberta
Rules of Court, the appeal will be decided in your absence and without your input.
Q9;QB:51 a.m. P7-1g-2018 [ 3 | 78tM25P307 j
07/16/2018 08:35 i7804250307 ALBERTA JUSTICE PAGE 03/07
Date served:
h) Whether or not the justice erred in failing to consider evidence in the form of a
number of affidavits adduced by the Crown pertaining to the change to the Mark-up
in 2016 and to the grant program, pertaining to the purpose and character of the
grant program;
i) Whether or not, if the Grant program were to violate s. 121, the justice erred by
proceeding to declare that both the Grant program and the 2016 Mark-up were
contrarytos. 121;
j) Whether or not, on the facts and the general law. the justice erred in applying the
principles of restitution to conclude that these applicants were entitled to monies;
k) Whether or not, in these circumstances, if a remedy were to be required, the
justice should have only applied a public law remedy;
i) Whether or not, if the Markup is contrary to s. 121, the Crown has defences to
any argument that it should owe monies to these parties;
m) Whether or not the justice erred in concluding that "the whole of the Mark-up" is
contrary to s. 121, notwithstanding that "the whole of the Mark-up, consisting of
Individual mark-ups on a range of products, was not challenged in the pleadings that
were filed and that this issue was not argued before the justice and further, whether
she erred In any event as a rhatter of law, in holding that the actions of the Crown
result in "the whole of the Mark-up " being contrary to s. 121. This issue also
includes the question of whether the justice could have granted standing to the
09:05:51 a.m.07-10-2018 | 5| 7804250307 |
07/15/2018 08:35 7804250307 ALBERTA JUSTICE PAGE 05/07
applicants to challenge "the whole of the markup" and whether she erred with
respect to the process she followed in this regard.
With respect to the action involving a challenge to the 2015 Mark-up, the same or
similar issues arise, except issues pertaining to the grant program, which are not
relevant for this particular action.
8. Does this appeal involve the custody, access, parenting or support of a child?
(Rule 14.14(2)(b))
No.
12.Are there any restricted access orders or statutory provisions that affect the
privacy of this file?(Rules 6.29, 14.12(2)(e),14.83)
No.
14.Attachments
SCHEDULE "A''
instructions
L PLEASE JTLE CIVIL NOTICE OF APPEAL IN COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF
ALBERTA.
2. PLEASE FILE CIVIL NOTICE OF APPEAL IN COURT OF APPEAL OF ALBERTA.
3. ONCE FILED WITH BOTH COURTS,PLEASE RETURN,VIA FAX,ASAP,THE
STAMPED FILED COVER PAGE OF THE CIVIL NOTICE OF APPEAL.
THANK YOU! ANY PROBLEMS OR QUESTIONS,CALL JACKY AT 780-422-5137
Signature
Document Title
Has been filed by the Clerks' Office, but Has not been filed by the Clerks' Other Instructions:
we suggest you amend your document Office for the following reasons:
for the following reasons: